Free Trial
Final Hours! Save $100 on MarketBeat All Access Before 11:59 PM
  • 0Days
  • 0Hours
  • 0Minutes
  • 0Seconds
Lock In $149 Tonight
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

K92 Mining (KNT) Competitors

K92 Mining logo
C$25.39 +1.02 (+4.19%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

KNT vs. AGI, LUG, EDV, EQX, and IMG

Should you buy K92 Mining stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares K92 Mining with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with K92 Mining include Alamos Gold (AGI), Lundin Gold (LUG), Endeavour Mining (EDV), Equinox Gold (EQX), and IAMGOLD (IMG). These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does K92 Mining compare to Alamos Gold?

K92 Mining (TSE:KNT) and Alamos Gold (TSE:AGI) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than K92 Mining. K92 Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alamos Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
K92 MiningC$686.93M9.06C$53.92MC$1.2919.68
Alamos GoldC$2.07B11.27C$174.87MC$2.5122.17

In the previous week, K92 Mining had 4 more articles in the media than Alamos Gold. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for K92 Mining and 2 mentions for Alamos Gold. Alamos Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat K92 Mining's score of 0.08 indicating that Alamos Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
K92 Mining
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Alamos Gold
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

K92 Mining presently has a consensus target price of C$38.00, suggesting a potential upside of 49.67%. Alamos Gold has a consensus target price of C$76.20, suggesting a potential upside of 36.95%. Given K92 Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe K92 Mining is more favorable than Alamos Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
K92 Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33
Alamos Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.20

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 51.42% compared to K92 Mining's net margin of 46.05%. K92 Mining's return on equity of 42.98% beat Alamos Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
K92 Mining46.05% 42.98% 7.49%
Alamos Gold 51.42%25.24%5.85%

44.1% of K92 Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.0% of Alamos Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 2.5% of K92 Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Alamos Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

K92 Mining has a beta of 1.722474, suggesting that its stock price is 72% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alamos Gold has a beta of 1.783973, suggesting that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Alamos Gold beats K92 Mining on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does K92 Mining compare to Lundin Gold?

K92 Mining (TSE:KNT) and Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and dividends.

K92 Mining currently has a consensus price target of C$38.00, suggesting a potential upside of 49.67%. Lundin Gold has a consensus price target of C$100.62, suggesting a potential upside of 13.78%. Given K92 Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe K92 Mining is more favorable than Lundin Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
K92 Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33
Lundin Gold
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Lundin Gold has higher revenue and earnings than K92 Mining. K92 Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
K92 MiningC$686.93M9.06C$53.92MC$1.2919.68
Lundin GoldC$1.99B10.72C$215.94MC$3.7723.46

44.1% of K92 Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.1% of Lundin Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 2.5% of K92 Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

K92 Mining has a net margin of 46.05% compared to Lundin Gold's net margin of 45.73%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 68.29% beat K92 Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
K92 Mining46.05% 42.98% 7.49%
Lundin Gold 45.73%68.29%17.59%

K92 Mining has a beta of 1.722474, meaning that its share price is 72% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.56545, meaning that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, K92 Mining had 6 more articles in the media than Lundin Gold. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for K92 Mining and 0 mentions for Lundin Gold. K92 Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.08 beat Lundin Gold's score of 0.00 indicating that K92 Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
K92 Mining Neutral
Lundin Gold Neutral

Summary

K92 Mining beats Lundin Gold on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does K92 Mining compare to Endeavour Mining?

Endeavour Mining (TSE:EDV) and K92 Mining (TSE:KNT) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Endeavour Mining presently has a consensus price target of C$99.50, suggesting a potential upside of 21.95%. K92 Mining has a consensus price target of C$38.00, suggesting a potential upside of 49.67%. Given K92 Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe K92 Mining is more favorable than Endeavour Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Endeavour Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
K92 Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33

59.4% of Endeavour Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.1% of K92 Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 19.1% of Endeavour Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of K92 Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

K92 Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Endeavour Mining. K92 Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Endeavour Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Endeavour MiningC$4.54B4.34-C$239.30MC$3.4823.45
K92 MiningC$686.93M9.06C$53.92MC$1.2919.68

K92 Mining has a net margin of 46.05% compared to Endeavour Mining's net margin of 18.88%. K92 Mining's return on equity of 42.98% beat Endeavour Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Endeavour Mining18.88% 27.75% 3.54%
K92 Mining 46.05%42.98%7.49%

In the previous week, K92 Mining had 5 more articles in the media than Endeavour Mining. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for K92 Mining and 1 mentions for Endeavour Mining. Endeavour Mining's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat K92 Mining's score of 0.08 indicating that Endeavour Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Endeavour Mining
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
K92 Mining
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Endeavour Mining has a beta of 1.551863, meaning that its share price is 55% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, K92 Mining has a beta of 1.722474, meaning that its share price is 72% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

K92 Mining beats Endeavour Mining on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does K92 Mining compare to Equinox Gold?

Equinox Gold (TSE:EQX) and K92 Mining (TSE:KNT) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

Equinox Gold has higher revenue and earnings than K92 Mining. K92 Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Equinox Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Equinox GoldC$2.41B5.80C$214.45MC$0.9019.70
K92 MiningC$686.93M9.06C$53.92MC$1.2919.68

K92 Mining has a net margin of 46.05% compared to Equinox Gold's net margin of 21.78%. K92 Mining's return on equity of 42.98% beat Equinox Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Equinox Gold21.78% 10.88% 0.47%
K92 Mining 46.05%42.98%7.49%

In the previous week, K92 Mining had 3 more articles in the media than Equinox Gold. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for K92 Mining and 3 mentions for Equinox Gold. Equinox Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat K92 Mining's score of 0.08 indicating that Equinox Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Equinox Gold
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
K92 Mining
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Equinox Gold currently has a consensus target price of C$25.86, indicating a potential upside of 45.84%. K92 Mining has a consensus target price of C$38.00, indicating a potential upside of 49.67%. Given K92 Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe K92 Mining is more favorable than Equinox Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Equinox Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
K92 Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33

45.0% of Equinox Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.1% of K92 Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.4% of Equinox Gold shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of K92 Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Equinox Gold has a beta of 2.869244, indicating that its stock price is 187% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, K92 Mining has a beta of 1.722474, indicating that its stock price is 72% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

K92 Mining beats Equinox Gold on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does K92 Mining compare to IAMGOLD?

K92 Mining (TSE:KNT) and IAMGOLD (TSE:IMG) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

44.1% of K92 Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.3% of IAMGOLD shares are held by institutional investors. 2.5% of K92 Mining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of IAMGOLD shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

IAMGOLD has higher revenue and earnings than K92 Mining. IAMGOLD is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than K92 Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
K92 MiningC$686.93M9.06C$53.92MC$1.2919.68
IAMGOLDC$3.41B4.05C$557.06MC$1.7113.97

K92 Mining has a net margin of 46.05% compared to IAMGOLD's net margin of 29.53%. K92 Mining's return on equity of 42.98% beat IAMGOLD's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
K92 Mining46.05% 42.98% 7.49%
IAMGOLD 29.53%26.05%2.54%

In the previous week, K92 Mining had 6 more articles in the media than IAMGOLD. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for K92 Mining and 0 mentions for IAMGOLD. K92 Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.08 beat IAMGOLD's score of -0.80 indicating that K92 Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
K92 Mining Neutral
IAMGOLD Negative

K92 Mining currently has a consensus price target of C$38.00, suggesting a potential upside of 49.67%. IAMGOLD has a consensus price target of C$32.07, suggesting a potential upside of 34.25%. Given K92 Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe K92 Mining is more favorable than IAMGOLD.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
K92 Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33
IAMGOLD
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

K92 Mining has a beta of 1.722474, suggesting that its share price is 72% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, IAMGOLD has a beta of 2.113971, suggesting that its share price is 111% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

K92 Mining beats IAMGOLD on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get K92 Mining News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for KNT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding KNT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

KNT vs. The Competition

MetricK92 MiningGold IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$6.22BC$5.14BC$4.80BC$12.16B
Dividend YieldN/A5.71%5.01%6.20%
P/E Ratio19.6838.6123.1237.64
Price / Sales9.06220.936,750.5411.68
Price / Cash17.7722.1127.2182.29
Price / Book6.9912.546.734.50
Net IncomeC$53.92MC$6.39MC$157.11MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-2.27%-1.05%-0.51%1.38%
1 Month Performance-2.68%-1.92%-0.41%1.46%
1 Year Performance81.49%91.17%74.77%55.45%

K92 Mining Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
KNT
K92 Mining
3.2214 of 5 stars
C$25.39
+4.2%
C$38.00
+49.7%
+74.2%C$6.22BC$686.93M19.68N/A
AGI
Alamos Gold
3.9283 of 5 stars
C$54.23
+2.3%
C$76.20
+40.5%
+47.1%C$22.77BC$2.07B21.612,400
LUG
Lundin Gold
1.4002 of 5 stars
C$87.62
+2.4%
C$100.62
+14.8%
+34.0%C$21.19BC$1.99B23.241,645
EDV
Endeavour Mining
3.4153 of 5 stars
C$81.18
+1.9%
C$99.50
+22.6%
+87.2%C$19.60BC$4.54B23.333,786
EQX
Equinox Gold
4.2496 of 5 stars
C$17.05
+1.4%
C$25.86
+51.7%
+81.7%C$13.45BC$2.41B18.947,730

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:KNT) was last updated on 5/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners