Free Trial

iRhythm Technologies (IRTC) Competitors

iRhythm Technologies logo
$102.15 -3.35 (-3.18%)
As of 01:04 PM Eastern

IRTC vs. SOLV, SNN, PEN, GKOS, and STVN

Should you buy iRhythm Technologies stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares iRhythm Technologies with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with iRhythm Technologies include Solventum (SOLV), Smith & Nephew SNATS (SNN), Penumbra (PEN), Glaukos (GKOS), and Stevanato Group (STVN). These companies are all part of the "medical equipment" industry.

How does iRhythm Technologies compare to Solventum?

iRhythm Technologies (NASDAQ:IRTC) and Solventum (NYSE:SOLV) are both medical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and valuation.

Solventum has a net margin of 17.33% compared to iRhythm Technologies' net margin of -3.53%. Solventum's return on equity of 23.51% beat iRhythm Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
iRhythm Technologies-3.53% -10.26% -1.39%
Solventum 17.33%23.51%7.63%

iRhythm Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $189.69, indicating a potential upside of 85.70%. Solventum has a consensus price target of $84.25, indicating a potential upside of 8.35%. Given iRhythm Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe iRhythm Technologies is more favorable than Solventum.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
iRhythm Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.94
Solventum
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

iRhythm Technologies has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Solventum has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Solventum had 1 more articles in the media than iRhythm Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Solventum and 5 mentions for iRhythm Technologies. iRhythm Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Solventum's score of 0.38 indicating that iRhythm Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
iRhythm Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Solventum
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Solventum has higher revenue and earnings than iRhythm Technologies. iRhythm Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Solventum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
iRhythm Technologies$747.14M4.49-$44.55M-$0.86N/A
Solventum$8.33B1.62$1.56B$8.169.53

Summary

Solventum beats iRhythm Technologies on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does iRhythm Technologies compare to Smith & Nephew SNATS?

Smith & Nephew SNATS (NYSE:SNN) and iRhythm Technologies (NASDAQ:IRTC) are both medical companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Smith & Nephew SNATS has a net margin of 0.00% compared to iRhythm Technologies' net margin of -3.53%. Smith & Nephew SNATS's return on equity of 0.00% beat iRhythm Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Smith & Nephew SNATSN/A N/A N/A
iRhythm Technologies -3.53%-10.26%-1.39%

Smith & Nephew SNATS has higher revenue and earnings than iRhythm Technologies.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Smith & Nephew SNATS$6.16B2.07$625MN/AN/A
iRhythm Technologies$747.14M4.49-$44.55M-$0.86N/A

Smith & Nephew SNATS has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, iRhythm Technologies has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, iRhythm Technologies had 4 more articles in the media than Smith & Nephew SNATS. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for iRhythm Technologies and 1 mentions for Smith & Nephew SNATS. iRhythm Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Smith & Nephew SNATS's score of 0.00 indicating that iRhythm Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Smith & Nephew SNATS
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
iRhythm Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

25.6% of Smith & Nephew SNATS shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Smith & Nephew SNATS shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of iRhythm Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Smith & Nephew SNATS presently has a consensus target price of $30.93, indicating a potential upside of 3.32%. iRhythm Technologies has a consensus target price of $189.69, indicating a potential upside of 85.70%. Given iRhythm Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe iRhythm Technologies is more favorable than Smith & Nephew SNATS.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Smith & Nephew SNATS
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
iRhythm Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.94

Summary

iRhythm Technologies beats Smith & Nephew SNATS on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does iRhythm Technologies compare to Penumbra?

Penumbra (NYSE:PEN) and iRhythm Technologies (NASDAQ:IRTC) are both medical companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Penumbra has higher revenue and earnings than iRhythm Technologies. iRhythm Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Penumbra, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Penumbra$1.40B8.93$177.69M$4.3473.45
iRhythm Technologies$747.14M4.49-$44.55M-$0.86N/A

Penumbra has a net margin of 11.76% compared to iRhythm Technologies' net margin of -3.53%. Penumbra's return on equity of 10.87% beat iRhythm Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Penumbra11.76% 10.87% 8.45%
iRhythm Technologies -3.53%-10.26%-1.39%

Penumbra has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, iRhythm Technologies has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Penumbra presently has a consensus price target of $361.33, suggesting a potential upside of 13.35%. iRhythm Technologies has a consensus price target of $189.69, suggesting a potential upside of 85.70%. Given iRhythm Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe iRhythm Technologies is more favorable than Penumbra.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Penumbra
0 Sell rating(s)
14 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.18
iRhythm Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.94

In the previous week, iRhythm Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than Penumbra. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for iRhythm Technologies and 2 mentions for Penumbra. Penumbra's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat iRhythm Technologies' score of 0.79 indicating that Penumbra is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Penumbra
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
iRhythm Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

88.9% of Penumbra shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Penumbra shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of iRhythm Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Penumbra beats iRhythm Technologies on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does iRhythm Technologies compare to Glaukos?

iRhythm Technologies (NASDAQ:IRTC) and Glaukos (NYSE:GKOS) are both mid-cap medical companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

In the previous week, iRhythm Technologies had 2 more articles in the media than Glaukos. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for iRhythm Technologies and 3 mentions for Glaukos. iRhythm Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Glaukos' score of -0.27 indicating that iRhythm Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
iRhythm Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Glaukos
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

iRhythm Technologies has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Glaukos has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

iRhythm Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Glaukos. iRhythm Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Glaukos, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
iRhythm Technologies$747.14M4.49-$44.55M-$0.86N/A
Glaukos$507.44M12.96-$187.69M-$3.28N/A

99.0% of Glaukos shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of iRhythm Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Glaukos shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

iRhythm Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $189.69, indicating a potential upside of 85.70%. Glaukos has a consensus target price of $146.17, indicating a potential upside of 30.53%. Given iRhythm Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe iRhythm Technologies is more favorable than Glaukos.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
iRhythm Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.94
Glaukos
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.79

iRhythm Technologies has a net margin of -3.53% compared to Glaukos' net margin of -34.34%. Glaukos' return on equity of -6.92% beat iRhythm Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
iRhythm Technologies-3.53% -10.26% -1.39%
Glaukos -34.34%-6.92%-5.25%

Summary

iRhythm Technologies beats Glaukos on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does iRhythm Technologies compare to Stevanato Group?

Stevanato Group (NYSE:STVN) and iRhythm Technologies (NASDAQ:IRTC) are both mid-cap medical companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

Stevanato Group has a net margin of 11.76% compared to iRhythm Technologies' net margin of -3.53%. Stevanato Group's return on equity of 10.27% beat iRhythm Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Stevanato Group11.76% 10.27% 6.08%
iRhythm Technologies -3.53%-10.26%-1.39%

iRhythm Technologies has a consensus price target of $189.69, suggesting a potential upside of 85.70%. Given iRhythm Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe iRhythm Technologies is more favorable than Stevanato Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Stevanato Group
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
iRhythm Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.94

In the previous week, iRhythm Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than Stevanato Group. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for iRhythm Technologies and 4 mentions for Stevanato Group. iRhythm Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Stevanato Group's score of 0.67 indicating that iRhythm Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Stevanato Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
iRhythm Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Stevanato Group has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, iRhythm Technologies has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Stevanato Group has higher revenue and earnings than iRhythm Technologies. iRhythm Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stevanato Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Stevanato Group€1.20B4.66€158.21M€0.5931.37
iRhythm Technologies$747.14M4.49-$44.55M-$0.86N/A

Summary

Stevanato Group beats iRhythm Technologies on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get iRhythm Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for IRTC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding IRTC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

IRTC vs. The Competition

MetriciRhythm TechnologiesMEDICAL INFO SYS IndustryMedical SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$3.36B$1.54B$6.26B$12.40B
Dividend YieldN/AN/A2.69%5.29%
P/E Ratio-118.7877.5922.3724.16
Price / Sales4.4923.52547.57124.65
Price / CashN/A23.1542.3157.88
Price / Book21.554.759.796.69
Net Income-$44.55M-$54.76M$3.56B$336.98M
7 Day Performance-8.30%-0.58%-1.27%0.45%
1 Month Performance-15.44%4.81%3.58%4.95%
1 Year Performance-29.54%-3.31%27.13%34.01%

iRhythm Technologies Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
IRTC
iRhythm Technologies
4.0368 of 5 stars
$102.15
-3.2%
$189.69
+85.7%
-25.0%$3.36B$747.14MN/A2,400
SOLV
Solventum
3.016 of 5 stars
$75.13
-1.1%
$84.25
+12.1%
+4.5%$13.15B$8.26B9.2120,000
SNN
Smith & Nephew SNATS
1.8213 of 5 stars
$29.72
-0.2%
$30.93
+4.1%
+0.8%$12.71B$6.16BN/A16,988
PEN
Penumbra
2.1736 of 5 stars
$318.46
-0.2%
$361.33
+13.5%
+24.2%$12.54B$1.40B73.384,700
GKOS
Glaukos
2.8204 of 5 stars
$103.08
-3.2%
$146.17
+41.8%
+17.1%$6.26B$507.44MN/A1,094

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:IRTC) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners