Free Trial

GFL Environmental (GFL) Competitors

GFL Environmental logo
C$50.30 +0.18 (+0.36%)
As of 06/12/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

GFL vs. CCO, WCN, RBA, GIB.A, and QBR.A

Should you buy GFL Environmental stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares GFL Environmental with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with GFL Environmental include Cameco (CCO), Waste Connections (WCN), RB Global (RBA), CGI (GIB.A), and Quebecor (QBR.A). These companies are all part of the "business services" industry.

How does GFL Environmental compare to Cameco?

Cameco (TSE:CCO) and GFL Environmental (TSE:GFL) are both large-cap business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk and media sentiment.

46.8% of Cameco shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.2% of GFL Environmental shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Cameco shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of GFL Environmental shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cameco has a beta of 0.811965, suggesting that its share price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GFL Environmental has a beta of 0.171214, suggesting that its share price is 83% less volatile than the broader market.

Cameco has higher earnings, but lower revenue than GFL Environmental. GFL Environmental is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cameco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CamecoC$3.54B17.36C$117.81MC$1.4994.65
GFL EnvironmentalC$6.70B2.71-C$594.65MC$0.6972.90

Cameco has a net margin of 18.39% compared to GFL Environmental's net margin of 3.12%. Cameco's return on equity of 9.47% beat GFL Environmental's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cameco18.39% 9.47% 2.38%
GFL Environmental 3.12%3.01%1.22%

In the previous week, GFL Environmental had 2 more articles in the media than Cameco. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for GFL Environmental and 2 mentions for Cameco. Cameco's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat GFL Environmental's score of -0.24 indicating that Cameco is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cameco
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
GFL Environmental
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Cameco presently has a consensus target price of C$174.50, indicating a potential upside of 23.73%. Given Cameco's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cameco is more favorable than GFL Environmental.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cameco
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.87
GFL Environmental
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
4 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.60

Cameco pays an annual dividend of C$0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. GFL Environmental pays an annual dividend of C$0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Cameco pays out 16.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. GFL Environmental pays out 12.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Cameco beats GFL Environmental on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GFL Environmental compare to Waste Connections?

Waste Connections (TSE:WCN) and GFL Environmental (TSE:GFL) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Waste Connections pays an annual dividend of C$1.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. GFL Environmental pays an annual dividend of C$0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Waste Connections pays out 32.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. GFL Environmental pays out 12.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Waste Connections
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
7 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.75
GFL Environmental
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
4 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.60

Waste Connections has a beta of 0.510158, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GFL Environmental has a beta of 0.171214, indicating that its stock price is 83% less volatile than the broader market.

Waste Connections has a net margin of 10.98% compared to GFL Environmental's net margin of 3.12%. Waste Connections' return on equity of 12.83% beat GFL Environmental's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Waste Connections10.98% 12.83% 5.00%
GFL Environmental 3.12%3.01%1.22%

In the previous week, GFL Environmental had 3 more articles in the media than Waste Connections. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for GFL Environmental and 1 mentions for Waste Connections. Waste Connections' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat GFL Environmental's score of -0.24 indicating that Waste Connections is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Waste Connections
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
GFL Environmental
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Waste Connections has higher revenue and earnings than GFL Environmental. Waste Connections is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GFL Environmental, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Waste ConnectionsC$9.61B5.77C$662.45MC$4.1053.25
GFL EnvironmentalC$6.70B2.71-C$594.65MC$0.6972.90

57.4% of Waste Connections shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.2% of GFL Environmental shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Waste Connections shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of GFL Environmental shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Waste Connections beats GFL Environmental on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GFL Environmental compare to RB Global?

RB Global (TSE:RBA) and GFL Environmental (TSE:GFL) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

RB Global currently has a consensus target price of C$124.00, suggesting a potential downside of 17.62%. Given RB Global's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe RB Global is more favorable than GFL Environmental.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
RB Global
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
GFL Environmental
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
4 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.60

RB Global pays an annual dividend of C$1.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. GFL Environmental pays an annual dividend of C$0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. RB Global pays out 56.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. GFL Environmental pays out 12.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, GFL Environmental had 2 more articles in the media than RB Global. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for GFL Environmental and 2 mentions for RB Global. RB Global's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat GFL Environmental's score of -0.24 indicating that RB Global is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
RB Global
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
GFL Environmental
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

RB Global has a net margin of 9.53% compared to GFL Environmental's net margin of 3.12%. RB Global's return on equity of 7.47% beat GFL Environmental's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RB Global9.53% 7.47% 4.03%
GFL Environmental 3.12%3.01%1.22%

80.0% of RB Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.2% of GFL Environmental shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of RB Global shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of GFL Environmental shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

RB Global has a beta of 0.12841, indicating that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GFL Environmental has a beta of 0.171214, indicating that its stock price is 83% less volatile than the broader market.

RB Global has higher earnings, but lower revenue than GFL Environmental. RB Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GFL Environmental, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RB GlobalC$4.72B5.95C$206.01MC$2.1570.01
GFL EnvironmentalC$6.70B2.71-C$594.65MC$0.6972.90

Summary

RB Global beats GFL Environmental on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GFL Environmental compare to CGI?

CGI (TSE:GIB.A) and GFL Environmental (TSE:GFL) are both large-cap business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, CGI and CGI both had 4 articles in the media. CGI's average media sentiment score of 0.05 beat GFL Environmental's score of -0.24 indicating that CGI is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CGI
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
GFL Environmental
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

36.8% of CGI shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.2% of GFL Environmental shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of CGI shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of GFL Environmental shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CGI has a beta of 0.091585, indicating that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GFL Environmental has a beta of 0.171214, indicating that its stock price is 83% less volatile than the broader market.

CGI has a net margin of 11.51% compared to GFL Environmental's net margin of 3.12%. CGI's return on equity of 19.51% beat GFL Environmental's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CGI11.51% 19.51% 9.35%
GFL Environmental 3.12%3.01%1.22%

CGI pays an annual dividend of C$0.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. GFL Environmental pays an annual dividend of C$0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. CGI pays out 6.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. GFL Environmental pays out 12.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CGI is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

CGI has higher revenue and earnings than GFL Environmental. CGI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GFL Environmental, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CGIC$16.34B1.19C$1.67BC$7.6612.17
GFL EnvironmentalC$6.70B2.71-C$594.65MC$0.6972.90

CGI presently has a consensus price target of C$126.31, suggesting a potential upside of 35.52%. Given CGI's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe CGI is more favorable than GFL Environmental.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CGI
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
GFL Environmental
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
4 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.60

Summary

CGI beats GFL Environmental on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GFL Environmental compare to Quebecor?

Quebecor (TSE:QBR.A) and GFL Environmental (TSE:GFL) are both large-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Quebecor pays an annual dividend of C$1.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. GFL Environmental pays an annual dividend of C$0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Quebecor pays out 37.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. GFL Environmental pays out 12.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Quebecor has a beta of 0.668209, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GFL Environmental has a beta of 0.171214, suggesting that its stock price is 83% less volatile than the broader market.

Quebecor has higher earnings, but lower revenue than GFL Environmental. Quebecor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GFL Environmental, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
QuebecorC$5.73B2.72C$736.30MC$3.8418.02
GFL EnvironmentalC$6.70B2.71-C$594.65MC$0.6972.90

In the previous week, GFL Environmental had 4 more articles in the media than Quebecor. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for GFL Environmental and 0 mentions for Quebecor. Quebecor's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat GFL Environmental's score of -0.24 indicating that Quebecor is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Quebecor Neutral
GFL Environmental Neutral

Quebecor has a net margin of 12.99% compared to GFL Environmental's net margin of 3.12%. Quebecor's return on equity of 37.44% beat GFL Environmental's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quebecor12.99% 37.44% 7.05%
GFL Environmental 3.12%3.01%1.22%

2.8% of Quebecor shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.2% of GFL Environmental shares are owned by institutional investors. 91.1% of Quebecor shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of GFL Environmental shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Quebecor currently has a consensus target price of C$56.13, suggesting a potential downside of 18.88%. Given Quebecor's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Quebecor is more favorable than GFL Environmental.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quebecor
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
GFL Environmental
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
4 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.60

Summary

Quebecor beats GFL Environmental on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get GFL Environmental News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GFL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GFL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GFL vs. The Competition

MetricGFL EnvironmentalWaste Management IndustryIndustrials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$18.16BC$6.26BC$9.41BC$12.89B
Dividend Yield0.17%1.59%3.56%6.20%
P/E Ratio72.9026.0425.5237.12
Price / Sales2.7110.765,066.0610.45
Price / Cash55.1140.6527.6082.29
Price / Book2.423.804.734.47
Net Income-C$594.65MC$66.26MC$793.53MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance1.60%1.45%5.20%0.89%
1 Month Performance1.39%-0.74%4.43%-1.08%
1 Year Performance-26.32%137.22%30.01%42.19%

GFL Environmental Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GFL
GFL Environmental
0.614 of 5 stars
C$50.30
+0.4%
N/A-27.2%C$18.16BC$6.70B72.9019,500
CCO
Cameco
2.9475 of 5 stars
C$166.86
+7.1%
C$174.50
+4.6%
+56.7%C$67.87BC$3.54B111.994,700
WCN
Waste Connections
0.9639 of 5 stars
C$206.12
-0.4%
N/A-16.2%C$52.42BC$9.61B50.2722,100
RBA
RB Global
1.0228 of 5 stars
C$144.97
-0.5%
C$124.00
-14.5%
+3.1%C$27.01BC$4.72B67.434,200
GIB.A
CGI
3.7271 of 5 stars
C$95.91
-2.5%
C$126.31
+31.7%
-37.6%C$20.61BC$16.34B12.5290,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:GFL) was last updated on 6/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners