Do analysts recommend EFR or NXE?

NexGen Energy has a consensus price target of C$19.88, suggesting a potential upside of 55.15%. Given NexGen Energy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe NexGen Energy is more favorable than Energy Fuels. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Energy Fuels 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 3 Strong Buy rating(s) 4.00 NexGen Energy 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 8 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media prefer EFR or NXE?

In the previous week, Energy Fuels and Energy Fuels both had 1 articles in the media. NexGen Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Energy Fuels' score of -0.27 indicating that NexGen Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Energy Fuels 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral NexGen Energy 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate PDN or EFR?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Paladin Energy 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Energy Fuels 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 3 Strong Buy rating(s) 4.00

Which has higher earnings and valuation, PDN or EFR?

Paladin Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Energy Fuels. Energy Fuels is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Paladin Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Paladin Energy C$304.32M 13.22 C$5.44M C$0.01 739.67 Energy Fuels C$105.76M 36.68 -C$29.68M -C$0.33 N/A

Do analysts rate EFR or DML?

Denison Mines has a consensus target price of C$5.94, suggesting a potential upside of 62.30%. Given Denison Mines' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Denison Mines is more favorable than Energy Fuels. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Energy Fuels 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 3 Strong Buy rating(s) 4.00 Denison Mines 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has better valuation and earnings, EFR or DML?

Denison Mines has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Energy Fuels. Energy Fuels is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Denison Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Energy Fuels C$105.76M 36.68 -C$29.68M -C$0.33 N/A Denison Mines C$4.09M 809.49 -C$27.48M -C$0.31 N/A

Is EFR or DML more profitable?

Energy Fuels has a net margin of -77.30% compared to Denison Mines' net margin of -6,732.67%. Energy Fuels' return on equity of -11.29% beat Denison Mines' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Energy Fuels -77.30% -11.29% -4.04% Denison Mines -6,732.67% -83.49% -5.26%

Does the media prefer EFR or DML?

In the previous week, Denison Mines had 1 more articles in the media than Energy Fuels. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Denison Mines and 1 mentions for Energy Fuels. Denison Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Energy Fuels' score of -0.27 indicating that Denison Mines is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Energy Fuels 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Denison Mines 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate EFR or ISO?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Energy Fuels 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 3 Strong Buy rating(s) 4.00 IsoEnergy 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.50

Does the media refer more to EFR or ISO?

In the previous week, IsoEnergy had 1 more articles in the media than Energy Fuels. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for IsoEnergy and 1 mentions for Energy Fuels. IsoEnergy's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Energy Fuels' score of -0.27 indicating that IsoEnergy is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Energy Fuels 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral IsoEnergy 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate EFR or FCU?

Given Fission Uranium's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fission Uranium is more favorable than Energy Fuels. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Energy Fuels 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 3 Strong Buy rating(s) 4.00 Fission Uranium 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Energy Fuels (EFR) Competitors

C$14.65 -1.32 (-8.27%)

As of 10/7/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

EFR vs. NXE, PDN, DML, ISO, and FCU

Should you buy Energy Fuels stock or one of its competitors? Energy Fuels's main competitors and comparable companies include NexGen Energy (NXE), Paladin Energy (PDN), Denison Mines (DML), IsoEnergy (ISO), and Fission Uranium (FCU). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "coal & consumable fuels" industry.

How does Energy Fuels compare to NexGen Energy?

Energy Fuels (TSE:EFR) and NexGen Energy (TSE:NXE) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, profitability and dividends.

In the previous week, Energy Fuels and Energy Fuels both had 1 articles in the media. NexGen Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Energy Fuels' score of -0.27 indicating that NexGen Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Energy Fuels	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
NexGen Energy	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

NexGen Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Energy Fuels. Energy Fuels is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NexGen Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energy Fuels	C$105.76M	36.68	-C$29.68M	-C$0.33	N/A
NexGen Energy	N/A	N/A	C$148.05M	-C$0.42	N/A

NexGen Energy has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Energy Fuels' net margin of -77.30%. Energy Fuels' return on equity of -11.29% beat NexGen Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energy Fuels	-77.30%	-11.29%	-4.04%
NexGen Energy	N/A	-16.12%	-4.99%

Energy Fuels has a beta of 2.150684, suggesting that its stock price is 115% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NexGen Energy has a beta of 1.758995, suggesting that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the broader market.

57.1% of Energy Fuels shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.3% of NexGen Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Energy Fuels shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of NexGen Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

NexGen Energy has a consensus price target of C$19.88, suggesting a potential upside of 55.15%. Given NexGen Energy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe NexGen Energy is more favorable than Energy Fuels.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energy Fuels	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00
NexGen Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Energy Fuels beats NexGen Energy on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Fuels compare to Paladin Energy?

Paladin Energy (TSE:PDN) and Energy Fuels (TSE:EFR) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Energy Fuels had 1 more articles in the media than Paladin Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Energy Fuels and 0 mentions for Paladin Energy. Paladin Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Energy Fuels' score of -0.27 indicating that Paladin Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Paladin Energy	Positive
Energy Fuels	Neutral

51.6% of Paladin Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.1% of Energy Fuels shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Energy Fuels shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Paladin Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Energy Fuels	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00

Paladin Energy has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Energy Fuels' net margin of -77.30%. Paladin Energy's return on equity of 0.00% beat Energy Fuels' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Paladin Energy	N/A	N/A	N/A
Energy Fuels	-77.30%	-11.29%	-4.04%

Paladin Energy has a beta of -241.148504, suggesting that its stock price is 24,215% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Fuels has a beta of 2.150684, suggesting that its stock price is 115% more volatile than the broader market.

Paladin Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Energy Fuels. Energy Fuels is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Paladin Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Paladin Energy	C$304.32M	13.22	C$5.44M	C$0.01	739.67
Energy Fuels	C$105.76M	36.68	-C$29.68M	-C$0.33	N/A

Summary

Paladin Energy beats Energy Fuels on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Fuels compare to Denison Mines?

Energy Fuels (TSE:EFR) and Denison Mines (TSE:DML) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Energy Fuels has a beta of 2.150684, indicating that its share price is 115% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Denison Mines has a beta of 2.069441, indicating that its share price is 107% more volatile than the broader market.

57.1% of Energy Fuels shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.5% of Denison Mines shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Energy Fuels shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Denison Mines shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Denison Mines has a consensus target price of C$5.94, suggesting a potential upside of 62.30%. Given Denison Mines' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Denison Mines is more favorable than Energy Fuels.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energy Fuels	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00
Denison Mines	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Energy Fuels has a net margin of -77.30% compared to Denison Mines' net margin of -6,732.67%. Energy Fuels' return on equity of -11.29% beat Denison Mines' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energy Fuels	-77.30%	-11.29%	-4.04%
Denison Mines	-6,732.67%	-83.49%	-5.26%

Denison Mines has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Energy Fuels. Energy Fuels is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Denison Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energy Fuels	C$105.76M	36.68	-C$29.68M	-C$0.33	N/A
Denison Mines	C$4.09M	809.49	-C$27.48M	-C$0.31	N/A

In the previous week, Denison Mines had 1 more articles in the media than Energy Fuels. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Denison Mines and 1 mentions for Energy Fuels. Denison Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Energy Fuels' score of -0.27 indicating that Denison Mines is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Energy Fuels	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Denison Mines	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Energy Fuels beats Denison Mines on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Fuels compare to IsoEnergy?

Energy Fuels (TSE:EFR) and IsoEnergy (TSE:ISO) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energy Fuels	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00
IsoEnergy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.50

IsoEnergy has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Energy Fuels' net margin of -77.30%. IsoEnergy's return on equity of 0.00% beat Energy Fuels' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energy Fuels	-77.30%	-11.29%	-4.04%
IsoEnergy	N/A	N/A	N/A

57.1% of Energy Fuels shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.4% of IsoEnergy shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Energy Fuels shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

IsoEnergy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Energy Fuels. IsoEnergy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Fuels, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energy Fuels	C$105.76M	36.68	-C$29.68M	-C$0.33	N/A
IsoEnergy	N/A	N/A	N/A	-C$0.25	N/A

Energy Fuels has a beta of 2.150684, suggesting that its share price is 115% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, IsoEnergy has a beta of 1.976955, suggesting that its share price is 98% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, IsoEnergy had 1 more articles in the media than Energy Fuels. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for IsoEnergy and 1 mentions for Energy Fuels. IsoEnergy's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Energy Fuels' score of -0.27 indicating that IsoEnergy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Energy Fuels	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
IsoEnergy	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Energy Fuels and IsoEnergy tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Fuels compare to Fission Uranium?

Energy Fuels (TSE:EFR) and Fission Uranium (TSE:FCU) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Energy Fuels has a beta of 2.150684, meaning that its stock price is 115% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fission Uranium has a beta of 2.69, meaning that its stock price is 169% more volatile than the broader market.

57.1% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.9% of Fission Uranium shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 11.9% of Fission Uranium shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Fission Uranium has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Energy Fuels' net margin of -77.30%. Fission Uranium's return on equity of -1.69% beat Energy Fuels' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energy Fuels	-77.30%	-11.29%	-4.04%
Fission Uranium	N/A	-1.69%	-2.11%

Given Fission Uranium's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fission Uranium is more favorable than Energy Fuels.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energy Fuels	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00
Fission Uranium	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Energy Fuels had 1 more articles in the media than Fission Uranium. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Energy Fuels and 0 mentions for Fission Uranium. Fission Uranium's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Energy Fuels' score of -0.27 indicating that Fission Uranium is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Energy Fuels	Neutral
Fission Uranium	Neutral

Fission Uranium has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Energy Fuels. Energy Fuels is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fission Uranium, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energy Fuels	C$105.76M	36.68	-C$29.68M	-C$0.33	N/A
Fission Uranium	N/A	N/A	-C$8.11M	-C$0.01	N/A

Summary

Fission Uranium beats Energy Fuels on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Energy Fuels News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding EFR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

EFR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Energy Fuels	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry	Energy Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$3.88B	C$11.33B	C$9.89B	C$12.44B
Dividend Yield	N/A	10.23%	10.71%	6.33%
P/E Ratio	-44.39	17.09	20.12	38.99
Price / Sales	36.68	649.83	531.18	8.95
Price / Cash	14.25	41.29	37.34	82.29
Price / Book	4.58	4.49	4.06	4.43
Net Income	-C$29.68M	C$5.27B	C$4.33B	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-3.81%	0.29%	0.39%	-0.49%
1 Month Performance	-27.37%	-4.06%	-4.03%	-3.41%
1 Year Performance	-41.68%	28.07%	28.79%	13.09%

Energy Fuels Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
EFR Energy Fuels	0.0289 of 5 stars	C$14.65 -8.3%	N/A	-40.0%	C$3.88B	C$105.76M	N/A	179	News Coverage Gap Up
NXE NexGen Energy	2.0191 of 5 stars	C$12.83 +1.6%	C$19.88 +54.9%	+3.2%	C$8.60B	N/A	N/A	142	Gap Down
PDN Paladin Energy	0.3289 of 5 stars	C$9.17 +0.1%	N/A	N/A	C$4.12B	C$304.32M	757.85	549
DML Denison Mines	2.6267 of 5 stars	C$3.68 +1.7%	C$5.94 +61.4%	-8.3%	C$3.33B	C$4.09M	N/A	65	News Coverage Gap Up
ISO IsoEnergy	0.9659 of 5 stars	C$13.09 +3.0%	N/A	-7.8%	C$854.20M	N/A	N/A	24	Positive News Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:EFR) was last updated on 10/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Energy Fuels (EFR) Competitors

EFR vs. NXE, PDN, DML, ISO, and FCU

How does Energy Fuels compare to NexGen Energy?

Summary

How does Energy Fuels compare to Paladin Energy?

Summary

How does Energy Fuels compare to Denison Mines?

Summary

How does Energy Fuels compare to IsoEnergy?

Summary

How does Energy Fuels compare to Fission Uranium?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

EFR vs. The Competition

Energy Fuels Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Energy Fuels (EFR) Competitors

EFR vs. NXE, PDN, DML, ISO, and FCU

How does Energy Fuels compare to NexGen Energy?

Does the media prefer EFR or NXE?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, EFR or NXE?

Is EFR or NXE more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, EFR or NXE?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of EFR or NXE?

Do analysts recommend EFR or NXE?

Summary

How does Energy Fuels compare to Paladin Energy?

Does the media refer more to PDN or EFR?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in PDN or EFR?

Do analysts rate PDN or EFR?

Is PDN or EFR more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, PDN or EFR?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, PDN or EFR?

Summary

How does Energy Fuels compare to Denison Mines?

Which has more volatility and risk, EFR or DML?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in EFR or DML?

Do analysts rate EFR or DML?

Is EFR or DML more profitable?

Which has better valuation and earnings, EFR or DML?

Does the media prefer EFR or DML?

Summary

How does Energy Fuels compare to IsoEnergy?

Do analysts rate EFR or ISO?

Is EFR or ISO more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of EFR or ISO?

Which has better earnings and valuation, EFR or ISO?

Which has more volatility & risk, EFR or ISO?

Does the media refer more to EFR or ISO?

Summary

How does Energy Fuels compare to Fission Uranium?

Which has more volatility and risk, EFR or FCU?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in EFR or FCU?

Is EFR or FCU more profitable?

Do analysts rate EFR or FCU?

Does the media refer more to EFR or FCU?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, EFR or FCU?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

EFR vs. The Competition

Energy Fuels Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools