Free Trial

Trisura Group (TSU) Competitors

Trisura Group logo
C$40.91 -0.03 (-0.07%)
As of 12:45 PM Eastern

TSU vs. ELF, CWB, GLXY, CIX, and SII

Should you buy Trisura Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Trisura Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Trisura Group include E-L Financial (ELF), Canadian Western Bank (CWB), Galaxy Digital (GLXY), CI Financial (CIX), and Sprott (SII). These companies are all part of the "financial services" sector.

How does Trisura Group compare to E-L Financial?

E-L Financial (TSE:ELF) and Trisura Group (TSE:TSU) are both financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.

E-L Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Trisura Group. E-L Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trisura Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
E-L FinancialC$2.70B2.19C$1.84BC$3.295.20
Trisura GroupC$888.08M2.18C$111.69MC$3.1013.21

4.0% of E-L Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.1% of Trisura Group shares are held by institutional investors. 57.8% of E-L Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Trisura Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

E-L Financial pays an annual dividend of C$0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Trisura Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. E-L Financial pays out 4.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trisura Group pays out 2.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Trisura Group has a consensus price target of C$56.66, suggesting a potential upside of 38.39%. Given Trisura Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Trisura Group is more favorable than E-L Financial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
E-L Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Trisura Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

In the previous week, E-L Financial had 2 more articles in the media than Trisura Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for E-L Financial and 1 mentions for Trisura Group. E-L Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat Trisura Group's score of 0.00 indicating that E-L Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
E-L Financial
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Trisura Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

E-L Financial has a net margin of 53.61% compared to Trisura Group's net margin of 4.72%. Trisura Group's return on equity of 16.65% beat E-L Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
E-L Financial53.61% 13.53% 4.52%
Trisura Group 4.72%16.65%2.18%

E-L Financial has a beta of 1.303527, suggesting that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trisura Group has a beta of 0.418507, suggesting that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

E-L Financial beats Trisura Group on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trisura Group compare to Canadian Western Bank?

Canadian Western Bank (TSE:CWB) and Trisura Group (TSE:TSU) are both financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and media sentiment.

Trisura Group has a consensus price target of C$56.66, indicating a potential upside of 38.39%. Given Trisura Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Trisura Group is more favorable than Canadian Western Bank.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Canadian Western Bank
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Trisura Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Canadian Western Bank has a net margin of 25.04% compared to Trisura Group's net margin of 4.72%. Trisura Group's return on equity of 16.65% beat Canadian Western Bank's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Canadian Western Bank25.04% 7.07% 0.73%
Trisura Group 4.72%16.65%2.18%

In the previous week, Trisura Group had 1 more articles in the media than Canadian Western Bank. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Trisura Group and 0 mentions for Canadian Western Bank. Canadian Western Bank's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Trisura Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Canadian Western Bank Neutral
Trisura Group Neutral

Canadian Western Bank has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trisura Group has a beta of 0.418507, indicating that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

Canadian Western Bank has higher revenue and earnings than Trisura Group. Canadian Western Bank is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trisura Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Canadian Western BankC$1.99B0.00C$296.99MC$3.07N/A
Trisura GroupC$888.08M2.18C$111.69MC$3.1013.21

30.6% of Canadian Western Bank shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.1% of Trisura Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Canadian Western Bank shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Trisura Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Canadian Western Bank pays an annual dividend of C$1.40 per share. Trisura Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Canadian Western Bank pays out 45.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trisura Group pays out 2.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Trisura Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Trisura Group beats Canadian Western Bank on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trisura Group compare to Galaxy Digital?

Galaxy Digital (TSE:GLXY) and Trisura Group (TSE:TSU) are both financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Galaxy Digital has higher revenue and earnings than Trisura Group. Galaxy Digital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trisura Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Galaxy DigitalC$43.76B0.12C$1.97B-C$0.61N/A
Trisura GroupC$888.08M2.18C$111.69MC$3.1013.21

Trisura Group has a net margin of 4.72% compared to Galaxy Digital's net margin of 0.57%. Galaxy Digital's return on equity of 18.71% beat Trisura Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Galaxy Digital0.57% 18.71% N/A
Trisura Group 4.72%16.65%2.18%

56.6% of Galaxy Digital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.1% of Trisura Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Galaxy Digital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Trisura Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Trisura Group has a consensus price target of C$56.66, suggesting a potential upside of 38.39%. Given Trisura Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Trisura Group is more favorable than Galaxy Digital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Galaxy Digital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Trisura Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

In the previous week, Galaxy Digital and Galaxy Digital both had 1 articles in the media. Trisura Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Galaxy Digital's score of -0.89 indicating that Trisura Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Galaxy Digital
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
Trisura Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Galaxy Digital has a beta of 1.18511, indicating that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trisura Group has a beta of 0.418507, indicating that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Trisura Group beats Galaxy Digital on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trisura Group compare to CI Financial?

Trisura Group (TSE:TSU) and CI Financial (TSE:CIX) are both financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Trisura Group presently has a consensus target price of C$56.66, suggesting a potential upside of 38.39%. Given Trisura Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Trisura Group is more favorable than CI Financial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Trisura Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
CI Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Trisura Group had 1 more articles in the media than CI Financial. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Trisura Group and 0 mentions for CI Financial. Trisura Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CI Financial'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Trisura Group Neutral
CI Financial Neutral

45.1% of Trisura Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.0% of CI Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Trisura Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.8% of CI Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Trisura Group has a net margin of 4.72% compared to CI Financial's net margin of -10.05%. Trisura Group's return on equity of 16.65% beat CI Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Trisura Group4.72% 16.65% 2.18%
CI Financial -10.05%-63.05%4.87%

Trisura Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CI Financial. CI Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trisura Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trisura GroupC$888.08M2.18C$111.69MC$3.1013.21
CI FinancialC$3.57B1.29-C$69.09M-C$0.48N/A

Trisura Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. CI Financial pays an annual dividend of C$0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Trisura Group pays out 2.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CI Financial pays out -166.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CI Financial has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CI Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Trisura Group has a beta of 0.418507, suggesting that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CI Financial has a beta of 1.67, suggesting that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Trisura Group beats CI Financial on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trisura Group compare to Sprott?

Sprott (TSE:SII) and Trisura Group (TSE:TSU) are both financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Sprott pays an annual dividend of C$1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Trisura Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Sprott pays out 42.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trisura Group pays out 2.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Trisura Group has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. Trisura Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SprottC$368.97M12.73C$32.26MC$3.2855.55
Trisura GroupC$888.08M2.18C$111.69MC$3.1013.21

Sprott has a net margin of 22.72% compared to Trisura Group's net margin of 4.72%. Sprott's return on equity of 24.26% beat Trisura Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sprott22.72% 24.26% 10.25%
Trisura Group 4.72%16.65%2.18%

Sprott presently has a consensus price target of C$211.00, suggesting a potential upside of 15.81%. Trisura Group has a consensus price target of C$56.66, suggesting a potential upside of 38.39%. Given Trisura Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Trisura Group is more favorable than Sprott.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sprott
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Trisura Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Sprott has a beta of 1.560976, meaning that its share price is 56% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trisura Group has a beta of 0.418507, meaning that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

29.9% of Sprott shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.1% of Trisura Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.7% of Sprott shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Trisura Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Trisura Group had 1 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Trisura Group and 0 mentions for Sprott. Sprott's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Trisura Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Sprott is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sprott Positive
Trisura Group Neutral

Summary

Sprott beats Trisura Group on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Trisura Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TSU and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TSU and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TSU vs. The Competition

MetricTrisura GroupInsurance IndustryFinancial SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$1.93BC$2.99BC$5.84BC$12.03B
Dividend YieldN/A1.91%5.20%6.20%
P/E Ratio13.215.0415.8537.71
Price / Sales2.18311.901,033.8811.09
Price / Cash5.462.0493.8682.29
Price / Book2.051.486.524.52
Net IncomeC$111.69MC$474.99MC$1.14BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-0.51%-0.03%0.89%1.04%
1 Month Performance-8.17%4.64%3.01%2.82%
1 Year Performance1.21%54.04%20.45%53.95%

Trisura Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TSU
Trisura Group
2.7623 of 5 stars
C$40.94
flat
C$56.66
+38.4%
+2.5%C$1.93BC$888.08M13.219,700
ELF
E-L Financial
N/AC$16.93
+0.1%
N/A-99.0%C$5.86BC$2.70B5.15300
CWB
Canadian Western Bank
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$5.48BC$1.99B18.452,454
GLXY
Galaxy Digital
N/AC$28.26
flat
N/AN/AC$5.39BC$43.76BN/A434
CIX
CI Financial
N/AC$31.99
flat
N/A+1.6%C$4.61BC$3.57BN/A610

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:TSU) was last updated on 5/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners