Free Trial

Lithium Americas (LAC) Competitors

Lithium Americas logo
C$7.50 -0.03 (-0.40%)
As of 04:26 PM Eastern

LAC vs. TRQ, ERO, PVG, IE, and BCB

Should you be buying Lithium Americas stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Lithium Americas include Turquoise Hill Resources (TRQ), Ero Copper (ERO), Pretium Resources (PVG), Ivanhoe Electric (IE), and Cott (BCB). These companies are all part of the "non-metallic and industrial metal mining" industry.

How does Lithium Americas compare to Turquoise Hill Resources?

Lithium Americas (TSE:LAC) and Turquoise Hill Resources (TSE:TRQ) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Lithium Americas had 3 more articles in the media than Turquoise Hill Resources. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Lithium Americas and 0 mentions for Turquoise Hill Resources. Lithium Americas' average media sentiment score of 0.18 beat Turquoise Hill Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Lithium Americas is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lithium Americas Neutral
Turquoise Hill Resources Neutral

Turquoise Hill Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Lithium Americas. Lithium Americas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Turquoise Hill Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lithium AmericasN/AN/A-C$20.27M-C$0.50N/A
Turquoise Hill ResourcesC$1.65B0.00C$730.47MC$3.63N/A

Lithium Americas presently has a consensus price target of C$7.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.67%. Given Turquoise Hill Resources' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Turquoise Hill Resources is more favorable than Lithium Americas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lithium Americas
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.14
Turquoise Hill Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Lithium Americas has a net margin of 1,429,488,235.29% compared to Turquoise Hill Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Turquoise Hill Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Lithium Americas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lithium Americas1,429,488,235.29% -17.38% -3.41%
Turquoise Hill Resources N/A N/A N/A

18.3% of Lithium Americas shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.4% of Lithium Americas shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Lithium Americas and Turquoise Hill Resources tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas compare to Ero Copper?

Lithium Americas (TSE:LAC) and Ero Copper (TSE:ERO) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Ero Copper had 1 more articles in the media than Lithium Americas. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Ero Copper and 3 mentions for Lithium Americas. Ero Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.49 beat Lithium Americas' score of 0.18 indicating that Ero Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lithium Americas
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Ero Copper
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Ero Copper has higher revenue and earnings than Lithium Americas. Lithium Americas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ero Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lithium AmericasN/AN/A-C$20.27M-C$0.50N/A
Ero CopperC$785.84M4.66C$10.88MC$2.5313.89

Lithium Americas has a beta of 1.25853, indicating that its share price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ero Copper has a beta of 1.928061, indicating that its share price is 93% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Lithium Americas currently has a consensus price target of C$7.00, suggesting a potential downside of 6.67%. Ero Copper has a consensus price target of C$45.00, suggesting a potential upside of 28.06%. Given Ero Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ero Copper is more favorable than Lithium Americas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lithium Americas
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.14
Ero Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Lithium Americas has a net margin of 1,429,488,235.29% compared to Ero Copper's net margin of 33.50%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 31.58% beat Lithium Americas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lithium Americas1,429,488,235.29% -17.38% -3.41%
Ero Copper 33.50%31.58%3.46%

18.3% of Lithium Americas shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.0% of Ero Copper shares are held by institutional investors. 7.4% of Lithium Americas shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.4% of Ero Copper shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Ero Copper beats Lithium Americas on 15 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas compare to Pretium Resources?

Lithium Americas (TSE:LAC) and Pretium Resources (TSE:PVG) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Lithium Americas has a net margin of 1,429,488,235.29% compared to Pretium Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Pretium Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Lithium Americas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lithium Americas1,429,488,235.29% -17.38% -3.41%
Pretium Resources N/A N/A N/A

Lithium Americas currently has a consensus price target of C$7.00, suggesting a potential downside of 6.67%. Given Pretium Resources' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Pretium Resources is more favorable than Lithium Americas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lithium Americas
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.14
Pretium Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

18.3% of Lithium Americas shares are held by institutional investors. 7.4% of Lithium Americas shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Lithium Americas had 3 more articles in the media than Pretium Resources. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Lithium Americas and 0 mentions for Pretium Resources. Lithium Americas' average media sentiment score of 0.18 beat Pretium Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Lithium Americas is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lithium Americas Neutral
Pretium Resources Neutral

Lithium Americas has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pretium Resources. Lithium Americas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pretium Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lithium AmericasN/AN/A-C$20.27M-C$0.50N/A
Pretium ResourcesC$611.14M0.00-C$46.98M-C$0.25N/A

Summary

Lithium Americas beats Pretium Resources on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas compare to Ivanhoe Electric?

Ivanhoe Electric (TSE:IE) and Lithium Americas (TSE:LAC) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Lithium Americas has a net margin of 1,429,488,235.29% compared to Ivanhoe Electric's net margin of -3,263.69%. Lithium Americas' return on equity of -17.38% beat Ivanhoe Electric's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ivanhoe Electric-3,263.69% -32.66% -34.41%
Lithium Americas 1,429,488,235.29%-17.38%-3.41%

Ivanhoe Electric currently has a consensus price target of C$26.25, suggesting a potential upside of 50.69%. Lithium Americas has a consensus price target of C$7.00, suggesting a potential downside of 6.67%. Given Ivanhoe Electric's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Ivanhoe Electric is more favorable than Lithium Americas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ivanhoe Electric
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25
Lithium Americas
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.14

59.2% of Ivanhoe Electric shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.3% of Lithium Americas shares are held by institutional investors. 37.1% of Ivanhoe Electric shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of Lithium Americas shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Lithium Americas had 3 more articles in the media than Ivanhoe Electric. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Lithium Americas and 0 mentions for Ivanhoe Electric. Lithium Americas' average media sentiment score of 0.18 beat Ivanhoe Electric's score of 0.00 indicating that Lithium Americas is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ivanhoe Electric Neutral
Lithium Americas Neutral

Lithium Americas has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ivanhoe Electric. Ivanhoe Electric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lithium Americas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ivanhoe ElectricC$3.24M848.40-C$137.37M-C$0.79N/A
Lithium AmericasN/AN/A-C$20.27M-C$0.50N/A

Ivanhoe Electric has a beta of 2.080582, indicating that its stock price is 108% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lithium Americas has a beta of 1.25853, indicating that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Ivanhoe Electric and Lithium Americas tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithium Americas compare to Cott?

Cott (TSE:BCB) and Lithium Americas (TSE:LAC) are both mid-cap non-metallic and industrial metal mining companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Lithium Americas has a net margin of 1,429,488,235.29% compared to Cott's net margin of 0.00%. Cott's return on equity of 0.00% beat Lithium Americas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CottN/A N/A N/A
Lithium Americas 1,429,488,235.29%-17.38%-3.41%

Lithium Americas has a consensus price target of C$7.00, suggesting a potential downside of 6.67%. Given Cott's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Cott is more favorable than Lithium Americas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cott
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Lithium Americas
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.14

In the previous week, Lithium Americas had 3 more articles in the media than Cott. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Lithium Americas and 0 mentions for Cott. Lithium Americas' average media sentiment score of 0.18 beat Cott's score of 0.00 indicating that Lithium Americas is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cott Neutral
Lithium Americas Neutral

18.3% of Lithium Americas shares are held by institutional investors. 7.4% of Lithium Americas shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cott has higher revenue and earnings than Lithium Americas. Lithium Americas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CottC$2.39B0.00C$2.71MC$0.02N/A
Lithium AmericasN/AN/A-C$20.27M-C$0.50N/A

Summary

Cott and Lithium Americas tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Lithium Americas News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LAC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LAC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LAC vs. The Competition

MetricLithium AmericasOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$2.61BC$1.50BC$4.72BC$11.72B
Dividend YieldN/A6.56%4.98%6.22%
P/E Ratio-15.0025.4120.9723.83
Price / SalesN/A61,459.687,351.2713.46
Price / Cash10.9124.6324.3582.69
Price / Book1.499.697.704.48
Net Income-C$20.27MC$70.60MC$159.29MC$300.68M
7 Day Performance11.61%-0.46%0.01%0.12%
1 Month Performance33.45%4.30%2.58%2.88%
1 Year Performance83.82%110.49%76.05%57.78%

Lithium Americas Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LAC
Lithium Americas
0.4659 of 5 stars
C$7.50
-0.4%
C$7.00
-6.7%
N/AC$2.61BN/AN/A749
TRQ
Turquoise Hill Resources
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$8.65BC$1.65B11.843,480
ERO
Ero Copper
3.2665 of 5 stars
C$36.43
-2.9%
C$45.00
+23.5%
N/AC$3.80BC$785.84M14.402,460
PVG
Pretium Resources
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$3.60BC$611.14MN/A112
IE
Ivanhoe Electric
1.4908 of 5 stars
C$18.26
-2.7%
C$26.25
+43.8%
N/AC$2.88BC$3.24MN/A244

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:LAC) was last updated on 5/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners