Go Pro

Genesis Land Development (GDC) Competitors

C$3.38 +0.03 (+0.90%)
As of 07/3/2026 10:38 AM Eastern

GDC vs. AKG, WTER, SEB, OMI, and COR

Should you buy Genesis Land Development stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Genesis Land Development with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Genesis Land Development include Asanko Gold (AKG), Alkaline Water (WTER), Smart Employee Benefits (SEB), Orosur Mining (OMI), and Camino Minerals (COR). These companies are all part of the "wholesale" industry.

How does Genesis Land Development compare to Asanko Gold?

Genesis Land Development (TSE:GDC) and Asanko Gold (TSE:AKG) are both small-cap wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

9.1% of Genesis Land Development shares are owned by institutional investors. 75.4% of Genesis Land Development shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Genesis Land Development's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Asanko Gold'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Genesis Land Development Neutral
Asanko Gold Neutral

Genesis Land Development has a net margin of 9.09% compared to Asanko Gold's net margin of 0.00%. Genesis Land Development's return on equity of 11.83% beat Asanko Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Genesis Land Development9.09% 11.83% 4.71%
Asanko Gold N/A N/A N/A

Genesis Land Development has higher revenue and earnings than Asanko Gold. Asanko Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genesis Land Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Genesis Land DevelopmentC$374.40M0.51C$34.71MC$0.595.73
Asanko GoldN/AN/AN/A-C$0.74N/A

Summary

Genesis Land Development beats Asanko Gold on 8 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Genesis Land Development compare to Alkaline Water?

Genesis Land Development (TSE:GDC) and Alkaline Water (CVE:WTER) are both small-cap wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability and earnings.

In the previous week, Alkaline Water had 1 more articles in the media than Genesis Land Development. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Alkaline Water and 0 mentions for Genesis Land Development. Alkaline Water's average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Genesis Land Development's score of 0.00 indicating that Alkaline Water is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Genesis Land Development Neutral
Alkaline Water Neutral

Genesis Land Development has higher revenue and earnings than Alkaline Water. Alkaline Water is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genesis Land Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Genesis Land DevelopmentC$374.40M0.51C$34.71MC$0.595.73
Alkaline WaterC$37.04M2.04-C$19.94M-C$0.34N/A

Genesis Land Development has a net margin of 9.09% compared to Alkaline Water's net margin of 0.00%. Genesis Land Development's return on equity of 11.83% beat Alkaline Water's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Genesis Land Development9.09% 11.83% 4.71%
Alkaline Water N/A N/A N/A

9.1% of Genesis Land Development shares are owned by institutional investors. 75.4% of Genesis Land Development shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Genesis Land Development beats Alkaline Water on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Genesis Land Development compare to Smart Employee Benefits?

Genesis Land Development (TSE:GDC) and Smart Employee Benefits (CVE:SEB) are both small-cap wholesale companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings and risk.

Genesis Land Development has higher revenue and earnings than Smart Employee Benefits. Smart Employee Benefits is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genesis Land Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Genesis Land DevelopmentC$374.40M0.51C$34.71MC$0.595.73
Smart Employee BenefitsC$64.58M0.81-C$8.56M-C$0.05N/A

Genesis Land Development has a beta of 0.417133, indicating that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Smart Employee Benefits has a beta of 1.66, indicating that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Smart Employee Benefits' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Genesis Land Development's score of 0.00 indicating that Smart Employee Benefits is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Genesis Land Development Neutral
Smart Employee Benefits Positive

9.1% of Genesis Land Development shares are owned by institutional investors. 75.4% of Genesis Land Development shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.6% of Smart Employee Benefits shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Genesis Land Development has a net margin of 9.09% compared to Smart Employee Benefits' net margin of -13.26%. Genesis Land Development's return on equity of 11.83% beat Smart Employee Benefits' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Genesis Land Development9.09% 11.83% 4.71%
Smart Employee Benefits -13.26%N/A -4.75%

Summary

Genesis Land Development beats Smart Employee Benefits on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Genesis Land Development compare to Orosur Mining?

Genesis Land Development (TSE:GDC) and Orosur Mining (TSE:OMI) are both small-cap wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation and earnings.

9.1% of Genesis Land Development shares are owned by institutional investors. 75.4% of Genesis Land Development shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Genesis Land Development has a net margin of 9.09% compared to Orosur Mining's net margin of 0.00%. Genesis Land Development's return on equity of 11.83% beat Orosur Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Genesis Land Development9.09% 11.83% 4.71%
Orosur Mining N/A N/A N/A

Genesis Land Development has higher revenue and earnings than Orosur Mining. Orosur Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genesis Land Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Genesis Land DevelopmentC$374.40M0.51C$34.71MC$0.595.73
Orosur MiningC$11.77M0.00-C$2.83M-C$0.02N/A

In the previous week, Genesis Land Development's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Orosur Mining'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Genesis Land Development Neutral
Orosur Mining Neutral

Summary

Genesis Land Development beats Orosur Mining on 9 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Genesis Land Development compare to Camino Minerals?

Genesis Land Development (TSE:GDC) and Camino Minerals (CVE:COR) are both small-cap wholesale companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings and media sentiment.

Genesis Land Development has a net margin of 9.09% compared to Camino Minerals' net margin of 0.00%. Genesis Land Development's return on equity of 11.83% beat Camino Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Genesis Land Development9.09% 11.83% 4.71%
Camino Minerals N/A -63.47%-33.72%

Genesis Land Development has higher revenue and earnings than Camino Minerals. Genesis Land Development is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Camino Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Genesis Land DevelopmentC$374.40M0.51C$34.71MC$0.595.73
Camino MineralsN/AN/A-C$3.46MC$0.0224.50

Genesis Land Development has a beta of 0.417133, suggesting that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Camino Minerals has a beta of 1.705858, suggesting that its share price is 71% more volatile than the broader market.

9.1% of Genesis Land Development shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Camino Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 75.4% of Genesis Land Development shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Camino Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Genesis Land Development's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Camino Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Genesis Land Development Neutral
Camino Minerals Neutral

Summary

Genesis Land Development beats Camino Minerals on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Genesis Land Development News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GDC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GDC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GDC vs. The Competition

MetricGenesis Land DevelopmentReal Estate IndustryReal Estate SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$188.55MC$3.11BC$2.11BC$13.07B
Dividend Yield5.91%3.51%7.21%6.18%
P/E Ratio5.733.8330.1936.51
Price / Sales0.51139.90413.7610.34
Price / Cash6.2692.6068.3882.29
Price / Book0.590.661.384.52
Net IncomeC$34.71M-C$122.40M-C$125.49MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance1.81%0.50%0.51%1.85%
1 Month Performance-2.03%0.00%0.76%1.71%
1 Year Performance6.96%-4.42%-1.22%36.40%

Genesis Land Development Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GDC
Genesis Land Development
N/AC$3.38
+0.9%
N/A+7.0%C$188.55MC$374.40M5.7360
AKG
Asanko Gold
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$353.31MN/AN/A2,280
WTER
Alkaline Water
N/AC$1.28
-0.8%
N/A+0.0%C$75.50MC$37.04MN/A40
SEB
Smart Employee Benefits
N/AC$0.30
+1.7%
N/A+0.0%C$52.63MC$64.58MN/A13,000
OMI
Orosur Mining
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$47.11MC$11.77MN/A22,500

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:GDC) was last updated on 7/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners