Go Pro
→ The REAL Reason Trump is Invading Iran (From Banyan Hill Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free LUG Stock Alerts

Lundin Gold (LUG) Competitors

Lundin Gold logo
C$78.23 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 07/10/2026 04:16 PM Eastern
Compare

LUG vs. WPM, FNV, K, PAAS, and AGI

Should you buy Lundin Gold stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Lundin Gold with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Lundin Gold include Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM), Franco-Nevada (FNV), Kinross Gold (K), Pan American Silver (PAAS), and Alamos Gold (AGI). These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Lundin Gold compare to Wheaton Precious Metals?

Wheaton Precious Metals (TSE:WPM) and Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Wheaton Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of C$0.69 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Lundin Gold pays an annual dividend of C$3.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Wheaton Precious Metals pays out 17.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lundin Gold pays out 84.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Wheaton Precious Metals currently has a consensus price target of C$205.63, indicating a potential upside of 31.95%. Lundin Gold has a consensus price target of C$99.67, indicating a potential upside of 27.40%. Given Wheaton Precious Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Wheaton Precious Metals is more favorable than Lundin Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Wheaton Precious Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.13
Lundin Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

63.5% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.5% of Lundin Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Wheaton Precious Metals has a beta of 1.395244, suggesting that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.636773, suggesting that its share price is 64% more volatile than the broader market.

Wheaton Precious Metals has a net margin of 65.55% compared to Lundin Gold's net margin of 45.73%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 68.29% beat Wheaton Precious Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wheaton Precious Metals65.55% 21.32% 5.35%
Lundin Gold 45.73%68.29%17.59%

Wheaton Precious Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Lundin Gold. Lundin Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wheaton Precious Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wheaton Precious MetalsC$2.75B25.77C$426.03MC$3.9639.38
Lundin GoldC$1.99B9.49C$215.94MC$3.7720.75

In the previous week, Lundin Gold had 2 more articles in the media than Wheaton Precious Metals. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Lundin Gold and 2 mentions for Wheaton Precious Metals. Wheaton Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.53 beat Lundin Gold's score of -0.25 indicating that Wheaton Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Wheaton Precious Metals
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Lundin Gold
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Wheaton Precious Metals beats Lundin Gold on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lundin Gold compare to Franco-Nevada?

Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) and Franco-Nevada (TSE:FNV) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Lundin Gold currently has a consensus price target of C$99.67, suggesting a potential upside of 27.40%. Franco-Nevada has a consensus price target of C$355.44, suggesting a potential upside of 22.18%. Given Lundin Gold's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Lundin Gold is more favorable than Franco-Nevada.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lundin Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Franco-Nevada
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.60

Lundin Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Franco-Nevada. Lundin Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lundin GoldC$1.99B9.49C$215.94MC$3.7720.75
Franco-NevadaC$2.11B26.65-C$442.97MC$7.1040.97

Lundin Gold pays an annual dividend of C$3.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of C$1.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Lundin Gold pays out 84.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Franco-Nevada pays out 22.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

24.5% of Lundin Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.1% of Franco-Nevada shares are owned by institutional investors. 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Franco-Nevada shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.636773, indicating that its share price is 64% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.963495, indicating that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

Franco-Nevada has a net margin of 65.14% compared to Lundin Gold's net margin of 45.73%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 68.29% beat Franco-Nevada's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lundin Gold45.73% 68.29% 17.59%
Franco-Nevada 65.14%18.67%-4.57%

In the previous week, Lundin Gold had 4 more articles in the media than Franco-Nevada. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Lundin Gold and 0 mentions for Franco-Nevada. Franco-Nevada's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Lundin Gold's score of -0.25 indicating that Franco-Nevada is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lundin Gold Neutral
Franco-Nevada Neutral

Summary

Franco-Nevada beats Lundin Gold on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lundin Gold compare to Kinross Gold?

Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) and Kinross Gold (TSE:K) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.636773, indicating that its stock price is 64% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kinross Gold has a beta of 1.488315, indicating that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the broader market.

24.5% of Lundin Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.4% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Lundin Gold pays an annual dividend of C$3.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Lundin Gold pays out 84.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kinross Gold pays out 5.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Lundin Gold had 1 more articles in the media than Kinross Gold. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Lundin Gold and 3 mentions for Kinross Gold. Lundin Gold's average media sentiment score of -0.25 beat Kinross Gold's score of -0.33 indicating that Lundin Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lundin Gold
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Kinross Gold
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Lundin Gold currently has a consensus target price of C$99.67, suggesting a potential upside of 27.40%. Kinross Gold has a consensus target price of C$50.36, suggesting a potential upside of 47.46%. Given Kinross Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than Lundin Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lundin Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Kinross Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.13

Lundin Gold has a net margin of 45.73% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of 36.03%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 68.29% beat Kinross Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lundin Gold45.73% 68.29% 17.59%
Kinross Gold 36.03%34.63%5.16%

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Lundin Gold. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lundin GoldC$1.99B9.49C$215.94MC$3.7720.75
Kinross GoldC$7.96B5.12C$522.52MC$2.3514.53

Summary

Lundin Gold beats Kinross Gold on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lundin Gold compare to Pan American Silver?

Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) and Pan American Silver (TSE:PAAS) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Lundin Gold pays an annual dividend of C$3.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Pan American Silver pays an annual dividend of C$0.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Lundin Gold pays out 84.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pan American Silver pays out 17.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Lundin Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pan American Silver. Pan American Silver is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lundin GoldC$1.99B9.49C$215.94MC$3.7720.75
Pan American SilverC$4B6.51-C$33.47MC$3.1719.51

Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.636773, meaning that its share price is 64% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan American Silver has a beta of 2.01571, meaning that its share price is 102% more volatile than the broader market.

Lundin Gold currently has a consensus target price of C$99.67, indicating a potential upside of 27.40%. Pan American Silver has a consensus target price of C$81.75, indicating a potential upside of 32.20%. Given Pan American Silver's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Pan American Silver is more favorable than Lundin Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lundin Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Pan American Silver
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Lundin Gold had 3 more articles in the media than Pan American Silver. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Lundin Gold and 1 mentions for Pan American Silver. Pan American Silver's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Lundin Gold's score of -0.25 indicating that Pan American Silver is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lundin Gold
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Pan American Silver
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Lundin Gold has a net margin of 45.73% compared to Pan American Silver's net margin of 31.69%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 68.29% beat Pan American Silver's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lundin Gold45.73% 68.29% 17.59%
Pan American Silver 31.69%19.65%0.43%

24.5% of Lundin Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.7% of Pan American Silver shares are owned by institutional investors. 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Pan American Silver shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Lundin Gold beats Pan American Silver on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lundin Gold compare to Alamos Gold?

Alamos Gold (TSE:AGI) and Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

53.4% of Alamos Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.5% of Lundin Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Alamos Gold shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 51.42% compared to Lundin Gold's net margin of 45.73%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 68.29% beat Alamos Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alamos Gold51.42% 25.24% 5.85%
Lundin Gold 45.73%68.29%17.59%

Alamos Gold presently has a consensus price target of C$76.20, suggesting a potential upside of 82.78%. Lundin Gold has a consensus price target of C$99.67, suggesting a potential upside of 27.40%. Given Alamos Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than Lundin Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Alamos Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Lundin Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Lundin Gold has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Alamos Gold. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alamos GoldC$2.07B8.45C$174.87MC$2.5116.61
Lundin GoldC$1.99B9.49C$215.94MC$3.7720.75

Alamos Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Lundin Gold pays an annual dividend of C$3.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Alamos Gold pays out 4.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lundin Gold pays out 84.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 1.885175, indicating that its stock price is 89% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.636773, indicating that its stock price is 64% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Lundin Gold had 4 more articles in the media than Alamos Gold. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Lundin Gold and 0 mentions for Alamos Gold. Alamos Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Lundin Gold's score of -0.25 indicating that Alamos Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Alamos Gold Neutral
Lundin Gold Neutral

Summary

Alamos Gold and Lundin Gold tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Lundin Gold News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LUG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LUG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LUG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricLundin GoldGold IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$18.92BC$4.76BC$4.56BC$12.28B
Dividend Yield7.05%5.64%5.03%6.17%
P/E Ratio20.7536.2321.0736.14
Price / Sales9.49199.995,827.449.56
Price / Cash10.8122.1124.1782.29
Price / Book13.8710.868.744.46
Net IncomeC$215.94MC$6.39MC$157.26MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-4.35%-1.75%-1.46%-0.26%
1 Month Performance1.85%-1.49%-3.35%-0.01%
1 Year Performance11.63%46.77%39.30%32.67%

Lundin Gold Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LUG
Lundin Gold
2.8748 of 5 stars		C$78.23
flat		C$99.67
+27.4%		+11.6%C$18.92BC$1.99B20.751,645
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals
3.564 of 5 stars		C$159.34
-2.8%		C$205.63
+29.0%		+25.1%C$72.36BC$2.75B40.2740
FNV
Franco-Nevada
2.3121 of 5 stars		C$297.59
-1.7%		C$355.44
+19.4%		+33.2%C$57.39BC$2.11B41.9140
K
Kinross Gold
3.5064 of 5 stars		C$34.24
-2.6%		C$50.36
+47.1%		+60.5%C$40.89BC$7.96B14.5730,000
PAAS
Pan American Silver
3.9191 of 5 stars		C$62.81
-1.9%		C$81.75
+30.2%		+49.1%C$26.46BC$4B19.8113,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:LUG) was last updated on 7/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The sell discipline that changed my mind after 30 years
Porter Stansberry spent 30 years ignoring outside investment systems - until he met Emmet Savage in Dublin. Sa...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel