Do analysts recommend EPAC or LXFR?

Enerpac Tool Group currently has a consensus price target of $50.00, suggesting a potential upside of 39.53%. Given Enerpac Tool Group's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Enerpac Tool Group is more favorable than Luxfer. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Enerpac Tool Group 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25 Luxfer 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67

Do analysts recommend AIN or LXFR?

Albany International currently has a consensus price target of $61.00, indicating a potential upside of 1.38%. Given Albany International's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Albany International is more favorable than Luxfer. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Albany International 1 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.80 Luxfer 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67

Do analysts rate LXFR or CMPO?

CompoSecure has a consensus price target of $26.00, indicating a potential upside of 109.85%. Given CompoSecure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe CompoSecure is more favorable than Luxfer. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Luxfer 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67 CompoSecure 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Is LXFR or CMPO more profitable?

Luxfer has a net margin of 2.20% compared to CompoSecure's net margin of -24.53%. Luxfer's return on equity of 12.22% beat CompoSecure's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Luxfer 2.20% 12.22% 7.23% CompoSecure -24.53% -65.50% 26.83%

Do analysts rate HLMN or LXFR?

Hillman Solutions presently has a consensus target price of $12.67, suggesting a potential upside of 74.71%. Given Hillman Solutions' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Hillman Solutions is more favorable than Luxfer. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Hillman Solutions 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.60 Luxfer 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67

Do analysts recommend LXFR or TNC?

Tennant has a consensus price target of $91.00, indicating a potential upside of 35.82%. Given Tennant's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Tennant is more favorable than Luxfer. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Luxfer 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67 Tennant 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has higher earnings and valuation, LXFR or TNC?

Tennant has higher revenue and earnings than Luxfer. Luxfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tennant, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Luxfer $384.60M 1.21 $7.70M $0.30 57.58 Tennant $1.20B 0.95 $43.80M $1.02 65.69

Is LXFR or TNC more profitable?

Luxfer has a net margin of 2.20% compared to Tennant's net margin of 1.50%. Tennant's return on equity of 13.32% beat Luxfer's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Luxfer 2.20% 12.22% 7.23% Tennant 1.50% 13.32% 6.07%

Does the media refer more to LXFR or TNC?

In the previous week, Tennant had 1 more articles in the media than Luxfer. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Tennant and 1 mentions for Luxfer. Luxfer's average media sentiment score of 1.94 beat Tennant's score of 0.42 indicating that Luxfer is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Luxfer 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Tennant 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Luxfer (LXFR) Competitors

$17.27 +0.04 (+0.20%)

Closing price 09/22/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$17.38 +0.10 (+0.58%)

As of 09/22/2026 07:30 PM Eastern

Compare

LXFR vs. EPAC, AIN, CMPO, HLMN, and TNC

Should you buy Luxfer stock or one of its competitors? Luxfer's main competitors and comparable companies include Enerpac Tool Group (EPAC), Albany International (AIN), CompoSecure (CMPO), Hillman Solutions (HLMN), and Tennant (TNC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery & supplies & components" industry.

How does Luxfer compare to Enerpac Tool Group?

Enerpac Tool Group (NYSE:EPAC) and Luxfer (NYSE:LXFR) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and profitability.

Enerpac Tool Group currently has a consensus price target of $50.00, suggesting a potential upside of 39.53%. Given Enerpac Tool Group's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Enerpac Tool Group is more favorable than Luxfer.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Enerpac Tool Group	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Luxfer	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Enerpac Tool Group has a net margin of 14.72% compared to Luxfer's net margin of 2.20%. Enerpac Tool Group's return on equity of 23.21% beat Luxfer's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Enerpac Tool Group	14.72%	23.21%	12.10%
Luxfer	2.20%	12.22%	7.23%

97.7% of Enerpac Tool Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.8% of Luxfer shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Enerpac Tool Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Luxfer shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Enerpac Tool Group pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Luxfer pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Enerpac Tool Group pays out 2.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Luxfer pays out 173.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Enerpac Tool Group has higher revenue and earnings than Luxfer. Enerpac Tool Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Luxfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Enerpac Tool Group	$616.90M	2.97	$92.75M	$1.77	20.25
Luxfer	$384.60M	1.21	$7.70M	$0.30	57.58

Enerpac Tool Group has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Luxfer has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Luxfer had 1 more articles in the media than Enerpac Tool Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Luxfer and 0 mentions for Enerpac Tool Group. Luxfer's average media sentiment score of 1.94 beat Enerpac Tool Group's score of 1.11 indicating that Luxfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Enerpac Tool Group	Positive
Luxfer	Very Positive

Summary

Enerpac Tool Group beats Luxfer on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Luxfer compare to Albany International?

Albany International (NYSE:AIN) and Luxfer (NYSE:LXFR) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Albany International currently has a consensus price target of $61.00, indicating a potential upside of 1.38%. Given Albany International's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Albany International is more favorable than Luxfer.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Albany International	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.80
Luxfer	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Luxfer has a net margin of 2.20% compared to Albany International's net margin of -4.18%. Luxfer's return on equity of 12.22% beat Albany International's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Albany International	-4.18%	10.76%	4.64%
Luxfer	2.20%	12.22%	7.23%

97.4% of Albany International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.8% of Luxfer shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Albany International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Luxfer shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Albany International pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Luxfer pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Albany International pays out -64.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Luxfer pays out 173.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Albany International has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years.

Luxfer has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Albany International. Albany International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Luxfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Albany International	$1.18B	1.44	-$57.34M	-$1.74	N/A
Luxfer	$384.60M	1.21	$7.70M	$0.30	57.58

In the previous week, Luxfer had 1 more articles in the media than Albany International. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Luxfer and 0 mentions for Albany International. Luxfer's average media sentiment score of 1.94 beat Albany International's score of 0.00 indicating that Luxfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Albany International	Neutral
Luxfer	Very Positive

Albany International has a beta of 1.16, meaning that its share price is 16% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Luxfer has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Luxfer beats Albany International on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Luxfer compare to CompoSecure?

Luxfer (NYSE:LXFR) and CompoSecure (NASDAQ:CMPO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Luxfer had 1 more articles in the media than CompoSecure. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Luxfer and 0 mentions for CompoSecure. Luxfer's average media sentiment score of 1.94 beat CompoSecure's score of 0.00 indicating that Luxfer is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Luxfer	Very Positive
CompoSecure	Neutral

90.8% of Luxfer shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.6% of CompoSecure shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Luxfer shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 52.1% of CompoSecure shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Luxfer has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CompoSecure has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

Luxfer has a net margin of 2.20% compared to CompoSecure's net margin of -24.53%. Luxfer's return on equity of 12.22% beat CompoSecure's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Luxfer	2.20%	12.22%	7.23%
CompoSecure	-24.53%	-65.50%	26.83%

Luxfer has higher revenue and earnings than CompoSecure. CompoSecure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Luxfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Luxfer	$384.60M	1.21	$7.70M	$0.30	57.58
CompoSecure	$160.68M	9.75	-$53.72M	-$2.16	N/A

CompoSecure has a consensus price target of $26.00, indicating a potential upside of 109.85%. Given CompoSecure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe CompoSecure is more favorable than Luxfer.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Luxfer	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
CompoSecure	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Luxfer beats CompoSecure on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Luxfer compare to Hillman Solutions?

Hillman Solutions (NASDAQ:HLMN) and Luxfer (NYSE:LXFR) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Hillman Solutions has a net margin of 2.57% compared to Luxfer's net margin of 2.20%. Luxfer's return on equity of 12.22% beat Hillman Solutions' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hillman Solutions	2.57%	9.11%	4.70%
Luxfer	2.20%	12.22%	7.23%

Hillman Solutions presently has a consensus target price of $12.67, suggesting a potential upside of 74.71%. Given Hillman Solutions' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Hillman Solutions is more favorable than Luxfer.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hillman Solutions	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60
Luxfer	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

98.1% of Hillman Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.8% of Luxfer shares are held by institutional investors. 5.3% of Hillman Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Luxfer shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Hillman Solutions has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Luxfer has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Luxfer had 1 more articles in the media than Hillman Solutions. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Luxfer and 0 mentions for Hillman Solutions. Luxfer's average media sentiment score of 1.94 beat Hillman Solutions' score of 0.44 indicating that Luxfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Hillman Solutions	Neutral
Luxfer	Very Positive

Hillman Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than Luxfer. Hillman Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Luxfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hillman Solutions	$1.55B	0.91	$40.31M	$0.22	32.95
Luxfer	$384.60M	1.21	$7.70M	$0.30	57.58

Summary

Hillman Solutions and Luxfer tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Luxfer compare to Tennant?

Luxfer (NYSE:LXFR) and Tennant (NYSE:TNC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Tennant has higher revenue and earnings than Luxfer. Luxfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tennant, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Luxfer	$384.60M	1.21	$7.70M	$0.30	57.58
Tennant	$1.20B	0.95	$43.80M	$1.02	65.69

In the previous week, Tennant had 1 more articles in the media than Luxfer. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Tennant and 1 mentions for Luxfer. Luxfer's average media sentiment score of 1.94 beat Tennant's score of 0.42 indicating that Luxfer is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Luxfer	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Tennant	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Luxfer pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Tennant pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Luxfer pays out 173.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Tennant pays out 121.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Tennant has raised its dividend for 53 consecutive years.

