Free Trial
→ Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture (From Altimetry) (Ad)tc pixel Free BGCG Stock Alerts

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (BGCG) Competitors

GBX 313 -3.00 (-0.95%)
As of 06/5/2026 12:25 PM Eastern
Compare

BGCG vs. BGFD, BRSC, BUT, ATR, and HAN

Should you buy Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust include The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust (BGFD), BlackRock Smaller Companies (BRSC), Brunner (BUT), Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. (ATR), and Hansa Investment (HAN). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust compare to The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust?

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (LON:BGCG) and The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust (LON:BGFD) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, media sentiment and valuation.

The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust£51.43M3.34-£31.39M£86.813.61
The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust£154.29M4.35£65.49M£188.955.16

In the previous week, Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Positive
The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust Neutral

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays out 2.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust pays out 5.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust has a net margin of 158.45% compared to Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's net margin of 96.33%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's return on equity of 27.39% beat The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust96.33% 27.39% -30.69%
The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust 158.45%19.34%0.31%

6.7% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.8% of The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a beta of 0.69773984, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust has a beta of 0.9896676, suggesting that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust beats Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust compare to BlackRock Smaller Companies?

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (LON:BGCG) and BlackRock Smaller Companies (LON:BRSC) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, risk, earnings and dividends.

6.7% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.7% of BlackRock Smaller Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of BlackRock Smaller Companies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat BlackRock Smaller Companies' score of 0.00 indicating that Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Positive
BlackRock Smaller Companies Neutral

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. BlackRock Smaller Companies pays an annual dividend of GBX 44.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays out 2.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. BlackRock Smaller Companies pays out 30.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a net margin of 96.33% compared to BlackRock Smaller Companies' net margin of 89.65%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's return on equity of 27.39% beat BlackRock Smaller Companies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust96.33% 27.39% -30.69%
BlackRock Smaller Companies 89.65%10.11%-2.39%

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a beta of 0.69773984, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BlackRock Smaller Companies has a beta of 1.3535693, indicating that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

BlackRock Smaller Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BlackRock Smaller Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust£51.43M3.34-£31.39M£86.813.61
BlackRock Smaller Companies£61.45M10.69£120.17M£145.018.96

Summary

BlackRock Smaller Companies beats Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust compare to Brunner?

Brunner (LON:BUT) and Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (LON:BGCG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Brunner has a beta of 0.83170027, suggesting that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a beta of 0.69773984, suggesting that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a net margin of 96.33% compared to Brunner's net margin of 94.80%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's return on equity of 27.39% beat Brunner's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brunner94.80% 8.72% 11.63%
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust 96.33%27.39%-30.69%

In the previous week, Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Brunner's score of 0.00 indicating that Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Brunner Neutral
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Positive

5.3% of Brunner shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.7% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Brunner shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Brunner pays an annual dividend of GBX 24.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Brunner pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays out 2.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Brunner has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brunner, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brunner£57.55M11.16£105.32M£128.4811.60
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust£51.43M3.34-£31.39M£86.813.61

Summary

Brunner beats Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust compare to Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.?

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. (LON:ATR) and Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (LON:BGCG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability and risk.

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. has a beta of 1.023242, indicating that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a beta of 0.69773984, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.'s score of 0.00 indicating that Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. Neutral
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Positive

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. pays out 16.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays out 2.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder Asian Total Return Inv., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.£66.61M9.65£66.84M£68.5710.08
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust£51.43M3.34-£31.39M£86.813.61

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. has a net margin of 254.00% compared to Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's net margin of 96.33%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's return on equity of 27.39% beat Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.254.00% 13.06% 4.75%
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust 96.33%27.39%-30.69%

13.9% of Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.7% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. beats Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust compare to Hansa Investment?

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (LON:BGCG) and Hansa Investment (LON:HAN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a beta of 0.69773984, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hansa Investment has a beta of 0.174, indicating that its share price is 83% less volatile than the broader market.

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Hansa Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays out 2.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hansa Investment pays out 12.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Hansa Investment has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hansa Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust£51.43M3.34-£31.39M£86.813.61
Hansa Investment£26.42M24.94£77.36M£19.3017.31

In the previous week, Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Hansa Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Positive
Hansa Investment Neutral

6.7% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Hansa Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.4% of Hansa Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a net margin of 96.33% compared to Hansa Investment's net margin of 84.16%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's return on equity of 27.39% beat Hansa Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust96.33% 27.39% -30.69%
Hansa Investment 84.16%2.24%13.97%

Summary

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust beats Hansa Investment on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BGCG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BGCG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricBaillie Gifford China Growth TrustAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£171.61M£2.51B£5.74B£2.77B
Dividend Yield0.77%6.02%5.28%6.12%
P/E Ratio3.6125.8916.35364.79
Price / Sales3.342,085.091,112.4587,057.77
Price / Cash77.1460.1591.7827.85
Price / Book1.511.376.507.68
Net Income-£31.39M£264.62M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.63%-1.05%-0.85%-0.49%
1 Month Performance-1.88%-0.45%0.52%2.11%
1 Year Performance25.70%10.23%18.74%72.87%

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BGCG
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust
N/AGBX 313
-0.9%		N/A+23.7%£171.61M£51.43M3.61N/A
BGFD
The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust
N/AGBX 978.56
+0.3%		N/A+26.5%£674.28M£154.29M5.18N/A
BRSC
BlackRock Smaller Companies
N/AGBX 1,318.22
-1.2%		N/A+0.2%£666.03M-£89.64MN/AN/A
BUT
Brunner
N/AGBX 1,514
flat		N/A+5.9%£652.28M£57.55M11.78N/A
ATR
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.
N/AGBX 698.56
-1.1%		N/A+47.6%£650.09M£66.61M10.1913,500

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:BGCG) was last updated on 6/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
How to get into the SpaceX IPO before June 12
Former tech executive and angel investor Jeff Brown - who identified Bitcoin, Tesla, and Nvidia before their h...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Tesla. SolarCity. Twitter. This $4 stock is next.
Elon Musk has a clear pattern: when a supplier becomes mission-critical, he acquires it. He bought SolarCity f...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
She called ASTS before it ran 133%. Here's the system behind it.
Danielle Shay called AST SpaceMobile on Fox Business before it ran 133% - and found NBIS at $54 before it gapp...
Simpler Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why is this free?
Simple Options Trading For Beginners normally sells for $29.97 - but right now Bill Poulos has opened a free w...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
17,000 filings. One word kept appearing.
After reading every 10-K filed by S-P 500 companies over 30 years - 17,000 filings, 3 million pages - one word...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel