Free Trial

Greenlane Renewables (GRN) Competitors

Greenlane Renewables logo
C$0.22 -0.01 (-2.22%)
As of 06/8/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

GRN vs. FCF, PWM, RM, PNP, and DB

Should you buy Greenlane Renewables stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Greenlane Renewables with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Greenlane Renewables include Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V) (FCF), Power Metals (PWM), Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V) (RM), Pinetree Capital (PNP), and Decibel Cannabis (DB). These companies are all part of the "banking" industry.

How does Greenlane Renewables compare to Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V)?

Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V) (CVE:FCF) and Greenlane Renewables (TSE:GRN) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, valuation and media sentiment.

Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V) has higher revenue and earnings than Greenlane Renewables. Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greenlane Renewables, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V)C$81.50M1.47-C$761.66K-C$0.02N/A
Greenlane RenewablesC$46.97M0.75-C$21.61M-C$0.01N/A

Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V) has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Greenlane Renewables' net margin of -4.32%. Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V)'s return on equity of 0.00% beat Greenlane Renewables' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V)N/A N/A N/A
Greenlane Renewables -4.32%-8.55%-9.89%

3.3% of Greenlane Renewables shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.1% of Greenlane Renewables shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Greenlane Renewables had 1 more articles in the media than Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V). MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Greenlane Renewables and 0 mentions for Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V). Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V)'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Greenlane Renewables'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V) Neutral
Greenlane Renewables Neutral

Summary

Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V) beats Greenlane Renewables on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greenlane Renewables compare to Power Metals?

Power Metals (CVE:PWM) and Greenlane Renewables (TSE:GRN) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and earnings.

In the previous week, Greenlane Renewables had 1 more articles in the media than Power Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Greenlane Renewables and 0 mentions for Power Metals. Power Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Greenlane Renewables'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Power Metals Neutral
Greenlane Renewables Neutral

Power Metals has a beta of 0.165336, meaning that its stock price is 83% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greenlane Renewables has a beta of 3.698717, meaning that its stock price is 270% more volatile than the broader market.

0.2% of Power Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.3% of Greenlane Renewables shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of Power Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.1% of Greenlane Renewables shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Power Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Greenlane Renewables' net margin of -4.32%. Greenlane Renewables' return on equity of -8.55% beat Power Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Power MetalsN/A -14.36% -16.97%
Greenlane Renewables -4.32%-8.55%-9.89%

Power Metals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Greenlane Renewables. Power Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greenlane Renewables, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Power MetalsN/AN/A-C$845.76K-C$0.01N/A
Greenlane RenewablesC$46.97M0.75-C$21.61M-C$0.01N/A

Summary

Greenlane Renewables beats Power Metals on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greenlane Renewables compare to Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V)?

Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V) (CVE:RM) and Greenlane Renewables (TSE:GRN) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Greenlane Renewables. Greenlane Renewables is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V)-C$20.54K-4,102.27C$5.58MC$0.0615.09
Greenlane RenewablesC$46.97M0.75-C$21.61M-C$0.01N/A

In the previous week, Greenlane Renewables had 1 more articles in the media than Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V). MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Greenlane Renewables and 0 mentions for Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V). Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V)'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Greenlane Renewables'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V) Neutral
Greenlane Renewables Neutral

Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V) has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Greenlane Renewables' net margin of -4.32%. Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V)'s return on equity of 0.00% beat Greenlane Renewables' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V)N/A N/A N/A
Greenlane Renewables -4.32%-8.55%-9.89%

3.3% of Greenlane Renewables shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.1% of Greenlane Renewables shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V) beats Greenlane Renewables on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greenlane Renewables compare to Pinetree Capital?

Greenlane Renewables (TSE:GRN) and Pinetree Capital (TSE:PNP) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation and media sentiment.

Greenlane Renewables has a net margin of -4.32% compared to Pinetree Capital's net margin of -355.44%. Greenlane Renewables' return on equity of -8.55% beat Pinetree Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Greenlane Renewables-4.32% -8.55% -9.89%
Pinetree Capital -355.44%-23.88%17.18%

In the previous week, Greenlane Renewables and Greenlane Renewables both had 1 articles in the media. Pinetree Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Greenlane Renewables' score of 0.00 indicating that Pinetree Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Greenlane Renewables
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Pinetree Capital
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Pinetree Capital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Greenlane Renewables. Greenlane Renewables is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pinetree Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greenlane RenewablesC$46.97M0.75-C$21.61M-C$0.01N/A
Pinetree CapitalC$3.45M24.47C$18.94M-C$2.11N/A

3.3% of Greenlane Renewables shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.1% of Pinetree Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 9.1% of Greenlane Renewables shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 43.4% of Pinetree Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Greenlane Renewables has a beta of 3.698717, meaning that its share price is 270% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pinetree Capital has a beta of 0.932638, meaning that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pinetree Capital beats Greenlane Renewables on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greenlane Renewables compare to Decibel Cannabis?

Greenlane Renewables (TSE:GRN) and Decibel Cannabis (CVE:DB) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Decibel Cannabis has higher revenue and earnings than Greenlane Renewables. Greenlane Renewables is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Decibel Cannabis, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greenlane RenewablesC$46.97M0.75-C$21.61M-C$0.01N/A
Decibel CannabisC$121.32M0.55-C$1.03M-C$0.01N/A

Decibel Cannabis has a consensus target price of C$0.18, suggesting a potential upside of 52.17%. Given Decibel Cannabis' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Decibel Cannabis is more favorable than Greenlane Renewables.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Greenlane Renewables
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Decibel Cannabis
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.50

Decibel Cannabis has a net margin of -3.78% compared to Greenlane Renewables' net margin of -4.32%. Decibel Cannabis' return on equity of -1.05% beat Greenlane Renewables' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Greenlane Renewables-4.32% -8.55% -9.89%
Decibel Cannabis -3.78%-1.05%3.04%

In the previous week, Greenlane Renewables had 1 more articles in the media than Decibel Cannabis. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Greenlane Renewables and 0 mentions for Decibel Cannabis. Greenlane Renewables' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Decibel Cannabis'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Greenlane Renewables Neutral
Decibel Cannabis Neutral

Greenlane Renewables has a beta of 3.698717, suggesting that its stock price is 270% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Decibel Cannabis has a beta of -0.07358, suggesting that its stock price is 107% less volatile than the broader market.

3.3% of Greenlane Renewables shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Decibel Cannabis shares are held by institutional investors. 9.1% of Greenlane Renewables shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Decibel Cannabis shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Decibel Cannabis beats Greenlane Renewables on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Greenlane Renewables News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GRN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GRN vs. The Competition

MetricGreenlane RenewablesPollution & Treatment Controls IndustryIndustrials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$35.12MC$574.90MC$9.41BC$12.15B
Dividend YieldN/A19.51%3.55%6.20%
P/E Ratio-22.009.9325.0536.88
Price / Sales0.7537.354,986.4710.43
Price / Cash3.6118.2327.3782.29
Price / Book1.613.314.804.44
Net Income-C$21.61MC$38.62MC$793.53MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-3.30%3.68%1.73%-2.83%
1 Month Performance-8.33%17.76%2,657.81%-1.59%
1 Year PerformanceN/A39.28%29.72%42.96%

Greenlane Renewables Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GRN
Greenlane Renewables
N/AC$0.22
-2.2%
N/A+109.5%C$35.12MC$46.97MN/A146
FCF
Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V)
N/AC$3.15
flat
N/A+0.0%C$119.96MC$81.50MN/A1,400
PWM
Power Metals
N/AC$0.62
+1.6%
N/A-36.6%C$108.20MN/AN/AN/A
RM
Routemaster Capital Inc. (RM.V)
N/AC$0.83
+1.2%
N/A+0.0%C$84.26M-C$20.54K15.091,990
PNP
Pinetree Capital
N/AC$8.89
+0.5%
N/A-52.9%C$83.45MC$3.45MN/A61,500

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:GRN) was last updated on 6/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners