abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (FAP) Competitors

C$2.62 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 12:03 PM Eastern

FAP vs. XLY, OLY, PBY.UN, DF, and GDV

Should you buy abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC stock or one of its competitors? abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's main competitors and comparable companies include Auxly Cannabis Group (XLY), Olympia Financial Group (OLY), Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund (PBY.UN), Dividend 15 Split Corp. II (DF), and Global Dividend Growth Split (GDV). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Auxly Cannabis Group?

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (TSE:FAP) and Auxly Cannabis Group (CVE:XLY) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Auxly Cannabis Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC	Neutral
Auxly Cannabis Group	Neutral

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a net margin of 52.12% compared to Auxly Cannabis Group's net margin of 0.00%. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's return on equity of 3.04% beat Auxly Cannabis Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC	52.12%	3.04%	2.92%
Auxly Cannabis Group	N/A	N/A	N/A

1.1% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Auxly Cannabis Group. Auxly Cannabis Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC	C$4.77M	18.27	C$11.23M	C$0.08	31.23
Auxly Cannabis Group	C$35.07M	8.27	-C$138.26M	-C$0.19	N/A

Summary

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC beats Auxly Cannabis Group on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Olympia Financial Group?

Olympia Financial Group (TSE:OLY) and abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (TSE:FAP) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation and earnings.

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a net margin of 52.12% compared to Olympia Financial Group's net margin of 17.31%. Olympia Financial Group's return on equity of 35.11% beat abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Olympia Financial Group	17.31%	35.11%	35.88%
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC	52.12%	3.04%	2.92%

Olympia Financial Group currently has a consensus price target of C$166.48, suggesting a potential upside of 75.24%. Given Olympia Financial Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Olympia Financial Group is more favorable than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Olympia Financial Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

0.9% of Olympia Financial Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are held by institutional investors. 34.6% of Olympia Financial Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Olympia Financial Group has higher revenue and earnings than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC. Olympia Financial Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Olympia Financial Group	C$93.32M	2.45	C$24.45M	C$7.60	12.50
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC	C$4.77M	18.27	C$11.23M	C$0.08	31.23

In the previous week, Olympia Financial Group had 4 more articles in the media than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Olympia Financial Group and 0 mentions for abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC. Olympia Financial Group's average media sentiment score of 0.14 beat abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's score of 0.00 indicating that Olympia Financial Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Olympia Financial Group	Neutral
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC	Neutral

Olympia Financial Group has a beta of -0.004006, meaning that its stock price is 100% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a beta of 0.199791, meaning that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

Olympia Financial Group pays an annual dividend of C$7.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.4%. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC pays an annual dividend of C$0.21 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.0%. Olympia Financial Group pays out 92.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC pays out 250.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Olympia Financial Group beats abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund?

Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund (TSE:PBY.UN) and abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (TSE:FAP) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and profitability.

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has higher revenue and earnings than Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund. Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$0.74	21.73
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC	C$4.77M	18.27	C$11.23M	C$0.08	31.23

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a net margin of 52.12% compared to Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund's net margin of 0.00%. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's return on equity of 3.04% beat Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC	52.12%	3.04%	2.92%

0.0% of Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are held by institutional investors. 27.2% of Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund pays an annual dividend of C$0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC pays an annual dividend of C$0.21 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.0%. Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund pays out 67.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC pays out 250.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund has a beta of 0.103141, suggesting that its stock price is 90% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a beta of 0.199791, suggesting that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund	Neutral
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC	Neutral

Summary

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC beats Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Dividend 15 Split Corp. II?

Dividend 15 Split Corp. II (TSE:DF) and abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (TSE:FAP) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Dividend 15 Split Corp. II's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Dividend 15 Split Corp. II	Neutral
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC	Neutral

0.2% of Dividend 15 Split Corp. II shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividend 15 Split Corp. II pays an annual dividend of C$1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.9%. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC pays an annual dividend of C$0.21 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.0%. Dividend 15 Split Corp. II pays out 30.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC pays out 250.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Dividend 15 Split Corp. II is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Dividend 15 Split Corp. II has higher revenue and earnings than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC. Dividend 15 Split Corp. II is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Dividend 15 Split Corp. II	C$117.20M	1.91	C$29.90M	C$4.00	2.16
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC	C$4.77M	18.27	C$11.23M	C$0.08	31.23

Dividend 15 Split Corp. II has a beta of 2.647672, meaning that its stock price is 165% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a beta of 0.199791, meaning that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

Dividend 15 Split Corp. II has a net margin of 561.20% compared to abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's net margin of 52.12%. Dividend 15 Split Corp. II's return on equity of 45.07% beat abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Dividend 15 Split Corp. II	561.20%	45.07%	N/A
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC	52.12%	3.04%	2.92%

Summary

Dividend 15 Split Corp. II beats abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Global Dividend Growth Split?

Global Dividend Growth Split (TSE:GDV) and abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (TSE:FAP) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation and institutional ownership.

Global Dividend Growth Split has a net margin of 107.90% compared to abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's net margin of 52.12%. Global Dividend Growth Split's return on equity of 27.46% beat abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Global Dividend Growth Split	107.90%	27.46%	N/A
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC	52.12%	3.04%	2.92%

Global Dividend Growth Split has a beta of 1.231726, meaning that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a beta of 0.199791, meaning that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

1.4% of Global Dividend Growth Split shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Global Dividend Growth Split pays an annual dividend of C$1.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.5%. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC pays an annual dividend of C$0.21 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.0%. Global Dividend Growth Split pays out 33.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC pays out 250.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Global Dividend Growth Split is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Global Dividend Growth Split had 1 more articles in the media than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Global Dividend Growth Split and 0 mentions for abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC. Global Dividend Growth Split's average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's score of 0.00 indicating that Global Dividend Growth Split is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Global Dividend Growth Split	Very Positive
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC	Neutral

Global Dividend Growth Split has higher revenue and earnings than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC. Global Dividend Growth Split is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Global Dividend Growth Split	C$67.76M	2.97	C$56.88M	C$3.19	3.53
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC	C$4.77M	18.27	C$11.23M	C$0.08	31.23

Summary

Global Dividend Growth Split beats abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FAP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FAP vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$87.23M	C$5.68B	C$13.97B	C$12.40B
Dividend Yield	8.21%	7.39%	5.88%	6.23%
P/E Ratio	31.23	32.70	26.71	39.57
Price / Sales	18.27	1,210.64	512.37	10.01
Price / Cash	6.60	48.15	30.40	82.29
Price / Book	0.88	3.75	2.84	4.72
Net Income	C$11.23M	C$417.39M	C$1.31B	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-0.38%	0.61%	0.05%	-0.94%
1 Month Performance	-1.50%	2.18%	2.31%	4.62%
1 Year Performance	-9.97%	5.81%	10.54%	29.05%

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FAP abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC	N/A	C$2.62 flat	N/A	-10.0%	C$87.23M	C$4.77M	31.23	N/A
XLY Auxly Cannabis Group	N/A	C$0.39 +5.4%	N/A	+0.0%	C$289.90M	C$35.07M	N/A	N/A	Gap Up
OLY Olympia Financial Group	3.2905 of 5 stars	C$98.52 -1.5%	C$166.48 +69.0%	-25.1%	C$240.63M	C$93.32M	12.96	325
PBY.UN Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund	N/A	C$16.08 flat	N/A	+1.5%	C$232.39M	N/A	21.73	N/A
DF Dividend 15 Split Corp. II	N/A	C$8.78 +0.1%	N/A	+34.7%	C$228.42M	C$117.20M	2.20	15,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:FAP) was last updated on 8/31/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (FAP) Competitors

FAP vs. XLY, OLY, PBY.UN, DF, and GDV

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Auxly Cannabis Group?

Summary

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Olympia Financial Group?

Summary

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund?

Summary

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Dividend 15 Split Corp. II?

Summary

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Global Dividend Growth Split?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FAP vs. The Competition

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (FAP) Competitors

FAP vs. XLY, OLY, PBY.UN, DF, and GDV

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Auxly Cannabis Group?

Does the media prefer FAP or XLY?

Is FAP or XLY more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in FAP or XLY?

Which has better earnings and valuation, FAP or XLY?

Summary

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Olympia Financial Group?

Is OLY or FAP more profitable?

Do analysts prefer OLY or FAP?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in OLY or FAP?

Which has better earnings and valuation, OLY or FAP?

Does the media favor OLY or FAP?

Which has more risk and volatility, OLY or FAP?

Is OLY or FAP a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, PBY.UN or FAP?

Is PBY.UN or FAP more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of PBY.UN or FAP?

Is PBY.UN or FAP a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, PBY.UN or FAP?

Does the media favor PBY.UN or FAP?

Summary

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Dividend 15 Split Corp. II?

Does the media favor DF or FAP?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in DF or FAP?

Is DF or FAP a better dividend stock?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, DF or FAP?

Which has more risk and volatility, DF or FAP?

Is DF or FAP more profitable?

Summary

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Global Dividend Growth Split?

Is GDV or FAP more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, GDV or FAP?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in GDV or FAP?

Is GDV or FAP a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer GDV or FAP?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, GDV or FAP?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FAP vs. The Competition

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools