Energy Fuels (EFR) Competitors

Fission Uranium (TSE:FCU) and Energy Fuels (TSE:EFR) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, community ranking, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, profitability and risk.

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, FCU or EFR?

Energy Fuels has higher revenue and earnings than Fission Uranium. Fission Uranium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Fuels, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fission Uranium	N/A	N/A	-C$8.92M	-C$0.01	-110.00
Energy Fuels	C$37.93M	34.71	C$99.86M	C$0.84	9.58

Does the media favor FCU or EFR?

In the previous week, Fission Uranium had 3 more articles in the media than Energy Fuels. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Fission Uranium and 1 mentions for Energy Fuels. Fission Uranium's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Energy Fuels' score of 0.45 indicating that Energy Fuels is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Fission Uranium	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Energy Fuels	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Which has more risk & volatility, FCU or EFR?

Fission Uranium has a beta of 2.86, indicating that its share price is 186% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Energy Fuels has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its share price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Does the MarketBeat Community believe in FCU or EFR?

Energy Fuels received 3 more outperform votes than Fission Uranium when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 76.56% of users gave Energy Fuels an outperform vote while only 65.42% of users gave Fission Uranium an outperform vote.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
Fission Uranium	Outperform Votes 157 65.42%	Underperform Votes 83 34.58%
Energy Fuels	Outperform Votes 160 76.56%	Underperform Votes 49 23.44%

Do analysts rate FCU or EFR?

Fission Uranium presently has a consensus price target of C$1.75, suggesting a potential upside of 59.09%. Energy Fuels has a consensus price target of C$15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 86.34%. Given Fission Uranium's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Energy Fuels is more favorable than Fission Uranium.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fission Uranium	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Energy Fuels	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Do institutionals & insiders believe in FCU or EFR?

16.7% of Fission Uranium shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.0% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.2% of Fission Uranium shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Is FCU or EFR more profitable?

Energy Fuels has a net margin of 263.29% compared to Energy Fuels' net margin of 0.00%. Fission Uranium's return on equity of 31.99% beat Energy Fuels' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fission Uranium	N/A	-2.10%	-1.80%
Energy Fuels	263.29%	31.99%	-5.99%

Summary

Energy Fuels beats Fission Uranium on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.