Do analysts prefer CGG or FNV?

Franco-Nevada has a consensus price target of C$356.56, indicating a potential downside of 3.10%. Given Franco-Nevada's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Franco-Nevada is more favorable than China Gold International Resources. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score China Gold International Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Franco-Nevada 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 3 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.60

Does the media favor CGG or FNV?

In the previous week, China Gold International Resources had 3 more articles in the media than Franco-Nevada. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for China Gold International Resources and 1 mentions for Franco-Nevada. Franco-Nevada's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat China Gold International Resources' score of 0.32 indicating that Franco-Nevada is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment China Gold International Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Franco-Nevada 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate CGG or K?

Kinross Gold has a consensus price target of C$47.36, indicating a potential upside of 10.93%. Given Kinross Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than China Gold International Resources. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score China Gold International Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Kinross Gold 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Do analysts rate CGG or PAAS?

Pan American Silver has a consensus target price of C$84.40, suggesting a potential upside of 18.81%. Given Pan American Silver's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Pan American Silver is more favorable than China Gold International Resources. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score China Gold International Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Pan American Silver 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Do analysts prefer CGG or LUG?

Lundin Gold has a consensus target price of C$101.33, indicating a potential upside of 1.46%. Given Lundin Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Lundin Gold is more favorable than China Gold International Resources. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score China Gold International Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Lundin Gold 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media prefer CGG or LUG?

In the previous week, China Gold International Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Lundin Gold. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for China Gold International Resources and 3 mentions for Lundin Gold. Lundin Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat China Gold International Resources' score of 0.32 indicating that Lundin Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment China Gold International Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Lundin Gold 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer CGG or AGI?

Alamos Gold has a consensus target price of C$74.70, suggesting a potential upside of 46.01%. Given Alamos Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than China Gold International Resources. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score China Gold International Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Alamos Gold 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

China Gold International Resources (CGG) Competitors

C$45.95 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 09/4/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

CGG vs. FNV, K, PAAS, LUG, and AGI

Should you buy China Gold International Resources stock or one of its competitors? China Gold International Resources's main competitors and comparable companies include Franco-Nevada (FNV), Kinross Gold (K), Pan American Silver (PAAS), Lundin Gold (LUG), and Alamos Gold (AGI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Franco-Nevada?

China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) and Franco-Nevada (TSE:FNV) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

China Gold International Resources has a beta of 2.086641, indicating that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Franco-Nevada has a beta of 1.100692, indicating that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

Franco-Nevada has a consensus price target of C$356.56, indicating a potential downside of 3.10%. Given Franco-Nevada's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Franco-Nevada is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
China Gold International Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Franco-Nevada	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.60

China Gold International Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Franco-Nevada. China Gold International Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
China Gold International Resources	C$1.64B	11.08	-C$15.76M	C$1.95	23.53
Franco-Nevada	C$2.32B	30.64	-C$442.97M	C$7.65	48.10

In the previous week, China Gold International Resources had 3 more articles in the media than Franco-Nevada. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for China Gold International Resources and 1 mentions for Franco-Nevada. Franco-Nevada's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat China Gold International Resources' score of 0.32 indicating that Franco-Nevada is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
China Gold International Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Franco-Nevada	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

China Gold International Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of C$1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. China Gold International Resources pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Franco-Nevada pays out 21.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. China Gold International Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

22.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.2% of Franco-Nevada shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Franco-Nevada shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Franco-Nevada has a net margin of 63.83% compared to China Gold International Resources' net margin of 46.95%. China Gold International Resources' return on equity of 32.43% beat Franco-Nevada's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
China Gold International Resources	46.95%	32.43%	-1.06%
Franco-Nevada	63.83%	18.95%	-4.57%

Summary

Franco-Nevada beats China Gold International Resources on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Kinross Gold?

China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) and Kinross Gold (TSE:K) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than China Gold International Resources. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
China Gold International Resources	C$1.64B	11.08	-C$15.76M	C$1.95	23.53
Kinross Gold	C$8.47B	5.98	C$522.52M	C$2.63	16.23

In the previous week, China Gold International Resources had 3 more articles in the media than Kinross Gold. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for China Gold International Resources and 1 mentions for Kinross Gold. China Gold International Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat Kinross Gold's score of -0.54 indicating that China Gold International Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
China Gold International Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Kinross Gold	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative

China Gold International Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. China Gold International Resources pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kinross Gold pays out 5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

China Gold International Resources has a beta of 2.086641, indicating that its share price is 109% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kinross Gold has a beta of 1.683744, indicating that its share price is 68% more volatile than the broader market.

22.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.1% of Kinross Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Kinross Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 46.95% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of 37.56%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 35.91% beat China Gold International Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
China Gold International Resources	46.95%	32.43%	-1.06%
Kinross Gold	37.56%	35.91%	5.16%

Kinross Gold has a consensus price target of C$47.36, indicating a potential upside of 10.93%. Given Kinross Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
China Gold International Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Kinross Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Kinross Gold beats China Gold International Resources on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Pan American Silver?

China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) and Pan American Silver (TSE:PAAS) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 46.95% compared to Pan American Silver's net margin of 32.06%. China Gold International Resources' return on equity of 32.43% beat Pan American Silver's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
China Gold International Resources	46.95%	32.43%	-1.06%
Pan American Silver	32.06%	19.61%	0.43%

Pan American Silver has a consensus target price of C$84.40, suggesting a potential upside of 18.81%. Given Pan American Silver's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Pan American Silver is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
China Gold International Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Pan American Silver	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

China Gold International Resources has a beta of 2.086641, meaning that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan American Silver has a beta of 2.101154, meaning that its stock price is 110% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, China Gold International Resources had 4 more articles in the media than Pan American Silver. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for China Gold International Resources and 0 mentions for Pan American Silver. China Gold International Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat Pan American Silver's score of 0.00 indicating that China Gold International Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
China Gold International Resources	Neutral
Pan American Silver	Neutral

China Gold International Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Pan American Silver pays an annual dividend of C$0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. China Gold International Resources pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pan American Silver pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

22.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.1% of Pan American Silver shares are held by institutional investors. 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Pan American Silver shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

China Gold International Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pan American Silver. Pan American Silver is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
China Gold International Resources	C$1.64B	11.08	-C$15.76M	C$1.95	23.53
Pan American Silver	C$4.31B	6.83	-C$33.47M	C$3.38	21.02

Summary

China Gold International Resources and Pan American Silver tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Lundin Gold?

China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) and Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and media sentiment.

China Gold International Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Lundin Gold pays an annual dividend of C$3.95 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. China Gold International Resources pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lundin Gold pays out 102.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

22.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.7% of Lundin Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lundin Gold has higher revenue and earnings than China Gold International Resources. China Gold International Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
China Gold International Resources	C$1.64B	11.08	-C$15.76M	C$1.95	23.53
Lundin Gold	C$2.02B	11.96	C$215.94M	C$3.85	25.94

Lundin Gold has a consensus target price of C$101.33, indicating a potential upside of 1.46%. Given Lundin Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Lundin Gold is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
China Gold International Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Lundin Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 46.95% compared to Lundin Gold's net margin of 46.31%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 81.63% beat China Gold International Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
China Gold International Resources	46.95%	32.43%	-1.06%
Lundin Gold	46.31%	81.63%	17.59%

In the previous week, China Gold International Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Lundin Gold. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for China Gold International Resources and 3 mentions for Lundin Gold. Lundin Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat China Gold International Resources' score of 0.32 indicating that Lundin Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
China Gold International Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Lundin Gold	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

China Gold International Resources has a beta of 2.086641, meaning that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.643383, meaning that its stock price is 64% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Lundin Gold beats China Gold International Resources on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Alamos Gold?

China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) and Alamos Gold (TSE:AGI) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, risk, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, China Gold International Resources had 3 more articles in the media than Alamos Gold. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for China Gold International Resources and 1 mentions for Alamos Gold. China Gold International Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat Alamos Gold's score of 0.00 indicating that China Gold International Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
China Gold International Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Alamos Gold	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

China Gold International Resources has a beta of 2.086641, meaning that its share price is 109% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alamos Gold has a beta of 2.130234, meaning that its share price is 113% more volatile than the broader market.

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than China Gold International Resources. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
China Gold International Resources	C$1.64B	11.08	-C$15.76M	C$1.95	23.53
Alamos Gold	C$2.23B	9.61	C$174.87M	C$2.79	18.34

22.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.1% of Alamos Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Alamos Gold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

China Gold International Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Alamos Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. China Gold International Resources pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alamos Gold pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Alamos Gold has a consensus target price of C$74.70, suggesting a potential upside of 46.01%. Given Alamos Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
China Gold International Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Alamos Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 52.85% compared to China Gold International Resources' net margin of 46.95%. China Gold International Resources' return on equity of 32.43% beat Alamos Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
China Gold International Resources	46.95%	32.43%	-1.06%
Alamos Gold	52.85%	26.10%	5.85%

Summary

Alamos Gold beats China Gold International Resources on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get China Gold International Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CGG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CGG vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	China Gold International Resources	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$18.22B	C$4.02B	C$5.03B	C$12.48B
Dividend Yield	1.05%	5.16%	4.67%	6.25%
P/E Ratio	23.53	25.31	25.82	39.38
Price / Sales	11.08	9,532.09	5,672.75	9.93
Price / Cash	4.03	26.67	24.69	82.29
Price / Book	6.85	12.87	10.67	4.73
Net Income	-C$15.76M	C$127.55M	C$158.16M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	0.94%	-0.06%	-0.02%	0.10%
1 Month Performance	19.07%	12.80%	9.66%	0.91%
1 Year Performance	109.91%	53.85%	42.46%	27.60%

China Gold International Resources Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CGG China Gold International Resources	N/A	C$45.95 flat	N/A	+109.9%	C$18.22B	C$1.64B	23.53	2,089
FNV Franco-Nevada	1.0687 of 5 stars	C$369.97 -1.7%	C$356.56 -3.6%	+37.0%	C$71.36B	C$2.32B	48.36	40	Gap Up
K Kinross Gold	2.1386 of 5 stars	C$43.49 -3.5%	C$47.36 +8.9%	+39.4%	C$51.59B	C$8.47B	16.54	30,000	Gap Down
PAAS Pan American Silver	2.0851 of 5 stars	C$73.51 -3.4%	C$84.40 +14.8%	+48.3%	C$30.48B	C$4.31B	21.75	13,000	Gap Down
LUG Lundin Gold	1.4839 of 5 stars	C$100.28 -3.8%	C$101.33 +1.1%	+6.5%	C$24.25B	C$2.02B	26.05	1,645	Dividend Increase

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:CGG) was last updated on 9/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

China Gold International Resources (CGG) Competitors

CGG vs. FNV, K, PAAS, LUG, and AGI

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Franco-Nevada?

Summary

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Kinross Gold?

Summary

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Pan American Silver?

Summary

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Lundin Gold?

Summary

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Alamos Gold?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CGG vs. The Competition

China Gold International Resources Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

China Gold International Resources (CGG) Competitors

CGG vs. FNV, K, PAAS, LUG, and AGI

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Franco-Nevada?

Which has more risk & volatility, CGG or FNV?

Do analysts prefer CGG or FNV?

Which has better earnings & valuation, CGG or FNV?

Does the media favor CGG or FNV?

Is CGG or FNV a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in CGG or FNV?

Is CGG or FNV more profitable?

Summary

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Kinross Gold?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, CGG or K?

Does the media refer more to CGG or K?

Is CGG or K a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility & risk, CGG or K?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in CGG or K?

Is CGG or K more profitable?

Do analysts rate CGG or K?

Summary

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Pan American Silver?

Is CGG or PAAS more profitable?

Do analysts rate CGG or PAAS?

Which has more volatility and risk, CGG or PAAS?

Does the media prefer CGG or PAAS?

Is CGG or PAAS a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in CGG or PAAS?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CGG or PAAS?

Summary

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Lundin Gold?

Is CGG or LUG a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of CGG or LUG?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, CGG or LUG?

Do analysts prefer CGG or LUG?

Is CGG or LUG more profitable?

Does the media prefer CGG or LUG?

Which has more volatility & risk, CGG or LUG?

Summary

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Alamos Gold?

Does the media favor CGG or AGI?

Which has more risk & volatility, CGG or AGI?

Which has better earnings and valuation, CGG or AGI?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of CGG or AGI?

Is CGG or AGI a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer CGG or AGI?

Is CGG or AGI more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CGG vs. The Competition

China Gold International Resources Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools