Which has better earnings and valuation, WPM or LUG?

Wheaton Precious Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Lundin Gold. Lundin Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wheaton Precious Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Wheaton Precious Metals C$2.75B 28.52 C$426.03M C$3.96 43.58 Lundin Gold C$1.99B 9.78 C$215.94M C$3.77 21.38

Which has higher earnings and valuation, LUG or FNV?

Lundin Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Franco-Nevada. Lundin Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Lundin Gold C$1.99B 9.78 C$215.94M C$3.77 21.38 Franco-Nevada C$2.11B 28.65 -C$442.97M C$7.10 44.05

Which has higher earnings and valuation, K or LUG?

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Lundin Gold. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Kinross Gold C$7.96B 5.59 C$522.52M C$2.35 15.86 Lundin Gold C$1.99B 9.78 C$215.94M C$3.77 21.38

Is K or LUG more profitable?

Lundin Gold has a net margin of 45.73% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of 36.03%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 68.29% beat Kinross Gold's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Kinross Gold 36.03% 34.63% 5.16% Lundin Gold 45.73% 68.29% 17.59%

Which has higher earnings & valuation, AGI or LUG?

Lundin Gold has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Alamos Gold. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Alamos Gold C$2.07B 9.16 C$174.87M C$2.51 18.02 Lundin Gold C$1.99B 9.78 C$215.94M C$3.77 21.38

Is AGI or LUG more profitable?

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 51.42% compared to Lundin Gold's net margin of 45.73%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 68.29% beat Alamos Gold's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Alamos Gold 51.42% 25.24% 5.85% Lundin Gold 45.73% 68.29% 17.59%

Lundin Gold (LUG) Competitors

C$80.61 +2.12 (+2.70%)

As of 06/22/2026 05:40 PM Eastern

Compare

LUG vs. WPM, FNV, K, PAAS, and AGI

Should you buy Lundin Gold stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Lundin Gold with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Lundin Gold include Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM), Franco-Nevada (FNV), Kinross Gold (K), Pan American Silver (PAAS), and Alamos Gold (AGI). These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Lundin Gold compare to Wheaton Precious Metals?

Wheaton Precious Metals (TSE:WPM) and Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and media sentiment.

Wheaton Precious Metals has a beta of 1.273979, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.521274, meaning that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the broader market.

Wheaton Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of C$0.69 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Lundin Gold pays an annual dividend of C$3.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Wheaton Precious Metals pays out 17.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lundin Gold pays out 84.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Wheaton Precious Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Lundin Gold. Lundin Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wheaton Precious Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Wheaton Precious Metals	C$2.75B	28.52	C$426.03M	C$3.96	43.58
Lundin Gold	C$1.99B	9.78	C$215.94M	C$3.77	21.38

In the previous week, Wheaton Precious Metals had 12 more articles in the media than Lundin Gold. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Wheaton Precious Metals and 0 mentions for Lundin Gold. Wheaton Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Lundin Gold's score of 0.00 indicating that Wheaton Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Wheaton Precious Metals	Positive
Lundin Gold	Neutral

Wheaton Precious Metals has a net margin of 65.55% compared to Lundin Gold's net margin of 45.73%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 68.29% beat Wheaton Precious Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Wheaton Precious Metals	65.55%	21.32%	5.35%
Lundin Gold	45.73%	68.29%	17.59%

62.4% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.9% of Lundin Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Wheaton Precious Metals currently has a consensus price target of C$205.63, suggesting a potential upside of 19.24%. Lundin Gold has a consensus price target of C$100.62, suggesting a potential upside of 24.82%. Given Lundin Gold's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Lundin Gold is more favorable than Wheaton Precious Metals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Wheaton Precious Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.13
Lundin Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Summary

Wheaton Precious Metals beats Lundin Gold on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lundin Gold compare to Franco-Nevada?

Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) and Franco-Nevada (TSE:FNV) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.521274, suggesting that its share price is 52% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.904811, suggesting that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

Franco-Nevada has a net margin of 65.14% compared to Lundin Gold's net margin of 45.73%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 68.29% beat Franco-Nevada's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lundin Gold	45.73%	68.29%	17.59%
Franco-Nevada	65.14%	18.67%	-4.57%

24.9% of Lundin Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.1% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by institutional investors. 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lundin Gold pays an annual dividend of C$3.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of C$1.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Lundin Gold pays out 84.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Franco-Nevada pays out 22.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Lundin Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Franco-Nevada. Lundin Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lundin Gold	C$1.99B	9.78	C$215.94M	C$3.77	21.38
Franco-Nevada	C$2.11B	28.65	-C$442.97M	C$7.10	44.05

In the previous week, Lundin Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Franco-Nevada'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Lundin Gold	Neutral
Franco-Nevada	Neutral

Lundin Gold presently has a consensus price target of C$100.62, indicating a potential upside of 24.82%. Franco-Nevada has a consensus price target of C$355.44, indicating a potential upside of 13.66%. Given Lundin Gold's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Lundin Gold is more favorable than Franco-Nevada.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lundin Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Franco-Nevada	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.60

Summary

Franco-Nevada beats Lundin Gold on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lundin Gold compare to Kinross Gold?

Kinross Gold (TSE:K) and Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, profitability, valuation and earnings.

48.9% of Kinross Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.9% of Lundin Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Kinross Gold shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Kinross Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Lundin Gold'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Kinross Gold	Neutral
Lundin Gold	Neutral

Kinross Gold has a beta of 1.364613, indicating that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.521274, indicating that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the broader market.

Kinross Gold presently has a consensus target price of C$52.42, suggesting a potential upside of 40.68%. Lundin Gold has a consensus target price of C$100.62, suggesting a potential upside of 24.82%. Given Kinross Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than Lundin Gold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Kinross Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Lundin Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Lundin Gold has a net margin of 45.73% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of 36.03%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 68.29% beat Kinross Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Kinross Gold	36.03%	34.63%	5.16%
Lundin Gold	45.73%	68.29%	17.59%

Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Lundin Gold pays an annual dividend of C$3.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Kinross Gold pays out 5.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lundin Gold pays out 84.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Lundin Gold. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Kinross Gold	C$7.96B	5.59	C$522.52M	C$2.35	15.86
Lundin Gold	C$1.99B	9.78	C$215.94M	C$3.77	21.38

Summary

Lundin Gold beats Kinross Gold on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lundin Gold compare to Pan American Silver?

Pan American Silver (TSE:PAAS) and Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

43.6% of Pan American Silver shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.9% of Lundin Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Pan American Silver shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Pan American Silver pays an annual dividend of C$0.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Lundin Gold pays an annual dividend of C$3.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Pan American Silver pays out 17.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lundin Gold pays out 84.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Pan American Silver presently has a consensus target price of C$81.75, indicating a potential upside of 17.98%. Lundin Gold has a consensus target price of C$100.62, indicating a potential upside of 24.82%. Given Lundin Gold's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Lundin Gold is more favorable than Pan American Silver.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pan American Silver	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Lundin Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Lundin Gold has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pan American Silver. Lundin Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pan American Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pan American Silver	C$4B	7.30	-C$33.47M	C$3.17	21.86
Lundin Gold	C$1.99B	9.78	C$215.94M	C$3.77	21.38

In the previous week, Pan American Silver had 1 more articles in the media than Lundin Gold. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Pan American Silver and 0 mentions for Lundin Gold. Pan American Silver's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Lundin Gold'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Pan American Silver	Neutral
Lundin Gold	Neutral

Lundin Gold has a net margin of 45.73% compared to Pan American Silver's net margin of 31.69%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 68.29% beat Pan American Silver's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pan American Silver	31.69%	19.65%	0.43%
Lundin Gold	45.73%	68.29%	17.59%

Pan American Silver has a beta of 1.861535, indicating that its share price is 86% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.521274, indicating that its share price is 52% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Lundin Gold beats Pan American Silver on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lundin Gold compare to Alamos Gold?

Alamos Gold (TSE:AGI) and Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and profitability.

In the previous week, Alamos Gold had 2 more articles in the media than Lundin Gold. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Alamos Gold and 0 mentions for Lundin Gold. Lundin Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Alamos Gold's score of -0.07 indicating that Lundin Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Alamos Gold	Neutral
Lundin Gold	Neutral

Alamos Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Lundin Gold pays an annual dividend of C$3.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Alamos Gold pays out 4.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lundin Gold pays out 84.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 51.42% compared to Lundin Gold's net margin of 45.73%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 68.29% beat Alamos Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Alamos Gold	51.42%	25.24%	5.85%
Lundin Gold	45.73%	68.29%	17.59%

54.0% of Alamos Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.9% of Lundin Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Alamos Gold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lundin Gold has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Alamos Gold. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Alamos Gold	C$2.07B	9.16	C$174.87M	C$2.51	18.02
Lundin Gold	C$1.99B	9.78	C$215.94M	C$3.77	21.38

Alamos Gold has a beta of 1.733396, indicating that its share price is 73% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.521274, indicating that its share price is 52% more volatile than the broader market.

Alamos Gold currently has a consensus target price of C$76.20, suggesting a potential upside of 68.51%. Lundin Gold has a consensus target price of C$100.62, suggesting a potential upside of 24.82%. Given Alamos Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than Lundin Gold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Alamos Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.20
Lundin Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Summary

Alamos Gold beats Lundin Gold on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Lundin Gold News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LUG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

LUG vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Lundin Gold	Gold Industry	Materials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$19.49B	C$5.02B	C$4.76B	C$12.23B
Dividend Yield	6.98%	5.63%	5.00%	6.19%
P/E Ratio	21.38	36.83	23.23	35.87
Price / Sales	9.78	204.06	5,554.76	10.63
Price / Cash	10.81	22.11	24.30	82.29
Price / Book	14.30	11.67	8.94	4.49
Net Income	C$215.94M	C$6.39M	C$157.26M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-5.15%	-2.31%	-2.17%	-0.94%
1 Month Performance	-5.44%	-2.36%	-2.75%	-0.66%
1 Year Performance	10.17%	57.20%	55.20%	41.77%

Lundin Gold Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
LUG Lundin Gold	2.3648 of 5 stars	C$80.61 +2.7%	C$100.62 +24.8%	+10.8%	C$19.49B	C$1.99B	21.38	1,645
WPM Wheaton Precious Metals	3.4974 of 5 stars	C$179.94 +3.8%	C$205.63 +14.3%	+40.6%	C$81.72B	C$2.75B	45.47	40	News Coverage Analyst Revision
FNV Franco-Nevada	1.659 of 5 stars	C$323.42 +4.0%	C$355.44 +9.9%	+37.1%	C$62.37B	C$2.11B	45.55	40
K Kinross Gold	2.9755 of 5 stars	C$39.34 +2.9%	C$52.42 +33.2%	+75.4%	C$46.98B	C$7.96B	16.74	30,000
PAAS Pan American Silver	2.4731 of 5 stars	C$72.98 +2.3%	C$81.75 +12.0%	+76.2%	C$30.75B	C$4B	23.02	13,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:LUG) was last updated on 6/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Lundin Gold (LUG) Competitors

LUG vs. WPM, FNV, K, PAAS, and AGI

How does Lundin Gold compare to Wheaton Precious Metals?

Summary

How does Lundin Gold compare to Franco-Nevada?

Summary

How does Lundin Gold compare to Kinross Gold?

Summary

How does Lundin Gold compare to Pan American Silver?

Summary

How does Lundin Gold compare to Alamos Gold?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LUG vs. The Competition

Lundin Gold Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Lundin Gold (LUG) Competitors

LUG vs. WPM, FNV, K, PAAS, and AGI

How does Lundin Gold compare to Wheaton Precious Metals?

Which has more risk and volatility, WPM or LUG?

Is WPM or LUG a better dividend stock?

Which has better earnings and valuation, WPM or LUG?

Does the media favor WPM or LUG?

Is WPM or LUG more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in WPM or LUG?

Do analysts prefer WPM or LUG?

Summary

How does Lundin Gold compare to Franco-Nevada?

Which has more risk and volatility, LUG or FNV?

Is LUG or FNV more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in LUG or FNV?

Is LUG or FNV a better dividend stock?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, LUG or FNV?

Does the media refer more to LUG or FNV?

Do analysts prefer LUG or FNV?

Summary

How does Lundin Gold compare to Kinross Gold?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of K or LUG?

Does the media refer more to K or LUG?

Which has more risk & volatility, K or LUG?

Do analysts prefer K or LUG?

Is K or LUG more profitable?

Is K or LUG a better dividend stock?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, K or LUG?

Summary

How does Lundin Gold compare to Pan American Silver?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in PAAS or LUG?

Is PAAS or LUG a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend PAAS or LUG?

Which has better earnings and valuation, PAAS or LUG?

Does the media refer more to PAAS or LUG?

Is PAAS or LUG more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, PAAS or LUG?

Summary

How does Lundin Gold compare to Alamos Gold?

Does the media prefer AGI or LUG?

Is AGI or LUG a better dividend stock?

Is AGI or LUG more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in AGI or LUG?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, AGI or LUG?

Which has more risk & volatility, AGI or LUG?

Do analysts recommend AGI or LUG?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LUG vs. The Competition

Lundin Gold Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools