Franco-Nevada Competitors

Newmont (TSE:NGT) and Franco-Nevada (TSE:FNV) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Newmont and Franco-Nevada's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Newmont has higher revenue and earnings than Franco-Nevada. Newmont is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Newmont and Franco-Nevada's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Newmont and Franco-Nevada, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Newmont presently has a consensus price target of C$116.00, indicating a potential upside of 65.38%. Franco-Nevada has a consensus price target of C$185.00, indicating a potential upside of 35.75%. Given Newmont's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Newmont is more favorable than Franco-Nevada.

Dividends

Newmont pays an annual dividend of C$1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of C$0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Newmont pays out 29.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Franco-Nevada pays out 54.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Newmont is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Newmont beats Franco-Nevada on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Agnico Eagle Mines (TSE:AEM) and Franco-Nevada (TSE:FNV) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Agnico Eagle Mines and Franco-Nevada's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Franco-Nevada. Agnico Eagle Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Agnico Eagle Mines and Franco-Nevada's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Agnico Eagle Mines and Franco-Nevada, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Agnico Eagle Mines presently has a consensus price target of C$114.14, indicating a potential upside of 61.26%. Franco-Nevada has a consensus price target of C$185.00, indicating a potential upside of 35.75%. Given Agnico Eagle Mines' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Agnico Eagle Mines is more favorable than Franco-Nevada.

Dividends

Agnico Eagle Mines pays an annual dividend of C$0.95 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of C$0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Agnico Eagle Mines pays out 45.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Franco-Nevada pays out 54.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Agnico Eagle Mines is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Agnico Eagle Mines beats Franco-Nevada on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Goldcorp (TSE:G) and Franco-Nevada (TSE:FNV) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Dividends

Goldcorp pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share. Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of C$0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Goldcorp pays out -1.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Franco-Nevada pays out 54.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Profitability

This table compares Goldcorp and Franco-Nevada's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Goldcorp and Franco-Nevada, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Franco-Nevada has a consensus price target of C$185.00, indicating a potential upside of 35.75%.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Goldcorp and Franco-Nevada's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Franco-Nevada has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Goldcorp. Goldcorp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Franco-Nevada beats Goldcorp on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Franco-Nevada (TSE:FNV) and Kirkland Lake Gold (TSE:KL) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Dividends

Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of C$0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Kirkland Lake Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Franco-Nevada pays out 54.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kirkland Lake Gold pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Kirkland Lake Gold is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares Franco-Nevada and Kirkland Lake Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Franco-Nevada and Kirkland Lake Gold, as reported by MarketBeat.

Franco-Nevada currently has a consensus target price of C$185.00, indicating a potential upside of 35.75%. Kirkland Lake Gold has a consensus target price of C$76.83, indicating a potential upside of 84.96%. Given Kirkland Lake Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Kirkland Lake Gold is more favorable than Franco-Nevada.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Franco-Nevada and Kirkland Lake Gold's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Kirkland Lake Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Franco-Nevada. Kirkland Lake Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Kirkland Lake Gold beats Franco-Nevada on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Franco-Nevada (TSE:FNV) and Kinross Gold (TSE:K) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Dividends

Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of C$0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Franco-Nevada pays out 54.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kinross Gold pays out 5.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Kinross Gold is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares Franco-Nevada and Kinross Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Franco-Nevada and Kinross Gold, as reported by MarketBeat.

Franco-Nevada currently has a consensus target price of C$185.00, indicating a potential upside of 35.75%. Kinross Gold has a consensus target price of C$16.08, indicating a potential upside of 100.29%. Given Kinross Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than Franco-Nevada.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Franco-Nevada and Kinross Gold's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Franco-Nevada. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Kinross Gold beats Franco-Nevada on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Franco-Nevada (TSE:FNV) and Canadian Utilities (TSE:CU) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Dividends

Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of C$0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Canadian Utilities pays an annual dividend of C$1.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Franco-Nevada pays out 54.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Canadian Utilities pays out 131.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Profitability

This table compares Franco-Nevada and Canadian Utilities' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Franco-Nevada and Canadian Utilities, as reported by MarketBeat.

Franco-Nevada currently has a consensus target price of C$185.00, indicating a potential upside of 35.75%. Canadian Utilities has a consensus target price of C$35.75, indicating a potential upside of 17.99%. Given Franco-Nevada's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Franco-Nevada is more favorable than Canadian Utilities.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Franco-Nevada and Canadian Utilities' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Canadian Utilities has higher revenue and earnings than Franco-Nevada. Canadian Utilities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.