Free Trial
→ Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow! (From Weiss Ratings) (Ad)tc pixel Free CGG Stock Alerts

China Gold International Resources (CGG) Competitors

China Gold International Resources logo
C$31.83 -0.24 (-0.75%)
As of 01:49 PM Eastern
Compare

CGG vs. K, PAAS, LUG, EDV, and EQX

Should you buy China Gold International Resources stock or one of its competitors? China Gold International Resources's main competitors and comparable companies include Kinross Gold (K), Pan American Silver (PAAS), Lundin Gold (LUG), Endeavour Mining (EDV), and Equinox Gold (EQX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Kinross Gold?

Kinross Gold (TSE:K) and China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and earnings.

48.0% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.6% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Kinross Gold had 8 more articles in the media than China Gold International Resources. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Kinross Gold and 1 mentions for China Gold International Resources. Kinross Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat China Gold International Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Kinross Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Kinross Gold
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
China Gold International Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than China Gold International Resources. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kinross GoldC$8.44B4.27C$522.52MC$2.6411.58
China Gold International ResourcesC$1.64B7.73-C$15.76MC$1.9516.42

Kinross Gold has a beta of 2.03586, suggesting that its share price is 104% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Gold International Resources has a beta of 2.267569, suggesting that its share price is 127% more volatile than the broader market.

Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. China Gold International Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Kinross Gold pays out 5.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. China Gold International Resources pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 46.95% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of 37.64%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 34.13% beat China Gold International Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kinross Gold37.64% 34.13% 5.16%
China Gold International Resources 46.95%32.43%-1.06%

Kinross Gold currently has a consensus target price of C$48.17, suggesting a potential upside of 57.56%. Given Kinross Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kinross Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.14
China Gold International Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Kinross Gold beats China Gold International Resources on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Pan American Silver?

China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) and Pan American Silver (TSE:PAAS) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

22.6% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.4% of Pan American Silver shares are held by institutional investors. 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Pan American Silver shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

China Gold International Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Pan American Silver pays an annual dividend of C$0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. China Gold International Resources pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pan American Silver pays out 18.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Pan American Silver had 8 more articles in the media than China Gold International Resources. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Pan American Silver and 1 mentions for China Gold International Resources. Pan American Silver's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat China Gold International Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Pan American Silver is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
China Gold International Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Pan American Silver
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Pan American Silver has a consensus price target of C$84.40, suggesting a potential upside of 49.01%. Given Pan American Silver's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Pan American Silver is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Gold International Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Pan American Silver
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

China Gold International Resources has a beta of 2.267569, meaning that its share price is 127% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan American Silver has a beta of 2.143839, meaning that its share price is 114% more volatile than the broader market.

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 46.95% compared to Pan American Silver's net margin of 35.18%. China Gold International Resources' return on equity of 32.43% beat Pan American Silver's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Gold International Resources46.95% 32.43% -1.06%
Pan American Silver 35.18%21.67%0.43%

China Gold International Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pan American Silver. Pan American Silver is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Gold International ResourcesC$1.64B7.73-C$15.76MC$1.9516.42
Pan American SilverC$4.46B5.23-C$33.47MC$3.8014.91

Summary

Pan American Silver beats China Gold International Resources on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Lundin Gold?

China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) and Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

22.6% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.2% of Lundin Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Lundin Gold had 5 more articles in the media than China Gold International Resources. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Lundin Gold and 1 mentions for China Gold International Resources. Lundin Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.23 beat China Gold International Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Lundin Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
China Gold International Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Lundin Gold
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 46.95% compared to Lundin Gold's net margin of 46.31%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 106.65% beat China Gold International Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Gold International Resources46.95% 32.43% -1.06%
Lundin Gold 46.31%106.65%17.59%

Lundin Gold has higher revenue and earnings than China Gold International Resources. China Gold International Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Gold International ResourcesC$1.64B7.73-C$15.76MC$1.9516.42
Lundin GoldC$2.20B10.84C$215.94MC$4.2123.50

China Gold International Resources has a beta of 2.267569, suggesting that its share price is 127% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.857499, suggesting that its share price is 86% more volatile than the broader market.

China Gold International Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Lundin Gold pays an annual dividend of C$4.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. China Gold International Resources pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lundin Gold pays out 100.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Lundin Gold has a consensus price target of C$108.40, suggesting a potential upside of 9.58%. Given Lundin Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Lundin Gold is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Gold International Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Lundin Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Lundin Gold beats China Gold International Resources on 15 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Endeavour Mining?

Endeavour Mining (TSE:EDV) and China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 46.95% compared to Endeavour Mining's net margin of 17.62%. China Gold International Resources' return on equity of 32.43% beat Endeavour Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Endeavour Mining17.62% 26.17% 3.54%
China Gold International Resources 46.95%32.43%-1.06%

Endeavour Mining pays an annual dividend of C$1.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. China Gold International Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Endeavour Mining pays out 42.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. China Gold International Resources pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

China Gold International Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Endeavour Mining. China Gold International Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Endeavour Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Endeavour MiningC$4.75B4.00-C$239.30MC$3.4023.20
China Gold International ResourcesC$1.64B7.73-C$15.76MC$1.9516.42

Endeavour Mining has a beta of 2.024231, suggesting that its share price is 102% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Gold International Resources has a beta of 2.267569, suggesting that its share price is 127% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Endeavour Mining had 1 more articles in the media than China Gold International Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Endeavour Mining and 1 mentions for China Gold International Resources. Endeavour Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled China Gold International Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Endeavour Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
China Gold International Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

60.4% of Endeavour Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.6% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.1% of Endeavour Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Endeavour Mining presently has a consensus target price of C$93.50, suggesting a potential upside of 18.55%. Given Endeavour Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Endeavour Mining is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Endeavour Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
China Gold International Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Endeavour Mining beats China Gold International Resources on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Equinox Gold?

Equinox Gold (TSE:EQX) and China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Equinox Gold presently has a consensus price target of C$25.14, suggesting a potential upside of 61.59%. Given Equinox Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Equinox Gold is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Equinox Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.17
China Gold International Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

45.9% of Equinox Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.6% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.4% of Equinox Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Equinox Gold has a beta of 3.507721, suggesting that its stock price is 251% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Gold International Resources has a beta of 2.267569, suggesting that its stock price is 127% more volatile than the broader market.

Equinox Gold has higher revenue and earnings than China Gold International Resources. Equinox Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Equinox GoldC$2.90B6.27C$214.45MC$1.0814.41
China Gold International ResourcesC$1.64B7.68-C$15.76MC$1.9516.30

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 46.95% compared to Equinox Gold's net margin of 23.98%. China Gold International Resources' return on equity of 32.43% beat Equinox Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Equinox Gold23.98% 11.50% 0.47%
China Gold International Resources 46.95%32.43%-1.06%

Equinox Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. China Gold International Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Equinox Gold pays out 2.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. China Gold International Resources pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Equinox Gold had 5 more articles in the media than China Gold International Resources. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Equinox Gold and 1 mentions for China Gold International Resources. Equinox Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.15 beat China Gold International Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Equinox Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Equinox Gold
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
China Gold International Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Equinox Gold beats China Gold International Resources on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get China Gold International Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CGG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CGG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CGG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricChina Gold International ResourcesMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$12.62BC$3.64BC$4.71BC$13.14B
Dividend Yield1.51%5.00%4.30%4.74%
P/E Ratio16.3029.1528.9529.46
Price / Sales7.688.645.804.00
Price / Cash4.0322.9620.9734.92
Price / Book4.744.514.163.58
Net Income-C$15.76MC$127.79MC$159.85MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-1.55%0.10%-0.21%0.28%
1 Month Performance-20.25%-7.48%-5.65%-1.47%
1 Year Performance27.47%10.26%9.66%14.35%

China Gold International Resources Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CGG
China Gold International Resources
N/AC$31.83
-0.7%		N/A+30.8%C$12.62BC$1.64B16.302,351
K
Kinross Gold
3.6968 of 5 stars		C$31.36
+3.6%		C$48.17
+53.6%		-14.3%C$36.94BC$8.44B11.887,100
PAAS
Pan American Silver
3.3885 of 5 stars		C$58.19
+2.3%		C$84.40
+45.0%		+8.1%C$24.13BC$4.31B17.229,348
LUG
Lundin Gold
2.1803 of 5 stars		C$98.46
+2.7%		C$108.40
+10.1%		-9.0%C$23.79BC$2.02B25.571,893
EDV
Endeavour Mining
2.3094 of 5 stars		C$79.38
+2.6%		C$93.50
+17.8%		+36.8%C$19.12BC$4.75B23.355,659

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:CGG) was last updated on 11/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Why I'm selling my Snapback Indicator for just $7
For Black Friday, Base Camp Trading's Thomas Wood is offering lifetime access to his proprietary Snapback Indi...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s EO to send this $5 stock ripping higher…?
President Trump's December executive order declared space a national security and economic priority, fueling a...
Traders Agency | Sponsoredtc pixel
The Withdrawal You'll Never See on Your Statement
A proposal circulating in Washington, dubbed the Mar-a-Lago Accord, calls for tariffs and currency pressure to...
Bishop Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Today's free pick (on me)
Elon Musk doesn't own the chip inside every Tesla, Starlink dish, and AI satellite - he licenses it from one l...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal called it the "$64 trillion question": is a stock market crash on the way? Weiss Ratin...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your free book is about to disappear
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book for free - but only for a limited time throug...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
The investigation Porter spent tens of thousands to document
Porter Stansberry flew the Porter and Co. team 3,300 miles to Dublin to investigate a 17-year investing experi...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Uranium Mine Flood That Sparked a 2006 Price Surge Returns
In 2006, a flooded mine at Cigar Lake sent uranium prices from the $50 range to $136 in eight months. This pa...
Digest Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel