Do analysts rate TRI or Y?

Thomson Reuters presently has a consensus price target of C$162.33, suggesting a potential upside of 20.92%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than Yellow Pages. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Thomson Reuters 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 6 Buy rating(s) 4 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.17 Yellow Pages 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has better earnings and valuation, TRI or Y?

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than Yellow Pages. Yellow Pages is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thomson Reuters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Thomson Reuters C$7.66B 7.65 C$1.47B C$3.45 38.88 Yellow Pages C$194.90M 0.77 C$34.99M C$1.26 10.37

Do analysts rate YMI or TRI?

Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of C$162.33, indicating a potential upside of 20.92%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than Yellow Pages. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Yellow Pages 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Thomson Reuters 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 6 Buy rating(s) 4 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.17

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, YMI or TRI?

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than Yellow Pages. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Yellow Pages N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Thomson Reuters C$7.66B 7.65 C$1.47B C$3.45 38.88

Do analysts prefer TRI or NWS?

Thomson Reuters currently has a consensus price target of C$162.33, indicating a potential upside of 20.92%. Given Thomson Reuters' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than NorthWest Copper. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Thomson Reuters 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 6 Buy rating(s) 4 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.17 NorthWest Copper 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 4.00

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, TRI or NWS?

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than NorthWest Copper. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Thomson Reuters C$7.66B 7.65 C$1.47B C$3.45 38.88 NorthWest Copper N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Does the media refer more to TRI or NWS?

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 3 more articles in the media than NorthWest Copper. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 2 mentions for NorthWest Copper. NorthWest Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Thomson Reuters' score of -0.34 indicating that NorthWest Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Thomson Reuters 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral NorthWest Copper 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better earnings and valuation, TRI or RBA?

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than RB Global. Thomson Reuters is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RB Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Thomson Reuters C$7.66B 7.65 C$1.47B C$3.45 38.88 RB Global C$4.72B 6.14 C$206.01M C$2.15 72.32

Which has better earnings and valuation, CGY or TRI?

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than Calian Group. Calian Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thomson Reuters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Calian Group C$832.10M 1.08 C$11.21M C$2.85 27.54 Thomson Reuters C$7.66B 7.65 C$1.47B C$3.45 38.88

Does the media refer more to CGY or TRI?

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 4 more articles in the media than Calian Group. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 1 mentions for Calian Group. Calian Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Thomson Reuters' score of -0.34 indicating that Calian Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Calian Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Thomson Reuters 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Thomson Reuters (TRI) Competitors

C$134.25 -0.43 (-0.32%)

As of 07/20/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

TRI vs. Y, YMI, NWS, RBA, and CGY

Should you buy Thomson Reuters stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Thomson Reuters with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Thomson Reuters include Yellow Pages (Y), Yellow Pages (YMI), NorthWest Copper (NWS), RB Global (RBA), and Calian Group (CGY).

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Yellow Pages?

Thomson Reuters (TSE:TRI) and Yellow Pages (TSE:Y) are both printing and publishing companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.06216, indicating that its share price is 94% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Yellow Pages has a beta of 0.956482, indicating that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 5 more articles in the media than Yellow Pages. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 0 mentions for Yellow Pages. Yellow Pages' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Thomson Reuters' score of -0.34 indicating that Yellow Pages is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Thomson Reuters	Neutral
Yellow Pages	Neutral

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.93% compared to Yellow Pages' net margin of 8.84%. Yellow Pages' return on equity of 33.37% beat Thomson Reuters' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Thomson Reuters	19.93%	12.70%	6.15%
Yellow Pages	8.84%	33.37%	15.88%

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than Yellow Pages. Yellow Pages is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thomson Reuters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Thomson Reuters	C$7.66B	7.65	C$1.47B	C$3.45	38.88
Yellow Pages	C$194.90M	0.77	C$34.99M	C$1.26	10.37

Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of C$2.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Yellow Pages pays an annual dividend of C$1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.7%. Thomson Reuters pays out 71.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Yellow Pages pays out 79.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Thomson Reuters presently has a consensus price target of C$162.33, suggesting a potential upside of 20.92%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than Yellow Pages.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Thomson Reuters	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	4 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.17
Yellow Pages	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

16.8% of Thomson Reuters shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.1% of Yellow Pages shares are owned by institutional investors. 69.8% of Thomson Reuters shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Yellow Pages shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats Yellow Pages on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Yellow Pages?

Yellow Pages (TSE:YMI) and Thomson Reuters (TSE:TRI) are both printing and publishing companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, risk, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Yellow Pages	Neutral
Thomson Reuters	Neutral

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.93% compared to Yellow Pages' net margin of 0.00%. Thomson Reuters' return on equity of 12.70% beat Yellow Pages' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Yellow Pages	N/A	N/A	N/A
Thomson Reuters	19.93%	12.70%	6.15%

16.8% of Thomson Reuters shares are owned by institutional investors. 69.8% of Thomson Reuters shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than Yellow Pages.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Yellow Pages	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Thomson Reuters	C$7.66B	7.65	C$1.47B	C$3.45	38.88

Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of C$162.33, indicating a potential upside of 20.92%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than Yellow Pages.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Yellow Pages	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Thomson Reuters	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	4 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.17

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats Yellow Pages on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to NorthWest Copper?

Thomson Reuters (TSE:TRI) and NorthWest Copper (CVE:NWS) are both printing and publishing companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and media sentiment.

Thomson Reuters currently has a consensus price target of C$162.33, indicating a potential upside of 20.92%. Given Thomson Reuters' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than NorthWest Copper.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Thomson Reuters	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	4 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.17
NorthWest Copper	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than NorthWest Copper.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Thomson Reuters	C$7.66B	7.65	C$1.47B	C$3.45	38.88
NorthWest Copper	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 3 more articles in the media than NorthWest Copper. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 2 mentions for NorthWest Copper. NorthWest Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Thomson Reuters' score of -0.34 indicating that NorthWest Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Thomson Reuters	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
NorthWest Copper	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.93% compared to NorthWest Copper's net margin of 0.00%. Thomson Reuters' return on equity of 12.70% beat NorthWest Copper's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Thomson Reuters	19.93%	12.70%	6.15%
NorthWest Copper	N/A	N/A	N/A

16.8% of Thomson Reuters shares are owned by institutional investors. 69.8% of Thomson Reuters shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats NorthWest Copper on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to RB Global?

Thomson Reuters (TSE:TRI) and RB Global (TSE:RBA) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.06216, indicating that its stock price is 94% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RB Global has a beta of 0.049534, indicating that its stock price is 95% less volatile than the broader market.

Thomson Reuters currently has a consensus price target of C$162.33, indicating a potential upside of 20.92%. RB Global has a consensus price target of C$134.50, indicating a potential downside of 13.49%. Given Thomson Reuters' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than RB Global.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Thomson Reuters	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	4 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.17
RB Global	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.25

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than RB Global. Thomson Reuters is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RB Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Thomson Reuters	C$7.66B	7.65	C$1.47B	C$3.45	38.88
RB Global	C$4.72B	6.14	C$206.01M	C$2.15	72.32

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 5 more articles in the media than RB Global. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 0 mentions for RB Global. RB Global's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Thomson Reuters' score of -0.34 indicating that RB Global is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Thomson Reuters	Neutral
RB Global	Neutral

Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of C$2.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. RB Global pays an annual dividend of C$1.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Thomson Reuters pays out 71.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. RB Global pays out 56.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.93% compared to RB Global's net margin of 9.53%. Thomson Reuters' return on equity of 12.70% beat RB Global's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Thomson Reuters	19.93%	12.70%	6.15%
RB Global	9.53%	7.47%	4.03%

16.8% of Thomson Reuters shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.1% of RB Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 69.8% of Thomson Reuters shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of RB Global shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats RB Global on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Calian Group?

Calian Group (TSE:CGY) and Thomson Reuters (TSE:TRI) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and risk.

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 4 more articles in the media than Calian Group. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 1 mentions for Calian Group. Calian Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Thomson Reuters' score of -0.34 indicating that Calian Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Calian Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Thomson Reuters	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than Calian Group. Calian Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thomson Reuters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Calian Group	C$832.10M	1.08	C$11.21M	C$2.85	27.54
Thomson Reuters	C$7.66B	7.65	C$1.47B	C$3.45	38.88

Calian Group has a beta of 0.970192, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.06216, meaning that its stock price is 94% less volatile than the broader market.

Calian Group pays an annual dividend of C$1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of C$2.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Calian Group pays out 39.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Thomson Reuters pays out 71.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.93% compared to Calian Group's net margin of 3.97%. Thomson Reuters' return on equity of 12.70% beat Calian Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Calian Group	3.97%	10.35%	5.35%
Thomson Reuters	19.93%	12.70%	6.15%

Calian Group currently has a consensus target price of C$92.06, indicating a potential upside of 17.27%. Thomson Reuters has a consensus target price of C$162.33, indicating a potential upside of 20.92%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than Calian Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Calian Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Thomson Reuters	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	4 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.17

34.8% of Calian Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.8% of Thomson Reuters shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Calian Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 69.8% of Thomson Reuters shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats Calian Group on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Thomson Reuters News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TRI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

TRI vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Thomson Reuters	Specialty Business Services Industry	Industrials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$58.61B	C$5.31B	C$9.36B	C$12.22B
Dividend Yield	2.71%	4.84%	3.51%	6.18%
P/E Ratio	38.88	27.19	26.79	36.20
Price / Sales	7.65	89.82	1,975.39	9.24
Price / Cash	90.25	40.54	27.26	82.29
Price / Book	4.97	7.17	4.40	4.38
Net Income	C$1.47B	C$144.67M	C$792.80M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	4.07%	1.24%	-0.07%	-1.15%
1 Month Performance	17.81%	3.55%	0.52%	-1.45%
1 Year Performance	-51.76%	2.95%	14.19%	29.50%

Thomson Reuters Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
TRI Thomson Reuters	3.1265 of 5 stars	C$134.25 -0.3%	C$162.33 +20.9%	-53.2%	C$58.61B	C$7.66B	38.88	24,400
Y Yellow Pages	N/A	C$12.85 -0.1%	N/A	+16.2%	C$148.17M	C$194.90M	10.20	627	Gap Up
YMI Yellow Pages	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$11.14M	N/A	N/A	147,000
NWS NorthWest Copper	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$0.00	N/A	N/A	25,500	High Trading Volume
RBA RB Global	N/A	C$153.59 -0.3%	C$134.50 -12.4%	+3.0%	C$28.61B	C$4.72B	71.44	4,200

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:TRI) was last updated on 7/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thomson Reuters (TRI) Competitors

TRI vs. Y, YMI, NWS, RBA, and CGY

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Yellow Pages?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Yellow Pages?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to NorthWest Copper?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to RB Global?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Calian Group?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TRI vs. The Competition

Thomson Reuters Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Thomson Reuters (TRI) Competitors

TRI vs. Y, YMI, NWS, RBA, and CGY

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Yellow Pages?

Which has more volatility and risk, TRI or Y?

Does the media refer more to TRI or Y?

Is TRI or Y more profitable?

Which has better earnings and valuation, TRI or Y?

Is TRI or Y a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate TRI or Y?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of TRI or Y?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Yellow Pages?

Does the media refer more to YMI or TRI?

Is YMI or TRI more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in YMI or TRI?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, YMI or TRI?

Do analysts rate YMI or TRI?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to NorthWest Copper?

Do analysts prefer TRI or NWS?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, TRI or NWS?

Does the media refer more to TRI or NWS?

Is TRI or NWS more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in TRI or NWS?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to RB Global?

Which has more volatility & risk, TRI or RBA?

Do analysts rate TRI or RBA?

Which has better earnings and valuation, TRI or RBA?

Does the media favor TRI or RBA?

Is TRI or RBA a better dividend stock?

Is TRI or RBA more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of TRI or RBA?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Calian Group?

Does the media refer more to CGY or TRI?

Which has better earnings and valuation, CGY or TRI?

Which has more risk and volatility, CGY or TRI?

Is CGY or TRI a better dividend stock?

Is CGY or TRI more profitable?

Do analysts recommend CGY or TRI?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in CGY or TRI?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TRI vs. The Competition

Thomson Reuters Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools