NYSE:PHGKoninklijke Philips Competitors & Alternatives

ASML (NASDAQ:ASML) and Koninklijke Philips (NYSE:PHG) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Dividends

ASML pays an annual dividend of $2.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Koninklijke Philips pays an annual dividend of $0.93 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. ASML pays out 36.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Koninklijke Philips pays out 41.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. ASML has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Koninklijke Philips has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

17.9% of ASML shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.6% of Koninklijke Philips shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares ASML and Koninklijke Philips' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

ASML has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Koninklijke Philips has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for ASML and Koninklijke Philips, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

ASML presently has a consensus target price of $340.00, suggesting a potential downside of 14.11%. Koninklijke Philips has a consensus target price of $51.00, suggesting a potential upside of 7.98%. Given Koninklijke Philips' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Koninklijke Philips is more favorable than ASML.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares ASML and Koninklijke Philips' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

ASML has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Koninklijke Philips. Koninklijke Philips is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASML, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

ASML beats Koninklijke Philips on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

T-Mobile Us (NASDAQ:TMUS) and Koninklijke Philips (NYSE:PHG) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for T-Mobile Us and Koninklijke Philips, as reported by MarketBeat.

T-Mobile Us presently has a consensus price target of $108.25, indicating a potential upside of 1.12%. Koninklijke Philips has a consensus price target of $51.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.98%. Given Koninklijke Philips' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Koninklijke Philips is more favorable than T-Mobile Us.

Profitability

This table compares T-Mobile Us and Koninklijke Philips' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

23.6% of T-Mobile Us shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.6% of Koninklijke Philips shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of T-Mobile Us shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares T-Mobile Us and Koninklijke Philips' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

T-Mobile Us has higher revenue and earnings than Koninklijke Philips. Koninklijke Philips is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than T-Mobile Us, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

T-Mobile Us has a beta of 0.3, meaning that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Koninklijke Philips has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

T-Mobile Us beats Koninklijke Philips on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Koninklijke Philips (NYSE:PHG) and China Mobile (NYSE:CHL) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Koninklijke Philips and China Mobile's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

8.6% of Koninklijke Philips shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.2% of China Mobile shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Koninklijke Philips has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its share price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Mobile has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its share price is 49% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Koninklijke Philips and China Mobile, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Koninklijke Philips presently has a consensus target price of $51.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.98%. Given Koninklijke Philips' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Koninklijke Philips is more favorable than China Mobile.

Dividends

Koninklijke Philips pays an annual dividend of $0.93 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. China Mobile pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. Koninklijke Philips pays out 41.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. China Mobile pays out 53.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Koninklijke Philips has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and China Mobile has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Koninklijke Philips and China Mobile's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

China Mobile has higher revenue and earnings than Koninklijke Philips. China Mobile is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Koninklijke Philips, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Koninklijke Philips beats China Mobile on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Koninklijke Philips (NYSE:PHG) and Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and profitability.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

8.6% of Koninklijke Philips shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.8% of Broadcom shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Broadcom shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Koninklijke Philips has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Broadcom has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Koninklijke Philips and Broadcom, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Koninklijke Philips presently has a consensus target price of $51.00, suggesting a potential upside of 7.98%. Broadcom has a consensus target price of $343.3871, suggesting a potential upside of 7.50%. Given Koninklijke Philips' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Koninklijke Philips is more favorable than Broadcom.

Profitability

This table compares Koninklijke Philips and Broadcom's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Koninklijke Philips pays an annual dividend of $0.93 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Broadcom pays an annual dividend of $13.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Koninklijke Philips pays out 41.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Broadcom pays out 74.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Koninklijke Philips has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Broadcom has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Broadcom is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Koninklijke Philips and Broadcom's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Broadcom has higher revenue and earnings than Koninklijke Philips. Broadcom is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Koninklijke Philips, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Broadcom beats Koninklijke Philips on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Shopify (NYSE:SHOP) and Koninklijke Philips (NYSE:PHG) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and risk.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Shopify and Koninklijke Philips' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Koninklijke Philips has higher revenue and earnings than Shopify. Shopify is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Koninklijke Philips, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

60.3% of Shopify shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.6% of Koninklijke Philips shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Shopify and Koninklijke Philips' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Shopify and Koninklijke Philips, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Shopify presently has a consensus target price of $694.6296, suggesting a potential downside of 32.68%. Koninklijke Philips has a consensus target price of $51.00, suggesting a potential upside of 7.98%. Given Koninklijke Philips' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Koninklijke Philips is more favorable than Shopify.

Volatility & Risk

Shopify has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its share price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Koninklijke Philips has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its share price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Koninklijke Philips beats Shopify on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Texas Instruments (NASDAQ:TXN) and Koninklijke Philips (NYSE:PHG) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Dividends

Texas Instruments pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Koninklijke Philips pays an annual dividend of $0.93 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Texas Instruments pays out 68.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Koninklijke Philips pays out 41.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Texas Instruments has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years and Koninklijke Philips has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Texas Instruments is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Risk & Volatility

Texas Instruments has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Koninklijke Philips has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Texas Instruments and Koninklijke Philips, as provided by MarketBeat.

Texas Instruments presently has a consensus target price of $122.9565, suggesting a potential downside of 5.80%. Koninklijke Philips has a consensus target price of $51.00, suggesting a potential upside of 7.98%. Given Koninklijke Philips' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Koninklijke Philips is more favorable than Texas Instruments.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Texas Instruments and Koninklijke Philips' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Texas Instruments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Koninklijke Philips. Koninklijke Philips is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Texas Instruments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

83.9% of Texas Instruments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.6% of Koninklijke Philips shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Texas Instruments shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Texas Instruments and Koninklijke Philips' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Texas Instruments beats Koninklijke Philips on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.