Go Pro
→ Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE (From Base Camp Trading) (Ad)tc pixel Free CGG Stock Alerts

China Gold International Resources (CGG) Competitors

China Gold International Resources logo
C$40.81 +0.19 (+0.47%)
As of 09/25/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Compare

CGG vs. FNV, K, PAAS, LUG, and EDV

Should you buy China Gold International Resources stock or one of its competitors? China Gold International Resources's main competitors and comparable companies include Franco-Nevada (FNV), Kinross Gold (K), Pan American Silver (PAAS), Lundin Gold (LUG), and Endeavour Mining (EDV). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Franco-Nevada?

China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) and Franco-Nevada (TSE:FNV) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

22.2% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.2% of Franco-Nevada shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Franco-Nevada shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Franco-Nevada has a net margin of 63.83% compared to China Gold International Resources' net margin of 46.95%. China Gold International Resources' return on equity of 32.43% beat Franco-Nevada's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Gold International Resources46.95% 32.43% -1.06%
Franco-Nevada 63.83%18.95%-4.57%

Franco-Nevada has a consensus target price of C$356.56, suggesting a potential downside of 2.22%. Given Franco-Nevada's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Franco-Nevada is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Gold International Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Franco-Nevada
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.60

In the previous week, Franco-Nevada had 2 more articles in the media than China Gold International Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Franco-Nevada and 0 mentions for China Gold International Resources. China Gold International Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Franco-Nevada'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
China Gold International Resources Neutral
Franco-Nevada Neutral

China Gold International Resources has a beta of 2.086641, suggesting that its share price is 109% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Franco-Nevada has a beta of 1.100692, suggesting that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

China Gold International Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of C$1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. China Gold International Resources pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Franco-Nevada pays out 21.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. China Gold International Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

China Gold International Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Franco-Nevada. China Gold International Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Gold International ResourcesC$1.64B9.84-C$15.76MC$1.9520.90
Franco-NevadaC$2.32B30.36-C$442.97MC$7.6547.67

Summary

Franco-Nevada beats China Gold International Resources on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Kinross Gold?

China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) and Kinross Gold (TSE:K) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than China Gold International Resources. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Gold International ResourcesC$1.64B9.84-C$15.76MC$1.9520.90
Kinross GoldC$8.47B5.00C$522.52MC$2.6313.48

China Gold International Resources has a beta of 2.086641, suggesting that its share price is 109% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kinross Gold has a beta of 1.683744, suggesting that its share price is 68% more volatile than the broader market.

Kinross Gold has a consensus price target of C$47.64, suggesting a potential upside of 34.36%. Given Kinross Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Gold International Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Kinross Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 46.95% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of 37.56%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 35.91% beat China Gold International Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Gold International Resources46.95% 32.43% -1.06%
Kinross Gold 37.56%35.91%5.16%

22.2% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.5% of Kinross Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Kinross Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Kinross Gold had 13 more articles in the media than China Gold International Resources. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Kinross Gold and 0 mentions for China Gold International Resources. China Gold International Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Kinross Gold's score of -0.36 indicating that China Gold International Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
China Gold International Resources Neutral
Kinross Gold Neutral

China Gold International Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. China Gold International Resources pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kinross Gold pays out 5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Kinross Gold beats China Gold International Resources on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Pan American Silver?

China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) and Pan American Silver (TSE:PAAS) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Pan American Silver has a consensus target price of C$84.40, indicating a potential upside of 24.14%. Given Pan American Silver's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Pan American Silver is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Gold International Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Pan American Silver
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

22.2% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.1% of Pan American Silver shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Pan American Silver shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

China Gold International Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pan American Silver. Pan American Silver is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Gold International ResourcesC$1.64B9.84-C$15.76MC$1.9520.90
Pan American SilverC$4.31B6.54-C$33.47MC$3.3820.12

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 46.95% compared to Pan American Silver's net margin of 32.06%. China Gold International Resources' return on equity of 32.43% beat Pan American Silver's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Gold International Resources46.95% 32.43% -1.06%
Pan American Silver 32.06%19.61%0.43%

In the previous week, Pan American Silver had 1 more articles in the media than China Gold International Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Pan American Silver and 0 mentions for China Gold International Resources. China Gold International Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pan American Silver'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
China Gold International Resources Neutral
Pan American Silver Neutral

China Gold International Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Pan American Silver pays an annual dividend of C$0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. China Gold International Resources pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pan American Silver pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

China Gold International Resources has a beta of 2.086641, indicating that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan American Silver has a beta of 2.101154, indicating that its stock price is 110% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pan American Silver beats China Gold International Resources on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Lundin Gold?

China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) and Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

Lundin Gold has higher revenue and earnings than China Gold International Resources. China Gold International Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Gold International ResourcesC$1.64B9.84-C$15.76MC$1.9520.90
Lundin GoldC$2.02B10.97C$215.94MC$3.8523.79

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 46.95% compared to Lundin Gold's net margin of 46.31%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 81.63% beat China Gold International Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Gold International Resources46.95% 32.43% -1.06%
Lundin Gold 46.31%81.63%17.59%

China Gold International Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Lundin Gold pays an annual dividend of C$3.95 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. China Gold International Resources pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lundin Gold pays out 102.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

22.2% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.2% of Lundin Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Lundin Gold had 3 more articles in the media than China Gold International Resources. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Lundin Gold and 0 mentions for China Gold International Resources. China Gold International Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Lundin Gold'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
China Gold International Resources Neutral
Lundin Gold Neutral

Lundin Gold has a consensus price target of C$99.33, indicating a potential upside of 8.45%. Given Lundin Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Lundin Gold is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Gold International Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Lundin Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

China Gold International Resources has a beta of 2.086641, suggesting that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.643383, suggesting that its stock price is 64% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Lundin Gold beats China Gold International Resources on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Gold International Resources compare to Endeavour Mining?

China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) and Endeavour Mining (TSE:EDV) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

China Gold International Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Endeavour Mining. China Gold International Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Endeavour Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Gold International ResourcesC$1.64B9.84-C$15.76MC$1.9520.90
Endeavour MiningC$4.75B4.30-C$239.30MC$3.4024.96

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 46.95% compared to Endeavour Mining's net margin of 17.62%. China Gold International Resources' return on equity of 32.43% beat Endeavour Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Gold International Resources46.95% 32.43% -1.06%
Endeavour Mining 17.62%26.17%3.54%

China Gold International Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Endeavour Mining pays an annual dividend of C$1.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. China Gold International Resources pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Endeavour Mining pays out 42.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

22.2% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.5% of Endeavour Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.1% of Endeavour Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Endeavour Mining had 1 more articles in the media than China Gold International Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Endeavour Mining and 0 mentions for China Gold International Resources. Endeavour Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat China Gold International Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Endeavour Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
China Gold International Resources Neutral
Endeavour Mining Positive

Endeavour Mining has a consensus target price of C$93.50, suggesting a potential upside of 10.19%. Given Endeavour Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Endeavour Mining is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Gold International Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Endeavour Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

China Gold International Resources has a beta of 2.086641, suggesting that its share price is 109% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Endeavour Mining has a beta of 1.897713, suggesting that its share price is 90% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Endeavour Mining beats China Gold International Resources on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get China Gold International Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CGG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CGG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CGG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricChina Gold International ResourcesMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$16.18BC$3.85BC$4.83BC$12.76B
Dividend Yield1.20%5.22%4.73%6.29%
P/E Ratio20.9025.5325.7839.92
Price / Sales9.8428,992.5417,223.889.23
Price / Cash4.0329.2126.6682.29
Price / Book6.0811.989.974.67
Net Income-C$15.76MC$127.53MC$158.14MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-14.39%0.32%0.02%-0.28%
1 Month Performance-10.11%-3.46%-3.36%-2.93%
1 Year Performance67.39%27.97%23.50%19.28%

China Gold International Resources Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CGG
China Gold International Resources
N/AC$40.81
+0.5%		N/A+67.4%C$16.18BC$1.64B20.902,351
FNV
Franco-Nevada
0.4108 of 5 stars		C$373.80
+0.1%		C$356.56
-4.6%		+20.3%C$72.10BC$2.32B48.8638
K
Kinross Gold
3.3826 of 5 stars		C$39.25
-1.6%		C$47.36
+20.7%		+5.6%C$46.87BC$8.47B14.927,100
PAAS
Pan American Silver
2.1716 of 5 stars		C$70.00
+0.8%		C$84.40
+20.6%		+27.2%C$29.02BC$4.31B20.719,348
LUG
Lundin Gold
1.6064 of 5 stars		C$91.75
+0.5%		C$99.33
+8.3%		+3.1%C$22.19BC$2.02B23.831,893

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:CGG) was last updated on 9/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s Why Trump Won’t End The Iran War
Trump has called an Iran deal close 38 times since the war began, yet the fighting keeps flaring back up. O...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Bank of America: 'Digital Dollar Inevitable'
Bank of America just revealed your expiration date. In their Bloomberg interview, they didn't just predict the...
Decentralized Masters | Sponsoredtc pixel
These gold assets are priced for $1,800 gold [it's over $4,000]
Gold's major miners are generating record free cash flow, with margins as high as 75 percent even after gold's...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel