PIC.A vs. GS, OLY, DC.A, URB, XLY, AIM, SBC, PBY.UN, DF, and GDV
Should you be buying Premium Income stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Premium Income include Gluskin Sheff + Associates (GS), Olympia Financial Group (OLY), Dundee (DC.A), Urbana (URB), Auxly Cannabis Group (XLY), Aimia (AIM), Brompton Split Banc (SBC), Canso Credit Trust - Canso Credit Income Fund (PBY.UN), Dividend 15 Split Corp. II (DF), and Global Dividend Growth Split (GDV). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.
Premium Income vs. Its Competitors
Gluskin Sheff + Associates (TSE:GS) and Premium Income (TSE:PIC.A) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.
0.0% of Premium Income shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Premium Income. Gluskin Sheff + Associates is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Premium Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays an annual dividend of C$1.00 per share. Premium Income pays an annual dividend of C$1.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.7%. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays out 123.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Premium Income pays out 33.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Premium Income is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.
Premium Income has a net margin of 17.94% compared to Gluskin Sheff + Associates' net margin of 0.00%. Premium Income's return on equity of 7.93% beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' return on equity.
In the previous week, Premium Income had 3 more articles in the media than Gluskin Sheff + Associates. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Premium Income and 0 mentions for Gluskin Sheff + Associates. Premium Income's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' score of 0.00 indicating that Premium Income is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Summary
Premium Income beats Gluskin Sheff + Associates on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Premium Income News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PIC.A and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PIC.A and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
PIC.A vs. The Competition
Premium Income Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (TSE:PIC.A) was last updated on 9/6/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
Free PIC.A Stock Alerts