Do analysts prefer VRN or BIR?

Birchcliff Energy has a consensus price target of C$8.30, indicating a potential upside of 20.64%. Given Birchcliff Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Veren. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Veren 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Birchcliff Energy 0 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, VRN or BIR?

Veren has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Veren is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Birchcliff Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Veren C$3.83B 0.00 C$1.07B C$1.76 N/A Birchcliff Energy C$748.10M 2.52 C$15.45M C$0.35 19.66

Which has better valuation & earnings, BIR or ATH?

Athabasca Oil has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Birchcliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Athabasca Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Birchcliff Energy C$748.10M 2.52 C$15.45M C$0.35 19.66 Athabasca Oil C$1.50B 3.73 C$221.88M C$0.49 23.78

Does the media refer more to BIR or ATH?

In the previous week, Athabasca Oil had 1 more articles in the media than Birchcliff Energy. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Athabasca Oil and 4 mentions for Birchcliff Energy. Birchcliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Athabasca Oil's score of 0.56 indicating that Birchcliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Birchcliff Energy 0 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Athabasca Oil 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate BIR or ERF?

Birchcliff Energy currently has a consensus price target of C$8.30, indicating a potential upside of 20.64%. Given Birchcliff Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Enerplus. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Birchcliff Energy 0 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Enerplus 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, BIR or ERF?

Enerplus has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Enerplus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Birchcliff Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Birchcliff Energy C$748.10M 2.52 C$15.45M C$0.35 19.66 Enerplus C$1.48B 0.00 C$384.73M C$2.44 N/A

Does the media favor BIR or TVE?

In the previous week, Birchcliff Energy and Birchcliff Energy both had 4 articles in the media. Tamarack Valley Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Birchcliff Energy's score of 0.95 indicating that Tamarack Valley Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Birchcliff Energy 0 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Tamarack Valley Energy 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor PEY or BIR?

In the previous week, Peyto Exploration & Development had 7 more articles in the media than Birchcliff Energy. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Peyto Exploration & Development and 4 mentions for Birchcliff Energy. Birchcliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Peyto Exploration & Development's score of 0.89 indicating that Birchcliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Peyto Exploration & Development 3 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Birchcliff Energy 0 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Birchcliff Energy (BIR) Competitors

C$6.88 +0.02 (+0.29%)

As of 11/13/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Compare

BIR vs. VRN, ATH, ERF, TVE, and PEY

Should you buy Birchcliff Energy stock or one of its competitors? Birchcliff Energy's main competitors and comparable companies include Veren (VRN), Athabasca Oil (ATH), Enerplus (ERF), Tamarack Valley Energy (TVE), and Peyto Exploration & Development (PEY). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas exploration & production" industry.

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Veren?

Veren (TSE:VRN) and Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR) are both energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and dividends.

Birchcliff Energy has a net margin of 13.31% compared to Veren's net margin of 6.19%. Birchcliff Energy's return on equity of 4.22% beat Veren's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Veren	6.19%	4.01%	N/A
Birchcliff Energy	13.31%	4.22%	1.82%

Veren has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Veren is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Birchcliff Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Veren	C$3.83B	0.00	C$1.07B	C$1.76	N/A
Birchcliff Energy	C$748.10M	2.52	C$15.45M	C$0.35	19.66

In the previous week, Birchcliff Energy had 4 more articles in the media than Veren. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Birchcliff Energy and 0 mentions for Veren. Birchcliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Veren's score of 0.00 indicating that Birchcliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Veren	Neutral
Birchcliff Energy	Positive

30.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Birchcliff Energy has a consensus price target of C$8.30, indicating a potential upside of 20.64%. Given Birchcliff Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Veren.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Veren	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Birchcliff Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

Birchcliff Energy beats Veren on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Athabasca Oil?

Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR) and Athabasca Oil (TSE:ATH) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Athabasca Oil has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Birchcliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Athabasca Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Birchcliff Energy	C$748.10M	2.52	C$15.45M	C$0.35	19.66
Athabasca Oil	C$1.50B	3.73	C$221.88M	C$0.49	23.78

Birchcliff Energy has a beta of -0.562716, indicating that its share price is 156% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Athabasca Oil has a beta of 0.018392, indicating that its share price is 98% less volatile than the broader market.

Athabasca Oil has a net margin of 17.03% compared to Birchcliff Energy's net margin of 13.31%. Athabasca Oil's return on equity of 12.76% beat Birchcliff Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Birchcliff Energy	13.31%	4.22%	1.82%
Athabasca Oil	17.03%	12.76%	9.71%

Birchcliff Energy presently has a consensus price target of C$8.30, suggesting a potential upside of 20.64%. Athabasca Oil has a consensus price target of C$11.22, suggesting a potential downside of 3.67%. Given Birchcliff Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Athabasca Oil.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Birchcliff Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Athabasca Oil	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.86

In the previous week, Athabasca Oil had 1 more articles in the media than Birchcliff Energy. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Athabasca Oil and 4 mentions for Birchcliff Energy. Birchcliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Athabasca Oil's score of 0.56 indicating that Birchcliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Birchcliff Energy	0 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Athabasca Oil	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

30.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.8% of Athabasca Oil shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Athabasca Oil shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Athabasca Oil beats Birchcliff Energy on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Enerplus?

Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR) and Enerplus (TSE:ERF) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, earnings and institutional ownership.

Birchcliff Energy currently has a consensus price target of C$8.30, indicating a potential upside of 20.64%. Given Birchcliff Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Enerplus.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Birchcliff Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Enerplus	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Birchcliff Energy had 4 more articles in the media than Enerplus. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Birchcliff Energy and 0 mentions for Enerplus. Birchcliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Enerplus' score of 0.00 indicating that Birchcliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Birchcliff Energy	Positive
Enerplus	Neutral

Enerplus has a net margin of 26.04% compared to Birchcliff Energy's net margin of 13.31%. Enerplus' return on equity of 32.27% beat Birchcliff Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Birchcliff Energy	13.31%	4.22%	1.82%
Enerplus	26.04%	32.27%	15.25%

Birchcliff Energy has a beta of -0.562716, indicating that its stock price is 156% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enerplus has a beta of 2.64, indicating that its stock price is 164% more volatile than the broader market.

Enerplus has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Enerplus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Birchcliff Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Birchcliff Energy	C$748.10M	2.52	C$15.45M	C$0.35	19.66
Enerplus	C$1.48B	0.00	C$384.73M	C$2.44	N/A

Birchcliff Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Enerplus pays an annual dividend of C$0.36 per share. Birchcliff Energy pays out 34.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enerplus pays out 14.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

30.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.9% of Enerplus shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Enerplus shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Enerplus beats Birchcliff Energy on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Tamarack Valley Energy?

Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR) and Tamarack Valley Energy (TSE:TVE) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

30.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.9% of Tamarack Valley Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Tamarack Valley Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Birchcliff Energy has a beta of -0.562716, meaning that its stock price is 156% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tamarack Valley Energy has a beta of 0.528405, meaning that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Birchcliff Energy and Birchcliff Energy both had 4 articles in the media. Tamarack Valley Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Birchcliff Energy's score of 0.95 indicating that Tamarack Valley Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Birchcliff Energy	0 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Tamarack Valley Energy	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Birchcliff Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Tamarack Valley Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Birchcliff Energy pays out 34.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Tamarack Valley Energy pays out 22.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Birchcliff Energy presently has a consensus target price of C$8.30, indicating a potential upside of 20.64%. Tamarack Valley Energy has a consensus target price of C$15.08, indicating a potential upside of 27.18%. Given Tamarack Valley Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Tamarack Valley Energy is more favorable than Birchcliff Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Birchcliff Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Tamarack Valley Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Tamarack Valley Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Tamarack Valley Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Birchcliff Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Birchcliff Energy	C$748.10M	2.52	C$15.45M	C$0.35	19.66
Tamarack Valley Energy	C$1.91B	2.91	C$208.06M	C$0.76	15.61

Tamarack Valley Energy has a net margin of 22.34% compared to Birchcliff Energy's net margin of 13.31%. Tamarack Valley Energy's return on equity of 20.30% beat Birchcliff Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Birchcliff Energy	13.31%	4.22%	1.82%
Tamarack Valley Energy	22.34%	20.30%	6.55%

Summary

Tamarack Valley Energy beats Birchcliff Energy on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Peyto Exploration & Development?

Peyto Exploration & Development (TSE:PEY) and Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

28.6% of Peyto Exploration & Development shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Peyto Exploration & Development shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Peyto Exploration & Development had 7 more articles in the media than Birchcliff Energy. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Peyto Exploration & Development and 4 mentions for Birchcliff Energy. Birchcliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Peyto Exploration & Development's score of 0.89 indicating that Birchcliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Peyto Exploration & Development	3 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Birchcliff Energy	0 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Peyto Exploration & Development currently has a consensus target price of C$28.00, suggesting a potential upside of 9.37%. Birchcliff Energy has a consensus target price of C$8.30, suggesting a potential upside of 20.64%. Given Birchcliff Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Peyto Exploration & Development.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Peyto Exploration & Development	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71
Birchcliff Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Peyto Exploration & Development has a net margin of 42.77% compared to Birchcliff Energy's net margin of 13.31%. Peyto Exploration & Development's return on equity of 18.66% beat Birchcliff Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Peyto Exploration & Development	42.77%	18.66%	6.40%
Birchcliff Energy	13.31%	4.22%	1.82%

Peyto Exploration & Development has a beta of -0.098926, indicating that its stock price is 110% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Birchcliff Energy has a beta of -0.562716, indicating that its stock price is 156% less volatile than the broader market.

Peyto Exploration & Development has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Peyto Exploration & Development is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Birchcliff Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Peyto Exploration & Development	C$1.35B	3.92	C$293.72M	C$2.68	9.55
Birchcliff Energy	C$748.10M	2.52	C$15.45M	C$0.35	19.66

Peyto Exploration & Development pays an annual dividend of C$1.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Birchcliff Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Peyto Exploration & Development pays out 51.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Birchcliff Energy pays out 34.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Peyto Exploration & Development beats Birchcliff Energy on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Birchcliff Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BIR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

BIR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Birchcliff Energy	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry	Energy Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$1.89B	C$11.24B	C$9.76B	C$12.96B
Dividend Yield	1.82%	6.36%	6.20%	4.73%
P/E Ratio	19.66	21.50	21.24	30.30
Price / Sales	2.52	5.05	4.39	3.88
Price / Cash	N/A	21.07	20.31	34.92
Price / Book	0.82	2.77	2.69	3.48
Net Income	C$15.45M	C$5.28B	C$4.34B	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	4.72%	0.87%	1.24%	-0.39%
1 Month Performance	3.77%	-6.22%	-5.58%	-1.49%
1 Year Performance	-1.15%	20.53%	21.60%	14.04%

Birchcliff Energy Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
BIR Birchcliff Energy	4.1488 of 5 stars	C$6.88 +0.3%	C$8.30 +20.6%	N/A	C$1.89B	C$748.10M	19.66	224	News Coverage Earnings Report
VRN Veren	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$5.60B	C$3.83B	5.20	777
ATH Athabasca Oil	1.9728 of 5 stars	C$11.49 -0.1%	C$11.22 -2.3%	N/A	C$5.52B	C$1.50B	23.45	187
ERF Enerplus	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$5.47B	C$1.48B	10.98	404
TVE Tamarack Valley Energy	4.8913 of 5 stars	C$11.29 +1.0%	C$15.08 +33.6%	N/A	C$5.30B	C$1.91B	14.86	106	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:BIR) was last updated on 11/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Birchcliff Energy (BIR) Competitors

BIR vs. VRN, ATH, ERF, TVE, and PEY

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Veren?

Summary

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Athabasca Oil?

Summary

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Enerplus?

Summary

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Tamarack Valley Energy?

Summary

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Peyto Exploration & Development?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BIR vs. The Competition

Birchcliff Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Birchcliff Energy (BIR) Competitors

BIR vs. VRN, ATH, ERF, TVE, and PEY

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Veren?

Is VRN or BIR more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, VRN or BIR?

Does the media refer more to VRN or BIR?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in VRN or BIR?

Do analysts prefer VRN or BIR?

Summary

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Athabasca Oil?

Which has better valuation & earnings, BIR or ATH?

Which has more risk & volatility, BIR or ATH?

Is BIR or ATH more profitable?

Do analysts prefer BIR or ATH?

Does the media refer more to BIR or ATH?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of BIR or ATH?

Summary

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Enerplus?

Do analysts rate BIR or ERF?

Does the media refer more to BIR or ERF?

Is BIR or ERF more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, BIR or ERF?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, BIR or ERF?

Is BIR or ERF a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in BIR or ERF?

Summary

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Tamarack Valley Energy?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of BIR or TVE?

Which has more volatility and risk, BIR or TVE?

Does the media favor BIR or TVE?

Is BIR or TVE a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate BIR or TVE?

Which has better earnings & valuation, BIR or TVE?

Is BIR or TVE more profitable?

Summary

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Peyto Exploration & Development?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in PEY or BIR?

Does the media favor PEY or BIR?

Do analysts prefer PEY or BIR?

Is PEY or BIR more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, PEY or BIR?

Which has better valuation & earnings, PEY or BIR?

Is PEY or BIR a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BIR vs. The Competition

Birchcliff Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools