Free Trial
→ Nobody Understands Why Trump Is Invading Iran (here’s the answer) (From Banyan Hill Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free CGG Stock Alerts

China Gold International Resources (CGG) Competitors

China Gold International Resources logo
C$28.36 +0.14 (+0.50%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern
Compare

CGG vs. PPTA, EDR, SLS, ASM, and SIL

Should you be buying China Gold International Resources stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of China Gold International Resources include Perpetua Resources (PPTA), Endeavour Silver (EDR), Solaris Resources (SLS), Avino Silver & Gold Mines (ASM), and SilverCrest Metals (SIL). These companies are all part of the "other precious metals & mining" industry.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Perpetua Resources?

Perpetua Resources (TSE:PPTA) and China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk, profitability and dividends.

26.4% of Perpetua Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Perpetua Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

China Gold International Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Perpetua Resources. Perpetua Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Perpetua ResourcesN/AN/A-C$16.37M-C$1.08N/A
China Gold International ResourcesC$1.31B8.58-C$15.76MC$1.1824.07

Perpetua Resources currently has a consensus price target of C$55.00, suggesting a potential upside of 47.65%. Given Perpetua Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Perpetua Resources is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Perpetua Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
China Gold International Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 35.51% compared to Perpetua Resources' net margin of 0.00%. China Gold International Resources' return on equity of 22.42% beat Perpetua Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Perpetua ResourcesN/A -20.02% -29.12%
China Gold International Resources 35.51%22.42%-1.06%

Perpetua Resources has a beta of 1.097697, indicating that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Gold International Resources has a beta of 2.136958, indicating that its stock price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Perpetua Resources and Perpetua Resources both had 1 articles in the media. Perpetua Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled China Gold International Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Perpetua Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
China Gold International Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

China Gold International Resources beats Perpetua Resources on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Endeavour Silver?

China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) and Endeavour Silver (TSE:EDR) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Endeavour Silver has a consensus price target of C$19.23, indicating a potential upside of 64.78%. Given Endeavour Silver's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Endeavour Silver is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Gold International Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Endeavour Silver
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.67

In the previous week, China Gold International Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Endeavour Silver. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for China Gold International Resources and 0 mentions for Endeavour Silver. Endeavour Silver's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat China Gold International Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Endeavour Silver is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
China Gold International Resources Neutral
Endeavour Silver Positive

China Gold International Resources has a beta of 2.136958, indicating that its share price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Endeavour Silver has a beta of 3.164216, indicating that its share price is 216% more volatile than the S&P 500.

China Gold International Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Endeavour Silver. Endeavour Silver is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Gold International ResourcesC$1.31B8.58-C$15.76MC$1.1824.07
Endeavour SilverC$467.50M7.39-C$20.79M-C$0.42N/A

China Gold International Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Endeavour Silver pays an annual dividend of C$1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.4%. China Gold International Resources pays out 4.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Endeavour Silver pays out -371.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Endeavour Silver is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 35.51% compared to Endeavour Silver's net margin of -25.75%. China Gold International Resources' return on equity of 22.42% beat Endeavour Silver's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Gold International Resources35.51% 22.42% -1.06%
Endeavour Silver -25.75%-23.02%0.10%

24.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.4% of Endeavour Silver shares are held by institutional investors. 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Endeavour Silver shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Endeavour Silver beats China Gold International Resources on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Solaris Resources?

Solaris Resources (TSE:SLS) and China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

China Gold International Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Solaris Resources. Solaris Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Solaris ResourcesN/AN/A-C$46.49M-C$0.26N/A
China Gold International ResourcesC$1.31B8.58-C$15.76MC$1.1824.07

In the previous week, Solaris Resources and Solaris Resources both had 1 articles in the media. Solaris Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat China Gold International Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Solaris Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Solaris Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
China Gold International Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Solaris Resources presently has a consensus price target of C$19.50, indicating a potential upside of 47.17%. Given Solaris Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Solaris Resources is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Solaris Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
China Gold International Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Solaris Resources has a beta of 1.845161, indicating that its share price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Gold International Resources has a beta of 2.136958, indicating that its share price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500.

16.1% of Solaris Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.6% of Solaris Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 35.51% compared to Solaris Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Solaris Resources' return on equity of 96.23% beat China Gold International Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Solaris ResourcesN/A 96.23% -51.67%
China Gold International Resources 35.51%22.42%-1.06%

Summary

China Gold International Resources beats Solaris Resources on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Avino Silver & Gold Mines?

China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines (TSE:ASM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

Avino Silver & Gold Mines has lower revenue, but higher earnings than China Gold International Resources. China Gold International Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avino Silver & Gold Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Gold International ResourcesC$1.31B8.58-C$15.76MC$1.1824.07
Avino Silver & Gold MinesC$92.23M15.47C$2.62MC$0.1749.94

In the previous week, Avino Silver & Gold Mines had 2 more articles in the media than China Gold International Resources. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Avino Silver & Gold Mines and 1 mentions for China Gold International Resources. China Gold International Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Avino Silver & Gold Mines'average media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
China Gold International Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Avino Silver & Gold Mines
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

China Gold International Resources has a beta of 2.136958, indicating that its share price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Avino Silver & Gold Mines has a beta of 3.127935, indicating that its share price is 213% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Gold International Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Avino Silver & Gold Mines
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

24.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.8% of Avino Silver & Gold Mines shares are held by institutional investors. 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Avino Silver & Gold Mines shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 35.51% compared to Avino Silver & Gold Mines' net margin of 30.42%. China Gold International Resources' return on equity of 22.42% beat Avino Silver & Gold Mines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Gold International Resources35.51% 22.42% -1.06%
Avino Silver & Gold Mines 30.42%15.48%2.03%

Summary

Avino Silver & Gold Mines beats China Gold International Resources on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to SilverCrest Metals?

China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) and SilverCrest Metals (TSE:SIL) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, earnings and institutional ownership.

SilverCrest Metals has a net margin of 47.62% compared to China Gold International Resources' net margin of 35.51%. SilverCrest Metals' return on equity of 34.36% beat China Gold International Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Gold International Resources35.51% 22.42% -1.06%
SilverCrest Metals 47.62%34.36%18.98%

24.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.8% of SilverCrest Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of SilverCrest Metals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

China Gold International Resources has a beta of 2.136958, suggesting that its share price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SilverCrest Metals has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500.

SilverCrest Metals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than China Gold International Resources. SilverCrest Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Gold International ResourcesC$1.31B8.58-C$15.76MC$1.1824.07
SilverCrest MetalsC$193.10M0.00C$59.57MC$0.80N/A

In the previous week, China Gold International Resources had 1 more articles in the media than SilverCrest Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for China Gold International Resources and 0 mentions for SilverCrest Metals. China Gold International Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled SilverCrest Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
China Gold International Resources Neutral
SilverCrest Metals Neutral

Summary

China Gold International Resources beats SilverCrest Metals on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get China Gold International Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CGG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CGG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CGG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricChina Gold International ResourcesOther Precious Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$11.24BC$653.35MC$4.72BC$11.72B
Dividend Yield1.65%6.03%4.98%6.22%
P/E Ratio24.0712.3420.9723.83
Price / Sales8.583,619.857,339.1413.46
Price / Cash4.0313.0424.3582.69
Price / Book4.8113.617.704.48
Net Income-C$15.76M-C$4.87MC$159.29MC$300.68M
7 Day Performance-2.74%-2.03%0.01%0.12%
1 Month Performance-1.49%-0.03%2.58%2.88%
1 Year Performance221.18%102.76%76.05%57.78%

China Gold International Resources Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CGG
China Gold International Resources
N/AC$28.36
+0.5%		N/AN/AC$11.24BC$1.31B24.072,089
PPTA
Perpetua Resources
1.3229 of 5 stars		C$40.05
-0.8%		C$55.00
+37.3%		N/AC$5.00BN/AN/A33
EDR
Endeavour Silver
4.0571 of 5 stars		C$13.09
+1.1%		C$19.23
+46.9%		N/AC$3.87BC$467.50MN/A11,000
SLS
Solaris Resources
1.6716 of 5 stars		C$14.30
-0.1%		C$19.50
+36.4%		N/AC$2.39BN/AN/A10
ASM
Avino Silver & Gold Mines
0.1963 of 5 stars		C$9.44
-1.7%		N/AN/AC$1.59BC$92.23M55.5334

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:CGG) was last updated on 5/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Iran's New Leader Just Said Something That Should Terrify Every American
Iran's Supreme Leader has declared the Strait of Hormuz closed as leverage against the U.S. - and with 40% of ...
American Alternative | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Your Download Link (Expiring) If you still haven't downloaded the free Simple Options Trading For Beginners...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
My feud with Zohran Mamdani
Emmy-winning analyst releases his next big story Whitney Tilson shocked the nation on 60 Minutes when he ac...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $1.75T "Backdoor" ticker (NOT Starlink)
When the SpaceX IPO launches, most investors will already be too late. The real opportunity isn't the IPO itse...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Sell 99% of Your Stocks, Do THIS Instead…
Millionaire Trader Exposes: "The Single Stock Income Plan" With over 6,000 stocks on the market to choose ...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trade this between 9:30 and 10:45 am EST
The first 75 minutes of the trading day may be the most overlooked window for consistent opportunities.If you ...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon Unveils AI Passive Income Stream for Millions of Americans
During Tesla's last earnings call, Elon Musk outlined a new AI-driven approach he says could generate $30,000-...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel