Free Trial
→ Before you buy SpaceX shares, consider this alternative approach (From Weiss Ratings) (Ad)tc pixel Free MPC Stock Alerts

Madison Pacific Properties (MPC) Competitors

Madison Pacific Properties logo
C$5.30 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 05/13/2026
Compare

MPC vs. OBE, VNR, NOA, CEI, and PHX

Should you buy Madison Pacific Properties stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Madison Pacific Properties with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Madison Pacific Properties include Obsidian Energy (OBE), Valener (VNR), North American Construction Group (NOA), Coelacanth Energy (CEI), and PHX Energy Services (PHX). These companies are all part of the "petroleum and natural gas" industry.

How does Madison Pacific Properties compare to Obsidian Energy?

Obsidian Energy (TSE:OBE) and Madison Pacific Properties (TSE:MPC) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, earnings and valuation.

In the previous week, Obsidian Energy had 7 more articles in the media than Madison Pacific Properties. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Obsidian Energy and 0 mentions for Madison Pacific Properties. Obsidian Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Madison Pacific Properties' score of 0.00 indicating that Obsidian Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Obsidian Energy Positive
Madison Pacific Properties Neutral

Obsidian Energy presently has a consensus target price of C$13.67, indicating a potential downside of 24.16%. Given Obsidian Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Obsidian Energy is more favorable than Madison Pacific Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Obsidian Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Madison Pacific Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

7.7% of Obsidian Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Madison Pacific Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Obsidian Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 75.1% of Madison Pacific Properties shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Obsidian Energy has a beta of -0.20877, meaning that its stock price is 121% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Madison Pacific Properties has a beta of 0.290764, meaning that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

Madison Pacific Properties has a net margin of 57.06% compared to Obsidian Energy's net margin of 0.21%. Madison Pacific Properties' return on equity of 6.33% beat Obsidian Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Obsidian Energy0.21% 0.08% 4.88%
Madison Pacific Properties 57.06%6.33%1.63%

Obsidian Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Madison Pacific Properties. Madison Pacific Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Obsidian Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Obsidian EnergyC$549.60M2.22C$116.66MC$0.011,802.00
Madison Pacific PropertiesC$45.82M6.88-C$41.81MC$0.4412.05

Summary

Obsidian Energy beats Madison Pacific Properties on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Madison Pacific Properties compare to Valener?

Madison Pacific Properties (TSE:MPC) and Valener (TSE:VNR) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Madison Pacific Properties pays an annual dividend of C$0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Valener pays an annual dividend of C$1.19 per share. Madison Pacific Properties pays out 23.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Valener pays out 81.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Madison Pacific Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

0.0% of Madison Pacific Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 75.1% of Madison Pacific Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valener has higher revenue and earnings than Madison Pacific Properties. Valener is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Madison Pacific Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Madison Pacific PropertiesC$45.82M6.88-C$41.81MC$0.4412.05
ValenerC$86.25M0.00C$57.68MC$1.47N/A

Madison Pacific Properties has a net margin of 57.06% compared to Valener's net margin of 0.00%. Madison Pacific Properties' return on equity of 6.33% beat Valener's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Madison Pacific Properties57.06% 6.33% 1.63%
Valener N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Madison Pacific Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Valener'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Madison Pacific Properties Neutral
Valener Neutral

Summary

Madison Pacific Properties beats Valener on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Madison Pacific Properties compare to North American Construction Group?

North American Construction Group (TSE:NOA) and Madison Pacific Properties (TSE:MPC) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

North American Construction Group presently has a consensus target price of C$22.71, suggesting a potential upside of 5.06%. Given North American Construction Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Madison Pacific Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
North American Construction Group
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Madison Pacific Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, North American Construction Group had 3 more articles in the media than Madison Pacific Properties. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for North American Construction Group and 0 mentions for Madison Pacific Properties. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Madison Pacific Properties' score of 0.00 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
North American Construction Group Positive
Madison Pacific Properties Neutral

24.9% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Madison Pacific Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 8.9% of North American Construction Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 75.1% of Madison Pacific Properties shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Madison Pacific Properties. Madison Pacific Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
North American Construction GroupC$1.28B0.48C$56.80MC$1.1418.96
Madison Pacific PropertiesC$45.82M6.88-C$41.81MC$0.4412.05

North American Construction Group has a beta of 0.861491, suggesting that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Madison Pacific Properties has a beta of 0.290764, suggesting that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

North American Construction Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Madison Pacific Properties pays an annual dividend of C$0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. North American Construction Group pays out 42.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Madison Pacific Properties pays out 23.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Madison Pacific Properties has a net margin of 57.06% compared to North American Construction Group's net margin of 2.63%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 7.88% beat Madison Pacific Properties' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
North American Construction Group2.63% 7.88% 6.65%
Madison Pacific Properties 57.06%6.33%1.63%

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Madison Pacific Properties on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Madison Pacific Properties compare to Coelacanth Energy?

Madison Pacific Properties (TSE:MPC) and Coelacanth Energy (CVE:CEI) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

In the previous week, Madison Pacific Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Coelacanth Energy'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Madison Pacific Properties Neutral
Coelacanth Energy Neutral

0.0% of Madison Pacific Properties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.0% of Coelacanth Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 75.1% of Madison Pacific Properties shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 31.6% of Coelacanth Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Coelacanth Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Madison Pacific Properties. Coelacanth Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Madison Pacific Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Madison Pacific PropertiesC$45.82M6.88-C$41.81MC$0.4412.05
Coelacanth EnergyC$30.47M17.05-C$6.75M-C$0.02N/A

Coelacanth Energy has a consensus target price of C$1.10, suggesting a potential upside of 34.15%. Given Coelacanth Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Coelacanth Energy is more favorable than Madison Pacific Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Madison Pacific Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Coelacanth Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00

Madison Pacific Properties has a beta of 0.290764, meaning that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Coelacanth Energy has a beta of 0.309113, meaning that its share price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

Madison Pacific Properties has a net margin of 57.06% compared to Coelacanth Energy's net margin of -36.19%. Madison Pacific Properties' return on equity of 6.33% beat Coelacanth Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Madison Pacific Properties57.06% 6.33% 1.63%
Coelacanth Energy -36.19%-6.74%-3.98%

Summary

Madison Pacific Properties and Coelacanth Energy tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Madison Pacific Properties compare to PHX Energy Services?

PHX Energy Services (TSE:PHX) and Madison Pacific Properties (TSE:MPC) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Madison Pacific Properties has a net margin of 57.06% compared to PHX Energy Services' net margin of 6.21%. PHX Energy Services' return on equity of 19.38% beat Madison Pacific Properties' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PHX Energy Services6.21% 19.38% 10.65%
Madison Pacific Properties 57.06%6.33%1.63%

In the previous week, PHX Energy Services had 8 more articles in the media than Madison Pacific Properties. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for PHX Energy Services and 0 mentions for Madison Pacific Properties. Madison Pacific Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat PHX Energy Services' score of -1.51 indicating that Madison Pacific Properties is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
PHX Energy Services Very Negative
Madison Pacific Properties Neutral

PHX Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Madison Pacific Properties. Madison Pacific Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHX Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PHX Energy ServicesC$699.78M0.73C$72.75MC$0.8912.73
Madison Pacific PropertiesC$45.82M6.88-C$41.81MC$0.4412.05

15.7% of PHX Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Madison Pacific Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.9% of PHX Energy Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 75.1% of Madison Pacific Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

PHX Energy Services pays an annual dividend of C$0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.1%. Madison Pacific Properties pays an annual dividend of C$0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. PHX Energy Services pays out 89.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Madison Pacific Properties pays out 23.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

PHX Energy Services currently has a consensus target price of C$11.13, suggesting a potential downside of 1.81%. Given PHX Energy Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe PHX Energy Services is more favorable than Madison Pacific Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PHX Energy Services
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Madison Pacific Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

PHX Energy Services has a beta of 1.349647, suggesting that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Madison Pacific Properties has a beta of 0.290764, suggesting that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

PHX Energy Services beats Madison Pacific Properties on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Madison Pacific Properties News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MPC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MPC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MPC vs. The Competition

Export
MetricMadison Pacific PropertiesReal Estate Services IndustryReal Estate SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$315.15MC$1.84BC$1.95BC$11.97B
Dividend Yield1.98%5.38%6.93%6.22%
P/E Ratio12.059.3027.1936.97
Price / Sales6.88457.46843.6512.07
Price / Cash8.9219.2668.0682.42
Price / Book0.822.121.304.62
Net Income-C$41.81M-C$421.39M-C$124.57MC$299.62M
7 Day PerformanceN/A-0.30%-0.63%0.84%
1 Month Performance10.19%-1.11%-0.21%1.26%
1 Year PerformanceN/A-2.41%3.93%58.29%

Madison Pacific Properties Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MPC
Madison Pacific Properties
N/AC$5.30
flat		N/AN/AC$315.15MC$45.82M12.0517,800
OBE
Obsidian Energy
2.4023 of 5 stars		C$16.99
-2.4%		C$13.67
-19.6%		+149.8%C$1.18BC$549.60M34.67190
VNR
Valener
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$1.02BC$86.25M17.73381
NOA
North American Construction Group
2.8219 of 5 stars		C$20.09
+1.5%		C$22.43
+11.6%		-13.4%C$562.61MC$1.28B17.62200
CEI
Coelacanth Energy
N/AC$0.83
flat		C$1.10
+32.5%		+0.0%C$525.94MC$30.47MN/A9

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:MPC) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Before you buy SpaceX shares, consider this alternative approach
SpaceX has confidentially filed for an IPO with the SEC, targeting a June 2026 listing at a valuation exceedin...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
I’m sounding the alarm
Meta is cutting 10% of its workforce. Microsoft offered voluntary retirement to 7% of U.S. employees. Oracle, ...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Musk's acquisition pattern points to ONE stock
Musk needed solar - he acquired SolarCity. Needed data - he bought Twitter. The pattern is clear: when a suppl...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Just Named His Secret AI Project. It's Called "Golden Dawn."
Behind a hidden government lab in Tennessee, 40,000 scientists are reportedly finishing work on an AI system d...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
This is the worst news for stocks in 50 years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are issuing a rare warning: what's ahead for U.S. stocks could be the worst e...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Satellite Images Spot Potential $10 Trillion Discovery
'Dark Energy': Elon Musk's Next Potential $10 Trillion Move A highly secure site in West Texas now houses a...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
After “33X” call, Jon Najarian reveals NEW Tesla prediction…
Jon Najarian called Tesla a buy in 2014 before the stock climbed as high as 3,392%. He also called Palantir on...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel