Go Pro
→ Why I'm sending this one to my own family (From Behind the Markets) (Ad)tc pixel Free MCB Stock Alerts

McCoy Global (MCB) Competitors

McCoy Global logo
C$2.28 +0.04 (+1.79%)
As of 01:48 PM Eastern
Compare

MCB vs. ACX, PSD, SHLE, E, and CWC

Should you buy McCoy Global stock or one of its competitors? McCoy Global's main competitors and comparable companies include ACT Energy Technologies (ACX), Pulse Seismic (PSD), Source Energy Services (SHLE), Enterprise Group (E), and CWC Energy Services (CWC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas equipment & services" industry.

How does McCoy Global compare to ACT Energy Technologies?

McCoy Global (TSE:MCB) and ACT Energy Technologies (TSE:ACX) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends and institutional ownership.

4.5% of McCoy Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.2% of ACT Energy Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of McCoy Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, ACT Energy Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than McCoy Global. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for ACT Energy Technologies and 0 mentions for McCoy Global. ACT Energy Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat McCoy Global's score of 0.00 indicating that ACT Energy Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
McCoy Global Neutral
ACT Energy Technologies Positive

McCoy Global currently has a consensus target price of C$5.50, indicating a potential upside of 141.23%. ACT Energy Technologies has a consensus target price of C$9.67, indicating a potential upside of 47.58%. Given McCoy Global's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe McCoy Global is more favorable than ACT Energy Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
McCoy Global
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
ACT Energy Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

McCoy Global has a beta of 0.062269, meaning that its stock price is 94% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ACT Energy Technologies has a beta of 0.087601, meaning that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market.

ACT Energy Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than McCoy Global. ACT Energy Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McCoy Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
McCoy GlobalC$73.80M0.84C$7.71MC$0.1812.67
ACT Energy TechnologiesC$550.50M0.46C$26.98MC$0.709.36

McCoy Global has a net margin of 5.46% compared to ACT Energy Technologies' net margin of 0.00%. McCoy Global's return on equity of 5.44% beat ACT Energy Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
McCoy Global5.46% 5.44% 7.69%
ACT Energy Technologies N/A N/A N/A

Summary

ACT Energy Technologies beats McCoy Global on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McCoy Global compare to Pulse Seismic?

Pulse Seismic (TSE:PSD) and McCoy Global (TSE:MCB) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and risk.

19.7% of Pulse Seismic shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.5% of McCoy Global shares are held by institutional investors. 23.0% of Pulse Seismic shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of McCoy Global shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pulse Seismic pays an annual dividend of C$0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. McCoy Global pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Pulse Seismic pays out 712.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. McCoy Global pays out 41.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. McCoy Global is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Pulse Seismic's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled McCoy Global'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pulse Seismic Neutral
McCoy Global Neutral

McCoy Global has a consensus price target of C$5.50, suggesting a potential upside of 141.23%. Given McCoy Global's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe McCoy Global is more favorable than Pulse Seismic.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pulse Seismic
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
McCoy Global
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Pulse Seismic has higher earnings, but lower revenue than McCoy Global. McCoy Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pulse Seismic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pulse SeismicC$15.47M9.77C$10.87MC$0.01298.00
McCoy GlobalC$73.80M0.84C$7.71MC$0.1812.67

Pulse Seismic has a beta of 0.206979, suggesting that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, McCoy Global has a beta of 0.062269, suggesting that its stock price is 94% less volatile than the broader market.

McCoy Global has a net margin of 5.46% compared to Pulse Seismic's net margin of 2.42%. McCoy Global's return on equity of 5.44% beat Pulse Seismic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pulse Seismic2.42% 2.74% 32.06%
McCoy Global 5.46%5.44%7.69%

Summary

McCoy Global beats Pulse Seismic on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McCoy Global compare to Source Energy Services?

Source Energy Services (TSE:SHLE) and McCoy Global (TSE:MCB) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Source Energy Services had 1 more articles in the media than McCoy Global. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Source Energy Services and 0 mentions for McCoy Global. Source Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat McCoy Global's score of 0.00 indicating that Source Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Source Energy Services Positive
McCoy Global Neutral

1.2% of Source Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.5% of McCoy Global shares are held by institutional investors. 11.1% of Source Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of McCoy Global shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Source Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than McCoy Global. Source Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McCoy Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Source Energy ServicesC$587.19M0.28C$169.48M-C$0.95N/A
McCoy GlobalC$73.80M0.84C$7.71MC$0.1812.67

McCoy Global has a consensus target price of C$5.50, indicating a potential upside of 141.23%. Given McCoy Global's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe McCoy Global is more favorable than Source Energy Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Source Energy Services
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
McCoy Global
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Source Energy Services has a beta of 1.290165, indicating that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, McCoy Global has a beta of 0.062269, indicating that its stock price is 94% less volatile than the broader market.

McCoy Global has a net margin of 5.46% compared to Source Energy Services' net margin of -2.21%. McCoy Global's return on equity of 5.44% beat Source Energy Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Source Energy Services-2.21% -6.25% 6.78%
McCoy Global 5.46%5.44%7.69%

Summary

McCoy Global beats Source Energy Services on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McCoy Global compare to Enterprise Group?

McCoy Global (TSE:MCB) and Enterprise Group (TSE:E) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

McCoy Global currently has a consensus target price of C$5.50, suggesting a potential upside of 141.23%. Enterprise Group has a consensus target price of C$1.80, suggesting a potential upside of 1.12%. Given McCoy Global's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe McCoy Global is more favorable than Enterprise Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
McCoy Global
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Enterprise Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

McCoy Global pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Enterprise Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.69 per share and has a dividend yield of 38.8%. McCoy Global pays out 41.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enterprise Group pays out 2,300.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, McCoy Global's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Enterprise Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
McCoy Global Neutral
Enterprise Group Neutral

Enterprise Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than McCoy Global. McCoy Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enterprise Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
McCoy GlobalC$73.80M0.84C$7.71MC$0.1812.67
Enterprise GroupC$38.03M3.80C$7.94MC$0.0359.33

Enterprise Group has a net margin of 7.79% compared to McCoy Global's net margin of 5.46%. McCoy Global's return on equity of 5.44% beat Enterprise Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
McCoy Global5.46% 5.44% 7.69%
Enterprise Group 7.79%3.39%9.17%

McCoy Global has a beta of 0.062269, indicating that its stock price is 94% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enterprise Group has a beta of 0.931024, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

4.5% of McCoy Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.2% of Enterprise Group shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of McCoy Global shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 39.6% of Enterprise Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Enterprise Group beats McCoy Global on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McCoy Global compare to CWC Energy Services?

McCoy Global (TSE:MCB) and CWC Energy Services (CVE:CWC) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

McCoy Global has a beta of 0.062269, meaning that its share price is 94% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CWC Energy Services has a beta of 1.78, meaning that its share price is 78% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, McCoy Global's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CWC Energy Services'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
McCoy Global Neutral
CWC Energy Services Neutral

McCoy Global currently has a consensus price target of C$5.50, suggesting a potential upside of 141.23%. Given McCoy Global's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe McCoy Global is more favorable than CWC Energy Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
McCoy Global
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
CWC Energy Services
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

CWC Energy Services has a net margin of 20.29% compared to McCoy Global's net margin of 5.46%. CWC Energy Services' return on equity of 22.30% beat McCoy Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
McCoy Global5.46% 5.44% 7.69%
CWC Energy Services 20.29%22.30%6.62%

CWC Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than McCoy Global. CWC Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McCoy Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
McCoy GlobalC$73.80M0.84C$7.71MC$0.1812.67
CWC Energy ServicesC$207.84M0.40C$42.17MC$0.081.96

4.5% of McCoy Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.3% of CWC Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of McCoy Global shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of CWC Energy Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

McCoy Global pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. CWC Energy Services pays an annual dividend of C$0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. McCoy Global pays out 41.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CWC Energy Services pays out 12.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CWC Energy Services is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

CWC Energy Services beats McCoy Global on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get McCoy Global News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MCB and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MCB and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MCB vs. The Competition

Export
MetricMcCoy GlobalEnergy Equipment & Services IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$61.90MC$3.74BC$9.75BC$12.55B
Dividend Yield4.50%13.37%11.58%6.20%
P/E Ratio12.6745.0920.1130.72
Price / Sales0.8431.45397.129.75
Price / Cash3.2121.1036.0882.29
Price / Book0.902.192.984.64
Net IncomeC$7.71MC$61.96MC$4.32BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance2.70%5.49%3.55%0.91%
1 Month Performance5.07%5.20%4.35%3.88%
1 Year Performance-25.49%57.51%38.75%36.14%

McCoy Global Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MCB
McCoy Global
N/AC$2.28
+1.8%		C$5.50
+141.2%		-27.5%C$61.90MC$73.80M12.67132
ACX
ACT Energy Technologies
2.8348 of 5 stars		C$6.04
+1.2%		C$9.67
+60.0%		+39.5%C$230.13MC$484.03M16.78N/A
PSD
Pulse Seismic
N/AC$3.16
-0.3%		N/A-21.4%C$160.26MC$15.47M316.0015
SHLE
Source Energy Services
N/AC$11.93
-0.7%		N/A-7.2%C$155.89MC$587.19MN/A451
E
Enterprise Group
0.1601 of 5 stars		C$1.61
-1.2%		C$1.80
+11.8%		+17.9%C$130.75MC$38.03M53.6732,700

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:MCB) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s New Currency Reset
Trump is launching a new $250 bill - but that may be a distraction. Behind the scenes, Executive Order 14241 i...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why I'm sending this one to my own family
Behind the Markets editor Kelly Maguire says she has never sent an email quite like this one. A sealed congres...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
The Starlink of Energy
A portable energy unit - already used by the U.S. Navy for decades - is now drawing serious attention from Big...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ray Dalio: Buy Gold. Get Paid.
Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, is urging investors to hold 15% of their portfolio in gold and c...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why November 27 Is Quickly Becoming America's Most Important Financial Date in Decades
An estimated $10 trillion could move through a little known government initiative, according to analyst Joel L...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Leading AI Insider Issues Urgent Market Warning
A leading AI pioneer has spent $17 million on AI research and tools since 2022, building a platform now used b...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel