Go Pro

Birchcliff Energy (BIR) Competitors

Birchcliff Energy logo
C$6.32 -0.18 (-2.77%)
As of 07/27/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

BIR vs. ERF, ATH, PEY, BTE, and POU

Should you buy Birchcliff Energy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Birchcliff Energy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Birchcliff Energy include Enerplus (ERF), Athabasca Oil (ATH), Peyto Exploration & Development (PEY), Baytex Energy (BTE), and Paramount Resources (POU). These companies are all part of the "oil & gas e&p" industry.

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Enerplus?

Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR) and Enerplus (TSE:ERF) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and earnings.

Enerplus has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Enerplus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Birchcliff Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Birchcliff EnergyC$740.14M2.34C$15.45MC$0.2525.28
EnerplusC$1.48B0.00C$384.73MC$2.44N/A

Birchcliff Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Enerplus pays an annual dividend of C$0.36 per share. Birchcliff Energy pays out 48.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enerplus pays out 14.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Birchcliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Enerplus'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Birchcliff Energy Neutral
Enerplus Neutral

25.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.9% of Enerplus shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Enerplus shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Enerplus has a net margin of 26.04% compared to Birchcliff Energy's net margin of 9.59%. Enerplus' return on equity of 32.27% beat Birchcliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Birchcliff Energy9.59% 3.07% 1.82%
Enerplus 26.04%32.27%15.25%

Birchcliff Energy presently has a consensus target price of C$8.67, suggesting a potential upside of 37.13%. Given Birchcliff Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Enerplus.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Birchcliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Enerplus
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Birchcliff Energy has a beta of -0.566125, indicating that its share price is 157% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enerplus has a beta of 2.64, indicating that its share price is 164% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Enerplus beats Birchcliff Energy on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Athabasca Oil?

Athabasca Oil (TSE:ATH) and Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Athabasca Oil has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Athabasca Oil is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Birchcliff Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Athabasca OilC$1.39B3.70C$221.88MC$0.4523.64
Birchcliff EnergyC$740.14M2.34C$15.45MC$0.2525.28

37.5% of Athabasca Oil shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Athabasca Oil shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Athabasca Oil currently has a consensus price target of C$11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 8.08%. Birchcliff Energy has a consensus price target of C$8.67, suggesting a potential upside of 37.13%. Given Birchcliff Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Athabasca Oil.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Athabasca Oil
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Birchcliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

In the previous week, Athabasca Oil had 3 more articles in the media than Birchcliff Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Athabasca Oil and 0 mentions for Birchcliff Energy. Athabasca Oil's average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat Birchcliff Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Athabasca Oil is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Athabasca Oil Neutral
Birchcliff Energy Neutral

Athabasca Oil has a beta of -0.194923, meaning that its share price is 119% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Birchcliff Energy has a beta of -0.566125, meaning that its share price is 157% less volatile than the broader market.

Athabasca Oil has a net margin of 16.25% compared to Birchcliff Energy's net margin of 9.59%. Athabasca Oil's return on equity of 12.23% beat Birchcliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Athabasca Oil16.25% 12.23% 9.71%
Birchcliff Energy 9.59%3.07%1.82%

Summary

Athabasca Oil beats Birchcliff Energy on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Peyto Exploration & Development?

Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR) and Peyto Exploration & Development (TSE:PEY) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

Peyto Exploration & Development has a net margin of 40.47% compared to Birchcliff Energy's net margin of 9.59%. Peyto Exploration & Development's return on equity of 16.78% beat Birchcliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Birchcliff Energy9.59% 3.07% 1.82%
Peyto Exploration & Development 40.47%16.78%6.40%

Birchcliff Energy has a beta of -0.566125, indicating that its stock price is 157% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peyto Exploration & Development has a beta of -0.504508, indicating that its stock price is 150% less volatile than the broader market.

Birchcliff Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Peyto Exploration & Development pays an annual dividend of C$1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. Birchcliff Energy pays out 48.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peyto Exploration & Development pays out 57.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

25.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.5% of Peyto Exploration & Development shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Peyto Exploration & Development shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Peyto Exploration & Development has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Peyto Exploration & Development is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Birchcliff Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Birchcliff EnergyC$740.14M2.34C$15.45MC$0.2525.28
Peyto Exploration & DevelopmentC$1.21B4.36C$293.72MC$2.3111.11

Birchcliff Energy currently has a consensus target price of C$8.67, indicating a potential upside of 37.13%. Peyto Exploration & Development has a consensus target price of C$26.64, indicating a potential upside of 3.79%. Given Birchcliff Energy's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Peyto Exploration & Development.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Birchcliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Peyto Exploration & Development
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

In the previous week, Peyto Exploration & Development had 2 more articles in the media than Birchcliff Energy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Peyto Exploration & Development and 0 mentions for Birchcliff Energy. Peyto Exploration & Development's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Birchcliff Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Peyto Exploration & Development is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Birchcliff Energy Neutral
Peyto Exploration & Development Positive

Summary

Peyto Exploration & Development beats Birchcliff Energy on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Baytex Energy?

Baytex Energy (TSE:BTE) and Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and institutional ownership.

27.6% of Baytex Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Baytex Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Baytex Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Birchcliff Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Baytex Energy and 0 mentions for Birchcliff Energy. Baytex Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Birchcliff Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Baytex Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baytex Energy Positive
Birchcliff Energy Neutral

Baytex Energy presently has a consensus target price of C$7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.45%. Birchcliff Energy has a consensus target price of C$8.67, suggesting a potential upside of 37.13%. Given Birchcliff Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Baytex Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Baytex Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.45
Birchcliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Baytex Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Birchcliff Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Baytex Energy pays out -7.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Birchcliff Energy pays out 48.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Baytex Energy has a beta of 0.41014, suggesting that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Birchcliff Energy has a beta of -0.566125, suggesting that its stock price is 157% less volatile than the broader market.

Birchcliff Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Baytex Energy. Baytex Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Birchcliff Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baytex EnergyC$1.68B2.48-C$347.90M-C$0.96N/A
Birchcliff EnergyC$740.14M2.34C$15.45MC$0.2525.28

Birchcliff Energy has a net margin of 9.59% compared to Baytex Energy's net margin of -83.88%. Birchcliff Energy's return on equity of 3.07% beat Baytex Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baytex Energy-83.88% -23.15% -0.08%
Birchcliff Energy 9.59%3.07%1.82%

Summary

Birchcliff Energy beats Baytex Energy on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Birchcliff Energy compare to Paramount Resources?

Paramount Resources (TSE:POU) and Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

Paramount Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Birchcliff Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Paramount Resources pays out 150.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Birchcliff Energy pays out 48.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Paramount Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Birchcliff Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Paramount Resources and 0 mentions for Birchcliff Energy. Paramount Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Birchcliff Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Paramount Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Paramount Resources Positive
Birchcliff Energy Neutral

Paramount Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Birchcliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Paramount Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Paramount ResourcesC$933.40M4.62C$366.00MC$0.4073.93
Birchcliff EnergyC$740.14M2.34C$15.45MC$0.2525.28

Paramount Resources currently has a consensus price target of C$32.94, suggesting a potential upside of 11.41%. Birchcliff Energy has a consensus price target of C$8.67, suggesting a potential upside of 37.13%. Given Birchcliff Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Paramount Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Paramount Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Birchcliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

9.1% of Paramount Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 45.4% of Paramount Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Birchcliff Energy has a net margin of 9.59% compared to Paramount Resources' net margin of 5.90%. Birchcliff Energy's return on equity of 3.07% beat Paramount Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Paramount Resources5.90% 1.96% 5.97%
Birchcliff Energy 9.59%3.07%1.82%

Paramount Resources has a beta of -0.236574, suggesting that its stock price is 124% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Birchcliff Energy has a beta of -0.566125, suggesting that its stock price is 157% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Paramount Resources beats Birchcliff Energy on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Birchcliff Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BIR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BIR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BIR vs. The Competition

MetricBirchcliff EnergyOil & Gas E&P IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$1.78BC$2.01BC$10.35BC$12.43B
Dividend Yield1.85%7.58%11.40%6.19%
P/E Ratio25.2830.4219.2236.67
Price / Sales2.341,191.70378.999.56
Price / CashN/A85.5336.6182.29
Price / Book0.752.314.094.41
Net IncomeC$15.45MC$82.07MC$4.25BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-2.17%0.70%-0.98%-0.22%
1 Month Performance0.48%3.70%1.64%0.51%
1 Year Performance-8.01%34.35%26.35%30.91%

Birchcliff Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BIR
Birchcliff Energy
3.5172 of 5 stars
C$6.32
-2.8%
C$8.67
+37.1%
-7.1%C$1.78BC$740.14M25.28218
ERF
Enerplus
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$5.47BC$1.48B10.98404
ATH
Athabasca Oil
2.5599 of 5 stars
C$10.73
-0.2%
C$11.50
+7.2%
+83.4%C$5.19BC$1.39B23.84170
PEY
Peyto Exploration & Development
2.7936 of 5 stars
C$24.76
+1.9%
C$26.64
+7.6%
+32.7%C$5.07BC$1.21B10.7253
BTE
Baytex Energy
3.591 of 5 stars
C$5.95
+0.7%
C$7.00
+17.6%
+106.3%C$4.24BC$1.68BN/A220

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:BIR) was last updated on 7/28/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners