Free Trial

North American Construction Group (NOA) Competitors

North American Construction Group logo
C$18.92 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 06/12/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

NOA vs. AAV, GBR, OBE, VNR, and CEI

Should you buy North American Construction Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares North American Construction Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with North American Construction Group include Advantage Energy (AAV), Great Bear Resources (GBR), Obsidian Energy (OBE), Valener (VNR), and Coelacanth Energy (CEI). These companies are all part of the "petroleum and natural gas" industry.

How does North American Construction Group compare to Advantage Energy?

Advantage Energy (TSE:AAV) and North American Construction Group (TSE:NOA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and risk.

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Advantage Energy. Advantage Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Advantage EnergyC$691.07M2.40C$45.34MC$0.6515.18
North American Construction GroupC$1.26B0.41C$56.80MC$1.1216.89

In the previous week, North American Construction Group had 1 more articles in the media than Advantage Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for North American Construction Group and 0 mentions for Advantage Energy. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Advantage Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Advantage Energy Neutral
North American Construction Group Positive

44.2% of Advantage Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.0% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Advantage Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.9% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Advantage Energy has a net margin of 16.83% compared to North American Construction Group's net margin of 2.63%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 7.69% beat Advantage Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Advantage Energy16.83% 6.59% 3.86%
North American Construction Group 2.63%7.69%6.65%

Advantage Energy currently has a consensus target price of C$14.17, indicating a potential upside of 43.53%. North American Construction Group has a consensus target price of C$22.71, indicating a potential upside of 20.05%. Given Advantage Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Advantage Energy is more favorable than North American Construction Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Advantage Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
North American Construction Group
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

Advantage Energy has a beta of -0.415411, meaning that its stock price is 142% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, North American Construction Group has a beta of 0.907849, meaning that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Advantage Energy on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does North American Construction Group compare to Great Bear Resources?

Great Bear Resources (CVE:GBR) and North American Construction Group (TSE:NOA) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, North American Construction Group had 1 more articles in the media than Great Bear Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for North American Construction Group and 0 mentions for Great Bear Resources. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Great Bear Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Great Bear Resources Neutral
North American Construction Group Positive

23.0% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. 8.9% of North American Construction Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

North American Construction Group has a net margin of 2.63% compared to Great Bear Resources' net margin of 0.00%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 7.69% beat Great Bear Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Great Bear ResourcesN/A N/A N/A
North American Construction Group 2.63%7.69%6.65%

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Great Bear Resources. Great Bear Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great Bear ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-C$0.18N/A
North American Construction GroupC$1.26B0.41C$56.80MC$1.1216.89

North American Construction Group has a consensus target price of C$22.71, suggesting a potential upside of 20.05%. Given North American Construction Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Great Bear Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Great Bear Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
North American Construction Group
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Great Bear Resources on 14 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does North American Construction Group compare to Obsidian Energy?

Obsidian Energy (TSE:OBE) and North American Construction Group (TSE:NOA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends and earnings.

In the previous week, North American Construction Group had 1 more articles in the media than Obsidian Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for North American Construction Group and 0 mentions for Obsidian Energy. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Obsidian Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Obsidian Energy Neutral
North American Construction Group Positive

Obsidian Energy has a beta of -0.345999, indicating that its share price is 135% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, North American Construction Group has a beta of 0.907849, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

North American Construction Group has a net margin of 2.63% compared to Obsidian Energy's net margin of 0.21%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 7.69% beat Obsidian Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Obsidian Energy0.21% 0.08% 4.88%
North American Construction Group 2.63%7.69%6.65%

Obsidian Energy currently has a consensus target price of C$14.00, indicating a potential downside of 9.50%. North American Construction Group has a consensus target price of C$22.71, indicating a potential upside of 20.05%. Given North American Construction Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Obsidian Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Obsidian Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
North American Construction Group
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

Obsidian Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than North American Construction Group. North American Construction Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Obsidian Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Obsidian EnergyC$549.60M1.88C$116.66MC$0.011,547.00
North American Construction GroupC$1.26B0.41C$56.80MC$1.1216.89

8.2% of Obsidian Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.0% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Obsidian Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.9% of North American Construction Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Obsidian Energy on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does North American Construction Group compare to Valener?

North American Construction Group (TSE:NOA) and Valener (TSE:VNR) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

23.0% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.9% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

North American Construction Group currently has a consensus price target of C$22.71, indicating a potential upside of 20.05%. Given North American Construction Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Valener.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
North American Construction Group
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Valener
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, North American Construction Group had 1 more articles in the media than Valener. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for North American Construction Group and 0 mentions for Valener. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Valener's score of 0.00 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
North American Construction Group Positive
Valener Neutral

Valener has lower revenue, but higher earnings than North American Construction Group. Valener is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
North American Construction GroupC$1.26B0.41C$56.80MC$1.1216.89
ValenerC$86.25M0.00C$57.68MC$1.47N/A

North American Construction Group has a net margin of 2.63% compared to Valener's net margin of 0.00%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 7.69% beat Valener's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
North American Construction Group2.63% 7.69% 6.65%
Valener N/A N/A N/A

North American Construction Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Valener pays an annual dividend of C$1.19 per share. North American Construction Group pays out 42.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Valener pays out 81.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. North American Construction Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Valener on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does North American Construction Group compare to Coelacanth Energy?

North American Construction Group (TSE:NOA) and Coelacanth Energy (CVE:CEI) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

North American Construction Group has a net margin of 2.63% compared to Coelacanth Energy's net margin of -7.45%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 7.69% beat Coelacanth Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
North American Construction Group2.63% 7.69% 6.65%
Coelacanth Energy -7.45%-2.18%-3.98%

23.0% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.4% of Coelacanth Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 8.9% of North American Construction Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 31.6% of Coelacanth Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

North American Construction Group has a beta of 0.907849, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Coelacanth Energy has a beta of 0.255163, indicating that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

North American Construction Group currently has a consensus target price of C$22.71, indicating a potential upside of 20.05%. Coelacanth Energy has a consensus target price of C$1.10, indicating a potential upside of 34.15%. Given Coelacanth Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Coelacanth Energy is more favorable than North American Construction Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
North American Construction Group
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Coelacanth Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Coelacanth Energy.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
North American Construction GroupC$1.26B0.41C$56.80MC$1.1216.89
Coelacanth EnergyC$49.97M10.40-C$6.75MN/AN/A

In the previous week, North American Construction Group had 1 more articles in the media than Coelacanth Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for North American Construction Group and 0 mentions for Coelacanth Energy. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Coelacanth Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
North American Construction Group Positive
Coelacanth Energy Neutral

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Coelacanth Energy on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get North American Construction Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NOA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NOA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

NOA vs. The Competition

MetricNorth American Construction GroupOil & Gas Equipment & Services IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$512.79MC$543.60MC$10.14BC$12.19B
Dividend Yield2.54%19.58%10.42%6.19%
P/E Ratio16.8913.4720.3336.94
Price / Sales0.41122.93764.3810.45
Price / Cash20.5026.6937.2682.29
Price / Book1.102.174.254.47
Net IncomeC$56.80MC$38.57MC$4.24BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-3.27%0.38%-1.06%0.65%
1 Month Performance-9.99%1.00%-3.26%-0.08%
1 Year Performance-22.40%35.21%37.42%41.90%

North American Construction Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
NOA
North American Construction Group
4.4754 of 5 stars
C$18.92
flat
C$22.71
+20.1%
-22.4%C$512.79MC$1.26B16.89200
AAV
Advantage Energy
3.7268 of 5 stars
C$10.13
+0.6%
C$14.17
+39.8%
-18.6%C$1.70BC$691.07M15.5883
GBR
Great Bear Resources
N/AC$28.15
-2.3%
N/A+0.0%C$1.63BN/AN/A3
OBE
Obsidian Energy
1.1098 of 5 stars
C$15.41
+2.7%
C$14.00
-9.1%
+90.5%C$1.03BC$549.60M1,541.00190
VNR
Valener
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$1.02BC$86.25M17.73381

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:NOA) was last updated on 6/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners