Restaurant Brands International (QSR) Competitors

C$104.84 +1.66 (+1.61%)

As of 06/12/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

QSR vs. H, BYD, MTY, CMG, and TH

Should you buy Restaurant Brands International stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Restaurant Brands International with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Restaurant Brands International include Hydro One (H), Boyd Group Services (BYD), MTY Food Group (MTY), Computer Modelling Group (CMG), and Theratechnologies (TH). These companies are all part of the "restaurants, hotels, motels" industry.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Hydro One?

Restaurant Brands International (TSE:QSR) and Hydro One (TSE:H) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and media sentiment.

Restaurant Brands International presently has a consensus price target of C$84.00, suggesting a potential downside of 19.88%. Hydro One has a consensus price target of C$57.09, suggesting a potential upside of 0.71%. Given Hydro One's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hydro One is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Restaurant Brands International	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Hydro One	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.11

67.5% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.0% of Hydro One shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 47.1% of Hydro One shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.387118, meaning that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hydro One has a beta of 0.349922, meaning that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International and Restaurant Brands International both had 1 articles in the media. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Hydro One's score of 0.00 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Restaurant Brands International	Positive
Hydro One	Neutral

Hydro One has a net margin of 14.78% compared to Restaurant Brands International's net margin of 9.96%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 27.13% beat Hydro One's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Restaurant Brands International	9.96%	27.13%	5.81%
Hydro One	14.78%	10.87%	3.57%

Hydro One has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Restaurant Brands International. Hydro One is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restaurant Brands International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International	C$9.59B	3.79	C$793.99M	C$2.83	37.05
Hydro One	C$9.28B	3.67	C$1.14B	C$2.28	24.86

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of C$2.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Hydro One pays an annual dividend of C$1.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 88.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hydro One pays out 58.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Hydro One on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Boyd Group Services?

Restaurant Brands International (TSE:QSR) and Boyd Group Services (TSE:BYD) are both consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 9.96% compared to Boyd Group Services' net margin of 0.40%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 27.13% beat Boyd Group Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Restaurant Brands International	9.96%	27.13%	5.81%
Boyd Group Services	0.40%	1.04%	3.95%

Restaurant Brands International has higher revenue and earnings than Boyd Group Services. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Boyd Group Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International	C$9.59B	3.79	C$793.99M	C$2.83	37.05
Boyd Group Services	C$3.36B	1.10	C$29.07M	C$0.66	201.80

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.387118, meaning that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Boyd Group Services has a beta of 0.99329, meaning that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus target price of C$84.00, indicating a potential downside of 19.88%. Boyd Group Services has a consensus target price of C$236.92, indicating a potential upside of 77.88%. Given Boyd Group Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Boyd Group Services is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Restaurant Brands International	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Boyd Group Services	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.08

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 1 more articles in the media than Boyd Group Services. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 0 mentions for Boyd Group Services. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Boyd Group Services' score of 0.00 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Restaurant Brands International	Positive
Boyd Group Services	Neutral

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of C$2.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Boyd Group Services pays an annual dividend of C$0.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 88.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Boyd Group Services pays out 67.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

67.5% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.4% of Boyd Group Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Boyd Group Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Boyd Group Services on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to MTY Food Group?

MTY Food Group (TSE:MTY) and Restaurant Brands International (TSE:QSR) are both consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

MTY Food Group has a beta of 1.012246, indicating that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.387118, indicating that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

MTY Food Group has a net margin of 13.14% compared to Restaurant Brands International's net margin of 9.96%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 27.13% beat MTY Food Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MTY Food Group	13.14%	18.59%	4.18%
Restaurant Brands International	9.96%	27.13%	5.81%

27.2% of MTY Food Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.5% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.5% of MTY Food Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Restaurant Brands International has higher revenue and earnings than MTY Food Group. MTY Food Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restaurant Brands International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MTY Food Group	C$1.17B	0.79	C$93.69M	C$6.73	6.00
Restaurant Brands International	C$9.59B	3.79	C$793.99M	C$2.83	37.05

MTY Food Group pays an annual dividend of C$1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of C$2.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. MTY Food Group pays out 20.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International pays out 88.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MTY Food Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

MTY Food Group currently has a consensus price target of C$46.00, indicating a potential upside of 13.83%. Restaurant Brands International has a consensus price target of C$84.00, indicating a potential downside of 19.88%. Given MTY Food Group's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe MTY Food Group is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MTY Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29
Restaurant Brands International	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

In the previous week, MTY Food Group and MTY Food Group both had 1 articles in the media. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat MTY Food Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
MTY Food Group	Neutral
Restaurant Brands International	Positive

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats MTY Food Group on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Computer Modelling Group?

Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) and Restaurant Brands International (TSE:QSR) are both restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

Computer Modelling Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of C$2.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Computer Modelling Group pays out 38.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International pays out 88.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Computer Modelling Group currently has a consensus price target of C$5.75, indicating a potential upside of 49.35%. Restaurant Brands International has a consensus price target of C$84.00, indicating a potential downside of 19.88%. Given Computer Modelling Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Computer Modelling Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Restaurant Brands International	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Restaurant Brands International has higher revenue and earnings than Computer Modelling Group. Computer Modelling Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restaurant Brands International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Computer Modelling Group	C$126.19M	2.38	C$23.95M	C$0.21	18.33
Restaurant Brands International	C$9.59B	3.79	C$793.99M	C$2.83	37.05

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 1 more articles in the media than Computer Modelling Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 0 mentions for Computer Modelling Group. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Computer Modelling Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Computer Modelling Group	Neutral
Restaurant Brands International	Positive

40.4% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.5% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.821827, indicating that its stock price is 182% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.387118, indicating that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 13.80% compared to Restaurant Brands International's net margin of 9.96%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 27.13% beat Computer Modelling Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Computer Modelling Group	13.80%	20.50%	12.79%
Restaurant Brands International	9.96%	27.13%	5.81%

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Computer Modelling Group on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Theratechnologies?

Theratechnologies (TSE:TH) and Restaurant Brands International (TSE:QSR) are both restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 1 more articles in the media than Theratechnologies. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 0 mentions for Theratechnologies. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Theratechnologies' score of 0.00 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Theratechnologies	Neutral
Restaurant Brands International	Positive

Restaurant Brands International has a consensus price target of C$84.00, indicating a potential downside of 19.88%. Given Restaurant Brands International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Theratechnologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Theratechnologies	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Restaurant Brands International	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Restaurant Brands International has higher revenue and earnings than Theratechnologies. Theratechnologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restaurant Brands International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Theratechnologies	C$84.38M	2.44	-C$1.96M	-C$0.19	N/A
Restaurant Brands International	C$9.59B	3.79	C$793.99M	C$2.83	37.05

0.5% of Theratechnologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.5% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Theratechnologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 9.96% compared to Theratechnologies' net margin of -11.81%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 27.13% beat Theratechnologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Theratechnologies	-11.81%	16.59%	5.15%
Restaurant Brands International	9.96%	27.13%	5.81%

Theratechnologies has a beta of 0.256166, indicating that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.387118, indicating that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Theratechnologies on 17 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Restaurant Brands International News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding QSR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

QSR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Restaurant Brands International	Restaurants Industry	Cyclical Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$36.38B	C$3.75B	C$4.25B	C$12.89B
Dividend Yield	3.47%	5.08%	3.51%	6.20%
P/E Ratio	37.05	9.59	76.17	37.12
Price / Sales	3.79	44.17	323.13	10.45
Price / Cash	28.72	41.64	30.81	82.29
Price / Book	6.89	2.25	3.34	4.47
Net Income	C$793.99M	C$89.93M	C$249.12M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	3.45%	1.79%	0.24%	0.89%
1 Month Performance	-0.06%	1.10%	0.93%	-1.07%
1 Year Performance	14.72%	-1.75%	0.53%	41.92%

Restaurant Brands International Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
QSR Restaurant Brands International	1.6348 of 5 stars	C$104.84 +1.6%	C$84.00 -19.9%	+14.7%	C$36.38B	C$9.59B	37.05	6,400	Positive News Dividend Announcement
H Hydro One	1.022 of 5 stars	C$56.21 +0.1%	C$57.09 +1.6%	+15.1%	C$33.73B	C$9.28B	24.65	50,000	News Coverage Negative News Dividend Increase
BYD Boyd Group Services	3.5195 of 5 stars	C$139.87 -0.6%	C$237.14 +69.5%	-35.9%	C$3.89B	C$3.36B	211.92	15,800
MTY MTY Food Group	3.3651 of 5 stars	C$39.74 +1.1%	C$46.00 +15.8%	+0.1%	C$907.70M	C$1.17B	5.90	7,326
CMG Computer Modelling Group	2.6543 of 5 stars	C$3.75 -1.1%	C$5.75 +53.3%	-43.9%	C$292.48M	C$126.19M	17.86	105,000	Dividend Announcement

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:QSR) was last updated on 6/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) Competitors

QSR vs. H, BYD, MTY, CMG, and TH

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Hydro One?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Boyd Group Services?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to MTY Food Group?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Computer Modelling Group?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Theratechnologies?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

QSR vs. The Competition

Restaurant Brands International Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) Competitors

QSR vs. H, BYD, MTY, CMG, and TH

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Hydro One?

Do analysts recommend QSR or H?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of QSR or H?

Which has more volatility & risk, QSR or H?

Does the media refer more to QSR or H?

Is QSR or H more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, QSR or H?

Is QSR or H a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Boyd Group Services?

Is QSR or BYD more profitable?

Which has better earnings and valuation, QSR or BYD?

Which has more volatility and risk, QSR or BYD?

Do analysts rate QSR or BYD?

Does the media refer more to QSR or BYD?

Is QSR or BYD a better dividend stock?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of QSR or BYD?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to MTY Food Group?

Which has more volatility & risk, MTY or QSR?

Is MTY or QSR more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in MTY or QSR?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, MTY or QSR?

Is MTY or QSR a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend MTY or QSR?

Does the media refer more to MTY or QSR?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Computer Modelling Group?

Is CMG or QSR a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend CMG or QSR?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, CMG or QSR?

Does the media favor CMG or QSR?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in CMG or QSR?

Which has more volatility and risk, CMG or QSR?

Is CMG or QSR more profitable?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Theratechnologies?

Does the media prefer TH or QSR?

Do analysts prefer TH or QSR?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, TH or QSR?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of TH or QSR?

Is TH or QSR more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, TH or QSR?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

QSR vs. The Competition

Restaurant Brands International Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools