Colgate-Palmolive (CL) Competitors

Kimberly-Clark presently has a consensus target price of $117.36, indicating a potential upside of 24.62%. Colgate-Palmolive has a consensus target price of $98.94, indicating a potential upside of 17.60%. Given Kimberly-Clark's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Kimberly-Clark is more favorable than Colgate-Palmolive.

Kimberly-Clark pays an annual dividend of $5.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Colgate-Palmolive pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Kimberly-Clark pays out 87.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Colgate-Palmolive pays out 84.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kimberly-Clark has raised its dividend for 54 consecutive years and Colgate-Palmolive has raised its dividend for 63 consecutive years.

76.3% of Kimberly-Clark shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Colgate-Palmolive shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Kimberly-Clark shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Colgate-Palmolive shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Kimberly-Clark had 10 more articles in the media than Colgate-Palmolive. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Kimberly-Clark and 10 mentions for Colgate-Palmolive. Colgate-Palmolive's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Kimberly-Clark's score of 0.63 indicating that Colgate-Palmolive is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Kimberly-Clark has a net margin of 11.79% compared to Colgate-Palmolive's net margin of 9.68%. Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 464.63% beat Kimberly-Clark's return on equity.

Colgate-Palmolive has higher revenue and earnings than Kimberly-Clark. Kimberly-Clark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Colgate-Palmolive, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.26, indicating that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.33, indicating that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

Mondelez International has higher revenue and earnings than Colgate-Palmolive. Mondelez International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Colgate-Palmolive, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Colgate-Palmolive has a net margin of 9.68% compared to Mondelez International's net margin of 8.86%. Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 464.63% beat Mondelez International's return on equity.

In the previous week, Colgate-Palmolive had 2 more articles in the media than Mondelez International. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Colgate-Palmolive and 8 mentions for Mondelez International. Colgate-Palmolive's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Mondelez International's score of 0.65 indicating that Colgate-Palmolive is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.33, suggesting that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mondelez International has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

Colgate-Palmolive presently has a consensus price target of $98.94, suggesting a potential upside of 17.60%. Mondelez International has a consensus price target of $66.89, suggesting a potential upside of 15.35%. Given Colgate-Palmolive's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Colgate-Palmolive is more favorable than Mondelez International.

80.4% of Colgate-Palmolive shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.3% of Mondelez International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Colgate-Palmolive shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Mondelez International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Colgate-Palmolive pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Mondelez International pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Colgate-Palmolive pays out 84.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Mondelez International pays out 76.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Colgate-Palmolive has raised its dividend for 63 consecutive years and Mondelez International has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Mondelez International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Colgate-Palmolive pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Church & Dwight pays an annual dividend of $1.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Colgate-Palmolive pays out 84.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Church & Dwight pays out 39.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive has raised its dividend for 63 consecutive years and Church & Dwight has raised its dividend for 29 consecutive years. Colgate-Palmolive is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Colgate-Palmolive has higher revenue and earnings than Church & Dwight. Church & Dwight is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Colgate-Palmolive, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Colgate-Palmolive presently has a consensus price target of $98.94, suggesting a potential upside of 17.60%. Church & Dwight has a consensus price target of $104.41, suggesting a potential upside of 10.82%. Given Colgate-Palmolive's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Colgate-Palmolive is more favorable than Church & Dwight.

In the previous week, Colgate-Palmolive had 10 more articles in the media than Church & Dwight. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Colgate-Palmolive and 0 mentions for Church & Dwight. Colgate-Palmolive's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Church & Dwight's score of 0.00 indicating that Colgate-Palmolive is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.33, suggesting that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Church & Dwight has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

80.4% of Colgate-Palmolive shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of Church & Dwight shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Colgate-Palmolive shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Church & Dwight shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Church & Dwight has a net margin of 11.96% compared to Colgate-Palmolive's net margin of 9.68%. Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 464.63% beat Church & Dwight's return on equity.

Colgate-Palmolive has a net margin of 9.68% compared to Clorox's net margin of 8.74%. Clorox's return on equity of 522.23% beat Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity.

Colgate-Palmolive presently has a consensus target price of $98.94, indicating a potential upside of 17.60%. Clorox has a consensus target price of $101.40, indicating a potential upside of 26.83%. Given Clorox's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Clorox is more favorable than Colgate-Palmolive.

Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.33, indicating that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clorox has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Colgate-Palmolive has higher revenue and earnings than Clorox. Clorox is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Colgate-Palmolive, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Colgate-Palmolive had 1 more articles in the media than Clorox. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Colgate-Palmolive and 9 mentions for Clorox. Colgate-Palmolive's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Clorox's score of 0.06 indicating that Colgate-Palmolive is being referred to more favorably in the media.

80.4% of Colgate-Palmolive shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.5% of Clorox shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Colgate-Palmolive shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Clorox shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Colgate-Palmolive pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Clorox pays an annual dividend of $5.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Colgate-Palmolive pays out 84.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Clorox pays out 103.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Colgate-Palmolive has raised its dividend for 63 consecutive years and Clorox has raised its dividend for 47 consecutive years.