Go Pro
→ 4th of July Chaikin flash sale (From Chaikin Analytics) (Ad)tc pixel Free QSR Stock Alerts

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) Competitors

Restaurant Brands International logo
C$106.15 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 07/3/2026 04:17 PM Eastern
Compare

QSR vs. H, BYD, MTY, CMG, and TH

Should you buy Restaurant Brands International stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Restaurant Brands International with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Restaurant Brands International include Hydro One (H), Boyd Group Services (BYD), MTY Food Group (MTY), Computer Modelling Group (CMG), and Theratechnologies (TH). These companies are all part of the "restaurants, hotels, motels" industry.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Hydro One?

Hydro One (TSE:H) and Restaurant Brands International (TSE:QSR) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, risk and media sentiment.

Hydro One has a net margin of 14.78% compared to Restaurant Brands International's net margin of 9.96%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 27.13% beat Hydro One's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hydro One14.78% 10.87% 3.57%
Restaurant Brands International 9.96%27.13%5.81%

23.1% of Hydro One shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.9% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. 47.1% of Hydro One shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hydro One has a beta of 0.349922, suggesting that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.387118, suggesting that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

Hydro One currently has a consensus price target of C$57.09, suggesting a potential downside of 3.15%. Restaurant Brands International has a consensus price target of C$84.00, suggesting a potential downside of 20.87%. Given Hydro One's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Hydro One is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hydro One
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.11
Restaurant Brands International
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Hydro One has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Restaurant Brands International. Hydro One is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restaurant Brands International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hydro OneC$9.28B3.81C$1.14BC$2.2825.86
Restaurant Brands InternationalC$9.59B3.84C$793.99MC$2.8337.51

Hydro One pays an annual dividend of C$1.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of C$2.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Hydro One pays out 58.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International pays out 88.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 4 more articles in the media than Hydro One. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 0 mentions for Hydro One. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Hydro One's score of -0.76 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hydro One Negative
Restaurant Brands International Positive

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Hydro One on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Boyd Group Services?

Restaurant Brands International (TSE:QSR) and Boyd Group Services (TSE:BYD) are both consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and media sentiment.

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 9.96% compared to Boyd Group Services' net margin of 0.40%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 27.13% beat Boyd Group Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Restaurant Brands International9.96% 27.13% 5.81%
Boyd Group Services 0.40%1.04%3.95%

66.9% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.3% of Boyd Group Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Boyd Group Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Restaurant Brands International presently has a consensus price target of C$84.00, indicating a potential downside of 20.87%. Boyd Group Services has a consensus price target of C$236.92, indicating a potential upside of 72.26%. Given Boyd Group Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Boyd Group Services is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Restaurant Brands International
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Boyd Group Services
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.08

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of C$2.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Boyd Group Services pays an annual dividend of C$0.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 88.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Boyd Group Services pays out 67.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Restaurant Brands International has higher revenue and earnings than Boyd Group Services. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Boyd Group Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands InternationalC$9.59B3.84C$793.99MC$2.8337.51
Boyd Group ServicesC$3.36B1.14C$29.07MC$0.66208.39

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 3 more articles in the media than Boyd Group Services. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 1 mentions for Boyd Group Services. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Boyd Group Services' score of 0.00 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Restaurant Brands International
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Boyd Group Services
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.387118, meaning that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Boyd Group Services has a beta of 0.99329, meaning that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Boyd Group Services on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to MTY Food Group?

Restaurant Brands International (TSE:QSR) and MTY Food Group (TSE:MTY) are both consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and dividends.

Restaurant Brands International has higher revenue and earnings than MTY Food Group. MTY Food Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restaurant Brands International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands InternationalC$9.59B3.84C$793.99MC$2.8337.51
MTY Food GroupC$1.17B0.74C$93.69MC$6.735.62

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 4 more articles in the media than MTY Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 0 mentions for MTY Food Group. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat MTY Food Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Restaurant Brands International Positive
MTY Food Group Neutral

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus price target of C$84.00, suggesting a potential downside of 20.87%. MTY Food Group has a consensus price target of C$46.00, suggesting a potential upside of 21.53%. Given MTY Food Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe MTY Food Group is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Restaurant Brands International
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
MTY Food Group
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29

MTY Food Group has a net margin of 13.14% compared to Restaurant Brands International's net margin of 9.96%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 27.13% beat MTY Food Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Restaurant Brands International9.96% 27.13% 5.81%
MTY Food Group 13.14%18.59%4.18%

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.387118, indicating that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MTY Food Group has a beta of 1.012246, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

66.9% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.3% of MTY Food Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.5% of MTY Food Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of C$2.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. MTY Food Group pays an annual dividend of C$1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 88.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MTY Food Group pays out 20.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MTY Food Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats MTY Food Group on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Computer Modelling Group?

Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) and Restaurant Brands International (TSE:QSR) are both restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and earnings.

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 2 more articles in the media than Computer Modelling Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 2 mentions for Computer Modelling Group. Computer Modelling Group's average media sentiment score of 1.95 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of 0.77 indicating that Computer Modelling Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Computer Modelling Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Restaurant Brands International
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Computer Modelling Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of C$2.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Computer Modelling Group pays out 38.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International pays out 88.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

40.4% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.9% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Restaurant Brands International has higher revenue and earnings than Computer Modelling Group. Computer Modelling Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restaurant Brands International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Computer Modelling GroupC$126.19M2.28C$23.95MC$0.2117.57
Restaurant Brands InternationalC$9.59B3.84C$793.99MC$2.8337.51

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 13.80% compared to Restaurant Brands International's net margin of 9.96%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 27.13% beat Computer Modelling Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Computer Modelling Group13.80% 20.50% 12.79%
Restaurant Brands International 9.96%27.13%5.81%

Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.821827, suggesting that its share price is 182% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.387118, suggesting that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

Computer Modelling Group currently has a consensus price target of C$5.75, indicating a potential upside of 55.83%. Restaurant Brands International has a consensus price target of C$84.00, indicating a potential downside of 20.87%. Given Computer Modelling Group's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Computer Modelling Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Restaurant Brands International
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Computer Modelling Group on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Theratechnologies?

Restaurant Brands International (TSE:QSR) and Theratechnologies (TSE:TH) are both restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, risk and profitability.

66.9% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Theratechnologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Theratechnologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus target price of C$84.00, indicating a potential downside of 20.87%. Given Restaurant Brands International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Theratechnologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Restaurant Brands International
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Theratechnologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.387118, indicating that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Theratechnologies has a beta of 0.256166, indicating that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 3 more articles in the media than Theratechnologies. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 1 mentions for Theratechnologies. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Theratechnologies' score of 0.00 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Restaurant Brands International
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Theratechnologies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Restaurant Brands International has higher revenue and earnings than Theratechnologies. Theratechnologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restaurant Brands International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands InternationalC$9.59B3.84C$793.99MC$2.8337.51
TheratechnologiesC$84.38M2.44-C$1.96M-C$0.19N/A

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 9.96% compared to Theratechnologies' net margin of -11.81%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 27.13% beat Theratechnologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Restaurant Brands International9.96% 27.13% 5.81%
Theratechnologies -11.81%16.59%5.15%

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Theratechnologies on 17 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Restaurant Brands International News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for QSR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding QSR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

QSR vs. The Competition

Export
MetricRestaurant Brands InternationalRestaurants IndustryCyclical SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$36.83BC$1.83BC$3.72BC$13.07B
Dividend Yield3.59%5.06%3.48%6.18%
P/E Ratio37.519.7180.6436.51
Price / Sales3.8446.26324.8710.33
Price / Cash28.7241.6630.8282.29
Price / Book6.982.243.554.52
Net IncomeC$793.99MC$89.93MC$249.12MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance0.70%1.81%5.90%1.85%
1 Month Performance6.30%2.13%5.40%-1.02%
1 Year Performance14.39%-1.89%3.74%36.76%

Restaurant Brands International Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
QSR
Restaurant Brands International
1.7594 of 5 stars		C$106.15
flat		C$84.00
-20.9%		+14.1%C$36.83BC$9.59B37.516,400
H
Hydro One
1.2677 of 5 stars		C$58.50
-0.8%		C$57.09
-2.4%		+20.7%C$35.11BC$9.28B25.6650,000
BYD
Boyd Group Services
3.2242 of 5 stars		C$134.29
-0.2%		C$236.92
+76.4%		-35.9%C$3.74BC$3.36B203.4715,800
MTY
MTY Food Group
N/AC$37.59
-0.7%		C$46.00
+22.4%		-11.6%C$858.59MC$1.17B5.597,326
CMG
Computer Modelling Group
4.6235 of 5 stars		C$3.58
+2.6%		C$5.75
+60.6%		-50.5%C$279.22MC$126.19M17.05105,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:QSR) was last updated on 7/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
He turned $12,415 into millions. Now he wants to help you.
Tim Sykes turned $12,415 in bar mitzvah money into over $7 million in trading profits - and more than 50 of hi...
Tim Sykes | Sponsoredtc pixel
Goldman Sachs: 300 million jobs will disappear
Goldman Sachs predicts 300 million jobs will disappear - and Elon Musk's 'Project Apex' AI supercomputer is ac...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
PH: Do THESE 4 things to your bank account now …
In a few short months, the US government could gain unprecedented powers over personal bank accounts - includi...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
World’s Largest Investors Are Moving Their Money (Not Into AI)
While headlines focus on the next AI IPO, the world's largest investors are moving capital into one asset at t...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s New Currency Reset
Trump is launching a new $250 bill - but that may be a distraction. Behind the scenes, Executive Order 14241 i...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
The pre-flight check for options traders
Pilots never skip their pre-flight checklist - and neither should options traders. The Smart Trade Options Che...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
They proved it worked in '76. Then buried it.
In 1976, Chevron, Unocal, and Texaco each confirmed the same energy technology worked - no fuel costs, no carb...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel