Do analysts recommend GSV or S?

Sherritt International has a consensus price target of C$0.30, suggesting a potential upside of 71.43%. Given Sherritt International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Sherritt International is more favorable than Gold Standard Ventures. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Gold Standard Ventures 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Sherritt International 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, GSV or S?

Gold Standard Ventures has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sherritt International. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Gold Standard Ventures N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Sherritt International C$188.50M 0.65 -C$130.60M -C$0.21 N/A

Does the media favor GSV or S?

In the previous week, Gold Standard Ventures and Gold Standard Ventures both had 1 articles in the media. Gold Standard Ventures' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Sherritt International's score of -0.70 indicating that Gold Standard Ventures is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Gold Standard Ventures 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Sherritt International 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Negative

Do analysts prefer ML or S?

Sherritt International has a consensus price target of C$0.30, indicating a potential upside of 71.43%. Given Sherritt International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Sherritt International is more favorable than Millennial Lithium. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Millennial Lithium 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Sherritt International 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Do analysts prefer TI or S?

Sherritt International has a consensus target price of C$0.30, suggesting a potential upside of 71.43%. Given Sherritt International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Sherritt International is more favorable than Titan Mining. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Titan Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Sherritt International 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Sherritt International (S) Competitors

C$0.18 -0.01 (-5.41%)

As of 10:10 AM Eastern

Compare

S vs. GSV, AMC, NOA, ML, and TI

Should you buy Sherritt International stock or one of its competitors? Sherritt International's main competitors and comparable companies include Gold Standard Ventures (GSV), Arizona Metals (AMC), North American Construction Group (NOA), Millennial Lithium (ML), and Titan Mining (TI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "diversified metals & mining" industry.

How does Sherritt International compare to Gold Standard Ventures?

Gold Standard Ventures (CVE:GSV) and Sherritt International (TSE:S) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Gold Standard Ventures has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sherritt International.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gold Standard Ventures	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Sherritt International	C$188.50M	0.65	-C$130.60M	-C$0.21	N/A

Sherritt International has a consensus price target of C$0.30, suggesting a potential upside of 71.43%. Given Sherritt International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Sherritt International is more favorable than Gold Standard Ventures.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gold Standard Ventures	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Sherritt International	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Gold Standard Ventures has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Sherritt International's net margin of -86.00%. Gold Standard Ventures' return on equity of 0.00% beat Sherritt International's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gold Standard Ventures	N/A	N/A	N/A
Sherritt International	-86.00%	-20.46%	-2.60%

1.6% of Sherritt International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Sherritt International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Gold Standard Ventures and Gold Standard Ventures both had 1 articles in the media. Gold Standard Ventures' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Sherritt International's score of -0.70 indicating that Gold Standard Ventures is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Gold Standard Ventures	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Sherritt International	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative

Summary

Sherritt International beats Gold Standard Ventures on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sherritt International compare to Arizona Metals?

Arizona Metals (CVE:AMC) and Sherritt International (TSE:S) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Arizona Metals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sherritt International. Arizona Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sherritt International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Arizona Metals	N/A	N/A	N/A	-C$0.24	N/A
Sherritt International	C$188.50M	0.65	-C$130.60M	-C$0.21	N/A

1.6% of Sherritt International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Sherritt International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Arizona Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Sherritt International's net margin of -86.00%. Arizona Metals' return on equity of 0.00% beat Sherritt International's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Arizona Metals	N/A	N/A	N/A
Sherritt International	-86.00%	-20.46%	-2.60%

Arizona Metals presently has a consensus target price of C$1.25, suggesting a potential downside of 68.67%. Sherritt International has a consensus target price of C$0.30, suggesting a potential upside of 71.43%. Given Sherritt International's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Sherritt International is more favorable than Arizona Metals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Arizona Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Sherritt International	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, Sherritt International had 1 more articles in the media than Arizona Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Sherritt International and 0 mentions for Arizona Metals. Arizona Metals' average media sentiment score of -0.55 beat Sherritt International's score of -0.70 indicating that Arizona Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Arizona Metals	Negative
Sherritt International	Negative

Summary

Sherritt International beats Arizona Metals on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sherritt International compare to North American Construction Group?

North American Construction Group (TSE:NOA) and Sherritt International (TSE:S) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Sherritt International. North American Construction Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sherritt International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
North American Construction Group	C$1.44B	0.25	C$56.80M	-C$0.33	N/A
Sherritt International	C$188.50M	0.65	-C$130.60M	-C$0.21	N/A

North American Construction Group presently has a consensus target price of C$22.64, suggesting a potential upside of 70.12%. Sherritt International has a consensus target price of C$0.30, suggesting a potential upside of 71.43%. Given Sherritt International's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Sherritt International is more favorable than North American Construction Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
North American Construction Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86
Sherritt International	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

North American Construction Group has a net margin of -0.63% compared to Sherritt International's net margin of -86.00%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of -1.96% beat Sherritt International's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
North American Construction Group	-0.63%	-1.96%	6.65%
Sherritt International	-86.00%	-20.46%	-2.60%

23.0% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of Sherritt International shares are held by institutional investors. 8.9% of North American Construction Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Sherritt International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, North American Construction Group had 2 more articles in the media than Sherritt International. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for North American Construction Group and 1 mentions for Sherritt International. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 0.24 beat Sherritt International's score of -0.70 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
North American Construction Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Sherritt International	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative

North American Construction Group has a beta of 0.865511, meaning that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sherritt International has a beta of -0.704793, meaning that its stock price is 170% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Sherritt International on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sherritt International compare to Millennial Lithium?

Millennial Lithium (CVE:ML) and Sherritt International (TSE:S) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability and valuation.

Sherritt International has a consensus price target of C$0.30, indicating a potential upside of 71.43%. Given Sherritt International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Sherritt International is more favorable than Millennial Lithium.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Millennial Lithium	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Sherritt International	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Millennial Lithium has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sherritt International. Millennial Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sherritt International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Millennial Lithium	N/A	N/A	N/A	-C$0.20	N/A
Sherritt International	C$188.50M	0.65	-C$130.60M	-C$0.21	N/A

Millennial Lithium has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Sherritt International's net margin of -86.00%. Millennial Lithium's return on equity of 0.00% beat Sherritt International's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Millennial Lithium	N/A	N/A	N/A
Sherritt International	-86.00%	-20.46%	-2.60%

In the previous week, Sherritt International had 1 more articles in the media than Millennial Lithium. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Sherritt International and 0 mentions for Millennial Lithium. Millennial Lithium's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Sherritt International's score of -0.70 indicating that Millennial Lithium is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Millennial Lithium	Neutral
Sherritt International	Negative

1.6% of Sherritt International shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Sherritt International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Sherritt International beats Millennial Lithium on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sherritt International compare to Titan Mining?

Titan Mining (TSE:TI) and Sherritt International (TSE:S) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Titan Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sherritt International. Titan Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sherritt International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Titan Mining	C$87.18M	3.00	-C$8.33M	-C$0.09	N/A
Sherritt International	C$188.50M	0.65	-C$130.60M	-C$0.21	N/A

Titan Mining has a net margin of -10.58% compared to Sherritt International's net margin of -86.00%. Sherritt International's return on equity of -20.46% beat Titan Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Titan Mining	-10.58%	-67.15%	-3.50%
Sherritt International	-86.00%	-20.46%	-2.60%

In the previous week, Titan Mining and Titan Mining both had 1 articles in the media. Titan Mining's average media sentiment score of -0.47 beat Sherritt International's score of -0.70 indicating that Titan Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Titan Mining	Neutral
Sherritt International	Negative

Sherritt International has a consensus target price of C$0.30, suggesting a potential upside of 71.43%. Given Sherritt International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Sherritt International is more favorable than Titan Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Titan Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Sherritt International	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Titan Mining has a beta of -1.096639, meaning that its share price is 210% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sherritt International has a beta of -0.704793, meaning that its share price is 170% less volatile than the broader market.

3.1% of Titan Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of Sherritt International shares are held by institutional investors. 57.3% of Titan Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Sherritt International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Titan Mining and Sherritt International tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Sherritt International News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

S vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Sherritt International	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$123.19M	C$3.54B	C$4.63B	C$12.99B
Dividend Yield	3.31%	5.00%	4.30%	4.73%
P/E Ratio	-0.83	27.96	28.05	30.41
Price / Sales	0.65	8.69	5.80	3.88
Price / Cash	1.50	22.88	20.89	34.92
Price / Book	0.12	4.45	4.10	3.52
Net Income	-C$130.60M	C$127.64M	C$159.56M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	N/A	-1.45%	-1.09%	0.07%
1 Month Performance	-33.96%	-7.89%	-6.01%	-2.28%
1 Year Performance	40.00%	8.43%	7.96%	14.41%

Sherritt International Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
S Sherritt International	2.1991 of 5 stars	C$0.18 -5.4%	C$0.30 +71.4%	+40.0%	C$123.19M	C$188.50M	N/A	1,200	Gap Up
GSV Gold Standard Ventures	N/A	C$2.02 +1.3%	N/A	+0.0%	C$470.26M	N/A	N/A	20
AMC Arizona Metals	N/A	C$3.99 +3.1%	C$1.25 -68.7%	+0.0%	C$446.17M	N/A	N/A	33,700
NOA North American Construction Group	3.2338 of 5 stars	C$16.00 -3.8%	C$22.64 +41.5%	-34.0%	C$430.62M	C$1.34B	14.29	693	Dividend Announcement High Trading Volume
ML Millennial Lithium	N/A	C$4.04 +2.0%	N/A	+0.0%	C$395.36M	N/A	N/A	560	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:S) was last updated on 11/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Sherritt International (S) Competitors

S vs. GSV, AMC, NOA, ML, and TI

How does Sherritt International compare to Gold Standard Ventures?

Summary

How does Sherritt International compare to Arizona Metals?

Summary

How does Sherritt International compare to North American Construction Group?

Summary

How does Sherritt International compare to Millennial Lithium?

Summary

How does Sherritt International compare to Titan Mining?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

S vs. The Competition

Sherritt International Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Sherritt International (S) Competitors

S vs. GSV, AMC, NOA, ML, and TI

How does Sherritt International compare to Gold Standard Ventures?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, GSV or S?

Do analysts recommend GSV or S?

Is GSV or S more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in GSV or S?

Does the media favor GSV or S?

Summary

How does Sherritt International compare to Arizona Metals?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, AMC or S?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in AMC or S?

Is AMC or S more profitable?

Do analysts recommend AMC or S?

Does the media favor AMC or S?

Summary

How does Sherritt International compare to North American Construction Group?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, NOA or S?

Do analysts prefer NOA or S?

Is NOA or S more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of NOA or S?

Does the media prefer NOA or S?

Which has more risk & volatility, NOA or S?

Summary

How does Sherritt International compare to Millennial Lithium?

Do analysts prefer ML or S?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, ML or S?

Is ML or S more profitable?

Does the media refer more to ML or S?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in ML or S?

Summary

How does Sherritt International compare to Titan Mining?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, TI or S?

Is TI or S more profitable?

Does the media prefer TI or S?

Do analysts prefer TI or S?

Which has more volatility and risk, TI or S?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of TI or S?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

S vs. The Competition

Sherritt International Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools