Go Pro
→ How Long Does $2.5M Last in Retirement? (From SmartAsset) (Ad)tc pixel Free PSD Stock Alerts

Pulse Seismic (PSD) Competitors

Pulse Seismic logo
C$2.99 -0.01 (-0.33%)
As of 09/3/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Compare

PSD vs. PHX, FRC, STEP, ACX, and SHLE

Should you buy Pulse Seismic stock or one of its competitors? Pulse Seismic's main competitors and comparable companies include PHX Energy Services (PHX), Canyon Services Group (FRC), STEP Energy Services (STEP), ACT Energy Technologies (ACX), and Source Energy Services (SHLE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas equipment & services" industry.

How does Pulse Seismic compare to PHX Energy Services?

Pulse Seismic (TSE:PSD) and PHX Energy Services (TSE:PHX) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, dividends and valuation.

PHX Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Pulse Seismic. PHX Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pulse Seismic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pulse SeismicC$15.47M9.80C$10.87MC$0.01299.00
PHX Energy ServicesC$711.02M0.82C$72.75MC$0.9513.40

In the previous week, PHX Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Pulse Seismic's score of 0.00 indicating that PHX Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pulse Seismic Neutral
PHX Energy Services Positive

Pulse Seismic pays an annual dividend of C$0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. PHX Energy Services pays an annual dividend of C$0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Pulse Seismic pays out 712.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PHX Energy Services pays out 84.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PHX Energy Services is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

PHX Energy Services has a net margin of 6.46% compared to Pulse Seismic's net margin of 2.42%. PHX Energy Services' return on equity of 20.25% beat Pulse Seismic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pulse Seismic2.42% 2.74% 32.06%
PHX Energy Services 6.46%20.25%10.65%

PHX Energy Services has a consensus target price of C$11.13, suggesting a potential downside of 12.61%. Given PHX Energy Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe PHX Energy Services is more favorable than Pulse Seismic.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pulse Seismic
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
PHX Energy Services
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

19.7% of Pulse Seismic shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.8% of PHX Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.0% of Pulse Seismic shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.9% of PHX Energy Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pulse Seismic has a beta of 0.197835, suggesting that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PHX Energy Services has a beta of 1.067289, suggesting that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

PHX Energy Services beats Pulse Seismic on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pulse Seismic compare to Canyon Services Group?

Canyon Services Group (TSE:FRC) and Pulse Seismic (TSE:PSD) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

Pulse Seismic has higher revenue and earnings than Canyon Services Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Canyon Services GroupN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Pulse SeismicC$15.47M9.80C$10.87MC$0.01299.00

Pulse Seismic has a net margin of 2.42% compared to Canyon Services Group's net margin of 0.00%. Pulse Seismic's return on equity of 2.74% beat Canyon Services Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Canyon Services GroupN/A N/A N/A
Pulse Seismic 2.42%2.74%32.06%

19.7% of Pulse Seismic shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.0% of Pulse Seismic shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Canyon Services Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pulse Seismic'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Canyon Services Group Neutral
Pulse Seismic Neutral

Summary

Pulse Seismic beats Canyon Services Group on 6 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pulse Seismic compare to STEP Energy Services?

Pulse Seismic (TSE:PSD) and STEP Energy Services (TSE:STEP) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation and profitability.

STEP Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Pulse Seismic. STEP Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pulse Seismic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pulse SeismicC$15.47M9.80C$10.87MC$0.01299.00
STEP Energy ServicesC$910.44M0.44C$41.05M-C$0.11N/A

In the previous week, STEP Energy Services had 1 more articles in the media than Pulse Seismic. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for STEP Energy Services and 0 mentions for Pulse Seismic. STEP Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Pulse Seismic's score of 0.00 indicating that STEP Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pulse Seismic Neutral
STEP Energy Services Positive

STEP Energy Services has a net margin of 4.82% compared to Pulse Seismic's net margin of 2.42%. STEP Energy Services' return on equity of 9.31% beat Pulse Seismic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pulse Seismic2.42% 2.74% 32.06%
STEP Energy Services 4.82%9.31%9.15%

Pulse Seismic has a beta of 0.197835, indicating that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, STEP Energy Services has a beta of 1.595161, indicating that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

19.7% of Pulse Seismic shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.9% of STEP Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. 23.0% of Pulse Seismic shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of STEP Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

STEP Energy Services beats Pulse Seismic on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pulse Seismic compare to ACT Energy Technologies?

Pulse Seismic (TSE:PSD) and ACT Energy Technologies (TSE:ACX) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

ACT Energy Technologies has a consensus price target of C$9.67, indicating a potential upside of 23.77%. Given ACT Energy Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ACT Energy Technologies is more favorable than Pulse Seismic.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pulse Seismic
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
ACT Energy Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

19.7% of Pulse Seismic shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.2% of ACT Energy Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.0% of Pulse Seismic shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pulse Seismic has a beta of 0.197835, indicating that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ACT Energy Technologies has a beta of 0.087601, indicating that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, ACT Energy Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than Pulse Seismic. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for ACT Energy Technologies and 0 mentions for Pulse Seismic. ACT Energy Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Pulse Seismic's score of 0.00 indicating that ACT Energy Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pulse Seismic Neutral
ACT Energy Technologies Positive

ACT Energy Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Pulse Seismic. ACT Energy Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pulse Seismic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pulse SeismicC$15.47M9.80C$10.87MC$0.01299.00
ACT Energy TechnologiesC$550.50M0.55C$27.04MC$0.7011.16

Pulse Seismic has a net margin of 2.42% compared to ACT Energy Technologies' net margin of 0.00%. Pulse Seismic's return on equity of 2.74% beat ACT Energy Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pulse Seismic2.42% 2.74% 32.06%
ACT Energy Technologies N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Pulse Seismic and ACT Energy Technologies tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pulse Seismic compare to Source Energy Services?

Pulse Seismic (TSE:PSD) and Source Energy Services (TSE:SHLE) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Source Energy Services had 1 more articles in the media than Pulse Seismic. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Source Energy Services and 0 mentions for Pulse Seismic. Source Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Pulse Seismic's score of 0.00 indicating that Source Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pulse Seismic Neutral
Source Energy Services Positive

Source Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Pulse Seismic. Source Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pulse Seismic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pulse SeismicC$15.47M9.80C$10.87MC$0.01299.00
Source Energy ServicesC$587.19M0.26C$169.48M-C$0.95N/A

19.7% of Pulse Seismic shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.2% of Source Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. 23.0% of Pulse Seismic shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.1% of Source Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Pulse Seismic has a net margin of 2.42% compared to Source Energy Services' net margin of -2.21%. Pulse Seismic's return on equity of 2.74% beat Source Energy Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pulse Seismic2.42% 2.74% 32.06%
Source Energy Services -2.21%-6.25%6.78%

Pulse Seismic has a beta of 0.197835, indicating that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Source Energy Services has a beta of 1.089884, indicating that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pulse Seismic beats Source Energy Services on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pulse Seismic News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PSD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PSD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PSD vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPulse SeismicEnergy Equipment & Services IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$152.14MC$3.90BC$10.17BC$12.57B
Dividend Yield2.42%13.34%11.47%6.25%
P/E Ratio299.0045.2722.0439.47
Price / Sales9.8032.20511.279.82
Price / Cash16.5721.2436.2682.29
Price / Book14.302.253.124.71
Net IncomeC$10.87MC$67.81MC$4.33BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-0.33%1.44%1.50%-0.31%
1 Month Performance-5.68%4.49%6.63%3.12%
1 Year Performance-21.32%46.70%38.57%28.73%

Pulse Seismic Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PSD
Pulse Seismic
N/AC$2.99
-0.3%		N/A-22.3%C$152.14MC$15.47M299.0015
PHX
PHX Energy Services
1.6251 of 5 stars		C$12.72
+2.0%		C$11.13
-12.5%		+67.1%C$582.12MC$711.02M13.3920
FRC
Canyon Services Group
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$575.60MN/AN/A147,000
STEP
STEP Energy Services
N/AC$5.49
-0.2%		N/A+25.9%C$400.15MC$910.44MN/A1,432
ACX
ACT Energy Technologies
2.2977 of 5 stars		C$7.30
+4.4%		C$9.67
+32.4%		+56.5%C$282.04MC$550.50M10.43N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:PSD) was last updated on 9/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The 2026 beginners Guide to Gold IRAs
Gold trades near record highs while silver just topped $81 an ounce for the first time ever. Thousands of A...
Goldco Direct, LLC | Sponsoredtc pixel
A Simple Guide to Options Trading While It's Still Free
A free copy of Options Trading Made Simple is available now but wont stay that way for long. Chris Rowe cal...
True Market Insiders | Sponsoredtc pixel
Are you leaving Social Security money on the table?
Most retirement plans still have gaps in them... The quiet ones that don't show up until it's too late to fix....
Money Pickle | Sponsoredtc pixel
How Long Does $2.5M Last in Retirement?
Having $2.5 million saved puts you ahead of most Americans, but how long it lasts depends on the decisions you...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel
Before Anthropic becomes impossible to ignore...
Riot Platforms just struck a 20-year, 191-megawatt data-center agreement tied to Anthropic, reportedly worth 9...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Rickards Predicts: Trump to buy tiny $2 stock?
Jim Rickards believes the Trump administration is about to take a direct stake in a $2 stock sitting on the la...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Major Buy Alert Issued for September 30th
Keith Kaplan has invested $17 million into his own AI research tools, building a platform now used by 180,000 ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel