Go Pro
→ ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow! (From Weiss Ratings) (Ad)tc pixel Free MCB Stock Alerts

McCoy Global (MCB) Competitors

McCoy Global logo
C$2.27 +0.01 (+0.44%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern
Compare

MCB vs. PSD, SHLE, E, CWC, and AVE

Should you buy McCoy Global stock or one of its competitors? McCoy Global's main competitors and comparable companies include Pulse Seismic (PSD), Source Energy Services (SHLE), Enterprise Group (E), CWC Energy Services (CWC), and Aveda Transportation and Energy Services (AVE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas equipment & services" industry.

How does McCoy Global compare to Pulse Seismic?

McCoy Global (TSE:MCB) and Pulse Seismic (TSE:PSD) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

McCoy Global pays an annual dividend of C$0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Pulse Seismic pays an annual dividend of C$0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. McCoy Global pays out 35.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pulse Seismic pays out 712.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, McCoy Global's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pulse Seismic'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
McCoy Global Neutral
Pulse Seismic Neutral

4.5% of McCoy Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.7% of Pulse Seismic shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of McCoy Global shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.0% of Pulse Seismic shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

McCoy Global has a net margin of 5.46% compared to Pulse Seismic's net margin of 2.42%. McCoy Global's return on equity of 5.44% beat Pulse Seismic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
McCoy Global5.46% 5.44% 7.69%
Pulse Seismic 2.42%2.74%32.06%

Pulse Seismic has lower revenue, but higher earnings than McCoy Global. McCoy Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pulse Seismic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
McCoy GlobalC$66.98M0.92C$7.71MC$0.1416.21
Pulse SeismicC$15.47M9.80C$10.87MC$0.01299.00

McCoy Global has a beta of 0.062269, indicating that its share price is 94% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pulse Seismic has a beta of 0.197835, indicating that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pulse Seismic beats McCoy Global on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McCoy Global compare to Source Energy Services?

McCoy Global (TSE:MCB) and Source Energy Services (TSE:SHLE) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, Source Energy Services had 1 more articles in the media than McCoy Global. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Source Energy Services and 0 mentions for McCoy Global. Source Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat McCoy Global's score of 0.00 indicating that Source Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
McCoy Global Neutral
Source Energy Services Positive

Source Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than McCoy Global. Source Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McCoy Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
McCoy GlobalC$66.98M0.92C$7.71MC$0.1416.21
Source Energy ServicesC$587.19M0.26C$169.48M-C$0.95N/A

McCoy Global has a net margin of 5.46% compared to Source Energy Services' net margin of -2.21%. McCoy Global's return on equity of 5.44% beat Source Energy Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
McCoy Global5.46% 5.44% 7.69%
Source Energy Services -2.21%-6.25%6.78%

4.5% of McCoy Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.2% of Source Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of McCoy Global shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.1% of Source Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

McCoy Global has a beta of 0.062269, suggesting that its share price is 94% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Source Energy Services has a beta of 1.089884, suggesting that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

McCoy Global beats Source Energy Services on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McCoy Global compare to Enterprise Group?

Enterprise Group (TSE:E) and McCoy Global (TSE:MCB) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Enterprise Group had 2 more articles in the media than McCoy Global. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Enterprise Group and 0 mentions for McCoy Global. Enterprise Group's average media sentiment score of 0.31 beat McCoy Global's score of 0.00 indicating that Enterprise Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Enterprise Group Neutral
McCoy Global Neutral

1.2% of Enterprise Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.5% of McCoy Global shares are held by institutional investors. 39.6% of Enterprise Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of McCoy Global shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Enterprise Group has a net margin of 9.49% compared to McCoy Global's net margin of 5.46%. McCoy Global's return on equity of 5.44% beat Enterprise Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Enterprise Group9.49% 4.32% 9.17%
McCoy Global 5.46%5.44%7.69%

Enterprise Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.69 per share and has a dividend yield of 46.3%. McCoy Global pays an annual dividend of C$0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Enterprise Group pays out 1,380.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. McCoy Global pays out 35.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Enterprise Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than McCoy Global. McCoy Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enterprise Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Enterprise GroupC$40.37M2.99C$7.94MC$0.0529.80
McCoy GlobalC$66.98M0.92C$7.71MC$0.1416.21

Enterprise Group presently has a consensus price target of C$2.05, indicating a potential upside of 37.58%. Given Enterprise Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Enterprise Group is more favorable than McCoy Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Enterprise Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
McCoy Global
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Enterprise Group has a beta of 0.81627, suggesting that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, McCoy Global has a beta of 0.062269, suggesting that its stock price is 94% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Enterprise Group beats McCoy Global on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McCoy Global compare to CWC Energy Services?

McCoy Global (TSE:MCB) and CWC Energy Services (CVE:CWC) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

CWC Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than McCoy Global. CWC Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McCoy Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
McCoy GlobalC$66.98M0.92C$7.71MC$0.1416.21
CWC Energy ServicesC$207.84M0.40C$42.17MC$0.081.96

McCoy Global has a beta of 0.062269, meaning that its stock price is 94% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CWC Energy Services has a beta of 1.78, meaning that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CWC Energy Services had 1 more articles in the media than McCoy Global. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CWC Energy Services and 0 mentions for McCoy Global. CWC Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat McCoy Global's score of 0.00 indicating that CWC Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
McCoy Global Neutral
CWC Energy Services Positive

McCoy Global pays an annual dividend of C$0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. CWC Energy Services pays an annual dividend of C$0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. McCoy Global pays out 35.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CWC Energy Services pays out 12.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CWC Energy Services is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

CWC Energy Services has a net margin of 20.29% compared to McCoy Global's net margin of 5.46%. CWC Energy Services' return on equity of 22.30% beat McCoy Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
McCoy Global5.46% 5.44% 7.69%
CWC Energy Services 20.29%22.30%6.62%

4.5% of McCoy Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.3% of CWC Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of McCoy Global shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of CWC Energy Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

CWC Energy Services beats McCoy Global on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McCoy Global compare to Aveda Transportation and Energy Services?

McCoy Global (TSE:MCB) and Aveda Transportation and Energy Services (CVE:AVE) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

In the previous week, Aveda Transportation and Energy Services had 1 more articles in the media than McCoy Global. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Aveda Transportation and Energy Services and 0 mentions for McCoy Global. Aveda Transportation and Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat McCoy Global's score of 0.00 indicating that Aveda Transportation and Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
McCoy Global Neutral
Aveda Transportation and Energy Services Positive

McCoy Global has a net margin of 5.46% compared to Aveda Transportation and Energy Services' net margin of 0.00%. McCoy Global's return on equity of 5.44% beat Aveda Transportation and Energy Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
McCoy Global5.46% 5.44% 7.69%
Aveda Transportation and Energy Services N/A N/A N/A

4.5% of McCoy Global shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of McCoy Global shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

McCoy Global has higher revenue and earnings than Aveda Transportation and Energy Services.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
McCoy GlobalC$66.98M0.92C$7.71MC$0.1416.21
Aveda Transportation and Energy ServicesN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Summary

McCoy Global beats Aveda Transportation and Energy Services on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get McCoy Global News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MCB and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MCB and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MCB vs. The Competition

Export
MetricMcCoy GlobalEnergy Equipment & Services IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$61.69MC$3.90BC$10.16BC$12.57B
Dividend Yield4.35%13.34%11.47%6.25%
P/E Ratio16.2145.2722.0439.47
Price / Sales0.9232.20511.279.82
Price / Cash3.2121.2436.2682.29
Price / Book0.902.253.124.71
Net IncomeC$7.71MC$67.81MC$4.33BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-0.87%0.98%1.37%-1.21%
1 Month Performance4.13%5.36%6.54%4.89%
1 Year Performance-33.04%48.62%38.64%28.63%

McCoy Global Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MCB
McCoy Global
N/AC$2.27
+0.4%		N/A-35.2%C$61.69MC$66.98M16.21132
PSD
Pulse Seismic
N/AC$3.01
+1.7%		N/A-25.9%C$152.65MC$15.47M301.0015
SHLE
Source Energy Services
N/AC$11.70
+1.3%		N/A-17.1%C$152.18MC$587.19MN/A451
E
Enterprise Group
2.1117 of 5 stars		C$1.48
-1.3%		C$2.05
+38.5%		+2.8%C$119.84MC$40.37M29.6032,700
CWC
CWC Energy Services
N/AC$0.16
-5.9%		N/A+0.0%C$82.81MC$207.84M1.96665

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:MCB) was last updated on 9/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel