Go Pro

RB Global (RBA) Competitors

RB Global logo
C$114.73 -0.05 (-0.04%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

RBA vs. EFN, BYD, BDI, KBL, and WCN

Should you buy RB Global stock or one of its competitors? RB Global's main competitors and comparable companies include Element Fleet Management (EFN), Boyd Group Services (BYD), Black Diamond Group (BDI), K-Bro Linen (KBL), and Waste Connections (WCN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "commercial services & supplies" industry.

How does RB Global compare to Element Fleet Management?

RB Global (TSE:RBA) and Element Fleet Management (TSE:EFN) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

RB Global pays an annual dividend of C$1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Element Fleet Management pays an annual dividend of C$0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. RB Global pays out 53.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Element Fleet Management pays out 54.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

81.8% of RB Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.9% of Element Fleet Management shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of RB Global shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Element Fleet Management shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Element Fleet Management has a net margin of 12.17% compared to RB Global's net margin of 9.97%. Element Fleet Management's return on equity of 10.57% beat RB Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RB Global9.97% 8.00% 4.03%
Element Fleet Management 12.17%10.57%2.97%

Element Fleet Management has lower revenue, but higher earnings than RB Global. Element Fleet Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RB Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RB GlobalC$4.85B4.38C$206.01MC$2.3249.45
Element Fleet ManagementC$2.45B4.20C$244.93MC$0.7435.58

In the previous week, Element Fleet Management had 3 more articles in the media than RB Global. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Element Fleet Management and 0 mentions for RB Global. RB Global's average media sentiment score of 1.88 beat Element Fleet Management's score of 0.27 indicating that RB Global is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
RB Global Very Positive
Element Fleet Management Neutral

RB Global currently has a consensus price target of C$134.50, suggesting a potential upside of 17.23%. Element Fleet Management has a consensus price target of C$42.14, suggesting a potential upside of 60.06%. Given Element Fleet Management's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Element Fleet Management is more favorable than RB Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
RB Global
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25
Element Fleet Management
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

RB Global has a beta of 0.034, suggesting that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Element Fleet Management has a beta of 0.612849, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

RB Global beats Element Fleet Management on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does RB Global compare to Boyd Group Services?

RB Global (TSE:RBA) and Boyd Group Services (TSE:BYD) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

RB Global has a beta of 0.034, suggesting that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Boyd Group Services has a beta of 1.017187, suggesting that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Boyd Group Services had 1 more articles in the media than RB Global. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Boyd Group Services and 0 mentions for RB Global. RB Global's average media sentiment score of 1.88 beat Boyd Group Services' score of -1.10 indicating that RB Global is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
RB Global Very Positive
Boyd Group Services Negative

81.8% of RB Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.8% of Boyd Group Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of RB Global shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Boyd Group Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

RB Global currently has a consensus target price of C$134.50, suggesting a potential upside of 17.23%. Boyd Group Services has a consensus target price of C$230.00, suggesting a potential upside of 84.90%. Given Boyd Group Services' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Boyd Group Services is more favorable than RB Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
RB Global
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25
Boyd Group Services
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.08

RB Global pays an annual dividend of C$1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Boyd Group Services pays an annual dividend of C$0.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. RB Global pays out 53.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Boyd Group Services pays out 99.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. RB Global is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

RB Global has higher revenue and earnings than Boyd Group Services. RB Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Boyd Group Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RB GlobalC$4.85B4.38C$206.01MC$2.3249.45
Boyd Group ServicesC$3.59B0.96C$29.07MC$0.45276.42

RB Global has a net margin of 9.97% compared to Boyd Group Services' net margin of 0.26%. RB Global's return on equity of 8.00% beat Boyd Group Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RB Global9.97% 8.00% 4.03%
Boyd Group Services 0.26%0.61%3.95%

Summary

RB Global beats Boyd Group Services on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does RB Global compare to Black Diamond Group?

Black Diamond Group (TSE:BDI) and RB Global (TSE:RBA) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Black Diamond Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. RB Global pays an annual dividend of C$1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Black Diamond Group pays out 48.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. RB Global pays out 53.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Black Diamond Group has a beta of 1.077101, indicating that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RB Global has a beta of 0.034, indicating that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the broader market.

RB Global has a net margin of 9.97% compared to Black Diamond Group's net margin of 4.60%. RB Global's return on equity of 8.00% beat Black Diamond Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Black Diamond Group4.60% 5.89% 4.98%
RB Global 9.97%8.00%4.03%

RB Global has higher revenue and earnings than Black Diamond Group. Black Diamond Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RB Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Black Diamond GroupC$508.49M2.28C$24.61MC$0.3548.94
RB GlobalC$4.85B4.38C$206.01MC$2.3249.45

Black Diamond Group presently has a consensus target price of C$19.25, indicating a potential upside of 12.38%. RB Global has a consensus target price of C$134.50, indicating a potential upside of 17.23%. Given RB Global's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe RB Global is more favorable than Black Diamond Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Black Diamond Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
RB Global
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

In the previous week, RB Global's average media sentiment score of 1.88 beat Black Diamond Group's score of 0.00 indicating that RB Global is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Black Diamond Group Neutral
RB Global Very Positive

20.9% of Black Diamond Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.8% of RB Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.8% of Black Diamond Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of RB Global shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

RB Global beats Black Diamond Group on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does RB Global compare to K-Bro Linen?

K-Bro Linen (TSE:KBL) and RB Global (TSE:RBA) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk, profitability and dividends.

K-Bro Linen has a beta of 0.889944, suggesting that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RB Global has a beta of 0.034, suggesting that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the broader market.

K-Bro Linen currently has a consensus price target of C$53.17, suggesting a potential upside of 22.19%. RB Global has a consensus price target of C$134.50, suggesting a potential upside of 17.23%. Given K-Bro Linen's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe K-Bro Linen is more favorable than RB Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
K-Bro Linen
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.17
RB Global
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

RB Global has a net margin of 9.97% compared to K-Bro Linen's net margin of 3.67%. RB Global's return on equity of 8.00% beat K-Bro Linen's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
K-Bro Linen3.67% 7.89% 4.90%
RB Global 9.97%8.00%4.03%

K-Bro Linen pays an annual dividend of C$1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. RB Global pays an annual dividend of C$1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. K-Bro Linen pays out 70.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. RB Global pays out 53.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

RB Global has higher revenue and earnings than K-Bro Linen. K-Bro Linen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RB Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
K-Bro LinenC$592.20M0.95C$18.80MC$1.7125.44
RB GlobalC$4.85B4.38C$206.01MC$2.3249.45

24.4% of K-Bro Linen shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.8% of RB Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of K-Bro Linen shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of RB Global shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, K-Bro Linen had 1 more articles in the media than RB Global. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for K-Bro Linen and 0 mentions for RB Global. RB Global's average media sentiment score of 1.88 beat K-Bro Linen's score of 0.92 indicating that RB Global is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
K-Bro Linen Positive
RB Global Very Positive

Summary

RB Global beats K-Bro Linen on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does RB Global compare to Waste Connections?

Waste Connections (TSE:WCN) and RB Global (TSE:RBA) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, earnings and valuation.

Waste Connections has higher revenue and earnings than RB Global. RB Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Waste Connections, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Waste ConnectionsC$9.76B5.93C$662.45MC$4.1455.56
RB GlobalC$4.85B4.38C$206.01MC$2.3249.45

Waste Connections pays an annual dividend of C$1.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. RB Global pays an annual dividend of C$1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Waste Connections pays out 33.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. RB Global pays out 53.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Waste Connections had 1 more articles in the media than RB Global. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Waste Connections and 0 mentions for RB Global. RB Global's average media sentiment score of 1.88 beat Waste Connections' score of 0.75 indicating that RB Global is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Waste Connections Positive
RB Global Very Positive

56.3% of Waste Connections shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.8% of RB Global shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Waste Connections shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of RB Global shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

RB Global has a consensus target price of C$134.50, indicating a potential upside of 17.23%. Given RB Global's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe RB Global is more favorable than Waste Connections.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Waste Connections
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
6 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.71
RB Global
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

Waste Connections has a beta of 0.434529, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RB Global has a beta of 0.034, meaning that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the broader market.

Waste Connections has a net margin of 10.86% compared to RB Global's net margin of 9.97%. Waste Connections' return on equity of 13.03% beat RB Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Waste Connections10.86% 13.03% 5.00%
RB Global 9.97%8.00%4.03%

Summary

Waste Connections beats RB Global on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get RB Global News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for RBA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RBA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

RBA vs. The Competition

MetricRB GlobalCommercial Services & Supplies IndustryIndustrials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$21.25BC$4.24BC$10.42BC$12.52B
Dividend Yield1.53%5.09%97.16%6.24%
P/E Ratio49.4530.3026.2839.47
Price / Sales4.381,734.09408.889.82
Price / Cash19.6222.2923.8182.29
Price / Book3.524.194.604.71
Net IncomeC$206.01MC$146.08MC$610.41MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-3.60%-1.25%-1.84%-1.21%
1 Month Performance-25.38%0.56%-0.42%4.89%
1 Year Performance-27.53%4.72%10.55%28.63%

RB Global Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
RBA
RB Global
2.856 of 5 stars
C$114.73
0.0%
C$134.50
+17.2%
-28.1%C$21.25BC$4.85B49.454,200
EFN
Element Fleet Management
3.3776 of 5 stars
C$26.25
+0.2%
C$42.14
+60.5%
-28.2%C$10.27BC$2.45B35.472,700
BYD
Boyd Group Services
2.4926 of 5 stars
C$118.29
+2.9%
C$230.00
+94.4%
-47.1%C$3.29BC$3.59B262.8715,800
BDI
Black Diamond Group
1.3191 of 5 stars
C$17.14
+1.1%
C$19.25
+12.3%
+49.4%C$1.16BC$508.49M48.97485
KBL
K-Bro Linen
3.9311 of 5 stars
C$45.18
-2.4%
C$53.17
+17.7%
+23.0%C$581.29MC$592.20M26.423,050

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:RBA) was last updated on 9/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners