Which has better valuation & earnings, LUG or WPM?

Wheaton Precious Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Lundin Gold. Lundin Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wheaton Precious Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Lundin Gold C$1.99B 9.52 C$215.94M C$3.77 20.82 Wheaton Precious Metals C$2.75B 25.22 C$426.03M C$3.96 38.53

Does the media prefer LUG or WPM?

In the previous week, Wheaton Precious Metals had 10 more articles in the media than Lundin Gold. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Wheaton Precious Metals and 2 mentions for Lundin Gold. Wheaton Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.15 beat Lundin Gold's score of -0.46 indicating that Wheaton Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lundin Gold 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Wheaton Precious Metals 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, FNV or LUG?

Lundin Gold has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Franco-Nevada. Lundin Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Franco-Nevada C$2.11B 27.32 -C$442.97M C$7.10 42.01 Lundin Gold C$1.99B 9.52 C$215.94M C$3.77 20.82

Which has better earnings and valuation, LUG or K?

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Lundin Gold. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Lundin Gold C$1.99B 9.52 C$215.94M C$3.77 20.82 Kinross Gold C$8.47B 4.56 C$522.52M C$2.63 12.29

Is LUG or K more profitable?

Lundin Gold has a net margin of 45.73% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of 37.56%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 68.29% beat Kinross Gold's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Lundin Gold 45.73% 68.29% 17.59% Kinross Gold 37.56% 35.91% 5.16%

Does the media refer more to LUG or K?

In the previous week, Kinross Gold had 10 more articles in the media than Lundin Gold. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Kinross Gold and 2 mentions for Lundin Gold. Kinross Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Lundin Gold's score of -0.46 indicating that Kinross Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lundin Gold 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Kinross Gold 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher earnings & valuation, AGI or LUG?

Lundin Gold has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Alamos Gold. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Alamos Gold C$2.23B 7.32 C$174.87M C$2.79 13.96 Lundin Gold C$1.99B 9.52 C$215.94M C$3.77 20.82

Is AGI or LUG more profitable?

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 52.85% compared to Lundin Gold's net margin of 45.73%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 68.29% beat Alamos Gold's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Alamos Gold 52.85% 26.10% 5.85% Lundin Gold 45.73% 68.29% 17.59%

Does the media prefer AGI or LUG?

In the previous week, Alamos Gold had 3 more articles in the media than Lundin Gold. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Alamos Gold and 2 mentions for Lundin Gold. Alamos Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.06 beat Lundin Gold's score of -0.46 indicating that Alamos Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Alamos Gold 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Lundin Gold 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Lundin Gold (LUG) Competitors

C$78.49 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 07/31/2026 04:25 PM Eastern

Compare

LUG vs. WPM, FNV, K, PAAS, and AGI

Should you buy Lundin Gold stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Lundin Gold with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Lundin Gold include Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM), Franco-Nevada (FNV), Kinross Gold (K), Pan American Silver (PAAS), and Alamos Gold (AGI).

How does Lundin Gold compare to Wheaton Precious Metals?

Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) and Wheaton Precious Metals (TSE:WPM) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Wheaton Precious Metals had 10 more articles in the media than Lundin Gold. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Wheaton Precious Metals and 2 mentions for Lundin Gold. Wheaton Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.15 beat Lundin Gold's score of -0.46 indicating that Wheaton Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lundin Gold	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Wheaton Precious Metals	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Lundin Gold presently has a consensus price target of C$102.17, indicating a potential upside of 30.17%. Wheaton Precious Metals has a consensus price target of C$199.00, indicating a potential upside of 30.51%. Given Wheaton Precious Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Wheaton Precious Metals is more favorable than Lundin Gold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lundin Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Wheaton Precious Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.13

Wheaton Precious Metals has a net margin of 65.55% compared to Lundin Gold's net margin of 45.73%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 68.29% beat Wheaton Precious Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lundin Gold	45.73%	68.29%	17.59%
Wheaton Precious Metals	65.55%	21.32%	5.35%

Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.636773, meaning that its share price is 64% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Wheaton Precious Metals has a beta of 1.395244, meaning that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

24.4% of Lundin Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.2% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Wheaton Precious Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Lundin Gold. Lundin Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wheaton Precious Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lundin Gold	C$1.99B	9.52	C$215.94M	C$3.77	20.82
Wheaton Precious Metals	C$2.75B	25.22	C$426.03M	C$3.96	38.53

Lundin Gold pays an annual dividend of C$3.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Wheaton Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of C$0.69 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Lundin Gold pays out 84.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Wheaton Precious Metals pays out 17.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Wheaton Precious Metals beats Lundin Gold on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lundin Gold compare to Franco-Nevada?

Franco-Nevada (TSE:FNV) and Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Franco-Nevada has a net margin of 65.14% compared to Lundin Gold's net margin of 45.73%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 68.29% beat Franco-Nevada's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Franco-Nevada	65.14%	18.67%	-4.57%
Lundin Gold	45.73%	68.29%	17.59%

Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of C$1.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Lundin Gold pays an annual dividend of C$3.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Franco-Nevada pays out 22.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lundin Gold pays out 84.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.963495, indicating that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.636773, indicating that its share price is 64% more volatile than the broader market.

63.0% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.4% of Lundin Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lundin Gold has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Franco-Nevada. Lundin Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Franco-Nevada	C$2.11B	27.32	-C$442.97M	C$7.10	42.01
Lundin Gold	C$1.99B	9.52	C$215.94M	C$3.77	20.82

In the previous week, Lundin Gold had 2 more articles in the media than Franco-Nevada. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Lundin Gold and 0 mentions for Franco-Nevada. Franco-Nevada's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Lundin Gold's score of -0.46 indicating that Franco-Nevada is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Franco-Nevada	Neutral
Lundin Gold	Neutral

Franco-Nevada presently has a consensus price target of C$356.56, indicating a potential upside of 19.55%. Lundin Gold has a consensus price target of C$102.17, indicating a potential upside of 30.17%. Given Lundin Gold's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Lundin Gold is more favorable than Franco-Nevada.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Franco-Nevada	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.60
Lundin Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Franco-Nevada beats Lundin Gold on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lundin Gold compare to Kinross Gold?

Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) and Kinross Gold (TSE:K) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Lundin Gold pays an annual dividend of C$3.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Lundin Gold pays out 84.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kinross Gold pays out 5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

24.4% of Lundin Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.5% of Kinross Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Kinross Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Lundin Gold presently has a consensus target price of C$102.17, suggesting a potential upside of 30.17%. Kinross Gold has a consensus target price of C$47.36, suggesting a potential upside of 46.53%. Given Kinross Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than Lundin Gold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lundin Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Kinross Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.13

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Lundin Gold. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lundin Gold	C$1.99B	9.52	C$215.94M	C$3.77	20.82
Kinross Gold	C$8.47B	4.56	C$522.52M	C$2.63	12.29

Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.636773, indicating that its share price is 64% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kinross Gold has a beta of 1.488315, indicating that its share price is 49% more volatile than the broader market.

Lundin Gold has a net margin of 45.73% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of 37.56%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 68.29% beat Kinross Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lundin Gold	45.73%	68.29%	17.59%
Kinross Gold	37.56%	35.91%	5.16%

In the previous week, Kinross Gold had 10 more articles in the media than Lundin Gold. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Kinross Gold and 2 mentions for Lundin Gold. Kinross Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Lundin Gold's score of -0.46 indicating that Kinross Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lundin Gold	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Kinross Gold	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Kinross Gold beats Lundin Gold on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lundin Gold compare to Pan American Silver?

Pan American Silver (TSE:PAAS) and Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Pan American Silver has a beta of 2.01571, meaning that its stock price is 102% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.636773, meaning that its stock price is 64% more volatile than the broader market.

Lundin Gold has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pan American Silver. Pan American Silver is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pan American Silver	C$4B	6.36	-C$33.47M	C$3.17	19.04
Lundin Gold	C$1.99B	9.52	C$215.94M	C$3.77	20.82

Pan American Silver pays an annual dividend of C$0.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Lundin Gold pays an annual dividend of C$3.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Pan American Silver pays out 17.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lundin Gold pays out 84.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Lundin Gold has a net margin of 45.73% compared to Pan American Silver's net margin of 31.69%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 68.29% beat Pan American Silver's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pan American Silver	31.69%	19.65%	0.43%
Lundin Gold	45.73%	68.29%	17.59%

42.5% of Pan American Silver shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.4% of Lundin Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Pan American Silver shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pan American Silver currently has a consensus target price of C$84.40, suggesting a potential upside of 39.83%. Lundin Gold has a consensus target price of C$102.17, suggesting a potential upside of 30.17%. Given Pan American Silver's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Pan American Silver is more favorable than Lundin Gold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pan American Silver	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Lundin Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Lundin Gold had 2 more articles in the media than Pan American Silver. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Lundin Gold and 0 mentions for Pan American Silver. Pan American Silver's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Lundin Gold's score of -0.46 indicating that Pan American Silver is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Pan American Silver	Neutral
Lundin Gold	Neutral

Summary

Lundin Gold beats Pan American Silver on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lundin Gold compare to Alamos Gold?

Alamos Gold (TSE:AGI) and Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk and earnings.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 1.885175, suggesting that its share price is 89% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.636773, suggesting that its share price is 64% more volatile than the broader market.

Alamos Gold currently has a consensus target price of C$74.70, suggesting a potential upside of 91.74%. Lundin Gold has a consensus target price of C$102.17, suggesting a potential upside of 30.17%. Given Alamos Gold's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than Lundin Gold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Alamos Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Lundin Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Lundin Gold has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Alamos Gold. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Alamos Gold	C$2.23B	7.32	C$174.87M	C$2.79	13.96
Lundin Gold	C$1.99B	9.52	C$215.94M	C$3.77	20.82

In the previous week, Alamos Gold had 3 more articles in the media than Lundin Gold. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Alamos Gold and 2 mentions for Lundin Gold. Alamos Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.06 beat Lundin Gold's score of -0.46 indicating that Alamos Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Alamos Gold	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Lundin Gold	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Alamos Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Lundin Gold pays an annual dividend of C$3.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Alamos Gold pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lundin Gold pays out 84.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 52.85% compared to Lundin Gold's net margin of 45.73%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 68.29% beat Alamos Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Alamos Gold	52.85%	26.10%	5.85%
Lundin Gold	45.73%	68.29%	17.59%

54.1% of Alamos Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.4% of Lundin Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Alamos Gold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Alamos Gold beats Lundin Gold on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Lundin Gold News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LUG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

LUG vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Lundin Gold	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$18.98B	C$3.48B	C$4.55B	C$12.25B
Dividend Yield	7.02%	5.29%	4.76%	6.20%
P/E Ratio	20.82	20.63	19.53	33.59
Price / Sales	9.52	8,453.08	5,025.42	9.16
Price / Cash	10.81	26.27	24.35	82.29
Price / Book	13.92	9.69	8.23	4.33
Net Income	C$215.94M	C$122.62M	C$155.10M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-3.42%	-0.61%	-0.32%	-0.53%
1 Month Performance	-5.88%	-4.25%	-3.06%	-1.72%
1 Year Performance	20.79%	48.23%	38.74%	32.66%

Lundin Gold Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
LUG Lundin Gold	2.9183 of 5 stars	C$78.49 flat	C$102.17 +30.2%	+20.8%	C$18.98B	C$1.99B	20.82	1,645
WPM Wheaton Precious Metals	3.0215 of 5 stars	C$155.02 -2.0%	C$205.63 +32.6%	+20.0%	C$70.40B	C$2.75B	39.18	40
FNV Franco-Nevada	1.7402 of 5 stars	C$297.40 -1.8%	C$356.56 +19.9%	+33.8%	C$57.36B	C$2.11B	41.89	40
K Kinross Gold	3.9299 of 5 stars	C$33.15 -1.8%	C$49.29 +48.7%	+44.6%	C$39.58B	C$7.96B	14.11	30,000	Earnings Report Analyst Upgrade
PAAS Pan American Silver	3.0944 of 5 stars	C$60.90 -2.2%	C$84.40 +38.6%	+61.9%	C$25.66B	C$4B	19.21	13,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:LUG) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Lundin Gold (LUG) Competitors

LUG vs. WPM, FNV, K, PAAS, and AGI

How does Lundin Gold compare to Wheaton Precious Metals?

Summary

How does Lundin Gold compare to Franco-Nevada?

Summary

How does Lundin Gold compare to Kinross Gold?

Summary

How does Lundin Gold compare to Pan American Silver?

Summary

How does Lundin Gold compare to Alamos Gold?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LUG vs. The Competition

Lundin Gold Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Lundin Gold (LUG) Competitors

LUG vs. WPM, FNV, K, PAAS, and AGI

How does Lundin Gold compare to Wheaton Precious Metals?

Does the media prefer LUG or WPM?

Do analysts rate LUG or WPM?

Is LUG or WPM more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, LUG or WPM?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in LUG or WPM?

Which has better valuation & earnings, LUG or WPM?

Is LUG or WPM a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Lundin Gold compare to Franco-Nevada?

Is FNV or LUG more profitable?

Is FNV or LUG a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility and risk, FNV or LUG?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in FNV or LUG?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, FNV or LUG?

Does the media refer more to FNV or LUG?

Do analysts prefer FNV or LUG?

Summary

How does Lundin Gold compare to Kinross Gold?

Is LUG or K a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in LUG or K?

Do analysts prefer LUG or K?

Which has better earnings and valuation, LUG or K?

Which has more volatility and risk, LUG or K?

Is LUG or K more profitable?

Does the media refer more to LUG or K?

Summary

How does Lundin Gold compare to Pan American Silver?

Which has more volatility and risk, PAAS or LUG?

Which has better earnings and valuation, PAAS or LUG?

Is PAAS or LUG a better dividend stock?

Is PAAS or LUG more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of PAAS or LUG?

Do analysts rate PAAS or LUG?

Does the media favor PAAS or LUG?

Summary

How does Lundin Gold compare to Alamos Gold?

Which has more risk and volatility, AGI or LUG?

Do analysts recommend AGI or LUG?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, AGI or LUG?

Does the media prefer AGI or LUG?

Is AGI or LUG a better dividend stock?

Is AGI or LUG more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of AGI or LUG?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LUG vs. The Competition

Lundin Gold Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools