Go Pro
→ Trump's New Dollar (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free CGG Stock Alerts

China Gold International Resources (CGG) Competitors

China Gold International Resources logo
C$30.15 +0.52 (+1.75%)
As of 11:37 AM Eastern
Compare

CGG vs. EDR, PPTA, SLS, SIL, and ASM

Should you buy China Gold International Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares China Gold International Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with China Gold International Resources include Endeavour Silver (EDR), Perpetua Resources (PPTA), Solaris Resources (SLS), SilverCrest Metals (SIL), and Avino Silver & Gold Mines (ASM). These companies are all part of the "other precious metals & mining" industry.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Endeavour Silver?

Endeavour Silver (TSE:EDR) and China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 41.16% compared to Endeavour Silver's net margin of -3.48%. China Gold International Resources' return on equity of 27.74% beat Endeavour Silver's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Endeavour Silver-3.48% -3.75% 0.10%
China Gold International Resources 41.16%27.74%-1.06%

Endeavour Silver currently has a consensus price target of C$19.23, suggesting a potential upside of 74.50%. Given Endeavour Silver's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Endeavour Silver is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Endeavour Silver
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.50
China Gold International Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Endeavour Silver pays an annual dividend of C$1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.2%. China Gold International Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Endeavour Silver pays out -2,600.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. China Gold International Resources pays out 3.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Endeavour Silver is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

China Gold International Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Endeavour Silver. Endeavour Silver is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Endeavour SilverC$613.70M5.32-C$20.79M-C$0.06N/A
China Gold International ResourcesC$1.49B8.06-C$15.76MC$1.5519.50

In the previous week, China Gold International Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Endeavour Silver. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for China Gold International Resources and 0 mentions for Endeavour Silver. Endeavour Silver's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled China Gold International Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Endeavour Silver Neutral
China Gold International Resources Neutral

Endeavour Silver has a beta of 3.251847, indicating that its share price is 225% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Gold International Resources has a beta of 1.852004, indicating that its share price is 85% more volatile than the broader market.

40.5% of Endeavour Silver shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.8% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Endeavour Silver shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Endeavour Silver and China Gold International Resources tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Perpetua Resources?

China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) and Perpetua Resources (TSE:PPTA) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

China Gold International Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Perpetua Resources. Perpetua Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Gold International ResourcesC$1.49B8.06-C$15.76MC$1.5519.50
Perpetua ResourcesN/AN/A-C$16.37M-C$1.35N/A

China Gold International Resources has a beta of 1.852004, suggesting that its share price is 85% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Perpetua Resources has a beta of 1.071946, suggesting that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

Perpetua Resources has a consensus price target of C$55.00, suggesting a potential upside of 116.79%. Given Perpetua Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Perpetua Resources is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Gold International Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Perpetua Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 41.16% compared to Perpetua Resources' net margin of 0.00%. China Gold International Resources' return on equity of 27.74% beat Perpetua Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Gold International Resources41.16% 27.74% -1.06%
Perpetua Resources N/A -20.71%-29.12%

24.8% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.2% of Perpetua Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Perpetua Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, China Gold International Resources and China Gold International Resources both had 1 articles in the media. China Gold International Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Perpetua Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
China Gold International Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Perpetua Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

China Gold International Resources beats Perpetua Resources on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Solaris Resources?

Solaris Resources (TSE:SLS) and China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and profitability.

In the previous week, China Gold International Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Solaris Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for China Gold International Resources and 0 mentions for Solaris Resources. Solaris Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled China Gold International Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Solaris Resources Neutral
China Gold International Resources Neutral

Solaris Resources has a beta of 1.777576, meaning that its share price is 78% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Gold International Resources has a beta of 1.852004, meaning that its share price is 85% more volatile than the broader market.

16.5% of Solaris Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.8% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.6% of Solaris Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

China Gold International Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Solaris Resources. Solaris Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Solaris ResourcesN/AN/A-C$46.49M-C$0.19N/A
China Gold International ResourcesC$1.49B8.06-C$15.76MC$1.5519.50

Solaris Resources currently has a consensus price target of C$19.50, indicating a potential upside of 82.76%. Given Solaris Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Solaris Resources is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Solaris Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
China Gold International Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 41.16% compared to Solaris Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Solaris Resources' return on equity of 60.97% beat China Gold International Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Solaris ResourcesN/A 60.97% -51.67%
China Gold International Resources 41.16%27.74%-1.06%

Summary

China Gold International Resources beats Solaris Resources on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to SilverCrest Metals?

SilverCrest Metals (TSE:SIL) and China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

SilverCrest Metals has a net margin of 47.62% compared to China Gold International Resources' net margin of 41.16%. SilverCrest Metals' return on equity of 30.14% beat China Gold International Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SilverCrest Metals47.62% 30.14% 18.98%
China Gold International Resources 41.16%27.74%-1.06%

63.8% of SilverCrest Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.8% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of SilverCrest Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, China Gold International Resources had 1 more articles in the media than SilverCrest Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for China Gold International Resources and 0 mentions for SilverCrest Metals. SilverCrest Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled China Gold International Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
SilverCrest Metals Neutral
China Gold International Resources Neutral

SilverCrest Metals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than China Gold International Resources. SilverCrest Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SilverCrest MetalsC$193.10M0.00C$59.57MC$0.80N/A
China Gold International ResourcesC$1.49B8.06-C$15.76MC$1.5519.50

SilverCrest Metals has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Gold International Resources has a beta of 1.852004, indicating that its stock price is 85% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

China Gold International Resources beats SilverCrest Metals on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Avino Silver & Gold Mines?

China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines (TSE:ASM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

Avino Silver & Gold Mines has lower revenue, but higher earnings than China Gold International Resources. China Gold International Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avino Silver & Gold Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Gold International ResourcesC$1.49B8.06-C$15.76MC$1.5519.50
Avino Silver & Gold MinesC$112.82M12.35C$2.62MC$0.2236.14

In the previous week, Avino Silver & Gold Mines had 2 more articles in the media than China Gold International Resources. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Avino Silver & Gold Mines and 1 mentions for China Gold International Resources. China Gold International Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Avino Silver & Gold Mines'average media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
China Gold International Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Avino Silver & Gold Mines
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

China Gold International Resources has a beta of 1.852004, meaning that its stock price is 85% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avino Silver & Gold Mines has a beta of 3.152428, meaning that its stock price is 215% more volatile than the broader market.

24.8% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.6% of Avino Silver & Gold Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Avino Silver & Gold Mines shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 41.16% compared to Avino Silver & Gold Mines' net margin of 33.31%. China Gold International Resources' return on equity of 27.74% beat Avino Silver & Gold Mines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Gold International Resources41.16% 27.74% -1.06%
Avino Silver & Gold Mines 33.31%17.62%2.03%

Summary

China Gold International Resources and Avino Silver & Gold Mines tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get China Gold International Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CGG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CGG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CGG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricChina Gold International ResourcesOther Precious Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$12.01BC$579.79MC$4.54BC$12.25B
Dividend Yield1.64%6.10%5.02%6.19%
P/E Ratio19.5012.3720.9736.69
Price / Sales8.063,598.215,726.489.56
Price / Cash4.0313.0424.0982.29
Price / Book5.0456.158.584.38
Net Income-C$15.76M-C$4.87MC$156.22MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance20.38%2.67%1.39%0.58%
1 Month Performance41.13%0.32%-1.52%0.11%
1 Year Performance149.18%44.42%35.69%29.89%

China Gold International Resources Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CGG
China Gold International Resources
N/AC$30.15
+1.8%		N/A+143.7%C$11.95BC$1.49B19.412,089
EDR
Endeavour Silver
2.9236 of 5 stars		C$10.97
-1.4%		C$19.23
+75.3%		+40.6%C$3.25BC$613.70MN/A11,000
PPTA
Perpetua Resources
1.451 of 5 stars		C$25.11
0.0%		C$55.00
+119.0%		+13.1%C$3.14BN/AN/A33
SLS
Solaris Resources
1.4292 of 5 stars		C$10.77
-0.3%		C$19.50
+81.1%		+58.0%C$1.80BN/AN/A10
SIL
SilverCrest Metals
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$1.54BC$193.10M18.31340

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:CGG) was last updated on 7/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon's new "super startup"
Adam O'Dell - the analyst who recommended Palantir before it became the top S&P 500 performer - has identified...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Where to Put $100 Before Trump's New Tech Law Rolls Out
The Financial Times says a new tech law puts America 'on the verge of a financial revolution.' Yahoo Finance e...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel