Top 5 Stocks to Buy Now
→ A drilling crew just broke a record nobody expected (From Behind the Markets) (Ad)tc pixel Free CMG Stock Alerts

Computer Modelling Group (CMG) Competitors

Computer Modelling Group logo
C$3.47 +0.03 (+0.87%)
As of 03:18 PM Eastern
Compare

CMG vs. MTY, MGM, TH, CHH, and MAR

Should you buy Computer Modelling Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Computer Modelling Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Computer Modelling Group include MTY Food Group (MTY), Maple Gold Mines (MGM), Theratechnologies (TH), CENTRIC HEALTH (CHH), and Mount Logan Capital (MAR). These companies are all part of the "restaurants, hotels, motels" industry.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to MTY Food Group?

MTY Food Group (TSE:MTY) and Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends and earnings.

MTY Food Group pays an annual dividend of C$1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Computer Modelling Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. MTY Food Group pays out 20.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Computer Modelling Group pays out 38.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. MTY Food Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

MTY Food Group currently has a consensus target price of C$46.00, indicating a potential upside of 20.67%. Computer Modelling Group has a consensus target price of C$5.75, indicating a potential upside of 65.71%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than MTY Food Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MTY Food Group
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

MTY Food Group has a beta of 1.012246, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.821827, meaning that its stock price is 182% less volatile than the broader market.

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 13.80% compared to MTY Food Group's net margin of 13.14%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 20.50% beat MTY Food Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MTY Food Group13.14% 18.59% 4.18%
Computer Modelling Group 13.80%20.50%12.79%

MTY Food Group has higher revenue and earnings than Computer Modelling Group. MTY Food Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MTY Food GroupC$1.17B0.74C$93.69MC$6.735.66
Computer Modelling GroupC$126.19M2.14C$23.95MC$0.2116.52

27.2% of MTY Food Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.3% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.5% of MTY Food Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, MTY Food Group had 2 more articles in the media than Computer Modelling Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for MTY Food Group and 0 mentions for Computer Modelling Group. MTY Food Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Computer Modelling Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
MTY Food Group Neutral
Computer Modelling Group Neutral

Summary

MTY Food Group and Computer Modelling Group tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to Maple Gold Mines?

Maple Gold Mines (CVE:MGM) and Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and media sentiment.

Computer Modelling Group has higher revenue and earnings than Maple Gold Mines. Maple Gold Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Maple Gold MinesN/AN/A-C$4.83M-C$0.23N/A
Computer Modelling GroupC$126.19M2.14C$23.95MC$0.2116.52

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 13.80% compared to Maple Gold Mines' net margin of 0.00%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 20.50% beat Maple Gold Mines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Maple Gold MinesN/A -105.68% -45.61%
Computer Modelling Group 13.80%20.50%12.79%

Maple Gold Mines has a beta of 2.142858, suggesting that its share price is 114% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.821827, suggesting that its share price is 182% less volatile than the broader market.

10.2% of Maple Gold Mines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.3% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by institutional investors. 21.1% of Maple Gold Mines shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Maple Gold Mines pays an annual dividend of C$0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 18.0%. Computer Modelling Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Maple Gold Mines pays out -208.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Computer Modelling Group pays out 38.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Maple Gold Mines is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Computer Modelling Group has a consensus target price of C$5.75, indicating a potential upside of 65.71%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than Maple Gold Mines.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Maple Gold Mines
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Maple Gold Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Computer Modelling Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Maple Gold Mines Neutral
Computer Modelling Group Neutral

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats Maple Gold Mines on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to Theratechnologies?

Theratechnologies (TSE:TH) and Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Computer Modelling Group has higher revenue and earnings than Theratechnologies. Theratechnologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TheratechnologiesC$84.38M2.44-C$1.96M-C$0.19N/A
Computer Modelling GroupC$126.19M2.14C$23.95MC$0.2116.52

0.5% of Theratechnologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.3% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Theratechnologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Theratechnologies has a beta of 0.256166, indicating that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.821827, indicating that its stock price is 182% less volatile than the broader market.

Computer Modelling Group has a consensus price target of C$5.75, suggesting a potential upside of 65.71%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than Theratechnologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Theratechnologies
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 13.80% compared to Theratechnologies' net margin of -11.81%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 20.50% beat Theratechnologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Theratechnologies-11.81% 16.59% 5.15%
Computer Modelling Group 13.80%20.50%12.79%

In the previous week, Theratechnologies had 1 more articles in the media than Computer Modelling Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Theratechnologies and 0 mentions for Computer Modelling Group. Theratechnologies' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Computer Modelling Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Theratechnologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Theratechnologies Positive
Computer Modelling Group Neutral

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats Theratechnologies on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to CENTRIC HEALTH?

CENTRIC HEALTH (TSE:CHH) and Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Computer Modelling Group has a consensus target price of C$5.75, suggesting a potential upside of 65.71%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than CENTRIC HEALTH.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CENTRIC HEALTH
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

40.3% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Computer Modelling Group has higher revenue and earnings than CENTRIC HEALTH. CENTRIC HEALTH is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CENTRIC HEALTHC$125.52M0.00-C$1.66M-C$0.08N/A
Computer Modelling GroupC$126.19M2.14C$23.95MC$0.2116.52

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 13.80% compared to CENTRIC HEALTH's net margin of 0.00%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 20.50% beat CENTRIC HEALTH's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CENTRIC HEALTHN/A N/A N/A
Computer Modelling Group 13.80%20.50%12.79%

CENTRIC HEALTH pays an annual dividend of C$0.86 per share. Computer Modelling Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. CENTRIC HEALTH pays out -1,075.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Computer Modelling Group pays out 38.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, CENTRIC HEALTH's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Computer Modelling Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CENTRIC HEALTH Neutral
Computer Modelling Group Neutral

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats CENTRIC HEALTH on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to Mount Logan Capital?

Mount Logan Capital (TSE:MAR) and Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Computer Modelling Group has higher revenue and earnings than Mount Logan Capital. Mount Logan Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mount Logan CapitalC$394K0.00-C$442.58K-C$0.03N/A
Computer Modelling GroupC$126.19M2.14C$23.95MC$0.2116.52

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 13.80% compared to Mount Logan Capital's net margin of 0.00%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 20.50% beat Mount Logan Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mount Logan CapitalN/A N/A N/A
Computer Modelling Group 13.80%20.50%12.79%

40.3% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Mount Logan Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Computer Modelling Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mount Logan Capital Neutral
Computer Modelling Group Neutral

Computer Modelling Group has a consensus price target of C$5.75, indicating a potential upside of 65.71%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than Mount Logan Capital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mount Logan Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats Mount Logan Capital on 12 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Computer Modelling Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CMG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CMG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricComputer Modelling GroupSoftware IndustryComputer SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$270.64MC$4.78BC$37.43BC$12.18B
Dividend Yield1.08%4.07%3.30%6.19%
P/E Ratio16.5226.0179.3335.77
Price / Sales2.14247.27618.8810.01
Price / Cash8.4017.4546.3382.29
Price / Book3.474.259.504.42
Net IncomeC$23.95MC$22.26MC$1.07BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-8.92%-0.85%-1.60%-1.16%
1 Month Performance-10.34%8.58%-0.50%-2.35%
1 Year Performance-50.36%-11.34%153.46%36.94%

Computer Modelling Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CMG
Computer Modelling Group
3.5438 of 5 stars		C$3.47
+0.9%		C$5.75
+65.7%		-50.4%C$270.64MC$126.19M16.52105,000
MTY
MTY Food Group
3.9682 of 5 stars		C$40.48
-1.1%		C$46.00
+13.6%		-6.4%C$924.60MC$1.17B6.017,326
MGM
Maple Gold Mines
N/AC$2.99
+0.3%		N/A+231.3%C$214.78MN/AN/A46,000
TH
Theratechnologies
0.3578 of 5 stars		C$4.47
-4.9%		N/A+33.0%C$205.53MC$84.38MN/A103
CHH
CENTRIC HEALTH
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$95.70MC$125.52MN/A1,500

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:CMG) was last updated on 6/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Do NOT Buy SpaceX – Do This Instead
SpaceX just went public - and Whitney Tilson, Harvard MBA and 30-year Wall Street veteran, says buying in coul...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Solar is dead. Here’s what replaces it.
Starting July 4th, every new solar and wind project in America loses its federal tax credits. But one zero-car...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
BlackRock is hoarding it. JPMorgan is hoarding it. Do you own it?
BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Fidelity are reportedly accumulating a scarce blockchain asset - one t...
Awesomely, LLC | Sponsoredtc pixel
Gold Is About to Do Something It Hasn’t in 90 Years
The U.S. Treasury still carries America's gold reserves at $42 per ounce — a price set generations ago. Buried...
US Gold Bureau | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Gold Will Hit $4,900
JPMorgan now sees gold hitting $4,900, and central banks are buying at a record 710 tonnes per quarter. Trump'...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon Musk, Larry Fink & Brian Armstrong are ALL Piling into This
Elon Musk, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, and Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong are all quietly investing in the same te...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Rickards Predicts: Trump to buy tiny $2 stock?
Jim Rickards believes the Trump administration is about to take a direct stake in a $2 stock sitting on the la...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel