Go Pro

OceanaGold (OGC) Competitors

OceanaGold logo
C$33.07 +1.87 (+5.99%)
As of 07/21/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

OGC vs. PAAS, LUG, AGI, EDV, and IMG

Should you buy OceanaGold stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares OceanaGold with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with OceanaGold include Pan American Silver (PAAS), Lundin Gold (LUG), Alamos Gold (AGI), Endeavour Mining (EDV), and IAMGOLD (IMG). These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does OceanaGold compare to Pan American Silver?

OceanaGold (TSE:OGC) and Pan American Silver (TSE:PAAS) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and valuation.

OceanaGold presently has a consensus price target of C$60.13, indicating a potential upside of 81.81%. Pan American Silver has a consensus price target of C$84.40, indicating a potential upside of 34.54%. Given OceanaGold's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe OceanaGold is more favorable than Pan American Silver.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
OceanaGold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Pan American Silver
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

OceanaGold has a beta of 2.713123, indicating that its stock price is 171% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan American Silver has a beta of 2.01571, indicating that its stock price is 102% more volatile than the broader market.

49.7% of OceanaGold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.6% of Pan American Silver shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of OceanaGold shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Pan American Silver shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

OceanaGold pays an annual dividend of C$0.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Pan American Silver pays an annual dividend of C$0.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. OceanaGold pays out 5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pan American Silver pays out 17.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

OceanaGold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pan American Silver. OceanaGold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pan American Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
OceanaGoldC$2.25B3.29C$42.98MC$3.2810.08
Pan American SilverC$4B6.61-C$33.47MC$3.1719.79

OceanaGold has a net margin of 33.78% compared to Pan American Silver's net margin of 31.69%. OceanaGold's return on equity of 34.87% beat Pan American Silver's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
OceanaGold33.78% 34.87% 2.63%
Pan American Silver 31.69%19.65%0.43%

In the previous week, OceanaGold had 4 more articles in the media than Pan American Silver. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for OceanaGold and 0 mentions for Pan American Silver. Pan American Silver's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat OceanaGold's score of -0.50 indicating that Pan American Silver is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
OceanaGold Negative
Pan American Silver Positive

Summary

OceanaGold beats Pan American Silver on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does OceanaGold compare to Lundin Gold?

OceanaGold (TSE:OGC) and Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and profitability.

Lundin Gold has lower revenue, but higher earnings than OceanaGold. OceanaGold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
OceanaGoldC$2.25B3.29C$42.98MC$3.2810.08
Lundin GoldC$1.99B9.59C$215.94MC$3.7720.98

OceanaGold pays an annual dividend of C$0.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Lundin Gold pays an annual dividend of C$3.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. OceanaGold pays out 5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lundin Gold pays out 84.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

49.7% of OceanaGold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.3% of Lundin Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of OceanaGold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lundin Gold has a net margin of 45.73% compared to OceanaGold's net margin of 33.78%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 68.29% beat OceanaGold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
OceanaGold33.78% 34.87% 2.63%
Lundin Gold 45.73%68.29%17.59%

In the previous week, Lundin Gold had 3 more articles in the media than OceanaGold. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Lundin Gold and 4 mentions for OceanaGold. Lundin Gold's average media sentiment score of -0.01 beat OceanaGold's score of -0.50 indicating that Lundin Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
OceanaGold
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
Lundin Gold
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

OceanaGold presently has a consensus target price of C$60.13, suggesting a potential upside of 81.81%. Lundin Gold has a consensus target price of C$102.36, suggesting a potential upside of 29.41%. Given OceanaGold's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe OceanaGold is more favorable than Lundin Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
OceanaGold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Lundin Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

OceanaGold has a beta of 2.713123, meaning that its stock price is 171% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.636773, meaning that its stock price is 64% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Lundin Gold beats OceanaGold on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does OceanaGold compare to Alamos Gold?

Alamos Gold (TSE:AGI) and OceanaGold (TSE:OGC) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and earnings.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 1.885175, suggesting that its share price is 89% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, OceanaGold has a beta of 2.713123, suggesting that its share price is 171% more volatile than the broader market.

Alamos Gold currently has a consensus price target of C$76.20, indicating a potential upside of 82.82%. OceanaGold has a consensus price target of C$60.13, indicating a potential upside of 81.81%. Given Alamos Gold's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than OceanaGold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Alamos Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
OceanaGold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Alamos Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. OceanaGold pays an annual dividend of C$0.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Alamos Gold pays out 4.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. OceanaGold pays out 5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

53.8% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.7% of OceanaGold shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of OceanaGold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Alamos Gold had 2 more articles in the media than OceanaGold. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Alamos Gold and 4 mentions for OceanaGold. Alamos Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat OceanaGold's score of -0.50 indicating that Alamos Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Alamos Gold
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
OceanaGold
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

Alamos Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than OceanaGold. OceanaGold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alamos Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alamos GoldC$2.07B8.45C$174.87MC$2.5116.61
OceanaGoldC$2.25B3.29C$42.98MC$3.2810.08

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 51.42% compared to OceanaGold's net margin of 33.78%. OceanaGold's return on equity of 34.87% beat Alamos Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alamos Gold51.42% 25.24% 5.85%
OceanaGold 33.78%34.87%2.63%

Summary

Alamos Gold beats OceanaGold on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does OceanaGold compare to Endeavour Mining?

OceanaGold (TSE:OGC) and Endeavour Mining (TSE:EDV) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

OceanaGold pays an annual dividend of C$0.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Endeavour Mining pays an annual dividend of C$1.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. OceanaGold pays out 5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Endeavour Mining pays out 41.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

OceanaGold has a beta of 2.713123, meaning that its share price is 171% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Endeavour Mining has a beta of 1.821542, meaning that its share price is 82% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Endeavour Mining had 2 more articles in the media than OceanaGold. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Endeavour Mining and 4 mentions for OceanaGold. Endeavour Mining's average media sentiment score of -0.28 beat OceanaGold's score of -0.50 indicating that Endeavour Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
OceanaGold
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
Endeavour Mining
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

OceanaGold currently has a consensus target price of C$60.13, indicating a potential upside of 81.81%. Endeavour Mining has a consensus target price of C$93.50, indicating a potential upside of 39.43%. Given OceanaGold's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe OceanaGold is more favorable than Endeavour Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
OceanaGold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Endeavour Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

OceanaGold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Endeavour Mining. OceanaGold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Endeavour Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
OceanaGoldC$2.25B3.29C$42.98MC$3.2810.08
Endeavour MiningC$4.54B3.56-C$239.30MC$3.4819.27

OceanaGold has a net margin of 33.78% compared to Endeavour Mining's net margin of 18.88%. OceanaGold's return on equity of 34.87% beat Endeavour Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
OceanaGold33.78% 34.87% 2.63%
Endeavour Mining 18.88%27.75%3.54%

49.7% of OceanaGold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.5% of Endeavour Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of OceanaGold shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.1% of Endeavour Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Endeavour Mining beats OceanaGold on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does OceanaGold compare to IAMGOLD?

IAMGOLD (TSE:IMG) and OceanaGold (TSE:OGC) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

OceanaGold has a net margin of 33.78% compared to IAMGOLD's net margin of 29.53%. OceanaGold's return on equity of 34.87% beat IAMGOLD's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
IAMGOLD29.53% 26.05% 2.54%
OceanaGold 33.78%34.87%2.63%

IAMGOLD has a beta of 2.155134, indicating that its share price is 116% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, OceanaGold has a beta of 2.713123, indicating that its share price is 171% more volatile than the broader market.

IAMGOLD presently has a consensus target price of C$32.07, indicating a potential upside of 52.14%. OceanaGold has a consensus target price of C$60.13, indicating a potential upside of 81.81%. Given OceanaGold's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe OceanaGold is more favorable than IAMGOLD.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
IAMGOLD
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
OceanaGold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

IAMGOLD has higher revenue and earnings than OceanaGold. OceanaGold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IAMGOLD, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
IAMGOLDC$3.41B3.58C$557.06MC$1.7112.33
OceanaGoldC$2.25B3.29C$42.98MC$3.2810.08

In the previous week, IAMGOLD and IAMGOLD both had 4 articles in the media. IAMGOLD's average media sentiment score of 0.27 beat OceanaGold's score of -0.50 indicating that IAMGOLD is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
IAMGOLD
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
OceanaGold
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

54.3% of IAMGOLD shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.7% of OceanaGold shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of IAMGOLD shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of OceanaGold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

OceanaGold beats IAMGOLD on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get OceanaGold News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for OGC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding OGC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

OGC vs. The Competition

MetricOceanaGoldGold IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$7.40BC$4.67BC$4.46BC$12.44B
Dividend Yield1.07%5.66%5.04%6.18%
P/E Ratio10.0836.2121.0336.83
Price / Sales3.29204.855,736.999.63
Price / CashN/A22.1126.3682.29
Price / Book2.9810.688.594.46
Net IncomeC$42.98MC$6.39MC$157.08MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance0.09%-0.64%-0.21%0.10%
1 Month Performance-11.13%-4.45%-4.04%-0.30%
1 Year Performance66.35%42.46%35.80%30.62%

OceanaGold Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
OGC
OceanaGold
3.0752 of 5 stars
C$33.07
+6.0%
C$60.13
+81.8%
+72.1%C$7.40BC$2.25B10.08N/A
PAAS
Pan American Silver
3.892 of 5 stars
C$61.21
+1.3%
C$84.40
+37.9%
+55.5%C$25.79BC$4B19.3113,000
LUG
Lundin Gold
3.2647 of 5 stars
C$76.92
+0.3%
C$99.67
+29.6%
+21.1%C$18.60BC$1.99B20.401,645
AGI
Alamos Gold
3.292 of 5 stars
C$41.28
+1.1%
C$76.20
+84.6%
+18.3%C$17.34BC$2.07B16.452,400
EDV
Endeavour Mining
3.563 of 5 stars
C$67.47
+0.4%
C$93.50
+38.6%
+59.3%C$16.26BC$4.54B19.393,786

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:OGC) was last updated on 7/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners