Free Trial

K92 Mining (KNT) Competitors

K92 Mining logo
C$28.17 +0.42 (+1.51%)
As of 10/9/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

KNT vs. PAAS, LUG, EDV, AGI, and EQX

Should you buy K92 Mining stock or one of its competitors? K92 Mining's main competitors and comparable companies include Pan American Silver (PAAS), Lundin Gold (LUG), Endeavour Mining (EDV), Alamos Gold (AGI), and Equinox Gold (EQX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does K92 Mining compare to Pan American Silver?

K92 Mining (TSE:KNT) and Pan American Silver (TSE:PAAS) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and analyst recommendations.

K92 Mining presently has a consensus price target of C$37.20, indicating a potential upside of 32.06%. Pan American Silver has a consensus price target of C$84.40, indicating a potential upside of 27.78%. Given K92 Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe K92 Mining is more favorable than Pan American Silver.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
K92 Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33
Pan American Silver
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

K92 Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pan American Silver. K92 Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pan American Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
K92 MiningC$795.83M8.70C$53.92MC$1.4719.16
Pan American SilverC$4.31B6.35-C$33.47MC$3.3819.54

In the previous week, K92 Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Pan American Silver. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for K92 Mining and 0 mentions for Pan American Silver. K92 Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Pan American Silver's score of 0.68 indicating that K92 Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
K92 Mining Positive
Pan American Silver Positive

K92 Mining has a net margin of 45.48% compared to Pan American Silver's net margin of 32.06%. K92 Mining's return on equity of 43.29% beat Pan American Silver's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
K92 Mining45.48% 43.29% 7.49%
Pan American Silver 32.06%19.61%0.43%

K92 Mining has a beta of 1.875751, suggesting that its stock price is 88% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan American Silver has a beta of 2.071579, suggesting that its stock price is 107% more volatile than the broader market.

42.5% of K92 Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.3% of Pan American Silver shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of K92 Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Pan American Silver shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

K92 Mining beats Pan American Silver on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does K92 Mining compare to Lundin Gold?

K92 Mining (TSE:KNT) and Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, media sentiment and risk.

In the previous week, Lundin Gold had 5 more articles in the media than K92 Mining. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Lundin Gold and 1 mentions for K92 Mining. K92 Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Lundin Gold's score of 0.24 indicating that K92 Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
K92 Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Lundin Gold
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

42.5% of K92 Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.9% of Lundin Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 2.5% of K92 Mining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

K92 Mining has a beta of 1.875751, meaning that its share price is 88% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.68889, meaning that its share price is 69% more volatile than the broader market.

Lundin Gold has a net margin of 46.31% compared to K92 Mining's net margin of 45.48%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 81.63% beat K92 Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
K92 Mining45.48% 43.29% 7.49%
Lundin Gold 46.31%81.63%17.59%

Lundin Gold has higher revenue and earnings than K92 Mining. K92 Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
K92 MiningC$795.83M8.70C$53.92MC$1.4719.16
Lundin GoldC$2.02B11.48C$215.94MC$3.8524.89

K92 Mining presently has a consensus target price of C$37.20, indicating a potential upside of 32.06%. Lundin Gold has a consensus target price of C$108.40, indicating a potential upside of 13.13%. Given K92 Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe K92 Mining is more favorable than Lundin Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
K92 Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33
Lundin Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Lundin Gold beats K92 Mining on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does K92 Mining compare to Endeavour Mining?

K92 Mining (TSE:KNT) and Endeavour Mining (TSE:EDV) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, risk, dividends and valuation.

In the previous week, Endeavour Mining had 1 more articles in the media than K92 Mining. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Endeavour Mining and 1 mentions for K92 Mining. K92 Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Endeavour Mining's score of -1.05 indicating that K92 Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
K92 Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Endeavour Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

K92 Mining has a net margin of 45.48% compared to Endeavour Mining's net margin of 17.62%. K92 Mining's return on equity of 43.29% beat Endeavour Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
K92 Mining45.48% 43.29% 7.49%
Endeavour Mining 17.62%26.17%3.54%

K92 Mining presently has a consensus price target of C$37.20, suggesting a potential upside of 32.06%. Endeavour Mining has a consensus price target of C$93.50, suggesting a potential upside of 20.88%. Given K92 Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe K92 Mining is more favorable than Endeavour Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
K92 Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33
Endeavour Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

K92 Mining has a beta of 1.875751, indicating that its stock price is 88% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Endeavour Mining has a beta of 1.892701, indicating that its stock price is 89% more volatile than the broader market.

42.5% of K92 Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.1% of Endeavour Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 2.5% of K92 Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.1% of Endeavour Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

K92 Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Endeavour Mining. K92 Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Endeavour Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
K92 MiningC$795.83M8.70C$53.92MC$1.4719.16
Endeavour MiningC$4.75B3.92-C$239.30MC$3.4022.75

Summary

K92 Mining beats Endeavour Mining on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does K92 Mining compare to Alamos Gold?

Alamos Gold (TSE:AGI) and K92 Mining (TSE:KNT) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than K92 Mining. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than K92 Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alamos GoldC$2.23B8.82C$174.87MC$2.7916.82
K92 MiningC$795.83M8.70C$53.92MC$1.4719.16

In the previous week, K92 Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Alamos Gold. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for K92 Mining and 0 mentions for Alamos Gold. K92 Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Alamos Gold's score of 0.00 indicating that K92 Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Alamos Gold Neutral
K92 Mining Positive

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 52.85% compared to K92 Mining's net margin of 45.48%. K92 Mining's return on equity of 43.29% beat Alamos Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alamos Gold52.85% 26.10% 5.85%
K92 Mining 45.48%43.29%7.49%

Alamos Gold currently has a consensus price target of C$76.67, indicating a potential upside of 63.36%. K92 Mining has a consensus price target of C$37.20, indicating a potential upside of 32.06%. Given Alamos Gold's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than K92 Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Alamos Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
K92 Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33

52.1% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.5% of K92 Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of K92 Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 2.07106, indicating that its stock price is 107% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, K92 Mining has a beta of 1.875751, indicating that its stock price is 88% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Alamos Gold beats K92 Mining on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does K92 Mining compare to Equinox Gold?

Equinox Gold (TSE:EQX) and K92 Mining (TSE:KNT) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and dividends.

In the previous week, Equinox Gold had 1 more articles in the media than K92 Mining. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Equinox Gold and 1 mentions for K92 Mining. K92 Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Equinox Gold's score of 0.83 indicating that K92 Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Equinox Gold
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
K92 Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Equinox Gold currently has a consensus target price of C$24.50, suggesting a potential upside of 50.12%. K92 Mining has a consensus target price of C$37.20, suggesting a potential upside of 32.06%. Given Equinox Gold's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Equinox Gold is more favorable than K92 Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Equinox Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.17
K92 Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33

Equinox Gold has a beta of 3.277832, indicating that its share price is 228% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, K92 Mining has a beta of 1.875751, indicating that its share price is 88% more volatile than the broader market.

42.4% of Equinox Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.5% of K92 Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 6.4% of Equinox Gold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of K92 Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

K92 Mining has a net margin of 45.48% compared to Equinox Gold's net margin of 26.36%. K92 Mining's return on equity of 43.29% beat Equinox Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Equinox Gold26.36% 13.85% 0.47%
K92 Mining 45.48%43.29%7.49%

Equinox Gold has higher revenue and earnings than K92 Mining. Equinox Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than K92 Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Equinox GoldC$2.90B6.58C$214.45MC$1.0815.11
K92 MiningC$795.83M8.70C$53.92MC$1.4719.16

Summary

K92 Mining beats Equinox Gold on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get K92 Mining News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for KNT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding KNT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

KNT vs. The Competition

MetricK92 MiningMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$6.92BC$3.83BC$4.77BC$12.70B
Dividend YieldN/A5.25%4.78%6.35%
P/E Ratio19.1624.7224.3938.68
Price / Sales8.7025,955.8515,482.349.04
Price / Cash17.7727.1224.9782.29
Price / Book7.0911.849.854.47
Net IncomeC$53.92MC$127.34MC$159.48MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance2.07%0.92%0.52%0.02%
1 Month Performance-3.89%-2.45%-2.74%-1.53%
1 Year Performance47.72%21.23%18.43%17.32%

K92 Mining Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
KNT
K92 Mining
2.7608 of 5 stars
C$28.17
+1.5%
C$37.20
+32.1%
+47.7%C$6.92BC$795.83M19.161,650
PAAS
Pan American Silver
2.8921 of 5 stars
C$64.74
-1.1%
C$84.40
+30.4%
+22.5%C$26.84BC$4.31B19.159,348
LUG
Lundin Gold
2.0402 of 5 stars
C$87.24
-0.6%
C$99.33
+13.9%
+3.0%C$21.10BC$2.02B22.661,893
EDV
Endeavour Mining
2.5115 of 5 stars
C$80.21
-1.1%
C$93.50
+16.6%
+33.3%C$19.33BC$4.75B23.595,659
AGI
Alamos Gold
2.1041 of 5 stars
C$46.07
-1.8%
C$76.67
+66.4%
+1.5%C$19.29BC$2.23B16.512,400

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:KNT) was last updated on 10/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners