Go Pro
→ Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid (From Altimetry) (Ad)tc pixel Free CMG Stock Alerts

Computer Modelling Group (CMG) Competitors

Computer Modelling Group logo
C$3.77 -0.01 (-0.26%)
As of 12:34 PM Eastern
Compare

CMG vs. MTY, TH, MGM, CHH, and MAR

Should you buy Computer Modelling Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Computer Modelling Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Computer Modelling Group include MTY Food Group (MTY), Theratechnologies (TH), Maple Gold Mines (MGM), CENTRIC HEALTH (CHH), and Mount Logan Capital (MAR).

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to MTY Food Group?

MTY Food Group (TSE:MTY) and Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) are related small-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 13.80% compared to MTY Food Group's net margin of 9.78%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 20.50% beat MTY Food Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MTY Food Group9.78% 13.22% 4.18%
Computer Modelling Group 13.80%20.50%12.79%

MTY Food Group has a beta of 0.966946, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.810463, suggesting that its stock price is 181% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, MTY Food Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Computer Modelling Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
MTY Food Group Neutral
Computer Modelling Group Neutral

27.5% of MTY Food Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.6% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.5% of MTY Food Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

MTY Food Group has higher revenue and earnings than Computer Modelling Group. MTY Food Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MTY Food GroupC$1.15B0.67C$93.69MC$4.926.87
Computer Modelling GroupC$126.19M2.33C$23.95MC$0.2117.95

MTY Food Group presently has a consensus target price of C$42.50, indicating a potential upside of 25.78%. Computer Modelling Group has a consensus target price of C$5.75, indicating a potential upside of 52.52%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than MTY Food Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MTY Food Group
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

MTY Food Group pays an annual dividend of C$1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Computer Modelling Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. MTY Food Group pays out 28.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Computer Modelling Group pays out 38.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. MTY Food Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats MTY Food Group on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to Theratechnologies?

Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) and Theratechnologies (TSE:TH) are related small-cap companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk and profitability.

Computer Modelling Group currently has a consensus target price of C$5.75, suggesting a potential upside of 52.52%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than Theratechnologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Theratechnologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.810463, indicating that its stock price is 181% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Theratechnologies has a beta of 0.256166, indicating that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

40.6% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Theratechnologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Theratechnologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Computer Modelling Group has higher revenue and earnings than Theratechnologies. Theratechnologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Computer Modelling GroupC$126.19M2.33C$23.95MC$0.2117.95
TheratechnologiesC$84.38M2.44-C$1.96M-C$0.19N/A

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 13.80% compared to Theratechnologies' net margin of -11.81%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 20.50% beat Theratechnologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Computer Modelling Group13.80% 20.50% 12.79%
Theratechnologies -11.81%16.59%5.15%

In the previous week, Computer Modelling Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Theratechnologies'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Computer Modelling Group Neutral
Theratechnologies Neutral

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats Theratechnologies on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to Maple Gold Mines?

Maple Gold Mines (CVE:MGM) and Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) are related small-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Computer Modelling Group has higher revenue and earnings than Maple Gold Mines. Maple Gold Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Maple Gold MinesN/AN/A-C$4.83M-C$0.23N/A
Computer Modelling GroupC$126.19M2.33C$23.95MC$0.2117.95

Maple Gold Mines pays an annual dividend of C$0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 16.9%. Computer Modelling Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Maple Gold Mines pays out -208.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Computer Modelling Group pays out 38.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Maple Gold Mines is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

10.3% of Maple Gold Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.6% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.1% of Maple Gold Mines shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 13.80% compared to Maple Gold Mines' net margin of 0.00%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 20.50% beat Maple Gold Mines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Maple Gold MinesN/A -105.68% -45.61%
Computer Modelling Group 13.80%20.50%12.79%

In the previous week, Maple Gold Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Computer Modelling Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Maple Gold Mines Neutral
Computer Modelling Group Neutral

Computer Modelling Group has a consensus price target of C$5.75, indicating a potential upside of 52.52%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than Maple Gold Mines.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Maple Gold Mines
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Maple Gold Mines has a beta of 2.258133, suggesting that its stock price is 126% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.810463, suggesting that its stock price is 181% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats Maple Gold Mines on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to CENTRIC HEALTH?

CENTRIC HEALTH (TSE:CHH) and Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) are related small-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

40.6% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Computer Modelling Group has a consensus price target of C$5.75, suggesting a potential upside of 52.52%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than CENTRIC HEALTH.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CENTRIC HEALTH
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, CENTRIC HEALTH's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Computer Modelling Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CENTRIC HEALTH Neutral
Computer Modelling Group Neutral

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 13.80% compared to CENTRIC HEALTH's net margin of 0.00%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 20.50% beat CENTRIC HEALTH's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CENTRIC HEALTHN/A N/A N/A
Computer Modelling Group 13.80%20.50%12.79%

Computer Modelling Group has higher revenue and earnings than CENTRIC HEALTH. CENTRIC HEALTH is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CENTRIC HEALTHC$125.52M0.00-C$1.66M-C$0.08N/A
Computer Modelling GroupC$126.19M2.33C$23.95MC$0.2117.95

CENTRIC HEALTH pays an annual dividend of C$0.86 per share. Computer Modelling Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. CENTRIC HEALTH pays out -1,075.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Computer Modelling Group pays out 38.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats CENTRIC HEALTH on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to Mount Logan Capital?

Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) and Mount Logan Capital (TSE:MAR) are related small-cap companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

40.6% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Computer Modelling Group currently has a consensus target price of C$5.75, indicating a potential upside of 52.52%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than Mount Logan Capital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Mount Logan Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Computer Modelling Group has higher revenue and earnings than Mount Logan Capital. Mount Logan Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Computer Modelling GroupC$126.19M2.33C$23.95MC$0.2117.95
Mount Logan CapitalC$394K0.00-C$442.58K-C$0.03N/A

In the previous week, Computer Modelling Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mount Logan Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Computer Modelling Group Neutral
Mount Logan Capital Neutral

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 13.80% compared to Mount Logan Capital's net margin of 0.00%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 20.50% beat Mount Logan Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Computer Modelling Group13.80% 20.50% 12.79%
Mount Logan Capital N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats Mount Logan Capital on 12 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Computer Modelling Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CMG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CMG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CMG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricComputer Modelling GroupSoftware IndustryTechnology SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$294.04MC$15.40BC$29.57BC$12.50B
Dividend Yield1.02%3.43%2.74%6.20%
P/E Ratio17.95131.8581.4934.28
Price / Sales2.331,298.30598.849.90
Price / Cash8.4045.7150.7682.29
Price / Book3.776.619.174.49
Net IncomeC$23.95MC$438.13MC$663.37MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-1.57%2.81%4.26%2.15%
1 Month Performance1.89%-0.50%-1.54%1.06%
1 Year Performance-51.97%7.16%151.04%33.95%

Computer Modelling Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CMG
Computer Modelling Group
3.8045 of 5 stars		C$3.77
-0.3%		C$5.75
+52.5%		-52.3%C$294.04MC$126.19M17.95105,000
MTY
MTY Food Group
4.5933 of 5 stars		C$33.97
+1.3%		C$42.50
+25.1%		-11.1%C$775.91MC$1.15B6.907,326
TH
Theratechnologies
N/AC$4.47
-4.9%		N/A+2.3%C$205.53MC$84.38MN/A103
MGM
Maple Gold Mines
N/AC$2.52
-5.6%		N/A+265.3%C$181.02MN/AN/A46,000
CHH
CENTRIC HEALTH
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$95.70MC$125.52MN/A1,500

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:CMG) was last updated on 8/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
The dollar reset no one told you about
Porter Stansberry says a dollar reset is underway - one that has happened only once before in America's 250-ye...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
He bet half his $9 billion on ONE stock
One of the most successful fund managers of the past 50 years put more than $4.5 billion - over half his fund ...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ticker Revealed: Pre-IPO Access to "Next Elon Musk" Company
We’ve found The Next Elon Musk… and what we believe to be the next Tesla. It’s already racked up $26 billi...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
White House Insider: “President Trump is Getting Backstabbed!”
A high-level White House insider and lifelong friend of the Trump family recently went on camera with a warnin...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
This under $7 stock could be.
Just one mile from SpaceX's launchpad sits a small company doing something SpaceX can't - and it still trades ...
Freedom Financial | Sponsoredtc pixel
New Dollar Plan Could Drain Your Account (Silently)
Washington's so-called 'Mar-a-Lago Accord' aims to deliberately weaken the U.S. dollar to boost exports and br...
Priority Gold | Sponsoredtc pixel