Go Pro

Luxfer (LXFR) Competitors

Luxfer logo
$17.08 +0.01 (+0.03%)
As of 01:25 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

LXFR vs. CMPO, AIN, HLMN, GHM, and TNC

Should you buy Luxfer stock or one of its competitors? Luxfer's main competitors and comparable companies include CompoSecure (CMPO), Albany International (AIN), Hillman Solutions (HLMN), Graham (GHM), and Tennant (TNC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery & supplies & components" industry.

How does Luxfer compare to CompoSecure?

Luxfer (NYSE:LXFR) and CompoSecure (NASDAQ:CMPO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and risk.

CompoSecure has a consensus target price of $25.50, suggesting a potential upside of 79.96%. Given CompoSecure's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CompoSecure is more favorable than Luxfer.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Luxfer
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
CompoSecure
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Luxfer has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CompoSecure has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CompoSecure had 1 more articles in the media than Luxfer. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for CompoSecure and 1 mentions for Luxfer. Luxfer's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat CompoSecure's score of 0.08 indicating that Luxfer is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Luxfer
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
CompoSecure
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Luxfer has a net margin of 2.20% compared to CompoSecure's net margin of -24.53%. Luxfer's return on equity of 12.22% beat CompoSecure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Luxfer2.20% 12.22% 7.23%
CompoSecure -24.53%-65.50%26.83%

90.8% of Luxfer shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.6% of CompoSecure shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Luxfer shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 52.1% of CompoSecure shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Luxfer has higher revenue and earnings than CompoSecure. CompoSecure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Luxfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Luxfer$360.90M1.27$7.70M$0.3056.95
CompoSecure$160.68M11.15-$53.72M-$2.16N/A

Summary

Luxfer beats CompoSecure on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Luxfer compare to Albany International?

Luxfer (NYSE:LXFR) and Albany International (NYSE:AIN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Albany International had 3 more articles in the media than Luxfer. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Albany International and 1 mentions for Luxfer. Albany International's average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Luxfer's score of 0.61 indicating that Albany International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Luxfer
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Albany International
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Luxfer has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Albany International has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Luxfer has a net margin of 2.20% compared to Albany International's net margin of -4.18%. Luxfer's return on equity of 12.22% beat Albany International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Luxfer2.20% 12.22% 7.23%
Albany International -4.18%10.76%4.64%

Luxfer pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Albany International pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Luxfer pays out 173.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Albany International pays out -64.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Albany International has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years.

Albany International has a consensus price target of $54.00, indicating a potential downside of 15.33%. Given Albany International's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Albany International is more favorable than Luxfer.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Luxfer
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Albany International
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

90.8% of Luxfer shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.4% of Albany International shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Luxfer shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Albany International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Luxfer has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Albany International. Albany International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Luxfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Luxfer$360.90M1.27$7.70M$0.3056.95
Albany International$1.22B1.48-$57.34M-$1.74N/A

Summary

Luxfer beats Albany International on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Luxfer compare to Hillman Solutions?

Luxfer (NYSE:LXFR) and Hillman Solutions (NASDAQ:HLMN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Hillman Solutions has a net margin of 2.57% compared to Luxfer's net margin of 2.20%. Luxfer's return on equity of 12.22% beat Hillman Solutions' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Luxfer2.20% 12.22% 7.23%
Hillman Solutions 2.57%9.11%4.70%

Hillman Solutions has a consensus target price of $12.50, indicating a potential upside of 41.16%. Given Hillman Solutions' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hillman Solutions is more favorable than Luxfer.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Luxfer
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Hillman Solutions
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

90.8% of Luxfer shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.1% of Hillman Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Luxfer shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of Hillman Solutions shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Luxfer has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hillman Solutions has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

Hillman Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than Luxfer. Hillman Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Luxfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Luxfer$360.90M1.27$7.70M$0.3056.95
Hillman Solutions$1.55B1.12$40.31M$0.2240.25

In the previous week, Hillman Solutions had 8 more articles in the media than Luxfer. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Hillman Solutions and 1 mentions for Luxfer. Hillman Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Luxfer's score of 0.61 indicating that Hillman Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Luxfer
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Hillman Solutions
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Hillman Solutions beats Luxfer on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Luxfer compare to Graham?

Luxfer (NYSE:LXFR) and Graham (NYSE:GHM) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends and media sentiment.

Graham has a consensus price target of $132.50, suggesting a potential upside of 18.19%. Given Graham's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Graham is more favorable than Luxfer.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Luxfer
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Graham
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Graham has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Luxfer. Luxfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Graham, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Luxfer$360.90M1.27$7.70M$0.3056.95
Graham$261.15M5.04$12.50M$1.04107.79

Luxfer has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Graham has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Graham had 27 more articles in the media than Luxfer. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Graham and 1 mentions for Luxfer. Graham's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Luxfer's score of 0.61 indicating that Graham is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Luxfer
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Graham
9 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Luxfer pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Graham pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Luxfer pays out 173.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Graham pays out 42.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

90.8% of Luxfer shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.5% of Graham shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Luxfer shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Graham shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Graham has a net margin of 4.53% compared to Luxfer's net margin of 2.20%. Luxfer's return on equity of 12.22% beat Graham's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Luxfer2.20% 12.22% 7.23%
Graham 4.53%11.09%5.17%

Summary

Graham beats Luxfer on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Luxfer compare to Tennant?

Tennant (NYSE:TNC) and Luxfer (NYSE:LXFR) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Tennant pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Luxfer pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Tennant pays out 121.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Luxfer pays out 173.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Tennant has increased its dividend for 53 consecutive years.

93.3% of Tennant shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.8% of Luxfer shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.5% of Tennant shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Luxfer shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Luxfer has a net margin of 2.20% compared to Tennant's net margin of 1.50%. Tennant's return on equity of 13.32% beat Luxfer's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tennant1.50% 13.32% 6.07%
Luxfer 2.20%12.22%7.23%

Tennant currently has a consensus price target of $91.00, suggesting a potential upside of 33.97%. Given Tennant's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Tennant is more favorable than Luxfer.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tennant
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Luxfer
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Tennant has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Luxfer has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

Tennant has higher revenue and earnings than Luxfer. Luxfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tennant, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tennant$1.20B0.96$43.80M$1.0266.59
Luxfer$360.90M1.27$7.70M$0.3056.95

In the previous week, Tennant had 21 more articles in the media than Luxfer. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Tennant and 1 mentions for Luxfer. Luxfer's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Tennant's score of -0.31 indicating that Luxfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Tennant
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Luxfer
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Tennant beats Luxfer on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Luxfer News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LXFR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LXFR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LXFR vs. The Competition

MetricLuxferMachinery IndustryIndustrials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$457.18M$11.79B$10.90B$24.24B
Dividend Yield3.04%2.17%97.00%3.70%
P/E Ratio56.9521.5628.2830.30
Price / Sales1.2765.43348.3217.80
Price / Cash11.2323.6524.8333.27
Price / Book2.054.244.566.57
Net Income$7.70M$357.00M$607.65M$1.06B
7 Day Performance-0.08%0.56%1.52%1.05%
1 Month Performance0.35%2.35%3.14%2.93%
1 Year Performance32.13%12.22%13.31%17.25%

Luxfer Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LXFR
Luxfer
2.9999 of 5 stars
$17.09
+0.0%
N/A+38.5%$457.18M$360.90M56.951,350
CMPO
CompoSecure
2.111 of 5 stars
$14.35
-4.3%
$25.50
+77.7%
-24.7%$1.81B$160.68MN/A1,007
AIN
Albany International
2.0145 of 5 stars
$62.97
+3.2%
$54.00
-14.2%
+1.7%$1.79B$1.18BN/A5,700
HLMN
Hillman Solutions
4.4047 of 5 stars
$9.01
-0.8%
$12.50
+38.7%
-9.6%$1.77B$1.55B40.963,986
GHM
Graham
3.4923 of 5 stars
$108.95
+0.2%
$132.50
+21.6%
+125.1%$1.28B$245.29M104.76490

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:LXFR) was last updated on 8/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners