Pulse Seismic (PSD) Competitors

C$3.32 -0.08 (-2.35%)

As of 05/25/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

PSD vs. NOA, CFW, STEP, SHLE, and SDY

Should you buy Pulse Seismic stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Pulse Seismic with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Pulse Seismic include North American Construction Group (NOA), Calfrac Well Services (CFW), STEP Energy Services (STEP), Source Energy Services (SHLE), and Strad Inc. (SDY.TO) (SDY). These companies are all part of the "oil & gas equipment & services" industry.

How does Pulse Seismic compare to North American Construction Group?

Pulse Seismic (TSE:PSD) and North American Construction Group (TSE:NOA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings and media sentiment.

19.7% of Pulse Seismic shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.0% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. 23.0% of Pulse Seismic shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.9% of North American Construction Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, North American Construction Group had 5 more articles in the media than Pulse Seismic. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for North American Construction Group and 0 mentions for Pulse Seismic. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Pulse Seismic's score of 0.00 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Pulse Seismic	Neutral
North American Construction Group	Positive

Pulse Seismic pays an annual dividend of C$0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. North American Construction Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Pulse Seismic pays out 41.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. North American Construction Group pays out 42.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Pulse Seismic has a beta of 0.376723, suggesting that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, North American Construction Group has a beta of 0.861491, suggesting that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Pulse Seismic. North American Construction Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pulse Seismic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pulse Seismic	C$30.18M	5.58	C$10.87M	C$0.17	19.53
North American Construction Group	C$1.26B	0.44	C$56.80M	C$1.12	18.10

Pulse Seismic has a net margin of 27.77% compared to North American Construction Group's net margin of 2.63%. Pulse Seismic's return on equity of 45.85% beat North American Construction Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pulse Seismic	27.77%	45.85%	32.06%
North American Construction Group	2.63%	7.69%	6.65%

North American Construction Group has a consensus target price of C$22.71, suggesting a potential upside of 12.06%. Given North American Construction Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Pulse Seismic.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pulse Seismic	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
North American Construction Group	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Pulse Seismic on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pulse Seismic compare to Calfrac Well Services?

Calfrac Well Services (TSE:CFW) and Pulse Seismic (TSE:PSD) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Calfrac Well Services had 6 more articles in the media than Pulse Seismic. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Calfrac Well Services and 0 mentions for Pulse Seismic. Calfrac Well Services' average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Pulse Seismic's score of 0.00 indicating that Calfrac Well Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Calfrac Well Services	Positive
Pulse Seismic	Neutral

Calfrac Well Services has higher revenue and earnings than Pulse Seismic. Calfrac Well Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pulse Seismic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Calfrac Well Services	C$1.32B	0.43	C$27.97M	C$0.46	12.30
Pulse Seismic	C$30.18M	5.58	C$10.87M	C$0.17	19.53

Calfrac Well Services has a beta of -0.208781, indicating that its share price is 121% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pulse Seismic has a beta of 0.376723, indicating that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

16.7% of Calfrac Well Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.7% of Pulse Seismic shares are owned by institutional investors. 46.9% of Calfrac Well Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.0% of Pulse Seismic shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Calfrac Well Services presently has a consensus target price of C$7.75, suggesting a potential upside of 36.93%. Given Calfrac Well Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Calfrac Well Services is more favorable than Pulse Seismic.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Calfrac Well Services	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Pulse Seismic	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Pulse Seismic has a net margin of 27.77% compared to Calfrac Well Services' net margin of 3.29%. Pulse Seismic's return on equity of 45.85% beat Calfrac Well Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Calfrac Well Services	3.29%	6.49%	6.32%
Pulse Seismic	27.77%	45.85%	32.06%

Summary

Calfrac Well Services beats Pulse Seismic on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pulse Seismic compare to STEP Energy Services?

STEP Energy Services (TSE:STEP) and Pulse Seismic (TSE:PSD) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

STEP Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Pulse Seismic. STEP Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pulse Seismic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
STEP Energy Services	C$910.44M	0.44	C$41.05M	-C$0.11	N/A
Pulse Seismic	C$30.18M	5.58	C$10.87M	C$0.17	19.53

Pulse Seismic has a net margin of 27.77% compared to STEP Energy Services' net margin of -0.86%. Pulse Seismic's return on equity of 45.85% beat STEP Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
STEP Energy Services	-0.86%	-2.01%	9.15%
Pulse Seismic	27.77%	45.85%	32.06%

1.9% of STEP Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.7% of Pulse Seismic shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of STEP Energy Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.0% of Pulse Seismic shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

STEP Energy Services has a beta of 1.595161, suggesting that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pulse Seismic has a beta of 0.376723, suggesting that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

STEP Energy Services presently has a consensus price target of C$4.50, indicating a potential downside of 18.03%. Given STEP Energy Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe STEP Energy Services is more favorable than Pulse Seismic.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
STEP Energy Services	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Pulse Seismic	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, STEP Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pulse Seismic'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
STEP Energy Services	Neutral
Pulse Seismic	Neutral

Summary

Pulse Seismic beats STEP Energy Services on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pulse Seismic compare to Source Energy Services?

Source Energy Services (TSE:SHLE) and Pulse Seismic (TSE:PSD) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Source Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pulse Seismic'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Source Energy Services	Neutral
Pulse Seismic	Neutral

Source Energy Services has a beta of 0.915654, meaning that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pulse Seismic has a beta of 0.376723, meaning that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

Source Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Pulse Seismic. Pulse Seismic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Source Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Source Energy Services	C$651.96M	0.30	C$169.48M	C$0.49	30.10
Pulse Seismic	C$30.18M	5.58	C$10.87M	C$0.17	19.53

Pulse Seismic has a net margin of 27.77% compared to Source Energy Services' net margin of 0.95%. Pulse Seismic's return on equity of 45.85% beat Source Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Source Energy Services	0.95%	2.93%	6.78%
Pulse Seismic	27.77%	45.85%	32.06%

1.3% of Source Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.7% of Pulse Seismic shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.1% of Source Energy Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.0% of Pulse Seismic shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Pulse Seismic beats Source Energy Services on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pulse Seismic compare to Strad Inc. (SDY.TO)?

Strad Inc. (SDY.TO) (TSE:SDY) and Pulse Seismic (TSE:PSD) are both small-cap oil & gas equipment & services industry companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, dividends, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Strad Inc. (SDY.TO)'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pulse Seismic'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Strad Inc. (SDY.TO)	Neutral
Pulse Seismic	Neutral

Pulse Seismic has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Strad Inc. (SDY.TO). Strad Inc. (SDY.TO) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pulse Seismic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Strad Inc. (SDY.TO)	C$130.24M	0.00	C$1.03M	C$0.02	N/A
Pulse Seismic	C$30.18M	5.58	C$10.87M	C$0.17	19.53

19.7% of Pulse Seismic shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.0% of Pulse Seismic shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pulse Seismic has a net margin of 27.77% compared to Strad Inc. (SDY.TO)'s net margin of 0.00%. Pulse Seismic's return on equity of 45.85% beat Strad Inc. (SDY.TO)'s return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Strad Inc. (SDY.TO)	N/A	N/A	N/A
Pulse Seismic	27.77%	45.85%	32.06%

Summary

Pulse Seismic beats Strad Inc. (SDY.TO) on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pulse Seismic News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PSD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PSD vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Pulse Seismic	Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry	Energy Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$168.37M	C$583.77M	C$10.59B	C$12.16B
Dividend Yield	2.10%	20.02%	10.23%	6.20%
P/E Ratio	19.53	15.03	21.11	37.64
Price / Sales	5.58	322.60	1,036.93	11.68
Price / Cash	16.57	26.69	38.74	82.29
Price / Book	16.85	2.26	4.66	4.50
Net Income	C$10.87M	C$38.57M	C$4.24B	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-3.49%	-0.65%	-0.43%	2.48%
1 Month Performance	-20.95%	0.56%	2.28%	1.47%
1 Year Performance	27.69%	47.99%	54.02%	53.55%

Pulse Seismic Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PSD Pulse Seismic	N/A	C$3.32 -2.4%	N/A	+27.2%	C$168.37M	C$30.18M	19.53	15	Gap Down
NOA North American Construction Group	4.6303 of 5 stars	C$21.62 +9.2%	C$22.71 +5.1%	-14.0%	C$614.33M	C$1.28B	18.96	200	Positive News High Trading Volume
CFW Calfrac Well Services	4.0463 of 5 stars	C$5.79 +2.7%	C$7.75 +33.9%	+78.0%	C$581.22M	C$1.39B	17.03	730	News Coverage Positive News
STEP STEP Energy Services	0.0767 of 5 stars	C$5.49 -0.2%	C$4.50 -18.0%	+36.2%	C$400.15M	C$910.44M	N/A	1,432
SHLE Source Energy Services	N/A	C$14.82 +0.5%	N/A	+30.0%	C$193.85M	C$651.96M	30.24	451	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:PSD) was last updated on 5/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Pulse Seismic (PSD) Competitors

PSD vs. NOA, CFW, STEP, SHLE, and SDY

How does Pulse Seismic compare to North American Construction Group?

Summary

How does Pulse Seismic compare to Calfrac Well Services?

Summary

How does Pulse Seismic compare to STEP Energy Services?

Summary

How does Pulse Seismic compare to Source Energy Services?

Summary

How does Pulse Seismic compare to Strad Inc. (SDY.TO)?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PSD vs. The Competition

Pulse Seismic Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Pulse Seismic (PSD) Competitors

PSD vs. NOA, CFW, STEP, SHLE, and SDY

How does Pulse Seismic compare to North American Construction Group?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in PSD or NOA?

Does the media refer more to PSD or NOA?

Is PSD or NOA a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, PSD or NOA?

Which has better valuation & earnings, PSD or NOA?

Is PSD or NOA more profitable?

Do analysts rate PSD or NOA?

Summary

How does Pulse Seismic compare to Calfrac Well Services?

Does the media prefer CFW or PSD?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, CFW or PSD?

Which has more risk and volatility, CFW or PSD?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in CFW or PSD?

Do analysts prefer CFW or PSD?

Is CFW or PSD more profitable?

Summary

How does Pulse Seismic compare to STEP Energy Services?

Which has better earnings and valuation, STEP or PSD?

Is STEP or PSD more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in STEP or PSD?

Which has more risk & volatility, STEP or PSD?

Do analysts recommend STEP or PSD?

Does the media refer more to STEP or PSD?

Summary

How does Pulse Seismic compare to Source Energy Services?

Does the media refer more to SHLE or PSD?

Which has more risk & volatility, SHLE or PSD?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, SHLE or PSD?

Is SHLE or PSD more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in SHLE or PSD?

Summary

How does Pulse Seismic compare to Strad Inc. (SDY.TO)?

Does the media prefer SDY or PSD?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, SDY or PSD?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of SDY or PSD?

Is SDY or PSD more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PSD vs. The Competition

Pulse Seismic Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools