Go Pro
→ Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside) (From InvestorPlace) (Ad)tc pixel Free BGCG Stock Alerts

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (BGCG) Competitors

GBX 305 -2.50 (-0.81%)
As of 07/16/2026 11:53 AM Eastern
Compare

BGCG vs. SYNC, HAN, IIG, BRSC, and BUT

Should you buy Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust include Syncona (SYNC), Hansa Investment (HAN), Intuitive Investments Group (IIG), BlackRock Smaller Companies (BRSC), and Brunner (BUT). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust compare to Syncona?

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (LON:BGCG) and Syncona (LON:SYNC) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

5.1% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.2% of Syncona shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Syncona shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a beta of 0.70416164, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Syncona has a beta of 0.351, indicating that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

Syncona has a consensus target price of GBX 189, suggesting a potential upside of 76.64%. Given Syncona's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Syncona is more favorable than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Syncona
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Syncona'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Neutral
Syncona Neutral

Syncona has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Syncona is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust£51.43M3.23-£31.39M£86.813.51
Syncona£55.89M11.64-£16.90M-£1.45N/A

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a net margin of 96.33% compared to Syncona's net margin of -15.36%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's return on equity of 27.39% beat Syncona's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust96.33% 27.39% -30.69%
Syncona -15.36%-0.86%0.40%

Summary

Syncona beats Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust compare to Hansa Investment?

Hansa Investment (LON:HAN) and Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (LON:BGCG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, dividends and earnings.

0.2% of Hansa Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 20.6% of Hansa Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Hansa Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Hansa Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hansa Investment Positive
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Neutral

Hansa Investment has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hansa Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hansa Investment£26.42M24.43£77.36M£19.3017.10
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust£51.43M3.23-£31.39M£86.813.51

Hansa Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Hansa Investment pays out 12.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays out 2.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Hansa Investment has a beta of 0.204, indicating that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a beta of 0.70416164, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Hansa Investment has a net margin of 422.56% compared to Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's net margin of 96.33%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's return on equity of 27.39% beat Hansa Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hansa Investment422.56% 17.81% 13.97%
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust 96.33%27.39%-30.69%

Summary

Hansa Investment beats Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust compare to Intuitive Investments Group?

Intuitive Investments Group (LON:IIG) and Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (LON:BGCG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and profitability.

In the previous week, Intuitive Investments Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Intuitive Investments Group Neutral
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Neutral

0.3% of Intuitive Investments Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.1% of Intuitive Investments Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Intuitive Investments Group has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intuitive Investments Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intuitive Investments Group£152.88M3.91-£2.34M£69.453.60
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust£51.43M3.23-£31.39M£86.813.51

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a net margin of 96.33% compared to Intuitive Investments Group's net margin of -5,705.75%. Intuitive Investments Group's return on equity of 36.76% beat Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intuitive Investments Group-5,705.75% 36.76% -0.20%
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust 96.33%27.39%-30.69%

Intuitive Investments Group has a beta of 0.697, meaning that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a beta of 0.70416164, meaning that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Intuitive Investments Group beats Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust compare to BlackRock Smaller Companies?

BlackRock Smaller Companies (LON:BRSC) and Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (LON:BGCG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, BlackRock Smaller Companies had 10 more articles in the media than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for BlackRock Smaller Companies and 0 mentions for Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. BlackRock Smaller Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.63 beat Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that BlackRock Smaller Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
BlackRock Smaller Companies Very Positive
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Neutral

BlackRock Smaller Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BlackRock Smaller Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BlackRock Smaller Companies£61.45M10.78£120.17M£29.009.31
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust£51.43M3.23-£31.39M£86.813.51

55.8% of BlackRock Smaller Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of BlackRock Smaller Companies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

BlackRock Smaller Companies pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. BlackRock Smaller Companies pays out 30.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays out 2.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a net margin of 96.33% compared to BlackRock Smaller Companies' net margin of 89.65%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's return on equity of 27.39% beat BlackRock Smaller Companies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BlackRock Smaller Companies89.65% 10.11% -2.39%
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust 96.33%27.39%-30.69%

BlackRock Smaller Companies has a beta of 0.936, indicating that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a beta of 0.70416164, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

BlackRock Smaller Companies beats Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust compare to Brunner?

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (LON:BGCG) and Brunner (LON:BUT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and valuation.

In the previous week, Brunner had 2 more articles in the media than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Brunner and 0 mentions for Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Brunner's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Brunner is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Neutral
Brunner Positive

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Brunner pays an annual dividend of GBX 24.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays out 2.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brunner pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

5.1% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Brunner shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Brunner shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Brunner has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brunner, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust£51.43M3.23-£31.39M£86.813.51
Brunner£57.55M11.25£105.32M£128.4811.72

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a beta of 0.70416164, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brunner has a beta of 0.556, indicating that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust has a net margin of 96.33% compared to Brunner's net margin of 94.80%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's return on equity of 27.39% beat Brunner's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust96.33% 27.39% -30.69%
Brunner 94.80%8.72%11.63%

Summary

Brunner beats Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BGCG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BGCG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BGCG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricBaillie Gifford China Growth TrustAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£166.28M£2.50B£6.24B£2.86B
Dividend Yield0.82%6.00%5.24%6.12%
P/E Ratio3.5162.7729.67368.59
Price / Sales3.231,843.381,177.0784,750.93
Price / Cash77.1460.50117.4027.89
Price / Book1.471.326.567.56
Net Income-£31.39M£265.96M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A-0.25%-0.10%0.24%
1 Month Performance-2.56%0.06%0.23%-1.15%
1 Year Performance18.22%7.51%15.22%62.40%

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BGCG
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust
N/AGBX 305
-0.8%		N/A+20.1%£166.28M£51.43M3.51N/A
SYNC
Syncona
N/AGBX 108.25
-0.7%		GBX 189
+74.6%		+12.2%£658.35M£55.89MN/A1,208
HAN
Hansa Investment
N/AGBX 336
+1.8%		N/A+21.3%£657.05M£26.42M17.41N/A
IIG
Intuitive Investments Group
N/AGBX 271.25
+0.1%		N/A+108.3%£649.12M£152.88M3.915
BRSC
BlackRock Smaller Companies
N/AGBX 262.50
-1.5%		N/A-79.4%£644.15M£61.45M9.05N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:BGCG) was last updated on 7/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
From the man who predicted 2008 crash…
Porter Stansberry, founder of one of the largest financial research firms in the world, says he's breaking the...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel