Free Trial
Your $100 Credit Is Waiting! Get MarketBeat All Access Today
Lock In $149
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Thomson Reuters (TRI) Competitors

Thomson Reuters logo
C$120.24 +6.18 (+5.42%)
As of 05/19/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

TRI vs. Y, YMI, NWS, RBA, and GDI

Should you buy Thomson Reuters stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Thomson Reuters with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Thomson Reuters include Yellow Pages (Y), Yellow Pages (YMI), NorthWest Copper (NWS), RB Global (RBA), and GDI Integrated Facility Services (GDI).

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Yellow Pages?

Thomson Reuters (TSE:TRI) and Yellow Pages (TSE:Y) are both printing and publishing companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.11185, indicating that its share price is 89% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Yellow Pages has a beta of 0.959358, indicating that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than Yellow Pages. Yellow Pages is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thomson Reuters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thomson ReutersC$7.66B6.85C$1.47BC$3.4534.82
Yellow PagesC$194.90M0.89C$34.99MC$1.2610.20

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters and Thomson Reuters both had 3 articles in the media. Yellow Pages' average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Thomson Reuters' score of -0.47 indicating that Yellow Pages is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Thomson Reuters
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Yellow Pages
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

16.0% of Thomson Reuters shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.9% of Yellow Pages shares are owned by institutional investors. 69.8% of Thomson Reuters shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Yellow Pages shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.83% compared to Yellow Pages' net margin of 8.84%. Yellow Pages' return on equity of 33.37% beat Thomson Reuters' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thomson Reuters19.83% 12.64% 6.15%
Yellow Pages 8.84%33.37%15.88%

Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of C$2.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Yellow Pages pays an annual dividend of C$1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. Thomson Reuters pays out 71.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Yellow Pages pays out 79.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Thomson Reuters presently has a consensus price target of C$163.00, suggesting a potential upside of 35.56%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than Yellow Pages.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Thomson Reuters
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
4 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.17
Yellow Pages
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats Yellow Pages on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Yellow Pages?

Thomson Reuters (TSE:TRI) and Yellow Pages (TSE:YMI) are both printing and publishing companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 3 more articles in the media than Yellow Pages. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 0 mentions for Yellow Pages. Yellow Pages' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Thomson Reuters' score of -0.47 indicating that Yellow Pages is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thomson Reuters Neutral
Yellow Pages Neutral

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than Yellow Pages.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thomson ReutersC$7.66B6.85C$1.47BC$3.4534.82
Yellow PagesN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

16.0% of Thomson Reuters shares are owned by institutional investors. 69.8% of Thomson Reuters shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.83% compared to Yellow Pages' net margin of 0.00%. Thomson Reuters' return on equity of 12.64% beat Yellow Pages' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thomson Reuters19.83% 12.64% 6.15%
Yellow Pages N/A N/A N/A

Thomson Reuters presently has a consensus price target of C$163.00, indicating a potential upside of 35.56%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than Yellow Pages.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Thomson Reuters
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
4 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.17
Yellow Pages
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats Yellow Pages on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to NorthWest Copper?

NorthWest Copper (CVE:NWS) and Thomson Reuters (TSE:TRI) are both printing and publishing companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.83% compared to NorthWest Copper's net margin of 0.00%. Thomson Reuters' return on equity of 12.64% beat NorthWest Copper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NorthWest CopperN/A N/A N/A
Thomson Reuters 19.83%12.64%6.15%

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than NorthWest Copper.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NorthWest CopperN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Thomson ReutersC$7.66B6.85C$1.47BC$3.4534.82

Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of C$163.00, suggesting a potential upside of 35.56%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than NorthWest Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NorthWest Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Thomson Reuters
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
4 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.17

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 3 more articles in the media than NorthWest Copper. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 0 mentions for NorthWest Copper. Thomson Reuters' average media sentiment score of -0.47 beat NorthWest Copper's score of -1.47 indicating that Thomson Reuters is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
NorthWest Copper Negative
Thomson Reuters Neutral

16.0% of Thomson Reuters shares are held by institutional investors. 69.8% of Thomson Reuters shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats NorthWest Copper on 12 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to RB Global?

RB Global (TSE:RBA) and Thomson Reuters (TSE:TRI) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and earnings.

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.83% compared to RB Global's net margin of 9.53%. Thomson Reuters' return on equity of 12.64% beat RB Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RB Global9.53% 7.47% 4.03%
Thomson Reuters 19.83%12.64%6.15%

80.8% of RB Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.0% of Thomson Reuters shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of RB Global shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 69.8% of Thomson Reuters shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

RB Global currently has a consensus price target of C$124.00, indicating a potential downside of 12.67%. Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of C$163.00, indicating a potential upside of 35.56%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than RB Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
RB Global
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Thomson Reuters
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
4 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.17

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 3 more articles in the media than RB Global. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 0 mentions for RB Global. RB Global's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Thomson Reuters' score of -0.47 indicating that RB Global is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
RB Global Neutral
Thomson Reuters Neutral

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than RB Global. Thomson Reuters is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RB Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RB GlobalC$4.72B5.61C$206.01MC$2.1566.04
Thomson ReutersC$7.66B6.85C$1.47BC$3.4534.82

RB Global pays an annual dividend of C$1.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of C$2.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. RB Global pays out 56.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Thomson Reuters pays out 71.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

RB Global has a beta of 0.271126, suggesting that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.11185, suggesting that its share price is 89% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats RB Global on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to GDI Integrated Facility Services?

GDI Integrated Facility Services (TSE:GDI) and Thomson Reuters (TSE:TRI) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.83% compared to GDI Integrated Facility Services' net margin of 1.70%. Thomson Reuters' return on equity of 12.64% beat GDI Integrated Facility Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GDI Integrated Facility Services1.70% 8.36% 2.26%
Thomson Reuters 19.83%12.64%6.15%

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than GDI Integrated Facility Services. GDI Integrated Facility Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thomson Reuters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GDI Integrated Facility ServicesC$2.47B0.35C$15.23MC$1.7920.43
Thomson ReutersC$7.66B6.85C$1.47BC$3.4534.82

GDI Integrated Facility Services has a beta of 0.098917, suggesting that its share price is 90% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.11185, suggesting that its share price is 89% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 3 more articles in the media than GDI Integrated Facility Services. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 0 mentions for GDI Integrated Facility Services. GDI Integrated Facility Services' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Thomson Reuters' score of -0.47 indicating that GDI Integrated Facility Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
GDI Integrated Facility Services Neutral
Thomson Reuters Neutral

GDI Integrated Facility Services currently has a consensus price target of C$34.15, suggesting a potential downside of 6.62%. Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of C$163.00, suggesting a potential upside of 35.56%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than GDI Integrated Facility Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
GDI Integrated Facility Services
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Thomson Reuters
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
4 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.17

16.0% of GDI Integrated Facility Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.0% of Thomson Reuters shares are held by institutional investors. 12.6% of GDI Integrated Facility Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 69.8% of Thomson Reuters shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats GDI Integrated Facility Services on 16 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Thomson Reuters News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TRI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TRI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TRI vs. The Competition

MetricThomson ReutersSpecialty Business Services IndustryIndustrials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$52.49BC$5.13BC$9.20BC$11.80B
Dividend Yield3.13%4.77%3.59%6.23%
P/E Ratio34.8226.7024.9037.14
Price / Sales6.8587.344,167.3611.26
Price / Cash90.2540.5427.4682.29
Price / Book4.457.474.804.35
Net IncomeC$1.47BC$144.67MC$794.35MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance6.77%1.18%-1.53%-2.01%
1 Month Performance-7.28%1.97%-0.24%-1.15%
1 Year Performance-55.92%4.29%32.91%51.32%

Thomson Reuters Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TRI
Thomson Reuters
3.3693 of 5 stars
C$120.24
+5.4%
C$163.00
+35.6%
-55.1%C$52.49BC$7.66B34.8224,400
Y
Yellow Pages
N/AC$13.30
+1.1%
N/A+14.8%C$180.47MC$198.88M10.15627
YMI
Yellow Pages
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$11.14MN/AN/A147,000
NWS
NorthWest Copper
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$0.00N/AN/A25,500
RBA
RB Global
0.4379 of 5 stars
C$141.57
-0.9%
C$124.00
-12.4%
-6.2%C$26.37BC$4.72B65.854,200

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:TRI) was last updated on 5/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners