Does the media prefer NOA or LAC?

In the previous week, North American Construction Group and North American Construction Group both had 1 articles in the media. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Lithium Americas' score of 0.75 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment North American Construction Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Lithium Americas 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

North American Construction Group (NOA) Competitors

C$18.51 +0.19 (+1.04%)

As of 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

NOA vs. CXB, LAC, LAR, NCX, and MDI

Should you buy North American Construction Group stock or one of its competitors? North American Construction Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Calibre Mining (CXB), Lithium Americas (LAC), Lithium Americas (Argentina) (LAR), NorthIsle Copper and Gold (NCX), and Major Drilling Group International (MDI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "diversified metals & mining" industry.

How does North American Construction Group compare to Calibre Mining?

North American Construction Group (TSE:NOA) and Calibre Mining (TSE:CXB) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and profitability.

North American Construction Group has a beta of 0.829922, meaning that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Calibre Mining has a beta of 2.08, meaning that its stock price is 108% more volatile than the broader market.

20.1% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.6% of Calibre Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 8.9% of North American Construction Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.3% of Calibre Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Calibre Mining has a net margin of 5.93% compared to North American Construction Group's net margin of 2.41%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 7.40% beat Calibre Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
North American Construction Group	2.41%	7.40%	6.65%
Calibre Mining	5.93%	4.58%	6.25%

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Calibre Mining. North American Construction Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Calibre Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
North American Construction Group	C$1.34B	0.37	C$56.80M	C$1.12	16.53
Calibre Mining	C$404.24M	4.45	C$22.75M	C$0.05	55.92

North American Construction Group currently has a consensus price target of C$22.71, suggesting a potential upside of 22.71%. Given North American Construction Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Calibre Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
North American Construction Group	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71
Calibre Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, North American Construction Group had 1 more articles in the media than Calibre Mining. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for North American Construction Group and 0 mentions for Calibre Mining. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Calibre Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
North American Construction Group	Positive
Calibre Mining	Neutral

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Calibre Mining on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does North American Construction Group compare to Lithium Americas?

North American Construction Group (TSE:NOA) and Lithium Americas (TSE:LAC) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends and institutional ownership.

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Lithium Americas. Lithium Americas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
North American Construction Group	C$1.34B	0.37	C$56.80M	C$1.12	16.53
Lithium Americas	N/A	N/A	-C$20.27M	-C$0.46	N/A

Lithium Americas has a net margin of 1,429,488,235.29% compared to North American Construction Group's net margin of 2.41%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 7.40% beat Lithium Americas' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
North American Construction Group	2.41%	7.40%	6.65%
Lithium Americas	1,429,488,235.29%	-8.92%	-3.41%

North American Construction Group has a beta of 0.829922, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lithium Americas has a beta of 1.25853, suggesting that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, North American Construction Group and North American Construction Group both had 1 articles in the media. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Lithium Americas' score of 0.75 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
North American Construction Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Lithium Americas	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

North American Construction Group currently has a consensus target price of C$22.71, indicating a potential upside of 22.71%. Lithium Americas has a consensus target price of C$8.25, indicating a potential upside of 100.73%. Given Lithium Americas' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Lithium Americas is more favorable than North American Construction Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
North American Construction Group	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71
Lithium Americas	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.22

20.1% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.4% of Lithium Americas shares are held by institutional investors. 8.9% of North American Construction Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of Lithium Americas shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Lithium Americas on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does North American Construction Group compare to Lithium Americas (Argentina)?

North American Construction Group (TSE:NOA) and Lithium Americas (Argentina) (TSE:LAR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

In the previous week, North American Construction Group had 1 more articles in the media than Lithium Americas (Argentina). MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for North American Construction Group and 0 mentions for Lithium Americas (Argentina). North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s score of 0.00 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
North American Construction Group	Positive
Lithium Americas (Argentina)	Neutral

North American Construction Group has a beta of 0.829922, meaning that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lithium Americas (Argentina) has a beta of 2.41836, meaning that its share price is 142% more volatile than the broader market.

North American Construction Group currently has a consensus target price of C$22.71, indicating a potential upside of 22.71%. Lithium Americas (Argentina) has a consensus target price of C$13.38, indicating a potential upside of 42.44%. Given Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Lithium Americas (Argentina) is more favorable than North American Construction Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
North American Construction Group	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71
Lithium Americas (Argentina)	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.50

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Lithium Americas (Argentina). Lithium Americas (Argentina) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
North American Construction Group	C$1.34B	0.37	C$56.80M	C$1.12	16.53
Lithium Americas (Argentina)	N/A	N/A	N/A	-C$0.34	N/A

20.1% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.3% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are held by institutional investors. 8.9% of North American Construction Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

North American Construction Group has a net margin of 2.41% compared to Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s net margin of 0.00%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 7.40% beat Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
North American Construction Group	2.41%	7.40%	6.65%
Lithium Americas (Argentina)	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Lithium Americas (Argentina) on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does North American Construction Group compare to NorthIsle Copper and Gold?

NorthIsle Copper and Gold (CVE:NCX) and North American Construction Group (TSE:NOA) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

NorthIsle Copper and Gold has a beta of 1.688481, meaning that its stock price is 69% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, North American Construction Group has a beta of 0.829922, meaning that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

North American Construction Group has a net margin of 2.41% compared to NorthIsle Copper and Gold's net margin of 0.00%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 7.40% beat NorthIsle Copper and Gold's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NorthIsle Copper and Gold	N/A	-27.24%	-31.83%
North American Construction Group	2.41%	7.40%	6.65%

In the previous week, North American Construction Group had 1 more articles in the media than NorthIsle Copper and Gold. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for North American Construction Group and 0 mentions for NorthIsle Copper and Gold. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat NorthIsle Copper and Gold's score of 0.00 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
NorthIsle Copper and Gold	Neutral
North American Construction Group	Positive

NorthIsle Copper and Gold currently has a consensus target price of C$6.25, suggesting a potential upside of 40.45%. North American Construction Group has a consensus target price of C$22.71, suggesting a potential upside of 22.71%. Given NorthIsle Copper and Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe NorthIsle Copper and Gold is more favorable than North American Construction Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NorthIsle Copper and Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.33
North American Construction Group	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than NorthIsle Copper and Gold. NorthIsle Copper and Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NorthIsle Copper and Gold	N/A	N/A	-C$9.83M	-C$0.08	N/A
North American Construction Group	C$1.34B	0.37	C$56.80M	C$1.12	16.53

8.0% of NorthIsle Copper and Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.1% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. 14.0% of NorthIsle Copper and Gold shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.9% of North American Construction Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

North American Construction Group beats NorthIsle Copper and Gold on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does North American Construction Group compare to Major Drilling Group International?

North American Construction Group (TSE:NOA) and Major Drilling Group International (TSE:MDI) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

North American Construction Group currently has a consensus target price of C$22.71, suggesting a potential upside of 22.71%. Major Drilling Group International has a consensus target price of C$21.00, suggesting a potential upside of 29.07%. Given Major Drilling Group International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Major Drilling Group International is more favorable than North American Construction Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
North American Construction Group	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71
Major Drilling Group International	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Major Drilling Group International had 2 more articles in the media than North American Construction Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Major Drilling Group International and 1 mentions for North American Construction Group. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Major Drilling Group International's score of 0.75 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
North American Construction Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Major Drilling Group International	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

North American Construction Group has a net margin of 2.41% compared to Major Drilling Group International's net margin of 2.40%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 7.40% beat Major Drilling Group International's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
North American Construction Group	2.41%	7.40%	6.65%
Major Drilling Group International	2.40%	3.91%	6.57%

North American Construction Group has a beta of 0.829922, suggesting that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Major Drilling Group International has a beta of 1.652419, suggesting that its share price is 65% more volatile than the broader market.

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Major Drilling Group International. North American Construction Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Major Drilling Group International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
North American Construction Group	C$1.34B	0.37	C$56.80M	C$1.12	16.53
Major Drilling Group International	C$889.08M	1.50	C$41.61M	C$0.26	62.58

20.1% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.4% of Major Drilling Group International shares are held by institutional investors. 8.9% of North American Construction Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Major Drilling Group International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Major Drilling Group International on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get North American Construction Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NOA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

NOA vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	North American Construction Group	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$498.18M	C$4.05B	C$5.07B	C$12.52B
Dividend Yield	2.58%	5.17%	4.68%	6.24%
P/E Ratio	16.53	25.49	26.12	39.46
Price / Sales	0.37	8,891.84	5,289.11	9.79
Price / Cash	20.50	29.58	26.98	82.29
Price / Book	1.04	12.73	10.62	4.71
Net Income	C$56.80M	C$125.14M	C$156.32M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-1.39%	-1.23%	-1.00%	-1.22%
1 Month Performance	-3.04%	23.98%	18.35%	4.88%
1 Year Performance	0.33%	56.13%	44.31%	28.61%

North American Construction Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
NOA North American Construction Group	4.5272 of 5 stars	C$18.51 +1.0%	C$22.71 +22.7%	-2.7%	C$498.18M	C$1.34B	16.53	200	Dividend Announcement
CXB Calibre Mining	N/A	C$2.99 flat	N/A	N/A	C$1.80B	C$404.24M	55.92	N/A
LAC Lithium Americas	2.0124 of 5 stars	C$4.45 -0.9%	C$8.25 +85.4%	+7.2%	C$1.63B	N/A	N/A	749	News Coverage
LAR Lithium Americas (Argentina)	1.3136 of 5 stars	C$9.33 +0.3%	C$13.38 +43.4%	+108.6%	C$1.53B	N/A	N/A	N/A
NCX NorthIsle Copper and Gold	1.5756 of 5 stars	C$4.30 -3.2%	C$6.25 +45.3%	+243.6%	C$1.48B	N/A	N/A	N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:NOA) was last updated on 9/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

North American Construction Group (NOA) Competitors

NOA vs. CXB, LAC, LAR, NCX, and MDI

How does North American Construction Group compare to Calibre Mining?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to Lithium Americas?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to Lithium Americas (Argentina)?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to NorthIsle Copper and Gold?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to Major Drilling Group International?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NOA vs. The Competition

North American Construction Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

North American Construction Group (NOA) Competitors

NOA vs. CXB, LAC, LAR, NCX, and MDI

How does North American Construction Group compare to Calibre Mining?

Which has more volatility & risk, NOA or CXB?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in NOA or CXB?

Is NOA or CXB more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, NOA or CXB?

Do analysts rate NOA or CXB?

Does the media prefer NOA or CXB?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to Lithium Americas?

Which has better earnings and valuation, NOA or LAC?

Is NOA or LAC more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, NOA or LAC?

Does the media prefer NOA or LAC?

Do analysts recommend NOA or LAC?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in NOA or LAC?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to Lithium Americas (Argentina)?

Does the media refer more to NOA or LAR?

Which has more risk and volatility, NOA or LAR?

Do analysts rate NOA or LAR?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, NOA or LAR?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in NOA or LAR?

Is NOA or LAR more profitable?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to NorthIsle Copper and Gold?

Which has more volatility and risk, NCX or NOA?

Is NCX or NOA more profitable?

Does the media favor NCX or NOA?

Do analysts prefer NCX or NOA?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, NCX or NOA?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of NCX or NOA?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to Major Drilling Group International?

Do analysts rate NOA or MDI?

Does the media prefer NOA or MDI?

Is NOA or MDI more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, NOA or MDI?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, NOA or MDI?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of NOA or MDI?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NOA vs. The Competition

North American Construction Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools