Which has better valuation and earnings, KNT or LUG?

Lundin Gold has higher revenue and earnings than K92 Mining. K92 Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio K92 Mining C$795.83M 8.79 C$53.92M C$1.29 22.12 Lundin Gold C$2.02B 10.83 C$215.94M C$3.85 23.48

Is KNT or LUG more profitable?

Lundin Gold has a net margin of 46.31% compared to K92 Mining's net margin of 45.48%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 81.63% beat K92 Mining's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets K92 Mining 45.48% 43.29% 7.49% Lundin Gold 46.31% 81.63% 17.59%

Does the media prefer KNT or LUG?

In the previous week, K92 Mining and K92 Mining both had 4 articles in the media. K92 Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Lundin Gold's score of -0.47 indicating that K92 Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment K92 Mining 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Lundin Gold 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher earnings & valuation, KNT or EDV?

K92 Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Endeavour Mining. K92 Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Endeavour Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio K92 Mining C$795.83M 8.79 C$53.92M C$1.29 22.12 Endeavour Mining C$4.75B 3.93 -C$239.30M C$3.40 22.77

Does the media favor KNT or EDV?

In the previous week, Endeavour Mining had 1 more articles in the media than K92 Mining. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Endeavour Mining and 4 mentions for K92 Mining. K92 Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Endeavour Mining's score of 0.02 indicating that K92 Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment K92 Mining 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Endeavour Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, AGI or KNT?

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than K92 Mining. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than K92 Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Alamos Gold C$2.23B 8.68 C$174.87M C$2.79 16.56 K92 Mining C$795.83M 8.79 C$53.92M C$1.29 22.12

Is AGI or KNT more profitable?

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 52.85% compared to K92 Mining's net margin of 45.48%. K92 Mining's return on equity of 43.29% beat Alamos Gold's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Alamos Gold 52.85% 26.10% 5.85% K92 Mining 45.48% 43.29% 7.49%

Does the media refer more to AGI or KNT?

In the previous week, K92 Mining had 2 more articles in the media than Alamos Gold. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for K92 Mining and 2 mentions for Alamos Gold. K92 Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Alamos Gold's score of -0.37 indicating that K92 Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Alamos Gold 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral K92 Mining 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend CGG or KNT?

K92 Mining has a consensus target price of C$37.20, suggesting a potential upside of 30.39%. Given K92 Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe K92 Mining is more favorable than China Gold International Resources. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score China Gold International Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 K92 Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.33

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, IMG or KNT?

IAMGOLD has higher revenue and earnings than K92 Mining. IAMGOLD is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than K92 Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio IAMGOLD C$3.68B 3.95 C$557.06M C$1.98 12.85 K92 Mining C$795.83M 8.79 C$53.92M C$1.29 22.12

Is IMG or KNT more profitable?

K92 Mining has a net margin of 45.48% compared to IAMGOLD's net margin of 31.46%. K92 Mining's return on equity of 43.29% beat IAMGOLD's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets IAMGOLD 31.46% 28.08% 2.54% K92 Mining 45.48% 43.29% 7.49%

Does the media refer more to IMG or KNT?

In the previous week, IAMGOLD and IAMGOLD both had 4 articles in the media. K92 Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat IAMGOLD's score of 0.70 indicating that K92 Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment IAMGOLD 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive K92 Mining 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

K92 Mining (KNT) Competitors

C$28.53 +0.36 (+1.28%)

As of 12:46 PM Eastern

Compare

KNT vs. LUG, EDV, AGI, CGG, and IMG

Should you buy K92 Mining stock or one of its competitors? K92 Mining's main competitors and comparable companies include Lundin Gold (LUG), Endeavour Mining (EDV), Alamos Gold (AGI), China Gold International Resources (CGG), and IAMGOLD (IMG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does K92 Mining compare to Lundin Gold?

K92 Mining (TSE:KNT) and Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

In the previous week, K92 Mining and K92 Mining both had 4 articles in the media. K92 Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Lundin Gold's score of -0.47 indicating that K92 Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
K92 Mining	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Lundin Gold	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

41.9% of K92 Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.2% of Lundin Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of K92 Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Lundin Gold has a net margin of 46.31% compared to K92 Mining's net margin of 45.48%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 81.63% beat K92 Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
K92 Mining	45.48%	43.29%	7.49%
Lundin Gold	46.31%	81.63%	17.59%

K92 Mining has a beta of 1.802163, suggesting that its stock price is 80% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.619444, suggesting that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the broader market.

K92 Mining presently has a consensus price target of C$37.20, suggesting a potential upside of 30.39%. Lundin Gold has a consensus price target of C$101.33, suggesting a potential upside of 12.09%. Given K92 Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe K92 Mining is more favorable than Lundin Gold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
K92 Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.33
Lundin Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Lundin Gold has higher revenue and earnings than K92 Mining. K92 Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
K92 Mining	C$795.83M	8.79	C$53.92M	C$1.29	22.12
Lundin Gold	C$2.02B	10.83	C$215.94M	C$3.85	23.48

Summary

Lundin Gold beats K92 Mining on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does K92 Mining compare to Endeavour Mining?

K92 Mining (TSE:KNT) and Endeavour Mining (TSE:EDV) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, Endeavour Mining had 1 more articles in the media than K92 Mining. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Endeavour Mining and 4 mentions for K92 Mining. K92 Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Endeavour Mining's score of 0.02 indicating that K92 Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
K92 Mining	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Endeavour Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

K92 Mining currently has a consensus target price of C$37.20, suggesting a potential upside of 30.39%. Endeavour Mining has a consensus target price of C$93.50, suggesting a potential upside of 20.79%. Given K92 Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe K92 Mining is more favorable than Endeavour Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
K92 Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.33
Endeavour Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

K92 Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Endeavour Mining. K92 Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Endeavour Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
K92 Mining	C$795.83M	8.79	C$53.92M	C$1.29	22.12
Endeavour Mining	C$4.75B	3.93	-C$239.30M	C$3.40	22.77

K92 Mining has a net margin of 45.48% compared to Endeavour Mining's net margin of 17.62%. K92 Mining's return on equity of 43.29% beat Endeavour Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
K92 Mining	45.48%	43.29%	7.49%
Endeavour Mining	17.62%	26.17%	3.54%

K92 Mining has a beta of 1.802163, suggesting that its share price is 80% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Endeavour Mining has a beta of 1.817844, suggesting that its share price is 82% more volatile than the broader market.

41.9% of K92 Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.5% of Endeavour Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of K92 Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.1% of Endeavour Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

K92 Mining beats Endeavour Mining on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does K92 Mining compare to Alamos Gold?

Alamos Gold (TSE:AGI) and K92 Mining (TSE:KNT) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and profitability.

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than K92 Mining. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than K92 Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Alamos Gold	C$2.23B	8.68	C$174.87M	C$2.79	16.56
K92 Mining	C$795.83M	8.79	C$53.92M	C$1.29	22.12

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 52.85% compared to K92 Mining's net margin of 45.48%. K92 Mining's return on equity of 43.29% beat Alamos Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Alamos Gold	52.85%	26.10%	5.85%
K92 Mining	45.48%	43.29%	7.49%

Alamos Gold currently has a consensus price target of C$74.70, suggesting a potential upside of 61.65%. K92 Mining has a consensus price target of C$37.20, suggesting a potential upside of 30.39%. Given Alamos Gold's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than K92 Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Alamos Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
K92 Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.33

52.6% of Alamos Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.9% of K92 Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Alamos Gold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of K92 Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 1.871669, indicating that its share price is 87% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, K92 Mining has a beta of 1.802163, indicating that its share price is 80% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, K92 Mining had 2 more articles in the media than Alamos Gold. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for K92 Mining and 2 mentions for Alamos Gold. K92 Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Alamos Gold's score of -0.37 indicating that K92 Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Alamos Gold	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
K92 Mining	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

K92 Mining beats Alamos Gold on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does K92 Mining compare to China Gold International Resources?

China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) and K92 Mining (TSE:KNT) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and profitability.

24.8% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.9% of K92 Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of K92 Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, K92 Mining had 4 more articles in the media than China Gold International Resources. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for K92 Mining and 0 mentions for China Gold International Resources. K92 Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat China Gold International Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that K92 Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
China Gold International Resources	Neutral
K92 Mining	Positive

K92 Mining has a consensus target price of C$37.20, suggesting a potential upside of 30.39%. Given K92 Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe K92 Mining is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
China Gold International Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
K92 Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.33

China Gold International Resources has a beta of 1.877336, indicating that its share price is 88% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, K92 Mining has a beta of 1.802163, indicating that its share price is 80% more volatile than the broader market.

K92 Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than China Gold International Resources. K92 Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
China Gold International Resources	C$1.49B	10.13	-C$15.76M	C$1.55	24.51
K92 Mining	C$795.83M	8.79	C$53.92M	C$1.29	22.12

K92 Mining has a net margin of 45.48% compared to China Gold International Resources' net margin of 41.16%. K92 Mining's return on equity of 43.29% beat China Gold International Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
China Gold International Resources	41.16%	27.74%	-1.06%
K92 Mining	45.48%	43.29%	7.49%

Summary

K92 Mining beats China Gold International Resources on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does K92 Mining compare to IAMGOLD?

IAMGOLD (TSE:IMG) and K92 Mining (TSE:KNT) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and profitability.

IAMGOLD has higher revenue and earnings than K92 Mining. IAMGOLD is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than K92 Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
IAMGOLD	C$3.68B	3.95	C$557.06M	C$1.98	12.85
K92 Mining	C$795.83M	8.79	C$53.92M	C$1.29	22.12

IAMGOLD currently has a consensus price target of C$31.07, suggesting a potential upside of 22.09%. K92 Mining has a consensus price target of C$37.20, suggesting a potential upside of 30.39%. Given K92 Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe K92 Mining is more favorable than IAMGOLD.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
IAMGOLD	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
K92 Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.33

K92 Mining has a net margin of 45.48% compared to IAMGOLD's net margin of 31.46%. K92 Mining's return on equity of 43.29% beat IAMGOLD's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
IAMGOLD	31.46%	28.08%	2.54%
K92 Mining	45.48%	43.29%	7.49%

In the previous week, IAMGOLD and IAMGOLD both had 4 articles in the media. K92 Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat IAMGOLD's score of 0.70 indicating that K92 Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
IAMGOLD	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
K92 Mining	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

IAMGOLD has a beta of 2.148395, indicating that its stock price is 115% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, K92 Mining has a beta of 1.802163, indicating that its stock price is 80% more volatile than the broader market.

55.4% of IAMGOLD shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.9% of K92 Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of IAMGOLD shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of K92 Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

K92 Mining beats IAMGOLD on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get K92 Mining News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding KNT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

KNT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	K92 Mining	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$6.99B	C$3.78B	C$4.83B	C$12.55B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.22%	4.71%	6.20%
P/E Ratio	22.12	23.47	21.90	30.74
Price / Sales	8.79	7,586.28	4,510.35	9.76
Price / Cash	17.77	29.71	27.13	82.29
Price / Book	7.18	10.49	8.89	4.64
Net Income	C$53.92M	C$122.18M	C$154.16M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	0.14%	1.47%	1.05%	0.92%
1 Month Performance	32.21%	8.06%	6.69%	3.90%
1 Year Performance	93.29%	56.38%	44.54%	36.15%

K92 Mining Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
KNT K92 Mining	3.3264 of 5 stars	C$28.53 +1.3%	C$37.20 +30.4%	+88.9%	C$6.99B	C$795.83M	22.12	N/A	Earnings Report
LUG Lundin Gold	1.9393 of 5 stars	C$86.50 +6.0%	C$102.17 +18.1%	+14.9%	C$20.92B	C$1.99B	22.94	1,645
EDV Endeavour Mining	2.8969 of 5 stars	C$73.63 +8.1%	C$93.50 +27.0%	+70.1%	C$17.75B	C$4.75B	21.66	3,786	Gap Up
AGI Alamos Gold	2.5272 of 5 stars	C$43.82 +8.4%	C$74.70 +70.5%	+29.8%	C$16.92B	C$2.23B	15.71	2,400	Gap Up
CGG China Gold International Resources	N/A	C$39.49 +18.6%	N/A	+158.6%	C$13.20B	C$1.49B	25.42	2,089	Gap Up High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:KNT) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

K92 Mining (KNT) Competitors

KNT vs. LUG, EDV, AGI, CGG, and IMG

How does K92 Mining compare to Lundin Gold?

Summary

How does K92 Mining compare to Endeavour Mining?

Summary

How does K92 Mining compare to Alamos Gold?

Summary

How does K92 Mining compare to China Gold International Resources?

Summary

How does K92 Mining compare to IAMGOLD?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

KNT vs. The Competition

K92 Mining Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

K92 Mining (KNT) Competitors

KNT vs. LUG, EDV, AGI, CGG, and IMG

How does K92 Mining compare to Lundin Gold?

Does the media prefer KNT or LUG?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of KNT or LUG?

Is KNT or LUG more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, KNT or LUG?

Do analysts prefer KNT or LUG?

Which has better valuation and earnings, KNT or LUG?

Summary

How does K92 Mining compare to Endeavour Mining?

Does the media favor KNT or EDV?

Do analysts prefer KNT or EDV?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, KNT or EDV?

Is KNT or EDV more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, KNT or EDV?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of KNT or EDV?

Summary

How does K92 Mining compare to Alamos Gold?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, AGI or KNT?

Is AGI or KNT more profitable?

Do analysts recommend AGI or KNT?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in AGI or KNT?

Which has more risk & volatility, AGI or KNT?

Does the media refer more to AGI or KNT?

Summary

How does K92 Mining compare to China Gold International Resources?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in CGG or KNT?

Does the media refer more to CGG or KNT?

Do analysts recommend CGG or KNT?

Which has more volatility & risk, CGG or KNT?

Which has better valuation & earnings, CGG or KNT?

Is CGG or KNT more profitable?

Summary

How does K92 Mining compare to IAMGOLD?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, IMG or KNT?

Do analysts recommend IMG or KNT?

Is IMG or KNT more profitable?

Does the media refer more to IMG or KNT?

Which has more risk and volatility, IMG or KNT?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in IMG or KNT?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

KNT vs. The Competition

K92 Mining Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools