Go Pro

Greenlane Renewables (GRN) Competitors

Greenlane Renewables logo
C$0.20 -0.01 (-2.44%)
As of 08/31/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

GRN vs. XBC, NXH, ENW, REK, and TLA

Should you buy Greenlane Renewables stock or one of its competitors? Greenlane Renewables's main competitors and comparable companies include Xebec Adsorption (XBC), Next Hydrogen Solutions (NXH), EnWave (ENW), Reko International Group (REK), and Titan Logix (TLA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery & supplies & components" industry.

How does Greenlane Renewables compare to Xebec Adsorption?

Greenlane Renewables (TSE:GRN) and Xebec Adsorption (TSE:XBC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

3.3% of Greenlane Renewables shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.1% of Greenlane Renewables shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Xebec Adsorption has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Greenlane Renewables' net margin of -10.01%. Xebec Adsorption's return on equity of 0.00% beat Greenlane Renewables' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Greenlane Renewables-10.01% -18.95% -9.89%
Xebec Adsorption N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Greenlane Renewables' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Xebec Adsorption'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Greenlane Renewables Neutral
Xebec Adsorption Neutral

Greenlane Renewables has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Xebec Adsorption. Greenlane Renewables is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xebec Adsorption, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greenlane RenewablesC$43.21M0.74-C$21.61M-C$0.03N/A
Xebec AdsorptionC$155.36M0.00-C$31.87M-C$0.21N/A

Summary

Xebec Adsorption beats Greenlane Renewables on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greenlane Renewables compare to Next Hydrogen Solutions?

Greenlane Renewables (TSE:GRN) and Next Hydrogen Solutions (CVE:NXH) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and risk.

Greenlane Renewables has a net margin of -10.01% compared to Next Hydrogen Solutions' net margin of -188.19%. Greenlane Renewables' return on equity of -18.95% beat Next Hydrogen Solutions' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Greenlane Renewables-10.01% -18.95% -9.89%
Next Hydrogen Solutions -188.19%-138.91%-33.96%

In the previous week, Next Hydrogen Solutions had 2 more articles in the media than Greenlane Renewables. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Next Hydrogen Solutions and 0 mentions for Greenlane Renewables. Greenlane Renewables' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Next Hydrogen Solutions'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Greenlane Renewables Neutral
Next Hydrogen Solutions Neutral

Greenlane Renewables has a beta of 3.756282, meaning that its share price is 276% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Next Hydrogen Solutions has a beta of -3.591413, meaning that its share price is 459% less volatile than the broader market.

Next Hydrogen Solutions has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Greenlane Renewables. Greenlane Renewables is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Next Hydrogen Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greenlane RenewablesC$43.21M0.74-C$21.61M-C$0.03N/A
Next Hydrogen SolutionsC$3.99M8.68-C$11.21M-C$0.13N/A

3.3% of Greenlane Renewables shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.6% of Next Hydrogen Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.1% of Greenlane Renewables shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 18.5% of Next Hydrogen Solutions shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Greenlane Renewables beats Next Hydrogen Solutions on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greenlane Renewables compare to EnWave?

Greenlane Renewables (TSE:GRN) and EnWave (CVE:ENW) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Greenlane Renewables has a beta of 3.756282, suggesting that its share price is 276% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EnWave has a beta of 1.774028, suggesting that its share price is 77% more volatile than the broader market.

EnWave has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Greenlane Renewables. EnWave is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greenlane Renewables, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greenlane RenewablesC$43.21M0.74-C$21.61M-C$0.03N/A
EnWaveC$12.29M2.41-C$2.40M-C$0.01N/A

3.3% of Greenlane Renewables shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of EnWave shares are held by institutional investors. 9.1% of Greenlane Renewables shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of EnWave shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, EnWave had 1 more articles in the media than Greenlane Renewables. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for EnWave and 0 mentions for Greenlane Renewables. EnWave's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Greenlane Renewables' score of 0.00 indicating that EnWave is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Greenlane Renewables Neutral
EnWave Positive

Greenlane Renewables has a net margin of -10.01% compared to EnWave's net margin of -14.59%. EnWave's return on equity of -16.94% beat Greenlane Renewables' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Greenlane Renewables-10.01% -18.95% -9.89%
EnWave -14.59%-16.94%-16.70%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Greenlane Renewables
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
EnWave
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

EnWave beats Greenlane Renewables on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greenlane Renewables compare to Reko International Group?

Reko International Group (CVE:REK) and Greenlane Renewables (TSE:GRN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Reko International Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Greenlane Renewables' net margin of -10.01%. Reko International Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Greenlane Renewables' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Reko International GroupN/A N/A N/A
Greenlane Renewables -10.01%-18.95%-9.89%

Reko International Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Greenlane Renewables.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Reko International GroupN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Greenlane RenewablesC$43.21M0.74-C$21.61M-C$0.03N/A

3.3% of Greenlane Renewables shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.1% of Greenlane Renewables shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Reko International Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Greenlane Renewables'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Reko International Group Neutral
Greenlane Renewables Neutral

Summary

Reko International Group and Greenlane Renewables tied by winning 3 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greenlane Renewables compare to Titan Logix?

Titan Logix (CVE:TLA) and Greenlane Renewables (TSE:GRN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

Greenlane Renewables has a net margin of -10.01% compared to Titan Logix's net margin of -14.30%. Titan Logix's return on equity of -5.66% beat Greenlane Renewables' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Titan Logix-14.30% -5.66% -2.32%
Greenlane Renewables -10.01%-18.95%-9.89%

Titan Logix has a beta of 0.972941, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greenlane Renewables has a beta of 3.756282, meaning that its share price is 276% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Titan Logix's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Greenlane Renewables'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Titan Logix Neutral
Greenlane Renewables Neutral

Titan Logix has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Greenlane Renewables. Titan Logix is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greenlane Renewables, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Titan LogixC$6.24M2.19C$1.23M-C$0.04N/A
Greenlane RenewablesC$43.21M0.74-C$21.61M-C$0.03N/A

0.2% of Titan Logix shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.3% of Greenlane Renewables shares are owned by institutional investors. 38.1% of Titan Logix shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.1% of Greenlane Renewables shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Greenlane Renewables beats Titan Logix on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Greenlane Renewables News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GRN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GRN vs. The Competition

MetricGreenlane RenewablesMachinery IndustryIndustrials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$32.76MC$11.44BC$10.57BC$12.47B
Dividend YieldN/A2.26%97.25%6.24%
P/E Ratio-6.6720.5726.2539.55
Price / Sales0.7463.74370.5110.10
Price / Cash3.6123.0424.2182.29
Price / Book1.524.374.994.73
Net Income-C$21.61MC$357.78MC$610.96MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-9.09%-0.62%-1.00%-0.99%
1 Month Performance-6.98%1.58%1.55%4.82%
1 Year Performance-24.53%10.66%10.73%29.27%

Greenlane Renewables Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GRN
Greenlane Renewables
N/AC$0.20
-2.4%
N/A-24.5%C$32.76MC$43.21MN/A146
XBC
Xebec Adsorption
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$78.91MC$155.36MN/A600
NXH
Next Hydrogen Solutions
N/AC$0.47
-6.0%
N/A+4.2%C$32.58MC$3.99MN/A43
ENW
EnWave
0.3048 of 5 stars
C$0.29
+7.4%
N/A-32.4%C$32.05MC$12.29MN/A28
REK
Reko International Group
N/AC$4.25
+2.4%
N/A+0.0%C$27.39MN/AN/A147,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:GRN) was last updated on 9/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners