Free Trial

Alamos Gold (AGI) Competitors

Alamos Gold logo
C$54.72 -0.03 (-0.05%)
As of 06/2/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

AGI vs. WPM, FNV, PAAS, IAG, and AG

Should you buy Alamos Gold stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Alamos Gold with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Alamos Gold include Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM), Franco-Nevada (FNV), Pan American Silver (PAAS), iA Financial (IAG), and First Majestic Silver (AG). These companies are all part of the "precious metals" industry.

How does Alamos Gold compare to Wheaton Precious Metals?

Alamos Gold (TSE:AGI) and Wheaton Precious Metals (TSE:WPM) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Alamos Gold currently has a consensus target price of C$76.20, suggesting a potential upside of 39.25%. Wheaton Precious Metals has a consensus target price of C$205.63, suggesting a potential upside of 14.07%. Given Alamos Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than Wheaton Precious Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Alamos Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.20
Wheaton Precious Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.13

Alamos Gold has a beta of 1.783973, indicating that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Wheaton Precious Metals has a beta of 1.379974, indicating that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

53.2% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.6% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Alamos Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Wheaton Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of C$0.69 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Alamos Gold pays out 4.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Wheaton Precious Metals pays out 17.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Wheaton Precious Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Alamos Gold. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wheaton Precious Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alamos GoldC$2.07B11.09C$174.87MC$2.5121.80
Wheaton Precious MetalsC$2.75B29.82C$426.03MC$3.9645.56

Wheaton Precious Metals has a net margin of 65.55% compared to Alamos Gold's net margin of 51.42%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 25.24% beat Wheaton Precious Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alamos Gold51.42% 25.24% 5.85%
Wheaton Precious Metals 65.55%21.32%5.35%

In the previous week, Alamos Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Wheaton Precious Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Alamos Gold Neutral
Wheaton Precious Metals Neutral

Summary

Wheaton Precious Metals beats Alamos Gold on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Alamos Gold compare to Franco-Nevada?

Franco-Nevada (TSE:FNV) and Alamos Gold (TSE:AGI) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Alamos Gold has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Franco-Nevada. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Franco-NevadaC$2.11B29.91-C$442.97MC$7.1045.98
Alamos GoldC$2.07B11.09C$174.87MC$2.5121.80

Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.965818, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alamos Gold has a beta of 1.783973, suggesting that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market.

Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of C$1.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Alamos Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Franco-Nevada pays out 22.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alamos Gold pays out 4.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Franco-Nevada currently has a consensus price target of C$355.44, indicating a potential upside of 8.88%. Alamos Gold has a consensus price target of C$76.20, indicating a potential upside of 39.25%. Given Alamos Gold's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than Franco-Nevada.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Franco-Nevada
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.60
Alamos Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.20

65.6% of Franco-Nevada shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.2% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Franco-Nevada shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Franco-Nevada has a net margin of 65.14% compared to Alamos Gold's net margin of 51.42%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 25.24% beat Franco-Nevada's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Franco-Nevada65.14% 18.67% -4.57%
Alamos Gold 51.42%25.24%5.85%

In the previous week, Franco-Nevada had 1 more articles in the media than Alamos Gold. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Franco-Nevada and 0 mentions for Alamos Gold. Franco-Nevada's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Alamos Gold'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Franco-Nevada Neutral
Alamos Gold Neutral

Summary

Franco-Nevada beats Alamos Gold on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Alamos Gold compare to Pan American Silver?

Pan American Silver (TSE:PAAS) and Alamos Gold (TSE:AGI) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

44.4% of Pan American Silver shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.2% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Pan American Silver shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pan American Silver pays an annual dividend of C$0.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Alamos Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Pan American Silver pays out 17.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alamos Gold pays out 4.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Alamos Gold has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pan American Silver. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pan American Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pan American SilverC$4B8.05-C$33.47MC$3.1724.09
Alamos GoldC$2.07B11.09C$174.87MC$2.5121.80

Pan American Silver has a beta of 2.044882, suggesting that its stock price is 104% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alamos Gold has a beta of 1.783973, suggesting that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market.

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 51.42% compared to Pan American Silver's net margin of 31.69%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 25.24% beat Pan American Silver's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pan American Silver31.69% 19.65% 0.43%
Alamos Gold 51.42%25.24%5.85%

In the previous week, Pan American Silver's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Alamos Gold's score of 0.00 indicating that Pan American Silver is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pan American Silver Positive
Alamos Gold Neutral

Pan American Silver presently has a consensus target price of C$81.75, indicating a potential upside of 7.03%. Alamos Gold has a consensus target price of C$76.20, indicating a potential upside of 39.25%. Given Alamos Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than Pan American Silver.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pan American Silver
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Alamos Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.20

Summary

Alamos Gold beats Pan American Silver on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Alamos Gold compare to iA Financial?

Alamos Gold (TSE:AGI) and iA Financial (TSE:IAG) are both large-cap precious metals companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Alamos Gold presently has a consensus price target of C$76.20, indicating a potential upside of 39.25%. iA Financial has a consensus price target of C$177.78, indicating a potential upside of 3.08%. Given Alamos Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than iA Financial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Alamos Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.20
iA Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Alamos Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. iA Financial pays an annual dividend of C$3.87 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Alamos Gold pays out 4.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. iA Financial pays out 35.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, iA Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Alamos Gold's score of 0.00 indicating that iA Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Alamos Gold Neutral
iA Financial Positive

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 51.42% compared to iA Financial's net margin of 9.87%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 25.24% beat iA Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alamos Gold51.42% 25.24% 5.85%
iA Financial 9.87%12.80%0.68%

53.2% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.0% of iA Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of iA Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 1.783973, meaning that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, iA Financial has a beta of 0.924346, meaning that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

iA Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Alamos Gold. iA Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alamos Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alamos GoldC$2.07B11.09C$174.87MC$2.5121.80
iA FinancialC$8.43B1.83C$990.15MC$10.8015.97

Summary

Alamos Gold beats iA Financial on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Alamos Gold compare to First Majestic Silver?

Alamos Gold (TSE:AGI) and First Majestic Silver (TSE:AG) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Alamos Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. First Majestic Silver pays an annual dividend of C$0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Alamos Gold pays out 4.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. First Majestic Silver pays out 3.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Alamos Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled First Majestic Silver'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Alamos Gold Neutral
First Majestic Silver Neutral

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 51.42% compared to First Majestic Silver's net margin of 19.45%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 25.24% beat First Majestic Silver's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alamos Gold51.42% 25.24% 5.85%
First Majestic Silver 19.45%10.82%-1.24%

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than First Majestic Silver. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Majestic Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alamos GoldC$2.07B11.09C$174.87MC$2.5121.80
First Majestic SilverC$1.50B9.55-C$92.07MC$0.5949.17

Alamos Gold has a beta of 1.783973, meaning that its share price is 78% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Majestic Silver has a beta of 2.851151, meaning that its share price is 185% more volatile than the broader market.

Alamos Gold currently has a consensus target price of C$76.20, indicating a potential upside of 39.25%. First Majestic Silver has a consensus target price of C$33.40, indicating a potential upside of 15.13%. Given Alamos Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than First Majestic Silver.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Alamos Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.20
First Majestic Silver
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

53.2% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.8% of First Majestic Silver shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of First Majestic Silver shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Alamos Gold beats First Majestic Silver on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Alamos Gold News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for AGI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AGI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

AGI vs. The Competition

MetricAlamos GoldGold IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$22.99BC$5.11BC$4.94BC$12.18B
Dividend Yield0.40%5.58%4.95%6.21%
P/E Ratio21.8037.9223.8237.99
Price / Sales11.09209.107,034.3011.74
Price / Cash40.0622.1127.3582.29
Price / Book4.9812.109.664.65
Net IncomeC$174.87MC$6.39MC$156.62MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance2.76%0.91%1.52%1.44%
1 Month Performance2.17%1.11%2.21%2.37%
1 Year Performance48.01%80.17%73.12%53.27%

Alamos Gold Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
AGI
Alamos Gold
2.9326 of 5 stars
C$54.72
-0.1%
C$76.20
+39.3%
+46.0%C$22.99BC$2.07B21.802,400
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals
2.1031 of 5 stars
C$180.15
-2.3%
C$205.63
+14.1%
+43.3%C$81.81BC$2.75B45.5340
FNV
Franco-Nevada
1.3315 of 5 stars
C$316.51
-2.0%
C$355.44
+12.3%
+33.7%C$61.04BC$2.11B44.5840
PAAS
Pan American Silver
2.0651 of 5 stars
C$76.44
-1.2%
C$81.75
+6.9%
+113.2%C$32.21BC$4B24.1113,000
IAG
iA Financial
1.7633 of 5 stars
C$174.03
-1.0%
C$177.78
+2.2%
+23.7%C$15.54BC$8.43B16.115,360

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:AGI) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners