Go Pro
→ NNVC on Alert: FDA Validation and Outperform Rating! (From Equiscreen) (Ad)tc pixel Free BGCG Stock Alerts

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (BGCG) Competitors

GBX 294 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 10:19 AM Eastern
Compare

BGCG vs. BRSC, HET, IPO, P2P, and HFEL

Should you buy Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust stock or one of its competitors? Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's main competitors and comparable companies include BlackRock Smaller Companies (BRSC), Henderson European Trust (HET), IP Group (IPO), P2P Global Investments (P2P), and Henderson Far East Income (HFEL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust compare to BlackRock Smaller Companies?

BlackRock Smaller Companies (LON:BRSC) and Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (LON:BGCG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

BlackRock Smaller Companies pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. BlackRock Smaller Companies pays out 30.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays out 2.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

BlackRock Smaller Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BlackRock Smaller Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BlackRock Smaller Companies£61.45M10.14£120.17M£29.008.94
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust£51.43M3.09-£31.39M£86.813.39

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a net margin of 96.33% compared to BlackRock Smaller Companies' net margin of 89.65%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's return on equity of 27.39% beat BlackRock Smaller Companies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BlackRock Smaller Companies89.65% 10.11% -2.39%
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust 96.33%27.39%-30.69%

BlackRock Smaller Companies has a beta of 1.331, indicating that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a beta of 0.698, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

11.5% of BlackRock Smaller Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of BlackRock Smaller Companies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, BlackRock Smaller Companies had 10 more articles in the media than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for BlackRock Smaller Companies and 0 mentions for Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. BlackRock Smaller Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.78 beat Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that BlackRock Smaller Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
BlackRock Smaller Companies Very Positive
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Neutral

Summary

BlackRock Smaller Companies beats Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust compare to Henderson European Trust?

Henderson European Trust (LON:HET) and Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (LON:BGCG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and valuation.

0.6% of Henderson European Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Henderson European Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a net margin of 96.33% compared to Henderson European Trust's net margin of 95.15%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's return on equity of 27.39% beat Henderson European Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Henderson European Trust95.15% 17.54% 10.02%
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust 96.33%27.39%-30.69%

Henderson European Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Henderson European Trust pays out -42.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays out 2.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Henderson European Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Henderson European Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Henderson European Trust-£16.02M-38.79£71.73M-£0.10N/A
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust£51.43M3.09-£31.39M£86.813.39

In the previous week, Henderson European Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Henderson European Trust Neutral
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Neutral

Henderson European Trust has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a beta of 0.698, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust beats Henderson European Trust on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust compare to IP Group?

IP Group (LON:IPO) and Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (LON:BGCG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than IP Group. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
IP Group£90.60M6.67-£209.94M£7.109.64
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust£51.43M3.09-£31.39M£86.813.39

In the previous week, IP Group had 8 more articles in the media than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for IP Group and 0 mentions for Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. IP Group's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that IP Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
IP Group Positive
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Neutral

30.8% of IP Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of IP Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

IP Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 114.50, indicating a potential upside of 67.32%. Given IP Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe IP Group is more favorable than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
IP Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

IP Group has a beta of 1.272, meaning that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a beta of 0.698, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

IP Group has a net margin of 148.78% compared to Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's net margin of 96.33%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's return on equity of 27.39% beat IP Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
IP Group148.78% 7.14% -10.50%
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust 96.33%27.39%-30.69%

Summary

IP Group beats Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust compare to P2P Global Investments?

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (LON:BGCG) and P2P Global Investments (LON:P2P) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a net margin of 96.33% compared to P2P Global Investments' net margin of 0.00%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's return on equity of 27.39% beat P2P Global Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust96.33% 27.39% -30.69%
P2P Global Investments N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled P2P Global Investments'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Neutral
P2P Global Investments Neutral

P2P Global Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. P2P Global Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust£51.43M3.09-£31.39M£86.813.39
P2P Global Investments£119.18M0.00N/A£39.50N/A

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. P2P Global Investments pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.48 per share. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays out 2.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. P2P Global Investments pays out 1.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

5.1% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust beats P2P Global Investments on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust compare to Henderson Far East Income?

Henderson Far East Income (LON:HFEL) and Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (LON:BGCG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Henderson Far East Income had 1 more articles in the media than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Henderson Far East Income and 0 mentions for Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Henderson Far East Income's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Henderson Far East Income Neutral
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Neutral

Henderson Far East Income has a beta of 0.518, meaning that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a beta of 0.698, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

6.9% of Henderson Far East Income shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Henderson Far East Income shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Henderson Far East Income has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Henderson Far East Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Henderson Far East Income£139.58M4.44-£10.33M£72.123.67
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust£51.43M3.09-£31.39M£86.813.39

Henderson Far East Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 24.95 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.4%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Henderson Far East Income pays out 34.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays out 2.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a net margin of 96.33% compared to Henderson Far East Income's net margin of 92.44%. Henderson Far East Income's return on equity of 28.74% beat Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Henderson Far East Income92.44% 28.74% -0.81%
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust 96.33%27.39%-30.69%

Summary

Henderson Far East Income beats Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BGCG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BGCG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BGCG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricBaillie Gifford China Growth TrustCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£159.02M£5.36B£13.89B£2.88B
Dividend Yield0.85%7.50%5.95%6.26%
P/E Ratio3.3930.0225.33366.49
Price / Sales3.091,174.51500.0090,147.76
Price / Cash77.1447.9140.5727.89
Price / Book1.413.502.736.39
Net Income-£31.39M£417.39M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A-1.02%-0.54%-0.09%
1 Month Performance-3.83%-2.60%-0.84%-0.40%
1 Year Performance-2.33%4.27%10.10%20.36%

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BGCG
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust
N/AGBX 294
flat		N/A-2.3%£159.02M£51.43M3.39N/A
BRSC
BlackRock Smaller Companies
N/AGBX 261.50
-0.9%		N/A-80.2%£628.20M£61.45M9.02N/A
HET
Henderson European Trust
N/AGBX 201
flat		N/AN/A£621.31M-£16.02MN/AN/A
IPO
IP Group
4.3389 of 5 stars		GBX 70.30
+4.9%		GBX 105
+49.4%		+20.6%£621.05M£90.60M9.9095
P2P
P2P Global Investments
N/AN/AN/AN/A£617.42M£119.18M20.91N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:BGCG) was last updated on 9/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
“This is the Perfect Tech Stock”
Jeff Brown, the tech investor who identified Nvidia in 2016 before its 37,000% run, has flagged a new AI compa...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
DOJ Admits It In Court—Your Cash Can Be Seized Without Warning
The Department of Justice recently argued in court that cash may not be legally your property - raising concer...
Priority Gold | Sponsoredtc pixel
The national debt just passed $39 trillion
The U.S. national debt just topped $39 trillion, up nearly $3 trillion in a single year and on pace to hit $40...
US Gold Bureau | Sponsoredtc pixel
This Gold Explorer Is Approaching Its Biggest Milestone Yet
A little-known Arizona gold explorer just hit 66.2 metres grading 6.57 g/t gold, including 20.7 metres at 18.2...
Wall Street Logic | Sponsoredtc pixel
NNVC on Alert: FDA Validation and Outperform Rating!
NanoViricides (NYSE: NNVC) just landed FDA Rare Pediatric Disease Designation for NV-387 in Measles, adding to...
Equiscreen | Sponsoredtc pixel
Jon Najarian's #1 Energy Trade for 2026
Jon Najarian says he's never been more excited about an energy opportunity. SpaceX just went public at over $2...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
MILLIONAIRE MASTERCLASS INVITE: Altucher
James Altucher says Elon Musk is preparing an unprecedented project set to surface on September 25. Altuche...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
A “bloodbath” Is Coming
Reports suggest some Silicon Valley billionaires are stockpiling gold, guns, and gas masks - or leaving the co...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel