Go Pro

Pan American Silver (PAAS) Competitors

Pan American Silver logo
C$63.95 -0.79 (-1.22%)
As of 10/1/2026 04:18 PM Eastern

PAAS vs. ABX, WPM, FNV, K, and LUG

Should you buy Pan American Silver stock or one of its competitors? Pan American Silver's main competitors and comparable companies include Barrick Gold (ABX), Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM), Franco-Nevada (FNV), Kinross Gold (K), and Lundin Gold (LUG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Pan American Silver compare to Barrick Gold?

Barrick Gold (TSE:ABX) and Pan American Silver (TSE:PAAS) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Pan American Silver has a net margin of 32.06% compared to Barrick Gold's net margin of 31.60%. Barrick Gold's return on equity of 24.57% beat Pan American Silver's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Barrick Gold31.60% 24.57% 4.00%
Pan American Silver 32.06%19.61%0.43%

Barrick Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Pan American Silver pays an annual dividend of C$0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Barrick Gold pays out 23.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pan American Silver pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Barrick Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Pan American Silver. Barrick Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pan American Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Barrick GoldC$20.66B4.54C$1.12BC$3.8714.72
Pan American SilverC$4.31B6.15-C$33.47MC$3.3818.92

Barrick Gold has a beta of 1.683477, suggesting that its stock price is 68% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan American Silver has a beta of 2.101154, suggesting that its stock price is 110% more volatile than the broader market.

52.1% of Barrick Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.1% of Pan American Silver shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Barrick Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Pan American Silver shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Barrick Gold currently has a consensus target price of C$67.67, indicating a potential upside of 18.76%. Pan American Silver has a consensus target price of C$84.40, indicating a potential upside of 31.98%. Given Pan American Silver's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Pan American Silver is more favorable than Barrick Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Barrick Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Pan American Silver
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Barrick Gold had 4 more articles in the media than Pan American Silver. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Barrick Gold and 0 mentions for Pan American Silver. Barrick Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Pan American Silver's score of 0.00 indicating that Barrick Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Barrick Gold Neutral
Pan American Silver Neutral

Summary

Barrick Gold beats Pan American Silver on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pan American Silver compare to Wheaton Precious Metals?

Wheaton Precious Metals (TSE:WPM) and Pan American Silver (TSE:PAAS) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

Wheaton Precious Metals currently has a consensus target price of C$203.86, indicating a potential upside of 7.59%. Pan American Silver has a consensus target price of C$84.40, indicating a potential upside of 31.98%. Given Pan American Silver's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Pan American Silver is more favorable than Wheaton Precious Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Wheaton Precious Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.17
Pan American Silver
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Wheaton Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of C$0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Pan American Silver pays an annual dividend of C$0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Wheaton Precious Metals pays out 16.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pan American Silver pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Wheaton Precious Metals has a beta of 1.605335, indicating that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan American Silver has a beta of 2.101154, indicating that its share price is 110% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Wheaton Precious Metals had 15 more articles in the media than Pan American Silver. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Wheaton Precious Metals and 0 mentions for Pan American Silver. Wheaton Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Pan American Silver's score of 0.00 indicating that Wheaton Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wheaton Precious Metals Positive
Pan American Silver Neutral

Wheaton Precious Metals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pan American Silver. Pan American Silver is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wheaton Precious Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wheaton Precious MetalsC$3.17B27.13C$426.03MC$4.5142.03
Pan American SilverC$4.31B6.15-C$33.47MC$3.3818.92

Wheaton Precious Metals has a net margin of 64.66% compared to Pan American Silver's net margin of 32.06%. Wheaton Precious Metals' return on equity of 22.96% beat Pan American Silver's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wheaton Precious Metals64.66% 22.96% 5.35%
Pan American Silver 32.06%19.61%0.43%

63.4% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.1% of Pan American Silver shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Pan American Silver shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Wheaton Precious Metals beats Pan American Silver on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pan American Silver compare to Franco-Nevada?

Franco-Nevada (TSE:FNV) and Pan American Silver (TSE:PAAS) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

In the previous week, Franco-Nevada's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pan American Silver'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Franco-Nevada Neutral
Pan American Silver Neutral

Pan American Silver has higher revenue and earnings than Franco-Nevada. Pan American Silver is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Franco-NevadaC$2.32B27.94-C$442.97MC$7.6543.87
Pan American SilverC$4.31B6.15-C$33.47MC$3.3818.92

Franco-Nevada has a net margin of 63.83% compared to Pan American Silver's net margin of 32.06%. Pan American Silver's return on equity of 19.61% beat Franco-Nevada's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Franco-Nevada63.83% 18.95% -4.57%
Pan American Silver 32.06%19.61%0.43%

Franco-Nevada has a beta of 1.100692, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan American Silver has a beta of 2.101154, indicating that its share price is 110% more volatile than the broader market.

Franco-Nevada presently has a consensus price target of C$356.56, indicating a potential upside of 6.23%. Pan American Silver has a consensus price target of C$84.40, indicating a potential upside of 31.98%. Given Pan American Silver's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Pan American Silver is more favorable than Franco-Nevada.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Franco-Nevada
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.60
Pan American Silver
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

63.2% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.1% of Pan American Silver shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Pan American Silver shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of C$1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Pan American Silver pays an annual dividend of C$0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Franco-Nevada pays out 21.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pan American Silver pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Pan American Silver is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Franco-Nevada and Pan American Silver tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pan American Silver compare to Kinross Gold?

Pan American Silver (TSE:PAAS) and Kinross Gold (TSE:K) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and profitability.

42.1% of Pan American Silver shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.5% of Kinross Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Pan American Silver shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Kinross Gold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pan American Silver pays an annual dividend of C$0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Pan American Silver pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kinross Gold pays out 5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Kinross Gold had 9 more articles in the media than Pan American Silver. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Kinross Gold and 0 mentions for Pan American Silver. Pan American Silver's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Kinross Gold's score of -0.24 indicating that Pan American Silver is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pan American Silver Neutral
Kinross Gold Neutral

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Pan American Silver. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pan American Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pan American SilverC$4.31B6.15-C$33.47MC$3.3818.92
Kinross GoldC$8.47B4.82C$522.52MC$2.6313.01

Pan American Silver presently has a consensus target price of C$84.40, suggesting a potential upside of 31.98%. Kinross Gold has a consensus target price of C$49.42, suggesting a potential upside of 44.41%. Given Kinross Gold's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than Pan American Silver.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pan American Silver
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Kinross Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Kinross Gold has a net margin of 37.56% compared to Pan American Silver's net margin of 32.06%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 35.91% beat Pan American Silver's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pan American Silver32.06% 19.61% 0.43%
Kinross Gold 37.56%35.91%5.16%

Pan American Silver has a beta of 2.101154, meaning that its share price is 110% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kinross Gold has a beta of 1.683744, meaning that its share price is 68% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Kinross Gold beats Pan American Silver on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pan American Silver compare to Lundin Gold?

Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) and Pan American Silver (TSE:PAAS) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

Lundin Gold pays an annual dividend of C$3.95 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Pan American Silver pays an annual dividend of C$0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Lundin Gold pays out 102.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pan American Silver pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Lundin Gold has a net margin of 46.31% compared to Pan American Silver's net margin of 32.06%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 81.63% beat Pan American Silver's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lundin Gold46.31% 81.63% 17.59%
Pan American Silver 32.06%19.61%0.43%

24.2% of Lundin Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.1% of Pan American Silver shares are held by institutional investors. 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Pan American Silver shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Lundin Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pan American Silver. Pan American Silver is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lundin GoldC$2.02B10.38C$215.94MC$3.8522.52
Pan American SilverC$4.31B6.15-C$33.47MC$3.3818.92

Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.643383, suggesting that its share price is 64% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan American Silver has a beta of 2.101154, suggesting that its share price is 110% more volatile than the broader market.

Lundin Gold presently has a consensus price target of C$99.33, suggesting a potential upside of 14.58%. Pan American Silver has a consensus price target of C$84.40, suggesting a potential upside of 31.98%. Given Pan American Silver's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Pan American Silver is more favorable than Lundin Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lundin Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Pan American Silver
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Lundin Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pan American Silver'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lundin Gold Neutral
Pan American Silver Neutral

Summary

Lundin Gold beats Pan American Silver on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pan American Silver News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PAAS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PAAS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PAAS vs. The Competition

MetricPan American SilverMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$26.51BC$3.72BC$4.71BC$12.43B
Dividend Yield1.56%5.24%4.75%6.31%
P/E Ratio18.9224.8325.1039.29
Price / Sales6.1528,026.8216,699.859.05
Price / Cash25.3627.1424.9982.29
Price / Book3.6512.2710.184.58
Net Income-C$33.47MC$127.43MC$158.44MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-5.94%-3.14%-2.74%-1.58%
1 Month Performance-10.35%-4.49%-4.39%-2.57%
1 Year Performance16.87%20.72%17.75%16.40%

Pan American Silver Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PAAS
Pan American Silver
2.224 of 5 stars
C$63.95
-1.2%
C$84.40
+32.0%
+16.8%C$26.51BC$4.31B18.929,348
ABX
Barrick Gold
3.9002 of 5 stars
C$58.47
+0.5%
C$67.67
+15.7%
+21.2%C$96.23BC$20.66B15.1127,000
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals
1.5401 of 5 stars
C$191.82
-0.1%
C$203.86
+6.3%
+21.9%C$87.12BC$3.17B42.5544
FNV
Franco-Nevada
0.9164 of 5 stars
C$352.11
+1.0%
C$356.56
+1.3%
+8.3%C$67.91BC$2.32B46.0338
K
Kinross Gold
3.3849 of 5 stars
C$34.46
+1.0%
C$47.64
+38.3%
-3.5%C$41.15BC$8.47B13.107,100

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:PAAS) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners