Free Trial

Ag Growth International (AFN) Competitors

Ag Growth International logo
C$22.72 -0.65 (-2.78%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

AFN vs. BUI, LEV, CSX, GPV, and CUB

Should you buy Ag Growth International stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Ag Growth International with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Ag Growth International include Buhler Industries (BUI), Lion Electric (LEV), Clean Seed Capital Group (CSX), GreenPower Motor (GPV), and CubicFarm Systems (CUB). These companies are all part of the "farm & heavy construction machinery" industry.

How does Ag Growth International compare to Buhler Industries?

Buhler Industries (TSE:BUI) and Ag Growth International (TSE:AFN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and valuation.

Ag Growth International has higher revenue and earnings than Buhler Industries. Ag Growth International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Buhler Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Buhler IndustriesC$239.87M0.00-C$1.03M-C$0.04N/A
Ag Growth InternationalC$1.42B0.30C$23.99M-C$2.86N/A

Buhler Industries has a beta of 0.19, suggesting that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ag Growth International has a beta of 1.041055, suggesting that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

Ag Growth International has a consensus price target of C$28.22, suggesting a potential upside of 24.22%. Given Ag Growth International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ag Growth International is more favorable than Buhler Industries.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Buhler Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ag Growth International
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44

In the previous week, Buhler Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ag Growth International'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Buhler Industries Neutral
Ag Growth International Neutral

Buhler Industries has a net margin of -0.43% compared to Ag Growth International's net margin of -3.80%. Buhler Industries' return on equity of -1.21% beat Ag Growth International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Buhler Industries-0.43% -1.21% -0.06%
Ag Growth International -3.80%-20.06%6.34%

16.4% of Ag Growth International shares are owned by institutional investors. 96.8% of Buhler Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Ag Growth International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Ag Growth International beats Buhler Industries on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ag Growth International compare to Lion Electric?

Ag Growth International (TSE:AFN) and Lion Electric (TSE:LEV) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Ag Growth International has higher revenue and earnings than Lion Electric. Ag Growth International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lion Electric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ag Growth InternationalC$1.42B0.30C$23.99M-C$2.86N/A
Lion ElectricC$226.53M0.00-C$117.36M-C$0.71N/A

Ag Growth International currently has a consensus target price of C$28.22, indicating a potential upside of 24.22%. Given Ag Growth International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ag Growth International is more favorable than Lion Electric.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ag Growth International
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44
Lion Electric
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Ag Growth International has a beta of 1.041055, suggesting that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lion Electric has a beta of 2.59, suggesting that its stock price is 159% more volatile than the broader market.

16.4% of Ag Growth International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.7% of Lion Electric shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Ag Growth International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 46.2% of Lion Electric shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Ag Growth International's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Lion Electric'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ag Growth International Neutral
Lion Electric Neutral

Ag Growth International has a net margin of -3.80% compared to Lion Electric's net margin of -40.93%. Ag Growth International's return on equity of -20.06% beat Lion Electric's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ag Growth International-3.80% -20.06% 6.34%
Lion Electric -40.93%-26.07%-7.50%

Summary

Ag Growth International beats Lion Electric on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ag Growth International compare to Clean Seed Capital Group?

Ag Growth International (TSE:AFN) and Clean Seed Capital Group (CVE:CSX) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

Ag Growth International has higher revenue and earnings than Clean Seed Capital Group. Ag Growth International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clean Seed Capital Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ag Growth InternationalC$1.42B0.30C$23.99M-C$2.86N/A
Clean Seed Capital GroupN/AN/AN/A-C$0.04N/A

Ag Growth International presently has a consensus price target of C$28.22, indicating a potential upside of 24.22%. Given Ag Growth International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Ag Growth International is more favorable than Clean Seed Capital Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ag Growth International
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44
Clean Seed Capital Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Ag Growth International's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Clean Seed Capital Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ag Growth International Neutral
Clean Seed Capital Group Neutral

Ag Growth International has a beta of 1.041055, suggesting that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clean Seed Capital Group has a beta of 1.92, suggesting that its stock price is 92% more volatile than the broader market.

Clean Seed Capital Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ag Growth International's net margin of -3.80%. Clean Seed Capital Group's return on equity of 187.28% beat Ag Growth International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ag Growth International-3.80% -20.06% 6.34%
Clean Seed Capital Group N/A 187.28%-13.90%

16.4% of Ag Growth International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Ag Growth International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.3% of Clean Seed Capital Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ag Growth International pays an annual dividend of C$0.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Clean Seed Capital Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 977.8%. Ag Growth International pays out -15.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Clean Seed Capital Group pays out -2,200.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Clean Seed Capital Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Clean Seed Capital Group beats Ag Growth International on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ag Growth International compare to GreenPower Motor?

GreenPower Motor (CVE:GPV) and Ag Growth International (TSE:AFN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

GreenPower Motor has a beta of 3.680754, indicating that its share price is 268% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ag Growth International has a beta of 1.041055, indicating that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

Ag Growth International has a net margin of -3.80% compared to GreenPower Motor's net margin of -105.00%. GreenPower Motor's return on equity of 502.36% beat Ag Growth International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GreenPower Motor-105.00% 502.36% -24.58%
Ag Growth International -3.80%-20.06%6.34%

0.0% of GreenPower Motor shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.4% of Ag Growth International shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.9% of GreenPower Motor shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Ag Growth International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ag Growth International has higher revenue and earnings than GreenPower Motor. Ag Growth International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GreenPower Motor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GreenPower MotorC$18.40M0.35-C$17.53M-C$6.10N/A
Ag Growth InternationalC$1.42B0.30C$23.99M-C$2.86N/A

Ag Growth International has a consensus target price of C$28.22, suggesting a potential upside of 24.22%. Given Ag Growth International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ag Growth International is more favorable than GreenPower Motor.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
GreenPower Motor
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ag Growth International
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44

In the previous week, GreenPower Motor's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ag Growth International'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
GreenPower Motor Neutral
Ag Growth International Neutral

Summary

Ag Growth International beats GreenPower Motor on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ag Growth International compare to CubicFarm Systems?

Ag Growth International (TSE:AFN) and CubicFarm Systems (TSE:CUB) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Ag Growth International's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CubicFarm Systems'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ag Growth International Neutral
CubicFarm Systems Neutral

Ag Growth International presently has a consensus price target of C$28.22, indicating a potential upside of 24.22%. Given Ag Growth International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Ag Growth International is more favorable than CubicFarm Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ag Growth International
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44
CubicFarm Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Ag Growth International has higher revenue and earnings than CubicFarm Systems. Ag Growth International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CubicFarm Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ag Growth InternationalC$1.42B0.30C$23.99M-C$2.86N/A
CubicFarm SystemsC$4.01M0.00-C$40.74M-C$0.22N/A

16.4% of Ag Growth International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.9% of CubicFarm Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Ag Growth International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.5% of CubicFarm Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CubicFarm Systems has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ag Growth International's net margin of -3.80%. Ag Growth International's return on equity of -20.06% beat CubicFarm Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ag Growth International-3.80% -20.06% 6.34%
CubicFarm Systems N/A -7,339.46%-37.95%

Ag Growth International has a beta of 1.041055, meaning that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CubicFarm Systems has a beta of 2.5, meaning that its stock price is 150% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ag Growth International beats CubicFarm Systems on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Ag Growth International News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for AFN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AFN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

AFN vs. The Competition

MetricAg Growth InternationalFarm & Heavy Construction Machinery IndustryIndustrials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$428.52MC$6.67BC$9.54BC$12.06B
Dividend Yield2.59%3.16%3.53%6.20%
P/E Ratio-7.9412.1825.8137.70
Price / Sales0.3028.155,130.1011.34
Price / Cash18.7565.8028.2382.29
Price / Book1.691.255.224.54
Net IncomeC$23.99MC$29.49MC$795.50MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-0.53%2.32%1.67%1.15%
1 Month Performance17.42%3.79%4.38%2.96%
1 Year Performance-41.09%-0.48%32.66%54.12%

Ag Growth International Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
AFN
Ag Growth International
2.8528 of 5 stars
C$22.72
-2.8%
C$28.22
+24.2%
-39.7%C$428.52MC$1.42BN/AN/A
BUI
Buhler Industries
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$182.25MC$239.87MN/A862
LEV
Lion Electric
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$54.87MC$226.53MN/A1,000
CSX
Clean Seed Capital Group
N/AC$0.09
+5.9%
N/A+0.0%C$8.42MN/AN/A22,500
GPV
GreenPower Motor
N/AC$2.10
-7.9%
N/A-65.6%C$6.40MC$18.40MN/A112

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:AFN) was last updated on 5/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners