Free Trial

China Gold International Resources (CGG) Competitors

China Gold International Resources logo
C$28.41 +0.56 (+2.01%)
As of 05/25/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

CGG vs. PPTA, EDR, SLS, ASM, and SIL

Should you buy China Gold International Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares China Gold International Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with China Gold International Resources include Perpetua Resources (PPTA), Endeavour Silver (EDR), Solaris Resources (SLS), Avino Silver & Gold Mines (ASM), and SilverCrest Metals (SIL). These companies are all part of the "other precious metals & mining" industry.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Perpetua Resources?

China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) and Perpetua Resources (TSE:PPTA) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

24.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.3% of Perpetua Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Perpetua Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

China Gold International Resources has a beta of 2.008914, suggesting that its share price is 101% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Perpetua Resources has a beta of 1.009627, suggesting that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 41.16% compared to Perpetua Resources' net margin of 0.00%. China Gold International Resources' return on equity of 27.74% beat Perpetua Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Gold International Resources41.16% 27.74% -1.06%
Perpetua Resources N/A -20.71%-29.12%

In the previous week, Perpetua Resources had 4 more articles in the media than China Gold International Resources. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Perpetua Resources and 0 mentions for China Gold International Resources. Perpetua Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.12 beat China Gold International Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Perpetua Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
China Gold International Resources Neutral
Perpetua Resources Neutral

Perpetua Resources has a consensus price target of C$55.00, indicating a potential upside of 51.18%. Given Perpetua Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Perpetua Resources is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Gold International Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Perpetua Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

China Gold International Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Perpetua Resources. Perpetua Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Gold International ResourcesC$1.49B7.56-C$15.76MC$1.5518.29
Perpetua ResourcesN/AN/A-C$16.37M-C$1.35N/A

Summary

China Gold International Resources beats Perpetua Resources on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Endeavour Silver?

Endeavour Silver (TSE:EDR) and China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation and dividends.

Endeavour Silver has a beta of 3.239061, meaning that its stock price is 224% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Gold International Resources has a beta of 2.008914, meaning that its stock price is 101% more volatile than the broader market.

40.5% of Endeavour Silver shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Endeavour Silver shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Endeavour Silver pays an annual dividend of C$1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.9%. China Gold International Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Endeavour Silver pays out -2,600.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. China Gold International Resources pays out 3.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Endeavour Silver is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

China Gold International Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Endeavour Silver. Endeavour Silver is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Endeavour SilverC$613.70M6.32-C$20.79M-C$0.06N/A
China Gold International ResourcesC$1.49B7.56-C$15.76MC$1.5518.29

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 41.16% compared to Endeavour Silver's net margin of -3.48%. China Gold International Resources' return on equity of 27.74% beat Endeavour Silver's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Endeavour Silver-3.48% -3.75% 0.10%
China Gold International Resources 41.16%27.74%-1.06%

Endeavour Silver presently has a consensus target price of C$19.23, indicating a potential upside of 46.68%. Given Endeavour Silver's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Endeavour Silver is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Endeavour Silver
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.50
China Gold International Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Endeavour Silver's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled China Gold International Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Endeavour Silver Neutral
China Gold International Resources Neutral

Summary

Endeavour Silver beats China Gold International Resources on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Solaris Resources?

Solaris Resources (TSE:SLS) and China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

China Gold International Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Solaris Resources. Solaris Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Solaris ResourcesN/AN/A-C$46.49M-C$0.19N/A
China Gold International ResourcesC$1.49B7.56-C$15.76MC$1.5518.29

Solaris Resources presently has a consensus price target of C$19.50, suggesting a potential upside of 39.89%. Given Solaris Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Solaris Resources is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Solaris Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
China Gold International Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 41.16% compared to Solaris Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Solaris Resources' return on equity of 60.97% beat China Gold International Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Solaris ResourcesN/A 60.97% -51.67%
China Gold International Resources 41.16%27.74%-1.06%

In the previous week, Solaris Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled China Gold International Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Solaris Resources Neutral
China Gold International Resources Neutral

Solaris Resources has a beta of 1.884686, suggesting that its share price is 88% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Gold International Resources has a beta of 2.008914, suggesting that its share price is 101% more volatile than the broader market.

16.0% of Solaris Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 40.6% of Solaris Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

China Gold International Resources beats Solaris Resources on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Avino Silver & Gold Mines?

China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines (TSE:ASM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 41.16% compared to Avino Silver & Gold Mines' net margin of 33.31%. China Gold International Resources' return on equity of 27.74% beat Avino Silver & Gold Mines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Gold International Resources41.16% 27.74% -1.06%
Avino Silver & Gold Mines 33.31%17.62%2.03%

In the previous week, Avino Silver & Gold Mines had 1 more articles in the media than China Gold International Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Avino Silver & Gold Mines and 0 mentions for China Gold International Resources. China Gold International Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Avino Silver & Gold Mines'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
China Gold International Resources Neutral
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Gold International Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Avino Silver & Gold Mines
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

24.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.6% of Avino Silver & Gold Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Avino Silver & Gold Mines shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Avino Silver & Gold Mines has lower revenue, but higher earnings than China Gold International Resources. China Gold International Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avino Silver & Gold Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Gold International ResourcesC$1.49B7.56-C$15.76MC$1.5518.29
Avino Silver & Gold MinesC$112.82M14.84C$2.62MC$0.2243.41

China Gold International Resources has a beta of 2.008914, indicating that its share price is 101% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avino Silver & Gold Mines has a beta of 3.203744, indicating that its share price is 220% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Avino Silver & Gold Mines beats China Gold International Resources on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to SilverCrest Metals?

SilverCrest Metals (TSE:SIL) and China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

SilverCrest Metals has a net margin of 47.62% compared to China Gold International Resources' net margin of 41.16%. SilverCrest Metals' return on equity of 34.36% beat China Gold International Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SilverCrest Metals47.62% 34.36% 18.98%
China Gold International Resources 41.16%27.74%-1.06%

In the previous week, SilverCrest Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled China Gold International Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
SilverCrest Metals Neutral
China Gold International Resources Neutral

SilverCrest Metals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than China Gold International Resources. SilverCrest Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SilverCrest MetalsC$193.10M0.00C$59.57MC$0.80N/A
China Gold International ResourcesC$1.49B7.56-C$15.76MC$1.5518.29

63.8% of SilverCrest Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of SilverCrest Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

SilverCrest Metals has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Gold International Resources has a beta of 2.008914, meaning that its stock price is 101% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

SilverCrest Metals beats China Gold International Resources on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get China Gold International Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CGG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CGG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CGG vs. The Competition

MetricChina Gold International ResourcesOther Precious Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$11.26BC$680.43MC$4.80BC$12.16B
Dividend Yield1.72%6.05%5.01%6.20%
P/E Ratio18.2913.5023.1337.64
Price / Sales7.563,819.826,750.5411.68
Price / Cash4.0313.0427.2182.29
Price / Book4.7214.166.734.50
Net Income-C$15.76M-C$4.87MC$157.11MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance5.57%1.25%1.39%2.48%
1 Month Performance-6.76%0.43%-0.42%1.47%
1 Year Performance172.39%99.08%74.38%53.55%

China Gold International Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CGG
China Gold International Resources
N/AC$28.41
+2.0%
N/A+169.0%C$11.26BC$1.49B18.292,089
PPTA
Perpetua Resources
1.8062 of 5 stars
C$35.10
-4.7%
C$55.00
+56.7%
+92.0%C$4.39BN/AN/A33
EDR
Endeavour Silver
3.5912 of 5 stars
C$12.69
-1.2%
C$19.23
+51.5%
+164.8%C$3.76BC$613.70MN/A11,000
SLS
Solaris Resources
1.5044 of 5 stars
C$13.20
-1.4%
C$19.50
+47.7%
+124.1%C$2.20BN/AN/A10
ASM
Avino Silver & Gold Mines
0.4038 of 5 stars
C$9.06
-1.2%
N/A+127.4%C$1.59BC$112.82M41.1834

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:CGG) was last updated on 5/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners