North American Construction Group (NOA) Competitors

C$18.53 +0.24 (+1.31%)

As of 07/3/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

NOA vs. VET, AAV, GBR, VNR, and OBE

Should you buy North American Construction Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares North American Construction Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with North American Construction Group include Vermilion Energy (VET), Advantage Energy (AAV), Great Bear Resources (GBR), Valener (VNR), and Obsidian Energy (OBE). These companies are all part of the "petroleum and natural gas" industry.

How does North American Construction Group compare to Vermilion Energy?

Vermilion Energy (TSE:VET) and North American Construction Group (TSE:NOA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and profitability.

North American Construction Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vermilion Energy. Vermilion Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Vermilion Energy	C$1.92B	1.03	-C$822.19M	-C$5.30	N/A
North American Construction Group	C$1.26B	0.40	C$56.80M	C$1.12	16.54

Vermilion Energy has a beta of 0.22899, indicating that its share price is 77% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, North American Construction Group has a beta of 0.907849, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Vermilion Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.53 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. North American Construction Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Vermilion Energy pays out -9.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. North American Construction Group pays out 42.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Vermilion Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Vermilion Energy currently has a consensus price target of C$19.29, indicating a potential upside of 49.62%. North American Construction Group has a consensus price target of C$22.71, indicating a potential upside of 22.58%. Given Vermilion Energy's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Vermilion Energy is more favorable than North American Construction Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Vermilion Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29
North American Construction Group	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63

29.6% of Vermilion Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.0% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Vermilion Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.9% of North American Construction Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

North American Construction Group has a net margin of 2.63% compared to Vermilion Energy's net margin of -44.92%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 7.69% beat Vermilion Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Vermilion Energy	-44.92%	-33.68%	-5.53%
North American Construction Group	2.63%	7.69%	6.65%

In the previous week, Vermilion Energy had 1 more articles in the media than North American Construction Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Vermilion Energy and 0 mentions for North American Construction Group. Vermilion Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat North American Construction Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Vermilion Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Vermilion Energy	Positive
North American Construction Group	Neutral

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Vermilion Energy on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does North American Construction Group compare to Advantage Energy?

North American Construction Group (TSE:NOA) and Advantage Energy (TSE:AAV) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

North American Construction Group presently has a consensus price target of C$22.71, suggesting a potential upside of 22.58%. Advantage Energy has a consensus price target of C$14.17, suggesting a potential upside of 34.54%. Given Advantage Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Advantage Energy is more favorable than North American Construction Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
North American Construction Group	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
Advantage Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86

23.0% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.8% of Advantage Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 8.9% of North American Construction Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Advantage Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

North American Construction Group has a beta of 0.907849, suggesting that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Advantage Energy has a beta of -0.415411, suggesting that its stock price is 142% less volatile than the broader market.

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Advantage Energy. Advantage Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
North American Construction Group	C$1.26B	0.40	C$56.80M	C$1.12	16.54
Advantage Energy	C$691.07M	2.56	C$45.34M	C$0.65	16.20

In the previous week, Advantage Energy had 1 more articles in the media than North American Construction Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Advantage Energy and 0 mentions for North American Construction Group. Advantage Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat North American Construction Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Advantage Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
North American Construction Group	Neutral
Advantage Energy	Positive

Advantage Energy has a net margin of 16.83% compared to North American Construction Group's net margin of 2.63%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 7.69% beat Advantage Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
North American Construction Group	2.63%	7.69%	6.65%
Advantage Energy	16.83%	6.59%	3.86%

Summary

North American Construction Group and Advantage Energy tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does North American Construction Group compare to Great Bear Resources?

North American Construction Group (TSE:NOA) and Great Bear Resources (CVE:GBR) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Great Bear Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
North American Construction Group	Neutral
Great Bear Resources	Neutral

North American Construction Group has a net margin of 2.63% compared to Great Bear Resources' net margin of 0.00%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 7.69% beat Great Bear Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
North American Construction Group	2.63%	7.69%	6.65%
Great Bear Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Great Bear Resources. Great Bear Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
North American Construction Group	C$1.26B	0.40	C$56.80M	C$1.12	16.54
Great Bear Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A	-C$0.18	N/A

North American Construction Group presently has a consensus price target of C$22.71, indicating a potential upside of 22.58%. Given North American Construction Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Great Bear Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
North American Construction Group	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
Great Bear Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

23.0% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.9% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Great Bear Resources on 12 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does North American Construction Group compare to Valener?

Valener (TSE:VNR) and North American Construction Group (TSE:NOA) are both small-cap petroleum and natural gas companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

North American Construction Group has a consensus target price of C$22.71, indicating a potential upside of 22.58%. Given North American Construction Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Valener.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Valener	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
North American Construction Group	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63

23.0% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.9% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valener has higher earnings, but lower revenue than North American Construction Group. Valener is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Valener	C$86.25M	0.00	C$57.68M	C$1.47	N/A
North American Construction Group	C$1.26B	0.40	C$56.80M	C$1.12	16.54

Valener pays an annual dividend of C$1.19 per share. North American Construction Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Valener pays out 81.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. North American Construction Group pays out 42.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. North American Construction Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Valener's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled North American Construction Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Valener	Neutral
North American Construction Group	Neutral

North American Construction Group has a net margin of 2.63% compared to Valener's net margin of 0.00%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 7.69% beat Valener's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Valener	N/A	N/A	N/A
North American Construction Group	2.63%	7.69%	6.65%

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Valener on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does North American Construction Group compare to Obsidian Energy?

North American Construction Group (TSE:NOA) and Obsidian Energy (TSE:OBE) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Obsidian Energy'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
North American Construction Group	Neutral
Obsidian Energy	Neutral

North American Construction Group presently has a consensus target price of C$22.71, suggesting a potential upside of 22.58%. Obsidian Energy has a consensus target price of C$14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 22.38%. Given North American Construction Group's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Obsidian Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
North American Construction Group	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
Obsidian Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

North American Construction Group has a beta of 0.907849, meaning that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Obsidian Energy has a beta of -0.345999, meaning that its stock price is 135% less volatile than the broader market.

North American Construction Group has a net margin of 2.63% compared to Obsidian Energy's net margin of 0.21%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 7.69% beat Obsidian Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
North American Construction Group	2.63%	7.69%	6.65%
Obsidian Energy	0.21%	0.08%	4.88%

Obsidian Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than North American Construction Group. North American Construction Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Obsidian Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
North American Construction Group	C$1.26B	0.40	C$56.80M	C$1.12	16.54
Obsidian Energy	C$549.60M	1.39	C$116.66M	C$0.01	1,144.00

23.0% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.3% of Obsidian Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 8.9% of North American Construction Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Obsidian Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Obsidian Energy on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get North American Construction Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NOA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

NOA vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	North American Construction Group	Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry	Energy Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$502.22M	C$522.41M	C$9.73B	C$13.07B
Dividend Yield	2.55%	19.62%	10.67%	6.18%
P/E Ratio	16.54	13.04	18.37	36.51
Price / Sales	0.40	117.39	688.85	10.34
Price / Cash	20.50	26.69	37.98	82.29
Price / Book	1.08	2.12	4.09	4.52
Net Income	C$56.80M	C$38.57M	C$4.25B	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-3.69%	-0.70%	-0.16%	1.85%
1 Month Performance	-3.39%	-3.16%	-6.48%	1.71%
1 Year Performance	-17.57%	22.22%	26.94%	36.40%

North American Construction Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
NOA North American Construction Group	4.3341 of 5 stars	C$18.53 +1.3%	C$22.71 +22.6%	-17.6%	C$502.22M	C$1.26B	16.54	200	Positive News
VET Vermilion Energy	2.5717 of 5 stars	C$13.27 flat	C$19.29 +45.3%	+25.5%	C$2.03B	C$1.92B	N/A	720	News Coverage
AAV Advantage Energy	4.4937 of 5 stars	C$10.31 flat	C$14.17 +37.4%	-8.0%	C$1.73B	C$691.07M	15.86	83
GBR Great Bear Resources	N/A	C$28.15 -2.3%	N/A	+0.0%	C$1.63B	N/A	N/A	3	High Trading Volume
VNR Valener	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$1.02B	C$86.25M	17.73	381

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:NOA) was last updated on 7/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

North American Construction Group (NOA) Competitors

NOA vs. VET, AAV, GBR, VNR, and OBE

How does North American Construction Group compare to Vermilion Energy?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to Advantage Energy?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to Great Bear Resources?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to Valener?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to Obsidian Energy?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NOA vs. The Competition

North American Construction Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

North American Construction Group (NOA) Competitors

NOA vs. VET, AAV, GBR, VNR, and OBE

How does North American Construction Group compare to Vermilion Energy?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, VET or NOA?

Which has more risk & volatility, VET or NOA?

Is VET or NOA a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend VET or NOA?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in VET or NOA?

Is VET or NOA more profitable?

Does the media prefer VET or NOA?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to Advantage Energy?

Do analysts recommend NOA or AAV?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in NOA or AAV?

Which has more risk & volatility, NOA or AAV?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, NOA or AAV?

Does the media refer more to NOA or AAV?

Is NOA or AAV more profitable?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to Great Bear Resources?

Does the media favor NOA or GBR?

Is NOA or GBR more profitable?

Which has better earnings & valuation, NOA or GBR?

Do analysts recommend NOA or GBR?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in NOA or GBR?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to Valener?

Do analysts rate VNR or NOA?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in VNR or NOA?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, VNR or NOA?

Is VNR or NOA a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor VNR or NOA?

Is VNR or NOA more profitable?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to Obsidian Energy?

Does the media favor NOA or OBE?

Do analysts recommend NOA or OBE?

Which has more volatility and risk, NOA or OBE?

Is NOA or OBE more profitable?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, NOA or OBE?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in NOA or OBE?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NOA vs. The Competition

North American Construction Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools