SRH Total Return Fund (STEW) Competitors

55.5% of StepStone Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.6% of SRH Total Return Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 15.7% of StepStone Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of SRH Total Return Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

StepStone Group pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. SRH Total Return Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. StepStone Group pays out -14.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. StepStone Group has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

StepStone Group has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SRH Total Return Fund has a beta of 0.82, suggesting that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

SRH Total Return Fund has a net margin of 0.00% compared to StepStone Group's net margin of -30.53%. StepStone Group's return on equity of 43.38% beat SRH Total Return Fund's return on equity.

In the previous week, StepStone Group had 2 more articles in the media than SRH Total Return Fund. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for StepStone Group and 2 mentions for SRH Total Return Fund. SRH Total Return Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat StepStone Group's score of 0.30 indicating that SRH Total Return Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

SRH Total Return Fund has lower revenue, but higher earnings than StepStone Group.

StepStone Group presently has a consensus price target of $70.88, indicating a potential upside of 45.24%. Given StepStone Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe StepStone Group is more favorable than SRH Total Return Fund.

In the previous week, SRH Total Return Fund and SRH Total Return Fund both had 2 articles in the media. Hamilton Lane's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat SRH Total Return Fund's score of 0.97 indicating that Hamilton Lane is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

SRH Total Return Fund has a beta of 0.82, suggesting that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hamilton Lane has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

15.6% of SRH Total Return Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.4% of Hamilton Lane shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of SRH Total Return Fund shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 24.0% of Hamilton Lane shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hamilton Lane has a consensus target price of $131.71, suggesting a potential upside of 26.24%. Given Hamilton Lane's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hamilton Lane is more favorable than SRH Total Return Fund.

Hamilton Lane has higher revenue and earnings than SRH Total Return Fund.

SRH Total Return Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Hamilton Lane pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Hamilton Lane pays out 36.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hamilton Lane has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

Hamilton Lane has a net margin of 32.14% compared to SRH Total Return Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Hamilton Lane's return on equity of 25.10% beat SRH Total Return Fund's return on equity.

In the previous week, SRH Total Return Fund and SRH Total Return Fund both had 2 articles in the media. SRH Total Return Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Blue Owl Capital's score of 0.76 indicating that SRH Total Return Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

SRH Total Return Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Blue Owl Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.0%. Blue Owl Capital pays out 221.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Blue Owl Capital has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Blue Owl Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

15.6% of SRH Total Return Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.8% of Blue Owl Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of SRH Total Return Fund shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Blue Owl Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Blue Owl Capital has higher revenue and earnings than SRH Total Return Fund.

SRH Total Return Fund has a beta of 0.82, meaning that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blue Owl Capital has a beta of 0.62, meaning that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Blue Owl Capital has a net margin of 16.99% compared to SRH Total Return Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Blue Owl Capital's return on equity of 9.49% beat SRH Total Return Fund's return on equity.

Blue Owl Capital has a consensus target price of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 15.15%. Given Blue Owl Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Blue Owl Capital is more favorable than SRH Total Return Fund.

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has higher revenue and earnings than SRH Total Return Fund.

SRH Total Return Fund has a beta of 0.82, suggesting that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

SRH Total Return Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.5%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund pays out 242.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a consensus price target of $24.78, indicating a potential upside of 0.36%. Given Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Blackstone Secured Lending Fund is more favorable than SRH Total Return Fund.

15.6% of SRH Total Return Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.5% of Blackstone Secured Lending Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of SRH Total Return Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Blackstone Secured Lending Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a net margin of 21.51% compared to SRH Total Return Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's return on equity of 11.86% beat SRH Total Return Fund's return on equity.

In the previous week, Blackstone Secured Lending Fund had 2 more articles in the media than SRH Total Return Fund. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Blackstone Secured Lending Fund and 2 mentions for SRH Total Return Fund. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat SRH Total Return Fund's score of 0.97 indicating that Blackstone Secured Lending Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.