Global Atomic (GLO) Competitors

Energy Fuels (TSE:EFR) and Global Atomic (TSE:GLO) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, community ranking, valuation and profitability.

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of EFR or GLO?

51.9% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.4% of Global Atomic shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.2% of Global Atomic shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Do analysts recommend EFR or GLO?

Global Atomic has a consensus target price of C$1.88, suggesting a potential upside of 110.67%. Given Global Atomic's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Global Atomic is more favorable than Energy Fuels.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energy Fuels	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00
Global Atomic	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Does the media prefer EFR or GLO?

In the previous week, Global Atomic had 5 more articles in the media than Energy Fuels. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Global Atomic and 2 mentions for Energy Fuels. Energy Fuels' average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Global Atomic's score of -0.39 indicating that Energy Fuels is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Energy Fuels	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Global Atomic	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Does the MarketBeat Community believe in EFR or GLO?

Energy Fuels received 160 more outperform votes than Global Atomic when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 76.30% of users gave Energy Fuels an outperform vote while only 16.67% of users gave Global Atomic an outperform vote.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
Energy Fuels	Outperform Votes 161 76.30%	Underperform Votes 50 23.70%
Global Atomic	Outperform Votes 1 16.67%	Underperform Votes 5 83.33%

Which has more volatility & risk, EFR or GLO?

Energy Fuels has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Global Atomic has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, EFR or GLO?

Global Atomic has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Energy Fuels. Global Atomic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Fuels, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energy Fuels	C$32.84M	26.45	-C$29.68M	-C$0.30	-20.72
Global Atomic	C$1.10M	257.88	-C$10.53M	-C$0.03	-27.96

Is EFR or GLO more profitable?

Energy Fuels has a net margin of -90.40% compared to Global Atomic's net margin of -955.83%. Global Atomic's return on equity of -4.19% beat Energy Fuels' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energy Fuels	-90.40%	-9.25%	-4.04%
Global Atomic	-955.83%	-4.19%	-2.79%

Summary

Energy Fuels beats Global Atomic on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.