Free Trial

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (BGCG) Competitors

GBX 321 -2.00 (-0.62%)
As of 05/15/2026 12:25 PM Eastern

BGCG vs. TRG, BGFD, POLR, BUT, and AAS

Should you buy Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust include The European Smaller Companies Trust (TRG), The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust (BGFD), Polar Capital (POLR), Brunner (BUT), and abrdn Asia Focus (AAS). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust compare to The European Smaller Companies Trust?

The European Smaller Companies Trust (LON:TRG) and Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (LON:BGCG) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a net margin of 96.33% compared to The European Smaller Companies Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's return on equity of 27.39% beat The European Smaller Companies Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The European Smaller Companies TrustN/A N/A N/A
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust 96.33%27.39%-30.69%

In the previous week, The European Smaller Companies Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

The European Smaller Companies Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. The European Smaller Companies Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The European Smaller Companies Trust£340.08M0.00N/A£82.00N/A
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust£51.43M3.42-£31.39M£86.813.70

The European Smaller Companies Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.03 per share. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. The European Smaller Companies Trust pays out 0.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays out 2.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

6.7% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust beats The European Smaller Companies Trust on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust compare to The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust?

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (LON:BGCG) and The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust (LON:BGFD) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and risk.

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a beta of 0.6969595, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust has a beta of 0.9864226, indicating that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust£51.43M3.42-£31.39M£86.813.70
The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust£154.29M4.28£65.49M£188.955.07

The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust has a net margin of 158.45% compared to Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's net margin of 96.33%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's return on equity of 27.39% beat The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust96.33% 27.39% -30.69%
The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust 158.45%19.34%0.31%

In the previous week, The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust and 0 mentions for Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Neutral
The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust Positive

6.7% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.8% of The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays out 2.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust pays out 5.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust beats Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust compare to Polar Capital?

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (LON:BGCG) and Polar Capital (LON:POLR) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a beta of 0.6969595, meaning that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polar Capital has a beta of 0.898, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

Polar Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polar Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust£51.43M3.42-£31.39M£86.813.70
Polar Capital£222.94M3.32£41.05M£40.0019.53

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a net margin of 96.33% compared to Polar Capital's net margin of 16.62%. Polar Capital's return on equity of 30.00% beat Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust96.33% 27.39% -30.69%
Polar Capital 16.62%30.00%14.85%

In the previous week, Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Polar Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Neutral
Polar Capital Neutral

6.7% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.1% of Polar Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.9% of Polar Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Polar Capital has a consensus price target of GBX 781.67, indicating a potential upside of 0.09%. Given Polar Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Polar Capital is more favorable than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Polar Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Polar Capital pays an annual dividend of GBX 46 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays out 2.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Polar Capital pays out 115.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Polar Capital beats Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust compare to Brunner?

Brunner (LON:BUT) and Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (LON:BGCG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, profitability and dividends.

Brunner pays an annual dividend of GBX 24.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Brunner pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays out 2.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Brunner has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a beta of 0.6969595, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Brunner has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brunner, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brunner£57.55M11.05£105.32M£128.4811.49
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust£51.43M3.42-£31.39M£86.813.70

5.3% of Brunner shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.7% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Brunner shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Brunner had 1 more articles in the media than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Brunner and 0 mentions for Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Brunner's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Brunner is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Brunner Positive
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Neutral

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a net margin of 96.33% compared to Brunner's net margin of 94.80%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's return on equity of 27.39% beat Brunner's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brunner94.80% 8.72% 11.63%
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust 96.33%27.39%-30.69%

Summary

Brunner beats Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust compare to abrdn Asia Focus?

abrdn Asia Focus (LON:AAS) and Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (LON:BGCG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and earnings.

abrdn Asia Focus pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. abrdn Asia Focus pays out 8.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays out 2.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

abrdn Asia Focus has a beta of 0.71611387, indicating that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a beta of 0.6969595, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

11.5% of abrdn Asia Focus shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.7% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of abrdn Asia Focus shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

abrdn Asia Focus has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn Asia Focus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
abrdn Asia Focus£115.75M5.34£36.71M£77.495.74
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust£51.43M3.42-£31.39M£86.813.70

In the previous week, abrdn Asia Focus' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
abrdn Asia Focus Neutral
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Neutral

abrdn Asia Focus has a net margin of 102.94% compared to Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's net margin of 96.33%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's return on equity of 27.39% beat abrdn Asia Focus' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
abrdn Asia Focus102.94% 19.85% 2.79%
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust 96.33%27.39%-30.69%

Summary

abrdn Asia Focus beats Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BGCG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BGCG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BGCG vs. The Competition

MetricBaillie Gifford China Growth TrustAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£175.84M£2.35B£5.16B£2.60B
Dividend Yield0.78%5.97%5.25%6.15%
P/E Ratio3.7025.1415.93365.91
Price / Sales3.422,063.581,021.2588,030.08
Price / Cash77.1460.1791.0127.89
Price / Book1.541.356.597.74
Net Income-£31.39M£265.53M£1.15B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.94%-0.71%-0.26%0.21%
1 Month Performance1.58%1.69%1.19%1.56%
1 Year Performance23.46%12.04%18.11%77.95%

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BGCG
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust
N/AGBX 321
-0.6%
N/A+23.9%£175.84M£51.43M3.70N/A
TRG
The European Smaller Companies Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£701.52M£340.08M2.13N/A
BGFD
The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust
N/AGBX 932
+1.1%
N/A+27.7%£667.65M£154.29M4.93N/A
POLR
Polar Capital
N/AGBX 702.67
+2.6%
GBX 691.67
-1.6%
+89.6%£666.28M£222.94M17.57135
BUT
Brunner
N/AGBX 1,504
+0.7%
N/A+7.1%£649.28M£57.55M11.71N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:BGCG) was last updated on 5/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners