Which has better earnings & valuation, LUG or WPM?

Wheaton Precious Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Lundin Gold. Lundin Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wheaton Precious Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Lundin Gold C$2.02B 12.55 C$215.94M C$3.85 27.22 Wheaton Precious Metals C$3.17B 31.78 C$426.03M C$4.51 49.23

Does the media prefer LUG or WPM?

In the previous week, Wheaton Precious Metals had 9 more articles in the media than Lundin Gold. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Wheaton Precious Metals and 7 mentions for Lundin Gold. Lundin Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat Wheaton Precious Metals' score of -0.30 indicating that Lundin Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lundin Gold 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Wheaton Precious Metals 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, LUG or FNV?

Lundin Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Franco-Nevada. Lundin Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Lundin Gold C$2.02B 12.55 C$215.94M C$3.85 27.22 Franco-Nevada C$2.32B 31.14 -C$442.97M C$7.65 48.89

Does the media prefer LUG or FNV?

In the previous week, Franco-Nevada had 2 more articles in the media than Lundin Gold. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Franco-Nevada and 7 mentions for Lundin Gold. Lundin Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat Franco-Nevada's score of 0.24 indicating that Lundin Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lundin Gold 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Franco-Nevada 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better earnings & valuation, LUG or K?

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Lundin Gold. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Lundin Gold C$2.02B 12.55 C$215.94M C$3.85 27.22 Kinross Gold C$8.47B 6.39 C$522.52M C$2.63 17.34

Is LUG or K more profitable?

Lundin Gold has a net margin of 46.31% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of 37.56%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 81.63% beat Kinross Gold's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Lundin Gold 46.31% 81.63% 17.59% Kinross Gold 37.56% 35.91% 5.16%

Does the media favor LUG or K?

In the previous week, Kinross Gold had 14 more articles in the media than Lundin Gold. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Kinross Gold and 7 mentions for Lundin Gold. Lundin Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat Kinross Gold's score of -0.10 indicating that Lundin Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lundin Gold 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Kinross Gold 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor LUG or PAAS?

In the previous week, Lundin Gold had 6 more articles in the media than Pan American Silver. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Lundin Gold and 1 mentions for Pan American Silver. Pan American Silver's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Lundin Gold's score of 0.32 indicating that Pan American Silver is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lundin Gold 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Pan American Silver 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation & earnings, LUG or AGI?

Lundin Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Alamos Gold. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Lundin Gold C$2.02B 12.55 C$215.94M C$3.85 27.22 Alamos Gold C$2.23B 9.98 C$174.87M C$2.79 19.04

Is LUG or AGI more profitable?

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 52.85% compared to Lundin Gold's net margin of 46.31%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 81.63% beat Alamos Gold's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Lundin Gold 46.31% 81.63% 17.59% Alamos Gold 52.85% 26.10% 5.85%

Lundin Gold (LUG) Competitors

C$104.78 +3.98 (+3.95%)

As of 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

LUG vs. WPM, FNV, K, PAAS, and AGI

Should you buy Lundin Gold stock or one of its competitors? Lundin Gold's main competitors and comparable companies include Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM), Franco-Nevada (FNV), Kinross Gold (K), Pan American Silver (PAAS), and Alamos Gold (AGI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Lundin Gold compare to Wheaton Precious Metals?

Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) and Wheaton Precious Metals (TSE:WPM) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

Lundin Gold pays an annual dividend of C$3.95 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Wheaton Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of C$0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Lundin Gold pays out 102.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Wheaton Precious Metals pays out 16.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Wheaton Precious Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Lundin Gold. Lundin Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wheaton Precious Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lundin Gold	C$2.02B	12.55	C$215.94M	C$3.85	27.22
Wheaton Precious Metals	C$3.17B	31.78	C$426.03M	C$4.51	49.23

Lundin Gold presently has a consensus price target of C$101.33, suggesting a potential downside of 3.29%. Wheaton Precious Metals has a consensus price target of C$194.63, suggesting a potential downside of 12.31%. Given Lundin Gold's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Lundin Gold is more favorable than Wheaton Precious Metals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lundin Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Wheaton Precious Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.13

In the previous week, Wheaton Precious Metals had 9 more articles in the media than Lundin Gold. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Wheaton Precious Metals and 7 mentions for Lundin Gold. Lundin Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat Wheaton Precious Metals' score of -0.30 indicating that Lundin Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lundin Gold	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Wheaton Precious Metals	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.619444, meaning that its share price is 62% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Wheaton Precious Metals has a beta of 1.387304, meaning that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

Wheaton Precious Metals has a net margin of 64.66% compared to Lundin Gold's net margin of 46.31%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 81.63% beat Wheaton Precious Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lundin Gold	46.31%	81.63%	17.59%
Wheaton Precious Metals	64.66%	22.96%	5.35%

24.5% of Lundin Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.0% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Wheaton Precious Metals beats Lundin Gold on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lundin Gold compare to Franco-Nevada?

Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) and Franco-Nevada (TSE:FNV) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.619444, meaning that its share price is 62% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.961958, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Franco-Nevada had 2 more articles in the media than Lundin Gold. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Franco-Nevada and 7 mentions for Lundin Gold. Lundin Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat Franco-Nevada's score of 0.24 indicating that Lundin Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lundin Gold	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Franco-Nevada	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

24.5% of Lundin Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.2% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by institutional investors. 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Lundin Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Franco-Nevada. Lundin Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lundin Gold	C$2.02B	12.55	C$215.94M	C$3.85	27.22
Franco-Nevada	C$2.32B	31.14	-C$442.97M	C$7.65	48.89

Lundin Gold pays an annual dividend of C$3.95 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of C$1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Lundin Gold pays out 102.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Franco-Nevada pays out 21.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Franco-Nevada has a net margin of 63.83% compared to Lundin Gold's net margin of 46.31%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 81.63% beat Franco-Nevada's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lundin Gold	46.31%	81.63%	17.59%
Franco-Nevada	63.83%	18.95%	-4.57%

Lundin Gold currently has a consensus price target of C$101.33, indicating a potential downside of 3.29%. Franco-Nevada has a consensus price target of C$356.56, indicating a potential downside of 4.67%. Given Lundin Gold's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Lundin Gold is more favorable than Franco-Nevada.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lundin Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Franco-Nevada	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.60

Summary

Franco-Nevada beats Lundin Gold on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lundin Gold compare to Kinross Gold?

Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) and Kinross Gold (TSE:K) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Kinross Gold had 14 more articles in the media than Lundin Gold. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Kinross Gold and 7 mentions for Lundin Gold. Lundin Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat Kinross Gold's score of -0.10 indicating that Lundin Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lundin Gold	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Kinross Gold	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.619444, indicating that its share price is 62% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kinross Gold has a beta of 1.480211, indicating that its share price is 48% more volatile than the broader market.

24.5% of Lundin Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.9% of Kinross Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Kinross Gold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lundin Gold pays an annual dividend of C$3.95 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Lundin Gold pays out 102.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kinross Gold pays out 5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Lundin Gold currently has a consensus price target of C$101.33, suggesting a potential downside of 3.29%. Kinross Gold has a consensus price target of C$47.36, suggesting a potential upside of 3.83%. Given Kinross Gold's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than Lundin Gold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lundin Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Kinross Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Lundin Gold has a net margin of 46.31% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of 37.56%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 81.63% beat Kinross Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lundin Gold	46.31%	81.63%	17.59%
Kinross Gold	37.56%	35.91%	5.16%

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Lundin Gold. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lundin Gold	C$2.02B	12.55	C$215.94M	C$3.85	27.22
Kinross Gold	C$8.47B	6.39	C$522.52M	C$2.63	17.34

Summary

Lundin Gold beats Kinross Gold on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lundin Gold compare to Pan American Silver?

Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) and Pan American Silver (TSE:PAAS) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Lundin Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pan American Silver. Pan American Silver is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lundin Gold	C$2.02B	12.55	C$215.94M	C$3.85	27.22
Pan American Silver	C$4.31B	7.13	-C$33.47M	C$3.38	21.94

In the previous week, Lundin Gold had 6 more articles in the media than Pan American Silver. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Lundin Gold and 1 mentions for Pan American Silver. Pan American Silver's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Lundin Gold's score of 0.32 indicating that Pan American Silver is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lundin Gold	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Pan American Silver	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

24.5% of Lundin Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.4% of Pan American Silver shares are held by institutional investors. 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Pan American Silver shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lundin Gold pays an annual dividend of C$3.95 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Pan American Silver pays an annual dividend of C$0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Lundin Gold pays out 102.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pan American Silver pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Lundin Gold presently has a consensus target price of C$101.33, suggesting a potential downside of 3.29%. Pan American Silver has a consensus target price of C$84.40, suggesting a potential upside of 13.82%. Given Pan American Silver's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Pan American Silver is more favorable than Lundin Gold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lundin Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Pan American Silver	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.619444, suggesting that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan American Silver has a beta of 1.980443, suggesting that its stock price is 98% more volatile than the broader market.

Lundin Gold has a net margin of 46.31% compared to Pan American Silver's net margin of 32.06%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 81.63% beat Pan American Silver's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lundin Gold	46.31%	81.63%	17.59%
Pan American Silver	32.06%	19.61%	0.43%

Summary

Lundin Gold beats Pan American Silver on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lundin Gold compare to Alamos Gold?

Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) and Alamos Gold (TSE:AGI) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Lundin Gold presently has a consensus target price of C$101.33, suggesting a potential downside of 3.29%. Alamos Gold has a consensus target price of C$74.70, suggesting a potential upside of 40.60%. Given Alamos Gold's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than Lundin Gold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lundin Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Alamos Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.619444, suggesting that its share price is 62% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alamos Gold has a beta of 1.871669, suggesting that its share price is 87% more volatile than the broader market.

24.5% of Lundin Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.3% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Lundin Gold pays an annual dividend of C$3.95 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Alamos Gold pays an annual dividend of C$0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Lundin Gold pays out 102.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Alamos Gold pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 52.85% compared to Lundin Gold's net margin of 46.31%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 81.63% beat Alamos Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lundin Gold	46.31%	81.63%	17.59%
Alamos Gold	52.85%	26.10%	5.85%

Lundin Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Alamos Gold. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lundin Gold	C$2.02B	12.55	C$215.94M	C$3.85	27.22
Alamos Gold	C$2.23B	9.98	C$174.87M	C$2.79	19.04

In the previous week, Lundin Gold had 7 more articles in the media than Alamos Gold. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Lundin Gold and 0 mentions for Alamos Gold. Lundin Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat Alamos Gold's score of 0.00 indicating that Lundin Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Lundin Gold	Neutral
Alamos Gold	Neutral

Summary

Lundin Gold beats Alamos Gold on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Lundin Gold News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LUG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

LUG vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Lundin Gold	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$25.34B	C$4.13B	C$5.13B	C$12.58B
Dividend Yield	5.88%	5.20%	4.69%	6.22%
P/E Ratio	27.22	25.97	26.59	38.95
Price / Sales	12.55	8,015.42	4,768.39	10.07
Price / Cash	10.81	26.68	24.71	82.29
Price / Book	46.58	10.93	9.19	4.80
Net Income	C$215.94M	C$122.81M	C$154.52M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	15.40%	6.37%	4.90%	0.73%
1 Month Performance	32.00%	16.79%	13.20%	5.30%
1 Year Performance	31.73%	58.93%	46.29%	34.77%

Lundin Gold Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
LUG Lundin Gold	1.5066 of 5 stars	C$104.78 +3.9%	C$101.33 -3.3%	+26.7%	C$25.34B	C$2.02B	27.22	1,645	News Coverage Analyst Revision Gap Up
WPM Wheaton Precious Metals	1.0143 of 5 stars	C$185.31 -2.2%	C$194.63 +5.0%	+64.2%	C$84.16B	C$3.17B	41.11	40	News Coverage Dividend Announcement Analyst Revision
FNV Franco-Nevada	1.242 of 5 stars	C$324.59 -1.9%	C$356.56 +9.8%	+43.0%	C$62.60B	C$2.32B	42.43	40	News Coverage Insider Trade Analyst Revision
K Kinross Gold	1.6846 of 5 stars	C$37.83 -1.6%	C$47.36 +25.2%	+66.2%	C$44.88B	C$8.47B	14.38	30,000	Analyst Revision
PAAS Pan American Silver	2.3713 of 5 stars	C$64.85 -2.9%	C$84.40 +30.1%	+61.8%	C$26.89B	C$4.31B	19.19	13,000	Dividend Increase

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:LUG) was last updated on 8/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Lundin Gold (LUG) Competitors

LUG vs. WPM, FNV, K, PAAS, and AGI

How does Lundin Gold compare to Wheaton Precious Metals?

Summary

How does Lundin Gold compare to Franco-Nevada?

Summary

How does Lundin Gold compare to Kinross Gold?

Summary

How does Lundin Gold compare to Pan American Silver?

Summary

How does Lundin Gold compare to Alamos Gold?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LUG vs. The Competition

Lundin Gold Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Lundin Gold (LUG) Competitors

LUG vs. WPM, FNV, K, PAAS, and AGI

How does Lundin Gold compare to Wheaton Precious Metals?

Is LUG or WPM a better dividend stock?

Which has better earnings & valuation, LUG or WPM?

Do analysts rate LUG or WPM?

Does the media prefer LUG or WPM?

Which has more risk and volatility, LUG or WPM?

Is LUG or WPM more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in LUG or WPM?

Summary

How does Lundin Gold compare to Franco-Nevada?

Which has more risk & volatility, LUG or FNV?

Does the media prefer LUG or FNV?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in LUG or FNV?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, LUG or FNV?

Is LUG or FNV a better dividend stock?

Is LUG or FNV more profitable?

Do analysts prefer LUG or FNV?

Summary

How does Lundin Gold compare to Kinross Gold?

Does the media favor LUG or K?

Which has more volatility and risk, LUG or K?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in LUG or K?

Is LUG or K a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate LUG or K?

Is LUG or K more profitable?

Which has better earnings & valuation, LUG or K?

Summary

How does Lundin Gold compare to Pan American Silver?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, LUG or PAAS?

Does the media favor LUG or PAAS?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in LUG or PAAS?

Is LUG or PAAS a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer LUG or PAAS?

Which has more volatility and risk, LUG or PAAS?

Is LUG or PAAS more profitable?

Summary

How does Lundin Gold compare to Alamos Gold?

Do analysts recommend LUG or AGI?

Which has more risk & volatility, LUG or AGI?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of LUG or AGI?

Is LUG or AGI a better dividend stock?

Is LUG or AGI more profitable?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, LUG or AGI?

Does the media prefer LUG or AGI?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LUG vs. The Competition

Lundin Gold Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools