Which has better valuation and earnings, NOA or CEI?

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Coelacanth Energy. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio North American Construction Group C$1.26B 0.41 C$56.80M C$1.12 16.89 Coelacanth Energy C$49.97M 10.40 -C$6.75M N/A N/A

North American Construction Group (NOA) Competitors

C$18.92 +0.13 (+0.69%)

As of 06/12/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

NOA vs. AAV, GBR, OBE, VNR, and CEI

Should you buy North American Construction Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares North American Construction Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with North American Construction Group include Advantage Energy (AAV), Great Bear Resources (GBR), Obsidian Energy (OBE), Valener (VNR), and Coelacanth Energy (CEI). These companies are all part of the "petroleum and natural gas" industry.

How does North American Construction Group compare to Advantage Energy?

Advantage Energy (TSE:AAV) and North American Construction Group (TSE:NOA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.

44.2% of Advantage Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.0% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Advantage Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.9% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Advantage Energy has a beta of -0.415411, indicating that its stock price is 142% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, North American Construction Group has a beta of 0.907849, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Advantage Energy presently has a consensus price target of C$14.17, indicating a potential upside of 43.53%. North American Construction Group has a consensus price target of C$22.71, indicating a potential upside of 20.05%. Given Advantage Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Advantage Energy is more favorable than North American Construction Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Advantage Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
North American Construction Group	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63

In the previous week, North American Construction Group had 1 more articles in the media than Advantage Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for North American Construction Group and 0 mentions for Advantage Energy. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Advantage Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Advantage Energy	Neutral
North American Construction Group	Positive

Advantage Energy has a net margin of 16.83% compared to North American Construction Group's net margin of 2.63%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 7.69% beat Advantage Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Advantage Energy	16.83%	6.59%	3.86%
North American Construction Group	2.63%	7.69%	6.65%

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Advantage Energy. Advantage Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Advantage Energy	C$691.07M	2.40	C$45.34M	C$0.65	15.18
North American Construction Group	C$1.26B	0.41	C$56.80M	C$1.12	16.89

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Advantage Energy on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does North American Construction Group compare to Great Bear Resources?

North American Construction Group (TSE:NOA) and Great Bear Resources (CVE:GBR) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

23.0% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. 8.9% of North American Construction Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, North American Construction Group had 1 more articles in the media than Great Bear Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for North American Construction Group and 0 mentions for Great Bear Resources. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Great Bear Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
North American Construction Group	Positive
Great Bear Resources	Neutral

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Great Bear Resources. Great Bear Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
North American Construction Group	C$1.26B	0.41	C$56.80M	C$1.12	16.89
Great Bear Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A	-C$0.18	N/A

North American Construction Group currently has a consensus price target of C$22.71, suggesting a potential upside of 20.05%. Given North American Construction Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Great Bear Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
North American Construction Group	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
Great Bear Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

North American Construction Group has a net margin of 2.63% compared to Great Bear Resources' net margin of 0.00%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 7.69% beat Great Bear Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
North American Construction Group	2.63%	7.69%	6.65%
Great Bear Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Great Bear Resources on 14 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does North American Construction Group compare to Obsidian Energy?

North American Construction Group (TSE:NOA) and Obsidian Energy (TSE:OBE) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment and earnings.

North American Construction Group has a net margin of 2.63% compared to Obsidian Energy's net margin of 0.21%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 7.69% beat Obsidian Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
North American Construction Group	2.63%	7.69%	6.65%
Obsidian Energy	0.21%	0.08%	4.88%

North American Construction Group presently has a consensus price target of C$22.71, suggesting a potential upside of 20.05%. Obsidian Energy has a consensus price target of C$14.00, suggesting a potential downside of 9.50%. Given North American Construction Group's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Obsidian Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
North American Construction Group	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
Obsidian Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

23.0% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.2% of Obsidian Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.9% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Obsidian Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Obsidian Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than North American Construction Group. North American Construction Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Obsidian Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
North American Construction Group	C$1.26B	0.41	C$56.80M	C$1.12	16.89
Obsidian Energy	C$549.60M	1.88	C$116.66M	C$0.01	1,547.00

In the previous week, North American Construction Group had 1 more articles in the media than Obsidian Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for North American Construction Group and 0 mentions for Obsidian Energy. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Obsidian Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
North American Construction Group	Positive
Obsidian Energy	Neutral

North American Construction Group has a beta of 0.907849, suggesting that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Obsidian Energy has a beta of -0.345999, suggesting that its share price is 135% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Obsidian Energy on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does North American Construction Group compare to Valener?

North American Construction Group (TSE:NOA) and Valener (TSE:VNR) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Valener has lower revenue, but higher earnings than North American Construction Group. Valener is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
North American Construction Group	C$1.26B	0.41	C$56.80M	C$1.12	16.89
Valener	C$86.25M	0.00	C$57.68M	C$1.47	N/A

North American Construction Group has a net margin of 2.63% compared to Valener's net margin of 0.00%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 7.69% beat Valener's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
North American Construction Group	2.63%	7.69%	6.65%
Valener	N/A	N/A	N/A

23.0% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. 8.9% of North American Construction Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, North American Construction Group had 1 more articles in the media than Valener. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for North American Construction Group and 0 mentions for Valener. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Valener's score of 0.00 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
North American Construction Group	Positive
Valener	Neutral

North American Construction Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Valener pays an annual dividend of C$1.19 per share. North American Construction Group pays out 42.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Valener pays out 81.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. North American Construction Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

North American Construction Group currently has a consensus price target of C$22.71, indicating a potential upside of 20.05%. Given North American Construction Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Valener.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
North American Construction Group	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
Valener	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Valener on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does North American Construction Group compare to Coelacanth Energy?

North American Construction Group (TSE:NOA) and Coelacanth Energy (CVE:CEI) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment and valuation.

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Coelacanth Energy.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
North American Construction Group	C$1.26B	0.41	C$56.80M	C$1.12	16.89
Coelacanth Energy	C$49.97M	10.40	-C$6.75M	N/A	N/A

North American Construction Group has a net margin of 2.63% compared to Coelacanth Energy's net margin of -7.45%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 7.69% beat Coelacanth Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
North American Construction Group	2.63%	7.69%	6.65%
Coelacanth Energy	-7.45%	-2.18%	-3.98%

North American Construction Group presently has a consensus target price of C$22.71, suggesting a potential upside of 20.05%. Coelacanth Energy has a consensus target price of C$1.10, suggesting a potential upside of 34.15%. Given Coelacanth Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Coelacanth Energy is more favorable than North American Construction Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
North American Construction Group	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
Coelacanth Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00

North American Construction Group has a beta of 0.907849, meaning that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Coelacanth Energy has a beta of 0.255163, meaning that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, North American Construction Group had 1 more articles in the media than Coelacanth Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for North American Construction Group and 0 mentions for Coelacanth Energy. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Coelacanth Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
North American Construction Group	Positive
Coelacanth Energy	Neutral

23.0% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.4% of Coelacanth Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.9% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 31.6% of Coelacanth Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Coelacanth Energy on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get North American Construction Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NOA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

NOA vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	North American Construction Group	Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry	Energy Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$512.78M	C$542.79M	C$10.39B	C$13.03B
Dividend Yield	2.54%	19.58%	10.42%	6.19%
P/E Ratio	16.89	13.47	20.33	36.94
Price / Sales	0.41	122.93	764.38	10.45
Price / Cash	20.50	26.69	37.26	82.29
Price / Book	1.10	2.17	4.25	4.47
Net Income	C$56.80M	C$38.57M	C$4.24B	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-1.36%	0.41%	-0.28%	0.89%
1 Month Performance	-12.49%	0.62%	-2.86%	-1.07%
1 Year Performance	-22.40%	35.21%	37.45%	41.92%

North American Construction Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
NOA North American Construction Group	4.4754 of 5 stars	C$18.92 +0.7%	C$22.71 +20.1%	-22.4%	C$512.78M	C$1.26B	16.89	200
AAV Advantage Energy	3.7268 of 5 stars	C$10.13 +0.6%	C$14.17 +39.8%	-18.6%	C$1.70B	C$691.07M	15.58	83
GBR Great Bear Resources	N/A	C$28.15 -2.3%	N/A	+0.0%	C$1.63B	N/A	N/A	3	High Trading Volume
OBE Obsidian Energy	1.1119 of 5 stars	C$15.41 +2.7%	C$14.00 -9.1%	+90.5%	C$1.03B	C$549.60M	1,541.00	190
VNR Valener	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$1.02B	C$86.25M	17.73	381

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:NOA) was last updated on 6/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

North American Construction Group (NOA) Competitors

NOA vs. AAV, GBR, OBE, VNR, and CEI

How does North American Construction Group compare to Advantage Energy?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to Great Bear Resources?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to Obsidian Energy?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to Valener?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to Coelacanth Energy?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NOA vs. The Competition

North American Construction Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

North American Construction Group (NOA) Competitors

NOA vs. AAV, GBR, OBE, VNR, and CEI

How does North American Construction Group compare to Advantage Energy?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in AAV or NOA?

Which has more volatility & risk, AAV or NOA?

Do analysts recommend AAV or NOA?

Does the media prefer AAV or NOA?

Is AAV or NOA more profitable?

Which has better valuation & earnings, AAV or NOA?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to Great Bear Resources?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in NOA or GBR?

Does the media favor NOA or GBR?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, NOA or GBR?

Do analysts rate NOA or GBR?

Is NOA or GBR more profitable?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to Obsidian Energy?

Is NOA or OBE more profitable?

Do analysts rate NOA or OBE?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of NOA or OBE?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, NOA or OBE?

Does the media refer more to NOA or OBE?

Which has more volatility & risk, NOA or OBE?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to Valener?

Which has better earnings and valuation, NOA or VNR?

Is NOA or VNR more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of NOA or VNR?

Does the media refer more to NOA or VNR?

Is NOA or VNR a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend NOA or VNR?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to Coelacanth Energy?

Which has better valuation and earnings, NOA or CEI?

Is NOA or CEI more profitable?

Do analysts prefer NOA or CEI?

Which has more volatility and risk, NOA or CEI?

Does the media refer more to NOA or CEI?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of NOA or CEI?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NOA vs. The Competition

North American Construction Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools