Alina (ALNA) Competitors

Shaftesbury Capital has a net margin of 156.85% compared to Alina's net margin of 0.00%. Shaftesbury Capital's return on equity of 9.48% beat Alina's return on equity.

0.1% of Alina shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.3% of Shaftesbury Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 78.2% of Alina shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Shaftesbury Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Shaftesbury Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Alina. Alina is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shaftesbury Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Alina and Alina both had 2 articles in the media. Shaftesbury Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Alina's score of 0.00 indicating that Shaftesbury Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Shaftesbury Capital has a consensus target price of GBX 186.60, indicating a potential upside of 34.53%. Given Shaftesbury Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Shaftesbury Capital is more favorable than Alina.

Alina has a beta of -0.25, suggesting that its stock price is 125% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Shaftesbury Capital has a beta of 0.959, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Alina had 1 more articles in the media than Hammerson. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Alina and 1 mentions for Hammerson. Hammerson's average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat Alina's score of 0.00 indicating that Hammerson is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Alina has a beta of -0.25, meaning that its share price is 125% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hammerson has a beta of 1.786, meaning that its share price is 79% more volatile than the broader market.

0.1% of Alina shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.5% of Hammerson shares are held by institutional investors. 78.2% of Alina shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.4% of Hammerson shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Alina has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hammerson. Alina is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hammerson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Hammerson has a net margin of 86.23% compared to Alina's net margin of 0.00%. Hammerson's return on equity of 11.84% beat Alina's return on equity.

Hammerson has a consensus price target of GBX 378.57, suggesting a potential upside of 8.47%. Given Hammerson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Hammerson is more favorable than Alina.

101.1% of Shaftesbury shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Alina shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Shaftesbury shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 78.2% of Alina shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Shaftesbury has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alina has a beta of -0.25, indicating that its stock price is 125% less volatile than the broader market.

Shaftesbury has higher revenue and earnings than Alina. Alina is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shaftesbury, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Shaftesbury has a net margin of 96.75% compared to Alina's net margin of 0.00%. Shaftesbury's return on equity of 4.93% beat Alina's return on equity.

In the previous week, Alina had 2 more articles in the media than Shaftesbury. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Alina and 0 mentions for Shaftesbury. Shaftesbury's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Alina'saverage media sentiment score.

Alina has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Supermarket Income REIT. Alina is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Supermarket Income REIT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Supermarket Income REIT has a net margin of 75.21% compared to Alina's net margin of 0.00%. Supermarket Income REIT's return on equity of 7.76% beat Alina's return on equity.

In the previous week, Alina had 2 more articles in the media than Supermarket Income REIT. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Alina and 0 mentions for Supermarket Income REIT. Supermarket Income REIT's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Alina's score of 0.00 indicating that Supermarket Income REIT is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Supermarket Income REIT has a consensus price target of GBX 93, indicating a potential upside of 10.78%. Given Supermarket Income REIT's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Supermarket Income REIT is more favorable than Alina.

Alina has a beta of -0.25, indicating that its share price is 125% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Supermarket Income REIT has a beta of 0.586, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

0.1% of Alina shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.9% of Supermarket Income REIT shares are owned by institutional investors. 78.2% of Alina shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Supermarket Income REIT shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.