Go Pro
→ 'How Much Can I Actually Spend Each Year With $2.5M Saved?' (From SmartAsset) (Ad)tc pixel Free PG Stock Alerts

Procter & Gamble (PG) Competitors

Procter & Gamble logo
$145.54 -2.78 (-1.87%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$145.63 +0.09 (+0.06%)
As of 07:59 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

PG vs. KMB, PEP, TSLA, WMT, and BRK.B

Should you buy Procter & Gamble stock or one of its competitors? Procter & Gamble's main competitors and comparable companies include Kimberly-Clark (KMB), PepsiCo (PEP), Tesla (TSLA), Walmart (WMT), and Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Procter & Gamble compare to Kimberly-Clark?

Kimberly-Clark (NASDAQ:KMB) and Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, risk, earnings and valuation.

In the previous week, Procter & Gamble had 9 more articles in the media than Kimberly-Clark. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Procter & Gamble and 13 mentions for Kimberly-Clark. Procter & Gamble's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Kimberly-Clark's score of 0.55 indicating that Procter & Gamble is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Kimberly-Clark
5 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Procter & Gamble
12 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

76.3% of Kimberly-Clark shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.8% of Procter & Gamble shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Kimberly-Clark shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Procter & Gamble shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Kimberly-Clark pays an annual dividend of $5.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Procter & Gamble pays an annual dividend of $4.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Kimberly-Clark pays out 87.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Procter & Gamble pays out 65.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kimberly-Clark has increased its dividend for 54 consecutive years and Procter & Gamble has increased its dividend for 70 consecutive years.

Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.25, indicating that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.39, indicating that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 18.44% compared to Kimberly-Clark's net margin of 11.79%. Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 143.92% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kimberly-Clark11.79% 143.92% 14.21%
Procter & Gamble 18.44%31.36%13.09%

Kimberly-Clark presently has a consensus price target of $117.36, indicating a potential upside of 20.45%. Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $161.55, indicating a potential upside of 11.00%. Given Kimberly-Clark's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kimberly-Clark is more favorable than Procter & Gamble.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kimberly-Clark
1 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29
Procter & Gamble
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Procter & Gamble has higher revenue and earnings than Kimberly-Clark. Kimberly-Clark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Procter & Gamble, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kimberly-Clark$16.58B1.95$2.02B$5.8816.57
Procter & Gamble$87.03B3.88$16.05B$6.6221.99

Summary

Procter & Gamble beats Kimberly-Clark on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Procter & Gamble compare to PepsiCo?

PepsiCo (NASDAQ:PEP) and Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and profitability.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.35, meaning that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.39, meaning that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

PepsiCo pays an annual dividend of $5.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Procter & Gamble pays an annual dividend of $4.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. PepsiCo pays out 77.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Procter & Gamble pays out 65.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. PepsiCo has increased its dividend for 54 consecutive years and Procter & Gamble has increased its dividend for 70 consecutive years.

In the previous week, PepsiCo had 49 more articles in the media than Procter & Gamble. MarketBeat recorded 71 mentions for PepsiCo and 22 mentions for Procter & Gamble. Procter & Gamble's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat PepsiCo's score of 0.13 indicating that Procter & Gamble is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PepsiCo
17 Very Positive mention(s)
12 Positive mention(s)
18 Neutral mention(s)
13 Negative mention(s)
6 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Procter & Gamble
12 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

73.1% of PepsiCo shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.8% of Procter & Gamble shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of PepsiCo shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Procter & Gamble shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

PepsiCo currently has a consensus target price of $151.70, indicating a potential upside of 19.71%. Procter & Gamble has a consensus target price of $161.55, indicating a potential upside of 11.00%. Given PepsiCo's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe PepsiCo is more favorable than Procter & Gamble.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PepsiCo
1 Sell rating(s)
14 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20
Procter & Gamble
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Procter & Gamble has lower revenue, but higher earnings than PepsiCo. PepsiCo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Procter & Gamble, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PepsiCo$96.90B1.78$8.24B$7.6316.61
Procter & Gamble$87.03B3.88$16.05B$6.6221.99

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 18.44% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of 10.78%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 54.63% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PepsiCo10.78% 54.63% 10.49%
Procter & Gamble 18.44%31.36%13.09%

Summary

Procter & Gamble beats PepsiCo on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Procter & Gamble compare to Tesla?

Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG) and Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 18.44% compared to Tesla's net margin of 3.67%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 31.36% beat Tesla's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Procter & Gamble18.44% 31.36% 13.09%
Tesla 3.67%3.82%2.27%

65.8% of Procter & Gamble shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.2% of Tesla shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Procter & Gamble shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.9% of Tesla shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Procter & Gamble has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tesla. Procter & Gamble is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tesla, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Procter & Gamble$87.03B3.88$16.05B$6.6221.99
Tesla$103.62B13.52$3.79B$1.08328.53

In the previous week, Tesla had 198 more articles in the media than Procter & Gamble. MarketBeat recorded 220 mentions for Tesla and 22 mentions for Procter & Gamble. Procter & Gamble's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Tesla's score of 0.38 indicating that Procter & Gamble is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Procter & Gamble
12 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Tesla
66 Very Positive mention(s)
50 Positive mention(s)
59 Neutral mention(s)
31 Negative mention(s)
9 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Procter & Gamble currently has a consensus target price of $161.55, suggesting a potential upside of 11.00%. Tesla has a consensus target price of $410.98, suggesting a potential upside of 15.83%. Given Tesla's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Tesla is more favorable than Procter & Gamble.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Procter & Gamble
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Tesla
5 Sell rating(s)
20 Hold rating(s)
21 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.39, meaning that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tesla has a beta of 1.84, meaning that its share price is 84% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Tesla beats Procter & Gamble on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Procter & Gamble compare to Walmart?

Walmart (NASDAQ:WMT) and Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

26.8% of Walmart shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.8% of Procter & Gamble shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Walmart shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Procter & Gamble shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 18.44% compared to Walmart's net margin of 3.00%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 31.36% beat Walmart's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Walmart3.00% 21.83% 7.80%
Procter & Gamble 18.44%31.36%13.09%

Walmart presently has a consensus price target of $131.74, indicating a potential upside of 26.77%. Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $161.55, indicating a potential upside of 11.00%. Given Walmart's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Walmart is more favorable than Procter & Gamble.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Walmart
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
32 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.97
Procter & Gamble
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Walmart has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.39, indicating that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

Walmart pays an annual dividend of $0.99 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Procter & Gamble pays an annual dividend of $4.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Walmart pays out 35.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 65.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Walmart has raised its dividend for 53 consecutive years and Procter & Gamble has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years. Procter & Gamble is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Walmart had 26 more articles in the media than Procter & Gamble. MarketBeat recorded 48 mentions for Walmart and 22 mentions for Procter & Gamble. Procter & Gamble's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Walmart's score of 0.65 indicating that Procter & Gamble is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Walmart
20 Very Positive mention(s)
12 Positive mention(s)
11 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Procter & Gamble
12 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Walmart has higher revenue and earnings than Procter & Gamble. Procter & Gamble is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Walmart, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Walmart$735.84B1.12$21.89B$2.7737.52
Procter & Gamble$87.03B3.88$16.05B$6.6221.99

Summary

Walmart and Procter & Gamble tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Procter & Gamble compare to Berkshire Hathaway?

Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.B) and Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

Berkshire Hathaway has higher revenue and earnings than Procter & Gamble. Berkshire Hathaway is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Procter & Gamble, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Berkshire Hathaway$371.44B2.87$66.97B$39.7712.53
Procter & Gamble$87.03B3.88$16.05B$6.6221.99

Berkshire Hathaway has a net margin of 22.30% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of 18.44%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 31.36% beat Berkshire Hathaway's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Berkshire Hathaway22.30% 6.62% 3.87%
Procter & Gamble 18.44%31.36%13.09%

39.3% of Berkshire Hathaway shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.8% of Procter & Gamble shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.1% of Berkshire Hathaway shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Procter & Gamble shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Berkshire Hathaway has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.39, suggesting that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Berkshire Hathaway had 1 more articles in the media than Procter & Gamble. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Berkshire Hathaway and 22 mentions for Procter & Gamble. Procter & Gamble's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Berkshire Hathaway's score of 0.36 indicating that Procter & Gamble is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Berkshire Hathaway
12 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Procter & Gamble
12 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Berkshire Hathaway presently has a consensus target price of $542.50, indicating a potential upside of 8.84%. Procter & Gamble has a consensus target price of $161.55, indicating a potential upside of 11.00%. Given Procter & Gamble's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Procter & Gamble is more favorable than Berkshire Hathaway.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Berkshire Hathaway
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Procter & Gamble
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Summary

Procter & Gamble beats Berkshire Hathaway on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Procter & Gamble News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricProcter & GamblePersonal Care Products IndustryConsumer Staples SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$338.05B$22.65B$15.37B$22.62B
Dividend Yield2.92%5.58%3.31%3.69%
P/E Ratio21.9920.8413.8627.52
Price / Sales3.8812.62264,297.1084.06
Price / Cash17.4826.5057.1041.75
Price / Book6.332.844.254.60
Net Income$16.05B$1.13B$842.01M$1.08B
7 Day Performance-1.24%-2.13%-1.43%-1.99%
1 Month Performance1.27%-7.71%-5.23%-6.24%
1 Year Performance-5.29%-22.42%8.04%5.07%

Procter & Gamble Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PG
Procter & Gamble
4.6815 of 5 stars		$145.54
-1.9%		$161.55
+11.0%		-3.3%$338.05B$87.03B21.99104,000
KMB
Kimberly-Clark
4.0131 of 5 stars		$99.13
+1.4%		$117.36
+18.4%		-19.3%$32.95B$16.45B16.8536,000
PEP
PepsiCo
4.4576 of 5 stars		$131.05
+1.1%		$157.90
+20.5%		-8.2%$179.18B$93.93B17.21306,000
TSLA
Tesla
4.3212 of 5 stars		$376.62
+0.4%		$412.25
+9.5%		-20.4%$1.49T$94.83B348.86134,785
WMT
Walmart
4.908 of 5 stars		$109.09
+1.5%		$131.88
+20.9%		+3.7%$867.08B$713.16B39.462,100,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:PG) was last updated on 9/30/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
How options let you do more with less capital
Would you rather spend $5,000 buying 100 shares of a $50 stock, or control those same 100 shares for a fractio...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
"How Much Can I Actually Spend Each Year With $2.5M Saved?"
Having $2.5 million saved puts you ahead of most Americans, but how long it lasts depends on the decisions you...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
This AI Stock Reminds One Analyst of Early Nvidia
Jeff Brown picked Nvidia in 2016, before shares surged 37,800 percent. Now he's identified another AI company ...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Major Buy Alert Issued for September 30th
Keith Kaplan has invested $17 million into his own AI research tools, building a platform now used by 180,000 ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why major institutions are piling into this digital asset now
BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Fidelity are reportedly accumulating a scarce blockchain asset - one t...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
Bank of America: 'Digital Dollar Inevitable'
Bank of America just revealed your expiration date. In their Bloomberg interview, they didn't just predict the...
Decentralized Masters | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel