Free Trial
Your Portfolio Deserves Better! MarketBeat All Access for Just $149
Upgrade Now
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Whitecap Resources (WCP) Competitors

Whitecap Resources logo
C$17.07 +0.22 (+1.31%)
As of 12:34 PM Eastern

WCP vs. TOU, OVV, ARX, SCR, and PSK

Should you buy Whitecap Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Whitecap Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Whitecap Resources include Tourmaline Oil (TOU), Ovintiv (OVV), ARC Resources (ARX), Strathcona Resources (SCR), and PrairieSky Royalty (PSK). These companies are all part of the "oil & gas e&p" industry.

How does Whitecap Resources compare to Tourmaline Oil?

Tourmaline Oil (TSE:TOU) and Whitecap Resources (TSE:WCP) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Tourmaline Oil has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Whitecap Resources. Whitecap Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tourmaline Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tourmaline OilC$6.27B4.22C$1.65BC$1.8137.62
Whitecap ResourcesC$6.98B2.98C$860.11MC$0.7323.44

50.0% of Tourmaline Oil shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.6% of Whitecap Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.1% of Tourmaline Oil shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Whitecap Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Whitecap Resources has a net margin of 13.32% compared to Tourmaline Oil's net margin of 12.79%. Whitecap Resources' return on equity of 7.70% beat Tourmaline Oil's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tourmaline Oil12.79% 4.40% 6.26%
Whitecap Resources 13.32%7.70%6.86%

Tourmaline Oil currently has a consensus price target of C$71.00, indicating a potential upside of 4.27%. Whitecap Resources has a consensus price target of C$16.73, indicating a potential downside of 2.24%. Given Tourmaline Oil's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Tourmaline Oil is more favorable than Whitecap Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tourmaline Oil
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91
Whitecap Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.23

Tourmaline Oil pays an annual dividend of C$2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Whitecap Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.73 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Tourmaline Oil pays out 110.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Whitecap Resources pays out 99.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Whitecap Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Tourmaline Oil has a beta of -0.115445, indicating that its share price is 112% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Whitecap Resources has a beta of 0.383329, indicating that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Tourmaline Oil and Tourmaline Oil both had 4 articles in the media. Tourmaline Oil's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Whitecap Resources' score of 0.15 indicating that Tourmaline Oil is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Tourmaline Oil
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Whitecap Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Whitecap Resources beats Tourmaline Oil on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Whitecap Resources compare to Ovintiv?

Ovintiv (TSE:OVV) and Whitecap Resources (TSE:WCP) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

Ovintiv has higher revenue and earnings than Whitecap Resources. Whitecap Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ovintiv, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
OvintivC$9.06B2.54C$1.39BC$3.0426.99
Whitecap ResourcesC$6.98B2.98C$860.11MC$0.7323.44

Ovintiv pays an annual dividend of C$1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Whitecap Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.73 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Ovintiv pays out 39.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Whitecap Resources pays out 99.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

62.4% of Ovintiv shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.6% of Whitecap Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ovintiv shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Whitecap Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Whitecap Resources has a net margin of 13.32% compared to Ovintiv's net margin of 8.59%. Whitecap Resources' return on equity of 7.70% beat Ovintiv's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ovintiv8.59% 7.13% 8.59%
Whitecap Resources 13.32%7.70%6.86%

In the previous week, Ovintiv and Ovintiv both had 4 articles in the media. Ovintiv's average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Whitecap Resources' score of 0.15 indicating that Ovintiv is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ovintiv
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Whitecap Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Ovintiv has a beta of 0.581365, suggesting that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Whitecap Resources has a beta of 0.383329, suggesting that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

Ovintiv currently has a consensus price target of C$70.00, indicating a potential downside of 14.68%. Whitecap Resources has a consensus price target of C$16.73, indicating a potential downside of 2.24%. Given Whitecap Resources' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Whitecap Resources is more favorable than Ovintiv.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ovintiv
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
6 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.30
Whitecap Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.23

Summary

Ovintiv beats Whitecap Resources on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Whitecap Resources compare to ARC Resources?

Whitecap Resources (TSE:WCP) and ARC Resources (TSE:ARX) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

Whitecap Resources currently has a consensus target price of C$16.73, indicating a potential downside of 2.24%. ARC Resources has a consensus target price of C$29.98, indicating a potential downside of 5.81%. Given Whitecap Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Whitecap Resources is more favorable than ARC Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Whitecap Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.23
ARC Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.31

In the previous week, Whitecap Resources had 3 more articles in the media than ARC Resources. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Whitecap Resources and 1 mentions for ARC Resources. Whitecap Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.15 beat ARC Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Whitecap Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Whitecap Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
ARC Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Whitecap Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.73 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. ARC Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Whitecap Resources pays out 99.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. ARC Resources pays out 31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

ARC Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Whitecap Resources. ARC Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Whitecap Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Whitecap ResourcesC$6.98B2.98C$860.11MC$0.7323.44
ARC ResourcesC$6.93B2.60C$1.11BC$2.5312.58

Whitecap Resources has a beta of 0.383329, meaning that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ARC Resources has a beta of -0.265168, meaning that its stock price is 127% less volatile than the broader market.

ARC Resources has a net margin of 22.18% compared to Whitecap Resources' net margin of 13.32%. ARC Resources' return on equity of 17.43% beat Whitecap Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Whitecap Resources13.32% 7.70% 6.86%
ARC Resources 22.18%17.43%7.88%

30.6% of Whitecap Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 54.4% of ARC Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Whitecap Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of ARC Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Whitecap Resources beats ARC Resources on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Whitecap Resources compare to Strathcona Resources?

Whitecap Resources (TSE:WCP) and Strathcona Resources (TSE:SCR) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability and risk.

Strathcona Resources has a net margin of 20.18% compared to Whitecap Resources' net margin of 13.32%. Strathcona Resources' return on equity of 13.89% beat Whitecap Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Whitecap Resources13.32% 7.70% 6.86%
Strathcona Resources 20.18%13.89%6.81%

In the previous week, Whitecap Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Strathcona Resources. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Whitecap Resources and 2 mentions for Strathcona Resources. Whitecap Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.15 beat Strathcona Resources' score of -0.46 indicating that Whitecap Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Whitecap Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Strathcona Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

30.6% of Whitecap Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.7% of Strathcona Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Whitecap Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 91.3% of Strathcona Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Whitecap Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.73 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Strathcona Resources pays an annual dividend of C$1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Whitecap Resources pays out 99.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Strathcona Resources pays out 34.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Whitecap Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Strathcona Resources. Strathcona Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Whitecap Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Whitecap ResourcesC$6.98B2.98C$860.11MC$0.7323.44
Strathcona ResourcesC$4.14B2.56C$370.36MC$3.4714.24

Whitecap Resources presently has a consensus price target of C$16.73, indicating a potential downside of 2.24%. Strathcona Resources has a consensus price target of C$39.14, indicating a potential downside of 20.76%. Given Whitecap Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Whitecap Resources is more favorable than Strathcona Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Whitecap Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.23
Strathcona Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

Whitecap Resources has a beta of 0.383329, meaning that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Strathcona Resources has a beta of 2.614012, meaning that its stock price is 161% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Whitecap Resources beats Strathcona Resources on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Whitecap Resources compare to PrairieSky Royalty?

Whitecap Resources (TSE:WCP) and PrairieSky Royalty (TSE:PSK) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

Whitecap Resources has higher revenue and earnings than PrairieSky Royalty. Whitecap Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PrairieSky Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Whitecap ResourcesC$6.98B2.98C$860.11MC$0.7323.44
PrairieSky RoyaltyC$483.90M16.88C$214.83MC$0.8640.86

30.6% of Whitecap Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.1% of PrairieSky Royalty shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Whitecap Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of PrairieSky Royalty shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

PrairieSky Royalty has a net margin of 42.81% compared to Whitecap Resources' net margin of 13.32%. PrairieSky Royalty's return on equity of 7.89% beat Whitecap Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Whitecap Resources13.32% 7.70% 6.86%
PrairieSky Royalty 42.81%7.89%5.99%

In the previous week, Whitecap Resources had 3 more articles in the media than PrairieSky Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Whitecap Resources and 1 mentions for PrairieSky Royalty. Whitecap Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.15 beat PrairieSky Royalty's score of 0.00 indicating that Whitecap Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Whitecap Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
PrairieSky Royalty
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Whitecap Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.73 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. PrairieSky Royalty pays an annual dividend of C$1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Whitecap Resources pays out 99.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PrairieSky Royalty pays out 121.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Whitecap Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Whitecap Resources has a beta of 0.383329, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PrairieSky Royalty has a beta of 0.568175, indicating that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Whitecap Resources currently has a consensus price target of C$16.73, indicating a potential downside of 2.24%. PrairieSky Royalty has a consensus price target of C$32.25, indicating a potential downside of 8.22%. Given Whitecap Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Whitecap Resources is more favorable than PrairieSky Royalty.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Whitecap Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.23
PrairieSky Royalty
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

Summary

Whitecap Resources beats PrairieSky Royalty on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Whitecap Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WCP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WCP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

WCP vs. The Competition

MetricWhitecap ResourcesOil & Gas E&P IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$20.77BC$2.19BC$10.69BC$11.94B
Dividend Yield4.25%7.55%10.18%6.23%
P/E Ratio23.4433.7721.5137.39
Price / Sales2.983,568.981,039.1411.41
Price / Cash353.7085.5438.0082.29
Price / Book1.923.514.604.38
Net IncomeC$860.11MC$82.07MC$4.25BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance5.68%0.87%0.83%-1.29%
1 Month Performance18.49%5.23%4.90%0.63%
1 Year Performance100.35%61.48%56.89%53.33%

Whitecap Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
WCP
Whitecap Resources
1.8817 of 5 stars
C$17.07
+1.3%
C$16.73
-2.0%
+98.2%C$20.72BC$6.98B23.38542
TOU
Tourmaline Oil
2.8542 of 5 stars
C$67.50
flat
C$71.00
+5.2%
+3.8%C$26.21BC$6.27B37.29389
OVV
Ovintiv
1.8576 of 5 stars
C$82.56
flat
N/A+59.4%C$23.20BC$9.06B27.161,740
ARX
ARC Resources
1.8712 of 5 stars
C$31.09
flat
C$29.98
-3.6%
+6.3%C$17.74BC$6.93B12.29438
SCR
Strathcona Resources
1.694 of 5 stars
C$48.49
flat
C$39.14
-19.3%
+70.8%C$10.39BC$4.14B13.97193

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:WCP) was last updated on 5/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners