Which has better earnings and valuation, CCO or GIB.A?

CGI has higher revenue and earnings than Cameco. CGI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cameco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Cameco C$3.54B 18.08 C$117.81M C$1.49 98.55 CGI C$16.34B 1.13 C$1.67B C$7.66 11.54

Is CCO or GIB.A more profitable?

Cameco has a net margin of 18.39% compared to CGI's net margin of 11.51%. CGI's return on equity of 19.51% beat Cameco's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Cameco 18.39% 9.47% 2.38% CGI 11.51% 19.51% 9.35%

Does the media refer more to CCO or GIB.A?

In the previous week, Cameco had 2 more articles in the media than CGI. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Cameco and 2 mentions for CGI. CGI's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Cameco's score of 0.25 indicating that CGI is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cameco 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral CGI 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend WCN or GIB.A?

CGI has a consensus price target of C$126.31, suggesting a potential upside of 42.93%. Given CGI's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe CGI is more favorable than Waste Connections. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Waste Connections 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 7 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.75 CGI 0 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 8 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, WCN or GIB.A?

CGI has higher revenue and earnings than Waste Connections. CGI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Waste Connections, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Waste Connections C$9.61B 6.24 C$662.45M C$4.10 57.55 CGI C$16.34B 1.13 C$1.67B C$7.66 11.54

Is WCN or GIB.A more profitable?

CGI has a net margin of 11.51% compared to Waste Connections' net margin of 10.98%. CGI's return on equity of 19.51% beat Waste Connections' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Waste Connections 10.98% 12.83% 5.00% CGI 11.51% 19.51% 9.35%

Does the media refer more to WCN or GIB.A?

In the previous week, CGI had 1 more articles in the media than Waste Connections. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for CGI and 1 mentions for Waste Connections. CGI's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Waste Connections' score of -0.84 indicating that CGI is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Waste Connections 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Negative CGI 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better valuation & earnings, GIB.A or RBA?

CGI has higher revenue and earnings than RB Global. CGI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RB Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio CGI C$16.34B 1.13 C$1.67B C$7.66 11.54 RB Global C$4.72B 6.48 C$206.01M C$2.15 76.26

Is GIB.A or RBA more profitable?

CGI has a net margin of 11.51% compared to RB Global's net margin of 9.53%. CGI's return on equity of 19.51% beat RB Global's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets CGI 11.51% 19.51% 9.35% RB Global 9.53% 7.47% 4.03%

Does the media favor GIB.A or RBA?

In the previous week, CGI and CGI both had 2 articles in the media. CGI's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat RB Global's score of 0.37 indicating that CGI is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment CGI 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive RB Global 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer GIB.A or GFL?

CGI currently has a consensus price target of C$126.31, suggesting a potential upside of 42.93%. Given CGI's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe CGI is more favorable than GFL Environmental. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score CGI 0 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 8 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67 GFL Environmental 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 4 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.60

Which has higher valuation & earnings, GIB.A or GFL?

CGI has higher revenue and earnings than GFL Environmental. CGI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GFL Environmental, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio CGI C$16.34B 1.13 C$1.67B C$7.66 11.54 GFL Environmental C$6.70B 2.89 -C$594.65M C$0.69 77.74

Is GIB.A or GFL more profitable?

CGI has a net margin of 11.51% compared to GFL Environmental's net margin of 3.12%. CGI's return on equity of 19.51% beat GFL Environmental's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets CGI 11.51% 19.51% 9.35% GFL Environmental 3.12% 3.01% 1.22%

Does the media prefer GIB.A or GFL?

In the previous week, GFL Environmental had 1 more articles in the media than CGI. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for GFL Environmental and 2 mentions for CGI. CGI's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat GFL Environmental's score of 0.00 indicating that CGI is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment CGI 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive GFL Environmental 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, GIB.A or QBR.B?

CGI has higher revenue and earnings than Quebecor. CGI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quebecor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio CGI C$16.34B 1.13 C$1.67B C$7.66 11.54 Quebecor C$5.73B 2.63 C$736.30M C$3.84 17.38

Is GIB.A or QBR.B more profitable?

Quebecor has a net margin of 12.99% compared to CGI's net margin of 11.51%. Quebecor's return on equity of 37.44% beat CGI's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets CGI 11.51% 19.51% 9.35% Quebecor 12.99% 37.44% 7.05%

CGI (GIB.A) Competitors

C$88.37 -1.43 (-1.59%)

As of 06/25/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

GIB.A vs. CCO, WCN, RBA, GFL, and QBR.B

Should you buy CGI stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares CGI with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with CGI include Cameco (CCO), Waste Connections (WCN), RB Global (RBA), GFL Environmental (GFL), and Quebecor (QBR.B). These companies are all part of the "business services" industry.

How does CGI compare to Cameco?

Cameco (TSE:CCO) and CGI (TSE:GIB.A) are both large-cap business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

46.9% of Cameco shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.4% of CGI shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Cameco shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of CGI shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cameco pays an annual dividend of C$0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. CGI pays an annual dividend of C$0.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Cameco pays out 16.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CGI pays out 6.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CGI is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Cameco has a net margin of 18.39% compared to CGI's net margin of 11.51%. CGI's return on equity of 19.51% beat Cameco's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cameco	18.39%	9.47%	2.38%
CGI	11.51%	19.51%	9.35%

Cameco has a beta of 0.811965, meaning that its share price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CGI has a beta of 0.091585, meaning that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Cameco had 2 more articles in the media than CGI. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Cameco and 2 mentions for CGI. CGI's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Cameco's score of 0.25 indicating that CGI is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cameco	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
CGI	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

CGI has higher revenue and earnings than Cameco. CGI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cameco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cameco	C$3.54B	18.08	C$117.81M	C$1.49	98.55
CGI	C$16.34B	1.13	C$1.67B	C$7.66	11.54

Cameco presently has a consensus price target of C$174.50, suggesting a potential upside of 18.83%. CGI has a consensus price target of C$126.31, suggesting a potential upside of 42.93%. Given CGI's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe CGI is more favorable than Cameco.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cameco	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.87
CGI	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Summary

CGI beats Cameco on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CGI compare to Waste Connections?

Waste Connections (TSE:WCN) and CGI (TSE:GIB.A) are both large-cap business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

CGI has a net margin of 11.51% compared to Waste Connections' net margin of 10.98%. CGI's return on equity of 19.51% beat Waste Connections' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Waste Connections	10.98%	12.83%	5.00%
CGI	11.51%	19.51%	9.35%

CGI has a consensus price target of C$126.31, suggesting a potential upside of 42.93%. Given CGI's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe CGI is more favorable than Waste Connections.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Waste Connections	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	7 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.75
CGI	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

In the previous week, CGI had 1 more articles in the media than Waste Connections. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for CGI and 1 mentions for Waste Connections. CGI's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Waste Connections' score of -0.84 indicating that CGI is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Waste Connections	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative
CGI	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Waste Connections pays an annual dividend of C$1.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. CGI pays an annual dividend of C$0.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Waste Connections pays out 32.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CGI pays out 6.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Waste Connections has a beta of 0.510158, meaning that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CGI has a beta of 0.091585, meaning that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market.

57.2% of Waste Connections shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.4% of CGI shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Waste Connections shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of CGI shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CGI has higher revenue and earnings than Waste Connections. CGI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Waste Connections, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Waste Connections	C$9.61B	6.24	C$662.45M	C$4.10	57.55
CGI	C$16.34B	1.13	C$1.67B	C$7.66	11.54

Summary

CGI beats Waste Connections on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CGI compare to RB Global?

CGI (TSE:GIB.A) and RB Global (TSE:RBA) are both large-cap business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and media sentiment.

CGI pays an annual dividend of C$0.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. RB Global pays an annual dividend of C$1.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. CGI pays out 6.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. RB Global pays out 56.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

CGI has higher revenue and earnings than RB Global. CGI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RB Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CGI	C$16.34B	1.13	C$1.67B	C$7.66	11.54
RB Global	C$4.72B	6.48	C$206.01M	C$2.15	76.26

CGI has a net margin of 11.51% compared to RB Global's net margin of 9.53%. CGI's return on equity of 19.51% beat RB Global's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CGI	11.51%	19.51%	9.35%
RB Global	9.53%	7.47%	4.03%

CGI has a beta of 0.091585, suggesting that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RB Global has a beta of 0.12841, suggesting that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CGI and CGI both had 2 articles in the media. CGI's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat RB Global's score of 0.37 indicating that CGI is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
CGI	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
RB Global	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

36.4% of CGI shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.1% of RB Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of CGI shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of RB Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

CGI presently has a consensus target price of C$126.31, suggesting a potential upside of 42.93%. RB Global has a consensus target price of C$124.00, suggesting a potential downside of 24.37%. Given CGI's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe CGI is more favorable than RB Global.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CGI	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
RB Global	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

CGI beats RB Global on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CGI compare to GFL Environmental?

CGI (TSE:GIB.A) and GFL Environmental (TSE:GFL) are both large-cap business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

CGI has a beta of 0.091585, suggesting that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GFL Environmental has a beta of 0.171214, suggesting that its share price is 83% less volatile than the broader market.

CGI has higher revenue and earnings than GFL Environmental. CGI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GFL Environmental, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CGI	C$16.34B	1.13	C$1.67B	C$7.66	11.54
GFL Environmental	C$6.70B	2.89	-C$594.65M	C$0.69	77.74

CGI currently has a consensus price target of C$126.31, suggesting a potential upside of 42.93%. Given CGI's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe CGI is more favorable than GFL Environmental.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CGI	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
GFL Environmental	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	4 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.60

36.4% of CGI shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.7% of GFL Environmental shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of CGI shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of GFL Environmental shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CGI has a net margin of 11.51% compared to GFL Environmental's net margin of 3.12%. CGI's return on equity of 19.51% beat GFL Environmental's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CGI	11.51%	19.51%	9.35%
GFL Environmental	3.12%	3.01%	1.22%

In the previous week, GFL Environmental had 1 more articles in the media than CGI. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for GFL Environmental and 2 mentions for CGI. CGI's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat GFL Environmental's score of 0.00 indicating that CGI is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
CGI	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
GFL Environmental	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

CGI pays an annual dividend of C$0.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. GFL Environmental pays an annual dividend of C$0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. CGI pays out 6.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. GFL Environmental pays out 12.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CGI is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

CGI beats GFL Environmental on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CGI compare to Quebecor?

CGI (TSE:GIB.A) and Quebecor (TSE:QBR.B) are both large-cap business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

CGI has a beta of 0.091585, indicating that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quebecor has a beta of 0.640966, indicating that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

36.4% of CGI shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.8% of Quebecor shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of CGI shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Quebecor shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CGI currently has a consensus price target of C$126.31, suggesting a potential upside of 42.93%. Quebecor has a consensus price target of C$64.29, suggesting a potential downside of 3.68%. Given CGI's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe CGI is more favorable than Quebecor.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CGI	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Quebecor	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

CGI pays an annual dividend of C$0.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Quebecor pays an annual dividend of C$1.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. CGI pays out 6.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quebecor pays out 37.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, CGI had 1 more articles in the media than Quebecor. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for CGI and 1 mentions for Quebecor. Quebecor's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat CGI's score of 0.70 indicating that Quebecor is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
CGI	Positive
Quebecor	Positive

Quebecor has a net margin of 12.99% compared to CGI's net margin of 11.51%. Quebecor's return on equity of 37.44% beat CGI's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CGI	11.51%	19.51%	9.35%
Quebecor	12.99%	37.44%	7.05%

CGI has higher revenue and earnings than Quebecor. CGI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quebecor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CGI	C$16.34B	1.13	C$1.67B	C$7.66	11.54
Quebecor	C$5.73B	2.63	C$736.30M	C$3.84	17.38

Summary

CGI beats Quebecor on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CGI News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GIB.A and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

GIB.A vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	CGI	Information Technology Services Industry	Computer Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$18.51B	C$1.74B	C$38.14B	C$12.14B
Dividend Yield	0.78%	3.65%	3.30%	6.19%
P/E Ratio	11.54	8.12	170.69	35.39
Price / Sales	1.13	90.26	621.26	9.95
Price / Cash	27.77	21.23	46.33	82.29
Price / Book	2.24	3.61	9.55	4.40
Net Income	C$1.67B	C$112.05M	C$1.07B	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-1.41%	-0.50%	-1.99%	-1.79%
1 Month Performance	-4.35%	-3.08%	-0.82%	-2.95%
1 Year Performance	-37.67%	6.53%	155.15%	36.15%

CGI Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count
GIB.A CGI	3.5902 of 5 stars	C$88.37 -1.6%	C$126.31 +42.9%	-37.8%	C$18.51B	C$16.34B	11.54	90,000
CCO Cameco	2.3326 of 5 stars	C$157.25 +3.6%	C$174.50 +11.0%	+49.8%	C$68.49B	C$3.54B	105.54	4,700
WCN Waste Connections	1.3606 of 5 stars	C$225.95 +4.0%	N/A	-7.4%	C$57.41B	C$9.61B	55.11	22,100
RBA RB Global	1.3823 of 5 stars	C$154.56 +0.4%	C$124.00 -19.8%	+14.2%	C$28.79B	C$4.72B	71.89	4,200
GFL GFL Environmental	0.4847 of 5 stars	C$51.14 +3.1%	N/A	-21.4%	C$18.46B	C$6.70B	74.12	19,500

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:GIB.A) was last updated on 6/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

CGI (GIB.A) Competitors