Go Pro

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (FAP) Competitors

C$2.64 -0.01 (-0.38%)
As of 01:10 PM Eastern

FAP vs. DC.A, XLY, OLY, DF, and PBY.UN

Should you buy abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC stock or one of its competitors? abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's main competitors and comparable companies include Dundee (DC.A), Auxly Cannabis Group (XLY), Olympia Financial Group (OLY), Dividend 15 Split Corp. II (DF), and Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund (PBY.UN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Dundee?

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (TSE:FAP) and Dundee (TSE:DC.A) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and profitability.

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a beta of 0.199791, suggesting that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dundee has a beta of 1.451897, suggesting that its share price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

1.1% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.3% of Dundee shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.2% of Dundee shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dundee has higher revenue and earnings than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC. Dundee is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCCC$4.77M18.41C$11.23MC$0.0831.47
DundeeC$10.08M37.07C$30.73MC$2.421.72

Dundee has a net margin of 478.33% compared to abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's net margin of 52.12%. Dundee's return on equity of 9.20% beat abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC52.12% 3.04% 2.92%
Dundee 478.33%9.20%-2.18%

In the previous week, Dundee had 2 more articles in the media than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Dundee and 0 mentions for abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC. Dundee's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's score of 0.00 indicating that Dundee is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC Neutral
Dundee Positive

Summary

Dundee beats abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Auxly Cannabis Group?

Auxly Cannabis Group (CVE:XLY) and abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (TSE:FAP) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, profitability and dividends.

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a net margin of 52.12% compared to Auxly Cannabis Group's net margin of 0.00%. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's return on equity of 3.04% beat Auxly Cannabis Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Auxly Cannabis GroupN/A N/A N/A
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC 52.12%3.04%2.92%

1.1% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Auxly Cannabis Group. Auxly Cannabis Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Auxly Cannabis GroupC$35.07M8.27-C$138.26M-C$0.19N/A
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCCC$4.77M18.41C$11.23MC$0.0831.47

In the previous week, Auxly Cannabis Group had 1 more articles in the media than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Auxly Cannabis Group and 0 mentions for abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC. Auxly Cannabis Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Auxly Cannabis Group Neutral
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC Neutral

Summary

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC beats Auxly Cannabis Group on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Olympia Financial Group?

Olympia Financial Group (TSE:OLY) and abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (TSE:FAP) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Olympia Financial Group has a beta of -0.004006, suggesting that its stock price is 100% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a beta of 0.199791, suggesting that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a net margin of 52.12% compared to Olympia Financial Group's net margin of 17.31%. Olympia Financial Group's return on equity of 35.11% beat abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Olympia Financial Group17.31% 35.11% 35.88%
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC 52.12%3.04%2.92%

0.9% of Olympia Financial Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are owned by institutional investors. 34.6% of Olympia Financial Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Olympia Financial Group pays an annual dividend of C$7.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.7%. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC pays an annual dividend of C$0.21 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.0%. Olympia Financial Group pays out 92.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC pays out 250.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Olympia Financial Group has higher revenue and earnings than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC. Olympia Financial Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Olympia Financial GroupC$93.32M2.68C$24.45MC$7.6013.67
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCCC$4.77M18.41C$11.23MC$0.0831.47

In the previous week, Olympia Financial Group had 1 more articles in the media than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Olympia Financial Group and 0 mentions for abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC. Olympia Financial Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Olympia Financial Group Neutral
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC Neutral

Olympia Financial Group currently has a consensus price target of C$158.24, suggesting a potential upside of 52.33%. Given Olympia Financial Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Olympia Financial Group is more favorable than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Olympia Financial Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Olympia Financial Group beats abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Dividend 15 Split Corp. II?

Dividend 15 Split Corp. II (TSE:DF) and abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (TSE:FAP) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation and dividends.

Dividend 15 Split Corp. II has a net margin of 561.20% compared to abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's net margin of 52.12%. Dividend 15 Split Corp. II's return on equity of 45.07% beat abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Dividend 15 Split Corp. II561.20% 45.07% N/A
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC 52.12%3.04%2.92%

Dividend 15 Split Corp. II has higher revenue and earnings than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC. Dividend 15 Split Corp. II is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dividend 15 Split Corp. IIC$117.20M2.04C$29.90MC$4.002.30
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCCC$4.77M18.41C$11.23MC$0.0831.47

Dividend 15 Split Corp. II has a beta of 2.647672, suggesting that its stock price is 165% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a beta of 0.199791, suggesting that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Dividend 15 Split Corp. II's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Dividend 15 Split Corp. II Neutral
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC Neutral

Dividend 15 Split Corp. II pays an annual dividend of C$1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.0%. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC pays an annual dividend of C$0.21 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.0%. Dividend 15 Split Corp. II pays out 30.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC pays out 250.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Dividend 15 Split Corp. II is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

0.2% of Dividend 15 Split Corp. II shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Dividend 15 Split Corp. II beats abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund?

Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund (TSE:PBY.UN) and abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (TSE:FAP) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund pays an annual dividend of C$0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC pays an annual dividend of C$0.21 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.0%. Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund pays out 67.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC pays out 250.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund has a beta of 0.103141, indicating that its stock price is 90% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a beta of 0.199791, indicating that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC'saverage media sentiment score.

0.0% of Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are held by institutional investors. 27.2% of Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a net margin of 52.12% compared to Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund's net margin of 0.00%. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's return on equity of 3.04% beat Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income FundN/A N/A N/A
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC 52.12%3.04%2.92%

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has higher revenue and earnings than Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund. Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income FundN/AN/AN/AC$0.7421.73
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCCC$4.77M18.41C$11.23MC$0.0831.47

Summary

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC beats Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FAP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FAP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FAP vs. The Competition

Metricabrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCCCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$87.90MC$5.66BC$14.06BC$12.54B
Dividend Yield8.08%7.39%5.87%6.20%
P/E Ratio31.4738.2929.3535.98
Price / Sales18.411,223.12512.4610.08
Price / Cash6.6048.2830.4282.29
Price / Book0.883.752.854.75
Net IncomeC$11.23MC$417.12MC$1.31BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-0.75%0.50%0.77%0.85%
1 Month Performance-1.49%1.46%1.71%5.14%
1 Year Performance-9.90%6.55%11.96%35.88%

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FAP
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC
N/AC$2.64
-0.4%
N/A-9.6%C$87.90MC$4.77M31.47N/A
DC.A
Dundee
N/AC$3.84
+5.8%
N/A+21.3%C$344.99MC$9.03M1.30N/A
XLY
Auxly Cannabis Group
N/AC$0.39
+5.4%
N/A+0.0%C$289.90MC$35.07MN/AN/A
OLY
Olympia Financial Group
2.4596 of 5 stars
C$103.25
+0.2%
C$158.24
+53.3%
-22.3%C$248.42MC$96.01M12.39325
DF
Dividend 15 Split Corp. II
N/AC$9.38
-0.8%
N/A+45.3%C$244.03MC$117.20M4.6015,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:FAP) was last updated on 8/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners