Kimberly-Clark (KMB) Competitors

Kimberly-Clark presently has a consensus target price of $117.93, suggesting a potential upside of 14.34%. Church & Dwight has a consensus target price of $104.41, suggesting a potential upside of 7.49%. Given Kimberly-Clark's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Kimberly-Clark is more favorable than Church & Dwight.

In the previous week, Kimberly-Clark had 2 more articles in the media than Church & Dwight. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Kimberly-Clark and 8 mentions for Church & Dwight. Church & Dwight's average media sentiment score of 1.56 beat Kimberly-Clark's score of 0.94 indicating that Church & Dwight is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.25, indicating that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Church & Dwight has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Kimberly-Clark has higher revenue and earnings than Church & Dwight. Kimberly-Clark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Church & Dwight, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Kimberly-Clark pays an annual dividend of $5.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Church & Dwight pays an annual dividend of $1.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Kimberly-Clark pays out 87.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Church & Dwight pays out 39.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kimberly-Clark has raised its dividend for 54 consecutive years and Church & Dwight has raised its dividend for 29 consecutive years. Kimberly-Clark is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Church & Dwight has a net margin of 11.96% compared to Kimberly-Clark's net margin of 11.79%. Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 143.92% beat Church & Dwight's return on equity.

76.3% of Kimberly-Clark shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of Church & Dwight shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Kimberly-Clark shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Church & Dwight shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.25, indicating that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.33, indicating that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

76.3% of Kimberly-Clark shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Colgate-Palmolive shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Kimberly-Clark shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Colgate-Palmolive shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Kimberly-Clark has a net margin of 11.79% compared to Colgate-Palmolive's net margin of 9.68%. Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 464.63% beat Kimberly-Clark's return on equity.

Colgate-Palmolive has higher revenue and earnings than Kimberly-Clark. Kimberly-Clark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Colgate-Palmolive, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Colgate-Palmolive had 12 more articles in the media than Kimberly-Clark. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Colgate-Palmolive and 10 mentions for Kimberly-Clark. Colgate-Palmolive's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Kimberly-Clark's score of 0.94 indicating that Colgate-Palmolive is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Kimberly-Clark pays an annual dividend of $5.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Colgate-Palmolive pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Kimberly-Clark pays out 87.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Colgate-Palmolive pays out 84.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kimberly-Clark has increased its dividend for 54 consecutive years and Colgate-Palmolive has increased its dividend for 63 consecutive years.

Kimberly-Clark currently has a consensus price target of $117.93, suggesting a potential upside of 14.34%. Colgate-Palmolive has a consensus price target of $99.00, suggesting a potential upside of 12.10%. Given Kimberly-Clark's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Kimberly-Clark is more favorable than Colgate-Palmolive.

Kimberly-Clark has a net margin of 11.79% compared to Kenvue's net margin of 10.76%. Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 143.92% beat Kenvue's return on equity.

Kimberly-Clark currently has a consensus price target of $117.93, suggesting a potential upside of 14.34%. Kenvue has a consensus price target of $19.27, suggesting a potential upside of 4.61%. Given Kimberly-Clark's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kimberly-Clark is more favorable than Kenvue.

76.3% of Kimberly-Clark shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.6% of Kenvue shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Kimberly-Clark shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Kenvue shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Kimberly-Clark has higher revenue and earnings than Kenvue. Kimberly-Clark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kenvue, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Kimberly-Clark had 2 more articles in the media than Kenvue. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Kimberly-Clark and 8 mentions for Kenvue. Kenvue's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Kimberly-Clark's score of 0.94 indicating that Kenvue is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Kimberly-Clark pays an annual dividend of $5.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Kenvue pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Kimberly-Clark pays out 87.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kenvue pays out 96.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kimberly-Clark has increased its dividend for 54 consecutive years and Kenvue has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Kimberly-Clark is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.25, meaning that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kenvue has a beta of 0.46, meaning that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 18.44% compared to Kimberly-Clark's net margin of 11.79%. Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 143.92% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity.

Procter & Gamble presently has a consensus price target of $161.19, suggesting a potential upside of 11.38%. Kimberly-Clark has a consensus price target of $117.93, suggesting a potential upside of 14.34%. Given Kimberly-Clark's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Kimberly-Clark is more favorable than Procter & Gamble.

In the previous week, Procter & Gamble had 44 more articles in the media than Kimberly-Clark. MarketBeat recorded 54 mentions for Procter & Gamble and 10 mentions for Kimberly-Clark. Procter & Gamble's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Kimberly-Clark's score of 0.94 indicating that Procter & Gamble is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.39, suggesting that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.25, suggesting that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market.

65.8% of Procter & Gamble shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.3% of Kimberly-Clark shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Procter & Gamble shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Kimberly-Clark shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Procter & Gamble has higher revenue and earnings than Kimberly-Clark. Kimberly-Clark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Procter & Gamble, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Procter & Gamble pays an annual dividend of $4.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Kimberly-Clark pays an annual dividend of $5.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Procter & Gamble pays out 65.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kimberly-Clark pays out 87.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Procter & Gamble has increased its dividend for 70 consecutive years and Kimberly-Clark has increased its dividend for 54 consecutive years.