Alina (ALNA) Competitors

Shaftesbury Capital has a consensus price target of GBX 182.80, suggesting a potential upside of 39.86%. Given Shaftesbury Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Shaftesbury Capital is more favorable than Alina.

Alina has a beta of -0.25, suggesting that its stock price is 125% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Shaftesbury Capital has a beta of 0.953, suggesting that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Shaftesbury Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Alina. Alina is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shaftesbury Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Shaftesbury Capital had 6 more articles in the media than Alina. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Shaftesbury Capital and 0 mentions for Alina. Shaftesbury Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Alina's score of 0.38 indicating that Shaftesbury Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Shaftesbury Capital has a net margin of 141.28% compared to Alina's net margin of 0.00%. Shaftesbury Capital's return on equity of 8.78% beat Alina's return on equity.

0.0% of Alina shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.8% of Shaftesbury Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 78.2% of Alina shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Shaftesbury Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Alina's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Hammerson's score of 0.00 indicating that Alina is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Hammerson presently has a consensus target price of GBX 346.71, indicating a potential upside of 7.47%. Given Hammerson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Hammerson is more favorable than Alina.

Hammerson has a net margin of 109.58% compared to Alina's net margin of 0.00%. Hammerson's return on equity of 11.77% beat Alina's return on equity.

49.8% of Hammerson shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Alina shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.3% of Hammerson shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 78.2% of Alina shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Alina has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hammerson. Alina is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hammerson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Hammerson has a beta of 1.787, indicating that its stock price is 79% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alina has a beta of -0.25, indicating that its stock price is 125% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Alina's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Shaftesbury's score of 0.00 indicating that Alina is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Shaftesbury has higher revenue and earnings than Alina. Alina is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shaftesbury, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Shaftesbury has a net margin of 96.75% compared to Alina's net margin of 0.00%. Shaftesbury's return on equity of 4.93% beat Alina's return on equity.

Alina has a beta of -0.25, suggesting that its share price is 125% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Shaftesbury has a beta of 0.82, suggesting that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

0.0% of Alina shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 101.1% of Shaftesbury shares are held by institutional investors. 78.2% of Alina shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Shaftesbury shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Supermarket Income REIT had 1 more articles in the media than Alina. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Supermarket Income REIT and 0 mentions for Alina. Alina's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Supermarket Income REIT's score of 0.00 indicating that Alina is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Supermarket Income REIT currently has a consensus target price of GBX 86.25, suggesting a potential upside of 5.50%. Given Supermarket Income REIT's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Supermarket Income REIT is more favorable than Alina.

Supermarket Income REIT has a net margin of 54.91% compared to Alina's net margin of 0.00%. Supermarket Income REIT's return on equity of 5.56% beat Alina's return on equity.

Alina has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Supermarket Income REIT. Alina is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Supermarket Income REIT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

28.3% of Supermarket Income REIT shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Alina shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Supermarket Income REIT shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 78.2% of Alina shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Supermarket Income REIT has a beta of 0.588, suggesting that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alina has a beta of -0.25, suggesting that its share price is 125% less volatile than the broader market.