Go Pro
→ Your book attached (From Profits Run) (Ad)tc pixel Free CMG Stock Alerts

Computer Modelling Group (CMG) Competitors

Computer Modelling Group logo
C$4.22 -0.02 (-0.47%)
As of 10/2/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Compare

CMG vs. HIVE, ENGH, DCBO, ABST, and KSI

Should you buy Computer Modelling Group stock or one of its competitors? Computer Modelling Group's main competitors and comparable companies include HIVE Digital Technologies (HIVE), Enghouse Systems (ENGH), Docebo (DCBO), Absolute Software (ABST), and kneat.com (KSI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "application software" industry.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to HIVE Digital Technologies?

Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) and HIVE Digital Technologies (CVE:HIVE) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

In the previous week, Computer Modelling Group had 3 more articles in the media than HIVE Digital Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Computer Modelling Group and 0 mentions for HIVE Digital Technologies. Computer Modelling Group's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat HIVE Digital Technologies' score of 0.15 indicating that Computer Modelling Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Computer Modelling Group Positive
HIVE Digital Technologies Neutral

Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.610151, suggesting that its share price is 161% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HIVE Digital Technologies has a beta of 2.339164, suggesting that its share price is 134% more volatile than the broader market.

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 12.41% compared to HIVE Digital Technologies' net margin of -50.08%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 18.44% beat HIVE Digital Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Computer Modelling Group12.41% 18.44% 12.79%
HIVE Digital Technologies -50.08%-26.37%-8.78%

Computer Modelling Group currently has a consensus price target of C$5.75, suggesting a potential upside of 36.26%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than HIVE Digital Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
HIVE Digital Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Computer Modelling Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than HIVE Digital Technologies. HIVE Digital Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Computer Modelling GroupC$124.40M2.65C$23.95MC$0.1922.21
HIVE Digital TechnologiesC$257.14M4.04-C$13.38M-C$0.77N/A

38.3% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.2% of HIVE Digital Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of HIVE Digital Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats HIVE Digital Technologies on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to Enghouse Systems?

Enghouse Systems (TSE:ENGH) and Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

33.8% of Enghouse Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.3% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by institutional investors. 22.0% of Enghouse Systems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Enghouse Systems has a net margin of 14.75% compared to Computer Modelling Group's net margin of 12.41%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 18.44% beat Enghouse Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Enghouse Systems14.75% 11.70% 7.51%
Computer Modelling Group 12.41%18.44%12.79%

Enghouse Systems has a beta of 0.192967, meaning that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.610151, meaning that its share price is 161% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Computer Modelling Group had 3 more articles in the media than Enghouse Systems. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Computer Modelling Group and 0 mentions for Enghouse Systems. Computer Modelling Group's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Enghouse Systems' score of 0.00 indicating that Computer Modelling Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Enghouse Systems Neutral
Computer Modelling Group Positive

Enghouse Systems pays an annual dividend of C$1.21 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Computer Modelling Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Enghouse Systems pays out 93.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Computer Modelling Group pays out 21.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Enghouse Systems presently has a consensus price target of C$17.80, suggesting a potential upside of 6.27%. Computer Modelling Group has a consensus price target of C$5.75, suggesting a potential upside of 36.26%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than Enghouse Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Enghouse Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Enghouse Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Computer Modelling Group. Enghouse Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Enghouse SystemsC$476.43M1.90C$81.66MC$1.2912.98
Computer Modelling GroupC$124.40M2.65C$23.95MC$0.1922.21

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats Enghouse Systems on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to Docebo?

Docebo (TSE:DCBO) and Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

7.5% of Docebo shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.3% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 43.2% of Docebo shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Docebo has a beta of 0.282773, indicating that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.610151, indicating that its stock price is 161% less volatile than the broader market.

Docebo presently has a consensus price target of C$36.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.14%. Computer Modelling Group has a consensus price target of C$5.75, indicating a potential upside of 36.26%. Given Computer Modelling Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than Docebo.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Docebo
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Computer Modelling Group had 3 more articles in the media than Docebo. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Computer Modelling Group and 0 mentions for Docebo. Docebo's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Computer Modelling Group's score of 1.06 indicating that Docebo is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Docebo Positive
Computer Modelling Group Positive

Docebo has a net margin of 13.23% compared to Computer Modelling Group's net margin of 12.41%. Docebo's return on equity of 114.70% beat Computer Modelling Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Docebo13.23% 114.70% 3.68%
Computer Modelling Group 12.41%18.44%12.79%

Computer Modelling Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Docebo. Computer Modelling Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Docebo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DoceboC$258.93M3.21C$12.71MC$1.1528.95
Computer Modelling GroupC$124.40M2.65C$23.95MC$0.1922.21

Summary

Docebo beats Computer Modelling Group on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to Absolute Software?

Absolute Software (TSE:ABST) and Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Absolute Software pays an annual dividend of C$0.32 per share. Computer Modelling Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Absolute Software pays out -48.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Computer Modelling Group pays out 21.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Absolute Software has a beta of 0.36, indicating that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.610151, indicating that its share price is 161% less volatile than the broader market.

Computer Modelling Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Absolute Software. Absolute Software is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Absolute SoftwareC$222.06M0.00-C$25.79M-C$0.66N/A
Computer Modelling GroupC$124.40M2.65C$23.95MC$0.1922.21

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 12.41% compared to Absolute Software's net margin of -11.61%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 18.44% beat Absolute Software's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Absolute Software-11.61% -966.77% 0.49%
Computer Modelling Group 12.41%18.44%12.79%

82.0% of Absolute Software shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.3% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Absolute Software shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Computer Modelling Group has a consensus target price of C$5.75, indicating a potential upside of 36.26%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than Absolute Software.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Absolute Software
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Computer Modelling Group had 3 more articles in the media than Absolute Software. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Computer Modelling Group and 0 mentions for Absolute Software. Computer Modelling Group's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Absolute Software's score of 0.00 indicating that Computer Modelling Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Absolute Software Neutral
Computer Modelling Group Positive

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats Absolute Software on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to kneat.com?

Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) and kneat.com (TSE:KSI) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 12.41% compared to kneat.com's net margin of -12.69%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 18.44% beat kneat.com's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Computer Modelling Group12.41% 18.44% 12.79%
kneat.com -12.69%-12.95%-9.84%

In the previous week, Computer Modelling Group had 3 more articles in the media than kneat.com. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Computer Modelling Group and 0 mentions for kneat.com. Computer Modelling Group's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat kneat.com's score of 0.00 indicating that Computer Modelling Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Computer Modelling Group Positive
kneat.com Neutral

Computer Modelling Group presently has a consensus price target of C$5.75, suggesting a potential upside of 36.26%. kneat.com has a consensus price target of C$6.30, suggesting a potential downside of 3.08%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than kneat.com.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
kneat.com
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.610151, indicating that its share price is 161% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, kneat.com has a beta of 1.109589, indicating that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Computer Modelling Group has higher revenue and earnings than kneat.com. kneat.com is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Computer Modelling GroupC$124.40M2.65C$23.95MC$0.1922.21
kneat.comC$66.52M9.44-C$8.62M-C$0.08N/A

38.3% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.5% of kneat.com shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 26.0% of kneat.com shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats kneat.com on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Computer Modelling Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CMG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CMG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricComputer Modelling GroupSoftware IndustryTechnology SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$330.69MC$16.16BC$31.49BC$12.59B
Dividend Yield0.94%3.42%2.75%6.34%
P/E Ratio22.21143.8181.2839.33
Price / Sales2.651,281.83584.279.16
Price / Cash8.4045.8250.0782.29
Price / Book4.148.788.104.61
Net IncomeC$23.95MC$431.57MC$702.36MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance3.94%262.07%114.90%-1.15%
1 Month Performance8.76%164.64%73.48%-2.87%
1 Year Performance-32.37%-0.39%167.70%16.48%

Computer Modelling Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CMG
Computer Modelling Group
3.7277 of 5 stars		C$4.22
-0.5%		C$5.75
+36.3%		-31.7%C$330.69MC$124.40M22.21105,000
HIVE
HIVE Digital Technologies
N/AC$4.10
flat		N/A-32.7%C$1.04BC$257.14MN/A20
ENGH
Enghouse Systems
N/AC$16.61
+0.1%		C$17.80
+7.2%		-20.6%C$894.76MC$476.43M12.881,933
DCBO
Docebo
1.9815 of 5 stars		C$32.26
-0.5%		C$36.00
+11.6%		-12.4%C$808.55MC$258.93M28.05966
ABST
Absolute Software
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$807.42MC$222.06MN/A740

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:CMG) was last updated on 10/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's New Dollar
Porter Stansberry says President Trump has signed an executive order initiating what he calls a full U.S. doll...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
The end may be near for these iconic stocks
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, says two forces - AI disruption and fracturing global trade - are ...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel