Gold Springs Resource (GRC) Competitors

Gold Springs Resource logo
C$0.08 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 06/17/2026

GRC vs. WPRT, CMI, KMT, KDA, and SXI

Should you buy Gold Springs Resource stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Gold Springs Resource with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Gold Springs Resource include Westport Fuel Systems (WPRT), C-Com Satellite Systems (CMI), Brunswick Exploration Inc. (KMT.V) (KMT), KDA Group (KDA), and Synex Renewable Energy (SXI). These companies are all part of the "machinery" industry.

How does Gold Springs Resource compare to Westport Fuel Systems?

Gold Springs Resource (TSE:GRC) and Westport Fuel Systems (TSE:WPRT) are both small-cap machinery companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Gold Springs Resource has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Westport Fuel Systems' net margin of -344.16%. Gold Springs Resource's return on equity of -2.85% beat Westport Fuel Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gold Springs ResourceN/A -2.85% -1.59%
Westport Fuel Systems -344.16%-78.42%-6.52%

In the previous week, Westport Fuel Systems had 2 more articles in the media than Gold Springs Resource. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Westport Fuel Systems and 0 mentions for Gold Springs Resource. Westport Fuel Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.49 beat Gold Springs Resource's score of 0.00 indicating that Westport Fuel Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gold Springs Resource Neutral
Westport Fuel Systems Neutral

Gold Springs Resource has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Westport Fuel Systems.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gold Springs ResourceN/AN/A-C$1.14MN/AN/A
Westport Fuel SystemsC$18.28M3.08-C$17.30M-C$3.75N/A

4.2% of Gold Springs Resource shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.9% of Westport Fuel Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.3% of Gold Springs Resource shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.2% of Westport Fuel Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gold Springs Resource has a beta of -0.264713, meaning that its stock price is 126% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Westport Fuel Systems has a beta of 2.394099, meaning that its stock price is 139% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Gold Springs Resource beats Westport Fuel Systems on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gold Springs Resource compare to C-Com Satellite Systems?

Gold Springs Resource (TSE:GRC) and C-Com Satellite Systems (CVE:CMI) are both small-cap machinery companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends and risk.

4.2% of Gold Springs Resource shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of C-Com Satellite Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 16.3% of Gold Springs Resource shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 41.4% of C-Com Satellite Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

C-Com Satellite Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Gold Springs Resource.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gold Springs ResourceN/AN/A-C$1.14MN/AN/A
C-Com Satellite SystemsC$5.78M6.87C$2.02MN/AN/A

Gold Springs Resource has a net margin of 0.00% compared to C-Com Satellite Systems' net margin of -7.05%. C-Com Satellite Systems' return on equity of -1.76% beat Gold Springs Resource's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gold Springs ResourceN/A -2.85% -1.59%
C-Com Satellite Systems -7.05%-1.76%5.23%

In the previous week, C-Com Satellite Systems had 1 more articles in the media than Gold Springs Resource. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for C-Com Satellite Systems and 0 mentions for Gold Springs Resource. Gold Springs Resource's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled C-Com Satellite Systems'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gold Springs Resource Neutral
C-Com Satellite Systems Neutral

Gold Springs Resource has a beta of -0.264713, indicating that its share price is 126% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, C-Com Satellite Systems has a beta of 0.57901, indicating that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

C-Com Satellite Systems beats Gold Springs Resource on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gold Springs Resource compare to Brunswick Exploration Inc. (KMT.V)?

Brunswick Exploration Inc. (KMT.V) (CVE:KMT) and Gold Springs Resource (TSE:GRC) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, risk, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

4.2% of Gold Springs Resource shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.3% of Gold Springs Resource shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brunswick Exploration Inc. (KMT.V)N/AN/AN/A-C$0.05N/A
Gold Springs ResourceN/AN/A-C$1.14MN/AN/A

Brunswick Exploration Inc. (KMT.V)'s return on equity of 0.00% beat Gold Springs Resource's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brunswick Exploration Inc. (KMT.V)N/A N/A N/A
Gold Springs Resource N/A -2.85%-1.59%

In the previous week, Brunswick Exploration Inc. (KMT.V)'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Gold Springs Resource'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Brunswick Exploration Inc. (KMT.V) Neutral
Gold Springs Resource Neutral

Summary

Brunswick Exploration Inc. (KMT.V) beats Gold Springs Resource on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gold Springs Resource compare to KDA Group?

KDA Group (CVE:KDA) and Gold Springs Resource (TSE:GRC) are both small-cap machinery companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

KDA Group has a net margin of 5,414.15% compared to Gold Springs Resource's net margin of 0.00%. Gold Springs Resource's return on equity of -2.85% beat KDA Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
KDA Group5,414.15% -15.93% -11.56%
Gold Springs Resource N/A -2.85%-1.59%

In the previous week, KDA Group had 1 more articles in the media than Gold Springs Resource. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for KDA Group and 0 mentions for Gold Springs Resource. KDA Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Gold Springs Resource'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
KDA Group Neutral
Gold Springs Resource Neutral

Gold Springs Resource has lower revenue, but higher earnings than KDA Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
KDA GroupC$317.01K50.48-C$1.73M-C$0.04N/A
Gold Springs ResourceN/AN/A-C$1.14MN/AN/A

4.2% of Gold Springs Resource shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.5% of KDA Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.3% of Gold Springs Resource shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

KDA Group has a beta of -0.394297, suggesting that its share price is 139% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gold Springs Resource has a beta of -0.264713, suggesting that its share price is 126% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

KDA Group and Gold Springs Resource tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gold Springs Resource compare to Synex Renewable Energy?

Synex Renewable Energy (TSE:SXI) and Gold Springs Resource (TSE:GRC) are both small-cap machinery companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

In the previous week, Synex Renewable Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Gold Springs Resource. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Synex Renewable Energy and 0 mentions for Gold Springs Resource. Synex Renewable Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Gold Springs Resource's score of 0.00 indicating that Synex Renewable Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Synex Renewable Energy Positive
Gold Springs Resource Neutral

Gold Springs Resource has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Synex Renewable Energy's net margin of -2.34%. Synex Renewable Energy's return on equity of -1.47% beat Gold Springs Resource's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Synex Renewable Energy-2.34% -1.47% -2.05%
Gold Springs Resource N/A -2.85%-1.59%

4.2% of Gold Springs Resource shares are held by institutional investors. 65.4% of Synex Renewable Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.3% of Gold Springs Resource shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Synex Renewable Energy has a beta of 0.29, suggesting that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gold Springs Resource has a beta of -0.264713, suggesting that its stock price is 126% less volatile than the broader market.

Synex Renewable Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Gold Springs Resource.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Synex Renewable EnergyC$2.94M4.07-C$880.62K-C$0.18N/A
Gold Springs ResourceN/AN/A-C$1.14MN/AN/A

Summary

Synex Renewable Energy beats Gold Springs Resource on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gold Springs Resource News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GRC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GRC vs. The Competition

MetricGold Springs ResourceGold IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$22.64MC$5.00BC$4.77BC$12.19B
Dividend Yield0.72%5.60%4.99%6.19%
P/E Ratio-9.0036.8123.4335.95
Price / SalesN/A205.546,003.0310.66
Price / Cash62.5022.1126.9782.29
Price / Book0.8911.879.234.50
Net Income-C$1.14MC$6.39MC$156.93MC$299.09M
7 Day PerformanceN/A1.16%0.31%0.09%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-3.09%-1.89%0.21%
1 Year PerformanceN/A60.09%57.40%41.89%

Gold Springs Resource Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GRC
Gold Springs Resource
N/AC$0.08
flat
N/AN/AC$22.64MN/AN/A1,150
WPRT
Westport Fuel Systems
N/AC$2.60
+2.4%
N/A-21.9%C$45.23MC$18.28MN/A1,715
CMI
C-Com Satellite Systems
N/AC$0.97
-4.9%
N/A-9.6%C$43.10MC$5.78MN/A73,600
KMT
Brunswick Exploration Inc. (KMT.V)
N/AC$0.20
+17.6%
N/A+0.0%C$18.96MN/AN/A8,730
KDA
KDA Group
N/AC$0.08
flat
N/A-70.4%C$16.00MC$317.01KN/A3,100

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:GRC) was last updated on 6/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners