Free Trial
Final Hours! Save $100 on MarketBeat All Access Before 11:59 PM
  • 0Days
  • 0Hours
  • 0Minutes
  • 0Seconds
Lock In $149 Tonight
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Lithium Americas (LAC) Competitors

Lithium Americas logo
C$6.96 +0.19 (+2.81%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

LAC vs. TRQ, ERO, PVG, BCB, and IE

Should you buy Lithium Americas stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Lithium Americas with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Lithium Americas include Turquoise Hill Resources (TRQ), Ero Copper (ERO), Pretium Resources (PVG), Cott (BCB), and Ivanhoe Electric (IE). These companies are all part of the "non-metallic and industrial metal mining" industry.

How does Lithium Americas compare to Turquoise Hill Resources?

Lithium Americas (TSE:LAC) and Turquoise Hill Resources (TSE:TRQ) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

Lithium Americas has a net margin of 1,429,488,235.29% compared to Turquoise Hill Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Turquoise Hill Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Lithium Americas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lithium Americas1,429,488,235.29% -12.63% -3.41%
Turquoise Hill Resources N/A N/A N/A

Turquoise Hill Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Lithium Americas. Lithium Americas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Turquoise Hill Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lithium AmericasN/AN/A-C$20.27M-C$0.45N/A
Turquoise Hill ResourcesC$1.65B0.00C$730.47MC$3.63N/A

Lithium Americas currently has a consensus target price of C$8.25, indicating a potential upside of 18.53%. Given Lithium Americas' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Lithium Americas is more favorable than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lithium Americas
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Turquoise Hill Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Lithium Americas had 1 more articles in the media than Turquoise Hill Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Lithium Americas and 0 mentions for Turquoise Hill Resources. Lithium Americas' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Turquoise Hill Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Lithium Americas is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lithium Americas Positive
Turquoise Hill Resources Neutral

18.6% of Lithium Americas shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.4% of Lithium Americas shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Lithium Americas beats Turquoise Hill Resources on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas compare to Ero Copper?

Ero Copper (TSE:ERO) and Lithium Americas (TSE:LAC) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Lithium Americas has a net margin of 1,429,488,235.29% compared to Ero Copper's net margin of 31.55%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 31.19% beat Lithium Americas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ero Copper31.55% 31.19% 3.46%
Lithium Americas 1,429,488,235.29%-12.63%-3.41%

Ero Copper has higher revenue and earnings than Lithium Americas. Lithium Americas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ero Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ero CopperC$923.93M4.42C$10.88MC$2.8014.00
Lithium AmericasN/AN/A-C$20.27M-C$0.45N/A

Ero Copper currently has a consensus price target of C$45.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.80%. Lithium Americas has a consensus price target of C$8.25, suggesting a potential upside of 18.53%. Given Lithium Americas' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Lithium Americas is more favorable than Ero Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ero Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Lithium Americas
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

In the previous week, Ero Copper and Ero Copper both had 1 articles in the media. Lithium Americas' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Ero Copper's score of 0.00 indicating that Lithium Americas is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ero Copper
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Lithium Americas
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Ero Copper has a beta of 1.929821, meaning that its stock price is 93% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lithium Americas has a beta of 1.25853, meaning that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

62.7% of Ero Copper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.6% of Lithium Americas shares are held by institutional investors. 10.4% of Ero Copper shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of Lithium Americas shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Ero Copper beats Lithium Americas on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas compare to Pretium Resources?

Lithium Americas (TSE:LAC) and Pretium Resources (TSE:PVG) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, media sentiment, dividends and valuation.

Lithium Americas currently has a consensus target price of C$8.25, indicating a potential upside of 18.53%. Given Lithium Americas' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Lithium Americas is more favorable than Pretium Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lithium Americas
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Pretium Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

18.6% of Lithium Americas shares are held by institutional investors. 7.4% of Lithium Americas shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Lithium Americas has a net margin of 1,429,488,235.29% compared to Pretium Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Pretium Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Lithium Americas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lithium Americas1,429,488,235.29% -12.63% -3.41%
Pretium Resources N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Lithium Americas had 1 more articles in the media than Pretium Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Lithium Americas and 0 mentions for Pretium Resources. Lithium Americas' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Pretium Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Lithium Americas is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lithium Americas Positive
Pretium Resources Neutral

Lithium Americas has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pretium Resources. Lithium Americas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pretium Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lithium AmericasN/AN/A-C$20.27M-C$0.45N/A
Pretium ResourcesC$611.14M0.00-C$46.98M-C$0.25N/A

Summary

Lithium Americas beats Pretium Resources on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas compare to Cott?

Lithium Americas (TSE:LAC) and Cott (TSE:BCB) are both mid-cap non-metallic and industrial metal mining companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Lithium Americas has a net margin of 1,429,488,235.29% compared to Cott's net margin of 0.00%. Cott's return on equity of 0.00% beat Lithium Americas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lithium Americas1,429,488,235.29% -12.63% -3.41%
Cott N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Lithium Americas had 1 more articles in the media than Cott. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Lithium Americas and 0 mentions for Cott. Lithium Americas' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Cott's score of 0.00 indicating that Lithium Americas is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lithium Americas Positive
Cott Neutral

Lithium Americas presently has a consensus price target of C$8.25, suggesting a potential upside of 18.53%. Given Lithium Americas' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Lithium Americas is more favorable than Cott.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lithium Americas
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Cott
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

18.6% of Lithium Americas shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.4% of Lithium Americas shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cott has higher revenue and earnings than Lithium Americas. Lithium Americas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lithium AmericasN/AN/A-C$20.27M-C$0.45N/A
CottC$2.39B0.00C$2.71MC$0.02N/A

Summary

Lithium Americas beats Cott on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas compare to Ivanhoe Electric?

Lithium Americas (TSE:LAC) and Ivanhoe Electric (TSE:IE) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Lithium Americas presently has a consensus price target of C$8.25, suggesting a potential upside of 18.53%. Ivanhoe Electric has a consensus price target of C$26.25, suggesting a potential upside of 53.96%. Given Ivanhoe Electric's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ivanhoe Electric is more favorable than Lithium Americas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lithium Americas
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Ivanhoe Electric
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

Lithium Americas has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ivanhoe Electric. Ivanhoe Electric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lithium Americas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lithium AmericasN/AN/A-C$20.27M-C$0.45N/A
Ivanhoe ElectricC$3.37M801.57-C$137.37M-C$0.29N/A

18.6% of Lithium Americas shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.1% of Ivanhoe Electric shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.4% of Lithium Americas shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.1% of Ivanhoe Electric shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lithium Americas has a net margin of 1,429,488,235.29% compared to Ivanhoe Electric's net margin of -1,002.45%. Ivanhoe Electric's return on equity of -8.83% beat Lithium Americas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lithium Americas1,429,488,235.29% -12.63% -3.41%
Ivanhoe Electric -1,002.45%-8.83%-34.41%

In the previous week, Lithium Americas and Lithium Americas both had 1 articles in the media. Lithium Americas' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Ivanhoe Electric's score of 0.00 indicating that Lithium Americas is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lithium Americas
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ivanhoe Electric
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Lithium Americas has a beta of 1.25853, meaning that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ivanhoe Electric has a beta of 2.089703, meaning that its share price is 109% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ivanhoe Electric beats Lithium Americas on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Lithium Americas News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LAC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LAC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LAC vs. The Competition

MetricLithium AmericasOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$2.44BC$1.60BC$4.80BC$12.16B
Dividend YieldN/A6.56%5.01%6.20%
P/E Ratio-15.4730.2923.1237.64
Price / SalesN/A57,253.926,750.5411.68
Price / Cash10.9124.6327.2182.29
Price / Book1.315.986.734.50
Net Income-C$20.27MC$70.60MC$157.11MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance0.72%-0.28%-0.51%1.38%
1 Month Performance9.61%1.13%-0.41%1.46%
1 Year Performance78.92%119.58%74.77%55.45%

Lithium Americas Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LAC
Lithium Americas
1.8678 of 5 stars
C$6.96
+2.8%
C$8.25
+18.5%
+74.0%C$2.44BN/AN/A749
TRQ
Turquoise Hill Resources
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$8.65BC$1.65B11.843,480
ERO
Ero Copper
2.2057 of 5 stars
C$35.57
-5.3%
C$45.00
+26.5%
+90.1%C$3.71BC$923.93M12.702,460
PVG
Pretium Resources
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$3.60BC$611.14MN/A112
BCB
Cott
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$2.64BC$2.39B976.0010,900

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:LAC) was last updated on 5/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners