Trisura Group (TSU) Competitors

Trisura Group logo
C$42.43 -0.15 (-0.35%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

TSU vs. ELF, CWB, GLXY, BITF, and CIX

Should you buy Trisura Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Trisura Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Trisura Group include E-L Financial (ELF), Canadian Western Bank (CWB), Galaxy Digital (GLXY), Bitfarms (BITF), and CI Financial (CIX). These companies are all part of the "financial services" sector.

How does Trisura Group compare to E-L Financial?

E-L Financial (TSE:ELF) and Trisura Group (TSE:TSU) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends and institutional ownership.

Trisura Group has a consensus target price of C$56.66, indicating a potential upside of 33.53%. Given Trisura Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Trisura Group is more favorable than E-L Financial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
E-L Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Trisura Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

In the previous week, E-L Financial had 1 more articles in the media than Trisura Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for E-L Financial and 0 mentions for Trisura Group. Trisura Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat E-L Financial's score of -2.00 indicating that Trisura Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
E-L Financial Very Negative
Trisura Group Neutral

E-L Financial has a net margin of 43.93% compared to Trisura Group's net margin of 4.72%. Trisura Group's return on equity of 16.65% beat E-L Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
E-L Financial43.93% 13.43% 4.52%
Trisura Group 4.72%16.65%2.18%

3.9% of E-L Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.2% of Trisura Group shares are held by institutional investors. 57.8% of E-L Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Trisura Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

E-L Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Trisura Group. E-L Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trisura Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
E-L FinancialC$2.70B2.19C$1.84BC$3.295.19
Trisura GroupC$888.08M2.26C$111.69MC$3.1013.69

E-L Financial has a beta of 1.374092, meaning that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trisura Group has a beta of 0.638178, meaning that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

E-L Financial pays an annual dividend of C$0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Trisura Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. E-L Financial pays out 4.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trisura Group pays out 2.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

E-L Financial and Trisura Group tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trisura Group compare to Canadian Western Bank?

Trisura Group (TSE:TSU) and Canadian Western Bank (TSE:CWB) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

Trisura Group has a beta of 0.638178, indicating that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Canadian Western Bank has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

Trisura Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Canadian Western Bank pays an annual dividend of C$1.40 per share. Trisura Group pays out 2.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Canadian Western Bank pays out 45.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Trisura Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Canadian Western Bank has higher revenue and earnings than Trisura Group. Canadian Western Bank is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trisura Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trisura GroupC$888.08M2.26C$111.69MC$3.1013.69
Canadian Western BankC$1.99B0.00C$296.99MC$3.07N/A

Trisura Group presently has a consensus price target of C$56.66, suggesting a potential upside of 33.53%. Given Trisura Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trisura Group is more favorable than Canadian Western Bank.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Trisura Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Canadian Western Bank
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Trisura Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Canadian Western Bank'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Trisura Group Neutral
Canadian Western Bank Neutral

45.2% of Trisura Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.6% of Canadian Western Bank shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Trisura Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Canadian Western Bank shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Canadian Western Bank has a net margin of 25.04% compared to Trisura Group's net margin of 4.72%. Trisura Group's return on equity of 16.65% beat Canadian Western Bank's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Trisura Group4.72% 16.65% 2.18%
Canadian Western Bank 25.04%7.07%0.73%

Summary

Trisura Group beats Canadian Western Bank on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trisura Group compare to Galaxy Digital?

Trisura Group (TSE:TSU) and Galaxy Digital (TSE:GLXY) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Galaxy Digital has higher revenue and earnings than Trisura Group. Galaxy Digital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trisura Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trisura GroupC$888.08M2.26C$111.69MC$3.1013.69
Galaxy DigitalC$43.76B0.12C$1.97B-C$0.61N/A

Trisura Group has a net margin of 4.72% compared to Galaxy Digital's net margin of 0.57%. Galaxy Digital's return on equity of 18.71% beat Trisura Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Trisura Group4.72% 16.65% 2.18%
Galaxy Digital 0.57%18.71%N/A

Trisura Group has a beta of 0.638178, meaning that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Galaxy Digital has a beta of 1.18511, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

45.2% of Trisura Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.6% of Galaxy Digital shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Trisura Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Galaxy Digital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Trisura Group currently has a consensus price target of C$56.66, suggesting a potential upside of 33.53%. Given Trisura Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Trisura Group is more favorable than Galaxy Digital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Trisura Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Galaxy Digital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Galaxy Digital had 2 more articles in the media than Trisura Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Galaxy Digital and 0 mentions for Trisura Group. Galaxy Digital's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Trisura Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Galaxy Digital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Trisura Group Neutral
Galaxy Digital Positive

Summary

Trisura Group and Galaxy Digital tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trisura Group compare to Bitfarms?

Trisura Group (TSE:TSU) and Bitfarms (TSE:BITF) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

45.2% of Trisura Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.7% of Bitfarms shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Trisura Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.4% of Bitfarms shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Trisura Group has higher revenue and earnings than Bitfarms. Bitfarms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trisura Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trisura GroupC$888.08M2.26C$111.69MC$3.1013.69
BitfarmsC$229.28M21.67-C$110.66M-C$0.52N/A

Trisura Group presently has a consensus target price of C$56.66, suggesting a potential upside of 33.53%. Given Trisura Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Trisura Group is more favorable than Bitfarms.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Trisura Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Bitfarms
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Trisura Group has a net margin of 4.72% compared to Bitfarms' net margin of -160.41%. Trisura Group's return on equity of 16.65% beat Bitfarms' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Trisura Group4.72% 16.65% 2.18%
Bitfarms -160.41%-56.78%-10.66%

Trisura Group has a beta of 0.638178, indicating that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bitfarms has a beta of 3.414688, indicating that its share price is 241% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Trisura Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Bitfarms'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Trisura Group Neutral
Bitfarms Neutral

Summary

Trisura Group beats Bitfarms on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trisura Group compare to CI Financial?

Trisura Group (TSE:TSU) and CI Financial (TSE:CIX) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Trisura Group has a beta of 0.638178, indicating that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CI Financial has a beta of 1.67, indicating that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Trisura Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CI Financial'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Trisura Group Neutral
CI Financial Neutral

Trisura Group currently has a consensus price target of C$56.66, suggesting a potential upside of 33.53%. Given Trisura Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Trisura Group is more favorable than CI Financial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Trisura Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
CI Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Trisura Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. CI Financial pays an annual dividend of C$0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Trisura Group pays out 2.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CI Financial pays out -166.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CI Financial has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CI Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Trisura Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CI Financial. CI Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trisura Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trisura GroupC$888.08M2.26C$111.69MC$3.1013.69
CI FinancialC$3.57B1.29-C$69.09M-C$0.48N/A

45.2% of Trisura Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.0% of CI Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Trisura Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.8% of CI Financial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Trisura Group has a net margin of 4.72% compared to CI Financial's net margin of -10.05%. Trisura Group's return on equity of 16.65% beat CI Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Trisura Group4.72% 16.65% 2.18%
CI Financial -10.05%-63.05%4.87%

Summary

Trisura Group beats CI Financial on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Trisura Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TSU and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TSU and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TSU vs. The Competition

MetricTrisura GroupInsurance IndustryFinancial SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$2.00BC$3.03BC$6.00BC$12.19B
Dividend YieldN/A1.90%5.27%6.19%
P/E Ratio13.695.1116.3935.95
Price / Sales2.26313.301,096.3210.66
Price / Cash5.462.0489.3582.29
Price / Book2.131.516.634.50
Net IncomeC$111.69MC$474.99MC$1.13BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-0.52%0.19%0.34%0.15%
1 Month Performance3.39%0.28%2.11%1.07%
1 Year Performance1.56%54.05%20.91%41.16%

Trisura Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TSU
Trisura Group
N/AC$42.43
-0.4%
C$56.66
+33.5%
+1.8%C$2.00BC$888.08M13.699,700
ELF
E-L Financial
N/AC$16.70
-1.4%
N/A+5.7%C$5.78BC$2.70B5.08300
CWB
Canadian Western Bank
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$5.48BC$1.99B18.452,454
GLXY
Galaxy Digital
N/AC$28.26
flat
N/AN/AC$5.39BC$43.76BN/A434
BITF
Bitfarms
N/AC$8.24
flat
N/A+656.0%C$4.97BC$229.28MN/A110

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:TSU) was last updated on 6/19/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners