Go Pro

Energy Fuels (EFR) Competitors

Energy Fuels logo
C$17.77 -0.83 (-4.46%)
As of 07/15/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

EFR vs. BTO, CCA, SPE, PEO, and EFL

Should you buy Energy Fuels stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Energy Fuels with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Energy Fuels include B2Gold (BTO), Cogeco Communications (CCA), Spartan Energy (SPE), People (PEO), and Electrovaya (EFL). These companies are all part of the "financial services" industry.

How does Energy Fuels compare to B2Gold?

Energy Fuels (TSE:EFR) and B2Gold (TSE:BTO) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and risk.

B2Gold has a net margin of 14.78% compared to Energy Fuels' net margin of -82.70%. B2Gold's return on equity of 15.70% beat Energy Fuels' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Energy Fuels-82.70% -10.23% -4.04%
B2Gold 14.78%15.70%6.33%

Energy Fuels has higher earnings, but lower revenue than B2Gold. Energy Fuels is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than B2Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Energy FuelsC$84.86M52.33-C$29.68M-C$0.29N/A
B2GoldC$3.69B1.93-C$563.17MC$0.3814.05

55.0% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.9% of B2Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of B2Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Energy Fuels has a beta of 1.298222, meaning that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, B2Gold has a beta of 1.732526, meaning that its share price is 73% more volatile than the broader market.

B2Gold has a consensus target price of C$8.83, suggesting a potential upside of 65.42%. Given B2Gold's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe B2Gold is more favorable than Energy Fuels.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Energy Fuels
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33
B2Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, B2Gold had 9 more articles in the media than Energy Fuels. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for B2Gold and 2 mentions for Energy Fuels. Energy Fuels' average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat B2Gold's score of 0.50 indicating that Energy Fuels is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Energy Fuels
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
B2Gold
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

B2Gold beats Energy Fuels on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Fuels compare to Cogeco Communications?

Energy Fuels (TSE:EFR) and Cogeco Communications (TSE:CCA) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, media sentiment and dividends.

55.0% of Energy Fuels shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.3% of Cogeco Communications shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Energy Fuels shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Cogeco Communications shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cogeco Communications has a consensus target price of C$74.33, suggesting a potential upside of 15.51%. Given Cogeco Communications' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cogeco Communications is more favorable than Energy Fuels.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Energy Fuels
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33
Cogeco Communications
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

Cogeco Communications has higher revenue and earnings than Energy Fuels. Energy Fuels is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cogeco Communications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Energy FuelsC$84.86M52.33-C$29.68M-C$0.29N/A
Cogeco CommunicationsC$2.84B0.95C$346.48MC$7.448.65

In the previous week, Cogeco Communications had 7 more articles in the media than Energy Fuels. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Cogeco Communications and 2 mentions for Energy Fuels. Energy Fuels' average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Cogeco Communications' score of 0.21 indicating that Energy Fuels is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Energy Fuels
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Cogeco Communications
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Cogeco Communications has a net margin of 11.13% compared to Energy Fuels' net margin of -82.70%. Cogeco Communications' return on equity of 9.93% beat Energy Fuels' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Energy Fuels-82.70% -10.23% -4.04%
Cogeco Communications 11.13%9.93%4.96%

Energy Fuels has a beta of 1.298222, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cogeco Communications has a beta of 0.934571, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Cogeco Communications beats Energy Fuels on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Fuels compare to Spartan Energy?

Energy Fuels (TSE:EFR) and Spartan Energy (TSE:SPE) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Given Spartan Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Spartan Energy is more favorable than Energy Fuels.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Energy Fuels
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33
Spartan Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

55.0% of Energy Fuels shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Energy Fuels shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Energy Fuels had 2 more articles in the media than Spartan Energy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Energy Fuels and 0 mentions for Spartan Energy. Energy Fuels' average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Spartan Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Energy Fuels is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Energy Fuels Positive
Spartan Energy Neutral

Spartan Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Energy Fuels.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Energy FuelsC$84.86M52.33-C$29.68M-C$0.29N/A
Spartan EnergyN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Spartan Energy has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Energy Fuels' net margin of -82.70%. Spartan Energy's return on equity of 0.00% beat Energy Fuels' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Energy Fuels-82.70% -10.23% -4.04%
Spartan Energy N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Energy Fuels beats Spartan Energy on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Fuels compare to People?

