Go Pro

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (FAP) Competitors

C$2.66 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 07/31/2026 03:03 PM Eastern

FAP vs. DC.A, XLY, OLY, DF, and PBY.UN

Should you buy abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC include Dundee (DC.A), Auxly Cannabis Group (XLY), Olympia Financial Group (OLY), Dividend 15 Split Corp. II (DF), and Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund (PBY.UN).

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Dundee?

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (TSE:FAP) and Dundee (TSE:DC.A) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

In the previous week, abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Dundee'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC Neutral
Dundee Neutral

Dundee has higher revenue and earnings than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC. Dundee is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCCC$4.77M18.55C$11.23MC$0.0831.70
DundeeC$9.03M33.02C$30.73MC$2.951.13

1.1% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.0% of Dundee shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.2% of Dundee shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dundee has a net margin of 478.33% compared to abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's net margin of 52.12%. Dundee's return on equity of 9.20% beat abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC52.12% 3.04% 2.92%
Dundee 478.33%9.20%-2.18%

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a beta of 0.200632, indicating that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dundee has a beta of 1.448581, indicating that its share price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Dundee beats abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Auxly Cannabis Group?

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (TSE:FAP) and Auxly Cannabis Group (CVE:XLY) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

1.1% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a net margin of 52.12% compared to Auxly Cannabis Group's net margin of 0.00%. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's return on equity of 3.04% beat Auxly Cannabis Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC52.12% 3.04% 2.92%
Auxly Cannabis Group N/A N/A N/A

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Auxly Cannabis Group. Auxly Cannabis Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCCC$4.77M18.55C$11.23MC$0.0831.70
Auxly Cannabis GroupC$35.07M8.27-C$138.26M-C$0.19N/A

In the previous week, Auxly Cannabis Group had 1 more articles in the media than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Auxly Cannabis Group and 0 mentions for abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC. Auxly Cannabis Group's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's score of 0.00 indicating that Auxly Cannabis Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC Neutral
Auxly Cannabis Group Positive

Summary

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC beats Auxly Cannabis Group on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Olympia Financial Group?

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (TSE:FAP) and Olympia Financial Group (TSE:OLY) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a net margin of 52.12% compared to Olympia Financial Group's net margin of 18.44%. Olympia Financial Group's return on equity of 39.27% beat abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC52.12% 3.04% 2.92%
Olympia Financial Group 18.44%39.27%35.88%

Olympia Financial Group has a consensus target price of C$158.24, suggesting a potential upside of 49.65%. Given Olympia Financial Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Olympia Financial Group is more favorable than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Olympia Financial Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Olympia Financial Group has higher revenue and earnings than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC. Olympia Financial Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCCC$4.77M18.55C$11.23MC$0.0831.70
Olympia Financial GroupC$96.01M2.65C$24.45MC$8.3312.69

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a beta of 0.200632, suggesting that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Olympia Financial Group has a beta of 0.00454, suggesting that its share price is 100% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Olympia Financial Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC Neutral
Olympia Financial Group Neutral

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC pays an annual dividend of C$0.21 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.9%. Olympia Financial Group pays an annual dividend of C$7.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC pays out 250.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Olympia Financial Group pays out 86.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

1.1% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of Olympia Financial Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 34.6% of Olympia Financial Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Olympia Financial Group beats abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Dividend 15 Split Corp. II?

Dividend 15 Split Corp. II (TSE:DF) and abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (TSE:FAP) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability and risk.

Dividend 15 Split Corp. II has higher revenue and earnings than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC. Dividend 15 Split Corp. II is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dividend 15 Split Corp. IIC$62.35M3.94C$29.90MC$2.044.63
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCCC$4.77M18.55C$11.23MC$0.0831.70

In the previous week, Dividend 15 Split Corp. II's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Dividend 15 Split Corp. II Neutral
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC Neutral

0.2% of Dividend 15 Split Corp. II shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividend 15 Split Corp. II pays an annual dividend of C$1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.7%. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC pays an annual dividend of C$0.21 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.9%. Dividend 15 Split Corp. II pays out 58.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC pays out 250.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Dividend 15 Split Corp. II is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Dividend 15 Split Corp. II has a beta of 2.634011, indicating that its stock price is 163% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a beta of 0.200632, indicating that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

Dividend 15 Split Corp. II has a net margin of 561.20% compared to abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's net margin of 52.12%. Dividend 15 Split Corp. II's return on equity of 45.07% beat abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Dividend 15 Split Corp. II561.20% 45.07% N/A
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC 52.12%3.04%2.92%

Summary

Dividend 15 Split Corp. II beats abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund?

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (TSE:FAP) and Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund (TSE:PBY.UN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC pays an annual dividend of C$0.21 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.9%. Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund pays an annual dividend of C$0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC pays out 250.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund pays out 67.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

1.1% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 27.2% of Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a beta of 0.200632, suggesting that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund has a beta of 0.103141, suggesting that its share price is 90% less volatile than the broader market.

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a net margin of 52.12% compared to Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund's net margin of 0.00%. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's return on equity of 3.04% beat Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC52.12% 3.04% 2.92%
Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund N/A N/A N/A

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has higher revenue and earnings than Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund. Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCCC$4.77M18.55C$11.23MC$0.0831.70
Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income FundN/AN/AN/AC$0.7421.64

In the previous week, Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund had 1 more articles in the media than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund and 0 mentions for abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC. Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's score of 0.00 indicating that Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Summary

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC beats Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FAP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FAP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FAP vs. The Competition

Metricabrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCCCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$88.57MC$5.48BC$13.93BC$12.25B
Dividend Yield7.99%7.51%5.96%6.20%
P/E Ratio31.7036.8628.7833.59
Price / Sales18.551,120.34464.759.16
Price / Cash6.6048.0429.9582.29
Price / Book0.893.713.714.33
Net IncomeC$11.23MC$417.17MC$1.31BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance0.38%0.57%0.75%-0.53%
1 Month Performance-1.85%-0.69%0.73%-1.72%
1 Year Performance-8.28%6.26%13.69%32.66%

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FAP
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC
N/AC$2.66
flat
N/A-8.3%C$88.57MC$4.77M31.70N/A
DC.A
Dundee
N/AC$3.59
-5.0%
N/A+17.3%C$339.60MC$9.03M1.22N/A
XLY
Auxly Cannabis Group
N/AC$0.39
+5.4%
N/A+0.0%C$289.90MC$35.07MN/AN/A
OLY
Olympia Financial Group
2.6815 of 5 stars
C$105.00
flat
C$158.24
+50.7%
-16.6%C$252.63MC$96.01M12.61325
DF
Dividend 15 Split Corp. II
N/AC$9.60
+1.6%
N/A+51.2%C$245.85MC$62.35M4.7115,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:FAP) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners