Go Pro
→ The end may be near for these iconic stocks (From Chaikin Analytics) (Ad)tc pixel Free GIB.A Stock Alerts

CGI (GIB.A) Competitors

CGI logo
C$101.80 -3.06 (-2.92%)
As of 08/5/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Compare

GIB.A vs. WCN, CCO, RBA, GFL, and QBR.A

Should you buy CGI stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares CGI with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with CGI include Waste Connections (WCN), Cameco (CCO), RB Global (RBA), GFL Environmental (GFL), and Quebecor (QBR.A).

How does CGI compare to Waste Connections?

CGI (TSE:GIB.A) and Waste Connections (TSE:WCN) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

36.4% of CGI shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.0% of Waste Connections shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of CGI shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Waste Connections shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CGI has higher revenue and earnings than Waste Connections. CGI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Waste Connections, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CGIC$16.44B1.28C$1.67BC$8.0512.65
Waste ConnectionsC$9.76B5.95C$662.45MC$4.1455.67

In the previous week, CGI had 12 more articles in the media than Waste Connections. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for CGI and 4 mentions for Waste Connections. CGI's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Waste Connections' score of -0.46 indicating that CGI is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CGI
1 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Waste Connections
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

CGI pays an annual dividend of C$0.49 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Waste Connections pays an annual dividend of C$1.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. CGI pays out 6.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Waste Connections pays out 33.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

CGI has a beta of 0.143896, meaning that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Waste Connections has a beta of 0.434529, meaning that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

CGI currently has a consensus target price of C$124.23, indicating a potential upside of 22.03%. Given CGI's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe CGI is more favorable than Waste Connections.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CGI
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.58
Waste Connections
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
6 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.71

CGI has a net margin of 11.51% compared to Waste Connections' net margin of 10.86%. CGI's return on equity of 19.51% beat Waste Connections' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CGI11.51% 19.51% 9.35%
Waste Connections 10.86%13.03%5.00%

Summary

CGI beats Waste Connections on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CGI compare to Cameco?

CGI (TSE:GIB.A) and Cameco (TSE:CCO) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

CGI has a beta of 0.143896, indicating that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cameco has a beta of 0.775621, indicating that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CGI had 4 more articles in the media than Cameco. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for CGI and 12 mentions for Cameco. CGI's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Cameco's score of 0.32 indicating that CGI is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CGI
1 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Cameco
2 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

CGI pays an annual dividend of C$0.49 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Cameco pays an annual dividend of C$0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. CGI pays out 6.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cameco pays out 29.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CGI is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

CGI has higher revenue and earnings than Cameco. CGI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cameco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CGIC$16.44B1.28C$1.67BC$8.0512.65
CamecoC$3.47B16.57C$117.81MC$0.81163.21

CGI currently has a consensus price target of C$124.23, suggesting a potential upside of 22.03%. Cameco has a consensus price target of C$175.61, suggesting a potential upside of 32.83%. Given Cameco's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cameco is more favorable than CGI.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CGI
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.58
Cameco
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

CGI has a net margin of 11.51% compared to Cameco's net margin of 10.21%. CGI's return on equity of 19.51% beat Cameco's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CGI11.51% 19.51% 9.35%
Cameco 10.21%5.09%2.38%

36.4% of CGI shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.1% of Cameco shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of CGI shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Cameco shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

CGI beats Cameco on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CGI compare to RB Global?

CGI (TSE:GIB.A) and RB Global (TSE:RBA) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and profitability.

CGI presently has a consensus price target of C$124.23, indicating a potential upside of 22.03%. RB Global has a consensus price target of C$134.50, indicating a potential upside of 0.34%. Given CGI's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CGI is more favorable than RB Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CGI
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.58
RB Global
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

CGI has a beta of 0.143896, indicating that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RB Global has a beta of 0.034, indicating that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the broader market.

36.4% of CGI shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.3% of RB Global shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of CGI shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of RB Global shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CGI pays an annual dividend of C$0.49 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. RB Global pays an annual dividend of C$1.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. CGI pays out 6.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. RB Global pays out 56.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

CGI has a net margin of 11.51% compared to RB Global's net margin of 9.53%. CGI's return on equity of 19.51% beat RB Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CGI11.51% 19.51% 9.35%
RB Global 9.53%7.47%4.03%

CGI has higher revenue and earnings than RB Global. CGI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RB Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CGIC$16.44B1.28C$1.67BC$8.0512.65
RB GlobalC$4.72B5.29C$206.01MC$2.1562.35

In the previous week, CGI had 12 more articles in the media than RB Global. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for CGI and 4 mentions for RB Global. CGI's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat RB Global's score of 0.00 indicating that CGI is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CGI
1 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
RB Global
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

CGI beats RB Global on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CGI compare to GFL Environmental?

CGI (TSE:GIB.A) and GFL Environmental (TSE:GFL) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

CGI has a net margin of 11.51% compared to GFL Environmental's net margin of -3.26%. CGI's return on equity of 19.51% beat GFL Environmental's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CGI11.51% 19.51% 9.35%
GFL Environmental -3.26%-3.32%1.22%

In the previous week, CGI had 11 more articles in the media than GFL Environmental. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for CGI and 5 mentions for GFL Environmental. CGI's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat GFL Environmental's score of 0.48 indicating that CGI is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CGI
1 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
GFL Environmental
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

CGI presently has a consensus price target of C$124.23, indicating a potential upside of 22.03%. Given CGI's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe CGI is more favorable than GFL Environmental.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CGI
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.58
GFL Environmental
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
4 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.60

CGI has higher revenue and earnings than GFL Environmental. GFL Environmental is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CGI, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CGIC$16.44B1.28C$1.67BC$8.0512.65
GFL EnvironmentalC$6.97B2.99-C$594.65M-C$0.49N/A

CGI has a beta of 0.143896, suggesting that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GFL Environmental has a beta of 0.108098, suggesting that its stock price is 89% less volatile than the broader market.

36.4% of CGI shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.6% of GFL Environmental shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of CGI shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of GFL Environmental shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CGI pays an annual dividend of C$0.49 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. GFL Environmental pays an annual dividend of C$0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. CGI pays out 6.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. GFL Environmental pays out -17.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

CGI beats GFL Environmental on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CGI compare to Quebecor?

CGI (TSE:GIB.A) and Quebecor (TSE:QBR.A) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, earnings and media sentiment.

Quebecor has a net margin of 12.99% compared to CGI's net margin of 11.51%. Quebecor's return on equity of 37.44% beat CGI's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CGI11.51% 19.51% 9.35%
Quebecor 12.99%37.44%7.05%

CGI pays an annual dividend of C$0.49 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Quebecor pays an annual dividend of C$1.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. CGI pays out 6.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quebecor pays out 37.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

CGI presently has a consensus target price of C$124.23, indicating a potential upside of 22.03%. Quebecor has a consensus target price of C$61.42, indicating a potential downside of 11.54%. Given CGI's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe CGI is more favorable than Quebecor.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CGI
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.58
Quebecor
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

36.4% of CGI shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.8% of Quebecor shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of CGI shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 91.1% of Quebecor shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, CGI had 16 more articles in the media than Quebecor. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for CGI and 0 mentions for Quebecor. CGI's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Quebecor's score of 0.00 indicating that CGI is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CGI Positive
Quebecor Neutral

CGI has higher revenue and earnings than Quebecor. CGI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quebecor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CGIC$16.44B1.28C$1.67BC$8.0512.65
QuebecorC$5.73B2.73C$736.30MC$3.8418.08

CGI has a beta of 0.143896, indicating that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quebecor has a beta of 0.740948, indicating that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

CGI beats Quebecor on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CGI News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GIB.A and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GIB.A and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GIB.A vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCGIIT Services IndustryTechnology SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$21.71BC$10.58BC$29.75BC$12.60B
Dividend Yield0.65%2.88%2.74%6.20%
P/E Ratio12.6516.7181.2134.28
Price / Sales1.2868.96599.019.70
Price / Cash27.7742.9050.7682.29
Price / Book2.5824.509.254.49
Net IncomeC$1.67BC$273.10MC$662.75MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-0.85%2.68%4.47%2.04%
1 Month Performance7.94%2.64%-1.35%0.92%
1 Year Performance-23.31%27.80%150.49%33.65%

CGI Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GIB.A
CGI
3.2849 of 5 stars		C$101.80
-2.9%		C$124.23
+22.0%		-24.2%C$21.71BC$16.44B12.6590,000
WCN
Waste Connections
1.3493 of 5 stars		C$237.38
-0.9%		N/A-10.5%C$59.83BC$9.76B57.3422,100
CCO
Cameco
3.323 of 5 stars		C$122.33
-3.0%		C$175.61
+43.6%		+28.6%C$53.28BC$3.54B82.104,700
RBA
RB Global
0.8609 of 5 stars		C$164.49
+0.1%		C$134.50
-18.2%		-11.2%C$30.64BC$4.72B76.514,200
GFL
GFL Environmental
0.6668 of 5 stars		C$55.16
+0.2%		N/A-16.6%C$19.91BC$6.70B79.9419,500

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:GIB.A) was last updated on 8/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The dollar reset no one told you about
Porter Stansberry says a dollar reset is underway - one that has happened only once before in America's 250-ye...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Central banks bought 710 tonnes - this fund pays monthly
Gold is hitting new highs, fueled by tariffs and record central bank demand - 710 tonnes per quarter. JPMorgan...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
The Starlink of Energy
A portable energy unit - already used by the U.S. Navy for decades - is now drawing serious attention from Big...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
Palantir’s 1,540% vs 32,481% company no one’s talking about
Palantir investors who bought at IPO are sitting on gains near 1540%. But Mode Mobile, still private, has alre...
Mode Mobile | Sponsoredtc pixel
Control 100 shares without spending thousands of dollars
Would you rather spend $5,000 buying 100 shares of a $50 stock, or control those same 100 shares for a fractio...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
He bet half his $9 billion on ONE stock
One of the most successful fund managers of the past 50 years put more than $4.5 billion - over half his fund ...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel