Go Pro

Central Garden & Pet (CENTA) Competitors

Central Garden & Pet logo
$35.57 -0.50 (-1.39%)
As of 12:19 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CENTA vs. CENT, REYN, WDFC, SPB, and ENR

Should you buy Central Garden & Pet stock or one of its competitors? Central Garden & Pet's main competitors and comparable companies include Central Garden & Pet (CENT), Reynolds Consumer Products (REYN), WD-40 (WDFC), Spectrum Brands (SPB), and Energizer (ENR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "household products" industry.

How does Central Garden & Pet compare to Central Garden & Pet?

Central Garden & Pet (NASDAQ:CENT) and Central Garden & Pet (NASDAQ:CENTA) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

Central Garden & Pet presently has a consensus target price of $54.00, suggesting a potential upside of 31.37%. Central Garden & Pet has a consensus target price of $46.67, suggesting a potential upside of 31.20%. Given Central Garden & Pet's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Central Garden & Pet is more favorable than Central Garden & Pet.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Central Garden & Pet
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Central Garden & Pet
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Central Garden & Pet has a beta of 0.62, meaning that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Central Garden & Pet has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Central Garden & Pet5.39% 11.13% 4.93%
Central Garden & Pet 5.39%11.13%4.93%

Central Garden & Pet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Central Garden & Pet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Central Garden & Pet$3.13B0.82$162.84M$2.6815.34
Central Garden & Pet$3.13B0.71$162.84M$2.6813.27

16.1% of Central Garden & Pet shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.8% of Central Garden & Pet shares are held by institutional investors. 8.2% of Central Garden & Pet shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.3% of Central Garden & Pet shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Central Garden & Pet had 1 more articles in the media than Central Garden & Pet. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Central Garden & Pet and 1 mentions for Central Garden & Pet. Central Garden & Pet's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Central Garden & Pet's score of 0.00 indicating that Central Garden & Pet is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Central Garden & Pet
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Central Garden & Pet
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Central Garden & Pet beats Central Garden & Pet on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Central Garden & Pet compare to Reynolds Consumer Products?

Reynolds Consumer Products (NASDAQ:REYN) and Central Garden & Pet (NASDAQ:CENTA) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Reynolds Consumer Products has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Central Garden & Pet has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Reynolds Consumer Products currently has a consensus price target of $25.60, indicating a potential upside of 16.55%. Central Garden & Pet has a consensus price target of $46.67, indicating a potential upside of 31.20%. Given Central Garden & Pet's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Central Garden & Pet is more favorable than Reynolds Consumer Products.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Reynolds Consumer Products
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13
Central Garden & Pet
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Reynolds Consumer Products has higher revenue and earnings than Central Garden & Pet. Central Garden & Pet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Reynolds Consumer Products, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Reynolds Consumer Products$3.72B1.24$301M$1.6413.39
Central Garden & Pet$3.13B0.71$162.84M$2.6813.27

Reynolds Consumer Products has a net margin of 9.11% compared to Central Garden & Pet's net margin of 5.39%. Reynolds Consumer Products' return on equity of 16.03% beat Central Garden & Pet's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Reynolds Consumer Products9.11% 16.03% 7.28%
Central Garden & Pet 5.39%11.13%4.93%

26.8% of Reynolds Consumer Products shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.8% of Central Garden & Pet shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Reynolds Consumer Products shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 20.3% of Central Garden & Pet shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Reynolds Consumer Products had 1 more articles in the media than Central Garden & Pet. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Reynolds Consumer Products and 1 mentions for Central Garden & Pet. Reynolds Consumer Products' average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat Central Garden & Pet's score of 0.67 indicating that Reynolds Consumer Products is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Reynolds Consumer Products
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Central Garden & Pet
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Reynolds Consumer Products beats Central Garden & Pet on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Central Garden & Pet compare to WD-40?

WD-40 (NASDAQ:WDFC) and Central Garden & Pet (NASDAQ:CENTA) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

WD-40 presently has a consensus price target of $305.00, suggesting a potential upside of 49.89%. Central Garden & Pet has a consensus price target of $46.67, suggesting a potential upside of 31.20%. Given WD-40's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe WD-40 is more favorable than Central Garden & Pet.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
WD-40
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Central Garden & Pet
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

In the previous week, WD-40 had 6 more articles in the media than Central Garden & Pet. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for WD-40 and 1 mentions for Central Garden & Pet. WD-40's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Central Garden & Pet's score of 0.67 indicating that WD-40 is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
WD-40
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Central Garden & Pet
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

91.5% of WD-40 shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.8% of Central Garden & Pet shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of WD-40 shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.3% of Central Garden & Pet shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

WD-40 has a beta of 0.27, suggesting that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Central Garden & Pet has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

WD-40 has a net margin of 13.23% compared to Central Garden & Pet's net margin of 5.39%. WD-40's return on equity of 33.53% beat Central Garden & Pet's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WD-4013.23% 33.53% 18.97%
Central Garden & Pet 5.39%11.13%4.93%

Central Garden & Pet has higher revenue and earnings than WD-40. Central Garden & Pet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WD-40, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WD-40$619.98M4.40$90.99M$6.5830.92
Central Garden & Pet$3.13B0.71$162.84M$2.6813.27

Summary

WD-40 beats Central Garden & Pet on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Central Garden & Pet compare to Spectrum Brands?

Central Garden & Pet (NASDAQ:CENTA) and Spectrum Brands (NYSE:SPB) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and media sentiment.

Central Garden & Pet has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Spectrum Brands has a beta of 0.65, indicating that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Spectrum Brands had 3 more articles in the media than Central Garden & Pet. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Spectrum Brands and 1 mentions for Central Garden & Pet. Spectrum Brands' average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Central Garden & Pet's score of 0.67 indicating that Spectrum Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Central Garden & Pet
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Spectrum Brands
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Central Garden & Pet has higher revenue and earnings than Spectrum Brands. Central Garden & Pet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Spectrum Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Central Garden & Pet$3.13B0.71$162.84M$2.6813.27
Spectrum Brands$2.81B0.73$99.70M$3.2827.10

Central Garden & Pet presently has a consensus target price of $46.67, indicating a potential upside of 31.20%. Spectrum Brands has a consensus target price of $98.83, indicating a potential upside of 11.20%. Given Central Garden & Pet's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Central Garden & Pet is more favorable than Spectrum Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Central Garden & Pet
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Spectrum Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Central Garden & Pet has a net margin of 5.39% compared to Spectrum Brands' net margin of 2.76%. Central Garden & Pet's return on equity of 11.13% beat Spectrum Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Central Garden & Pet5.39% 11.13% 4.93%
Spectrum Brands 2.76%10.06%5.49%

50.8% of Central Garden & Pet shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.3% of Central Garden & Pet shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Spectrum Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Central Garden & Pet beats Spectrum Brands on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Central Garden & Pet compare to Energizer?

Energizer (NYSE:ENR) and Central Garden & Pet (NASDAQ:CENTA) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment and valuation.

Central Garden & Pet has a net margin of 5.39% compared to Energizer's net margin of 2.73%. Energizer's return on equity of 122.63% beat Central Garden & Pet's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Energizer2.73% 122.63% 4.72%
Central Garden & Pet 5.39%11.13%4.93%

Energizer currently has a consensus target price of $21.83, indicating a potential upside of 3.52%. Central Garden & Pet has a consensus target price of $46.67, indicating a potential upside of 31.20%. Given Central Garden & Pet's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Central Garden & Pet is more favorable than Energizer.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Energizer
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.86
Central Garden & Pet
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

93.7% of Energizer shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.8% of Central Garden & Pet shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Energizer shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 20.3% of Central Garden & Pet shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Energizer had 2 more articles in the media than Central Garden & Pet. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Energizer and 1 mentions for Central Garden & Pet. Energizer's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Central Garden & Pet's score of 0.67 indicating that Energizer is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Energizer
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Central Garden & Pet
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Energizer has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Central Garden & Pet. Central Garden & Pet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energizer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Energizer$2.95B0.49$239M$1.1817.87
Central Garden & Pet$3.13B0.71$162.84M$2.6813.27

Energizer has a beta of 0.77, indicating that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Central Garden & Pet has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Central Garden & Pet beats Energizer on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Central Garden & Pet News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CENTA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CENTA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CENTA vs. The Competition

MetricCentral Garden & PetHousehold Products IndustryConsumer Staples SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$2.23B$10.06B$15.69B$12.90B
Dividend YieldN/A2.77%3.22%9.14%
P/E Ratio13.2714.1513.3825.42
Price / Sales0.714,480,852.27262,948.8993.88
Price / Cash8.6314.9056.3235.62
Price / Book1.4113.274.876.44
Net Income$162.84M$552.50M$835.37M$358.18M
7 Day Performance-2.33%-1.18%-0.65%1.10%
1 Month Performance-8.93%0.29%-0.62%-0.41%
1 Year Performance4.74%3.76%11.48%13.98%

Central Garden & Pet Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CENTA
Central Garden & Pet
4.0274 of 5 stars
$35.57
-1.4%
$46.67
+31.2%
+5.6%$2.23B$3.13B13.277,000
CENT
Central Garden & Pet
2.8137 of 5 stars
$41.88
+0.4%
$54.00
+29.0%
+10.8%$2.62B$3.13B15.626,000
REYN
Reynolds Consumer Products
3.961 of 5 stars
$21.82
-0.1%
$25.60
+17.4%
-8.2%$4.60B$3.72B13.316,000
WDFC
WD-40
4.6278 of 5 stars
$206.97
-1.7%
$305.00
+47.4%
-4.8%$2.78B$619.98M31.48580
SPB
Spectrum Brands
2.7167 of 5 stars
$88.56
+0.2%
$98.83
+11.6%
+55.8%$2.04B$2.81B27.003,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CENTA) was last updated on 9/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners