Computer Modelling Group (CMG) Competitors

C$3.74 +0.03 (+0.81%)

As of 04:00 PM Eastern

CMG vs. MTY, MGM, TH, CHH, and MAR

Should you buy Computer Modelling Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Computer Modelling Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Computer Modelling Group include MTY Food Group (MTY), Maple Gold Mines (MGM), Theratechnologies (TH), CENTRIC HEALTH (CHH), and Mount Logan Capital (MAR). These companies are all part of the "restaurants, hotels, motels" industry.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to MTY Food Group?

MTY Food Group (TSE:MTY) and Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, dividends and earnings.

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 13.54% compared to MTY Food Group's net margin of 13.14%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 19.68% beat MTY Food Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MTY Food Group	13.14%	18.59%	4.18%
Computer Modelling Group	13.54%	19.68%	12.79%

MTY Food Group has a beta of 0.900026, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.6734, meaning that its stock price is 167% less volatile than the broader market.

MTY Food Group pays an annual dividend of C$1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Computer Modelling Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. MTY Food Group pays out 20.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Computer Modelling Group pays out 60.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. MTY Food Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

27.4% of MTY Food Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.5% of MTY Food Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Computer Modelling Group had 2 more articles in the media than MTY Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Computer Modelling Group and 0 mentions for MTY Food Group. Computer Modelling Group's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat MTY Food Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Computer Modelling Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
MTY Food Group	Neutral
Computer Modelling Group	Neutral

MTY Food Group has higher revenue and earnings than Computer Modelling Group. MTY Food Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MTY Food Group	C$1.17B	0.74	C$93.69M	C$6.73	5.65
Computer Modelling Group	C$126.20M	2.36	C$23.95M	C$0.20	18.70

MTY Food Group presently has a consensus price target of C$46.00, indicating a potential upside of 21.05%. Computer Modelling Group has a consensus price target of C$6.05, indicating a potential upside of 61.76%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than MTY Food Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MTY Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29
Computer Modelling Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats MTY Food Group on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to Maple Gold Mines?

Maple Gold Mines (CVE:MGM) and Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, dividends and earnings.

10.4% of Maple Gold Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.1% of Maple Gold Mines shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Computer Modelling Group has higher revenue and earnings than Maple Gold Mines. Maple Gold Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Maple Gold Mines	N/A	N/A	-C$4.83M	-C$0.17	N/A
Computer Modelling Group	C$126.20M	2.36	C$23.95M	C$0.20	18.70

Maple Gold Mines pays an annual dividend of C$0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.9%. Computer Modelling Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Maple Gold Mines pays out -282.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Computer Modelling Group pays out 60.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Maple Gold Mines is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Computer Modelling Group has a consensus price target of C$6.05, indicating a potential upside of 61.76%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than Maple Gold Mines.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Maple Gold Mines	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Computer Modelling Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 13.54% compared to Maple Gold Mines' net margin of 0.00%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 19.68% beat Maple Gold Mines' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Maple Gold Mines	N/A	-107.49%	-45.61%
Computer Modelling Group	13.54%	19.68%	12.79%

Maple Gold Mines has a beta of 2.241883, meaning that its stock price is 124% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.6734, meaning that its stock price is 167% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Computer Modelling Group had 1 more articles in the media than Maple Gold Mines. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Computer Modelling Group and 1 mentions for Maple Gold Mines. Maple Gold Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Computer Modelling Group's score of 0.37 indicating that Maple Gold Mines is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Maple Gold Mines	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Computer Modelling Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats Maple Gold Mines on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to Theratechnologies?

Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) and Theratechnologies (TSE:TH) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and dividends.

In the previous week, Computer Modelling Group had 2 more articles in the media than Theratechnologies. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Computer Modelling Group and 0 mentions for Theratechnologies. Computer Modelling Group's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Theratechnologies' score of 0.00 indicating that Computer Modelling Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Computer Modelling Group	Neutral
Theratechnologies	Neutral

Computer Modelling Group has higher revenue and earnings than Theratechnologies. Theratechnologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Computer Modelling Group	C$126.20M	2.36	C$23.95M	C$0.20	18.70
Theratechnologies	C$84.38M	2.44	-C$1.96M	-C$0.19	N/A

Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.6734, indicating that its share price is 167% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Theratechnologies has a beta of 0.256166, indicating that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

41.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Theratechnologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Theratechnologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 13.54% compared to Theratechnologies' net margin of -19.83%. Theratechnologies' return on equity of 47.31% beat Computer Modelling Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Computer Modelling Group	13.54%	19.68%	12.79%
Theratechnologies	-19.83%	47.31%	5.15%

Computer Modelling Group presently has a consensus price target of C$6.05, indicating a potential upside of 61.76%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than Theratechnologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Computer Modelling Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Theratechnologies	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats Theratechnologies on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to CENTRIC HEALTH?

Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) and CENTRIC HEALTH (TSE:CHH) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Computer Modelling Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. CENTRIC HEALTH pays an annual dividend of C$0.86 per share. Computer Modelling Group pays out 60.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CENTRIC HEALTH pays out -1,075.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 13.54% compared to CENTRIC HEALTH's net margin of 0.00%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 19.68% beat CENTRIC HEALTH's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Computer Modelling Group	13.54%	19.68%	12.79%
CENTRIC HEALTH	N/A	N/A	N/A

Computer Modelling Group presently has a consensus price target of C$6.05, indicating a potential upside of 61.76%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than CENTRIC HEALTH.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Computer Modelling Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
CENTRIC HEALTH	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

41.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Computer Modelling Group has higher revenue and earnings than CENTRIC HEALTH. CENTRIC HEALTH is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Computer Modelling Group	C$126.20M	2.36	C$23.95M	C$0.20	18.70
CENTRIC HEALTH	C$125.52M	0.00	-C$1.66M	-C$0.08	N/A

In the previous week, Computer Modelling Group had 2 more articles in the media than CENTRIC HEALTH. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Computer Modelling Group and 0 mentions for CENTRIC HEALTH. Computer Modelling Group's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat CENTRIC HEALTH's score of 0.00 indicating that Computer Modelling Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Computer Modelling Group	Neutral
CENTRIC HEALTH	Neutral

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats CENTRIC HEALTH on 15 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to Mount Logan Capital?

Mount Logan Capital (TSE:MAR) and Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Computer Modelling Group has higher revenue and earnings than Mount Logan Capital. Mount Logan Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mount Logan Capital	C$394K	0.00	-C$442.58K	-C$0.03	N/A
Computer Modelling Group	C$126.20M	2.36	C$23.95M	C$0.20	18.70

In the previous week, Computer Modelling Group had 2 more articles in the media than Mount Logan Capital. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Computer Modelling Group and 0 mentions for Mount Logan Capital. Computer Modelling Group's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Mount Logan Capital's score of 0.00 indicating that Computer Modelling Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Mount Logan Capital	Neutral
Computer Modelling Group	Neutral

41.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Computer Modelling Group has a consensus price target of C$6.05, indicating a potential upside of 61.76%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than Mount Logan Capital.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mount Logan Capital	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Computer Modelling Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 13.54% compared to Mount Logan Capital's net margin of 0.00%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 19.68% beat Mount Logan Capital's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mount Logan Capital	N/A	N/A	N/A
Computer Modelling Group	13.54%	19.68%	12.79%

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats Mount Logan Capital on 14 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Computer Modelling Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CMG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CMG vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Computer Modelling Group	Software Industry	Computer Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$298.07M	C$4.68B	C$39.48B	C$11.97B
Dividend Yield	1.01%	3.97%	3.20%	6.22%
P/E Ratio	18.70	26.23	163.78	36.97
Price / Sales	2.36	254.54	623.80	12.07
Price / Cash	8.40	17.18	47.82	82.42
Price / Book	3.55	4.19	9.56	4.62
Net Income	C$23.95M	C$22.26M	C$1.03B	C$299.62M
7 Day Performance	-10.31%	-1.93%	0.39%	0.84%
1 Month Performance	-9.44%	2.98%	9.60%	1.26%
1 Year Performance	-55.32%	-8.41%	164.82%	58.29%

Computer Modelling Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CMG Computer Modelling Group	3.2852 of 5 stars	C$3.74 +0.8%	C$6.05 +61.8%	-54.7%	C$298.07M	C$126.20M	18.70	105,000
MTY MTY Food Group	4.3176 of 5 stars	C$40.30 +0.2%	C$46.00 +14.1%	-16.4%	C$918.45M	C$1.17B	5.99	7,326
MGM Maple Gold Mines	N/A	C$3.08 -2.5%	N/A	+330.0%	C$221.43M	N/A	N/A	46,000
TH Theratechnologies	0.0941 of 5 stars	C$4.47 -4.9%	N/A	+22.5%	C$205.53M	C$84.38M	N/A	103	Gap Down
CHH CENTRIC HEALTH	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$95.70M	C$125.52M	N/A	1,500	Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:CMG) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Computer Modelling Group (CMG) Competitors

CMG vs. MTY, MGM, TH, CHH, and MAR

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to MTY Food Group?

Summary

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to Maple Gold Mines?

Summary

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to Theratechnologies?

Summary

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to CENTRIC HEALTH?

Summary

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to Mount Logan Capital?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CMG vs. The Competition

Computer Modelling Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Computer Modelling Group (CMG) Competitors

CMG vs. MTY, MGM, TH, CHH, and MAR

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to MTY Food Group?

Is MTY or CMG more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, MTY or CMG?

Is MTY or CMG a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in MTY or CMG?

Does the media refer more to MTY or CMG?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, MTY or CMG?

Do analysts prefer MTY or CMG?

Summary

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to Maple Gold Mines?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in MGM or CMG?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, MGM or CMG?

Is MGM or CMG a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer MGM or CMG?

Is MGM or CMG more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, MGM or CMG?

Does the media refer more to MGM or CMG?

Summary

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to Theratechnologies?

Does the media prefer CMG or TH?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, CMG or TH?

Which has more risk & volatility, CMG or TH?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in CMG or TH?

Is CMG or TH more profitable?

Do analysts prefer CMG or TH?

Summary

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to CENTRIC HEALTH?

Is CMG or CHH a better dividend stock?

Is CMG or CHH more profitable?

Do analysts rate CMG or CHH?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in CMG or CHH?

Which has better earnings and valuation, CMG or CHH?

Does the media prefer CMG or CHH?

Summary

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to Mount Logan Capital?

Which has better valuation and earnings, MAR or CMG?

Does the media prefer MAR or CMG?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in MAR or CMG?

Do analysts prefer MAR or CMG?

Is MAR or CMG more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CMG vs. The Competition

Computer Modelling Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools