NYSE:FOR

Forestar Group Competitors

$25.80
+0.51 (+2.02 %)
(As of 04/16/2021 04:00 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$25.56
Now: $25.80
$26.55
50-Day Range
$21.25
MA: $23.29
$25.29
52-Week Range
$10.77
Now: $25.80
$25.37
Volume151,090 shs
Average Volume113,045 shs
Market Capitalization$1.24 billion
P/E Ratio20.48
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.15

Competitors

Forestar Group (NYSE:FOR) Vs. IIPR, TRNO, HPP, CIGI, CWK, and KW

Should you be buying FOR stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "real estate" are considered alternatives and competitors to Forestar Group, including Innovative Industrial Properties (IIPR), Terreno Realty (TRNO), Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP), Colliers International Group (CIGI), Cushman & Wakefield (CWK), and Kennedy-Wilson (KW).

Innovative Industrial Properties (NYSE:IIPR) and Forestar Group (NYSE:FOR) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Innovative Industrial Properties and Forestar Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Innovative Industrial Properties02502.71
Forestar Group01502.83

Innovative Industrial Properties presently has a consensus target price of $192.4286, suggesting a potential upside of 4.05%. Forestar Group has a consensus target price of $24.00, suggesting a potential downside of 6.98%. Given Innovative Industrial Properties' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Innovative Industrial Properties is more favorable than Forestar Group.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Innovative Industrial Properties and Forestar Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Innovative Industrial Properties$44.67 million99.06$23.48 million$3.2756.56
Forestar Group$931.80 million1.33$60.80 million$1.2121.32

Forestar Group has higher revenue and earnings than Innovative Industrial Properties. Forestar Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Innovative Industrial Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

74.9% of Innovative Industrial Properties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.7% of Forestar Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Innovative Industrial Properties shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Forestar Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Innovative Industrial Properties has a beta of 1.52, meaning that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Forestar Group has a beta of 2.15, meaning that its stock price is 115% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Innovative Industrial Properties and Forestar Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Innovative Industrial Properties55.71%6.05%4.82%
Forestar Group6.53%6.92%3.56%

Summary

Innovative Industrial Properties beats Forestar Group on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Terreno Realty (NYSE:TRNO) and Forestar Group (NYSE:FOR) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Terreno Realty and Forestar Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Terreno Realty44.26%5.20%3.83%
Forestar Group6.53%6.92%3.56%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

99.9% of Terreno Realty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.7% of Forestar Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Terreno Realty shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Forestar Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Terreno Realty and Forestar Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Terreno Realty$171.02 million24.80$55.52 million$1.3844.63
Forestar Group$931.80 million1.33$60.80 million$1.2121.32

Forestar Group has higher revenue and earnings than Terreno Realty. Forestar Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Terreno Realty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Terreno Realty and Forestar Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Terreno Realty01602.86
Forestar Group01502.83

Terreno Realty presently has a consensus target price of $66.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 7.43%. Forestar Group has a consensus target price of $24.00, suggesting a potential downside of 6.98%. Given Terreno Realty's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Terreno Realty is more favorable than Forestar Group.

Volatility & Risk

Terreno Realty has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its share price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Forestar Group has a beta of 2.15, meaning that its share price is 115% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Terreno Realty beats Forestar Group on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Forestar Group (NYSE:FOR) and Hudson Pacific Properties (NYSE:HPP) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Forestar Group and Hudson Pacific Properties, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Forestar Group01502.83
Hudson Pacific Properties14302.25

Forestar Group presently has a consensus target price of $24.00, suggesting a potential downside of 6.98%. Hudson Pacific Properties has a consensus target price of $27.4375, suggesting a potential downside of 1.23%. Given Hudson Pacific Properties' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hudson Pacific Properties is more favorable than Forestar Group.

Profitability

This table compares Forestar Group and Hudson Pacific Properties' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Forestar Group6.53%6.92%3.56%
Hudson Pacific Properties2.76%0.61%0.29%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

30.7% of Forestar Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.1% of Hudson Pacific Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Forestar Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Hudson Pacific Properties shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Forestar Group has a beta of 2.15, meaning that its stock price is 115% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hudson Pacific Properties has a beta of 1, meaning that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Forestar Group and Hudson Pacific Properties' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Forestar Group$931.80 million1.33$60.80 million$1.2121.32
Hudson Pacific Properties$818.18 million5.12$44.49 million$2.0313.68

Forestar Group has higher revenue and earnings than Hudson Pacific Properties. Hudson Pacific Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Forestar Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Forestar Group beats Hudson Pacific Properties on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Forestar Group (NYSE:FOR) and Colliers International Group (NASDAQ:CIGI) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Forestar Group and Colliers International Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Forestar Group01502.83
Colliers International Group01602.86

Forestar Group presently has a consensus target price of $24.00, suggesting a potential downside of 6.98%. Colliers International Group has a consensus target price of $104.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 0.63%. Given Colliers International Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Colliers International Group is more favorable than Forestar Group.

Profitability

This table compares Forestar Group and Colliers International Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Forestar Group6.53%6.92%3.56%
Colliers International Group2.27%12.41%2.16%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

30.7% of Forestar Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.8% of Colliers International Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Forestar Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.3% of Colliers International Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Forestar Group has a beta of 2.15, meaning that its stock price is 115% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Colliers International Group has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Forestar Group and Colliers International Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Forestar Group$931.80 million1.33$60.80 million$1.2121.32
Colliers International Group$3.05 billion1.35$102.90 million$2.5740.98

Colliers International Group has higher revenue and earnings than Forestar Group. Forestar Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Colliers International Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Colliers International Group beats Forestar Group on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Forestar Group (NYSE:FOR) and Cushman & Wakefield (NYSE:CWK) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Forestar Group and Cushman & Wakefield, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Forestar Group01502.83
Cushman & Wakefield02502.71

Forestar Group presently has a consensus target price of $24.00, suggesting a potential downside of 6.98%. Cushman & Wakefield has a consensus target price of $16.4583, suggesting a potential downside of 4.20%. Given Cushman & Wakefield's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cushman & Wakefield is more favorable than Forestar Group.

Profitability

This table compares Forestar Group and Cushman & Wakefield's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Forestar Group6.53%6.92%3.56%
Cushman & Wakefield-2.32%-17.04%-2.72%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

30.7% of Forestar Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.2% of Cushman & Wakefield shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Forestar Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Cushman & Wakefield shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Forestar Group has a beta of 2.15, meaning that its stock price is 115% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cushman & Wakefield has a beta of 1.52, meaning that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Forestar Group and Cushman & Wakefield's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Forestar Group$931.80 million1.33$60.80 million$1.2121.32
Cushman & Wakefield$8.75 billion0.44$200,000.00N/AN/A

Forestar Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cushman & Wakefield.

Summary

Forestar Group beats Cushman & Wakefield on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Forestar Group (NYSE:FOR) and Kennedy-Wilson (NYSE:KW) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Forestar Group and Kennedy-Wilson's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Forestar Group$931.80 million1.33$60.80 million$1.2121.32
Kennedy-Wilson$569.70 million5.06$226.70 million$3.126.55

Kennedy-Wilson has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Forestar Group. Kennedy-Wilson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Forestar Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

30.7% of Forestar Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.1% of Kennedy-Wilson shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Forestar Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.7% of Kennedy-Wilson shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Forestar Group and Kennedy-Wilson, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Forestar Group01502.83
Kennedy-Wilson00203.00

Forestar Group currently has a consensus target price of $24.00, suggesting a potential downside of 6.98%. Kennedy-Wilson has a consensus target price of $21.50, suggesting a potential upside of 5.24%. Given Kennedy-Wilson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kennedy-Wilson is more favorable than Forestar Group.

Profitability

This table compares Forestar Group and Kennedy-Wilson's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Forestar Group6.53%6.92%3.56%
Kennedy-Wilson19.52%22.05%4.10%

Risk and Volatility

Forestar Group has a beta of 2.15, meaning that its stock price is 115% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kennedy-Wilson has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Kennedy-Wilson beats Forestar Group on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Forestar Group Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Innovative Industrial Properties logo
IIPR
Innovative Industrial Properties
1.8$184.94+0.8%$4.42 billion$44.67 million59.85Analyst Revision
Terreno Realty logo
TRNO
Terreno Realty
1.9$61.59+0.9%$4.24 billion$171.02 million51.76Analyst Upgrade
Hudson Pacific Properties logo
HPP
Hudson Pacific Properties
1.7$27.78+0.4%$4.19 billion$818.18 million198.43Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Colliers International Group logo
CIGI
Colliers International Group
2.1$105.33+2.1%$4.11 billion$3.05 billion67.09Analyst Downgrade
Cushman & Wakefield logo
CWK
Cushman & Wakefield
1.2$17.18+1.0%$3.83 billion$8.75 billion-19.75Unusual Options Activity
Kennedy-Wilson logo
KW
Kennedy-Wilson
2.3$20.43+1.5%$2.88 billion$569.70 million35.84Insider Selling
News Coverage
Gap Down
Urban Edge Properties logo
UE
Urban Edge Properties
1.6$17.88+1.2%$2.09 billion$387.65 million27.51News Coverage
Office Properties Income Trust logo
OPI
Office Properties Income Trust
2.0$28.51+0.3%$1.38 billion$678.40 million18.63Dividend Announcement
Analyst Report
News Coverage
Getty Realty logo
GTY
Getty Realty
1.7$30.57+0.2%$1.34 billion$140.65 million26.35News Coverage
Five Point logo
FPH
Five Point
1.1$7.38+1.9%$1.09 billion$184.38 million105.44
Armada Hoffler Properties logo
AHH
Armada Hoffler Properties
1.6$13.56+0.5%$1.09 billion$257.20 million30.13Analyst Upgrade
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Ellington Financial logo
EFC
Ellington Financial
1.6$17.63+0.6%$771.88 million$159.90 million-21.24Analyst Report
News Coverage
Seritage Growth Properties logo
SRG
Seritage Growth Properties
0.9$18.07+0.3%$702.98 million$168.63 million-6.82
RFL
Rafael
0.0$39.43+0.3%$657.38 million$4.91 million-60.66News Coverage
FRP logo
FRPH
FRP
0.6$51.02+0.0%$478.98 million$23.76 million36.18News Coverage
NTP
Nam Tai Property
0.6$12.15+1.9%$469.38 million$2.96 million-34.71Unusual Options Activity
Gap Up
Tejon Ranch logo
TRC
Tejon Ranch
1.3$15.77+0.7%$415.33 million$49.52 million45.06
Retail Value logo
RVI
Retail Value
2.0$18.64+2.0%$392.99 million$239.10 million-2.96Analyst Report
News Coverage
Gap Down
Bluegreen Vacations logo
BVH
Bluegreen Vacations
0.8$19.36+0.5%$374.00 million$946.87 million-4.25
DUO
Fangdd Network Group
1.1$5.12+1.6%$373.40 million$511.05 million-1.53Increase in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
INDUS Realty Trust logo
INDT
INDUS Realty Trust
1.5$60.97+0.4%$345.27 million$44.04 million-73.46Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Griffin Industrial Realty logo
GRIF
Griffin Industrial Realty
0.6$60.97+0.4%$344.91 million$44.04 million-73.46
Griffin Industrial Realty logo
GRIF
Griffin Industrial Realty
1.0$60.97+0.4%$344.91 million$44.04 million-73.46
Cresud Sociedad Anónima Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria logo
CRESY
Cresud Sociedad Anónima Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria
0.7$5.69+0.2%$292.98 million$2.07 billion-1.72News Coverage
Leju logo
LEJU
Leju
0.7$2.09+5.3%$284.92 million$692.60 million26.13Gap Down
MLP
Maui Land & Pineapple
0.7$11.57+0.1%$224.34 million$10.05 million-20.30
MMA Capital logo
MMAC
MMA Capital
0.6$17.38+2.0%$99.80 million$58.17 million0.00
OBAS
Optibase
0.9$10.85+1.5%$56.59 million$16.14 million9.43Gap Up
HGSH
China HGS Real Estate
1.0$2.07+2.9%$46.63 million$12.98 million51.75
Comstock Holding Companies logo
CHCI
Comstock Holding Companies
0.8$4.57+1.1%$37.91 million$25.32 million0.00Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
This page was last updated on 4/18/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.