Tennant has a consensus price target of $91.00, indicating a potential upside of 35.82%. Given Tennant's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Tennant is more favorable than Luxfer.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Luxfer	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Tennant	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

90.8% of Luxfer shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.3% of Tennant shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Luxfer shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.5% of Tennant shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Luxfer has a net margin of 2.20% compared to Tennant's net margin of 1.50%. Tennant's return on equity of 13.32% beat Luxfer's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Luxfer	2.20%	12.22%	7.23%
Tennant	1.50%	13.32%	6.07%

Luxfer has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tennant has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Tennant beats Luxfer on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Luxfer News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LXFR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

LXFR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Luxfer	Machinery Industry	Industrials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$465.36M	$11.29B	$10.34B	$23.14B
Dividend Yield	3.02%	2.28%	96.94%	3.62%
P/E Ratio	57.58	21.63	25.74	28.40
Price / Sales	1.21	64.33	285.67	21.42
Price / Cash	11.34	23.08	23.97	39.12
Price / Book	2.03	4.31	4.94	4.71
Net Income	$7.70M	$370.56M	$615.14M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	0.35%	1.13%	1.99%	0.58%
1 Month Performance	0.44%	-2.19%	-2.39%	-3.43%
1 Year Performance	22.43%	7.18%	4.47%	8.48%

Luxfer Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
LXFR Luxfer	2.4672 of 5 stars	$17.28 +0.2%	N/A	+20.8%	$465.36M	$384.60M	57.58	1,350	Positive News
EPAC Enerpac Tool Group	4.1853 of 5 stars	$34.60 +0.3%	$50.00 +44.5%	-12.4%	$1.77B	$634.08M	19.55	2,100	Positive News
AIN Albany International	1.1579 of 5 stars	$59.47 -1.2%	$61.00 +2.6%	+7.3%	$1.69B	$1.22B	N/A	5,700
CMPO CompoSecure	1.9682 of 5 stars	$12.98 -2.4%	$26.00 +100.3%	-38.8%	$1.64B	$160.68M	N/A	720	Gap Up
HLMN Hillman Solutions	4.4231 of 5 stars	$7.25 +0.6%	$12.67 +74.7%	-22.7%	$1.41B	$1.60B	32.96	3,986	Gap Up High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:LXFR) was last updated on 9/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Luxfer (LXFR) Competitors

LXFR vs. EPAC, AIN, CMPO, HLMN, and TNC

How does Luxfer compare to Enerpac Tool Group?

Summary

How does Luxfer compare to Albany International?

Summary

How does Luxfer compare to CompoSecure?

Summary

How does Luxfer compare to Hillman Solutions?

Summary

How does Luxfer compare to Tennant?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LXFR vs. The Competition

Luxfer Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Luxfer (LXFR) Competitors

LXFR vs. EPAC, AIN, CMPO, HLMN, and TNC

How does Luxfer compare to Enerpac Tool Group?

Do analysts recommend EPAC or LXFR?

Is EPAC or LXFR more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in EPAC or LXFR?

Is EPAC or LXFR a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, EPAC or LXFR?

Which has more volatility & risk, EPAC or LXFR?

Does the media favor EPAC or LXFR?

Summary

How does Luxfer compare to Albany International?

Do analysts recommend AIN or LXFR?

Is AIN or LXFR more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of AIN or LXFR?

Is AIN or LXFR a better dividend stock?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, AIN or LXFR?

Does the media prefer AIN or LXFR?

Which has more risk & volatility, AIN or LXFR?

Summary

How does Luxfer compare to CompoSecure?

Does the media prefer LXFR or CMPO?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in LXFR or CMPO?

Which has more volatility and risk, LXFR or CMPO?

Is LXFR or CMPO more profitable?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, LXFR or CMPO?

Do analysts rate LXFR or CMPO?

Summary

How does Luxfer compare to Hillman Solutions?

Is HLMN or LXFR more profitable?

Do analysts rate HLMN or LXFR?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of HLMN or LXFR?

Which has more risk and volatility, HLMN or LXFR?

Does the media favor HLMN or LXFR?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, HLMN or LXFR?

Summary

How does Luxfer compare to Tennant?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, LXFR or TNC?

Does the media refer more to LXFR or TNC?

Is LXFR or TNC a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend LXFR or TNC?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of LXFR or TNC?

Is LXFR or TNC more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, LXFR or TNC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LXFR vs. The Competition

Luxfer Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools