Free Trial
→ The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month (From Investors Alley) (Ad)tc pixel Free PG Stock Alerts

Procter & Gamble (PG) Competitors

Procter & Gamble logo
$151.27 +0.68 (+0.45%)
Closing price 10/9/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$151.19 -0.08 (-0.06%)
As of 10/9/2026 07:59 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

PG vs. KMB, PEP, TSLA, WMT, and BRK.B

Should you buy Procter & Gamble stock or one of its competitors? Procter & Gamble's main competitors and comparable companies include Kimberly-Clark (KMB), PepsiCo (PEP), Tesla (TSLA), Walmart (WMT), and Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Procter & Gamble compare to Kimberly-Clark?

Kimberly-Clark (NASDAQ:KMB) and Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 18.44% compared to Kimberly-Clark's net margin of 11.79%. Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 143.92% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kimberly-Clark11.79% 143.92% 14.21%
Procter & Gamble 18.44%31.36%13.09%

Kimberly-Clark pays an annual dividend of $5.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.2%. Procter & Gamble pays an annual dividend of $4.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Kimberly-Clark pays out 87.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Procter & Gamble pays out 65.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kimberly-Clark has raised its dividend for 54 consecutive years and Procter & Gamble has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years.

76.3% of Kimberly-Clark shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.8% of Procter & Gamble shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Kimberly-Clark shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Procter & Gamble shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.25, meaning that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.39, meaning that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

Procter & Gamble has higher revenue and earnings than Kimberly-Clark. Kimberly-Clark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Procter & Gamble, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kimberly-Clark$16.45B1.97$2.02B$5.8816.60
Procter & Gamble$87.03B4.04$16.05B$6.6222.85

Kimberly-Clark presently has a consensus price target of $117.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.89%. Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $161.70, suggesting a potential upside of 6.89%. Given Kimberly-Clark's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Kimberly-Clark is more favorable than Procter & Gamble.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kimberly-Clark
1 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29
Procter & Gamble
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.58

In the previous week, Procter & Gamble had 25 more articles in the media than Kimberly-Clark. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Procter & Gamble and 10 mentions for Kimberly-Clark. Procter & Gamble's average media sentiment score of 0.27 beat Kimberly-Clark's score of -0.11 indicating that Procter & Gamble is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Kimberly-Clark
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Procter & Gamble
12 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
6 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Procter & Gamble beats Kimberly-Clark on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Procter & Gamble compare to PepsiCo?

PepsiCo (NASDAQ:PEP) and Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability and institutional ownership.

Procter & Gamble has lower revenue, but higher earnings than PepsiCo. PepsiCo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Procter & Gamble, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PepsiCo$93.93B1.83$8.24B$7.6316.51
Procter & Gamble$87.03B4.04$16.05B$6.6222.85

PepsiCo presently has a consensus price target of $145.85, suggesting a potential upside of 15.78%. Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $161.70, suggesting a potential upside of 6.89%. Given PepsiCo's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe PepsiCo is more favorable than Procter & Gamble.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PepsiCo
1 Sell rating(s)
14 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20
Procter & Gamble
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.58

PepsiCo pays an annual dividend of $5.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Procter & Gamble pays an annual dividend of $4.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. PepsiCo pays out 77.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Procter & Gamble pays out 65.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. PepsiCo has raised its dividend for 54 consecutive years and Procter & Gamble has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years.

73.1% of PepsiCo shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.8% of Procter & Gamble shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of PepsiCo shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Procter & Gamble shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, PepsiCo had 102 more articles in the media than Procter & Gamble. MarketBeat recorded 137 mentions for PepsiCo and 35 mentions for Procter & Gamble. Procter & Gamble's average media sentiment score of 0.27 beat PepsiCo's score of 0.13 indicating that Procter & Gamble is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PepsiCo
25 Very Positive mention(s)
33 Positive mention(s)
25 Neutral mention(s)
32 Negative mention(s)
14 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Procter & Gamble
12 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
6 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 18.44% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of 11.09%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 53.72% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PepsiCo11.09% 53.72% 10.47%
Procter & Gamble 18.44%31.36%13.09%

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.35, meaning that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.39, meaning that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Procter & Gamble beats PepsiCo on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Procter & Gamble compare to Tesla?

Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) and Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Tesla presently has a consensus price target of $412.19, indicating a potential upside of 7.71%. Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $161.70, indicating a potential upside of 6.89%. Given Tesla's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Tesla is more favorable than Procter & Gamble.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tesla
5 Sell rating(s)
17 Hold rating(s)
24 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.45
Procter & Gamble
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.58

66.2% of Tesla shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.8% of Procter & Gamble shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.9% of Tesla shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Procter & Gamble shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Procter & Gamble has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tesla. Procter & Gamble is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tesla, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tesla$94.83B15.94$3.79B$1.08354.35
Procter & Gamble$87.03B4.04$16.05B$6.6222.85

Tesla has a beta of 1.92, meaning that its stock price is 92% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.39, meaning that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Tesla had 152 more articles in the media than Procter & Gamble. MarketBeat recorded 187 mentions for Tesla and 35 mentions for Procter & Gamble. Tesla's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Procter & Gamble's score of 0.27 indicating that Tesla is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Tesla
77 Very Positive mention(s)
35 Positive mention(s)
48 Neutral mention(s)
16 Negative mention(s)
10 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Procter & Gamble
12 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
6 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 18.44% compared to Tesla's net margin of 3.67%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 31.36% beat Tesla's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tesla3.67% 3.82% 2.27%
Procter & Gamble 18.44%31.36%13.09%

Summary

Tesla beats Procter & Gamble on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Procter & Gamble compare to Walmart?

Walmart (NASDAQ:WMT) and Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

Walmart currently has a consensus target price of $131.74, suggesting a potential upside of 18.31%. Procter & Gamble has a consensus target price of $161.70, suggesting a potential upside of 6.89%. Given Walmart's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Walmart is more favorable than Procter & Gamble.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Walmart
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
32 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.97
Procter & Gamble
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.58

In the previous week, Walmart had 17 more articles in the media than Procter & Gamble. MarketBeat recorded 52 mentions for Walmart and 35 mentions for Procter & Gamble. Walmart's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Procter & Gamble's score of 0.27 indicating that Walmart is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Walmart
29 Very Positive mention(s)
9 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Procter & Gamble
12 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
6 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Walmart has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.39, meaning that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

26.8% of Walmart shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.8% of Procter & Gamble shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Walmart shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Procter & Gamble shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Walmart pays an annual dividend of $0.99 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Procter & Gamble pays an annual dividend of $4.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Walmart pays out 35.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 65.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Walmart has increased its dividend for 53 consecutive years and Procter & Gamble has increased its dividend for 70 consecutive years. Procter & Gamble is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 18.44% compared to Walmart's net margin of 3.00%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 31.36% beat Walmart's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Walmart3.00% 21.83% 7.80%
Procter & Gamble 18.44%31.36%13.09%

Walmart has higher revenue and earnings than Procter & Gamble. Procter & Gamble is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Walmart, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Walmart$713.16B1.24$21.89B$2.7740.20
Procter & Gamble$87.03B4.04$16.05B$6.6222.85

Summary

Walmart beats Procter & Gamble on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Procter & Gamble compare to Berkshire Hathaway?

Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG) and Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.B) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.39, suggesting that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Berkshire Hathaway has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Procter & Gamble had 23 more articles in the media than Berkshire Hathaway. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Procter & Gamble and 12 mentions for Berkshire Hathaway. Procter & Gamble's average media sentiment score of 0.27 beat Berkshire Hathaway's score of 0.22 indicating that Procter & Gamble is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Procter & Gamble
12 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
6 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Berkshire Hathaway
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Berkshire Hathaway has higher revenue and earnings than Procter & Gamble. Berkshire Hathaway is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Procter & Gamble, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Procter & Gamble$87.03B4.04$16.05B$6.6222.85
Berkshire Hathaway$371.44B2.97$66.97B$39.7712.96

Berkshire Hathaway has a net margin of 22.30% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of 18.44%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 31.36% beat Berkshire Hathaway's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Procter & Gamble18.44% 31.36% 13.09%
Berkshire Hathaway 22.30%6.62%3.87%

Procter & Gamble presently has a consensus target price of $161.70, suggesting a potential upside of 6.89%. Berkshire Hathaway has a consensus target price of $542.50, suggesting a potential upside of 5.25%. Given Procter & Gamble's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Procter & Gamble is more favorable than Berkshire Hathaway.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Procter & Gamble
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.58
Berkshire Hathaway
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

65.8% of Procter & Gamble shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.3% of Berkshire Hathaway shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Procter & Gamble shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of Berkshire Hathaway shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Procter & Gamble beats Berkshire Hathaway on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Procter & Gamble News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricProcter & GamblePersonal Care Products IndustryConsumer Staples SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$351.26B$23.17B$15.89B$23.07B
Dividend Yield2.88%5.53%3.31%3.72%
P/E Ratio22.8521.8513.8528.58
Price / Sales4.0412.87264,297.0120.72
Price / Cash17.7426.7357.2438.93
Price / Book6.582.894.344.72
Net Income$16.05B$1.13B$844.17M$1.07B
7 Day Performance4.38%1.21%0.85%0.35%
1 Month Performance4.24%-4.71%-2.58%-3.40%
1 Year Performance1.06%-19.53%9.74%9.40%

Procter & Gamble Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PG
Procter & Gamble
3.9133 of 5 stars		$151.27
+0.5%		$161.70
+6.9%		+1.1%$351.26B$87.03B22.85104,000
KMB
Kimberly-Clark
3.4017 of 5 stars		$96.91
+1.6%		$117.00
+20.7%		-18.4%$32.27B$16.58B16.5036,000
PEP
PepsiCo
4.5861 of 5 stars		$127.15
+1.2%		$150.20
+18.1%		-16.1%$173.45B$96.90B16.66306,000
TSLA
Tesla
3.3489 of 5 stars		$380.39
+0.4%		$412.01
+8.3%		-7.4%$1.50T$103.62B352.50134,785
WMT
Walmart
4.621 of 5 stars		$106.85
+1.7%		$131.74
+23.3%		+9.3%$847.58B$735.84B38.572,100,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:PG) was last updated on 10/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's New Dollar
Porter Stansberry says President Trump has signed an executive order initiating what he calls a full U.S. doll...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
The end may be near for these iconic stocks
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, says two forces - AI disruption and fracturing global trade - are ...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s Why Trump Won’t End The Iran War
Trump has called an Iran deal close 38 times since the war began, yet the fighting keeps flaring back up. O...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel