Restaurant Brands International (QSR) Competitors

C$104.12 -0.87 (-0.83%)

As of 05/22/2026 04:30 PM Eastern

QSR vs. H, BYD, MTY, CMG, and MGM

Should you buy Restaurant Brands International stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Restaurant Brands International with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Restaurant Brands International include Hydro One (H), Boyd Group Services (BYD), MTY Food Group (MTY), Computer Modelling Group (CMG), and Maple Gold Mines (MGM). These companies are all part of the "restaurants, hotels, motels" industry.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Hydro One?

Hydro One (TSE:H) and Restaurant Brands International (TSE:QSR) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

22.7% of Hydro One shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.5% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. 47.1% of Hydro One shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hydro One has a net margin of 14.78% compared to Restaurant Brands International's net margin of 9.96%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 27.13% beat Hydro One's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hydro One	14.78%	10.87%	3.57%
Restaurant Brands International	9.96%	27.13%	5.81%

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 7 more articles in the media than Hydro One. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 4 mentions for Hydro One. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 0.27 beat Hydro One's score of 0.01 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hydro One	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Restaurant Brands International	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Hydro One pays an annual dividend of C$1.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of C$2.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Hydro One pays out 58.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International pays out 88.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Hydro One has a beta of 0.380968, indicating that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.26586, indicating that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

Hydro One currently has a consensus target price of C$56.64, indicating a potential downside of 4.28%. Restaurant Brands International has a consensus target price of C$84.00, indicating a potential downside of 19.32%. Given Hydro One's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Hydro One is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hydro One	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Restaurant Brands International	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Hydro One has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Restaurant Brands International. Hydro One is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restaurant Brands International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hydro One	C$9.28B	3.83	C$1.14B	C$2.28	25.95
Restaurant Brands International	C$9.59B	3.77	C$793.99M	C$2.83	36.79

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Hydro One on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Boyd Group Services?

Boyd Group Services (TSE:BYD) and Restaurant Brands International (TSE:QSR) are both consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

Boyd Group Services pays an annual dividend of C$0.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of C$2.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Boyd Group Services pays out 67.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International pays out 88.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

61.7% of Boyd Group Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.5% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Boyd Group Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Boyd Group Services has a beta of 0.751962, suggesting that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.26586, suggesting that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 11 more articles in the media than Boyd Group Services. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 0 mentions for Boyd Group Services. Boyd Group Services' average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of 0.27 indicating that Boyd Group Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Boyd Group Services	Neutral
Restaurant Brands International	Neutral

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 9.96% compared to Boyd Group Services' net margin of 0.40%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 27.13% beat Boyd Group Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Boyd Group Services	0.40%	1.04%	3.95%
Restaurant Brands International	9.96%	27.13%	5.81%

Restaurant Brands International has higher revenue and earnings than Boyd Group Services. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Boyd Group Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Boyd Group Services	C$3.36B	1.24	C$29.07M	C$0.66	227.09
Restaurant Brands International	C$9.59B	3.77	C$793.99M	C$2.83	36.79

Boyd Group Services presently has a consensus target price of C$237.14, suggesting a potential upside of 58.22%. Restaurant Brands International has a consensus target price of C$84.00, suggesting a potential downside of 19.32%. Given Boyd Group Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Boyd Group Services is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Boyd Group Services	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.07
Restaurant Brands International	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Boyd Group Services on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to MTY Food Group?

Restaurant Brands International (TSE:QSR) and MTY Food Group (TSE:MTY) are both consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk and analyst recommendations.

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of C$2.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. MTY Food Group pays an annual dividend of C$1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 88.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MTY Food Group pays out 20.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MTY Food Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.26586, indicating that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MTY Food Group has a beta of 0.900026, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus target price of C$84.00, indicating a potential downside of 19.32%. MTY Food Group has a consensus target price of C$46.00, indicating a potential upside of 18.68%. Given MTY Food Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe MTY Food Group is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Restaurant Brands International	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
MTY Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29

68.5% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.1% of MTY Food Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.5% of MTY Food Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 11 more articles in the media than MTY Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 0 mentions for MTY Food Group. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 0.27 beat MTY Food Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Restaurant Brands International	Neutral
MTY Food Group	Neutral

MTY Food Group has a net margin of 13.14% compared to Restaurant Brands International's net margin of 9.96%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 27.13% beat MTY Food Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Restaurant Brands International	9.96%	27.13%	5.81%
MTY Food Group	13.14%	18.59%	4.18%

Restaurant Brands International has higher revenue and earnings than MTY Food Group. MTY Food Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restaurant Brands International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International	C$9.59B	3.77	C$793.99M	C$2.83	36.79
MTY Food Group	C$1.17B	0.75	C$93.69M	C$6.73	5.76

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats MTY Food Group on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Computer Modelling Group?

Restaurant Brands International (TSE:QSR) and Computer Modelling Group (TSE:CMG) are both restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 7 more articles in the media than Computer Modelling Group. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 4 mentions for Computer Modelling Group. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 0.27 beat Computer Modelling Group's score of -0.13 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Restaurant Brands International	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Computer Modelling Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Restaurant Brands International has higher revenue and earnings than Computer Modelling Group. Computer Modelling Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restaurant Brands International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International	C$9.59B	3.77	C$793.99M	C$2.83	36.79
Computer Modelling Group	C$126.19M	2.49	C$23.95M	C$0.21	18.76

Computer Modelling Group has a net margin of 13.80% compared to Restaurant Brands International's net margin of 9.96%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 27.13% beat Computer Modelling Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Restaurant Brands International	9.96%	27.13%	5.81%
Computer Modelling Group	13.80%	20.50%	12.79%

68.5% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.5% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Computer Modelling Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of C$2.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Computer Modelling Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 88.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Computer Modelling Group pays out 38.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.26586, meaning that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Computer Modelling Group has a beta of -0.6734, meaning that its stock price is 167% less volatile than the broader market.

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus price target of C$84.00, indicating a potential downside of 19.32%. Computer Modelling Group has a consensus price target of C$5.85, indicating a potential upside of 48.48%. Given Computer Modelling Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Computer Modelling Group is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Restaurant Brands International	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Computer Modelling Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Computer Modelling Group on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Maple Gold Mines?

Restaurant Brands International (TSE:QSR) and Maple Gold Mines (CVE:MGM) are both restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and dividends.

Restaurant Brands International presently has a consensus price target of C$84.00, suggesting a potential downside of 19.32%. Given Restaurant Brands International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Maple Gold Mines.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Restaurant Brands International	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Maple Gold Mines	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of C$2.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Maple Gold Mines pays an annual dividend of C$0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.5%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 88.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Maple Gold Mines pays out -282.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Maple Gold Mines is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 11 more articles in the media than Maple Gold Mines. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 0 mentions for Maple Gold Mines. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 0.27 beat Maple Gold Mines' score of 0.00 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Restaurant Brands International	Neutral
Maple Gold Mines	Neutral

Restaurant Brands International has higher revenue and earnings than Maple Gold Mines. Maple Gold Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restaurant Brands International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International	C$9.59B	3.77	C$793.99M	C$2.83	36.79
Maple Gold Mines	N/A	N/A	-C$4.83M	-C$0.17	N/A

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 9.96% compared to Maple Gold Mines' net margin of 0.00%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 27.13% beat Maple Gold Mines' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Restaurant Brands International	9.96%	27.13%	5.81%
Maple Gold Mines	N/A	-105.68%	-45.61%

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.26586, indicating that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Maple Gold Mines has a beta of 2.241883, indicating that its stock price is 124% more volatile than the broader market.

68.5% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.4% of Maple Gold Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.1% of Maple Gold Mines shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Maple Gold Mines on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Restaurant Brands International News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding QSR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

QSR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Restaurant Brands International	Restaurants Industry	Cyclical Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$36.13B	C$3.67B	C$4.23B	C$12.15B
Dividend Yield	3.40%	5.26%	3.55%	6.21%
P/E Ratio	36.79	18.77	77.69	37.50
Price / Sales	3.77	43.79	326.20	11.49
Price / Cash	28.72	41.63	30.87	82.29
Price / Book	6.85	2.21	3.22	4.43
Net Income	C$793.99M	C$89.93M	C$247.50M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-0.22%	-0.09%	0.42%	0.39%
1 Month Performance	-5.86%	-2.37%	0.40%	0.51%
1 Year Performance	8.30%	-2.87%	2.12%	53.36%

Restaurant Brands International Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
QSR Restaurant Brands International	1.4079 of 5 stars	C$104.12 -0.8%	C$84.00 -19.3%	+8.3%	C$36.13B	C$9.59B	36.79	6,400	Analyst Revision
H Hydro One	1.66 of 5 stars	C$58.63 +1.8%	C$56.64 -3.4%	+17.0%	C$35.18B	C$9.28B	25.71	50,000
BYD Boyd Group Services	3.8641 of 5 stars	C$144.25 +1.7%	C$237.14 +64.4%	-28.5%	C$4.01B	C$3.36B	218.56	15,800	Gap Up
MTY MTY Food Group	3.6369 of 5 stars	C$37.27 -1.4%	C$46.00 +23.4%	-6.8%	C$851.28M	C$1.17B	5.54	7,326
CMG Computer Modelling Group	3.0422 of 5 stars	C$3.85 +3.8%	C$6.05 +57.1%	-43.6%	C$306.84M	C$126.20M	19.25	105,000	News Coverage Earnings Report Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:QSR) was last updated on 5/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) Competitors

QSR vs. H, BYD, MTY, CMG, and MGM

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Hydro One?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Boyd Group Services?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to MTY Food Group?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Computer Modelling Group?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Maple Gold Mines?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

QSR vs. The Competition

Restaurant Brands International Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) Competitors

QSR vs. H, BYD, MTY, CMG, and MGM

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Hydro One?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of H or QSR?

Is H or QSR more profitable?

Does the media favor H or QSR?

Is H or QSR a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, H or QSR?

Do analysts recommend H or QSR?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, H or QSR?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Boyd Group Services?

Is BYD or QSR a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in BYD or QSR?

Which has more risk & volatility, BYD or QSR?

Does the media prefer BYD or QSR?

Is BYD or QSR more profitable?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, BYD or QSR?

Do analysts rate BYD or QSR?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to MTY Food Group?

Is QSR or MTY a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility and risk, QSR or MTY?

Do analysts rate QSR or MTY?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in QSR or MTY?

Does the media prefer QSR or MTY?

Is QSR or MTY more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, QSR or MTY?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Computer Modelling Group?

Does the media favor QSR or CMG?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, QSR or CMG?

Is QSR or CMG more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in QSR or CMG?

Is QSR or CMG a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility and risk, QSR or CMG?

Do analysts rate QSR or CMG?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Maple Gold Mines?

Do analysts prefer QSR or MGM?

Is QSR or MGM a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer QSR or MGM?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, QSR or MGM?

Is QSR or MGM more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, QSR or MGM?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of QSR or MGM?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

QSR vs. The Competition

Restaurant Brands International Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools