Free Trial

Waste Connections (WCN) Competitors

Waste Connections logo
C$214.93 -3.64 (-1.67%)
As of 04:25 PM Eastern

WCN vs. CCO, RBA, GIB.A, GFL, and STN

Should you be buying Waste Connections stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Waste Connections include Cameco (CCO), RB Global (RBA), CGI (GIB.A), GFL Environmental (GFL), and Stantec (STN). These companies are all part of the "business services" industry.

How does Waste Connections compare to Cameco?

Waste Connections (TSE:WCN) and Cameco (TSE:CCO) are both large-cap business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation and institutional ownership.

Cameco has a net margin of 16.93% compared to Waste Connections' net margin of 10.98%. Waste Connections' return on equity of 12.83% beat Cameco's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Waste Connections10.98% 12.83% 5.00%
Cameco 16.93%8.76%2.38%

Waste Connections has a beta of 0.482716, indicating that its share price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cameco has a beta of 0.758241, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Cameco has a consensus target price of C$174.85, suggesting a potential upside of 11.91%. Given Cameco's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cameco is more favorable than Waste Connections.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Waste Connections
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
9 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.80
Cameco
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.93

Waste Connections pays an annual dividend of C$1.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Cameco pays an annual dividend of C$0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Waste Connections pays out 32.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cameco pays out 17.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Waste Connections has higher revenue and earnings than Cameco. Waste Connections is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cameco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Waste ConnectionsC$9.61B5.68C$662.45MC$4.1052.42
CamecoC$3.48B19.54C$117.81MC$1.35115.73

In the previous week, Cameco had 2 more articles in the media than Waste Connections. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Cameco and 4 mentions for Waste Connections. Cameco's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Waste Connections' score of 0.33 indicating that Cameco is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Waste Connections
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Cameco
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

59.0% of Waste Connections shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.9% of Cameco shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Waste Connections shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Cameco shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Waste Connections beats Cameco on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Waste Connections compare to RB Global?

RB Global (TSE:RBA) and Waste Connections (TSE:WCN) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends and institutional ownership.

Waste Connections has a net margin of 10.98% compared to RB Global's net margin of 9.32%. Waste Connections' return on equity of 12.83% beat RB Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RB Global9.32% 7.25% 4.03%
Waste Connections 10.98%12.83%5.00%

RB Global has a beta of 0.271126, suggesting that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Waste Connections has a beta of 0.482716, suggesting that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500.

RB Global presently has a consensus target price of C$124.00, suggesting a potential downside of 14.65%. Given RB Global's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe RB Global is more favorable than Waste Connections.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
RB Global
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Waste Connections
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
9 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.80

RB Global pays an annual dividend of C$1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Waste Connections pays an annual dividend of C$1.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. RB Global pays out 58.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Waste Connections pays out 32.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Waste Connections has higher revenue and earnings than RB Global. Waste Connections is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RB Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RB GlobalC$4.59B5.88C$206.01MC$2.0471.22
Waste ConnectionsC$9.61B5.68C$662.45MC$4.1052.42

In the previous week, Waste Connections had 2 more articles in the media than RB Global. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Waste Connections and 2 mentions for RB Global. RB Global's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Waste Connections' score of 0.33 indicating that RB Global is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
RB Global
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Waste Connections
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

80.9% of RB Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.0% of Waste Connections shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of RB Global shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Waste Connections shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Waste Connections beats RB Global on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Waste Connections compare to CGI?

CGI (TSE:GIB.A) and Waste Connections (TSE:WCN) are both large-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends and institutional ownership.

CGI pays an annual dividend of C$0.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Waste Connections pays an annual dividend of C$1.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. CGI pays out 6.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Waste Connections pays out 32.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

CGI has a beta of 0.089216, suggesting that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Waste Connections has a beta of 0.482716, suggesting that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500.

35.9% of CGI shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.0% of Waste Connections shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of CGI shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Waste Connections shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CGI has a net margin of 11.51% compared to Waste Connections' net margin of 10.98%. CGI's return on equity of 19.51% beat Waste Connections' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CGI11.51% 19.51% 9.35%
Waste Connections 10.98%12.83%5.00%

CGI has higher revenue and earnings than Waste Connections. CGI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Waste Connections, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CGIC$16.34B1.17C$1.67BC$7.6611.92
Waste ConnectionsC$9.61B5.68C$662.45MC$4.1052.42

CGI presently has a consensus target price of C$127.46, suggesting a potential upside of 39.59%. Given CGI's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe CGI is more favorable than Waste Connections.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CGI
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Waste Connections
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
9 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.80

In the previous week, CGI had 17 more articles in the media than Waste Connections. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for CGI and 4 mentions for Waste Connections. Waste Connections' average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat CGI's score of -0.21 indicating that Waste Connections is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CGI
0 Very Positive mention(s)
6 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Waste Connections
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

CGI beats Waste Connections on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Waste Connections compare to GFL Environmental?

GFL Environmental (TSE:GFL) and Waste Connections (TSE:WCN) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
GFL Environmental
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
5 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.67
Waste Connections
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
9 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.80

In the previous week, Waste Connections had 1 more articles in the media than GFL Environmental. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Waste Connections and 3 mentions for GFL Environmental. Waste Connections' average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat GFL Environmental's score of 0.21 indicating that Waste Connections is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
GFL Environmental
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Waste Connections
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

GFL Environmental has a beta of 0.232146, suggesting that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Waste Connections has a beta of 0.482716, suggesting that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Waste Connections has a net margin of 10.98% compared to GFL Environmental's net margin of 3.12%. Waste Connections' return on equity of 12.83% beat GFL Environmental's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GFL Environmental3.12% 3.01% 1.22%
Waste Connections 10.98%12.83%5.00%

47.9% of GFL Environmental shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.0% of Waste Connections shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of GFL Environmental shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Waste Connections shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

GFL Environmental pays an annual dividend of C$0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Waste Connections pays an annual dividend of C$1.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. GFL Environmental pays out 12.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Waste Connections pays out 32.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Waste Connections has higher revenue and earnings than GFL Environmental. Waste Connections is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GFL Environmental, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GFL EnvironmentalC$6.70B2.72-C$594.65MC$0.6973.06
Waste ConnectionsC$9.61B5.68C$662.45MC$4.1052.42

Summary

Waste Connections beats GFL Environmental on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Waste Connections compare to Stantec?

Waste Connections (TSE:WCN) and Stantec (TSE:STN) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Waste Connections pays an annual dividend of C$1.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Stantec pays an annual dividend of C$0.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Waste Connections pays out 32.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Stantec pays out 21.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Stantec is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Waste Connections has higher revenue and earnings than Stantec. Stantec is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Waste Connections, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Waste ConnectionsC$9.61B5.68C$662.45MC$4.1052.42
StantecC$8.14B1.76C$341.38MC$4.2029.92

Waste Connections has a beta of 0.482716, meaning that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Stantec has a beta of 0.7562, meaning that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Waste Connections has a net margin of 10.98% compared to Stantec's net margin of 6.47%. Stantec's return on equity of 15.28% beat Waste Connections' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Waste Connections10.98% 12.83% 5.00%
Stantec 6.47%15.28%5.70%

In the previous week, Waste Connections and Waste Connections both had 4 articles in the media. Waste Connections' average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat Stantec's score of -0.86 indicating that Waste Connections is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Waste Connections
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Stantec
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

59.0% of Waste Connections shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.6% of Stantec shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Waste Connections shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Stantec shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Stantec has a consensus target price of C$159.00, suggesting a potential upside of 26.53%. Given Stantec's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Stantec is more favorable than Waste Connections.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Waste Connections
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
9 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.80
Stantec
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.90

Summary

Waste Connections and Stantec tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Waste Connections News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WCN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WCN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

WCN vs. The Competition

MetricWaste ConnectionsWaste Management IndustryIndustrials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$54.61BC$6.19BC$9.35BC$11.72B
Dividend Yield0.87%1.60%3.57%6.22%
P/E Ratio52.4216.3225.1823.83
Price / Sales5.6810.874,989.6813.46
Price / Cash230.0540.6527.0982.69
Price / Book6.814.324.734.48
Net IncomeC$662.45MC$66.26MC$792.42MC$300.68M
7 Day Performance-3.92%-0.12%0.86%0.12%
1 Month Performance-7.01%3.93%7.15%2.88%
1 Year Performance-21.38%111.48%41.40%57.78%

Waste Connections Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
WCN
Waste Connections
1.1462 of 5 stars
C$214.93
-1.7%
N/AN/AC$54.61BC$9.61B52.4222,100
CCO
Cameco
2.0838 of 5 stars
C$159.19
-5.2%
C$174.85
+9.8%
N/AC$69.33BC$3.48B117.924,700
RBA
RB Global
1.05 of 5 stars
C$144.08
-2.0%
C$124.00
-13.9%
N/AC$26.79BC$4.59B70.634,200
GIB.A
CGI
3.4819 of 5 stars
C$100.64
+0.5%
C$140.36
+39.5%
N/AC$21.61BC$16.21B13.4990,000
GFL
GFL Environmental
0.9821 of 5 stars
C$54.88
+1.4%
N/AN/AC$19.81BC$6.62B5.4919,500

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:WCN) was last updated on 5/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners