Calfrac Well Services (CFW) Competitors

$Calfrac Well Services logo$

C$5.66 -0.37 (-6.14%)

As of 04:00 PM Eastern

CFW vs. HIVE, WED, VBNK, WFC, and PTS

Should you buy Calfrac Well Services stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Calfrac Well Services with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Calfrac Well Services include HIVE Digital Technologies (HIVE), Westaim (WED), VersaBank (VBNK), Wall Financial (WFC), and Points.com (PTS). These companies are all part of the "banking" industry.

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to HIVE Digital Technologies?

HIVE Digital Technologies (CVE:HIVE) and Calfrac Well Services (TSE:CFW) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Calfrac Well Services has higher revenue and earnings than HIVE Digital Technologies. HIVE Digital Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Calfrac Well Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
HIVE Digital Technologies	C$257.14M	4.04	-C$13.38M	-C$0.77	N/A
Calfrac Well Services	C$1.32B	0.43	C$27.97M	C$0.46	12.30

15.2% of HIVE Digital Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.7% of Calfrac Well Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of HIVE Digital Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 46.9% of Calfrac Well Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Calfrac Well Services has a consensus price target of C$7.75, suggesting a potential upside of 36.93%. Given Calfrac Well Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Calfrac Well Services is more favorable than HIVE Digital Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
HIVE Digital Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Calfrac Well Services	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Calfrac Well Services has a net margin of 3.29% compared to HIVE Digital Technologies' net margin of -28.29%. Calfrac Well Services' return on equity of 6.49% beat HIVE Digital Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
HIVE Digital Technologies	-28.29%	-13.39%	-8.78%
Calfrac Well Services	3.29%	6.49%	6.32%

In the previous week, Calfrac Well Services had 3 more articles in the media than HIVE Digital Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Calfrac Well Services and 3 mentions for HIVE Digital Technologies. HIVE Digital Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Calfrac Well Services' score of 0.63 indicating that HIVE Digital Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
HIVE Digital Technologies	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Calfrac Well Services	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

HIVE Digital Technologies has a beta of 2.339164, indicating that its share price is 134% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Calfrac Well Services has a beta of -0.208781, indicating that its share price is 121% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Calfrac Well Services beats HIVE Digital Technologies on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to Westaim?

Westaim (CVE:WED) and Calfrac Well Services (TSE:CFW) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

Calfrac Well Services has a net margin of 3.29% compared to Westaim's net margin of -67.85%. Calfrac Well Services' return on equity of 6.49% beat Westaim's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Westaim	-67.85%	-9.69%	7.60%
Calfrac Well Services	3.29%	6.49%	6.32%

16.4% of Westaim shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.7% of Calfrac Well Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.3% of Westaim shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 46.9% of Calfrac Well Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Calfrac Well Services had 5 more articles in the media than Westaim. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Calfrac Well Services and 1 mentions for Westaim. Calfrac Well Services' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Westaim's score of 0.45 indicating that Calfrac Well Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Westaim	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Calfrac Well Services	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Westaim has a beta of -0.341351, suggesting that its share price is 134% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Calfrac Well Services has a beta of -0.208781, suggesting that its share price is 121% less volatile than the broader market.

Calfrac Well Services has higher revenue and earnings than Westaim. Westaim is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Calfrac Well Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Westaim	C$84.96M	9.29	C$4.52M	-C$1.91	N/A
Calfrac Well Services	C$1.32B	0.43	C$27.97M	C$0.46	12.30

Calfrac Well Services has a consensus target price of C$7.75, indicating a potential upside of 36.93%. Given Calfrac Well Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Calfrac Well Services is more favorable than Westaim.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Westaim	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Calfrac Well Services	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Summary

Calfrac Well Services beats Westaim on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to VersaBank?

VersaBank (TSE:VBNK) and Calfrac Well Services (TSE:CFW) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Calfrac Well Services had 6 more articles in the media than VersaBank. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Calfrac Well Services and 0 mentions for VersaBank. Calfrac Well Services' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat VersaBank's score of 0.00 indicating that Calfrac Well Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
VersaBank	Neutral
Calfrac Well Services	Positive

10.1% of VersaBank shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.7% of Calfrac Well Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 38.8% of VersaBank shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 46.9% of Calfrac Well Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

VersaBank has a beta of 1.591982, indicating that its stock price is 59% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Calfrac Well Services has a beta of -0.208781, indicating that its stock price is 121% less volatile than the broader market.

VersaBank has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Calfrac Well Services. Calfrac Well Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than VersaBank, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
VersaBank	C$133.33M	5.98	C$49.54M	C$0.97	25.56
Calfrac Well Services	C$1.32B	0.43	C$27.97M	C$0.46	12.30

VersaBank presently has a consensus price target of C$19.00, indicating a potential downside of 23.36%. Calfrac Well Services has a consensus price target of C$7.75, indicating a potential upside of 36.93%. Given Calfrac Well Services' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Calfrac Well Services is more favorable than VersaBank.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
VersaBank	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Calfrac Well Services	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

VersaBank has a net margin of 10.04% compared to Calfrac Well Services' net margin of 3.29%. Calfrac Well Services' return on equity of 6.49% beat VersaBank's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
VersaBank	10.04%	5.89%	1.10%
Calfrac Well Services	3.29%	6.49%	6.32%

Summary

Calfrac Well Services beats VersaBank on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to Wall Financial?

Wall Financial (TSE:WFC) and Calfrac Well Services (TSE:CFW) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and valuation.

In the previous week, Calfrac Well Services had 6 more articles in the media than Wall Financial. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Calfrac Well Services and 0 mentions for Wall Financial. Calfrac Well Services' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Wall Financial's score of 0.00 indicating that Calfrac Well Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Wall Financial	Neutral
Calfrac Well Services	Positive

Wall Financial has a beta of 0.766237, indicating that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Calfrac Well Services has a beta of -0.208781, indicating that its stock price is 121% less volatile than the broader market.

Calfrac Well Services has higher revenue and earnings than Wall Financial. Calfrac Well Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wall Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Wall Financial	C$179.24M	3.20	C$24.83M	C$1.04	17.27
Calfrac Well Services	C$1.32B	0.43	C$27.97M	C$0.46	12.30

0.0% of Wall Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.7% of Calfrac Well Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 69.7% of Wall Financial shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 46.9% of Calfrac Well Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Calfrac Well Services has a consensus price target of C$7.75, indicating a potential upside of 36.93%. Given Calfrac Well Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Calfrac Well Services is more favorable than Wall Financial.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Wall Financial	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Calfrac Well Services	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Wall Financial has a net margin of 18.59% compared to Calfrac Well Services' net margin of 3.29%. Wall Financial's return on equity of 16.54% beat Calfrac Well Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Wall Financial	18.59%	16.54%	4.20%
Calfrac Well Services	3.29%	6.49%	6.32%

Summary

Calfrac Well Services beats Wall Financial on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to Points.com?

Points.com (TSE:PTS) and Calfrac Well Services (TSE:CFW) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Calfrac Well Services has a net margin of 3.29% compared to Points.com's net margin of 0.00%. Calfrac Well Services' return on equity of 6.49% beat Points.com's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Points.com	N/A	N/A	N/A
Calfrac Well Services	3.29%	6.49%	6.32%

In the previous week, Calfrac Well Services had 6 more articles in the media than Points.com. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Calfrac Well Services and 0 mentions for Points.com. Calfrac Well Services' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Points.com's score of 0.00 indicating that Calfrac Well Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Points.com	Neutral
Calfrac Well Services	Positive

Calfrac Well Services has a consensus price target of C$7.75, indicating a potential upside of 36.93%. Given Calfrac Well Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Calfrac Well Services is more favorable than Points.com.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Points.com	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Calfrac Well Services	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Calfrac Well Services has higher revenue and earnings than Points.com. Points.com is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Calfrac Well Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Points.com	C$432.40M	0.00	C$2.84M	C$0.19	N/A
Calfrac Well Services	C$1.32B	0.43	C$27.97M	C$0.46	12.30

16.7% of Calfrac Well Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 46.9% of Calfrac Well Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Calfrac Well Services beats Points.com on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Calfrac Well Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CFW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CFW vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Calfrac Well Services	Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry	Energy Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$568.37M	C$583.77M	C$10.57B	C$12.44B
Dividend Yield	2.27%	20.02%	10.23%	6.20%
P/E Ratio	12.30	15.03	21.11	37.64
Price / Sales	0.43	322.60	1,003.92	11.68
Price / Cash	24.57	26.69	38.74	82.29
Price / Book	0.81	2.26	4.66	4.50
Net Income	C$27.97M	C$38.57M	C$4.24B	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-2.58%	-0.52%	-0.26%	1.38%
1 Month Performance	-0.53%	0.62%	2.28%	1.46%
1 Year Performance	77.99%	48.62%	54.41%	55.45%

Calfrac Well Services Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CFW Calfrac Well Services	4.0606 of 5 stars	C$5.66 -6.1%	C$7.75 +36.9%	+89.6%	C$568.37M	C$1.32B	12.30	730	Positive News Gap Up
HIVE HIVE Digital Technologies	N/A	C$4.10 flat	N/A	+51.3%	C$1.04B	C$257.14M	N/A	20	Gap Down
WED Westaim	N/A	C$23.50 flat	N/A	-24.7%	C$781.56M	C$84.96M	N/A	3,240
VBNK VersaBank	0.6533 of 5 stars	C$24.12 +0.9%	C$19.00 -21.2%	+52.5%	C$768.80M	C$133.33M	24.87	100
WFC Wall Financial	N/A	C$16.88 -0.1%	N/A	N/A	C$539.13M	C$179.24M	16.23	238,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:CFW) was last updated on 5/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Calfrac Well Services (CFW) Competitors

CFW vs. HIVE, WED, VBNK, WFC, and PTS

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to HIVE Digital Technologies?

Summary

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to Westaim?

Summary

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to VersaBank?

Summary

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to Wall Financial?

Summary

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to Points.com?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CFW vs. The Competition

Calfrac Well Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Calfrac Well Services (CFW) Competitors

CFW vs. HIVE, WED, VBNK, WFC, and PTS

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to HIVE Digital Technologies?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, HIVE or CFW?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of HIVE or CFW?

Do analysts prefer HIVE or CFW?

Is HIVE or CFW more profitable?

Does the media prefer HIVE or CFW?

Which has more volatility & risk, HIVE or CFW?

Summary

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to Westaim?

Is WED or CFW more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in WED or CFW?

Does the media refer more to WED or CFW?

Which has more risk and volatility, WED or CFW?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, WED or CFW?

Do analysts recommend WED or CFW?

Summary

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to VersaBank?

Does the media refer more to VBNK or CFW?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in VBNK or CFW?

Which has more risk and volatility, VBNK or CFW?

Which has better valuation & earnings, VBNK or CFW?

Do analysts rate VBNK or CFW?

Is VBNK or CFW more profitable?

Summary

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to Wall Financial?

Does the media prefer WFC or CFW?

Which has more risk & volatility, WFC or CFW?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, WFC or CFW?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in WFC or CFW?

Do analysts rate WFC or CFW?

Is WFC or CFW more profitable?

Summary

How does Calfrac Well Services compare to Points.com?

Is PTS or CFW more profitable?

Does the media favor PTS or CFW?

Do analysts prefer PTS or CFW?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, PTS or CFW?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in PTS or CFW?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CFW vs. The Competition

Calfrac Well Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools