Free Trial
The Market Does Not Wait. MarketBeat All Access for Just $149
Get the Deal
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Greenlane Renewables (GRN) Competitors

Greenlane Renewables logo
C$0.22 +0.01 (+2.33%)
As of 10:46 AM Eastern

GRN vs. FCF, PNP, RM, PWM, and DB

Should you buy Greenlane Renewables stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Greenlane Renewables with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Greenlane Renewables include Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V) (FCF), Pinetree Capital (PNP), Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V) (RM), Power Metals (PWM), and Decibel Cannabis (DB). These companies are all part of the "banking" industry.

How does Greenlane Renewables compare to Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V)?

Greenlane Renewables (TSE:GRN) and Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V) (CVE:FCF) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Greenlane Renewables had 2 more articles in the media than Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V). MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Greenlane Renewables and 0 mentions for Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V). Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V)'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Greenlane Renewables' score of -0.07 indicating that Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V) is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Greenlane Renewables Neutral
Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V) Neutral

3.3% of Greenlane Renewables shares are held by institutional investors. 9.1% of Greenlane Renewables shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V) has higher revenue and earnings than Greenlane Renewables. Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greenlane Renewables, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greenlane RenewablesC$44.43M0.79-C$21.61M-C$0.01N/A
Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V)C$81.50M1.47-C$761.66K-C$0.02N/A

Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V) has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Greenlane Renewables' net margin of -4.32%. Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V)'s return on equity of 0.00% beat Greenlane Renewables' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Greenlane Renewables-4.32% -8.55% -9.89%
Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V) N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V) beats Greenlane Renewables on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greenlane Renewables compare to Pinetree Capital?

Greenlane Renewables (TSE:GRN) and Pinetree Capital (TSE:PNP) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

Greenlane Renewables has a net margin of -4.32% compared to Pinetree Capital's net margin of -355.44%. Greenlane Renewables' return on equity of -8.55% beat Pinetree Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Greenlane Renewables-4.32% -8.55% -9.89%
Pinetree Capital -355.44%-23.88%17.18%

3.3% of Greenlane Renewables shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.9% of Pinetree Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.1% of Greenlane Renewables shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 43.4% of Pinetree Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pinetree Capital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Greenlane Renewables. Greenlane Renewables is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pinetree Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greenlane RenewablesC$44.43M0.79-C$21.61M-C$0.01N/A
Pinetree CapitalC$3.45M23.11C$18.94M-C$2.11N/A

In the previous week, Greenlane Renewables and Greenlane Renewables both had 2 articles in the media. Pinetree Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Greenlane Renewables' score of -0.07 indicating that Pinetree Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Greenlane Renewables Neutral
Pinetree Capital Positive

Greenlane Renewables has a beta of 3.89175, indicating that its share price is 289% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pinetree Capital has a beta of 0.893707, indicating that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pinetree Capital beats Greenlane Renewables on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greenlane Renewables compare to Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V)?

Greenlane Renewables (TSE:GRN) and Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V) (CVE:RM) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, Greenlane Renewables had 2 more articles in the media than Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V). MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Greenlane Renewables and 0 mentions for Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V). Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V)'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Greenlane Renewables' score of -0.07 indicating that Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V) is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Greenlane Renewables Neutral
Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V) Neutral

Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V) has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Greenlane Renewables. Greenlane Renewables is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greenlane RenewablesC$44.43M0.79-C$21.61M-C$0.01N/A
Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V)-C$20.54K-4,102.27C$5.58MC$0.0615.09

3.3% of Greenlane Renewables shares are held by institutional investors. 9.1% of Greenlane Renewables shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V) has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Greenlane Renewables' net margin of -4.32%. Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V)'s return on equity of 0.00% beat Greenlane Renewables' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Greenlane Renewables-4.32% -8.55% -9.89%
Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V) N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V) beats Greenlane Renewables on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greenlane Renewables compare to Power Metals?

Power Metals (CVE:PWM) and Greenlane Renewables (TSE:GRN) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

0.2% of Power Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.3% of Greenlane Renewables shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of Power Metals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.1% of Greenlane Renewables shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Power Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Greenlane Renewables' net margin of -4.32%. Greenlane Renewables' return on equity of -8.55% beat Power Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Power MetalsN/A -14.36% -16.97%
Greenlane Renewables -4.32%-8.55%-9.89%

Power Metals has a beta of 0.469895, suggesting that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greenlane Renewables has a beta of 3.89175, suggesting that its stock price is 289% more volatile than the broader market.

Power Metals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Greenlane Renewables. Power Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greenlane Renewables, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Power MetalsN/AN/A-C$845.76K-C$0.01N/A
Greenlane RenewablesC$44.43M0.79-C$21.61M-C$0.01N/A

In the previous week, Greenlane Renewables had 2 more articles in the media than Power Metals. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Greenlane Renewables and 0 mentions for Power Metals. Power Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Greenlane Renewables' score of -0.07 indicating that Power Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Power Metals Neutral
Greenlane Renewables Neutral

Summary

Greenlane Renewables beats Power Metals on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greenlane Renewables compare to Decibel Cannabis?

Decibel Cannabis (CVE:DB) and Greenlane Renewables (TSE:GRN) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

Decibel Cannabis has a net margin of -3.78% compared to Greenlane Renewables' net margin of -4.32%. Decibel Cannabis' return on equity of -1.05% beat Greenlane Renewables' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Decibel Cannabis-3.78% -1.05% 3.04%
Greenlane Renewables -4.32%-8.55%-9.89%

0.7% of Decibel Cannabis shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.3% of Greenlane Renewables shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Decibel Cannabis shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.1% of Greenlane Renewables shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Decibel Cannabis has higher revenue and earnings than Greenlane Renewables. Greenlane Renewables is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Decibel Cannabis, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Decibel CannabisC$112.72M0.64-C$1.03M-C$0.01N/A
Greenlane RenewablesC$44.43M0.79-C$21.61M-C$0.01N/A

In the previous week, Greenlane Renewables had 2 more articles in the media than Decibel Cannabis. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Greenlane Renewables and 0 mentions for Decibel Cannabis. Decibel Cannabis' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Greenlane Renewables' score of -0.07 indicating that Decibel Cannabis is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Decibel Cannabis Neutral
Greenlane Renewables Neutral

Decibel Cannabis currently has a consensus target price of C$0.10, suggesting a potential downside of 20.00%. Given Decibel Cannabis' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Decibel Cannabis is more favorable than Greenlane Renewables.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Decibel Cannabis
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Greenlane Renewables
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Decibel Cannabis has a beta of 0.067304, suggesting that its stock price is 93% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greenlane Renewables has a beta of 3.89175, suggesting that its stock price is 289% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Decibel Cannabis beats Greenlane Renewables on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Greenlane Renewables News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GRN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GRN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GRN vs. The Competition

MetricGreenlane RenewablesPollution & Treatment Controls IndustryIndustrials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$35.11MC$591.12MC$9.15BC$11.85B
Dividend YieldN/A19.52%3.58%6.23%
P/E Ratio-22.007.0424.9836.28
Price / Sales0.7968.284,315.8211.25
Price / Cash3.6118.2627.4082.42
Price / Book1.613.374.774.31
Net Income-C$21.61MC$38.62MC$794.33MC$299.62M
7 Day Performance-16.98%0.63%-1.48%-2.02%
1 Month Performance-2.22%13.07%0.00%-0.81%
1 Year PerformanceN/A37.36%32.67%52.75%

Greenlane Renewables Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GRN
Greenlane Renewables
N/AC$0.22
+2.3%
N/A+152.9%C$35.11MC$44.43MN/A146
FCF
Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V)
N/AC$3.15
flat
N/A+0.0%C$119.96MC$81.50MN/A1,400
PNP
Pinetree Capital
N/AC$9.00
-1.1%
N/A-54.4%C$85.42MC$3.45MN/A61,500
RM
Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V)
N/AC$0.83
+1.2%
N/A+0.0%C$84.26M-C$20.54K15.091,990
PWM
Power Metals
N/AC$0.45
+1.1%
N/A-42.6%C$77.66MN/AN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:GRN) was last updated on 5/19/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners