Do analysts prefer PSD or CFW?

Calfrac Well Services has a consensus target price of C$7.75, suggesting a potential upside of 21.86%. Given Calfrac Well Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Calfrac Well Services is more favorable than Pulse Seismic. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Pulse Seismic 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Calfrac Well Services 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has better earnings & valuation, PSD or STEP?

STEP Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Pulse Seismic. STEP Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pulse Seismic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Pulse Seismic C$30.18M 5.36 C$10.87M C$0.17 18.76 STEP Energy Services C$910.44M 0.44 C$41.05M -C$0.11 N/A

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, PSD or SHLE?

Source Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Pulse Seismic. Pulse Seismic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Source Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Pulse Seismic C$30.18M 5.36 C$10.87M C$0.17 18.76 Source Energy Services C$651.96M 0.25 C$169.48M C$0.49 25.67

Do analysts recommend E or PSD?

Enterprise Group presently has a consensus price target of C$1.80, suggesting a potential upside of 7.78%. Given Enterprise Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Enterprise Group is more favorable than Pulse Seismic. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Enterprise Group 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Pulse Seismic 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Pulse Seismic (PSD) Competitors

C$3.19 -0.08 (-2.45%)

As of 07/24/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

PSD vs. CFW, NOA, STEP, SHLE, and E

Should you buy Pulse Seismic stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Pulse Seismic with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Pulse Seismic include Calfrac Well Services (CFW), North American Construction Group (NOA), STEP Energy Services (STEP), Source Energy Services (SHLE), and Enterprise Group (E). These companies are all part of the "oil & gas equipment & services" industry.

How does Pulse Seismic compare to Calfrac Well Services?

Pulse Seismic (TSE:PSD) and Calfrac Well Services (TSE:CFW) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, risk, valuation and dividends.

Calfrac Well Services has higher revenue and earnings than Pulse Seismic. Calfrac Well Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pulse Seismic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pulse Seismic	C$30.18M	5.36	C$10.87M	C$0.17	18.76
Calfrac Well Services	C$1.32B	0.48	C$27.97M	C$0.46	13.83

In the previous week, Calfrac Well Services' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Pulse Seismic's score of 0.00 indicating that Calfrac Well Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Pulse Seismic	Neutral
Calfrac Well Services	Positive

19.7% of Pulse Seismic shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.4% of Calfrac Well Services shares are held by institutional investors. 23.0% of Pulse Seismic shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 46.9% of Calfrac Well Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Pulse Seismic has a net margin of 27.77% compared to Calfrac Well Services' net margin of 3.29%. Pulse Seismic's return on equity of 45.85% beat Calfrac Well Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pulse Seismic	27.77%	45.85%	32.06%
Calfrac Well Services	3.29%	6.49%	6.32%

Calfrac Well Services has a consensus target price of C$7.75, suggesting a potential upside of 21.86%. Given Calfrac Well Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Calfrac Well Services is more favorable than Pulse Seismic.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pulse Seismic	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Calfrac Well Services	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Pulse Seismic has a beta of 0.252949, indicating that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Calfrac Well Services has a beta of -0.370789, indicating that its share price is 137% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Calfrac Well Services beats Pulse Seismic on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pulse Seismic compare to North American Construction Group?

Pulse Seismic (TSE:PSD) and North American Construction Group (TSE:NOA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Pulse Seismic pays an annual dividend of C$0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. North American Construction Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Pulse Seismic pays out 41.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. North American Construction Group pays out 42.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Pulse Seismic. North American Construction Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pulse Seismic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pulse Seismic	C$30.18M	5.36	C$10.87M	C$0.17	18.76
North American Construction Group	C$1.26B	0.42	C$56.80M	C$1.12	17.52

19.7% of Pulse Seismic shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.6% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. 23.0% of Pulse Seismic shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.9% of North American Construction Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

North American Construction Group has a consensus price target of C$22.71, suggesting a potential upside of 15.77%. Given North American Construction Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Pulse Seismic.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pulse Seismic	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
North American Construction Group	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63

In the previous week, North American Construction Group had 2 more articles in the media than Pulse Seismic. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for North American Construction Group and 0 mentions for Pulse Seismic. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Pulse Seismic's score of 0.00 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Pulse Seismic	Neutral
North American Construction Group	Positive

Pulse Seismic has a beta of 0.252949, meaning that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, North American Construction Group has a beta of 0.886746, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Pulse Seismic has a net margin of 27.77% compared to North American Construction Group's net margin of 2.63%. Pulse Seismic's return on equity of 45.85% beat North American Construction Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pulse Seismic	27.77%	45.85%	32.06%
North American Construction Group	2.63%	7.69%	6.65%

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Pulse Seismic on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pulse Seismic compare to STEP Energy Services?

Pulse Seismic (TSE:PSD) and STEP Energy Services (TSE:STEP) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment and risk.

Pulse Seismic has a net margin of 27.77% compared to STEP Energy Services' net margin of 4.82%. Pulse Seismic's return on equity of 45.85% beat STEP Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pulse Seismic	27.77%	45.85%	32.06%
STEP Energy Services	4.82%	9.31%	9.15%

Pulse Seismic has a beta of 0.252949, indicating that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, STEP Energy Services has a beta of 1.595161, indicating that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

19.7% of Pulse Seismic shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.9% of STEP Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. 23.0% of Pulse Seismic shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of STEP Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

STEP Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Pulse Seismic. STEP Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pulse Seismic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pulse Seismic	C$30.18M	5.36	C$10.87M	C$0.17	18.76
STEP Energy Services	C$910.44M	0.44	C$41.05M	-C$0.11	N/A

In the previous week, Pulse Seismic's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled STEP Energy Services'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Pulse Seismic	Neutral
STEP Energy Services	Neutral

Summary

Pulse Seismic beats STEP Energy Services on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pulse Seismic compare to Source Energy Services?

Pulse Seismic (TSE:PSD) and Source Energy Services (TSE:SHLE) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Pulse Seismic's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Source Energy Services'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Pulse Seismic	Neutral
Source Energy Services	Neutral

Source Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Pulse Seismic. Pulse Seismic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Source Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pulse Seismic	C$30.18M	5.36	C$10.87M	C$0.17	18.76
Source Energy Services	C$651.96M	0.25	C$169.48M	C$0.49	25.67

Pulse Seismic has a net margin of 27.77% compared to Source Energy Services' net margin of 0.95%. Pulse Seismic's return on equity of 45.85% beat Source Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pulse Seismic	27.77%	45.85%	32.06%
Source Energy Services	0.95%	2.93%	6.78%

Pulse Seismic has a beta of 0.252949, suggesting that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Source Energy Services has a beta of 1.352221, suggesting that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

19.7% of Pulse Seismic shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.2% of Source Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. 23.0% of Pulse Seismic shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 11.1% of Source Energy Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Pulse Seismic beats Source Energy Services on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pulse Seismic compare to Enterprise Group?

Enterprise Group (TSE:E) and Pulse Seismic (TSE:PSD) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

1.0% of Enterprise Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.7% of Pulse Seismic shares are owned by institutional investors. 39.6% of Enterprise Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.0% of Pulse Seismic shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pulse Seismic has a net margin of 27.77% compared to Enterprise Group's net margin of 7.79%. Pulse Seismic's return on equity of 45.85% beat Enterprise Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Enterprise Group	7.79%	3.39%	9.17%
Pulse Seismic	27.77%	45.85%	32.06%

Pulse Seismic has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Enterprise Group. Pulse Seismic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enterprise Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Enterprise Group	C$38.03M	3.57	C$7.94M	C$0.03	55.67
Pulse Seismic	C$30.18M	5.36	C$10.87M	C$0.17	18.76

Enterprise Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.69 per share and has a dividend yield of 41.3%. Pulse Seismic pays an annual dividend of C$0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Enterprise Group pays out 2,300.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pulse Seismic pays out 41.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Enterprise Group has a beta of 0.918302, meaning that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pulse Seismic has a beta of 0.252949, meaning that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Enterprise Group had 1 more articles in the media than Pulse Seismic. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Enterprise Group and 0 mentions for Pulse Seismic. Enterprise Group's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Pulse Seismic's score of 0.00 indicating that Enterprise Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Enterprise Group	Positive
Pulse Seismic	Neutral

Enterprise Group presently has a consensus price target of C$1.80, suggesting a potential upside of 7.78%. Given Enterprise Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Enterprise Group is more favorable than Pulse Seismic.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Enterprise Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Pulse Seismic	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

Enterprise Group beats Pulse Seismic on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pulse Seismic News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PSD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PSD vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Pulse Seismic	Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry	Energy Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$161.78M	C$542.98M	C$10.39B	C$12.48B
Dividend Yield	2.17%	19.59%	11.37%	6.19%
P/E Ratio	18.76	13.49	19.83	36.95
Price / Sales	5.36	113.81	388.93	9.44
Price / Cash	16.57	26.69	36.99	82.29
Price / Book	16.19	2.12	4.14	4.39
Net Income	C$10.87M	C$38.57M	C$4.25B	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-0.62%	0.59%	1.41%	0.61%
1 Month Performance	-2.45%	2.34%	3.01%	1.06%
1 Year Performance	-11.63%	27.30%	29.33%	30.89%

Pulse Seismic Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count
PSD Pulse Seismic	N/A	C$3.19 -2.4%	N/A	-11.9%	C$161.78M	C$30.18M	18.76	15
CFW Calfrac Well Services	3.7797 of 5 stars	C$6.41 -0.3%	C$7.75 +20.9%	+75.7%	C$644.03M	C$1.32B	13.93	730
NOA North American Construction Group	4.3425 of 5 stars	C$19.70 -0.5%	C$22.71 +15.3%	-9.0%	C$533.93M	C$1.26B	17.59	200
STEP STEP Energy Services	N/A	C$5.49 -0.2%	N/A	+20.7%	C$400.15M	C$910.44M	N/A	1,432
SHLE Source Energy Services	N/A	C$12.40 +1.5%	N/A	-7.4%	C$162.03M	C$651.96M	25.31	451

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:PSD) was last updated on 7/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Pulse Seismic (PSD) Competitors

PSD vs. CFW, NOA, STEP, SHLE, and E

How does Pulse Seismic compare to Calfrac Well Services?

Summary

How does Pulse Seismic compare to North American Construction Group?

Summary

How does Pulse Seismic compare to STEP Energy Services?

Summary

How does Pulse Seismic compare to Source Energy Services?

Summary

How does Pulse Seismic compare to Enterprise Group?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PSD vs. The Competition

Pulse Seismic Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Pulse Seismic (PSD) Competitors

PSD vs. CFW, NOA, STEP, SHLE, and E

How does Pulse Seismic compare to Calfrac Well Services?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, PSD or CFW?

Does the media favor PSD or CFW?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in PSD or CFW?

Is PSD or CFW more profitable?

Do analysts prefer PSD or CFW?

Which has more volatility and risk, PSD or CFW?

Summary

How does Pulse Seismic compare to North American Construction Group?

Is PSD or NOA a better dividend stock?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, PSD or NOA?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of PSD or NOA?

Do analysts prefer PSD or NOA?

Does the media refer more to PSD or NOA?

Which has more volatility & risk, PSD or NOA?

Is PSD or NOA more profitable?

Summary

How does Pulse Seismic compare to STEP Energy Services?

Is PSD or STEP more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, PSD or STEP?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of PSD or STEP?

Which has better earnings & valuation, PSD or STEP?

Does the media prefer PSD or STEP?

Summary

How does Pulse Seismic compare to Source Energy Services?

Does the media prefer PSD or SHLE?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, PSD or SHLE?

Is PSD or SHLE more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, PSD or SHLE?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in PSD or SHLE?

Summary

How does Pulse Seismic compare to Enterprise Group?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in E or PSD?

Is E or PSD more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, E or PSD?

Is E or PSD a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, E or PSD?

Does the media refer more to E or PSD?

Do analysts recommend E or PSD?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PSD vs. The Competition

Pulse Seismic Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools