Does the media prefer BIR or TVE?

In the previous week, Tamarack Valley Energy had 8 more articles in the media than Birchcliff Energy. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Tamarack Valley Energy and 1 mentions for Birchcliff Energy. Birchcliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Tamarack Valley Energy's score of 1.09 indicating that Birchcliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Birchcliff Energy 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Tamarack Valley Energy 2 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate VRN or BIR?

Birchcliff Energy has a consensus target price of C$8.67, indicating a potential upside of 35.63%. Given Birchcliff Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Veren. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Veren 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Birchcliff Energy 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.40

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, VRN or BIR?

Veren has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Veren is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Birchcliff Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Veren C$3.83B 0.00 C$1.07B C$1.76 N/A Birchcliff Energy C$748.10M 2.34 C$15.45M C$0.35 18.26

Do analysts prefer ERF or BIR?

Birchcliff Energy has a consensus target price of C$8.67, indicating a potential upside of 35.63%. Given Birchcliff Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Enerplus. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Enerplus 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Birchcliff Energy 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.40

Which has higher valuation & earnings, ERF or BIR?

Enerplus has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Enerplus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Birchcliff Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Enerplus C$1.48B 0.00 C$384.73M C$2.44 N/A Birchcliff Energy C$748.10M 2.34 C$15.45M C$0.35 18.26

Which has higher valuation & earnings, ATH or BIR?

Athabasca Oil has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Birchcliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Athabasca Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Athabasca Oil C$1.37B 3.87 C$221.88M C$0.47 23.49 Birchcliff Energy C$748.10M 2.34 C$15.45M C$0.35 18.26

Does the media prefer ATH or BIR?

In the previous week, Athabasca Oil and Athabasca Oil both had 1 articles in the media. Birchcliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Athabasca Oil's score of 0.94 indicating that Birchcliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Athabasca Oil 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Birchcliff Energy 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to PEY or BIR?

In the previous week, Peyto Exploration & Development had 1 more articles in the media than Birchcliff Energy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Peyto Exploration & Development and 1 mentions for Birchcliff Energy. Birchcliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Peyto Exploration & Development's score of 0.59 indicating that Birchcliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Peyto Exploration & Development 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Birchcliff Energy 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Birchcliff Energy (BIR) Competitors

C$6.39 +0.04 (+0.63%)

As of 01:22 PM Eastern

Compare

BIR vs. TVE, VRN, ERF, ATH, and PEY

Should you buy Birchcliff Energy stock or one of its competitors? Birchcliff Energy's main competitors and comparable companies include Tamarack Valley Energy (TVE), Veren (VRN), Enerplus (ERF), Athabasca Oil (ATH), and Peyto Exploration & Development (PEY). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas exploration & production" industry.

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Tamarack Valley Energy?

Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR) and Tamarack Valley Energy (TSE:TVE) are both energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

26.2% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.9% of Tamarack Valley Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Tamarack Valley Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Birchcliff Energy currently has a consensus target price of C$8.67, suggesting a potential upside of 35.63%. Tamarack Valley Energy has a consensus target price of C$13.93, suggesting a potential upside of 2.44%. Given Birchcliff Energy's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Tamarack Valley Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Birchcliff Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
Tamarack Valley Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Birchcliff Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Tamarack Valley Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Birchcliff Energy pays out 34.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Tamarack Valley Energy pays out 225.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Birchcliff Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Tamarack Valley Energy had 8 more articles in the media than Birchcliff Energy. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Tamarack Valley Energy and 1 mentions for Birchcliff Energy. Birchcliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Tamarack Valley Energy's score of 1.09 indicating that Birchcliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Birchcliff Energy	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Tamarack Valley Energy	2 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Birchcliff Energy has a net margin of 13.31% compared to Tamarack Valley Energy's net margin of 1.50%. Birchcliff Energy's return on equity of 4.22% beat Tamarack Valley Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Birchcliff Energy	13.31%	4.22%	1.82%
Tamarack Valley Energy	1.50%	1.34%	6.55%

Birchcliff Energy has a beta of -0.516083, indicating that its stock price is 152% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tamarack Valley Energy has a beta of 0.262524, indicating that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

Tamarack Valley Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Birchcliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tamarack Valley Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Birchcliff Energy	C$748.10M	2.34	C$15.45M	C$0.35	18.26
Tamarack Valley Energy	C$1.85B	3.50	C$208.06M	C$0.07	194.29

Summary

Tamarack Valley Energy beats Birchcliff Energy on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Veren?

Veren (TSE:VRN) and Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Birchcliff Energy has a net margin of 13.31% compared to Veren's net margin of 6.19%. Birchcliff Energy's return on equity of 4.22% beat Veren's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Veren	6.19%	4.01%	N/A
Birchcliff Energy	13.31%	4.22%	1.82%

26.2% of Birchcliff Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Veren has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Veren is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Birchcliff Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Veren	C$3.83B	0.00	C$1.07B	C$1.76	N/A
Birchcliff Energy	C$748.10M	2.34	C$15.45M	C$0.35	18.26

Birchcliff Energy has a consensus target price of C$8.67, indicating a potential upside of 35.63%. Given Birchcliff Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Veren.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Veren	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Birchcliff Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

In the previous week, Birchcliff Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Veren. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Birchcliff Energy and 0 mentions for Veren. Birchcliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Veren's score of 0.00 indicating that Birchcliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Veren	Neutral
Birchcliff Energy	Positive

Summary

Birchcliff Energy beats Veren on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Enerplus?

Enerplus (TSE:ERF) and Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

Enerplus has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Enerplus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Birchcliff Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Enerplus	C$1.48B	0.00	C$384.73M	C$2.44	N/A
Birchcliff Energy	C$748.10M	2.34	C$15.45M	C$0.35	18.26

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Enerplus	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Birchcliff Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

In the previous week, Birchcliff Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Enerplus. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Birchcliff Energy and 0 mentions for Enerplus. Birchcliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Enerplus' score of 0.00 indicating that Birchcliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Enerplus	Neutral
Birchcliff Energy	Positive

Enerplus has a beta of 2.64, indicating that its share price is 164% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Birchcliff Energy has a beta of -0.516083, indicating that its share price is 152% less volatile than the broader market.

Enerplus has a net margin of 26.04% compared to Birchcliff Energy's net margin of 13.31%. Enerplus' return on equity of 32.27% beat Birchcliff Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Enerplus	26.04%	32.27%	15.25%
Birchcliff Energy	13.31%	4.22%	1.82%

67.9% of Enerplus shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.2% of Birchcliff Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Enerplus shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Enerplus pays an annual dividend of C$0.36 per share. Birchcliff Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Enerplus pays out 14.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Birchcliff Energy pays out 34.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Enerplus beats Birchcliff Energy on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Athabasca Oil?

Athabasca Oil (TSE:ATH) and Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

36.9% of Athabasca Oil shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.2% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Athabasca Oil shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Athabasca Oil has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Birchcliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Athabasca Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Athabasca Oil	C$1.37B	3.87	C$221.88M	C$0.47	23.49
Birchcliff Energy	C$748.10M	2.34	C$15.45M	C$0.35	18.26

In the previous week, Athabasca Oil and Athabasca Oil both had 1 articles in the media. Birchcliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Athabasca Oil's score of 0.94 indicating that Birchcliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Athabasca Oil	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Birchcliff Energy	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Athabasca Oil has a beta of -0.17194, indicating that its share price is 117% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Birchcliff Energy has a beta of -0.516083, indicating that its share price is 152% less volatile than the broader market.

Athabasca Oil presently has a consensus target price of C$11.50, indicating a potential upside of 4.17%. Birchcliff Energy has a consensus target price of C$8.67, indicating a potential upside of 35.63%. Given Birchcliff Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Athabasca Oil.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Athabasca Oil	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.43
Birchcliff Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

Athabasca Oil has a net margin of 17.68% compared to Birchcliff Energy's net margin of 13.31%. Athabasca Oil's return on equity of 12.57% beat Birchcliff Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Athabasca Oil	17.68%	12.57%	9.71%
Birchcliff Energy	13.31%	4.22%	1.82%

Summary

Athabasca Oil beats Birchcliff Energy on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Peyto Exploration & Development?

Peyto Exploration & Development (TSE:PEY) and Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Peyto Exploration & Development has a net margin of 39.78% compared to Birchcliff Energy's net margin of 13.31%. Peyto Exploration & Development's return on equity of 16.96% beat Birchcliff Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Peyto Exploration & Development	39.78%	16.96%	6.40%
Birchcliff Energy	13.31%	4.22%	1.82%

28.6% of Peyto Exploration & Development shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.2% of Birchcliff Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Peyto Exploration & Development shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Peyto Exploration & Development has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Peyto Exploration & Development is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Birchcliff Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Peyto Exploration & Development	C$1.26B	4.05	C$293.72M	C$2.39	10.41
Birchcliff Energy	C$748.10M	2.34	C$15.45M	C$0.35	18.26

Peyto Exploration & Development has a beta of -0.480347, meaning that its share price is 148% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Birchcliff Energy has a beta of -0.516083, meaning that its share price is 152% less volatile than the broader market.

Peyto Exploration & Development pays an annual dividend of C$1.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Birchcliff Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Peyto Exploration & Development pays out 56.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Birchcliff Energy pays out 34.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Peyto Exploration & Development had 1 more articles in the media than Birchcliff Energy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Peyto Exploration & Development and 1 mentions for Birchcliff Energy. Birchcliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Peyto Exploration & Development's score of 0.59 indicating that Birchcliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Peyto Exploration & Development	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Birchcliff Energy	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Peyto Exploration & Development currently has a consensus target price of C$26.64, indicating a potential upside of 7.09%. Birchcliff Energy has a consensus target price of C$8.67, indicating a potential upside of 35.63%. Given Birchcliff Energy's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Peyto Exploration & Development.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Peyto Exploration & Development	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Birchcliff Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

Summary

Peyto Exploration & Development beats Birchcliff Energy on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Birchcliff Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BIR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

BIR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Birchcliff Energy	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry	Energy Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$1.75B	C$11.65B	C$10.17B	C$12.54B
Dividend Yield	1.85%	11.21%	11.47%	6.25%
P/E Ratio	18.26	18.93	22.00	40.37
Price / Sales	2.34	617.23	504.75	9.81
Price / Cash	N/A	39.95	36.31	82.29
Price / Book	0.76	4.57	4.13	4.68
Net Income	C$15.45M	C$5.27B	C$4.33B	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-1.84%	1.24%	1.01%	-1.15%
1 Month Performance	0.79%	6.86%	5.74%	-0.51%
1 Year Performance	3.90%	38.58%	39.41%	24.55%

Birchcliff Energy Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
BIR Birchcliff Energy	4.2438 of 5 stars	C$6.39 +0.6%	C$8.67 +35.6%	+3.4%	C$1.75B	C$748.10M	18.26	218	News Coverage Positive News Dividend Announcement
TVE Tamarack Valley Energy	2.4153 of 5 stars	C$13.78 +3.1%	C$13.70 -0.5%	+148.8%	C$6.55B	C$1.85B	196.86	N/A	News Coverage Positive News Dividend Increase Analyst Forecast
VRN Veren	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$5.60B	C$3.83B	5.20	777
ERF Enerplus	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$5.47B	C$1.48B	10.98	404
ATH Athabasca Oil	2.1308 of 5 stars	C$10.97 +1.0%	C$11.50 +4.8%	+78.5%	C$5.28B	C$1.37B	23.34	170	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:BIR) was last updated on 9/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Birchcliff Energy (BIR) Competitors

BIR vs. TVE, VRN, ERF, ATH, and PEY

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Tamarack Valley Energy?

Summary

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Veren?

Summary

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Enerplus?

Summary

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Athabasca Oil?

Summary

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Peyto Exploration & Development?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BIR vs. The Competition

Birchcliff Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Birchcliff Energy (BIR) Competitors

BIR vs. TVE, VRN, ERF, ATH, and PEY

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Tamarack Valley Energy?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in BIR or TVE?

Do analysts recommend BIR or TVE?

Is BIR or TVE a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer BIR or TVE?

Is BIR or TVE more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, BIR or TVE?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, BIR or TVE?

Summary

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Veren?

Is VRN or BIR more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in VRN or BIR?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, VRN or BIR?

Do analysts rate VRN or BIR?

Does the media refer more to VRN or BIR?

Summary

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Enerplus?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, ERF or BIR?

Do analysts prefer ERF or BIR?

Does the media favor ERF or BIR?

Which has more risk & volatility, ERF or BIR?

Is ERF or BIR more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in ERF or BIR?

Is ERF or BIR a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Athabasca Oil?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in ATH or BIR?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, ATH or BIR?

Does the media prefer ATH or BIR?

Which has more risk and volatility, ATH or BIR?

Do analysts recommend ATH or BIR?

Is ATH or BIR more profitable?

Summary

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Peyto Exploration & Development?

Is PEY or BIR more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in PEY or BIR?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, PEY or BIR?

Which has more volatility & risk, PEY or BIR?

Is PEY or BIR a better dividend stock?

Does the media refer more to PEY or BIR?

Do analysts rate PEY or BIR?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BIR vs. The Competition

Birchcliff Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools