Do analysts rate CFW or HIVE?

Calfrac Well Services presently has a consensus target price of C$7.75, suggesting a potential upside of 16.02%. Given Calfrac Well Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Calfrac Well Services is more favorable than HIVE Digital Technologies. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Calfrac Well Services 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 HIVE Digital Technologies 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Do analysts recommend VBNK or CFW?

Calfrac Well Services has a consensus target price of C$7.75, indicating a potential upside of 16.02%. Given Calfrac Well Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Calfrac Well Services is more favorable than VersaBank. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score VersaBank 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Calfrac Well Services 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Do analysts prefer WED or CFW?

Calfrac Well Services has a consensus target price of C$7.75, indicating a potential upside of 16.02%. Given Calfrac Well Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Calfrac Well Services is more favorable than Westaim. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Westaim 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Calfrac Well Services 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Does the media prefer WED or CFW?

In the previous week, Calfrac Well Services had 5 more articles in the media than Westaim. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Calfrac Well Services and 1 mentions for Westaim. Westaim's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Calfrac Well Services' score of -0.32 indicating that Westaim is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Westaim 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Calfrac Well Services 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend CFW or WFC?

Calfrac Well Services currently has a consensus price target of C$7.75, suggesting a potential upside of 16.02%. Given Calfrac Well Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Calfrac Well Services is more favorable than Wall Financial. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Calfrac Well Services 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Wall Financial 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Does the media refer more to CFW or WFC?

In the previous week, Calfrac Well Services had 3 more articles in the media than Wall Financial. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Calfrac Well Services and 3 mentions for Wall Financial. Wall Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Calfrac Well Services' score of -0.32 indicating that Wall Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Calfrac Well Services 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Wall Financial 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend CFW or PTS?

Calfrac Well Services currently has a consensus price target of C$7.75, suggesting a potential upside of 16.02%. Given Calfrac Well Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Calfrac Well Services is more favorable than Points.com. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Calfrac Well Services 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Points.com 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Calfrac Well Services (CFW) Competitors

$Calfrac Well Services logo$

C$6.68 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 06/12/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

CFW vs. HIVE, VBNK, WED, WFC, and PTS

Should you buy Calfrac Well Services stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Calfrac Well Services with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Calfrac Well Services include HIVE Digital Technologies (HIVE), VersaBank (VBNK), Westaim (WED), Wall Financial (WFC), and Points.com (PTS). These companies are all part of the "banking" industry.

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to HIVE Digital Technologies?

Calfrac Well Services (TSE:CFW) and HIVE Digital Technologies (CVE:HIVE) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Calfrac Well Services had 6 more articles in the media than HIVE Digital Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Calfrac Well Services and 0 mentions for HIVE Digital Technologies. HIVE Digital Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Calfrac Well Services' score of -0.32 indicating that HIVE Digital Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Calfrac Well Services	Neutral
HIVE Digital Technologies	Positive

Calfrac Well Services has a net margin of 3.29% compared to HIVE Digital Technologies' net margin of -28.29%. Calfrac Well Services' return on equity of 6.49% beat HIVE Digital Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Calfrac Well Services	3.29%	6.49%	6.32%
HIVE Digital Technologies	-28.29%	-13.39%	-8.78%

Calfrac Well Services has higher revenue and earnings than HIVE Digital Technologies. HIVE Digital Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Calfrac Well Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Calfrac Well Services	C$1.32B	0.51	C$27.97M	C$0.46	14.52
HIVE Digital Technologies	C$257.14M	4.04	-C$13.38M	-C$0.77	N/A

Calfrac Well Services has a beta of -0.442482, meaning that its stock price is 144% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HIVE Digital Technologies has a beta of 2.339164, meaning that its stock price is 134% more volatile than the broader market.

Calfrac Well Services presently has a consensus target price of C$7.75, suggesting a potential upside of 16.02%. Given Calfrac Well Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Calfrac Well Services is more favorable than HIVE Digital Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Calfrac Well Services	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
HIVE Digital Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

25.0% of Calfrac Well Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.2% of HIVE Digital Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 46.9% of Calfrac Well Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of HIVE Digital Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Calfrac Well Services beats HIVE Digital Technologies on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to VersaBank?

VersaBank (TSE:VBNK) and Calfrac Well Services (TSE:CFW) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

10.5% of VersaBank shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.0% of Calfrac Well Services shares are held by institutional investors. 38.8% of VersaBank shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 46.9% of Calfrac Well Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

VersaBank has a beta of 1.720188, indicating that its share price is 72% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Calfrac Well Services has a beta of -0.442482, indicating that its share price is 144% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Calfrac Well Services had 6 more articles in the media than VersaBank. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Calfrac Well Services and 0 mentions for VersaBank. VersaBank's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Calfrac Well Services' score of -0.32 indicating that VersaBank is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
VersaBank	Neutral
Calfrac Well Services	Neutral

Calfrac Well Services has a consensus target price of C$7.75, indicating a potential upside of 16.02%. Given Calfrac Well Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Calfrac Well Services is more favorable than VersaBank.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
VersaBank	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Calfrac Well Services	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

VersaBank has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Calfrac Well Services. Calfrac Well Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than VersaBank, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
VersaBank	C$141.48M	6.42	C$49.54M	C$0.94	30.00
Calfrac Well Services	C$1.32B	0.51	C$27.97M	C$0.46	14.52

VersaBank has a net margin of 9.34% compared to Calfrac Well Services' net margin of 3.29%. Calfrac Well Services' return on equity of 6.49% beat VersaBank's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
VersaBank	9.34%	5.64%	1.10%
Calfrac Well Services	3.29%	6.49%	6.32%

Summary

Calfrac Well Services beats VersaBank on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to Westaim?

Westaim (CVE:WED) and Calfrac Well Services (TSE:CFW) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

Calfrac Well Services has a consensus target price of C$7.75, indicating a potential upside of 16.02%. Given Calfrac Well Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Calfrac Well Services is more favorable than Westaim.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Westaim	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Calfrac Well Services	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

In the previous week, Calfrac Well Services had 5 more articles in the media than Westaim. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Calfrac Well Services and 1 mentions for Westaim. Westaim's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Calfrac Well Services' score of -0.32 indicating that Westaim is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Westaim	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Calfrac Well Services	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Calfrac Well Services has higher revenue and earnings than Westaim. Westaim is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Calfrac Well Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Westaim	C$84.96M	9.09	C$4.52M	-C$1.91	N/A
Calfrac Well Services	C$1.32B	0.51	C$27.97M	C$0.46	14.52

Calfrac Well Services has a net margin of 3.29% compared to Westaim's net margin of -67.85%. Calfrac Well Services' return on equity of 6.49% beat Westaim's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Westaim	-67.85%	-9.69%	7.60%
Calfrac Well Services	3.29%	6.49%	6.32%

16.7% of Westaim shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.0% of Calfrac Well Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.3% of Westaim shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 46.9% of Calfrac Well Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Westaim has a beta of -0.168602, meaning that its share price is 117% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Calfrac Well Services has a beta of -0.442482, meaning that its share price is 144% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Calfrac Well Services beats Westaim on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to Wall Financial?

Calfrac Well Services (TSE:CFW) and Wall Financial (TSE:WFC) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and valuation.

Calfrac Well Services has a beta of -0.442482, indicating that its share price is 144% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Wall Financial has a beta of 1.05787, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

Calfrac Well Services has higher revenue and earnings than Wall Financial. Calfrac Well Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wall Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Calfrac Well Services	C$1.32B	0.51	C$27.97M	C$0.46	14.52
Wall Financial	C$179.24M	3.33	C$24.83M	C$1.04	17.98

In the previous week, Calfrac Well Services had 3 more articles in the media than Wall Financial. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Calfrac Well Services and 3 mentions for Wall Financial. Wall Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Calfrac Well Services' score of -0.32 indicating that Wall Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Calfrac Well Services	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Wall Financial	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Calfrac Well Services currently has a consensus price target of C$7.75, suggesting a potential upside of 16.02%. Given Calfrac Well Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Calfrac Well Services is more favorable than Wall Financial.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Calfrac Well Services	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Wall Financial	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

25.0% of Calfrac Well Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Wall Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 46.9% of Calfrac Well Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 69.7% of Wall Financial shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Wall Financial has a net margin of 18.59% compared to Calfrac Well Services' net margin of 3.29%. Wall Financial's return on equity of 16.54% beat Calfrac Well Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Calfrac Well Services	3.29%	6.49%	6.32%
Wall Financial	18.59%	16.54%	4.20%

Summary

Calfrac Well Services and Wall Financial tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to Points.com?

Calfrac Well Services (TSE:CFW) and Points.com (TSE:PTS) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Calfrac Well Services has higher revenue and earnings than Points.com. Points.com is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Calfrac Well Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Calfrac Well Services	C$1.32B	0.51	C$27.97M	C$0.46	14.52
Points.com	C$432.40M	0.00	C$2.84M	C$0.19	N/A

In the previous week, Calfrac Well Services had 6 more articles in the media than Points.com. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Calfrac Well Services and 0 mentions for Points.com. Points.com's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Calfrac Well Services' score of -0.32 indicating that Points.com is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Calfrac Well Services	Neutral
Points.com	Neutral

Calfrac Well Services has a net margin of 3.29% compared to Points.com's net margin of 0.00%. Calfrac Well Services' return on equity of 6.49% beat Points.com's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Calfrac Well Services	3.29%	6.49%	6.32%
Points.com	N/A	N/A	N/A

25.0% of Calfrac Well Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 46.9% of Calfrac Well Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Calfrac Well Services currently has a consensus price target of C$7.75, suggesting a potential upside of 16.02%. Given Calfrac Well Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Calfrac Well Services is more favorable than Points.com.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Calfrac Well Services	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Points.com	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

Calfrac Well Services beats Points.com on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Calfrac Well Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CFW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CFW vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Calfrac Well Services	Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry	Energy Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$671.15M	C$543.60M	C$10.14B	C$12.19B
Dividend Yield	2.27%	19.58%	10.42%	6.19%
P/E Ratio	14.52	13.47	20.33	36.94
Price / Sales	0.51	122.93	764.38	10.45
Price / Cash	24.57	26.69	37.26	82.29
Price / Book	0.96	2.17	4.25	4.47
Net Income	C$27.97M	C$38.57M	C$4.24B	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	8.79%	0.38%	-1.06%	0.65%
1 Month Performance	14.97%	1.00%	-3.26%	-0.08%
1 Year Performance	90.86%	35.21%	37.42%	41.90%

Calfrac Well Services Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CFW Calfrac Well Services	3.1442 of 5 stars	C$6.68 flat	C$7.75 +16.0%	+90.9%	C$671.15M	C$1.32B	14.52	730	Insider Trade
HIVE HIVE Digital Technologies	N/A	C$4.10 flat	N/A	+58.3%	C$1.04B	C$257.14M	N/A	20	Gap Down
VBNK VersaBank	N/A	C$27.57 +9.9%	C$19.00 -31.1%	+89.3%	C$886.84M	C$133.33M	28.42	100	Gap Up High Trading Volume
WED Westaim	N/A	C$23.57 -0.8%	N/A	-28.5%	C$782.22M	C$84.96M	N/A	3,240
WFC Wall Financial	N/A	C$17.75 +0.1%	N/A	+21.4%	C$566.06M	C$179.24M	17.07	238,000	News Coverage Earnings Report

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:CFW) was last updated on 6/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Calfrac Well Services (CFW) Competitors

CFW vs. HIVE, VBNK, WED, WFC, and PTS

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to HIVE Digital Technologies?

Summary

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to VersaBank?

Summary

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to Westaim?

Summary

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to Wall Financial?

Summary

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to Points.com?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CFW vs. The Competition

Calfrac Well Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Calfrac Well Services (CFW) Competitors

CFW vs. HIVE, VBNK, WED, WFC, and PTS

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to HIVE Digital Technologies?

Does the media refer more to CFW or HIVE?

Is CFW or HIVE more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, CFW or HIVE?

Which has more risk and volatility, CFW or HIVE?

Do analysts rate CFW or HIVE?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of CFW or HIVE?

Summary

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to VersaBank?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in VBNK or CFW?

Which has more risk and volatility, VBNK or CFW?

Does the media favor VBNK or CFW?

Do analysts recommend VBNK or CFW?

Which has better valuation & earnings, VBNK or CFW?

Is VBNK or CFW more profitable?

Summary

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to Westaim?

Do analysts prefer WED or CFW?

Does the media prefer WED or CFW?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, WED or CFW?

Is WED or CFW more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in WED or CFW?

Which has more risk and volatility, WED or CFW?

Summary

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to Wall Financial?

Which has more risk and volatility, CFW or WFC?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, CFW or WFC?

Does the media refer more to CFW or WFC?

Do analysts recommend CFW or WFC?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in CFW or WFC?

Is CFW or WFC more profitable?

Summary

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to Points.com?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, CFW or PTS?

Does the media refer more to CFW or PTS?

Is CFW or PTS more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of CFW or PTS?

Do analysts recommend CFW or PTS?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CFW vs. The Competition

Calfrac Well Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools