Do analysts recommend K or CGG?

Kinross Gold presently has a consensus price target of C$47.36, indicating a potential upside of 24.99%. Given Kinross Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than China Gold International Resources. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Kinross Gold 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 China Gold International Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Does the media favor K or CGG?

In the previous week, Kinross Gold and Kinross Gold both had 1 articles in the media. Kinross Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat China Gold International Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Kinross Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Kinross Gold 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral China Gold International Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend CGG or PAAS?

Pan American Silver has a consensus price target of C$84.40, suggesting a potential upside of 28.23%. Given Pan American Silver's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Pan American Silver is more favorable than China Gold International Resources. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score China Gold International Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Pan American Silver 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Do analysts recommend LUG or CGG?

Lundin Gold presently has a consensus price target of C$101.33, indicating a potential upside of 12.09%. Given Lundin Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Lundin Gold is more favorable than China Gold International Resources. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Lundin Gold 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 China Gold International Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Do analysts prefer AGI or CGG?

Alamos Gold presently has a consensus target price of C$74.70, suggesting a potential upside of 61.17%. Given Alamos Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than China Gold International Resources. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Alamos Gold 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 China Gold International Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Does the media prefer AGI or CGG?

In the previous week, Alamos Gold and Alamos Gold both had 1 articles in the media. China Gold International Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Alamos Gold's score of -0.60 indicating that China Gold International Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Alamos Gold 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Negative China Gold International Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer EDV or CGG?

Endeavour Mining presently has a consensus target price of C$93.50, indicating a potential upside of 21.59%. Given Endeavour Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Endeavour Mining is more favorable than China Gold International Resources. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Endeavour Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67 China Gold International Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Does the media favor EDV or CGG?

In the previous week, Endeavour Mining and Endeavour Mining both had 1 articles in the media. Endeavour Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.04 beat China Gold International Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Endeavour Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Endeavour Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral China Gold International Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

China Gold International Resources (CGG) Competitors

C$37.89 +3.68 (+10.76%)

As of 08/14/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

CGG vs. K, PAAS, LUG, AGI, and EDV

Should you buy China Gold International Resources stock or one of its competitors? China Gold International Resources's main competitors and comparable companies include Kinross Gold (K), Pan American Silver (PAAS), Lundin Gold (LUG), Alamos Gold (AGI), and Endeavour Mining (EDV). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Kinross Gold?

Kinross Gold (TSE:K) and China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership and dividends.

Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. China Gold International Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Kinross Gold pays out 5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. China Gold International Resources pays out 3.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 41.16% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of 37.56%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 35.91% beat China Gold International Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Kinross Gold	37.56%	35.91%	5.16%
China Gold International Resources	41.16%	27.74%	-1.06%

Kinross Gold presently has a consensus price target of C$47.36, indicating a potential upside of 24.99%. Given Kinross Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Kinross Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
China Gold International Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Kinross Gold and Kinross Gold both had 1 articles in the media. Kinross Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat China Gold International Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Kinross Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Kinross Gold	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
China Gold International Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

48.6% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.6% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Kinross Gold has a beta of 1.480211, suggesting that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Gold International Resources has a beta of 1.877336, suggesting that its stock price is 88% more volatile than the broader market.

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than China Gold International Resources. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Kinross Gold	C$8.47B	5.31	C$522.52M	C$2.63	14.41
China Gold International Resources	C$1.64B	9.14	-C$15.76M	C$1.55	24.39

Summary

Kinross Gold beats China Gold International Resources on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Pan American Silver?

China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) and Pan American Silver (TSE:PAAS) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Pan American Silver had 3 more articles in the media than China Gold International Resources. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Pan American Silver and 1 mentions for China Gold International Resources. Pan American Silver's average media sentiment score of 0.36 beat China Gold International Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Pan American Silver is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
China Gold International Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Pan American Silver	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

24.6% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.5% of Pan American Silver shares are held by institutional investors. 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Pan American Silver shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

China Gold International Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pan American Silver. Pan American Silver is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
China Gold International Resources	C$1.64B	9.14	-C$15.76M	C$1.55	24.39
Pan American Silver	C$4.31B	6.33	-C$33.47M	C$3.38	19.47

China Gold International Resources has a beta of 1.877336, meaning that its share price is 88% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan American Silver has a beta of 1.980443, meaning that its share price is 98% more volatile than the broader market.

China Gold International Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Pan American Silver pays an annual dividend of C$0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. China Gold International Resources pays out 3.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pan American Silver pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Pan American Silver has a consensus price target of C$84.40, suggesting a potential upside of 28.23%. Given Pan American Silver's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Pan American Silver is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
China Gold International Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Pan American Silver	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 41.16% compared to Pan American Silver's net margin of 31.69%. China Gold International Resources' return on equity of 27.74% beat Pan American Silver's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
China Gold International Resources	41.16%	27.74%	-1.06%
Pan American Silver	31.69%	19.65%	0.43%

Summary

Pan American Silver beats China Gold International Resources on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Lundin Gold?

Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) and China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

24.3% of Lundin Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.6% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lundin Gold pays an annual dividend of C$3.95 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. China Gold International Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Lundin Gold pays out 102.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. China Gold International Resources pays out 3.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.619444, suggesting that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Gold International Resources has a beta of 1.877336, suggesting that its stock price is 88% more volatile than the broader market.

Lundin Gold has a net margin of 46.31% compared to China Gold International Resources' net margin of 41.16%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 81.63% beat China Gold International Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lundin Gold	46.31%	81.63%	17.59%
China Gold International Resources	41.16%	27.74%	-1.06%

In the previous week, Lundin Gold had 3 more articles in the media than China Gold International Resources. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Lundin Gold and 1 mentions for China Gold International Resources. China Gold International Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Lundin Gold's score of -0.59 indicating that China Gold International Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lundin Gold	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative
China Gold International Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Lundin Gold has higher revenue and earnings than China Gold International Resources. Lundin Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lundin Gold	C$2.02B	10.83	C$215.94M	C$3.85	23.48
China Gold International Resources	C$1.64B	9.14	-C$15.76M	C$1.55	24.39

Lundin Gold presently has a consensus price target of C$101.33, indicating a potential upside of 12.09%. Given Lundin Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Lundin Gold is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lundin Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
China Gold International Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

Lundin Gold beats China Gold International Resources on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Alamos Gold?

Alamos Gold (TSE:AGI) and China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than China Gold International Resources. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Alamos Gold	C$2.23B	8.71	C$174.87M	C$2.79	16.61
China Gold International Resources	C$1.64B	9.14	-C$15.76M	C$1.55	24.39

Alamos Gold has a beta of 1.871669, indicating that its stock price is 87% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Gold International Resources has a beta of 1.877336, indicating that its stock price is 88% more volatile than the broader market.

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 52.85% compared to China Gold International Resources' net margin of 41.16%. China Gold International Resources' return on equity of 27.74% beat Alamos Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Alamos Gold	52.85%	26.10%	5.85%
China Gold International Resources	41.16%	27.74%	-1.06%

In the previous week, Alamos Gold and Alamos Gold both had 1 articles in the media. China Gold International Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Alamos Gold's score of -0.60 indicating that China Gold International Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Alamos Gold	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative
China Gold International Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Alamos Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. China Gold International Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Alamos Gold pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. China Gold International Resources pays out 3.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Alamos Gold presently has a consensus target price of C$74.70, suggesting a potential upside of 61.17%. Given Alamos Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Alamos Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
China Gold International Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

52.1% of Alamos Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.6% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Alamos Gold shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Alamos Gold beats China Gold International Resources on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Endeavour Mining?

Endeavour Mining (TSE:EDV) and China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and dividends.

Endeavour Mining has a beta of 1.817844, indicating that its share price is 82% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Gold International Resources has a beta of 1.877336, indicating that its share price is 88% more volatile than the broader market.

China Gold International Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Endeavour Mining. Endeavour Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Endeavour Mining	C$4.75B	3.90	-C$239.30M	C$3.40	22.62
China Gold International Resources	C$1.64B	9.14	-C$15.76M	C$1.55	24.39

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 41.16% compared to Endeavour Mining's net margin of 17.62%. China Gold International Resources' return on equity of 27.74% beat Endeavour Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Endeavour Mining	17.62%	26.17%	3.54%
China Gold International Resources	41.16%	27.74%	-1.06%

In the previous week, Endeavour Mining and Endeavour Mining both had 1 articles in the media. Endeavour Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.04 beat China Gold International Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Endeavour Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Endeavour Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
China Gold International Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

59.5% of Endeavour Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.6% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.1% of Endeavour Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Endeavour Mining presently has a consensus target price of C$93.50, indicating a potential upside of 21.59%. Given Endeavour Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Endeavour Mining is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Endeavour Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
China Gold International Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Endeavour Mining pays an annual dividend of C$1.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. China Gold International Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Endeavour Mining pays out 42.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. China Gold International Resources pays out 3.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Endeavour Mining beats China Gold International Resources on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get China Gold International Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CGG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CGG vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	China Gold International Resources	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$13.56B	C$3.77B	C$4.85B	C$12.73B
Dividend Yield	1.43%	5.24%	4.72%	6.20%
P/E Ratio	24.39	23.66	25.57	37.38
Price / Sales	9.14	7,609.61	4,521.02	9.94
Price / Cash	4.03	29.69	27.12	82.29
Price / Book	6.30	10.41	8.85	4.58
Net Income	-C$15.76M	C$122.18M	C$154.16M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-1.81%	1.28%	0.95%	0.93%
1 Month Performance	50.84%	10.78%	8.66%	4.85%
1 Year Performance	170.64%	54.75%	43.24%	35.29%

China Gold International Resources Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CGG China Gold International Resources	N/A	C$37.89 +10.8%	N/A	+170.6%	C$13.56B	C$1.64B	24.39	2,089	News Coverage Gap Up
K Kinross Gold	3.527 of 5 stars	C$38.52 +7.2%	C$47.36 +22.9%	+41.7%	C$45.69B	C$8.47B	14.65	30,000
PAAS Pan American Silver	3.1362 of 5 stars	C$71.45 +6.0%	C$84.40 +18.1%	+50.1%	C$30.11B	C$4B	22.54	13,000	News Coverage Earnings Report Gap Up
LUG Lundin Gold	2.2324 of 5 stars	C$92.03 +6.1%	C$102.17 +11.0%	+13.7%	C$22.26B	C$1.99B	24.41	1,645	Gap Up
AGI Alamos Gold	2.6836 of 5 stars	C$46.26 +6.0%	C$74.70 +61.5%	+29.2%	C$19.36B	C$2.23B	16.58	2,400	Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:CGG) was last updated on 8/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

China Gold International Resources (CGG) Competitors

CGG vs. K, PAAS, LUG, AGI, and EDV

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Kinross Gold?

Summary

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Pan American Silver?

Summary

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Lundin Gold?

Summary

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Alamos Gold?

Summary

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Endeavour Mining?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CGG vs. The Competition

China Gold International Resources Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

China Gold International Resources (CGG) Competitors

CGG vs. K, PAAS, LUG, AGI, and EDV

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Kinross Gold?

Is K or CGG a better dividend stock?

Is K or CGG more profitable?

Do analysts recommend K or CGG?

Does the media favor K or CGG?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in K or CGG?

Which has more volatility and risk, K or CGG?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, K or CGG?

Summary

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Pan American Silver?

Does the media refer more to CGG or PAAS?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in CGG or PAAS?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, CGG or PAAS?

Which has more risk & volatility, CGG or PAAS?

Is CGG or PAAS a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend CGG or PAAS?

Is CGG or PAAS more profitable?

Summary

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Lundin Gold?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in LUG or CGG?

Is LUG or CGG a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, LUG or CGG?

Is LUG or CGG more profitable?

Does the media prefer LUG or CGG?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, LUG or CGG?

Do analysts recommend LUG or CGG?

Summary

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Alamos Gold?

Which has better earnings & valuation, AGI or CGG?

Which has more risk and volatility, AGI or CGG?

Is AGI or CGG more profitable?

Does the media prefer AGI or CGG?

Is AGI or CGG a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer AGI or CGG?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in AGI or CGG?

Summary

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Endeavour Mining?

Which has more volatility & risk, EDV or CGG?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, EDV or CGG?

Is EDV or CGG more profitable?

Does the media favor EDV or CGG?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in EDV or CGG?

Do analysts prefer EDV or CGG?

Is EDV or CGG a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CGG vs. The Competition

China Gold International Resources Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools