Do analysts recommend LXFR or EPAC?

Enerpac Tool Group has a consensus target price of $50.00, indicating a potential upside of 42.30%. Given Enerpac Tool Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Enerpac Tool Group is more favorable than Luxfer. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Luxfer 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67 Enerpac Tool Group 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25

Which has better earnings and valuation, LXFR or EPAC?

Enerpac Tool Group has higher revenue and earnings than Luxfer. Enerpac Tool Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Luxfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Luxfer $384.60M 1.21 $7.70M $0.30 57.52 Enerpac Tool Group $616.90M 2.91 $92.75M $1.77 19.85

Does the media favor LXFR or EPAC?

In the previous week, Enerpac Tool Group had 2 more articles in the media than Luxfer. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Enerpac Tool Group and 1 mentions for Luxfer. Enerpac Tool Group's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Luxfer's score of -0.45 indicating that Enerpac Tool Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Luxfer 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Enerpac Tool Group 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate ATS or LXFR?

ATS currently has a consensus price target of $42.50, suggesting a potential upside of 141.48%. Given ATS's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe ATS is more favorable than Luxfer. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score ATS 2 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.14 Luxfer 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, ATS or LXFR?

ATS has higher revenue and earnings than Luxfer. ATS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Luxfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio ATS $2.15B 0.79 $51.85M $0.34 51.76 Luxfer $384.60M 1.21 $7.70M $0.30 57.52

Is ATS or LXFR more profitable?

Luxfer has a net margin of 2.20% compared to ATS's net margin of 1.60%. Luxfer's return on equity of 12.22% beat ATS's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets ATS 1.60% 8.96% 3.63% Luxfer 2.20% 12.22% 7.23%

Does the media prefer ATS or LXFR?

In the previous week, ATS had 2 more articles in the media than Luxfer. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for ATS and 1 mentions for Luxfer. ATS's average media sentiment score of 0.04 beat Luxfer's score of -0.45 indicating that ATS is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment ATS 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Luxfer 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate LXFR or AIN?

Albany International has a consensus price target of $67.67, suggesting a potential upside of 11.53%. Given Albany International's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Albany International is more favorable than Luxfer. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Luxfer 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67 Albany International 1 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.80

Does the media favor LXFR or AIN?

In the previous week, Albany International had 5 more articles in the media than Luxfer. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Albany International and 1 mentions for Luxfer. Albany International's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Luxfer's score of -0.45 indicating that Albany International is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Luxfer 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Albany International 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate CMPO or LXFR?

CompoSecure presently has a consensus target price of $26.00, indicating a potential upside of 106.35%. Given CompoSecure's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe CompoSecure is more favorable than Luxfer. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score CompoSecure 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Luxfer 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67

Which has higher earnings & valuation, CMPO or LXFR?

Luxfer has higher revenue and earnings than CompoSecure. CompoSecure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Luxfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio CompoSecure $160.68M 9.91 -$53.72M -$2.16 N/A Luxfer $384.60M 1.21 $7.70M $0.30 57.52

Is CMPO or LXFR more profitable?

Luxfer has a net margin of 2.20% compared to CompoSecure's net margin of -24.53%. Luxfer's return on equity of 12.22% beat CompoSecure's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets CompoSecure -24.53% -65.50% 26.83% Luxfer 2.20% 12.22% 7.23%

Does the media refer more to CMPO or LXFR?

In the previous week, CompoSecure and CompoSecure both had 1 articles in the media. CompoSecure's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Luxfer's score of -0.45 indicating that CompoSecure is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment CompoSecure 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Luxfer 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend LXFR or HLMN?

Hillman Solutions has a consensus target price of $12.67, suggesting a potential upside of 78.15%. Given Hillman Solutions' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hillman Solutions is more favorable than Luxfer. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Luxfer 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67 Hillman Solutions 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Which has better earnings and valuation, LXFR or HLMN?

Hillman Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than Luxfer. Hillman Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Luxfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Luxfer $384.60M 1.21 $7.70M $0.30 57.52 Hillman Solutions $1.55B 0.89 $40.31M $0.22 32.32

Does the media prefer LXFR or HLMN?

In the previous week, Hillman Solutions had 5 more articles in the media than Luxfer. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Hillman Solutions and 1 mentions for Luxfer. Hillman Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Luxfer's score of -0.45 indicating that Hillman Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Luxfer 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Hillman Solutions 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Luxfer (LXFR) Competitors

$17.26 +0.02 (+0.09%)

Closing price 10/12/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$17.25 -0.01 (-0.05%)

As of 08:04 AM Eastern

Compare

LXFR vs. EPAC, ATS, AIN, CMPO, and HLMN

Should you buy Luxfer stock or one of its competitors? Luxfer's main competitors and comparable companies include Enerpac Tool Group (EPAC), ATS (ATS), Albany International (AIN), CompoSecure (CMPO), and Hillman Solutions (HLMN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery & supplies & components" industry.

How does Luxfer compare to Enerpac Tool Group?

Luxfer (NYSE:LXFR) and Enerpac Tool Group (NYSE:EPAC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Enerpac Tool Group has a net margin of 14.72% compared to Luxfer's net margin of 2.20%. Enerpac Tool Group's return on equity of 23.21% beat Luxfer's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Luxfer	2.20%	12.22%	7.23%
Enerpac Tool Group	14.72%	23.21%	12.10%

Enerpac Tool Group has a consensus target price of $50.00, indicating a potential upside of 42.30%. Given Enerpac Tool Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Enerpac Tool Group is more favorable than Luxfer.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Luxfer	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Enerpac Tool Group	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Luxfer pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Enerpac Tool Group pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Luxfer pays out 173.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enerpac Tool Group pays out 2.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Enerpac Tool Group has higher revenue and earnings than Luxfer. Enerpac Tool Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Luxfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Luxfer	$384.60M	1.21	$7.70M	$0.30	57.52
Enerpac Tool Group	$616.90M	2.91	$92.75M	$1.77	19.85

In the previous week, Enerpac Tool Group had 2 more articles in the media than Luxfer. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Enerpac Tool Group and 1 mentions for Luxfer. Enerpac Tool Group's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Luxfer's score of -0.45 indicating that Enerpac Tool Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Luxfer	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Enerpac Tool Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Luxfer has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enerpac Tool Group has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its share price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

90.8% of Luxfer shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.7% of Enerpac Tool Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Luxfer shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Enerpac Tool Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Enerpac Tool Group beats Luxfer on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Luxfer compare to ATS?

ATS (NYSE:ATS) and Luxfer (NYSE:LXFR) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

ATS has higher revenue and earnings than Luxfer. ATS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Luxfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ATS	$2.15B	0.79	$51.85M	$0.34	51.76
Luxfer	$384.60M	1.21	$7.70M	$0.30	57.52

Luxfer has a net margin of 2.20% compared to ATS's net margin of 1.60%. Luxfer's return on equity of 12.22% beat ATS's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ATS	1.60%	8.96%	3.63%
Luxfer	2.20%	12.22%	7.23%

75.8% of ATS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.8% of Luxfer shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Luxfer shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, ATS had 2 more articles in the media than Luxfer. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for ATS and 1 mentions for Luxfer. ATS's average media sentiment score of 0.04 beat Luxfer's score of -0.45 indicating that ATS is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
ATS	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Luxfer	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

ATS has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Luxfer has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

ATS currently has a consensus price target of $42.50, suggesting a potential upside of 141.48%. Given ATS's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe ATS is more favorable than Luxfer.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ATS	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.14
Luxfer	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Summary

Luxfer beats ATS on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Luxfer compare to Albany International?

Luxfer (NYSE:LXFR) and Albany International (NYSE:AIN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Albany International had 5 more articles in the media than Luxfer. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Albany International and 1 mentions for Luxfer. Albany International's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Luxfer's score of -0.45 indicating that Albany International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Luxfer	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Albany International	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Luxfer pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Albany International pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Luxfer pays out 173.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Albany International pays out -64.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Albany International has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years.

Luxfer has a net margin of 2.20% compared to Albany International's net margin of -4.18%. Luxfer's return on equity of 12.22% beat Albany International's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Luxfer	2.20%	12.22%	7.23%
Albany International	-4.18%	10.76%	4.64%

Albany International has a consensus price target of $67.67, suggesting a potential upside of 11.53%. Given Albany International's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Albany International is more favorable than Luxfer.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Luxfer	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Albany International	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.80

90.8% of Luxfer shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.4% of Albany International shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Luxfer shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Albany International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Luxfer has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Albany International. Albany International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Luxfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Luxfer	$384.60M	1.21	$7.70M	$0.30	57.52
Albany International	$1.22B	1.41	-$57.34M	-$1.74	N/A

Luxfer has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Albany International has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Luxfer beats Albany International on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Luxfer compare to CompoSecure?

CompoSecure (NASDAQ:CMPO) and Luxfer (NYSE:LXFR) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends and institutional ownership.

CompoSecure has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Luxfer has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

CompoSecure presently has a consensus target price of $26.00, indicating a potential upside of 106.35%. Given CompoSecure's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe CompoSecure is more favorable than Luxfer.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CompoSecure	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Luxfer	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Luxfer has a net margin of 2.20% compared to CompoSecure's net margin of -24.53%. Luxfer's return on equity of 12.22% beat CompoSecure's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CompoSecure	-24.53%	-65.50%	26.83%
Luxfer	2.20%	12.22%	7.23%

Luxfer has higher revenue and earnings than CompoSecure. CompoSecure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Luxfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CompoSecure	$160.68M	9.91	-$53.72M	-$2.16	N/A
Luxfer	$384.60M	1.21	$7.70M	$0.30	57.52

37.6% of CompoSecure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.8% of Luxfer shares are owned by institutional investors. 52.1% of CompoSecure shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Luxfer shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, CompoSecure and CompoSecure both had 1 articles in the media. CompoSecure's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Luxfer's score of -0.45 indicating that CompoSecure is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
CompoSecure	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Luxfer	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Luxfer beats CompoSecure on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Luxfer compare to Hillman Solutions?

Luxfer (NYSE:LXFR) and Hillman Solutions (NASDAQ:HLMN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and risk.

90.8% of Luxfer shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.1% of Hillman Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Luxfer shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of Hillman Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Hillman Solutions had 5 more articles in the media than Luxfer. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Hillman Solutions and 1 mentions for Luxfer. Hillman Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Luxfer's score of -0.45 indicating that Hillman Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Luxfer	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Hillman Solutions	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Hillman Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than Luxfer. Hillman Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Luxfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Luxfer	$384.60M	1.21	$7.70M	$0.30	57.52
Hillman Solutions	$1.55B	0.89	$40.31M	$0.22	32.32

Hillman Solutions has a consensus target price of $12.67, suggesting a potential upside of 78.15%. Given Hillman Solutions' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hillman Solutions is more favorable than Luxfer.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Luxfer	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Hillman Solutions	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Hillman Solutions has a net margin of 2.57% compared to Luxfer's net margin of 2.20%. Luxfer's return on equity of 12.22% beat Hillman Solutions' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Luxfer	2.20%	12.22%	7.23%
Hillman Solutions	2.57%	9.11%	4.70%

Luxfer has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hillman Solutions has a beta of 1.42, meaning that its share price is 42% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Hillman Solutions beats Luxfer on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Luxfer News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LXFR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

LXFR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Luxfer	Machinery Industry	Industrials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$465.36M	$10.95B	$10.21B	$23.07B
Dividend Yield	3.02%	2.32%	96.64%	3.72%
P/E Ratio	57.52	20.75	26.64	28.54
Price / Sales	1.29	56.37	274.47	14.52
Price / Cash	11.34	23.07	23.92	19.30
Price / Book	2.03	4.27	4.74	4.71
Net Income	$7.70M	$375.76M	$614.62M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	0.06%	-0.32%	-1.40%	-0.56%
1 Month Performance	-0.29%	-1.80%	-2.90%	-3.59%
1 Year Performance	30.62%	4.99%	2.09%	7.41%

Luxfer Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
LXFR Luxfer	2.2687 of 5 stars	$17.26 +0.1%	N/A	+37.4%	$465.36M	$360.90M	57.52	1,350
EPAC Enerpac Tool Group	4.3555 of 5 stars	$35.67 -1.0%	$50.00 +40.2%	-9.0%	$1.82B	$634.08M	20.15	2,100	Positive News
ATS ATS	2.3899 of 5 stars	$18.27 -1.4%	$42.50 +132.6%	-30.7%	$1.77B	$2.93B	53.73	7,000
AIN Albany International	2.3083 of 5 stars	$59.16 -0.5%	$61.00 +3.1%	+13.0%	$1.68B	$1.18B	N/A	5,700	Analyst Upgrade
CMPO CompoSecure	1.7286 of 5 stars	$12.98 +0.6%	$26.00 +100.3%	-35.6%	$1.64B	$160.68M	N/A	720

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:LXFR) was last updated on 10/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Luxfer (LXFR) Competitors

LXFR vs. EPAC, ATS, AIN, CMPO, and HLMN

How does Luxfer compare to Enerpac Tool Group?

Summary

How does Luxfer compare to ATS?

Summary

How does Luxfer compare to Albany International?

Summary

How does Luxfer compare to CompoSecure?

Summary

How does Luxfer compare to Hillman Solutions?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LXFR vs. The Competition

Luxfer Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Luxfer (LXFR) Competitors

LXFR vs. EPAC, ATS, AIN, CMPO, and HLMN

How does Luxfer compare to Enerpac Tool Group?

Is LXFR or EPAC more profitable?

Do analysts recommend LXFR or EPAC?

Is LXFR or EPAC a better dividend stock?

Which has better earnings and valuation, LXFR or EPAC?

Does the media favor LXFR or EPAC?

Which has more volatility & risk, LXFR or EPAC?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of LXFR or EPAC?

Summary

How does Luxfer compare to ATS?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, ATS or LXFR?

Is ATS or LXFR more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of ATS or LXFR?

Does the media prefer ATS or LXFR?

Which has more volatility and risk, ATS or LXFR?

Do analysts rate ATS or LXFR?

Summary

How does Luxfer compare to Albany International?

Does the media favor LXFR or AIN?

Is LXFR or AIN a better dividend stock?

Is LXFR or AIN more profitable?

Do analysts rate LXFR or AIN?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in LXFR or AIN?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, LXFR or AIN?

Which has more volatility and risk, LXFR or AIN?

Summary

How does Luxfer compare to CompoSecure?

Which has more risk and volatility, CMPO or LXFR?

Do analysts rate CMPO or LXFR?

Is CMPO or LXFR more profitable?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, CMPO or LXFR?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in CMPO or LXFR?

Does the media refer more to CMPO or LXFR?

Summary

How does Luxfer compare to Hillman Solutions?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of LXFR or HLMN?

Does the media prefer LXFR or HLMN?

Which has better earnings and valuation, LXFR or HLMN?

Do analysts recommend LXFR or HLMN?

Is LXFR or HLMN more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, LXFR or HLMN?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LXFR vs. The Competition

Luxfer Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools