Forestar Group Competitors

Innovative Industrial Properties (NYSE:IIPR) and Forestar Group (NYSE:FOR) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Innovative Industrial Properties and Forestar Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Innovative Industrial Properties presently has a consensus target price of $192.4286, suggesting a potential upside of 4.05%. Forestar Group has a consensus target price of $24.00, suggesting a potential downside of 6.98%. Given Innovative Industrial Properties' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Innovative Industrial Properties is more favorable than Forestar Group.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Innovative Industrial Properties and Forestar Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Forestar Group has higher revenue and earnings than Innovative Industrial Properties. Forestar Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Innovative Industrial Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

74.9% of Innovative Industrial Properties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.7% of Forestar Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Innovative Industrial Properties shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Forestar Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Innovative Industrial Properties has a beta of 1.52, meaning that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Forestar Group has a beta of 2.15, meaning that its stock price is 115% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Innovative Industrial Properties and Forestar Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Innovative Industrial Properties beats Forestar Group on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Terreno Realty (NYSE:TRNO) and Forestar Group (NYSE:FOR) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Terreno Realty and Forestar Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

99.9% of Terreno Realty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.7% of Forestar Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Terreno Realty shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Forestar Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Terreno Realty and Forestar Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Forestar Group has higher revenue and earnings than Terreno Realty. Forestar Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Terreno Realty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Terreno Realty and Forestar Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

Terreno Realty presently has a consensus target price of $66.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 7.43%. Forestar Group has a consensus target price of $24.00, suggesting a potential downside of 6.98%. Given Terreno Realty's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Terreno Realty is more favorable than Forestar Group.

Volatility & Risk

Terreno Realty has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its share price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Forestar Group has a beta of 2.15, meaning that its share price is 115% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Terreno Realty beats Forestar Group on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Forestar Group (NYSE:FOR) and Hudson Pacific Properties (NYSE:HPP) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Forestar Group and Hudson Pacific Properties, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Forestar Group presently has a consensus target price of $24.00, suggesting a potential downside of 6.98%. Hudson Pacific Properties has a consensus target price of $27.4375, suggesting a potential downside of 1.23%. Given Hudson Pacific Properties' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hudson Pacific Properties is more favorable than Forestar Group.

Profitability

This table compares Forestar Group and Hudson Pacific Properties' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

30.7% of Forestar Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.1% of Hudson Pacific Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Forestar Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Hudson Pacific Properties shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Forestar Group has a beta of 2.15, meaning that its stock price is 115% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hudson Pacific Properties has a beta of 1, meaning that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Forestar Group and Hudson Pacific Properties' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Forestar Group has higher revenue and earnings than Hudson Pacific Properties. Hudson Pacific Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Forestar Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Forestar Group beats Hudson Pacific Properties on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Forestar Group (NYSE:FOR) and Colliers International Group (NASDAQ:CIGI) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Forestar Group and Colliers International Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Forestar Group presently has a consensus target price of $24.00, suggesting a potential downside of 6.98%. Colliers International Group has a consensus target price of $104.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 0.63%. Given Colliers International Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Colliers International Group is more favorable than Forestar Group.

Profitability

This table compares Forestar Group and Colliers International Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

30.7% of Forestar Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.8% of Colliers International Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Forestar Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.3% of Colliers International Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Forestar Group has a beta of 2.15, meaning that its stock price is 115% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Colliers International Group has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Forestar Group and Colliers International Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Colliers International Group has higher revenue and earnings than Forestar Group. Forestar Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Colliers International Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Colliers International Group beats Forestar Group on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Forestar Group (NYSE:FOR) and Cushman & Wakefield (NYSE:CWK) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Forestar Group and Cushman & Wakefield, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Forestar Group presently has a consensus target price of $24.00, suggesting a potential downside of 6.98%. Cushman & Wakefield has a consensus target price of $16.4583, suggesting a potential downside of 4.20%. Given Cushman & Wakefield's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cushman & Wakefield is more favorable than Forestar Group.

Profitability

This table compares Forestar Group and Cushman & Wakefield's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

30.7% of Forestar Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.2% of Cushman & Wakefield shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Forestar Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Cushman & Wakefield shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Forestar Group has a beta of 2.15, meaning that its stock price is 115% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cushman & Wakefield has a beta of 1.52, meaning that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Forestar Group and Cushman & Wakefield's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Forestar Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cushman & Wakefield.

Summary

Forestar Group beats Cushman & Wakefield on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Forestar Group (NYSE:FOR) and Kennedy-Wilson (NYSE:KW) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Forestar Group and Kennedy-Wilson's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Kennedy-Wilson has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Forestar Group. Kennedy-Wilson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Forestar Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

30.7% of Forestar Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.1% of Kennedy-Wilson shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Forestar Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.7% of Kennedy-Wilson shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Forestar Group and Kennedy-Wilson, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Forestar Group currently has a consensus target price of $24.00, suggesting a potential downside of 6.98%. Kennedy-Wilson has a consensus target price of $21.50, suggesting a potential upside of 5.24%. Given Kennedy-Wilson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kennedy-Wilson is more favorable than Forestar Group.

Profitability

This table compares Forestar Group and Kennedy-Wilson's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Forestar Group has a beta of 2.15, meaning that its stock price is 115% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kennedy-Wilson has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Kennedy-Wilson beats Forestar Group on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.