People (CVE:PEO) and Energy Fuels (TSE:EFR) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

55.0% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

People has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Energy Fuels' net margin of -82.70%. People's return on equity of 0.00% beat Energy Fuels' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PeopleN/A N/A N/A
Energy Fuels -82.70%-10.23%-4.04%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
People
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Energy Fuels
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33

People has higher revenue and earnings than Energy Fuels. People is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Fuels, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PeopleC$220.77M4.95-C$3.88M-C$0.05N/A
Energy FuelsC$84.86M52.33-C$29.68M-C$0.29N/A

In the previous week, Energy Fuels had 2 more articles in the media than People. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Energy Fuels and 0 mentions for People. Energy Fuels' average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat People's score of 0.00 indicating that Energy Fuels is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
People Neutral
Energy Fuels Positive

Summary

Energy Fuels beats People on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Fuels compare to Electrovaya?

Energy Fuels (TSE:EFR) and Electrovaya (TSE:EFL) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

Energy Fuels has a beta of 1.298222, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Electrovaya has a beta of 1.55, suggesting that its stock price is 55% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Energy Fuels had 2 more articles in the media than Electrovaya. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Energy Fuels and 0 mentions for Electrovaya. Energy Fuels' average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Electrovaya's score of 0.00 indicating that Energy Fuels is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Energy Fuels Positive
Electrovaya Neutral

Electrovaya has a net margin of -10.93% compared to Energy Fuels' net margin of -82.70%. Energy Fuels' return on equity of -10.23% beat Electrovaya's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Energy Fuels-82.70% -10.23% -4.04%
Electrovaya -10.93%-4,709.93%-4.27%

55.0% of Energy Fuels shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of Electrovaya shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Energy Fuels shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 34.6% of Electrovaya shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Electrovaya has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Energy Fuels. Energy Fuels is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Electrovaya, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Energy FuelsC$84.86M52.33-C$29.68M-C$0.29N/A
ElectrovayaC$32.52M0.00-C$3.56M-C$0.03N/A

Given Electrovaya's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Electrovaya is more favorable than Energy Fuels.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Energy Fuels
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33
Electrovaya
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Energy Fuels beats Electrovaya on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Energy Fuels News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for EFR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding EFR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

EFR vs. The Competition

MetricEnergy FuelsUranium IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$4.44BC$4.09BC$10.00BC$12.50B
Dividend YieldN/A3.07%10.69%6.17%
P/E Ratio-61.2821.4519.1836.27
Price / Sales52.333,224.40452.629.55
Price / Cash14.2517.1037.1482.29
Price / Book5.904.094.124.46
Net Income-C$29.68MC$33.15MC$4.25BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-6.82%-3.96%0.83%-0.24%
1 Month Performance-17.46%-9.61%-1.97%-1.20%
1 Year Performance57.54%7.97%30.03%32.21%

Energy Fuels Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
EFR
Energy Fuels
1.605 of 5 stars
C$17.77
-4.5%
N/A+67.3%C$4.44BC$84.86MN/A179
BTO
B2Gold
3.3618 of 5 stars
C$5.33
-0.4%
C$8.83
+65.7%
+12.4%C$7.10BC$3.69B14.032,719
CCA
Cogeco Communications
3.4757 of 5 stars
C$63.50
-0.7%
C$74.33
+17.1%
-9.2%C$2.67BC$2.84B8.534,070
SPE
Spartan Energy
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$1.18BN/AN/A147,000
PEO
People
N/AC$15.21
flat
N/A+0.0%C$1.09BC$220.77MN/A18

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:EFR) was last updated on 7/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners