Go Pro

Cargojet (CJT) Competitors

Cargojet logo
C$89.26 -2.34 (-2.55%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

CJT vs. AND, TTR, SES, RUS, and BBU.UN

Should you buy Cargojet stock or one of its competitors? Cargojet's main competitors and comparable companies include Andlauer Healthcare Group (AND), Titanium Transportation Group (TTR), Secure Energy Services (SES), Russel Metals (RUS), and Brookfield Business Partners (BBU.UN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrials" sector.

How does Cargojet compare to Andlauer Healthcare Group?

Cargojet (TSE:CJT) and Andlauer Healthcare Group (TSE:AND) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

Cargojet has a beta of 1.019766, meaning that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Andlauer Healthcare Group has a beta of 0.573967, meaning that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Andlauer Healthcare Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cargojet. Andlauer Healthcare Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cargojet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CargojetC$1.04B1.29C$2.30MC$2.4536.43
Andlauer Healthcare GroupC$650.58M3.31C$66.28MC$1.7032.34

20.1% of Cargojet shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.7% of Andlauer Healthcare Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of Cargojet shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Andlauer Healthcare Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Cargojet had 19 more articles in the media than Andlauer Healthcare Group. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Cargojet and 0 mentions for Andlauer Healthcare Group. Cargojet's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Andlauer Healthcare Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Cargojet is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cargojet Positive
Andlauer Healthcare Group Neutral

Cargojet pays an annual dividend of C$1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Andlauer Healthcare Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Cargojet pays out 58.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Andlauer Healthcare Group pays out 27.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Cargojet presently has a consensus price target of C$120.92, suggesting a potential upside of 35.47%. Given Cargojet's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cargojet is more favorable than Andlauer Healthcare Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cargojet
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91
Andlauer Healthcare Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Andlauer Healthcare Group has a net margin of 10.44% compared to Cargojet's net margin of 4.49%. Andlauer Healthcare Group's return on equity of 7.62% beat Cargojet's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cargojet4.49% 6.30% 1.95%
Andlauer Healthcare Group 10.44%7.62%8.52%

Summary

Cargojet beats Andlauer Healthcare Group on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cargojet compare to Titanium Transportation Group?

Titanium Transportation Group (CVE:TTR) and Cargojet (TSE:CJT) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and earnings.

In the previous week, Cargojet had 19 more articles in the media than Titanium Transportation Group. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Cargojet and 0 mentions for Titanium Transportation Group. Cargojet's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Titanium Transportation Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Cargojet is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Titanium Transportation Group Neutral
Cargojet Positive

Cargojet has a consensus target price of C$120.92, indicating a potential upside of 35.47%. Given Cargojet's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cargojet is more favorable than Titanium Transportation Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Titanium Transportation Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Cargojet
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91

Cargojet has a net margin of 4.49% compared to Titanium Transportation Group's net margin of 0.00%. Cargojet's return on equity of 6.30% beat Titanium Transportation Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Titanium Transportation GroupN/A N/A N/A
Cargojet 4.49%6.30%1.95%

Titanium Transportation Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Cargojet pays an annual dividend of C$1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Titanium Transportation Group pays out 36.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cargojet pays out 58.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Titanium Transportation Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Titanium Transportation Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cargojet. Titanium Transportation Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cargojet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Titanium Transportation GroupC$449.76M0.24C$9.81MC$0.2211.09
CargojetC$1.04B1.29C$2.30MC$2.4536.43

20.1% of Cargojet shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Cargojet shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Cargojet beats Titanium Transportation Group on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cargojet compare to Secure Energy Services?

Cargojet (TSE:CJT) and Secure Energy Services (TSE:SES) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Cargojet had 19 more articles in the media than Secure Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Cargojet and 0 mentions for Secure Energy Services. Secure Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.43 beat Cargojet's score of 0.86 indicating that Secure Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cargojet Positive
Secure Energy Services Positive

Cargojet has a net margin of 4.49% compared to Secure Energy Services' net margin of -4.56%. Secure Energy Services' return on equity of 16.77% beat Cargojet's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cargojet4.49% 6.30% 1.95%
Secure Energy Services -4.56%16.77%8.15%

Cargojet has a beta of 1.019766, meaning that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Secure Energy Services has a beta of 0.136286, meaning that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.

Cargojet currently has a consensus target price of C$120.92, indicating a potential upside of 35.47%. Secure Energy Services has a consensus target price of C$23.16, indicating a potential downside of 4.67%. Given Cargojet's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Cargojet is more favorable than Secure Energy Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cargojet
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91
Secure Energy Services
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

20.1% of Cargojet shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.2% of Secure Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Cargojet shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Secure Energy Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cargojet pays an annual dividend of C$1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Secure Energy Services pays an annual dividend of C$0.41 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Cargojet pays out 58.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Secure Energy Services pays out 69.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Secure Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Cargojet. Cargojet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Secure Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CargojetC$1.04B1.29C$2.30MC$2.4536.43
Secure Energy ServicesC$1.54B3.43C$590.18MC$0.5941.17

Summary

Cargojet and Secure Energy Services tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cargojet compare to Russel Metals?

Russel Metals (TSE:RUS) and Cargojet (TSE:CJT) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and dividends.

Russel Metals pays an annual dividend of C$1.73 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Cargojet pays an annual dividend of C$1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Russel Metals pays out 44.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cargojet pays out 58.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Russel Metals is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Russel Metals has a beta of 1.212787, indicating that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cargojet has a beta of 1.019766, indicating that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

Russel Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Cargojet. Russel Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cargojet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Russel MetalsC$5.33B0.82C$178.38MC$3.9220.34
CargojetC$1.04B1.29C$2.30MC$2.4536.43

31.3% of Russel Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.1% of Cargojet shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Russel Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Cargojet shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Russel Metals had 10 more articles in the media than Cargojet. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Russel Metals and 19 mentions for Cargojet. Cargojet's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Russel Metals' score of 0.58 indicating that Cargojet is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Russel Metals
8 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Cargojet
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Cargojet has a net margin of 4.49% compared to Russel Metals' net margin of 4.04%. Russel Metals' return on equity of 13.09% beat Cargojet's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Russel Metals4.04% 13.09% 6.48%
Cargojet 4.49%6.30%1.95%

Russel Metals presently has a consensus price target of C$76.89, suggesting a potential downside of 3.56%. Cargojet has a consensus price target of C$120.92, suggesting a potential upside of 35.47%. Given Cargojet's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cargojet is more favorable than Russel Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Russel Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Cargojet
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91

Summary

Russel Metals beats Cargojet on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cargojet compare to Brookfield Business Partners?

Brookfield Business Partners (TSE:BBU.UN) and Cargojet (TSE:CJT) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Brookfield Business Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Cargojet. Brookfield Business Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cargojet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brookfield Business PartnersC$27.46B0.15C$483M-C$0.29N/A
CargojetC$1.04B1.29C$2.30MC$2.4536.43

In the previous week, Cargojet had 19 more articles in the media than Brookfield Business Partners. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Cargojet and 0 mentions for Brookfield Business Partners. Cargojet's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Brookfield Business Partners' score of 0.00 indicating that Cargojet is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Brookfield Business Partners Neutral
Cargojet Positive

Brookfield Business Partners has a beta of 1.586063, meaning that its stock price is 59% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cargojet has a beta of 1.019766, meaning that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

Brookfield Business Partners pays an annual dividend of C$0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Cargojet pays an annual dividend of C$1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Brookfield Business Partners pays out -85.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cargojet pays out 58.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Cargojet has a net margin of 4.49% compared to Brookfield Business Partners' net margin of 0.93%. Brookfield Business Partners' return on equity of 20.49% beat Cargojet's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brookfield Business Partners0.93% 20.49% 2.45%
Cargojet 4.49%6.30%1.95%

11.7% of Brookfield Business Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.1% of Cargojet shares are held by institutional investors. 4.0% of Brookfield Business Partners shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Cargojet shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cargojet has a consensus target price of C$120.92, suggesting a potential upside of 35.47%. Given Cargojet's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cargojet is more favorable than Brookfield Business Partners.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brookfield Business Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Cargojet
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91

Summary

Cargojet beats Brookfield Business Partners on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cargojet News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CJT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CJT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CJT vs. The Competition

MetricCargojetAir Freight & Logistics IndustryIndustrials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$1.33BC$9.97BC$10.94BC$12.55B
Dividend Yield1.79%3.04%96.89%6.20%
P/E Ratio36.4312.6827.9830.67
Price / Sales1.297.31342.069.74
Price / Cash347.1625.4224.9082.29
Price / Book1.812.224.584.64
Net IncomeC$2.30MC$642.62MC$609.43MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance2.82%-0.24%0.79%0.90%
1 Month Performance6.46%3.75%3.21%3.86%
1 Year Performance-14.18%-10.87%14.26%35.99%

Cargojet Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CJT
Cargojet
3.7166 of 5 stars
C$89.26
-2.6%
C$120.92
+35.5%
-12.8%C$1.33BC$1.04B36.431,838
AND
Andlauer Healthcare Group
N/AC$54.97
+0.0%
N/A+2.7%C$2.15BC$650.58M32.342,290
TTR
Titanium Transportation Group
N/AC$2.44
+4.7%
N/A+0.0%C$108.82MC$449.76M11.091,100
SES
Secure Energy Services
1.0197 of 5 stars
C$24.24
+0.3%
C$23.16
-4.5%
+48.4%C$5.29BC$1.54B41.08130
RUS
Russel Metals
3.2974 of 5 stars
C$80.61
-0.7%
C$76.89
-4.6%
+96.7%C$4.43BC$4.89B22.643,500

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:CJT) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners