Go Pro
→ It’s not about Greenland (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free CMG Stock Alerts

Computer Modelling Group (CMG) Competitors

Computer Modelling Group logo
C$3.96 +0.02 (+0.51%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern
Compare

CMG vs. HIVE, ENGH, DCBO, ABST, and KSI

Should you buy Computer Modelling Group stock or one of its competitors? Computer Modelling Group's main competitors and comparable companies include HIVE Digital Technologies (HIVE), Enghouse Systems (ENGH), Docebo (DCBO), Absolute Software (ABST), and kneat.com (KSI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "application software" industry.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to HIVE Digital Technologies?

Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) and HIVE Digital Technologies (CVE:HIVE) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, earnings and media sentiment.

Computer Modelling Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than HIVE Digital Technologies. HIVE Digital Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Computer Modelling GroupC$124.40M2.48C$23.95MC$0.1920.84
HIVE Digital TechnologiesC$257.14M4.04-C$13.38M-C$0.77N/A

Computer Modelling Group presently has a consensus target price of C$5.75, indicating a potential upside of 45.20%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than HIVE Digital Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
HIVE Digital Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.810463, meaning that its share price is 181% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HIVE Digital Technologies has a beta of 2.339164, meaning that its share price is 134% more volatile than the broader market.

43.1% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.2% of HIVE Digital Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of HIVE Digital Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 12.41% compared to HIVE Digital Technologies' net margin of -50.08%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 18.44% beat HIVE Digital Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Computer Modelling Group12.41% 18.44% 12.79%
HIVE Digital Technologies -50.08%-26.37%-8.78%

In the previous week, Computer Modelling Group had 3 more articles in the media than HIVE Digital Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Computer Modelling Group and 0 mentions for HIVE Digital Technologies. Computer Modelling Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat HIVE Digital Technologies' score of 0.00 indicating that Computer Modelling Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Computer Modelling Group Positive
HIVE Digital Technologies Neutral

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats HIVE Digital Technologies on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to Enghouse Systems?

Enghouse Systems (TSE:ENGH) and Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and valuation.

Enghouse Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Computer Modelling Group. Enghouse Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Enghouse SystemsC$484.43M1.92C$81.66MC$1.3212.93
Computer Modelling GroupC$124.40M2.48C$23.95MC$0.1920.84

Enghouse Systems pays an annual dividend of C$1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.0%. Computer Modelling Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Enghouse Systems pays out 90.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Computer Modelling Group pays out 21.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Enghouse Systems has a net margin of 14.88% compared to Computer Modelling Group's net margin of 12.41%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 18.44% beat Enghouse Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Enghouse Systems14.88% 11.97% 7.51%
Computer Modelling Group 12.41%18.44%12.79%

Enghouse Systems has a beta of 0.144217, indicating that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.810463, indicating that its stock price is 181% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Computer Modelling Group had 3 more articles in the media than Enghouse Systems. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Computer Modelling Group and 0 mentions for Enghouse Systems. Computer Modelling Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Enghouse Systems' score of 0.00 indicating that Computer Modelling Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Enghouse Systems Neutral
Computer Modelling Group Positive

Enghouse Systems presently has a consensus price target of C$17.60, indicating a potential upside of 3.10%. Computer Modelling Group has a consensus price target of C$5.75, indicating a potential upside of 45.20%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than Enghouse Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Enghouse Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

33.6% of Enghouse Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.1% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.0% of Enghouse Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats Enghouse Systems on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to Docebo?

Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) and Docebo (TSE:DCBO) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Computer Modelling Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Docebo. Computer Modelling Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Docebo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Computer Modelling GroupC$124.40M2.48C$23.95MC$0.1920.84
DoceboC$258.93M3.35C$12.71MC$1.1529.75

Docebo has a net margin of 13.23% compared to Computer Modelling Group's net margin of 12.41%. Docebo's return on equity of 114.70% beat Computer Modelling Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Computer Modelling Group12.41% 18.44% 12.79%
Docebo 13.23%114.70%3.68%

In the previous week, Docebo had 2 more articles in the media than Computer Modelling Group. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Docebo and 3 mentions for Computer Modelling Group. Computer Modelling Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Docebo's score of 0.63 indicating that Computer Modelling Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Computer Modelling Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Docebo
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Computer Modelling Group currently has a consensus price target of C$5.75, indicating a potential upside of 45.20%. Docebo has a consensus price target of C$36.00, indicating a potential upside of 5.23%. Given Computer Modelling Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than Docebo.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Docebo
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

43.1% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.6% of Docebo shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 43.2% of Docebo shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.810463, indicating that its share price is 181% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Docebo has a beta of -0.019669, indicating that its share price is 102% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Docebo beats Computer Modelling Group on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to Absolute Software?

Absolute Software (TSE:ABST) and Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends and media sentiment.

Computer Modelling Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Absolute Software. Absolute Software is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Absolute SoftwareC$222.06M0.00-C$25.79M-C$0.66N/A
Computer Modelling GroupC$124.40M2.48C$23.95MC$0.1920.84

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 12.41% compared to Absolute Software's net margin of -11.61%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 18.44% beat Absolute Software's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Absolute Software-11.61% -966.77% 0.49%
Computer Modelling Group 12.41%18.44%12.79%

In the previous week, Computer Modelling Group had 3 more articles in the media than Absolute Software. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Computer Modelling Group and 0 mentions for Absolute Software. Computer Modelling Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Absolute Software's score of 0.00 indicating that Computer Modelling Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Absolute Software Neutral
Computer Modelling Group Positive

Absolute Software has a beta of 0.36, meaning that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.810463, meaning that its stock price is 181% less volatile than the broader market.

Absolute Software pays an annual dividend of C$0.32 per share. Computer Modelling Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Absolute Software pays out -48.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Computer Modelling Group pays out 21.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Computer Modelling Group has a consensus target price of C$5.75, suggesting a potential upside of 45.20%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than Absolute Software.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Absolute Software
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

82.0% of Absolute Software shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.1% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Absolute Software shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats Absolute Software on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Computer Modelling Group compare to kneat.com?

kneat.com (TSE:KSI) and Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

kneat.com presently has a consensus price target of C$6.30, indicating a potential downside of 3.08%. Computer Modelling Group has a consensus price target of C$5.75, indicating a potential upside of 45.20%. Given Computer Modelling Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than kneat.com.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
kneat.com
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Computer Modelling Group has higher revenue and earnings than kneat.com. kneat.com is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Computer Modelling Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
kneat.comC$66.52M9.44-C$8.62M-C$0.08N/A
Computer Modelling GroupC$124.40M2.48C$23.95MC$0.1920.84

6.5% of kneat.com shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.1% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.0% of kneat.com shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Computer Modelling Group had 3 more articles in the media than kneat.com. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Computer Modelling Group and 0 mentions for kneat.com. Computer Modelling Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat kneat.com's score of 0.00 indicating that Computer Modelling Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
kneat.com Neutral
Computer Modelling Group Positive

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 12.41% compared to kneat.com's net margin of -12.69%. Computer Modelling Group's return on equity of 18.44% beat kneat.com's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
kneat.com-12.69% -12.95% -9.84%
Computer Modelling Group 12.41%18.44%12.79%

kneat.com has a beta of 1.109589, meaning that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.810463, meaning that its stock price is 181% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Computer Modelling Group beats kneat.com on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Computer Modelling Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CMG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CMG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CMG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricComputer Modelling GroupSoftware IndustryTechnology SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$308.86MC$15.68BC$29.15BC$12.61B
Dividend Yield0.99%3.42%2.75%6.22%
P/E Ratio20.84126.8372.1338.83
Price / Sales2.481,303.43595.8410.43
Price / Cash8.4047.0948.3982.29
Price / Book3.887.399.314.82
Net IncomeC$23.95MC$434.52MC$676.02MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance4.21%2.38%0.83%0.65%
1 Month Performance8.49%6.70%4.47%5.48%
1 Year Performance-35.19%5.33%188.44%32.78%

Computer Modelling Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CMG
Computer Modelling Group
3.8077 of 5 stars		C$3.96
+0.5%		C$5.75
+45.2%		-37.0%C$308.86MC$124.40M20.84105,000
HIVE
HIVE Digital Technologies
N/AC$4.10
flat		N/A+12.6%C$1.04BC$257.14MN/A20
ENGH
Enghouse Systems
1.2001 of 5 stars		C$17.14
flat		C$17.60
+2.7%		-24.2%C$931.92MC$484.43M12.981,882
DCBO
Docebo
1.6103 of 5 stars		C$34.30
+0.6%		C$36.00
+5.0%		-19.2%C$870.64MC$258.93M29.83730
ABST
Absolute Software
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$807.42MC$222.06MN/A740

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:CMG) was last updated on 8/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Bezos… DOOMED
A single FCC filing hints Elon Musk is planning his biggest project yet - bigger than Tesla, SpaceX, and X com...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
A $382 trillion migration and the position no one is talking about
Trump just signed a law requiring America's entire $382 trillion financial system to migrate to a new money ne...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your withdrawal order could cost you in taxes
If you have $2M or more saved, the 4% rule points to roughly $92,000 a year - but it's a single-variable answe...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Your Download Link (Expiring) If you still haven't downloaded the free Simple Options Trading For Beginners...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Unleashes "Banned" American Fuel
A newly reopened American mine holds a fuel source so potent that one pound can generate as much energy as 16,...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
Free Stock Pick: The Company First in Line for America’s New Super Fuel
The U.S. Army and Department of Energy are launching Project Janus - a high-priority initiative ordered by Pre...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
The trade I’ve been waiting for since 2011
Ross Givens, Director of Research at Traders Agency, is calling for gold to reach $10,000 an ounce this superc...
Traders Agency | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Most tech companies skip dividends entirely. This one doesn't, paying shareholders like clockwork while flying...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel