Go Pro
→ It’s not about Greenland (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free BGCG Stock Alerts

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (BGCG) Competitors

GBX 308 +2.00 (+0.65%)
As of 11:58 AM Eastern
Compare

BGCG vs. SYNC, HAN, GCP, ATR, and HANA

Should you buy Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust stock or one of its competitors? Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's main competitors and comparable companies include Syncona (SYNC), Hansa Investment (HAN), GCP Infrastructure Investments (GCP), Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. (ATR), and Hansa Investment Company Ltd 'A' (HANA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust compare to Syncona?

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (LON:BGCG) and Syncona (LON:SYNC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk and earnings.

5.1% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.2% of Syncona shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Syncona shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Syncona has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Syncona is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust£51.43M3.26-£31.39M£86.813.55
Syncona£55.89M12.30-£16.90M-£1.45N/A

Syncona has a consensus target price of GBX 189, suggesting a potential upside of 67.26%. Given Syncona's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Syncona is more favorable than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Syncona
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Syncona had 1 more articles in the media than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Syncona and 0 mentions for Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Syncona'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Neutral
Syncona Neutral

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Syncona has a beta of 0.357, suggesting that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a net margin of 96.33% compared to Syncona's net margin of -15.36%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's return on equity of 27.39% beat Syncona's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust96.33% 27.39% -30.69%
Syncona -15.36%-0.86%0.40%

Summary

Syncona beats Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust compare to Hansa Investment?

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (LON:BGCG) and Hansa Investment (LON:HAN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Hansa Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays out 2.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hansa Investment pays out 0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Hansa Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hansa Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust£51.43M3.26-£31.39M£86.813.55
Hansa Investment£136.53M4.83£77.36M£89.903.76

In the previous week, Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Hansa Investment'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Neutral
Hansa Investment Neutral

5.1% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Hansa Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.6% of Hansa Investment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hansa Investment has a net margin of 422.56% compared to Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's net margin of 96.33%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's return on equity of 27.39% beat Hansa Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust96.33% 27.39% -30.69%
Hansa Investment 422.56%17.81%13.97%

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hansa Investment has a beta of 0.209, suggesting that its share price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Hansa Investment beats Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust compare to GCP Infrastructure Investments?

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (LON:BGCG) and GCP Infrastructure Investments (LON:GCP) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and earnings.

GCP Infrastructure Investments has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GCP Infrastructure Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust£51.43M3.26-£31.39M£86.813.55
GCP Infrastructure Investments£38.32M16.95£15.58M£4.1519.90

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. GCP Infrastructure Investments pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.5%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays out 2.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. GCP Infrastructure Investments pays out 168.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, GCP Infrastructure Investments had 4 more articles in the media than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for GCP Infrastructure Investments and 0 mentions for Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. GCP Infrastructure Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that GCP Infrastructure Investments is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Neutral
GCP Infrastructure Investments Positive

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GCP Infrastructure Investments has a beta of 0.848, meaning that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market.

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a net margin of 96.33% compared to GCP Infrastructure Investments' net margin of 47.75%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's return on equity of 27.39% beat GCP Infrastructure Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust96.33% 27.39% -30.69%
GCP Infrastructure Investments 47.75%4.17%0.89%

5.1% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.4% of GCP Infrastructure Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of GCP Infrastructure Investments shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

GCP Infrastructure Investments beats Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust compare to Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.?

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. (LON:ATR) and Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (LON:BGCG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, earnings and risk.

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder Asian Total Return Inv., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.£66.61M9.73£66.84M£68.5710.21
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust£51.43M3.26-£31.39M£86.813.55

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. pays out 16.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays out 2.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. had 1 more articles in the media than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. and 0 mentions for Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. Neutral
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Neutral

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. has a net margin of 254.00% compared to Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's net margin of 96.33%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's return on equity of 27.39% beat Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.254.00% 13.06% 4.75%
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust 96.33%27.39%-30.69%

13.7% of Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. has a beta of 0.994, meaning that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. beats Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust compare to Hansa Investment Company Ltd 'A'?

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (LON:BGCG) and Hansa Investment Company Ltd 'A' (LON:HANA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Hansa Investment Company Ltd 'A' has a net margin of 422.56% compared to Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's net margin of 96.33%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's return on equity of 27.39% beat Hansa Investment Company Ltd 'A''s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust96.33% 27.39% -30.69%
Hansa Investment Company Ltd 'A' 422.56%17.81%13.97%

5.1% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of Hansa Investment Company Ltd 'A' shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 17.2% of Hansa Investment Company Ltd 'A' shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Hansa Investment Company Ltd 'A' pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays out 2.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hansa Investment Company Ltd 'A' pays out 0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Hansa Investment Company Ltd 'A' has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hansa Investment Company Ltd 'A', indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust£51.43M3.26-£31.39M£86.813.55
Hansa Investment Company Ltd 'A'£136.53M4.72£85.41M£89.903.67

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hansa Investment Company Ltd 'A' has a beta of 0.209, indicating that its share price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Hansa Investment Company Ltd 'A''saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Neutral
Hansa Investment Company Ltd 'A' Neutral

Summary

Hansa Investment Company Ltd 'A' beats Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BGCG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BGCG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BGCG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricBaillie Gifford China Growth TrustCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£167.91M£5.71B£14.06B£2.92B
Dividend Yield0.81%7.40%5.89%6.17%
P/E Ratio3.5532.5526.70367.32
Price / Sales3.261,229.48515.9283,741.35
Price / Cash77.1448.3338.5027.89
Price / Book1.482.132.187.02
Net Income-£31.39M£417.46M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.65%0.60%1.38%0.89%
1 Month Performance1.99%2.37%2.94%3.27%
1 Year Performance8.07%7.75%11.49%22.28%

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BGCG
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust
N/AGBX 308
+0.7%		N/A+9.3%£167.91M£51.43M3.55N/A
SYNC
Syncona
2.363 of 5 stars		GBX 108.40
-0.6%		GBX 189
+74.4%		+15.1%£659.29M£55.89MN/A1,208
HAN
Hansa Investment
N/AGBX 336
-1.8%		N/A+18.8%£655.48M£136.53M3.74N/A
GCP
GCP Infrastructure Investments
N/AGBX 82.50
-0.1%		N/A+10.1%£648.80M£38.32M19.881,950
ATR
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.
N/AGBX 688
-1.3%		N/A+40.1%£636.70M£66.61M10.0313,500

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:BGCG) was last updated on 8/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Bezos… DOOMED
A single FCC filing hints Elon Musk is planning his biggest project yet - bigger than Tesla, SpaceX, and X com...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Someone just dumped the biggest gold fund.
Investors pulled 2.9 billion dollars from the world's largest gold fund in a single day this March, pushing to...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Your Download Link (Expiring) If you still haven't downloaded the free Simple Options Trading For Beginners...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
A $382 trillion migration and the position no one is talking about
Trump just signed a law requiring America's entire $382 trillion financial system to migrate to a new money ne...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your withdrawal order could cost you in taxes
If you have $2M or more saved, the 4% rule points to roughly $92,000 a year - but it's a single-variable answe...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel
The trade I’ve been waiting for since 2011
Ross Givens, Director of Research at Traders Agency, is calling for gold to reach $10,000 an ounce this superc...
Traders Agency | Sponsoredtc pixel
The Rumors About Elon’s Next Move Are Spreading Fast
Rumors are circulating that Elon Musk is preparing to acquire three publicly traded companies. Dr. Mark Sko...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s new dollar decree
The last time America reset its money, it minted 1,300 new millionaires a day. Porter Stansberry believes Exec...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel