Go Pro

iRhythm Technologies (IRTC) Competitors

iRhythm Technologies logo
$117.17 0.00 (0.00%)
Closing price 07/31/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$117.10 -0.07 (-0.06%)
As of 07/31/2026 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

IRTC vs. BAX, SNN, PEN, PODD, and GMED

Should you buy iRhythm Technologies stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares iRhythm Technologies with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with iRhythm Technologies include Baxter International (BAX), Smith & Nephew SNATS (SNN), Penumbra (PEN), Insulet (PODD), and Globus Medical (GMED). These companies are all part of the "healthcare equipment" industry.

How does iRhythm Technologies compare to Baxter International?

iRhythm Technologies (NASDAQ:IRTC) and Baxter International (NYSE:BAX) are both healthcare companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

iRhythm Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Baxter International. iRhythm Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baxter International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
iRhythm Technologies$747.14M5.15-$44.55M-$0.86N/A
Baxter International$11.24B1.20-$957M-$2.07N/A

iRhythm Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $184.71, indicating a potential upside of 57.65%. Baxter International has a consensus price target of $22.45, indicating a potential downside of 14.30%. Given iRhythm Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe iRhythm Technologies is more favorable than Baxter International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
iRhythm Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.94
Baxter International
3 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.92

In the previous week, Baxter International had 42 more articles in the media than iRhythm Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 51 mentions for Baxter International and 9 mentions for iRhythm Technologies. iRhythm Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Baxter International's score of 0.76 indicating that iRhythm Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
iRhythm Technologies
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Baxter International
18 Very Positive mention(s)
8 Positive mention(s)
17 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

iRhythm Technologies has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baxter International has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

90.2% of Baxter International shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of iRhythm Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Baxter International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

iRhythm Technologies has a net margin of -3.53% compared to Baxter International's net margin of -9.27%. Baxter International's return on equity of 16.57% beat iRhythm Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
iRhythm Technologies-3.53% -10.26% -1.39%
Baxter International -9.27%16.57%5.24%

Summary

iRhythm Technologies beats Baxter International on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does iRhythm Technologies compare to Smith & Nephew SNATS?

iRhythm Technologies (NASDAQ:IRTC) and Smith & Nephew SNATS (NYSE:SNN) are both healthcare companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

25.6% of Smith & Nephew SNATS shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of iRhythm Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Smith & Nephew SNATS shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Smith & Nephew SNATS has a net margin of 0.00% compared to iRhythm Technologies' net margin of -3.53%. Smith & Nephew SNATS's return on equity of 0.00% beat iRhythm Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
iRhythm Technologies-3.53% -10.26% -1.39%
Smith & Nephew SNATS N/A N/A N/A

Smith & Nephew SNATS has higher revenue and earnings than iRhythm Technologies.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
iRhythm Technologies$747.14M5.15-$44.55M-$0.86N/A
Smith & Nephew SNATS$6.16B2.16$625MN/AN/A

iRhythm Technologies has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Smith & Nephew SNATS has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, iRhythm Technologies had 4 more articles in the media than Smith & Nephew SNATS. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for iRhythm Technologies and 5 mentions for Smith & Nephew SNATS. iRhythm Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Smith & Nephew SNATS's score of 0.68 indicating that iRhythm Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
iRhythm Technologies
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Smith & Nephew SNATS
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

iRhythm Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $184.71, suggesting a potential upside of 57.65%. Smith & Nephew SNATS has a consensus price target of $30.93, suggesting a potential downside of 1.92%. Given iRhythm Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe iRhythm Technologies is more favorable than Smith & Nephew SNATS.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
iRhythm Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.94
Smith & Nephew SNATS
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17

Summary

iRhythm Technologies beats Smith & Nephew SNATS on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does iRhythm Technologies compare to Penumbra?

Penumbra (NYSE:PEN) and iRhythm Technologies (NASDAQ:IRTC) are both healthcare companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment and dividends.

Penumbra currently has a consensus price target of $367.07, indicating a potential upside of 14.21%. iRhythm Technologies has a consensus price target of $184.71, indicating a potential upside of 57.65%. Given iRhythm Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe iRhythm Technologies is more favorable than Penumbra.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Penumbra
1 Sell rating(s)
13 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.12
iRhythm Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.94

Penumbra has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, iRhythm Technologies has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Penumbra has higher revenue and earnings than iRhythm Technologies. iRhythm Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Penumbra, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Penumbra$1.40B9.02$177.69M$4.0778.97
iRhythm Technologies$747.14M5.15-$44.55M-$0.86N/A

Penumbra has a net margin of 10.67% compared to iRhythm Technologies' net margin of -3.53%. Penumbra's return on equity of 10.50% beat iRhythm Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Penumbra10.67% 10.50% 8.17%
iRhythm Technologies -3.53%-10.26%-1.39%

In the previous week, Penumbra had 4 more articles in the media than iRhythm Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Penumbra and 9 mentions for iRhythm Technologies. iRhythm Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Penumbra's score of 0.92 indicating that iRhythm Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Penumbra
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
iRhythm Technologies
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

88.9% of Penumbra shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Penumbra shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of iRhythm Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Penumbra beats iRhythm Technologies on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does iRhythm Technologies compare to Insulet?

iRhythm Technologies (NASDAQ:IRTC) and Insulet (NASDAQ:PODD) are both healthcare companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

iRhythm Technologies has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Insulet has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Insulet has a net margin of 10.44% compared to iRhythm Technologies' net margin of -3.53%. Insulet's return on equity of 26.87% beat iRhythm Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
iRhythm Technologies-3.53% -10.26% -1.39%
Insulet 10.44%26.87%12.01%

In the previous week, Insulet had 38 more articles in the media than iRhythm Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 47 mentions for Insulet and 9 mentions for iRhythm Technologies. iRhythm Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Insulet's score of 0.46 indicating that iRhythm Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
iRhythm Technologies
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Insulet
15 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
29 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

iRhythm Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $184.71, indicating a potential upside of 57.65%. Insulet has a consensus price target of $233.38, indicating a potential upside of 41.14%. Given iRhythm Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe iRhythm Technologies is more favorable than Insulet.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
iRhythm Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.94
Insulet
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
21 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.68

Insulet has higher revenue and earnings than iRhythm Technologies. iRhythm Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Insulet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
iRhythm Technologies$747.14M5.15-$44.55M-$0.86N/A
Insulet$2.90B3.95$247.10M$4.3038.45

Summary

Insulet beats iRhythm Technologies on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does iRhythm Technologies compare to Globus Medical?

Globus Medical (NYSE:GMED) and iRhythm Technologies (NASDAQ:IRTC) are both healthcare companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, earnings and institutional ownership.

Globus Medical has a net margin of 18.92% compared to iRhythm Technologies' net margin of -3.53%. Globus Medical's return on equity of 13.46% beat iRhythm Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Globus Medical18.92% 13.46% 11.65%
iRhythm Technologies -3.53%-10.26%-1.39%

In the previous week, Globus Medical had 13 more articles in the media than iRhythm Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Globus Medical and 9 mentions for iRhythm Technologies. Globus Medical's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat iRhythm Technologies' score of 1.09 indicating that Globus Medical is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Globus Medical
16 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
iRhythm Technologies
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Globus Medical has higher revenue and earnings than iRhythm Technologies. iRhythm Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Globus Medical, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Globus Medical$2.94B3.65$537.87M$4.3018.37
iRhythm Technologies$747.14M5.15-$44.55M-$0.86N/A

Globus Medical presently has a consensus target price of $102.08, indicating a potential upside of 29.23%. iRhythm Technologies has a consensus target price of $184.71, indicating a potential upside of 57.65%. Given iRhythm Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe iRhythm Technologies is more favorable than Globus Medical.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Globus Medical
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.76
iRhythm Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.94

95.2% of Globus Medical shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.4% of Globus Medical shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of iRhythm Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Globus Medical has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, iRhythm Technologies has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Globus Medical beats iRhythm Technologies on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get iRhythm Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for IRTC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding IRTC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

IRTC vs. The Competition

MetriciRhythm TechnologiesHealthcare Equipment & Supplies IndustryHealthcare SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$3.85B$5.58B$6.86B$12.42B
Dividend YieldN/A1.79%2.59%10.03%
P/E Ratio-136.2423.11282.3024.66
Price / Sales5.1556.88564.9876.51
Price / CashN/A32.5328.6046.71
Price / Book24.726.2910.926.07
Net Income-$44.55M$151.15M$3.49B$347.99M
7 Day Performance4.48%0.96%-0.64%-0.44%
1 Month Performance-7.36%-3.50%-5.24%-4.81%
1 Year Performance-28.97%2.31%61.98%18.61%

iRhythm Technologies Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
IRTC
iRhythm Technologies
4.2522 of 5 stars
$117.17
flat
$184.71
+57.6%
-29.0%$3.85B$747.14MN/A2,400
BAX
Baxter International
1.3604 of 5 stars
$26.20
-2.1%
$22.45
-14.3%
+19.3%$13.82B$11.47BN/A37,500
SNN
Smith & Nephew SNATS
1.9857 of 5 stars
$31.53
-2.5%
$30.93
-1.9%
+2.1%$13.66B$6.16BN/A16,988
PEN
Penumbra
2.9928 of 5 stars
$321.40
+0.5%
$367.07
+14.2%
+32.5%$12.58B$1.50B78.974,700
PODD
Insulet
4.722 of 5 stars
$165.35
-0.2%
$233.38
+41.1%
-42.0%$11.48B$2.71B38.455,400

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:IRTC) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners