S&P 500   3,971.27
DOW   32,394.25
QQQ   307.12
Walgreens Boots Alliance: Blue Chip, High-Yield Turnaround Story
Banking Nightmare (Ad)
3 Small Financial Software Makers Showing Strong Chart Action
Here’s Why Viking Therapeutics Rose Over 50% on Obesity Drug Data
Banking Nightmare (Ad)
Roku And The 20% Rally That’s About To Start 
Don't Be Fooled by These 3 Value Traps
Banking Nightmare (Ad)
The Bottom Is In For McCormick & Company
Interactive Brokers: A Better Bet Than Schwab Post-SVB?
S&P 500   3,971.27
DOW   32,394.25
QQQ   307.12
Walgreens Boots Alliance: Blue Chip, High-Yield Turnaround Story
Banking Nightmare (Ad)
3 Small Financial Software Makers Showing Strong Chart Action
Here’s Why Viking Therapeutics Rose Over 50% on Obesity Drug Data
Banking Nightmare (Ad)
Roku And The 20% Rally That’s About To Start 
Don't Be Fooled by These 3 Value Traps
Banking Nightmare (Ad)
The Bottom Is In For McCormick & Company
Interactive Brokers: A Better Bet Than Schwab Post-SVB?
S&P 500   3,971.27
DOW   32,394.25
QQQ   307.12
Walgreens Boots Alliance: Blue Chip, High-Yield Turnaround Story
Banking Nightmare (Ad)
3 Small Financial Software Makers Showing Strong Chart Action
Here’s Why Viking Therapeutics Rose Over 50% on Obesity Drug Data
Banking Nightmare (Ad)
Roku And The 20% Rally That’s About To Start 
Don't Be Fooled by These 3 Value Traps
Banking Nightmare (Ad)
The Bottom Is In For McCormick & Company
Interactive Brokers: A Better Bet Than Schwab Post-SVB?
S&P 500   3,971.27
DOW   32,394.25
QQQ   307.12
Walgreens Boots Alliance: Blue Chip, High-Yield Turnaround Story
Banking Nightmare (Ad)
3 Small Financial Software Makers Showing Strong Chart Action
Here’s Why Viking Therapeutics Rose Over 50% on Obesity Drug Data
Banking Nightmare (Ad)
Roku And The 20% Rally That’s About To Start 
Don't Be Fooled by These 3 Value Traps
Banking Nightmare (Ad)
The Bottom Is In For McCormick & Company
Interactive Brokers: A Better Bet Than Schwab Post-SVB?
NYSE:PG

Procter & Gamble ESG Rating & Sustainability Data

$146.36
+0.41 (+0.28%)
(As of 03/28/2023 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$145.80
$146.82
50-Day Range
$136.57
$146.72
52-Week Range
$122.18
$164.90
Volume
4.21 million shs
Average Volume
7.03 million shs
Market Capitalization
$345.28 billion
P/E Ratio
25.68
Dividend Yield
2.49%
Price Target
$155.27

Key ESG Takeaways for Procter & Gamble

The keytakeaways are AI-generated and highlight the main contributors behind the net impact scores of Procter & Gamble. The insights are based on millions of scientific articles, along with the company-specific product and service portfolio.
  • Procter & Gamble seems to create the most significant positive value in categories , , and . The largest positive contribution comes from its impact, which is mostly driven by its Electric toothbrushes, Dental floss, Toothpaste, and Sanitary pads products.
  • Procter & Gamble uses resources or causes negative impacts mostly in categories , , and . The largest negative impact of Procter & Gamble in category seems to be driven mostly by its Sanitary pads, Nonwoven cleaning wipes, Glass cleaning detergents, Nonwoven wet polyester cosmetic wipes, Pantyliners, and Paper towels products.
  • To improve its net impact, a company can either grow its positive impacts, or reduce its negative impacts. For example, by doubling its Electric toothbrushes business, Procter & Gamble would improve its net impact ratio by 5 percentage points.

PG Impact Ratio

Net impact ratio represents the net impact of a company. It is defined as the (positive impacts - negative impacts) / positive impacts. The maximum value for net impact ratio is 100%, representing a theoretical company with no negative impacts. The minimum value is -∞. Net scores depend on the value sets that determine the importance of different impact categories.
-11.1%
The default value set, where each category is given the same weight.

Value Sets Value sets can be used to assess how different stakeholder values or emphasis on certain values might affect the net impact ratio.

Millennials
Value set of millennials (b. 1980 - 1999), based on Upright's annual Impact at Work survey.
+15.3%
Most Wanted Workforce
Value set of the most wanted workforce, based on Upright's annual Impact at Work survey.
-36.6%
Society First
Value set that emphasizes society impacts over other impacts.
-54.9%
Knowledge First
Value set that emphasizes knowledge impacts over other impacts.
-17.1%
Health First
Value set that emphasizes health impacts over other impacts.
+37.3%

Procter & Gamble ESG Score + Net Impact Profile

ImpactNegativeScorePositive
+0.73
+0.73
+1.05
+1.05
+0.13
+0.13
-0.02
-0.02
+0.00
-0.02
0.00
+0.02
+0.01
+0.01
+0.03
+0.03
-0.00
+0.01
+0.01
-0.81
-0.81
-0.37
+0.74
+1.11
-0.01
0.00
+0.01
+0.02
+0.02
-0.00
+0.00
+0.00
-0.01
+0.24
+0.25
-1.50
-1.38
+0.12
-0.32
-0.28
+0.04
-0.14
-0.13
+0.01
-0.16
-0.16
+0.00
-0.70
-0.58
+0.12

Upright Model Version 0.7.100
ESG Data Last Updated: January 31, 2023

About Upright's Net Impact Model

Upright's Net Impact Data quantifies the holistic value creation and impact of companies. It details both the negative and positive impacts a company has on the environment, health of people, society and knowledge, and forms a net sum of these costs and gains based on the economic costs of each impact category. The data is produced by Upright's Net Impact model, which is a mathematical model of the economy that produces continuously updated estimates of the net impact of companies by means of an information integration algorithm. The data is primarily sourced from the CORE open access database, which contains over 200 million scientific papers. Other sources of data include open databases published by the World Bank, IMF, WHO, OECD, IPCC, CDC and USDA.













Procter & Gamble ESG Rating - Frequently Asked Questions

How is Procter & Gamble doing in terms of sustainability?

According to The Upright Project, which measures holistic value creation and impact of companies, Procter & Gamble has a net impact ratio of -11.1%, indicating an overall negative sustainability impact. Procter & Gamble seems to create the most significant positive value in the categories of Physical diseases, Taxes, and Jobs. Procter & Gamble uses resources or causes negative impacts mostly in the categories of GHG emissions, Scarce human capital, and Waste. Learn more on the sustainability of Procter & Gamble.

This page (NYSE:PG) was last updated on 3/29/2023 by MarketBeat.com Staff