Free Trial

Birchcliff Energy (BIR) Competitors

Birchcliff Energy logo
C$6.54 -0.31 (-4.53%)
As of 05/25/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

BIR vs. CPG, ATH, PEY, ERF, and BTE

Should you buy Birchcliff Energy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Birchcliff Energy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Birchcliff Energy include Crescent Point Energy (CPG), Athabasca Oil (ATH), Peyto Exploration & Development (PEY), Enerplus (ERF), and Baytex Energy (BTE). These companies are all part of the "oil & gas e&p" industry.

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Crescent Point Energy?

Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR) and Crescent Point Energy (TSE:CPG) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Crescent Point Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Crescent Point Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Birchcliff Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Birchcliff EnergyC$740.14M2.42C$15.45MC$0.2526.16
Crescent Point EnergyC$3.51B0.00C$215.70MC$0.49N/A

23.3% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.5% of Crescent Point Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Crescent Point Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Birchcliff Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Crescent Point Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Birchcliff Energy and 0 mentions for Crescent Point Energy. Birchcliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Crescent Point Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Birchcliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Birchcliff Energy Positive
Crescent Point Energy Neutral

Birchcliff Energy has a net margin of 9.59% compared to Crescent Point Energy's net margin of -1.65%. Crescent Point Energy's return on equity of 3.31% beat Birchcliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Birchcliff Energy9.59% 3.07% 1.82%
Crescent Point Energy -1.65%3.31%2.86%

Birchcliff Energy presently has a consensus target price of C$8.57, indicating a potential upside of 31.06%. Given Birchcliff Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Crescent Point Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Birchcliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Crescent Point Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Birchcliff Energy has a beta of -0.300638, suggesting that its stock price is 130% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crescent Point Energy has a beta of 2.84, suggesting that its stock price is 184% more volatile than the broader market.

Birchcliff Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Crescent Point Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.46 per share. Birchcliff Energy pays out 48.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crescent Point Energy pays out 93.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Birchcliff Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Birchcliff Energy beats Crescent Point Energy on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Athabasca Oil?

Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR) and Athabasca Oil (TSE:ATH) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

In the previous week, Birchcliff Energy and Birchcliff Energy both had 1 articles in the media. Birchcliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Athabasca Oil's score of 0.50 indicating that Birchcliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Birchcliff Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Athabasca Oil
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Birchcliff Energy has a beta of -0.300638, meaning that its share price is 130% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Athabasca Oil has a beta of 0.123957, meaning that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

Athabasca Oil has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Athabasca Oil is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Birchcliff Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Birchcliff EnergyC$740.14M2.42C$15.45MC$0.2526.16
Athabasca OilC$1.39B3.95C$221.88MC$0.4525.20

Birchcliff Energy presently has a consensus price target of C$8.57, indicating a potential upside of 31.06%. Athabasca Oil has a consensus price target of C$10.38, indicating a potential downside of 8.51%. Given Birchcliff Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Athabasca Oil.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Birchcliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Athabasca Oil
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Athabasca Oil has a net margin of 16.25% compared to Birchcliff Energy's net margin of 9.59%. Athabasca Oil's return on equity of 12.23% beat Birchcliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Birchcliff Energy9.59% 3.07% 1.82%
Athabasca Oil 16.25%12.23%9.71%

23.3% of Birchcliff Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.0% of Athabasca Oil shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Athabasca Oil shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Athabasca Oil beats Birchcliff Energy on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Peyto Exploration & Development?

Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR) and Peyto Exploration & Development (TSE:PEY) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Birchcliff Energy has a beta of -0.300638, suggesting that its share price is 130% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peyto Exploration & Development has a beta of -0.202928, suggesting that its share price is 120% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Peyto Exploration & Development had 2 more articles in the media than Birchcliff Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Peyto Exploration & Development and 1 mentions for Birchcliff Energy. Birchcliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Peyto Exploration & Development's score of 0.00 indicating that Birchcliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Birchcliff Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Peyto Exploration & Development
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Birchcliff Energy currently has a consensus target price of C$8.57, suggesting a potential upside of 31.06%. Peyto Exploration & Development has a consensus target price of C$26.08, suggesting a potential upside of 1.29%. Given Birchcliff Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Peyto Exploration & Development.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Birchcliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Peyto Exploration & Development
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

Birchcliff Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Peyto Exploration & Development pays an annual dividend of C$1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. Birchcliff Energy pays out 48.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peyto Exploration & Development pays out 57.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Peyto Exploration & Development has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Peyto Exploration & Development is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Birchcliff Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Birchcliff EnergyC$740.14M2.42C$15.45MC$0.2526.16
Peyto Exploration & DevelopmentC$1.21B4.37C$293.72MC$2.3111.15

Peyto Exploration & Development has a net margin of 40.47% compared to Birchcliff Energy's net margin of 9.59%. Peyto Exploration & Development's return on equity of 16.78% beat Birchcliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Birchcliff Energy9.59% 3.07% 1.82%
Peyto Exploration & Development 40.47%16.78%6.40%

23.3% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.3% of Peyto Exploration & Development shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Peyto Exploration & Development shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Peyto Exploration & Development beats Birchcliff Energy on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Enerplus?

Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR) and Enerplus (TSE:ERF) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Birchcliff Energy has a beta of -0.300638, suggesting that its stock price is 130% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enerplus has a beta of 2.64, suggesting that its stock price is 164% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Birchcliff Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Enerplus. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Birchcliff Energy and 0 mentions for Enerplus. Birchcliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Enerplus' score of 0.00 indicating that Birchcliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Birchcliff Energy Positive
Enerplus Neutral

23.3% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.9% of Enerplus shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Enerplus shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Enerplus has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Enerplus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Birchcliff Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Birchcliff EnergyC$740.14M2.42C$15.45MC$0.2526.16
EnerplusC$1.48B0.00C$384.73MC$2.44N/A

Birchcliff Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Enerplus pays an annual dividend of C$0.36 per share. Birchcliff Energy pays out 48.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enerplus pays out 14.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Enerplus has a net margin of 26.04% compared to Birchcliff Energy's net margin of 9.59%. Enerplus' return on equity of 32.27% beat Birchcliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Birchcliff Energy9.59% 3.07% 1.82%
Enerplus 26.04%32.27%15.25%

Birchcliff Energy presently has a consensus price target of C$8.57, suggesting a potential upside of 31.06%. Given Birchcliff Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Enerplus.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Birchcliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Enerplus
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Birchcliff Energy and Enerplus tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Baytex Energy?

Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR) and Baytex Energy (TSE:BTE) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Birchcliff Energy has a beta of -0.300638, suggesting that its stock price is 130% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baytex Energy has a beta of 0.576663, suggesting that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Birchcliff Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Baytex Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Birchcliff Energy pays out 48.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Baytex Energy pays out -7.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Birchcliff Energy and Birchcliff Energy both had 1 articles in the media. Baytex Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat Birchcliff Energy's score of 0.63 indicating that Baytex Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Birchcliff Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Baytex Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

23.3% of Birchcliff Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.2% of Baytex Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Baytex Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Birchcliff Energy currently has a consensus price target of C$8.57, suggesting a potential upside of 31.06%. Baytex Energy has a consensus price target of C$7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 3.70%. Given Birchcliff Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Baytex Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Birchcliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Baytex Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.45

Birchcliff Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Baytex Energy. Baytex Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Birchcliff Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Birchcliff EnergyC$740.14M2.42C$15.45MC$0.2526.16
Baytex EnergyC$1.68B2.90-C$347.90M-C$0.96N/A

Birchcliff Energy has a net margin of 9.59% compared to Baytex Energy's net margin of -83.88%. Birchcliff Energy's return on equity of 3.07% beat Baytex Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Birchcliff Energy9.59% 3.07% 1.82%
Baytex Energy -83.88%-23.15%-0.08%

Summary

Birchcliff Energy beats Baytex Energy on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Birchcliff Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BIR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BIR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BIR vs. The Competition

MetricBirchcliff EnergyOil & Gas E&P IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$1.79BC$2.09BC$10.58BC$12.16B
Dividend Yield1.75%7.52%10.23%6.20%
P/E Ratio26.1631.8721.1037.64
Price / Sales2.423,396.32999.6111.68
Price / CashN/A85.5438.7482.29
Price / Book0.783.664.664.50
Net IncomeC$15.45MC$82.07MC$4.24BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-5.35%-2.14%-0.52%2.48%
1 Month Performance11.41%1.31%2.21%1.47%
1 Year Performance-2.24%56.43%53.92%53.55%

Birchcliff Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BIR
Birchcliff Energy
4.173 of 5 stars
C$6.54
-4.5%
C$8.57
+31.1%
-0.8%C$1.79BC$740.14M26.16218
CPG
Crescent Point Energy
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$7.24BC$3.51B23.92777
ATH
Athabasca Oil
1.3915 of 5 stars
C$12.57
+1.3%
C$10.38
-17.5%
+117.2%C$6.08BC$1.39B27.93170
PEY
Peyto Exploration & Development
1.7885 of 5 stars
C$27.12
+1.2%
C$24.55
-9.5%
+36.9%C$5.56BC$1.21B11.7453
ERF
Enerplus
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$5.47BC$1.48B10.98404

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:BIR) was last updated on 5/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners