Do analysts rate BTO or EFR?

B2Gold currently has a consensus target price of C$9.15, suggesting a potential upside of 61.66%. Given B2Gold's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe B2Gold is more favorable than Energy Fuels. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score B2Gold 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Energy Fuels 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 3 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.50

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, BTO or EFR?

Energy Fuels has lower revenue, but higher earnings than B2Gold. Energy Fuels is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than B2Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio B2Gold C$3.69B 2.04 -C$563.17M C$0.38 14.89 Energy Fuels C$84.86M 60.45 -C$29.68M -C$0.29 N/A

Is BTO or EFR more profitable?

B2Gold has a net margin of 14.78% compared to Energy Fuels' net margin of -82.70%. B2Gold's return on equity of 15.70% beat Energy Fuels' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets B2Gold 14.78% 15.70% 6.33% Energy Fuels -82.70% -10.23% -4.04%

Does the media favor BTO or EFR?

In the previous week, B2Gold and B2Gold both had 2 articles in the media. Energy Fuels' average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat B2Gold's score of -0.04 indicating that Energy Fuels is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment B2Gold 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Energy Fuels 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer EFR or CCA?

Cogeco Communications has a consensus price target of C$75.11, suggesting a potential upside of 17.77%. Given Cogeco Communications' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cogeco Communications is more favorable than Energy Fuels. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Energy Fuels 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 3 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.50 Cogeco Communications 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.71

Does the media refer more to EFR or CCA?

In the previous week, Energy Fuels and Energy Fuels both had 2 articles in the media. Energy Fuels' average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat Cogeco Communications' score of 0.00 indicating that Energy Fuels is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Energy Fuels 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Cogeco Communications 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate EFR or SPE?

Given Spartan Energy's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Spartan Energy is more favorable than Energy Fuels. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Energy Fuels 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 3 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.50 Spartan Energy 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, EFR or SPE?

Spartan Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Energy Fuels. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Energy Fuels C$84.86M 60.45 -C$29.68M -C$0.29 N/A Spartan Energy N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts prefer PEO or EFR?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score People 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Energy Fuels 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 3 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.50

Which has better earnings & valuation, PEO or EFR?

People has higher revenue and earnings than Energy Fuels. People is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Fuels, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio People C$220.77M 4.95 -C$3.88M -C$0.05 N/A Energy Fuels C$84.86M 60.45 -C$29.68M -C$0.29 N/A

Is PEO or EFR more profitable?

People has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Energy Fuels' net margin of -82.70%. People's return on equity of 0.00% beat Energy Fuels' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets People N/A N/A N/A Energy Fuels -82.70% -10.23% -4.04%

Do analysts prefer EFL or EFR?

Given Electrovaya's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Electrovaya is more favorable than Energy Fuels. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Electrovaya 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Energy Fuels 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 3 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.50

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, EFL or EFR?

Electrovaya has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Energy Fuels. Energy Fuels is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Electrovaya, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Electrovaya C$32.52M 0.00 -C$3.56M -C$0.03 N/A Energy Fuels C$84.86M 60.45 -C$29.68M -C$0.29 N/A

Is EFL or EFR more profitable?

Electrovaya has a net margin of -10.93% compared to Energy Fuels' net margin of -82.70%. Energy Fuels' return on equity of -10.23% beat Electrovaya's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Electrovaya -10.93% -4,709.93% -4.27% Energy Fuels -82.70% -10.23% -4.04%

Energy Fuels (EFR) Competitors

C$20.53 -0.85 (-3.98%)

As of 04:18 PM Eastern

Compare

EFR vs. BTO, CCA, SPE, PEO, and EFL

Should you buy Energy Fuels stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Energy Fuels with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Energy Fuels include B2Gold (BTO), Cogeco Communications (CCA), Spartan Energy (SPE), People (PEO), and Electrovaya (EFL). These companies are all part of the "financial services" industry.

How does Energy Fuels compare to B2Gold?

B2Gold (TSE:BTO) and Energy Fuels (TSE:EFR) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

B2Gold currently has a consensus target price of C$9.15, suggesting a potential upside of 61.66%. Given B2Gold's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe B2Gold is more favorable than Energy Fuels.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
B2Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Energy Fuels	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.50

B2Gold has a beta of 1.611419, indicating that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Fuels has a beta of 1.239977, indicating that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

B2Gold has a net margin of 14.78% compared to Energy Fuels' net margin of -82.70%. B2Gold's return on equity of 15.70% beat Energy Fuels' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
B2Gold	14.78%	15.70%	6.33%
Energy Fuels	-82.70%	-10.23%	-4.04%

36.9% of B2Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.2% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of B2Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, B2Gold and B2Gold both had 2 articles in the media. Energy Fuels' average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat B2Gold's score of -0.04 indicating that Energy Fuels is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
B2Gold	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Energy Fuels	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Energy Fuels has lower revenue, but higher earnings than B2Gold. Energy Fuels is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than B2Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
B2Gold	C$3.69B	2.04	-C$563.17M	C$0.38	14.89
Energy Fuels	C$84.86M	60.45	-C$29.68M	-C$0.29	N/A

Summary

B2Gold beats Energy Fuels on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Fuels compare to Cogeco Communications?

Energy Fuels (TSE:EFR) and Cogeco Communications (TSE:CCA) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and institutional ownership.

Energy Fuels has a beta of 1.239977, indicating that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cogeco Communications has a beta of 0.934749, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Cogeco Communications has a net margin of 11.13% compared to Energy Fuels' net margin of -82.70%. Cogeco Communications' return on equity of 9.93% beat Energy Fuels' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energy Fuels	-82.70%	-10.23%	-4.04%
Cogeco Communications	11.13%	9.93%	4.96%

Cogeco Communications has a consensus price target of C$75.11, suggesting a potential upside of 17.77%. Given Cogeco Communications' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cogeco Communications is more favorable than Energy Fuels.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energy Fuels	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.50
Cogeco Communications	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71

In the previous week, Energy Fuels and Energy Fuels both had 2 articles in the media. Energy Fuels' average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat Cogeco Communications' score of 0.00 indicating that Energy Fuels is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Energy Fuels	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Cogeco Communications	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Cogeco Communications has higher revenue and earnings than Energy Fuels. Energy Fuels is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cogeco Communications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energy Fuels	C$84.86M	60.45	-C$29.68M	-C$0.29	N/A
Cogeco Communications	C$2.84B	0.94	C$346.48M	C$7.44	8.57

53.2% of Energy Fuels shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.1% of Cogeco Communications shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Energy Fuels shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Cogeco Communications shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Cogeco Communications beats Energy Fuels on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Fuels compare to Spartan Energy?

Energy Fuels (TSE:EFR) and Spartan Energy (TSE:SPE) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, media sentiment, dividends and valuation.

Spartan Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Energy Fuels.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energy Fuels	C$84.86M	60.45	-C$29.68M	-C$0.29	N/A
Spartan Energy	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Given Spartan Energy's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Spartan Energy is more favorable than Energy Fuels.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energy Fuels	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.50
Spartan Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Spartan Energy has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Energy Fuels' net margin of -82.70%. Spartan Energy's return on equity of 0.00% beat Energy Fuels' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energy Fuels	-82.70%	-10.23%	-4.04%
Spartan Energy	N/A	N/A	N/A

53.2% of Energy Fuels shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Energy Fuels shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Energy Fuels had 2 more articles in the media than Spartan Energy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Energy Fuels and 0 mentions for Spartan Energy. Energy Fuels' average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat Spartan Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Energy Fuels is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Energy Fuels	Neutral
Spartan Energy	Neutral

Summary

Energy Fuels beats Spartan Energy on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Fuels compare to People?

People (CVE:PEO) and Energy Fuels (TSE:EFR) are both financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and profitability.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
People	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Energy Fuels	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.50

People has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Energy Fuels' net margin of -82.70%. People's return on equity of 0.00% beat Energy Fuels' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
People	N/A	N/A	N/A
Energy Fuels	-82.70%	-10.23%	-4.04%

In the previous week, Energy Fuels had 2 more articles in the media than People. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Energy Fuels and 0 mentions for People. Energy Fuels' average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat People's score of 0.00 indicating that Energy Fuels is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
People	Neutral
Energy Fuels	Neutral

People has higher revenue and earnings than Energy Fuels. People is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Fuels, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
People	C$220.77M	4.95	-C$3.88M	-C$0.05	N/A
Energy Fuels	C$84.86M	60.45	-C$29.68M	-C$0.29	N/A

53.2% of Energy Fuels shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Energy Fuels shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Energy Fuels beats People on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Fuels compare to Electrovaya?

Electrovaya (TSE:EFL) and Energy Fuels (TSE:EFR) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability and valuation.

Given Electrovaya's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Electrovaya is more favorable than Energy Fuels.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Electrovaya	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Energy Fuels	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.50

Electrovaya has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Energy Fuels. Energy Fuels is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Electrovaya, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Electrovaya	C$32.52M	0.00	-C$3.56M	-C$0.03	N/A
Energy Fuels	C$84.86M	60.45	-C$29.68M	-C$0.29	N/A

1.1% of Electrovaya shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.2% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by institutional investors. 34.6% of Electrovaya shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Electrovaya has a beta of 1.55, meaning that its stock price is 55% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Fuels has a beta of 1.239977, meaning that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Electrovaya has a net margin of -10.93% compared to Energy Fuels' net margin of -82.70%. Energy Fuels' return on equity of -10.23% beat Electrovaya's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Electrovaya	-10.93%	-4,709.93%	-4.27%
Energy Fuels	-82.70%	-10.23%	-4.04%

In the previous week, Energy Fuels had 2 more articles in the media than Electrovaya. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Energy Fuels and 0 mentions for Electrovaya. Energy Fuels' average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat Electrovaya's score of 0.00 indicating that Energy Fuels is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Electrovaya	Neutral
Energy Fuels	Neutral

Summary

Energy Fuels beats Electrovaya on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Energy Fuels News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding EFR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

EFR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Energy Fuels	Uranium Industry	Energy Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$5.13B	C$4.55B	C$9.82B	C$12.14B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.07%	10.52%	6.19%
P/E Ratio	-70.79	20.61	18.68	35.39
Price / Sales	60.45	3,289.31	748.17	9.95
Price / Cash	14.25	17.10	37.63	82.29
Price / Book	6.82	4.27	4.08	4.39
Net Income	-C$29.68M	C$33.15M	C$4.24B	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-12.23%	-7.67%	-2.27%	-1.92%
1 Month Performance	-19.62%	-9.15%	-8.52%	-3.18%
1 Year Performance	166.97%	21.06%	31.28%	37.72%

Energy Fuels Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
EFR Energy Fuels	0.628 of 5 stars	C$20.53 -4.0%	N/A	+175.9%	C$5.13B	C$84.86M	N/A	179
BTO B2Gold	3.2783 of 5 stars	C$5.72 -4.0%	C$9.15 +60.0%	+12.7%	C$7.62B	C$3.69B	15.05	2,719
CCA Cogeco Communications	3.3943 of 5 stars	C$63.47 +1.2%	C$75.11 +18.3%	-7.2%	C$2.67B	C$2.84B	8.53	4,070
SPE Spartan Energy	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$1.18B	N/A	N/A	147,000	High Trading Volume
PEO People	N/A	C$15.21 flat	N/A	+0.0%	C$1.09B	C$220.77M	N/A	18

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:EFR) was last updated on 6/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Energy Fuels (EFR) Competitors

EFR vs. BTO, CCA, SPE, PEO, and EFL

How does Energy Fuels compare to B2Gold?

Summary

How does Energy Fuels compare to Cogeco Communications?

Summary

How does Energy Fuels compare to Spartan Energy?

Summary

How does Energy Fuels compare to People?

Summary

How does Energy Fuels compare to Electrovaya?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

EFR vs. The Competition

Energy Fuels Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Energy Fuels (EFR) Competitors

EFR vs. BTO, CCA, SPE, PEO, and EFL

How does Energy Fuels compare to B2Gold?

Do analysts rate BTO or EFR?

Which has more volatility & risk, BTO or EFR?

Is BTO or EFR more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of BTO or EFR?

Does the media favor BTO or EFR?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, BTO or EFR?

Summary

How does Energy Fuels compare to Cogeco Communications?

Which has more volatility and risk, EFR or CCA?

Is EFR or CCA more profitable?

Do analysts prefer EFR or CCA?

Does the media refer more to EFR or CCA?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, EFR or CCA?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of EFR or CCA?

Summary

How does Energy Fuels compare to Spartan Energy?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, EFR or SPE?

Do analysts rate EFR or SPE?

Is EFR or SPE more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in EFR or SPE?

Does the media prefer EFR or SPE?

Summary

How does Energy Fuels compare to People?

Do analysts prefer PEO or EFR?

Is PEO or EFR more profitable?

Does the media prefer PEO or EFR?

Which has better earnings & valuation, PEO or EFR?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in PEO or EFR?

Summary

How does Energy Fuels compare to Electrovaya?

Do analysts prefer EFL or EFR?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, EFL or EFR?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in EFL or EFR?

Which has more volatility & risk, EFL or EFR?

Is EFL or EFR more profitable?

Does the media prefer EFL or EFR?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

EFR vs. The Competition

Energy Fuels Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools