Free Trial

Premium Income (PIC.A) Competitors

Premium Income logo
C$9.41 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 03:59 PM Eastern

PIC.A vs. FSZ, SBC, DC.A, URB, and OLY

Should you be buying Premium Income stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Premium Income include Fiera Capital (FSZ), Brompton Split Banc (SBC), Dundee (DC.A), Urbana (URB), and Olympia Financial Group (OLY). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Premium Income compare to Fiera Capital?

Fiera Capital (TSE:FSZ) and Premium Income (TSE:PIC.A) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and risk.

6.1% of Fiera Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Premium Income shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Fiera Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Fiera Capital presently has a consensus price target of C$5.63, suggesting a potential upside of 0.00%. Given Fiera Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Fiera Capital is more favorable than Premium Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fiera Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.76
Premium Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Fiera Capital pays an annual dividend of C$0.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.6%. Premium Income pays an annual dividend of C$0.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.4%. Fiera Capital pays out 158.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Premium Income pays out 18.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Premium Income has a net margin of 17.94% compared to Fiera Capital's net margin of 11.65%. Fiera Capital's return on equity of 14.44% beat Premium Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fiera Capital11.65% 14.44% 7.03%
Premium Income 17.94%7.93%3.82%

In the previous week, Fiera Capital had 3 more articles in the media than Premium Income. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Fiera Capital and 1 mentions for Premium Income. Fiera Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.10 beat Premium Income's score of 0.00 indicating that Fiera Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fiera Capital
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Premium Income
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Fiera Capital has a beta of 1.042325, indicating that its share price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Premium Income has a beta of 1.206858, indicating that its share price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Fiera Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Premium Income. Premium Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fiera Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fiera CapitalC$666.38M0.90C$64.93MC$0.3416.56
Premium IncomeN/AN/AC$3.78MC$4.362.16

Summary

Fiera Capital beats Premium Income on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Premium Income compare to Brompton Split Banc?

Premium Income (TSE:PIC.A) and Brompton Split Banc (TSE:SBC) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Brompton Split Banc has higher revenue and earnings than Premium Income. Premium Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brompton Split Banc, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Premium IncomeN/AN/AC$3.78MC$4.362.16
Brompton Split BancC$128.12M3.29C$26.84MC$3.653.56

0.0% of Premium Income shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of Brompton Split Banc shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Premium Income has a beta of 1.206858, meaning that its share price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brompton Split Banc has a beta of 0.442653, meaning that its share price is 56% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Premium Income pays an annual dividend of C$0.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.4%. Brompton Split Banc pays an annual dividend of C$0.85 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Premium Income pays out 18.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brompton Split Banc pays out 23.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Premium Income is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Premium Income and Premium Income both had 1 articles in the media. Brompton Split Banc's average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Premium Income's score of 0.00 indicating that Brompton Split Banc is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Premium Income
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Brompton Split Banc
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Brompton Split Banc has a net margin of 238.43% compared to Premium Income's net margin of 17.94%. Brompton Split Banc's return on equity of 49.87% beat Premium Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Premium Income17.94% 7.93% 3.82%
Brompton Split Banc 238.43%49.87%5.28%

Summary

Brompton Split Banc beats Premium Income on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Premium Income compare to Dundee?

Premium Income (TSE:PIC.A) and Dundee (TSE:DC.A) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

In the previous week, Premium Income had 1 more articles in the media than Dundee. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Premium Income and 0 mentions for Dundee. Premium Income's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Dundee'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Premium Income Neutral
Dundee Neutral

Dundee has a net margin of 478.33% compared to Premium Income's net margin of 17.94%. Dundee's return on equity of 9.20% beat Premium Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Premium Income17.94% 7.93% 3.82%
Dundee 478.33%9.20%-2.18%

Dundee has higher revenue and earnings than Premium Income. Dundee is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Premium Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Premium IncomeN/AN/AC$3.78MC$4.362.16
DundeeC$5.36M68.66C$30.73MC$3.271.25

Premium Income has a beta of 1.206858, meaning that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dundee has a beta of 1.147225, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500.

0.0% of Premium Income shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.8% of Dundee shares are held by institutional investors. 17.2% of Dundee shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Dundee beats Premium Income on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Premium Income compare to Urbana?

Premium Income (TSE:PIC.A) and Urbana (TSE:URB) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Urbana has higher revenue and earnings than Premium Income. Premium Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Urbana, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Premium IncomeN/AN/AC$3.78MC$4.362.16
UrbanaC$81.77M4.66C$66.13MC$1.675.51

Premium Income has a beta of 1.206858, meaning that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Urbana has a beta of 0.0824, meaning that its stock price is 92% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Premium Income pays an annual dividend of C$0.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.4%. Urbana pays an annual dividend of C$0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Premium Income pays out 18.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Urbana pays out 7.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Urbana had 4 more articles in the media than Premium Income. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Urbana and 1 mentions for Premium Income. Premium Income's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Urbana's score of -0.08 indicating that Premium Income is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Premium Income
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Urbana
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Urbana has a net margin of 146.38% compared to Premium Income's net margin of 17.94%. Urbana's return on equity of 13.92% beat Premium Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Premium Income17.94% 7.93% 3.82%
Urbana 146.38%13.92%16.83%

0.0% of Premium Income shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.9% of Urbana shares are held by institutional investors. 57.6% of Urbana shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Urbana beats Premium Income on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Premium Income compare to Olympia Financial Group?

Premium Income (TSE:PIC.A) and Olympia Financial Group (TSE:OLY) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Olympia Financial Group has higher revenue and earnings than Premium Income. Premium Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Olympia Financial Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Premium IncomeN/AN/AC$3.78MC$4.362.16
Olympia Financial GroupC$98.10M3.02C$24.45MC$8.2514.91

Premium Income has a beta of 1.206858, suggesting that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Olympia Financial Group has a beta of 0.324322, suggesting that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Premium Income pays an annual dividend of C$0.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.4%. Olympia Financial Group pays an annual dividend of C$7.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Premium Income pays out 18.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Olympia Financial Group pays out 87.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Premium Income is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Premium Income had 1 more articles in the media than Olympia Financial Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Premium Income and 0 mentions for Olympia Financial Group. Premium Income's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Olympia Financial Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Premium Income Neutral
Olympia Financial Group Neutral

Olympia Financial Group has a net margin of 20.20% compared to Premium Income's net margin of 17.94%. Olympia Financial Group's return on equity of 45.15% beat Premium Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Premium Income17.94% 7.93% 3.82%
Olympia Financial Group 20.20%45.15%35.88%

Olympia Financial Group has a consensus price target of C$167.49, suggesting a potential upside of 36.16%. Given Olympia Financial Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Olympia Financial Group is more favorable than Premium Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Premium Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Olympia Financial Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

0.0% of Premium Income shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of Olympia Financial Group shares are held by institutional investors. 34.6% of Olympia Financial Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Olympia Financial Group beats Premium Income on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Premium Income News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PIC.A and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PIC.A and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PIC.A vs. The Competition

MetricPremium IncomeAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$180.73MC$2.32BC$5.61BC$11.72B
Dividend Yield8.77%5.98%5.26%6.22%
P/E Ratio2.1625.7215.8223.83
Price / SalesN/A2,043.85979.4413.46
Price / Cash0.3060.1849.1382.69
Price / Book3.401.354.424.48
Net IncomeC$3.78MC$265.53MC$1.15BC$300.68M
7 Day Performance-10.30%1.71%1.03%0.12%
1 Month Performance4.79%5.35%4.08%2.88%
1 Year Performance79.24%14.75%21.65%57.78%

Premium Income Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PIC.A
Premium Income
N/AC$9.41
flat
N/AN/AC$180.73MN/A2.16N/A
FSZ
Fiera Capital
N/AC$5.69
-0.4%
C$6.25
+9.8%
N/AC$603.51MC$666.38M16.74845
SBC
Brompton Split Banc
N/AC$12.99
-0.8%
N/AN/AC$421.37MC$128.12M3.5640
DC.A
Dundee
N/AC$4.35
-1.4%
N/AN/AC$390.77MC$5.36M1.33N/A
URB
Urbana
N/AC$9.13
-3.3%
N/AN/AC$377.94MC$81.77M5.472

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:PIC.A) was last updated on 5/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners