Go Pro
→ Trump's New Dollar (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free MPC Stock Alerts

Madison Pacific Properties (MPC) Competitors

Madison Pacific Properties logo
C$4.75 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 07/10/2026 12:41 PM Eastern
Compare

MPC vs. VNR, OBE, CEI, NOA, and PHX

Should you buy Madison Pacific Properties stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Madison Pacific Properties with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Madison Pacific Properties include Valener (VNR), Obsidian Energy (OBE), Coelacanth Energy (CEI), North American Construction Group (NOA), and PHX Energy Services (PHX). These companies are all part of the "petroleum and natural gas" industry.

How does Madison Pacific Properties compare to Valener?

Madison Pacific Properties (TSE:MPC) and Valener (TSE:VNR) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Valener has higher revenue and earnings than Madison Pacific Properties. Valener is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Madison Pacific Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Madison Pacific PropertiesC$46.79M6.04-C$41.81MC$0.529.13
ValenerC$86.25M0.00C$57.68MC$1.47N/A

0.0% of Madison Pacific Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 75.1% of Madison Pacific Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Madison Pacific Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Valener'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Madison Pacific Properties Neutral
Valener Neutral

Madison Pacific Properties has a net margin of 66.87% compared to Valener's net margin of 0.00%. Madison Pacific Properties' return on equity of 7.55% beat Valener's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Madison Pacific Properties66.87% 7.55% 1.63%
Valener N/A N/A N/A

Madison Pacific Properties pays an annual dividend of C$0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Valener pays an annual dividend of C$1.19 per share. Madison Pacific Properties pays out 20.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Valener pays out 81.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Madison Pacific Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Madison Pacific Properties beats Valener on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Madison Pacific Properties compare to Obsidian Energy?

Obsidian Energy (TSE:OBE) and Madison Pacific Properties (TSE:MPC) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

In the previous week, Obsidian Energy had 8 more articles in the media than Madison Pacific Properties. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Obsidian Energy and 0 mentions for Madison Pacific Properties. Obsidian Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Madison Pacific Properties' score of 0.00 indicating that Obsidian Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Obsidian Energy Positive
Madison Pacific Properties Neutral

Madison Pacific Properties has a net margin of 66.87% compared to Obsidian Energy's net margin of 0.21%. Madison Pacific Properties' return on equity of 7.55% beat Obsidian Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Obsidian Energy0.21% 0.08% 4.88%
Madison Pacific Properties 66.87%7.55%1.63%

8.4% of Obsidian Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Madison Pacific Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Obsidian Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 75.1% of Madison Pacific Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Obsidian Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Madison Pacific Properties. Madison Pacific Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Obsidian Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Obsidian EnergyC$549.60M1.60C$116.66MC$0.011,316.00
Madison Pacific PropertiesC$46.79M6.04-C$41.81MC$0.529.13

Obsidian Energy has a beta of -0.295173, indicating that its share price is 130% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Madison Pacific Properties has a beta of 0.008245, indicating that its share price is 99% less volatile than the broader market.

Obsidian Energy presently has a consensus target price of C$14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 6.38%. Given Obsidian Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Obsidian Energy is more favorable than Madison Pacific Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Obsidian Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Madison Pacific Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Obsidian Energy beats Madison Pacific Properties on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Madison Pacific Properties compare to Coelacanth Energy?

Madison Pacific Properties (TSE:MPC) and Coelacanth Energy (CVE:CEI) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Madison Pacific Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Coelacanth Energy'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Madison Pacific Properties Neutral
Coelacanth Energy Neutral

Coelacanth Energy has a consensus price target of C$1.15, indicating a potential upside of 47.44%. Given Coelacanth Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Coelacanth Energy is more favorable than Madison Pacific Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Madison Pacific Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Coelacanth Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00

Coelacanth Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Madison Pacific Properties.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Madison Pacific PropertiesC$46.79M6.04-C$41.81MC$0.529.13
Coelacanth EnergyC$49.97M9.89-C$6.75MN/AN/A

Madison Pacific Properties has a net margin of 66.87% compared to Coelacanth Energy's net margin of -7.45%. Madison Pacific Properties' return on equity of 7.55% beat Coelacanth Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Madison Pacific Properties66.87% 7.55% 1.63%
Coelacanth Energy -7.45%-2.18%-3.98%

Madison Pacific Properties has a beta of 0.008245, meaning that its share price is 99% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Coelacanth Energy has a beta of 0.209883, meaning that its share price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

0.0% of Madison Pacific Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of Coelacanth Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 75.1% of Madison Pacific Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 31.6% of Coelacanth Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Coelacanth Energy beats Madison Pacific Properties on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Madison Pacific Properties compare to North American Construction Group?

Madison Pacific Properties (TSE:MPC) and North American Construction Group (TSE:NOA) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

0.0% of Madison Pacific Properties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.0% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. 75.1% of Madison Pacific Properties shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.9% of North American Construction Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Madison Pacific Properties has a net margin of 66.87% compared to North American Construction Group's net margin of 2.63%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 7.69% beat Madison Pacific Properties' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Madison Pacific Properties66.87% 7.55% 1.63%
North American Construction Group 2.63%7.69%6.65%

Madison Pacific Properties pays an annual dividend of C$0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. North American Construction Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Madison Pacific Properties pays out 20.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. North American Construction Group pays out 42.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Madison Pacific Properties. Madison Pacific Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Madison Pacific PropertiesC$46.79M6.04-C$41.81MC$0.529.13
North American Construction GroupC$1.26B0.41C$56.80MC$1.1216.96

Madison Pacific Properties has a beta of 0.008245, meaning that its share price is 99% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, North American Construction Group has a beta of 0.886746, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

North American Construction Group has a consensus price target of C$22.71, indicating a potential upside of 19.55%. Given North American Construction Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Madison Pacific Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Madison Pacific Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
North American Construction Group
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

In the previous week, North American Construction Group had 6 more articles in the media than Madison Pacific Properties. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for North American Construction Group and 0 mentions for Madison Pacific Properties. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 1.53 beat Madison Pacific Properties' score of 0.00 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Madison Pacific Properties Neutral
North American Construction Group Very Positive

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Madison Pacific Properties on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Madison Pacific Properties compare to PHX Energy Services?

PHX Energy Services (TSE:PHX) and Madison Pacific Properties (TSE:MPC) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

PHX Energy Services pays an annual dividend of C$0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.6%. Madison Pacific Properties pays an annual dividend of C$0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. PHX Energy Services pays out 89.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Madison Pacific Properties pays out 20.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

12.9% of PHX Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Madison Pacific Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 11.9% of PHX Energy Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 75.1% of Madison Pacific Properties shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Madison Pacific Properties has a net margin of 66.87% compared to PHX Energy Services' net margin of 6.21%. PHX Energy Services' return on equity of 19.38% beat Madison Pacific Properties' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PHX Energy Services6.21% 19.38% 10.65%
Madison Pacific Properties 66.87%7.55%1.63%

PHX Energy Services currently has a consensus price target of C$11.13, suggesting a potential upside of 5.15%. Given PHX Energy Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe PHX Energy Services is more favorable than Madison Pacific Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PHX Energy Services
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Madison Pacific Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

PHX Energy Services has a beta of 1.098499, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Madison Pacific Properties has a beta of 0.008245, indicating that its share price is 99% less volatile than the broader market.

PHX Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Madison Pacific Properties. Madison Pacific Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHX Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PHX Energy ServicesC$699.78M0.69C$72.75MC$0.8911.89
Madison Pacific PropertiesC$46.79M6.04-C$41.81MC$0.529.13

In the previous week, PHX Energy Services had 1 more articles in the media than Madison Pacific Properties. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for PHX Energy Services and 0 mentions for Madison Pacific Properties. PHX Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Madison Pacific Properties'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
PHX Energy Services Neutral
Madison Pacific Properties Neutral

Summary

PHX Energy Services beats Madison Pacific Properties on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Madison Pacific Properties News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MPC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MPC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MPC vs. The Competition

Export
MetricMadison Pacific PropertiesReal Estate Services IndustryReal Estate SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$282.45MC$1.81BC$2.01BC$12.31B
Dividend Yield2.21%4.63%7.03%6.17%
P/E Ratio9.139.6029.8836.52
Price / Sales6.04246.63408.299.88
Price / Cash8.9219.4368.3682.29
Price / Book0.642.211.374.51
Net Income-C$41.81M-C$431.59M-C$125.49MC$299.09M
7 Day PerformanceN/A-1.24%-0.45%0.23%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-2.39%-0.20%-0.11%
1 Year Performance-1.04%-11.79%-1.42%32.34%

Madison Pacific Properties Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MPC
Madison Pacific Properties
N/AC$4.75
flat		N/AN/AC$282.45MC$46.79M9.1317,800
VNR
Valener
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$1.02BC$86.25M17.73381
OBE
Obsidian Energy
3.812 of 5 stars		C$11.44
+0.7%		C$14.00
+22.4%		+66.4%C$763.93MC$549.60M1,144.00190
CEI
Coelacanth Energy
N/AC$0.81
+0.6%		C$1.10
+36.6%		-7.1%C$506.93MC$49.97MN/A9
NOA
North American Construction Group
4.7264 of 5 stars		C$18.53
+1.3%		C$22.71
+22.6%		-11.6%C$502.22MC$1.26B16.54200

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:MPC) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
They told you not to miss this one
The largest companies in the SP 500 are now more overvalued relative to fundamentals than they were at the abs...
Thor Metals | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
The 1934 playbook
In 1934, a legal government maneuver transferred billions in wealth overnight. Most Americans never saw it com...
American Alternative | Sponsoredtc pixel
American’s Biggest Threat Is Here
This feels like one of those ''where were you when Kennedy was shot'' moments. It felt like a moment in time, ...
Goldco Direct, LLC | Sponsoredtc pixel
They proved it worked in '76. Then buried it.
In 1976, Chevron tapped an energy source with no fuel costs, no carbon, and no supply chain - then killed the ...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
This Is How Financial Freedom Dies—And Most People Never See It Coming
While the trade war grabs headlines, the Department of Justice has quietly argued in court that cash may not b...
Priority Gold | Sponsoredtc pixel