Free Trial
→ This free guide explains options the way they should be taught (From Base Camp Trading) (Ad)tc pixel Free IMO Stock Alerts

Imperial Oil (IMO) Competitors

Imperial Oil logo
C$175.76 +1.02 (+0.58%)
As of 10/9/2026 04:42 PM Eastern
Compare

IMO vs. SU, CVE, CONA, ENB, and CNQ

Should you buy Imperial Oil stock or one of its competitors? Imperial Oil's main competitors and comparable companies include Suncor Energy (SU), Cenovus Energy (CVE), Cona Resources (CONA), Enbridge (ENB), and Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil, gas & consumable fuels" industry.

How does Imperial Oil compare to Suncor Energy?

Imperial Oil (TSE:IMO) and Suncor Energy (TSE:SU) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Suncor Energy had 12 more articles in the media than Imperial Oil. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Suncor Energy and 2 mentions for Imperial Oil. Imperial Oil's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Suncor Energy's score of 0.46 indicating that Imperial Oil is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Imperial Oil
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Suncor Energy
3 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Imperial Oil presently has a consensus price target of C$146.08, suggesting a potential downside of 16.88%. Suncor Energy has a consensus price target of C$100.94, suggesting a potential downside of 2.04%. Given Suncor Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Suncor Energy is more favorable than Imperial Oil.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Imperial Oil
5 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Suncor Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.77

18.1% of Imperial Oil shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.5% of Suncor Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 71.3% of Imperial Oil shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Suncor Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Imperial Oil has a beta of 0.622353, indicating that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Suncor Energy has a beta of 0.179534, indicating that its share price is 82% less volatile than the broader market.

Imperial Oil pays an annual dividend of C$3.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Suncor Energy pays an annual dividend of C$2.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Imperial Oil pays out 37.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Suncor Energy pays out 31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Suncor Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Suncor Energy has a net margin of 15.32% compared to Imperial Oil's net margin of 7.81%. Suncor Energy's return on equity of 19.38% beat Imperial Oil's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Imperial Oil7.81% 18.76% 9.78%
Suncor Energy 15.32%19.38%7.01%

Suncor Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Imperial Oil. Suncor Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Imperial Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Imperial OilC$50.47B1.68C$4.85BC$8.5620.53
Suncor EnergyC$60.73B1.98C$7.92BC$7.4913.76

Summary

Suncor Energy beats Imperial Oil on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Imperial Oil compare to Cenovus Energy?

Imperial Oil (TSE:IMO) and Cenovus Energy (TSE:CVE) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, Cenovus Energy had 17 more articles in the media than Imperial Oil. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Cenovus Energy and 2 mentions for Imperial Oil. Cenovus Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Imperial Oil's score of 0.50 indicating that Cenovus Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Imperial Oil
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Cenovus Energy
6 Very Positive mention(s)
9 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

18.1% of Imperial Oil shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.8% of Cenovus Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 71.3% of Imperial Oil shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 32.0% of Cenovus Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Imperial Oil currently has a consensus price target of C$146.08, indicating a potential downside of 16.88%. Cenovus Energy has a consensus price target of C$46.06, indicating a potential upside of 2.93%. Given Cenovus Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cenovus Energy is more favorable than Imperial Oil.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Imperial Oil
5 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Cenovus Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.07

Cenovus Energy has a net margin of 12.37% compared to Imperial Oil's net margin of 7.81%. Cenovus Energy's return on equity of 21.02% beat Imperial Oil's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Imperial Oil7.81% 18.76% 9.78%
Cenovus Energy 12.37%21.02%7.58%

Imperial Oil has a beta of 0.622353, indicating that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cenovus Energy has a beta of 0.2785, indicating that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market.

Imperial Oil has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cenovus Energy. Cenovus Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Imperial Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Imperial OilC$50.47B1.68C$4.85BC$8.5620.53
Cenovus EnergyC$58.03B1.42C$3.69BC$3.6012.43

Imperial Oil pays an annual dividend of C$3.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Cenovus Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.82 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Imperial Oil pays out 37.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cenovus Energy pays out 22.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cenovus Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Cenovus Energy beats Imperial Oil on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Imperial Oil compare to Cona Resources?

Imperial Oil (TSE:IMO) and Cona Resources (TSE:CONA) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

Imperial Oil pays an annual dividend of C$3.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Cona Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share. Imperial Oil pays out 37.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cona Resources pays out -6.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Imperial Oil presently has a consensus price target of C$146.08, indicating a potential downside of 16.88%. Given Cona Resources' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cona Resources is more favorable than Imperial Oil.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Imperial Oil
5 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Cona Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Imperial Oil has a net margin of 7.81% compared to Cona Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Imperial Oil's return on equity of 18.76% beat Cona Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Imperial Oil7.81% 18.76% 9.78%
Cona Resources N/A N/A N/A

18.1% of Imperial Oil shares are held by institutional investors. 71.3% of Imperial Oil shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Imperial Oil has higher revenue and earnings than Cona Resources. Cona Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Imperial Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Imperial OilC$50.47B1.68C$4.85BC$8.5620.53
Cona ResourcesC$329.45M0.00-C$131.31M-C$1.30N/A

In the previous week, Imperial Oil had 2 more articles in the media than Cona Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Imperial Oil and 0 mentions for Cona Resources. Imperial Oil's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Cona Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Imperial Oil is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Imperial Oil Neutral
Cona Resources Neutral

Summary

Imperial Oil beats Cona Resources on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Imperial Oil compare to Enbridge?

Imperial Oil (TSE:IMO) and Enbridge (TSE:ENB) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and valuation.

In the previous week, Enbridge had 2 more articles in the media than Imperial Oil. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Enbridge and 2 mentions for Imperial Oil. Imperial Oil's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Enbridge's score of 0.13 indicating that Imperial Oil is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Imperial Oil
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Enbridge
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Enbridge has higher revenue and earnings than Imperial Oil. Imperial Oil is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enbridge, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Imperial OilC$50.47B1.68C$4.85BC$8.5620.53
EnbridgeC$83.49B1.78C$6.63BC$2.5925.68

Imperial Oil has a beta of 0.622353, meaning that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enbridge has a beta of 0.719617, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

18.1% of Imperial Oil shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.1% of Enbridge shares are held by institutional investors. 71.3% of Imperial Oil shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Enbridge shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Imperial Oil has a net margin of 7.81% compared to Enbridge's net margin of 7.28%. Imperial Oil's return on equity of 18.76% beat Enbridge's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Imperial Oil7.81% 18.76% 9.78%
Enbridge 7.28%10.01%3.07%

Imperial Oil presently has a consensus price target of C$146.08, indicating a potential downside of 16.88%. Enbridge has a consensus price target of C$77.63, indicating a potential upside of 16.71%. Given Enbridge's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Enbridge is more favorable than Imperial Oil.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Imperial Oil
5 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Enbridge
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85

Imperial Oil pays an annual dividend of C$3.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Enbridge pays an annual dividend of C$3.83 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Imperial Oil pays out 37.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enbridge pays out 147.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Enbridge beats Imperial Oil on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Imperial Oil compare to Canadian Natural Resources?

Imperial Oil (TSE:IMO) and Canadian Natural Resources (TSE:CNQ) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

18.1% of Imperial Oil shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.1% of Canadian Natural Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 71.3% of Imperial Oil shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Canadian Natural Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Imperial Oil and Imperial Oil both had 2 articles in the media. Canadian Natural Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Imperial Oil's score of 0.50 indicating that Canadian Natural Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Imperial Oil
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Canadian Natural Resources
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Canadian Natural Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Imperial Oil. Canadian Natural Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Imperial Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Imperial OilC$50.47B1.68C$4.85BC$8.5620.53
Canadian Natural ResourcesC$51.40B2.84C$7.52BC$5.6212.60

Imperial Oil presently has a consensus price target of C$146.08, suggesting a potential downside of 16.88%. Canadian Natural Resources has a consensus price target of C$67.12, suggesting a potential downside of 5.20%. Given Canadian Natural Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Canadian Natural Resources is more favorable than Imperial Oil.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Imperial Oil
5 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Canadian Natural Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.54

Imperial Oil pays an annual dividend of C$3.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Canadian Natural Resources pays an annual dividend of C$2.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Imperial Oil pays out 37.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Canadian Natural Resources pays out 43.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Canadian Natural Resources has a net margin of 24.93% compared to Imperial Oil's net margin of 7.81%. Canadian Natural Resources' return on equity of 26.67% beat Imperial Oil's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Imperial Oil7.81% 18.76% 9.78%
Canadian Natural Resources 24.93%26.67%8.80%

Imperial Oil has a beta of 0.622353, meaning that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Canadian Natural Resources has a beta of 0.377169, meaning that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Canadian Natural Resources beats Imperial Oil on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Imperial Oil News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for IMO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding IMO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

IMO vs. The Competition

Export
MetricImperial OilOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$84.50BC$11.66BC$10.18BC$12.70B
Dividend Yield1.99%10.17%10.66%6.35%
P/E Ratio20.5317.3120.5438.68
Price / Sales1.68603.19493.089.04
Price / Cash12.2141.2437.2982.29
Price / Book3.464.534.094.47
Net IncomeC$4.85BC$5.27BC$4.35BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-2.01%0.49%0.66%0.02%
1 Month Performance-2.99%-4.00%-3.76%-1.31%
1 Year Performance44.12%32.51%33.81%17.51%

Imperial Oil Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
IMO
Imperial Oil
2.0991 of 5 stars		C$175.76
+0.6%		C$146.08
-16.9%		+42.2%C$84.50BC$50.47B20.535,000
SU
Suncor Energy
3.2627 of 5 stars		C$97.99
-1.2%		C$100.00
+2.1%		+81.9%C$114.61BC$60.73B13.0815,424
CVE
Cenovus Energy
3.7372 of 5 stars		C$44.86
-3.0%		C$45.19
+0.7%		+76.5%C$82.73BC$58.03B12.467,211
CONA
Cona Resources
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$256.56MC$329.45MN/AN/A
ENB
Enbridge
3.2925 of 5 stars		C$65.65
+0.2%		C$77.63
+18.2%		-1.2%C$143.39BC$83.49B25.3514,800

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:IMO) was last updated on 10/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The investigation Porter spent tens of thousands to document
Porter Stansberry flew the Porter and Co. team 3,300 miles to Dublin to investigate a 17-year investing experi...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
The only 5 stocks that matter
SpaceX's IPO reportedly minted 4,400 new millionaires, and OpenAI is said to be eyeing a 1 trillion dollar IPO...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
This free guide explains options the way they should be taught
Most options educators jump straight into Greeks, spreads, and implied volatility - losing beginners before th...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
This high yielding “gold annuity” is starting to move…
Garrett Goggin, a 20+ year gold analyst, has called major moves before: Montage Gold up 2,567%, G2 Goldfields ...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
New Chip takes minutes, not days
George Gilder believes today's AI data centers could become tomorrow's typewriters - replaced by a single wafe...
Eagle Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump goes "all-in" on Grand Canyon energy breakthrough
A drilling crew near the Grand Canyon uncovered a clean energy well producing nearly eight times the output of...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Tech expert smashes iPhone with golf club
Twenty years ago, Josh Baylin told Congress the iPhone was coming, three years before it launched. A $1,500 be...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel