Go Pro

Birchcliff Energy (BIR) Competitors

Birchcliff Energy logo
C$6.40 +0.06 (+0.95%)
As of 08/20/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

BIR vs. TVE, VRN, ERF, PEY, and ATH

Should you buy Birchcliff Energy stock or one of its competitors? Birchcliff Energy's main competitors and comparable companies include Tamarack Valley Energy (TVE), Veren (VRN), Enerplus (ERF), Peyto Exploration & Development (PEY), and Athabasca Oil (ATH). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas exploration & production" industry.

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Tamarack Valley Energy?

Tamarack Valley Energy (TSE:TVE) and Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

In the previous week, Tamarack Valley Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Birchcliff Energy. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Tamarack Valley Energy and 2 mentions for Birchcliff Energy. Tamarack Valley Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Birchcliff Energy's score of 0.51 indicating that Tamarack Valley Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Tamarack Valley Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Birchcliff Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

35.5% of Tamarack Valley Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.4% of Birchcliff Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Tamarack Valley Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Birchcliff Energy has a net margin of 13.31% compared to Tamarack Valley Energy's net margin of 1.50%. Birchcliff Energy's return on equity of 4.22% beat Tamarack Valley Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tamarack Valley Energy1.50% 1.34% 6.55%
Birchcliff Energy 13.31%4.22%1.82%

Tamarack Valley Energy presently has a consensus price target of C$13.70, indicating a potential downside of 0.40%. Birchcliff Energy has a consensus price target of C$8.67, indicating a potential upside of 35.42%. Given Birchcliff Energy's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Tamarack Valley Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tamarack Valley Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Birchcliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Tamarack Valley Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Birchcliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tamarack Valley Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tamarack Valley EnergyC$1.85B3.54C$208.06MC$0.07196.57
Birchcliff EnergyC$748.10M2.35C$15.45MC$0.3518.29

Tamarack Valley Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Birchcliff Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Tamarack Valley Energy pays out 225.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Birchcliff Energy pays out 34.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Birchcliff Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Tamarack Valley Energy has a beta of 0.315643, indicating that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Birchcliff Energy has a beta of -0.566462, indicating that its stock price is 157% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Tamarack Valley Energy beats Birchcliff Energy on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Veren?

Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR) and Veren (TSE:VRN) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends and risk.

Birchcliff Energy has a net margin of 13.31% compared to Veren's net margin of 6.19%. Birchcliff Energy's return on equity of 4.22% beat Veren's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Birchcliff Energy13.31% 4.22% 1.82%
Veren 6.19%4.01%N/A

In the previous week, Birchcliff Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Veren. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Birchcliff Energy and 0 mentions for Veren. Birchcliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Veren's score of 0.00 indicating that Birchcliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Birchcliff Energy Positive
Veren Neutral

Veren has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Veren is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Birchcliff Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Birchcliff EnergyC$748.10M2.35C$15.45MC$0.3518.29
VerenC$3.83B0.00C$1.07BC$1.76N/A

26.4% of Birchcliff Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Birchcliff Energy currently has a consensus target price of C$8.67, indicating a potential upside of 35.42%. Given Birchcliff Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Veren.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Birchcliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Veren
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Birchcliff Energy beats Veren on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Enerplus?

Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR) and Enerplus (TSE:ERF) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

26.4% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.9% of Enerplus shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Enerplus shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Birchcliff Energy presently has a consensus price target of C$8.67, suggesting a potential upside of 35.42%. Given Birchcliff Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Enerplus.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Birchcliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Enerplus
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Enerplus has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Enerplus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Birchcliff Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Birchcliff EnergyC$748.10M2.35C$15.45MC$0.3518.29
EnerplusC$1.48B0.00C$384.73MC$2.44N/A

Birchcliff Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Enerplus pays an annual dividend of C$0.36 per share. Birchcliff Energy pays out 34.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enerplus pays out 14.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Enerplus has a net margin of 26.04% compared to Birchcliff Energy's net margin of 13.31%. Enerplus' return on equity of 32.27% beat Birchcliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Birchcliff Energy13.31% 4.22% 1.82%
Enerplus 26.04%32.27%15.25%

In the previous week, Birchcliff Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Enerplus. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Birchcliff Energy and 0 mentions for Enerplus. Birchcliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Enerplus' score of 0.00 indicating that Birchcliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Birchcliff Energy Positive
Enerplus Neutral

Birchcliff Energy has a beta of -0.566462, indicating that its share price is 157% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enerplus has a beta of 2.64, indicating that its share price is 164% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Enerplus beats Birchcliff Energy on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Peyto Exploration & Development?

Peyto Exploration & Development (TSE:PEY) and Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability and media sentiment.

Peyto Exploration & Development pays an annual dividend of C$1.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Birchcliff Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Peyto Exploration & Development pays out 56.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Birchcliff Energy pays out 34.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Peyto Exploration & Development has a beta of -0.506352, meaning that its share price is 151% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Birchcliff Energy has a beta of -0.566462, meaning that its share price is 157% less volatile than the broader market.

Peyto Exploration & Development has a net margin of 40.80% compared to Birchcliff Energy's net margin of 13.31%. Peyto Exploration & Development's return on equity of 16.96% beat Birchcliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Peyto Exploration & Development40.80% 16.96% 6.40%
Birchcliff Energy 13.31%4.22%1.82%

In the previous week, Birchcliff Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Peyto Exploration & Development. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Birchcliff Energy and 0 mentions for Peyto Exploration & Development. Birchcliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Peyto Exploration & Development's score of 0.00 indicating that Birchcliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Peyto Exploration & Development Neutral
Birchcliff Energy Positive

Peyto Exploration & Development has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Peyto Exploration & Development is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Birchcliff Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Peyto Exploration & DevelopmentC$1.26B4.12C$293.72MC$2.3910.59
Birchcliff EnergyC$748.10M2.35C$15.45MC$0.3518.29

Peyto Exploration & Development presently has a consensus price target of C$26.64, indicating a potential upside of 5.22%. Birchcliff Energy has a consensus price target of C$8.67, indicating a potential upside of 35.42%. Given Birchcliff Energy's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Peyto Exploration & Development.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Peyto Exploration & Development
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Birchcliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

29.3% of Peyto Exploration & Development shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.4% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of Peyto Exploration & Development shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Peyto Exploration & Development beats Birchcliff Energy on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Athabasca Oil?

Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR) and Athabasca Oil (TSE:ATH) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

Athabasca Oil has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Birchcliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Athabasca Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Birchcliff EnergyC$748.10M2.35C$15.45MC$0.3518.29
Athabasca OilC$1.37B3.87C$221.88MC$0.4723.47

Birchcliff Energy has a beta of -0.566462, indicating that its stock price is 157% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Athabasca Oil has a beta of -0.232689, indicating that its stock price is 123% less volatile than the broader market.

Birchcliff Energy presently has a consensus target price of C$8.67, indicating a potential upside of 35.42%. Athabasca Oil has a consensus target price of C$11.50, indicating a potential upside of 4.26%. Given Birchcliff Energy's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Athabasca Oil.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Birchcliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Athabasca Oil
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Athabasca Oil has a net margin of 17.68% compared to Birchcliff Energy's net margin of 13.31%. Athabasca Oil's return on equity of 12.57% beat Birchcliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Birchcliff Energy13.31% 4.22% 1.82%
Athabasca Oil 17.68%12.57%9.71%

In the previous week, Birchcliff Energy and Birchcliff Energy both had 2 articles in the media. Athabasca Oil's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Birchcliff Energy's score of 0.51 indicating that Athabasca Oil is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Birchcliff Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Athabasca Oil
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

26.4% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.0% of Athabasca Oil shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Athabasca Oil shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Athabasca Oil beats Birchcliff Energy on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Birchcliff Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BIR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BIR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BIR vs. The Competition

MetricBirchcliff EnergyOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$1.74BC$11.43BC$9.98BC$12.61B
Dividend Yield1.89%11.45%11.67%6.21%
P/E Ratio18.2916.9620.4138.57
Price / Sales2.35494.77405.8410.05
Price / CashN/A39.8336.2082.29
Price / Book0.763.203.014.78
Net IncomeC$15.45MC$5.27BC$4.32BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance0.16%2.28%1.52%0.09%
1 Month Performance-0.93%5.34%4.76%4.06%
1 Year Performance3.06%39.12%40.90%35.91%

Birchcliff Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BIR
Birchcliff Energy
4.0977 of 5 stars
C$6.40
+0.9%
C$8.67
+35.4%
+5.4%C$1.74BC$748.10M18.29218
TVE
Tamarack Valley Energy
2.278 of 5 stars
C$13.20
+0.3%
C$13.38
+1.3%
+164.1%C$6.27BC$1.85B188.57N/A
VRN
Veren
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$5.60BC$3.83B5.20777
ERF
Enerplus
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$5.47BC$1.48B10.98404
PEY
Peyto Exploration & Development
1.9144 of 5 stars
C$25.25
+0.8%
C$26.64
+5.5%
+35.6%C$5.17BC$1.21B10.9353

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:BIR) was last updated on 8/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners