Free Trial

Lithium Americas (LAC) Competitors

Lithium Americas logo
C$6.35 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 06/12/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

LAC vs. NXE, TRQ, ERO, PVG, and IE

Should you buy Lithium Americas stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Lithium Americas with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Lithium Americas include NexGen Energy (NXE), Turquoise Hill Resources (TRQ), Ero Copper (ERO), Pretium Resources (PVG), and Ivanhoe Electric (IE). These companies are all part of the "non-metallic and industrial metal mining" industry.

How does Lithium Americas compare to NexGen Energy?

Lithium Americas (TSE:LAC) and NexGen Energy (TSE:NXE) are both mid-cap non-metallic and industrial metal mining companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and institutional ownership.

Lithium Americas has a net margin of 1,429,488,235.29% compared to NexGen Energy's net margin of 0.00%. Lithium Americas' return on equity of -12.63% beat NexGen Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lithium Americas1,429,488,235.29% -12.63% -3.41%
NexGen Energy N/A -30.30%-4.99%

Lithium Americas presently has a consensus price target of C$8.25, indicating a potential upside of 29.92%. NexGen Energy has a consensus price target of C$19.75, indicating a potential upside of 43.53%. Given NexGen Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe NexGen Energy is more favorable than Lithium Americas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lithium Americas
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
NexGen Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

18.5% of Lithium Americas shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.4% of NexGen Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.4% of Lithium Americas shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of NexGen Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Lithium Americas has a beta of 1.25853, meaning that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NexGen Energy has a beta of 1.204127, meaning that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

NexGen Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lithium Americas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lithium AmericasN/AN/A-C$20.27M-C$0.45N/A
NexGen EnergyN/AN/AC$148.05M-C$0.68N/A

In the previous week, NexGen Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Lithium Americas. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for NexGen Energy and 1 mentions for Lithium Americas. NexGen Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Lithium Americas' score of 0.05 indicating that NexGen Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lithium Americas
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
NexGen Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

NexGen Energy beats Lithium Americas on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas compare to Turquoise Hill Resources?

Lithium Americas (TSE:LAC) and Turquoise Hill Resources (TSE:TRQ) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends and institutional ownership.

Lithium Americas has a net margin of 1,429,488,235.29% compared to Turquoise Hill Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Turquoise Hill Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Lithium Americas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lithium Americas1,429,488,235.29% -12.63% -3.41%
Turquoise Hill Resources N/A N/A N/A

Turquoise Hill Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Lithium Americas. Lithium Americas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Turquoise Hill Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lithium AmericasN/AN/A-C$20.27M-C$0.45N/A
Turquoise Hill ResourcesC$1.65B0.00C$730.47MC$3.63N/A

In the previous week, Lithium Americas had 1 more articles in the media than Turquoise Hill Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Lithium Americas and 0 mentions for Turquoise Hill Resources. Lithium Americas' average media sentiment score of 0.05 beat Turquoise Hill Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Lithium Americas is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lithium Americas Neutral
Turquoise Hill Resources Neutral

Lithium Americas currently has a consensus target price of C$8.25, indicating a potential upside of 29.92%. Given Lithium Americas' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Lithium Americas is more favorable than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lithium Americas
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Turquoise Hill Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

18.5% of Lithium Americas shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.4% of Lithium Americas shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Lithium Americas beats Turquoise Hill Resources on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas compare to Ero Copper?

Lithium Americas (TSE:LAC) and Ero Copper (TSE:ERO) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Lithium Americas currently has a consensus target price of C$8.25, indicating a potential upside of 29.92%. Ero Copper has a consensus target price of C$45.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.57%. Given Lithium Americas' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Lithium Americas is more favorable than Ero Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lithium Americas
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Ero Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

Lithium Americas has a beta of 1.25853, meaning that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ero Copper has a beta of 1.767113, meaning that its share price is 77% more volatile than the broader market.

Ero Copper has higher revenue and earnings than Lithium Americas. Lithium Americas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ero Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lithium AmericasN/AN/A-C$20.27M-C$0.45N/A
Ero CopperC$923.93M4.64C$10.88MC$2.8014.67

Lithium Americas has a net margin of 1,429,488,235.29% compared to Ero Copper's net margin of 31.55%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 31.19% beat Lithium Americas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lithium Americas1,429,488,235.29% -12.63% -3.41%
Ero Copper 31.55%31.19%3.46%

In the previous week, Ero Copper had 1 more articles in the media than Lithium Americas. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Ero Copper and 1 mentions for Lithium Americas. Lithium Americas' average media sentiment score of 0.05 beat Ero Copper's score of 0.00 indicating that Lithium Americas is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lithium Americas
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Ero Copper
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

18.5% of Lithium Americas shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.7% of Ero Copper shares are held by institutional investors. 7.4% of Lithium Americas shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.4% of Ero Copper shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Ero Copper beats Lithium Americas on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas compare to Pretium Resources?

Lithium Americas (TSE:LAC) and Pretium Resources (TSE:PVG) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and valuation.

18.5% of Lithium Americas shares are held by institutional investors. 7.4% of Lithium Americas shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lithium Americas has a net margin of 1,429,488,235.29% compared to Pretium Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Pretium Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Lithium Americas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lithium Americas1,429,488,235.29% -12.63% -3.41%
Pretium Resources N/A N/A N/A

Lithium Americas currently has a consensus price target of C$8.25, suggesting a potential upside of 29.92%. Given Lithium Americas' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Lithium Americas is more favorable than Pretium Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lithium Americas
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Pretium Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Lithium Americas had 1 more articles in the media than Pretium Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Lithium Americas and 0 mentions for Pretium Resources. Lithium Americas' average media sentiment score of 0.05 beat Pretium Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Lithium Americas is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lithium Americas Neutral
Pretium Resources Neutral

Lithium Americas has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pretium Resources. Lithium Americas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pretium Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lithium AmericasN/AN/A-C$20.27M-C$0.45N/A
Pretium ResourcesC$611.14M0.00-C$46.98M-C$0.25N/A

Summary

Lithium Americas beats Pretium Resources on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas compare to Ivanhoe Electric?

Ivanhoe Electric (TSE:IE) and Lithium Americas (TSE:LAC) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Ivanhoe Electric presently has a consensus target price of C$26.25, indicating a potential upside of 67.62%. Lithium Americas has a consensus target price of C$8.25, indicating a potential upside of 29.92%. Given Ivanhoe Electric's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ivanhoe Electric is more favorable than Lithium Americas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ivanhoe Electric
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25
Lithium Americas
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Lithium Americas has a net margin of 1,429,488,235.29% compared to Ivanhoe Electric's net margin of -1,002.45%. Ivanhoe Electric's return on equity of -8.83% beat Lithium Americas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ivanhoe Electric-1,002.45% -8.83% -34.41%
Lithium Americas 1,429,488,235.29%-12.63%-3.41%

56.5% of Ivanhoe Electric shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.5% of Lithium Americas shares are held by institutional investors. 37.1% of Ivanhoe Electric shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of Lithium Americas shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lithium Americas has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ivanhoe Electric. Ivanhoe Electric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lithium Americas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ivanhoe ElectricC$3.37M736.22-C$137.37M-C$0.29N/A
Lithium AmericasN/AN/A-C$20.27M-C$0.45N/A

In the previous week, Lithium Americas had 1 more articles in the media than Ivanhoe Electric. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Lithium Americas and 0 mentions for Ivanhoe Electric. Lithium Americas' average media sentiment score of 0.05 beat Ivanhoe Electric's score of 0.00 indicating that Lithium Americas is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ivanhoe Electric Neutral
Lithium Americas Neutral

Ivanhoe Electric has a beta of 2.427083, meaning that its stock price is 143% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lithium Americas has a beta of 1.25853, meaning that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ivanhoe Electric beats Lithium Americas on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Lithium Americas News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LAC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LAC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LAC vs. The Competition

MetricLithium AmericasOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$2.23BC$1.64BC$4.80BC$12.19B
Dividend YieldN/A6.55%4.99%6.19%
P/E Ratio-14.1128.1723.2036.94
Price / SalesN/A50,030.876,087.0210.45
Price / Cash10.9124.6324.2882.29
Price / Book1.195.579.064.47
Net Income-C$20.27MC$70.60MC$156.77MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-0.16%0.07%0.65%0.65%
1 Month Performance-8.10%-4.26%-3.61%-0.08%
1 Year Performance75.41%96.79%57.49%41.90%

Lithium Americas Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LAC
Lithium Americas
1.8469 of 5 stars
C$6.35
flat
C$8.25
+29.9%
+75.4%C$2.23BN/AN/A749
NXE
NexGen Energy
2.3536 of 5 stars
C$15.82
-0.6%
C$19.18
+21.3%
+52.9%C$10.47BN/AN/A77
TRQ
Turquoise Hill Resources
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$8.65BC$1.65B11.843,480
ERO
Ero Copper
1.7014 of 5 stars
C$43.45
+3.4%
C$45.00
+3.6%
+101.2%C$4.53BC$923.93M15.522,460
PVG
Pretium Resources
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$3.60BC$611.14MN/A112

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:LAC) was last updated on 6/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners