S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
pixel
pixel
S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
pixel
pixel
S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
pixel
pixel
S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
pixel
pixel
Log in
NASDAQ:WDFC

WD-40 Competitors

$319.56
+7.61 (+2.44 %)
(As of 03/5/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$301.99
Now: $319.56
$321.51
50-Day Range
$278.40
MA: $308.10
$332.29
52-Week Range
$151.16
Now: $319.56
$333.42
Volume121,880 shs
Average Volume104,344 shs
Market Capitalization$4.37 billion
P/E Ratio72.63
Dividend Yield0.86%
Beta-0.05

Competitors

WD-40 (NASDAQ:WDFC) Vs. CAG, CPB, SAM, SJM, LW, and NTCO

Should you be buying WDFC stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "consumer staples" are considered alternatives and competitors to WD-40, including Conagra Brands (CAG), Campbell Soup (CPB), The Boston Beer (SAM), The J. M. Smucker (SJM), Lamb Weston (LW), and Natura &Co (NTCO).

Conagra Brands (NYSE:CAG) and WD-40 (NASDAQ:WDFC) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Conagra Brands and WD-40's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Conagra Brands9.67%16.50%6.01%
WD-4012.30%33.97%14.82%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Conagra Brands and WD-40, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Conagra Brands16112.22
WD-4001002.00

Conagra Brands presently has a consensus target price of $35.4444, indicating a potential downside of 0.16%. WD-40 has a consensus target price of $353.00, indicating a potential upside of 10.46%. Given WD-40's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe WD-40 is more favorable than Conagra Brands.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

82.1% of Conagra Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.4% of WD-40 shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Conagra Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of WD-40 shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Conagra Brands pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. WD-40 pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Conagra Brands pays out 48.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. WD-40 pays out 60.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Conagra Brands has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and WD-40 has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Conagra Brands is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Volatility & Risk

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its share price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, WD-40 has a beta of -0.05, suggesting that its share price is 105% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Conagra Brands and WD-40's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Conagra Brands$11.05 billion1.57$840.10 million$2.2815.57
WD-40$423.35 million10.33$55.91 million$4.4072.63

Conagra Brands has higher revenue and earnings than WD-40. Conagra Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WD-40, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Conagra Brands beats WD-40 on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Campbell Soup (NYSE:CPB) and WD-40 (NASDAQ:WDFC) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Volatility & Risk

Campbell Soup has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its share price is 49% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, WD-40 has a beta of -0.05, suggesting that its share price is 105% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Campbell Soup and WD-40's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Campbell Soup20.02%37.44%7.94%
WD-4012.30%33.97%14.82%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Campbell Soup and WD-40, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Campbell Soup49301.94
WD-4001002.00

Campbell Soup presently has a consensus target price of $50.9333, indicating a potential upside of 9.32%. WD-40 has a consensus target price of $353.00, indicating a potential upside of 10.46%. Given WD-40's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe WD-40 is more favorable than Campbell Soup.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Campbell Soup and WD-40's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Campbell Soup$8.69 billion1.62$1.63 billion$2.9515.79
WD-40$423.35 million10.33$55.91 million$4.4072.63

Campbell Soup has higher revenue and earnings than WD-40. Campbell Soup is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WD-40, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

51.5% of Campbell Soup shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.4% of WD-40 shares are held by institutional investors. 35.6% of Campbell Soup shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of WD-40 shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Campbell Soup pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. WD-40 pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Campbell Soup pays out 50.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. WD-40 pays out 60.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Campbell Soup has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and WD-40 has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Campbell Soup is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Campbell Soup beats WD-40 on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Boston Beer (NYSE:SAM) and WD-40 (NASDAQ:WDFC) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and risk.

Volatility and Risk

The Boston Beer has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, WD-40 has a beta of -0.05, suggesting that its stock price is 105% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares The Boston Beer and WD-40's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The Boston Beer10.77%20.36%13.84%
WD-4012.30%33.97%14.82%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for The Boston Beer and WD-40, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The Boston Beer14702.50
WD-4001002.00

The Boston Beer currently has a consensus price target of $1,048.50, indicating a potential downside of 3.66%. WD-40 has a consensus price target of $353.00, indicating a potential upside of 10.46%. Given WD-40's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe WD-40 is more favorable than The Boston Beer.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares The Boston Beer and WD-40's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Boston Beer$1.25 billion10.68$110.04 million$9.17118.68
WD-40$423.35 million10.33$55.91 million$4.4072.63

The Boston Beer has higher revenue and earnings than WD-40. WD-40 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Boston Beer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

68.8% of The Boston Beer shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.4% of WD-40 shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.1% of The Boston Beer shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of WD-40 shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

The Boston Beer beats WD-40 on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

The J. M. Smucker (NYSE:SJM) and WD-40 (NASDAQ:WDFC) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and risk.

Risk and Volatility

The J. M. Smucker has a beta of 0.26, indicating that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, WD-40 has a beta of -0.05, indicating that its stock price is 105% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares The J. M. Smucker and WD-40's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The J. M. Smucker10.92%13.31%6.55%
WD-4012.30%33.97%14.82%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for The J. M. Smucker and WD-40, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The J. M. Smucker29001.82
WD-4001002.00

The J. M. Smucker currently has a consensus price target of $116.00, indicating a potential downside of 1.98%. WD-40 has a consensus price target of $353.00, indicating a potential upside of 10.46%. Given WD-40's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe WD-40 is more favorable than The J. M. Smucker.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares The J. M. Smucker and WD-40's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The J. M. Smucker$7.80 billion1.66$779.50 million$8.7613.51
WD-40$423.35 million10.33$55.91 million$4.4072.63

The J. M. Smucker has higher revenue and earnings than WD-40. The J. M. Smucker is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WD-40, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

81.5% of The J. M. Smucker shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.4% of WD-40 shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of The J. M. Smucker shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of WD-40 shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

The J. M. Smucker pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. WD-40 pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. The J. M. Smucker pays out 41.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. WD-40 pays out 60.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The J. M. Smucker has raised its dividend for 19 consecutive years and WD-40 has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. The J. M. Smucker is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Lamb Weston (NYSE:LW) and WD-40 (NASDAQ:WDFC) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Lamb Weston has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, WD-40 has a beta of -0.05, indicating that its stock price is 105% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Lamb Weston and WD-40's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Lamb Weston8.33%95.26%7.20%
WD-4012.30%33.97%14.82%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Lamb Weston and WD-40, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Lamb Weston03202.40
WD-4001002.00

Lamb Weston currently has a consensus price target of $65.20, indicating a potential downside of 24.01%. WD-40 has a consensus price target of $353.00, indicating a potential upside of 10.46%. Given WD-40's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe WD-40 is more favorable than Lamb Weston.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Lamb Weston and WD-40's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lamb Weston$3.79 billion3.31$365.90 million$2.5034.32
WD-40$423.35 million10.33$55.91 million$4.4072.63

Lamb Weston has higher revenue and earnings than WD-40. Lamb Weston is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WD-40, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

86.4% of Lamb Weston shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.4% of WD-40 shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Lamb Weston shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of WD-40 shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Lamb Weston pays an annual dividend of $0.94 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. WD-40 pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Lamb Weston pays out 37.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. WD-40 pays out 60.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lamb Weston has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and WD-40 has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Lamb Weston is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Natura &Co (NYSE:NTCO) and WD-40 (NASDAQ:WDFC) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Natura &Co and WD-40's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Natura &CoN/AN/AN/A
WD-4012.30%33.97%14.82%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Natura &Co and WD-40, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Natura &Co10001.00
WD-4001002.00

WD-40 has a consensus price target of $353.00, indicating a potential upside of 10.46%. Given WD-40's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe WD-40 is more favorable than Natura &Co.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

4.8% of Natura &Co shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.4% of WD-40 shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of WD-40 shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Natura &Co and WD-40's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Natura &Co$3.66 billion3.31$39.40 million$0.09195.56
WD-40$423.35 million10.33$55.91 million$4.4072.63

WD-40 has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Natura &Co. WD-40 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Natura &Co, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

WD-40 beats Natura &Co on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.


WD-40 Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Conagra Brands logo
CAG
Conagra Brands
2.1$35.50+2.3%$17.34 billion$11.05 billion15.64
Campbell Soup logo
CPB
Campbell Soup
1.7$46.59+1.7%$14.11 billion$8.69 billion8.01Upcoming Earnings
Dividend Announcement
News Coverage
The Boston Beer logo
SAM
The Boston Beer
1.5$1,088.32+5.3%$13.35 billion$1.25 billion77.74Gap Up
The J. M. Smucker logo
SJM
The J. M. Smucker
2.1$118.34+1.8%$12.97 billion$7.80 billion15.33Unusual Options Activity
Lamb Weston logo
LW
Lamb Weston
1.8$85.80+3.5%$12.56 billion$3.79 billion42.48News Coverage
Gap Up
Natura &Co logo
NTCO
Natura &Co
0.1$17.60+5.9%$12.10 billion$3.66 billion195.56High Trading Volume
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Darling Ingredients logo
DAR
Darling Ingredients
1.8$73.53+7.6%$11.93 billion$3.36 billion24.93Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
High Trading Volume
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Gap Up
Aramark logo
ARMK
Aramark
1.4$41.24+1.5%$10.47 billion$12.83 billion-22.54High Trading Volume
Newell Brands logo
NWL
Newell Brands
1.4$24.64+2.8%$10.46 billion$9.71 billion-94.77Decrease in Short Interest
Molson Coors Beverage logo
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage
1.3$46.16+1.7%$10.01 billion$13.01 billion17.16Increase in Short Interest
Coca-Cola FEMSA logo
KOF
Coca-Cola FEMSA
1.6$46.50+2.3%$9.77 billion$10.11 billion22.46Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
Beyond Meat logo
BYND
Beyond Meat
1.1$138.30+1.4%$8.70 billion$297.90 million-307.33Analyst Upgrade
The New York Times logo
NYT
The New York Times
1.8$50.72+0.5%$8.48 billion$1.81 billion53.39
US Foods logo
USFD
US Foods
1.5$38.00+1.7%$8.40 billion$25.94 billion-60.32
Albertsons Companies logo
ACI
Albertsons Companies
2.1$17.75+1.0%$8.26 billion$62.46 billion0.00Analyst Downgrade
Service Co. International logo
SCI
Service Co. International
1.9$47.50+2.8%$8.05 billion$3.23 billion18.63Gap Up
Post logo
POST
Post
1.5$103.53+2.6%$6.66 billion$5.70 billion-3,449.85Insider Selling
Ingredion logo
INGR
Ingredion
2.1$91.53+2.6%$6.14 billion$6.21 billion18.09
Freshpet logo
FRPT
Freshpet
1.7$139.36+0.5%$6.01 billion$245.86 million1,267.02Analyst Report
Coty logo
COTY
Coty
1.3$7.82+0.0%$6.00 billion$4.72 billion-6.74Increase in Short Interest
Pilgrim's Pride logo
PPC
Pilgrim's Pride
1.5$24.27+2.1%$5.91 billion$11.41 billion31.93Analyst Upgrade
Ollie's Bargain Outlet logo
OLLI
Ollie's Bargain Outlet
1.0$84.77+3.1%$5.55 billion$1.41 billion24.50News Coverage
Helen of Troy logo
HELE
Helen of Troy
1.5$225.70+2.3%$5.51 billion$1.71 billion25.05Analyst Downgrade
News Coverage
Gap Up
National Beverage logo
FIZZ
National Beverage
1.3$54.71+10.7%$5.10 billion$1.00 billion15.90Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Up
Lancaster Colony logo
LANC
Lancaster Colony
2.0$180.38+2.8%$4.97 billion$1.33 billion37.27Gap Up
Flowers Foods logo
FLO
Flowers Foods
1.3$22.96+2.4%$4.86 billion$4.12 billion49.91Gap Up
51job logo
JOBS
51job
1.9$64.65+1.6%$4.36 billion$574.57 million30.50High Trading Volume
Gap Down
The Hain Celestial Group logo
HAIN
The Hain Celestial Group
1.5$43.57+3.7%$4.35 billion$2.05 billion167.58Gap Up
Nomad Foods logo
NOMD
Nomad Foods
1.8$24.95+1.0%$4.30 billion$2.60 billion20.79
Leslie's logo
LESL
Leslie's
1.5$22.51+7.0%$4.21 billion$1.11 billion53.60Gap Up
Celsius logo
CELH
Celsius
1.5$51.87+2.3%$3.76 billion$75.15 million741.11Upcoming Earnings
Gap Down
Hillenbrand logo
HI
Hillenbrand
2.0$49.81+4.8%$3.74 billion$2.52 billion-61.49Analyst Revision
Gap Up
Sanderson Farms logo
SAFM
Sanderson Farms
1.9$161.02+0.7%$3.60 billion$3.56 billion127.79Analyst Report
Insider Selling
BRF logo
BRFS
BRF
1.3$4.19+3.6%$3.40 billion$8.13 billion13.52Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
Grocery Outlet logo
GO
Grocery Outlet
1.4$36.03+1.6%$3.39 billion$2.56 billion37.93Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Unusual Options Activity
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Compañía Cervecerías Unidas logo
CCU
Compañía Cervecerías Unidas
1.4$17.95+1.2%$3.32 billion$2.41 billion26.40
Energizer logo
ENR
Energizer
2.6$44.67+4.1%$3.05 billion$2.74 billion-28.27Insider Buying
Gap Up
J & J Snack Foods logo
JJSF
J & J Snack Foods
1.6$159.84+2.9%$3.03 billion$1.02 billion168.25News Coverage
Gap Up
TreeHouse Foods logo
THS
TreeHouse Foods
1.2$53.19+3.0%$2.97 billion$4.29 billion-531.90Gap Up
Utz Brands logo
UTZ
Utz Brands
1.6$24.08+3.5%$2.90 billionN/A0.00Gap Up
The Simply Good Foods logo
SMPL
The Simply Good Foods
1.8$30.33+4.6%$2.90 billion$816.64 million48.14Gap Up
JW.B
John Wiley & Sons
0.6$51.42+1.3%$2.88 billion$1.83 billion-74.52
Medifast logo
MED
Medifast
2.3$243.16+1.4%$2.86 billion$713.67 million30.43Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Nu Skin Enterprises logo
NUS
Nu Skin Enterprises
2.1$52.09+4.6%$2.65 billion$2.42 billion17.54Gap Up
Coca-Cola Consolidated logo
COKE
Coca-Cola Consolidated
0.9$271.74+5.2%$2.55 billion$4.83 billion26.72Gap Up
Inter Parfums logo
IPAR
Inter Parfums
1.6$71.47+2.1%$2.26 billion$713.51 million71.47Earnings Announcement
Dividend Cut
Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Tootsie Roll Industries logo
TR
Tootsie Roll Industries
0.9$32.78+2.0%$2.18 billion$523.62 million37.52Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Up
Vector Group logo
VGR
Vector Group
1.5$13.92+3.7%$2.13 billion$1.90 billion31.64Dividend Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
Gap Up
Hostess Brands logo
TWNK
Hostess Brands
1.4$14.98+2.6%$1.96 billion$907.67 million29.96Gap Up
Industrias Bachoco logo
IBA
Industrias Bachoco
1.4$38.66+1.7%$1.93 billion$3.26 billion14.32Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Down
This page was last updated on 3/7/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.