Do analysts prefer HIVE or CFW?

Calfrac Well Services has a consensus price target of C$7.75, suggesting a potential upside of 21.86%. Given Calfrac Well Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Calfrac Well Services is more favorable than HIVE Digital Technologies. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score HIVE Digital Technologies 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Calfrac Well Services 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Do analysts rate CFW or VBNK?

Calfrac Well Services currently has a consensus target price of C$7.75, indicating a potential upside of 21.86%. Given Calfrac Well Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Calfrac Well Services is more favorable than VersaBank. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Calfrac Well Services 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 VersaBank 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Do analysts prefer WED or CFW?

Calfrac Well Services has a consensus target price of C$7.75, indicating a potential upside of 21.86%. Given Calfrac Well Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Calfrac Well Services is more favorable than Westaim. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Westaim 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Calfrac Well Services 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Do analysts prefer WFC or CFW?

Calfrac Well Services has a consensus target price of C$7.75, indicating a potential upside of 21.86%. Given Calfrac Well Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Calfrac Well Services is more favorable than Wall Financial. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Wall Financial 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Calfrac Well Services 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Do analysts rate PTS or CFW?

Calfrac Well Services has a consensus price target of C$7.75, suggesting a potential upside of 21.86%. Given Calfrac Well Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Calfrac Well Services is more favorable than Points.com. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Points.com 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Calfrac Well Services 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Calfrac Well Services (CFW) Competitors

$Calfrac Well Services logo$

C$6.36 -0.05 (-0.78%)

As of 07/24/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

CFW vs. HIVE, VBNK, WED, WFC, and PTS

Should you buy Calfrac Well Services stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Calfrac Well Services with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Calfrac Well Services include HIVE Digital Technologies (HIVE), VersaBank (VBNK), Westaim (WED), Wall Financial (WFC), and Points.com (PTS). These companies are all part of the "banking" industry.

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to HIVE Digital Technologies?

HIVE Digital Technologies (CVE:HIVE) and Calfrac Well Services (TSE:CFW) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and risk.

Calfrac Well Services has higher revenue and earnings than HIVE Digital Technologies. HIVE Digital Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Calfrac Well Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
HIVE Digital Technologies	C$257.14M	4.04	-C$13.38M	-C$0.77	N/A
Calfrac Well Services	C$1.32B	0.48	C$27.97M	C$0.46	13.83

HIVE Digital Technologies has a beta of 2.339164, suggesting that its stock price is 134% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Calfrac Well Services has a beta of -0.370789, suggesting that its stock price is 137% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Calfrac Well Services' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat HIVE Digital Technologies' score of 0.00 indicating that Calfrac Well Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
HIVE Digital Technologies	Neutral
Calfrac Well Services	Positive

Calfrac Well Services has a net margin of 3.29% compared to HIVE Digital Technologies' net margin of -50.32%. Calfrac Well Services' return on equity of 6.49% beat HIVE Digital Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
HIVE Digital Technologies	-50.32%	-26.37%	-8.78%
Calfrac Well Services	3.29%	6.49%	6.32%

Calfrac Well Services has a consensus price target of C$7.75, suggesting a potential upside of 21.86%. Given Calfrac Well Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Calfrac Well Services is more favorable than HIVE Digital Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
HIVE Digital Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Calfrac Well Services	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

15.2% of HIVE Digital Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.4% of Calfrac Well Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of HIVE Digital Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 46.9% of Calfrac Well Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Calfrac Well Services beats HIVE Digital Technologies on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to VersaBank?

Calfrac Well Services (TSE:CFW) and VersaBank (TSE:VBNK) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings and analyst recommendations.

VersaBank has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Calfrac Well Services. Calfrac Well Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than VersaBank, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Calfrac Well Services	C$1.32B	0.48	C$27.97M	C$0.46	13.83
VersaBank	C$141.48M	6.35	C$49.54M	C$0.94	29.67

26.4% of Calfrac Well Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.7% of VersaBank shares are owned by institutional investors. 46.9% of Calfrac Well Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 38.8% of VersaBank shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Calfrac Well Services currently has a consensus target price of C$7.75, indicating a potential upside of 21.86%. Given Calfrac Well Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Calfrac Well Services is more favorable than VersaBank.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Calfrac Well Services	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
VersaBank	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Calfrac Well Services has a beta of -0.370789, meaning that its share price is 137% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, VersaBank has a beta of 1.594838, meaning that its share price is 59% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Calfrac Well Services' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat VersaBank's score of 0.00 indicating that Calfrac Well Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Calfrac Well Services	Positive
VersaBank	Neutral

VersaBank has a net margin of 9.34% compared to Calfrac Well Services' net margin of 3.29%. Calfrac Well Services' return on equity of 6.49% beat VersaBank's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Calfrac Well Services	3.29%	6.49%	6.32%
VersaBank	9.34%	5.64%	1.10%

Summary

Calfrac Well Services beats VersaBank on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to Westaim?

Westaim (CVE:WED) and Calfrac Well Services (TSE:CFW) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Calfrac Well Services has higher revenue and earnings than Westaim. Westaim is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Calfrac Well Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Westaim	C$84.96M	8.77	C$4.52M	-C$1.91	N/A
Calfrac Well Services	C$1.32B	0.48	C$27.97M	C$0.46	13.83

Calfrac Well Services has a net margin of 3.29% compared to Westaim's net margin of -67.85%. Calfrac Well Services' return on equity of 6.49% beat Westaim's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Westaim	-67.85%	-9.69%	7.60%
Calfrac Well Services	3.29%	6.49%	6.32%

17.1% of Westaim shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.4% of Calfrac Well Services shares are held by institutional investors. 9.3% of Westaim shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 46.9% of Calfrac Well Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Calfrac Well Services has a consensus target price of C$7.75, indicating a potential upside of 21.86%. Given Calfrac Well Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Calfrac Well Services is more favorable than Westaim.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Westaim	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Calfrac Well Services	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Westaim has a beta of -0.175614, suggesting that its share price is 118% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Calfrac Well Services has a beta of -0.370789, suggesting that its share price is 137% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Calfrac Well Services' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Westaim's score of 0.00 indicating that Calfrac Well Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Westaim	Neutral
Calfrac Well Services	Positive

Summary

Calfrac Well Services beats Westaim on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to Wall Financial?

Wall Financial (TSE:WFC) and Calfrac Well Services (TSE:CFW) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Calfrac Well Services has higher revenue and earnings than Wall Financial. Calfrac Well Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wall Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Wall Financial	C$173.82M	3.49	C$24.83M	C$0.99	19.20
Calfrac Well Services	C$1.32B	0.48	C$27.97M	C$0.46	13.83

0.0% of Wall Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.4% of Calfrac Well Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 69.7% of Wall Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 46.9% of Calfrac Well Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Calfrac Well Services' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Wall Financial's score of 0.00 indicating that Calfrac Well Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Wall Financial	Neutral
Calfrac Well Services	Positive

Calfrac Well Services has a consensus target price of C$7.75, indicating a potential upside of 21.86%. Given Calfrac Well Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Calfrac Well Services is more favorable than Wall Financial.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Wall Financial	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Calfrac Well Services	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Wall Financial has a net margin of 18.34% compared to Calfrac Well Services' net margin of 3.29%. Wall Financial's return on equity of 15.90% beat Calfrac Well Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Wall Financial	18.34%	15.90%	4.20%
Calfrac Well Services	3.29%	6.49%	6.32%

Wall Financial has a beta of 1.053631, indicating that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Calfrac Well Services has a beta of -0.370789, indicating that its stock price is 137% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Wall Financial and Calfrac Well Services tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to Points.com?

Points.com (TSE:PTS) and Calfrac Well Services (TSE:CFW) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Points.com	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Calfrac Well Services	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, Calfrac Well Services' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Points.com's score of 0.00 indicating that Calfrac Well Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Points.com	Neutral
Calfrac Well Services	Positive

Calfrac Well Services has a net margin of 3.29% compared to Points.com's net margin of 0.00%. Calfrac Well Services' return on equity of 6.49% beat Points.com's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Points.com	N/A	N/A	N/A
Calfrac Well Services	3.29%	6.49%	6.32%

Calfrac Well Services has higher revenue and earnings than Points.com. Points.com is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Calfrac Well Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Points.com	C$432.40M	0.00	C$2.84M	C$0.19	N/A
Calfrac Well Services	C$1.32B	0.48	C$27.97M	C$0.46	13.83

26.4% of Calfrac Well Services shares are held by institutional investors. 46.9% of Calfrac Well Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Calfrac Well Services beats Points.com on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Calfrac Well Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CFW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CFW vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Calfrac Well Services	Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry	Energy Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$644.02M	C$542.98M	C$10.39B	C$12.48B
Dividend Yield	2.27%	19.59%	11.37%	6.19%
P/E Ratio	13.83	13.49	19.83	36.95
Price / Sales	0.48	113.81	388.85	9.44
Price / Cash	24.57	26.69	36.99	82.29
Price / Book	0.91	2.12	4.14	4.39
Net Income	C$27.97M	C$38.57M	C$4.25B	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	0.16%	0.59%	1.41%	0.61%
1 Month Performance	-3.20%	2.34%	3.01%	1.06%
1 Year Performance	61.01%	27.30%	29.33%	30.89%

Calfrac Well Services Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CFW Calfrac Well Services	3.7823 of 5 stars	C$6.36 -0.8%	C$7.75 +21.9%	+75.7%	C$644.02M	C$1.32B	13.83	730
HIVE HIVE Digital Technologies	N/A	C$4.10 flat	N/A	+28.1%	C$1.04B	C$257.14M	N/A	20	Gap Down
VBNK VersaBank	N/A	C$30.03 +0.9%	N/A	+76.5%	C$966.85M	C$141.48M	31.95	100
WED Westaim	N/A	C$22.27 +0.7%	N/A	-23.8%	C$739.07M	C$84.96M	N/A	3,240
WFC Wall Financial	N/A	C$18.20 flat	N/A	+13.8%	C$580.42M	C$173.82M	18.38	238,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:CFW) was last updated on 7/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Calfrac Well Services (CFW) Competitors

CFW vs. HIVE, VBNK, WED, WFC, and PTS

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to HIVE Digital Technologies?

Summary

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to VersaBank?

Summary

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to Westaim?

Summary

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to Wall Financial?

Summary

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to Points.com?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CFW vs. The Competition

Calfrac Well Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Calfrac Well Services (CFW) Competitors

CFW vs. HIVE, VBNK, WED, WFC, and PTS

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to HIVE Digital Technologies?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, HIVE or CFW?

Which has more risk & volatility, HIVE or CFW?

Does the media prefer HIVE or CFW?

Is HIVE or CFW more profitable?

Do analysts prefer HIVE or CFW?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in HIVE or CFW?

Summary

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to VersaBank?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, CFW or VBNK?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in CFW or VBNK?

Do analysts rate CFW or VBNK?

Which has more volatility & risk, CFW or VBNK?

Does the media favor CFW or VBNK?

Is CFW or VBNK more profitable?

Summary

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to Westaim?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, WED or CFW?

Is WED or CFW more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in WED or CFW?

Do analysts prefer WED or CFW?

Which has more risk & volatility, WED or CFW?

Does the media refer more to WED or CFW?

Summary

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to Wall Financial?

Which has better earnings and valuation, WFC or CFW?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in WFC or CFW?

Does the media favor WFC or CFW?

Do analysts prefer WFC or CFW?

Is WFC or CFW more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, WFC or CFW?

Summary

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to Points.com?

Do analysts rate PTS or CFW?

Does the media favor PTS or CFW?

Is PTS or CFW more profitable?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, PTS or CFW?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in PTS or CFW?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CFW vs. The Competition

Calfrac Well Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools