Which has higher valuation & earnings, LUG or KNT?

Lundin Gold has higher revenue and earnings than K92 Mining. K92 Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Lundin Gold C$2.02B 10.98 C$215.94M C$3.85 23.81 K92 Mining C$795.83M 9.03 C$53.92M C$1.47 19.90

Is LUG or KNT more profitable?

Lundin Gold has a net margin of 46.31% compared to K92 Mining's net margin of 45.48%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 81.63% beat K92 Mining's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Lundin Gold 46.31% 81.63% 17.59% K92 Mining 45.48% 43.29% 7.49%

Does the media prefer LUG or KNT?

In the previous week, Lundin Gold had 1 more articles in the media than K92 Mining. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Lundin Gold and 1 mentions for K92 Mining. K92 Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Lundin Gold's score of -0.25 indicating that K92 Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lundin Gold 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral K92 Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher earnings & valuation, AGI or KNT?

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than K92 Mining. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than K92 Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Alamos Gold C$2.23B 9.12 C$174.87M C$2.79 17.41 K92 Mining C$795.83M 9.03 C$53.92M C$1.47 19.90

Is AGI or KNT more profitable?

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 52.85% compared to K92 Mining's net margin of 45.48%. K92 Mining's return on equity of 43.29% beat Alamos Gold's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Alamos Gold 52.85% 26.10% 5.85% K92 Mining 45.48% 43.29% 7.49%

Does the media refer more to AGI or KNT?

In the previous week, Alamos Gold had 1 more articles in the media than K92 Mining. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Alamos Gold and 1 mentions for K92 Mining. Alamos Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat K92 Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Alamos Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Alamos Gold 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive K92 Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, KNT or EDV?

K92 Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Endeavour Mining. K92 Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Endeavour Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio K92 Mining C$795.83M 9.03 C$53.92M C$1.47 19.90 Endeavour Mining C$4.75B 4.37 -C$239.30M C$3.40 25.35

Does the media favor KNT or EDV?

In the previous week, Endeavour Mining had 1 more articles in the media than K92 Mining. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Endeavour Mining and 1 mentions for K92 Mining. Endeavour Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat K92 Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Endeavour Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment K92 Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Endeavour Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, KNT or EQX?

Equinox Gold has higher revenue and earnings than K92 Mining. Equinox Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than K92 Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio K92 Mining C$795.83M 9.03 C$53.92M C$1.47 19.90 Equinox Gold C$2.90B 6.85 C$214.45M C$1.08 15.75

Is KNT or EQX more profitable?

K92 Mining has a net margin of 45.48% compared to Equinox Gold's net margin of 26.36%. K92 Mining's return on equity of 43.29% beat Equinox Gold's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets K92 Mining 45.48% 43.29% 7.49% Equinox Gold 26.36% 13.85% 0.47%

Does the media prefer KNT or EQX?

In the previous week, Equinox Gold had 3 more articles in the media than K92 Mining. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Equinox Gold and 1 mentions for K92 Mining. Equinox Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat K92 Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Equinox Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment K92 Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Equinox Gold 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate CGG or KNT?

K92 Mining has a consensus price target of C$37.20, indicating a potential upside of 27.14%. Given K92 Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe K92 Mining is more favorable than China Gold International Resources. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score China Gold International Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 K92 Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.33

K92 Mining (KNT) Competitors

C$29.26 -1.23 (-4.03%)

As of 09/23/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

KNT vs. LUG, AGI, EDV, EQX, and CGG

Should you buy K92 Mining stock or one of its competitors? K92 Mining's main competitors and comparable companies include Lundin Gold (LUG), Alamos Gold (AGI), Endeavour Mining (EDV), Equinox Gold (EQX), and China Gold International Resources (CGG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does K92 Mining compare to Lundin Gold?

Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) and K92 Mining (TSE:KNT) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and profitability.

Lundin Gold currently has a consensus price target of C$99.33, indicating a potential upside of 8.37%. K92 Mining has a consensus price target of C$37.20, indicating a potential upside of 27.14%. Given K92 Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe K92 Mining is more favorable than Lundin Gold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lundin Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
K92 Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.33

24.2% of Lundin Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.7% of K92 Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of K92 Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Lundin Gold has a net margin of 46.31% compared to K92 Mining's net margin of 45.48%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 81.63% beat K92 Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lundin Gold	46.31%	81.63%	17.59%
K92 Mining	45.48%	43.29%	7.49%

Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.643383, meaning that its share price is 64% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, K92 Mining has a beta of 1.980165, meaning that its share price is 98% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Lundin Gold had 1 more articles in the media than K92 Mining. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Lundin Gold and 1 mentions for K92 Mining. K92 Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Lundin Gold's score of -0.25 indicating that K92 Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lundin Gold	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
K92 Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Lundin Gold has higher revenue and earnings than K92 Mining. K92 Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lundin Gold	C$2.02B	10.98	C$215.94M	C$3.85	23.81
K92 Mining	C$795.83M	9.03	C$53.92M	C$1.47	19.90

Summary

Lundin Gold beats K92 Mining on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does K92 Mining compare to Alamos Gold?

Alamos Gold (TSE:AGI) and K92 Mining (TSE:KNT) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 52.85% compared to K92 Mining's net margin of 45.48%. K92 Mining's return on equity of 43.29% beat Alamos Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Alamos Gold	52.85%	26.10%	5.85%
K92 Mining	45.48%	43.29%	7.49%

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than K92 Mining. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than K92 Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Alamos Gold	C$2.23B	9.12	C$174.87M	C$2.79	17.41
K92 Mining	C$795.83M	9.03	C$53.92M	C$1.47	19.90

51.2% of Alamos Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.7% of K92 Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Alamos Gold shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of K92 Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Alamos Gold had 1 more articles in the media than K92 Mining. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Alamos Gold and 1 mentions for K92 Mining. Alamos Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat K92 Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Alamos Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Alamos Gold	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
K92 Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Alamos Gold currently has a consensus price target of C$76.67, suggesting a potential upside of 57.85%. K92 Mining has a consensus price target of C$37.20, suggesting a potential upside of 27.14%. Given Alamos Gold's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than K92 Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Alamos Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
K92 Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.33

Alamos Gold has a beta of 2.130234, suggesting that its stock price is 113% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, K92 Mining has a beta of 1.980165, suggesting that its stock price is 98% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Alamos Gold beats K92 Mining on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does K92 Mining compare to Endeavour Mining?

K92 Mining (TSE:KNT) and Endeavour Mining (TSE:EDV) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

K92 Mining presently has a consensus price target of C$37.20, suggesting a potential upside of 27.14%. Endeavour Mining has a consensus price target of C$93.50, suggesting a potential upside of 8.48%. Given K92 Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe K92 Mining is more favorable than Endeavour Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
K92 Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.33
Endeavour Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

In the previous week, Endeavour Mining had 1 more articles in the media than K92 Mining. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Endeavour Mining and 1 mentions for K92 Mining. Endeavour Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat K92 Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Endeavour Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
K92 Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Endeavour Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

K92 Mining has a net margin of 45.48% compared to Endeavour Mining's net margin of 17.62%. K92 Mining's return on equity of 43.29% beat Endeavour Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
K92 Mining	45.48%	43.29%	7.49%
Endeavour Mining	17.62%	26.17%	3.54%

42.7% of K92 Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.5% of Endeavour Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of K92 Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 19.1% of Endeavour Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

K92 Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Endeavour Mining. K92 Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Endeavour Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
K92 Mining	C$795.83M	9.03	C$53.92M	C$1.47	19.90
Endeavour Mining	C$4.75B	4.37	-C$239.30M	C$3.40	25.35

K92 Mining has a beta of 1.980165, indicating that its share price is 98% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Endeavour Mining has a beta of 1.897713, indicating that its share price is 90% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

K92 Mining beats Endeavour Mining on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does K92 Mining compare to Equinox Gold?

K92 Mining (TSE:KNT) and Equinox Gold (TSE:EQX) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and dividends.

K92 Mining has a net margin of 45.48% compared to Equinox Gold's net margin of 26.36%. K92 Mining's return on equity of 43.29% beat Equinox Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
K92 Mining	45.48%	43.29%	7.49%
Equinox Gold	26.36%	13.85%	0.47%

Equinox Gold has higher revenue and earnings than K92 Mining. Equinox Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than K92 Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
K92 Mining	C$795.83M	9.03	C$53.92M	C$1.47	19.90
Equinox Gold	C$2.90B	6.85	C$214.45M	C$1.08	15.75

K92 Mining has a beta of 1.980165, indicating that its share price is 98% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Equinox Gold has a beta of 3.350231, indicating that its share price is 235% more volatile than the broader market.

42.7% of K92 Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.0% of Equinox Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of K92 Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.4% of Equinox Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Equinox Gold had 3 more articles in the media than K92 Mining. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Equinox Gold and 1 mentions for K92 Mining. Equinox Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat K92 Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Equinox Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
K92 Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Equinox Gold	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

K92 Mining presently has a consensus price target of C$37.20, indicating a potential upside of 27.14%. Equinox Gold has a consensus price target of C$24.50, indicating a potential upside of 44.03%. Given Equinox Gold's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Equinox Gold is more favorable than K92 Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
K92 Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.33
Equinox Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.17

Summary

K92 Mining and Equinox Gold tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does K92 Mining compare to China Gold International Resources?

China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) and K92 Mining (TSE:KNT) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 46.95% compared to K92 Mining's net margin of 45.48%. K92 Mining's return on equity of 43.29% beat China Gold International Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
China Gold International Resources	46.95%	32.43%	-1.06%
K92 Mining	45.48%	43.29%	7.49%

K92 Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than China Gold International Resources. K92 Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
China Gold International Resources	C$1.64B	9.84	-C$15.76M	C$1.95	20.90
K92 Mining	C$795.83M	9.03	C$53.92M	C$1.47	19.90

22.1% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.7% of K92 Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of K92 Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, K92 Mining had 1 more articles in the media than China Gold International Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for K92 Mining and 0 mentions for China Gold International Resources. China Gold International Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled K92 Mining'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
China Gold International Resources	Neutral
K92 Mining	Neutral

K92 Mining has a consensus price target of C$37.20, indicating a potential upside of 27.14%. Given K92 Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe K92 Mining is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
China Gold International Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
K92 Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.33

China Gold International Resources has a beta of 2.086641, meaning that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, K92 Mining has a beta of 1.980165, meaning that its stock price is 98% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

K92 Mining beats China Gold International Resources on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get K92 Mining News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding KNT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

KNT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	K92 Mining	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$7.49B	C$3.96B	C$4.94B	C$12.84B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.21%	4.71%	6.27%
P/E Ratio	19.90	25.76	26.10	40.36
Price / Sales	9.03	29,668.65	17,625.36	9.35
Price / Cash	17.77	29.47	26.89	82.29
Price / Book	7.37	12.19	10.13	4.69
Net Income	C$53.92M	C$127.53M	C$158.14M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	0.97%	0.85%	0.51%	0.01%
1 Month Performance	-4.85%	-2.23%	-2.16%	-2.14%
1 Year Performance	79.62%	30.38%	25.48%	20.17%

K92 Mining Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
KNT K92 Mining	2.5047 of 5 stars	C$29.26 -4.0%	C$37.20 +27.1%	+69.5%	C$7.49B	C$795.83M	19.90	N/A	Gap Down
LUG Lundin Gold	1.8963 of 5 stars	C$90.28 -1.0%	C$99.33 +10.0%	+1.9%	C$21.83B	C$2.02B	23.45	1,893	Gap Down
AGI Alamos Gold	3.2871 of 5 stars	C$48.18 -1.5%	C$77.33 +60.5%	+3.8%	C$20.17B	C$2.23B	17.27	2,400	News Coverage Analyst Forecast Gap Up
EDV Endeavour Mining	2.1831 of 5 stars	C$83.03 -0.4%	C$93.50 +12.6%	+49.2%	C$20.01B	C$4.75B	24.42	5,659	News Coverage
EQX Equinox Gold	3.4334 of 5 stars	C$16.17 -1.9%	C$24.50 +51.5%	+14.2%	C$18.88B	C$2.90B	14.97	3,692	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:KNT) was last updated on 9/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

K92 Mining (KNT) Competitors

KNT vs. LUG, AGI, EDV, EQX, and CGG

How does K92 Mining compare to Lundin Gold?

Summary

How does K92 Mining compare to Alamos Gold?

Summary

How does K92 Mining compare to Endeavour Mining?

Summary

How does K92 Mining compare to Equinox Gold?

Summary

How does K92 Mining compare to China Gold International Resources?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

KNT vs. The Competition

K92 Mining Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

K92 Mining (KNT) Competitors

KNT vs. LUG, AGI, EDV, EQX, and CGG

How does K92 Mining compare to Lundin Gold?

Do analysts rate LUG or KNT?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in LUG or KNT?

Is LUG or KNT more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, LUG or KNT?

Does the media prefer LUG or KNT?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, LUG or KNT?

Summary

How does K92 Mining compare to Alamos Gold?

Is AGI or KNT more profitable?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, AGI or KNT?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in AGI or KNT?

Does the media refer more to AGI or KNT?

Do analysts rate AGI or KNT?

Which has more risk & volatility, AGI or KNT?

Summary

How does K92 Mining compare to Endeavour Mining?

Do analysts recommend KNT or EDV?

Does the media favor KNT or EDV?

Is KNT or EDV more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in KNT or EDV?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, KNT or EDV?

Which has more volatility and risk, KNT or EDV?

Summary

How does K92 Mining compare to Equinox Gold?

Is KNT or EQX more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, KNT or EQX?

Which has more risk & volatility, KNT or EQX?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in KNT or EQX?

Does the media prefer KNT or EQX?

Do analysts prefer KNT or EQX?

Summary

How does K92 Mining compare to China Gold International Resources?

Is CGG or KNT more profitable?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, CGG or KNT?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in CGG or KNT?

Does the media refer more to CGG or KNT?

Do analysts rate CGG or KNT?

Which has more volatility & risk, CGG or KNT?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

KNT vs. The Competition

K92 Mining Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools