Free Trial

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (FAP) Competitors

C$2.65 +0.01 (+0.38%)
As of 05/8/2026 03:19 PM Eastern

FAP vs. OLY, XLY, AIM, PBY.UN, and GDV

Should you be buying abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC include Olympia Financial Group (OLY), Auxly Cannabis Group (XLY), Aimia (AIM), Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund (PBY.UN), and Global Dividend Growth Split (GDV). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Olympia Financial Group?

Olympia Financial Group (TSE:OLY) and abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (TSE:FAP) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

Olympia Financial Group currently has a consensus price target of C$167.49, suggesting a potential upside of 37.61%. Given Olympia Financial Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Olympia Financial Group is more favorable than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Olympia Financial Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Olympia Financial Group pays an annual dividend of C$7.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC pays an annual dividend of C$0.21 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.9%. Olympia Financial Group pays out 87.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC pays out 135.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

0.9% of Olympia Financial Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are held by institutional investors. 34.6% of Olympia Financial Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Olympia Financial Group has higher revenue and earnings than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC. Olympia Financial Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Olympia Financial GroupC$98.10M2.99C$24.45MC$8.2514.75
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCCC$7.08M12.45C$11.23MC$0.1617.10

Olympia Financial Group has a beta of 0.324322, suggesting that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a beta of 0.204207, suggesting that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Olympia Financial Group had 1 more articles in the media than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Olympia Financial Group and 0 mentions for abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC. Olympia Financial Group's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's score of 0.00 indicating that Olympia Financial Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Olympia Financial Group Positive
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC Neutral

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a net margin of 63.36% compared to Olympia Financial Group's net margin of 20.20%. Olympia Financial Group's return on equity of 45.15% beat abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Olympia Financial Group20.20% 45.15% 35.88%
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC 63.36%5.14%2.92%

Summary

Olympia Financial Group beats abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Auxly Cannabis Group?

Auxly Cannabis Group (CVE:XLY) and abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (TSE:FAP) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, Auxly Cannabis Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Auxly Cannabis Group Neutral
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC Neutral

1.1% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a net margin of 63.36% compared to Auxly Cannabis Group's net margin of 0.00%. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's return on equity of 5.14% beat Auxly Cannabis Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Auxly Cannabis GroupN/A N/A N/A
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC 63.36%5.14%2.92%

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Auxly Cannabis Group. Auxly Cannabis Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Auxly Cannabis GroupC$35.07M8.27-C$138.26M-C$0.19N/A
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCCC$7.08M12.45C$11.23MC$0.1617.10

Summary

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC beats Auxly Cannabis Group on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Aimia?

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (TSE:FAP) and Aimia (TSE:AIM) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Aimia has a consensus price target of C$3.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.52%. Given Aimia's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Aimia is more favorable than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Aimia
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Aimia's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's score of 0.00 indicating that Aimia is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC Neutral
Aimia Positive

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a beta of 0.204207, meaning that its share price is 80% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Aimia has a beta of 0.027707, meaning that its share price is 97% less volatile than the S&P 500.

1.1% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.3% of Aimia shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Aimia shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a net margin of 63.36% compared to Aimia's net margin of -3.21%. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's return on equity of 5.14% beat Aimia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC63.36% 5.14% 2.92%
Aimia -3.21%-4.81%-4.93%

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aimia. Aimia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCCC$7.08M12.45C$11.23MC$0.1617.10
AimiaC$483.40M0.50-C$78.81MC$0.387.08

Summary

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC and Aimia tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund?

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (TSE:FAP) and Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund (TSE:PBY.UN) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a net margin of 63.36% compared to Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund's net margin of 0.00%. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's return on equity of 5.14% beat Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC63.36% 5.14% 2.92%
Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund N/A N/A N/A

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC pays an annual dividend of C$0.21 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.9%. Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund pays an annual dividend of C$0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC pays out 135.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund pays out 67.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

1.1% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 27.2% of Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a beta of 0.204207, meaning that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund has a beta of 0.103141, meaning that its stock price is 90% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund'saverage media sentiment score.

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has higher revenue and earnings than Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCCC$7.08M12.45C$11.23MC$0.1617.10
Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income FundN/AN/AN/AC$0.7422.62

Summary

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC beats Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC compare to Global Dividend Growth Split?

Global Dividend Growth Split (TSE:GDV) and abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (TSE:FAP) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, earnings and risk.

Global Dividend Growth Split pays an annual dividend of C$1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.7%. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC pays an annual dividend of C$0.21 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.9%. Global Dividend Growth Split pays out 41.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC pays out 135.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Global Dividend Growth Split is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Global Dividend Growth Split has higher revenue and earnings than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC. Global Dividend Growth Split is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Global Dividend Growth SplitC$54.75M4.01C$56.88MC$2.884.80
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCCC$7.08M12.45C$11.23MC$0.1617.10

Global Dividend Growth Split has a net margin of 110.31% compared to abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's net margin of 63.36%. Global Dividend Growth Split's return on equity of 23.73% beat abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Global Dividend Growth Split110.31% 23.73% N/A
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC 63.36%5.14%2.92%

Global Dividend Growth Split has a beta of 1.125034, indicating that its share price is 13% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a beta of 0.204207, indicating that its share price is 80% less volatile than the S&P 500.

0.9% of Global Dividend Growth Split shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Global Dividend Growth Split's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Global Dividend Growth Split Neutral
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC Neutral

Summary

Global Dividend Growth Split beats abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FAP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FAP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FAP vs. The Competition

Metricabrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCCAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$87.90MC$2.38BC$5.70BC$11.86B
Dividend Yield7.95%5.99%5.26%6.23%
P/E Ratio17.1025.3515.9325.18
Price / Sales12.452,084.941,324.4212.37
Price / Cash6.6060.1888.5782.42
Price / Book0.831.364.414.60
Net IncomeC$11.23MC$265.53MC$1.15BC$299.62M
7 Day Performance-0.38%0.70%0.50%1.50%
1 Month Performance-0.75%3.61%2.65%3.25%
1 Year Performance-9.25%14.79%22.93%57.14%

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FAP
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC
N/AC$2.65
+0.4%
N/AN/AC$87.90MC$7.08M17.10N/A
OLY
Olympia Financial Group
3.242 of 5 stars
C$122.50
0.0%
C$167.49
+36.7%
N/AC$294.74MC$98.10M14.85325
XLY
Auxly Cannabis Group
N/AC$0.39
+5.4%
N/AN/AC$289.90MC$35.07MN/AN/A
AIM
Aimia
3.0827 of 5 stars
C$2.71
-0.4%
C$3.00
+10.7%
N/AC$241.45MC$483.40M7.1320
PBY.UN
Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund
N/AC$16.20
-0.6%
N/AN/AC$234.12MN/A21.89N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:FAP) was last updated on 5/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners