Free Trial

Bluefield Solar Income Fund (BSIF) Competitors

Bluefield Solar Income Fund logo
GBX 91.60 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 06/5/2026 12:41 PM Eastern

BSIF vs. MRC, TRIG, PIN, PNL, and HGT

Should you buy Bluefield Solar Income Fund stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Bluefield Solar Income Fund with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Bluefield Solar Income Fund include The Mercantile Investment Trust (MRC), The Renewables Infrastructure Group (TRIG), Pantheon International (PIN), Personal Assets (PNL), and HgCapital Trust (HGT). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Bluefield Solar Income Fund compare to The Mercantile Investment Trust?

Bluefield Solar Income Fund (LON:BSIF) and The Mercantile Investment Trust (LON:MRC) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

In the previous week, Bluefield Solar Income Fund had 7 more articles in the media than The Mercantile Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Bluefield Solar Income Fund and 0 mentions for The Mercantile Investment Trust. Bluefield Solar Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat The Mercantile Investment Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Bluefield Solar Income Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bluefield Solar Income Fund Neutral
The Mercantile Investment Trust Neutral

Bluefield Solar Income Fund has a beta of 0.058, meaning that its stock price is 94% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Mercantile Investment Trust has a beta of 1.5380031, meaning that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the broader market.

Bluefield Solar Income Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.7%. The Mercantile Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Bluefield Solar Income Fund pays out -95.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Mercantile Investment Trust pays out 27.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Bluefield Solar Income Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Bluefield Solar Income Fund currently has a consensus target price of GBX 95, suggesting a potential upside of 3.71%. Given Bluefield Solar Income Fund's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Bluefield Solar Income Fund is more favorable than The Mercantile Investment Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bluefield Solar Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
The Mercantile Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

The Mercantile Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Bluefield Solar Income Fund. Bluefield Solar Income Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Mercantile Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bluefield Solar Income Fund-£52.67M-10.30-£9.36M-£9.31N/A
The Mercantile Investment Trust£209.68M8.30£393.55M£29.039.23

40.2% of Bluefield Solar Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.0% of The Mercantile Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Bluefield Solar Income Fund shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of The Mercantile Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

The Mercantile Investment Trust has a net margin of 89.90% compared to Bluefield Solar Income Fund's net margin of -196.27%. The Mercantile Investment Trust's return on equity of 10.56% beat Bluefield Solar Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bluefield Solar Income Fund-196.27% -4.29% 0.96%
The Mercantile Investment Trust 89.90%10.56%2.53%

Summary

The Mercantile Investment Trust beats Bluefield Solar Income Fund on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bluefield Solar Income Fund compare to The Renewables Infrastructure Group?

The Renewables Infrastructure Group (LON:TRIG) and Bluefield Solar Income Fund (LON:BSIF) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a beta of 0.374, suggesting that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bluefield Solar Income Fund has a beta of 0.058, suggesting that its share price is 94% less volatile than the broader market.

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a net margin of 328.03% compared to Bluefield Solar Income Fund's net margin of -196.27%. Bluefield Solar Income Fund's return on equity of -4.29% beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Renewables Infrastructure Group328.03% -5.09% -1.63%
Bluefield Solar Income Fund -196.27%-4.29%0.96%

The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.53 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. Bluefield Solar Income Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.7%. The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays out -139.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Bluefield Solar Income Fund pays out -95.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Bluefield Solar Income Fund had 7 more articles in the media than The Renewables Infrastructure Group. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Bluefield Solar Income Fund and 0 mentions for The Renewables Infrastructure Group. Bluefield Solar Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Bluefield Solar Income Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
The Renewables Infrastructure Group Neutral
Bluefield Solar Income Fund Neutral

Bluefield Solar Income Fund has higher revenue and earnings than The Renewables Infrastructure Group. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bluefield Solar Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Renewables Infrastructure Group-£123.70M-14.22-£37.22M-£5.40N/A
Bluefield Solar Income Fund-£52.67M-10.30-£9.36M-£9.31N/A

37.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.2% of Bluefield Solar Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Bluefield Solar Income Fund shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

The Renewables Infrastructure Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 100, suggesting a potential upside of 34.23%. Bluefield Solar Income Fund has a consensus price target of GBX 95, suggesting a potential upside of 3.71%. Given The Renewables Infrastructure Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe The Renewables Infrastructure Group is more favorable than Bluefield Solar Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Bluefield Solar Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Bluefield Solar Income Fund beats The Renewables Infrastructure Group on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bluefield Solar Income Fund compare to Pantheon International?

Bluefield Solar Income Fund (LON:BSIF) and Pantheon International (LON:PIN) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Bluefield Solar Income Fund had 3 more articles in the media than Pantheon International. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Bluefield Solar Income Fund and 4 mentions for Pantheon International. Pantheon International's average media sentiment score of 1.96 beat Bluefield Solar Income Fund's score of 0.44 indicating that Pantheon International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Bluefield Solar Income Fund
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Pantheon International
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

40.2% of Bluefield Solar Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.8% of Pantheon International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Bluefield Solar Income Fund shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Pantheon International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pantheon International has higher revenue and earnings than Bluefield Solar Income Fund. Bluefield Solar Income Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pantheon International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bluefield Solar Income Fund-£52.67M-10.30-£9.36M-£9.31N/A
Pantheon International£43.18M38.61£31.00M£8.1947.92

Bluefield Solar Income Fund has a beta of 0.058, suggesting that its stock price is 94% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pantheon International has a beta of 0.8237807, suggesting that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

Bluefield Solar Income Fund currently has a consensus target price of GBX 95, indicating a potential upside of 3.71%. Given Bluefield Solar Income Fund's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Bluefield Solar Income Fund is more favorable than Pantheon International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bluefield Solar Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Pantheon International
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Pantheon International has a net margin of -35.06% compared to Bluefield Solar Income Fund's net margin of -196.27%. Pantheon International's return on equity of -0.30% beat Bluefield Solar Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bluefield Solar Income Fund-196.27% -4.29% 0.96%
Pantheon International -35.06%-0.30%1.05%

Summary

Pantheon International beats Bluefield Solar Income Fund on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bluefield Solar Income Fund compare to Personal Assets?

Bluefield Solar Income Fund (LON:BSIF) and Personal Assets (LON:PNL) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

40.2% of Bluefield Solar Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Personal Assets shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Bluefield Solar Income Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Personal Assets shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Bluefield Solar Income Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.7%. Personal Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Bluefield Solar Income Fund pays out -95.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Personal Assets pays out 19.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Bluefield Solar Income Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Bluefield Solar Income Fund has a beta of 0.058, indicating that its share price is 94% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Personal Assets has a beta of 0.33067337, indicating that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

Personal Assets has a net margin of 156.09% compared to Bluefield Solar Income Fund's net margin of -196.27%. Personal Assets' return on equity of 9.23% beat Bluefield Solar Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bluefield Solar Income Fund-196.27% -4.29% 0.96%
Personal Assets 156.09%9.23%1.96%

In the previous week, Bluefield Solar Income Fund had 7 more articles in the media than Personal Assets. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Bluefield Solar Income Fund and 0 mentions for Personal Assets. Bluefield Solar Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat Personal Assets' score of 0.00 indicating that Bluefield Solar Income Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bluefield Solar Income Fund Neutral
Personal Assets Neutral

Personal Assets has higher revenue and earnings than Bluefield Solar Income Fund. Bluefield Solar Income Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Personal Assets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bluefield Solar Income Fund-£52.67M-10.30-£9.36M-£9.31N/A
Personal Assets£89.00M18.88£124.81M£29.1118.52

Bluefield Solar Income Fund currently has a consensus price target of GBX 95, suggesting a potential upside of 3.71%. Given Bluefield Solar Income Fund's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Bluefield Solar Income Fund is more favorable than Personal Assets.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bluefield Solar Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Personal Assets
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Personal Assets beats Bluefield Solar Income Fund on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bluefield Solar Income Fund compare to HgCapital Trust?

Bluefield Solar Income Fund (LON:BSIF) and HgCapital Trust (LON:HGT) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

HgCapital Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Bluefield Solar Income Fund. Bluefield Solar Income Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HgCapital Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bluefield Solar Income Fund-£52.67M-10.30-£9.36M-£9.31N/A
HgCapital Trust£109.29M15.77£284.58M£21.4917.71

Bluefield Solar Income Fund has a beta of 0.058, meaning that its share price is 94% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HgCapital Trust has a beta of 0.40293187, meaning that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

HgCapital Trust has a net margin of 88.67% compared to Bluefield Solar Income Fund's net margin of -196.27%. HgCapital Trust's return on equity of 3.90% beat Bluefield Solar Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bluefield Solar Income Fund-196.27% -4.29% 0.96%
HgCapital Trust 88.67%3.90%6.88%

In the previous week, Bluefield Solar Income Fund had 5 more articles in the media than HgCapital Trust. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Bluefield Solar Income Fund and 2 mentions for HgCapital Trust. HgCapital Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Bluefield Solar Income Fund's score of 0.44 indicating that HgCapital Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Bluefield Solar Income Fund
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
HgCapital Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Bluefield Solar Income Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.7%. HgCapital Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Bluefield Solar Income Fund pays out -95.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HgCapital Trust pays out 25.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Bluefield Solar Income Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Bluefield Solar Income Fund currently has a consensus target price of GBX 95, suggesting a potential upside of 3.71%. Given Bluefield Solar Income Fund's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Bluefield Solar Income Fund is more favorable than HgCapital Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bluefield Solar Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
HgCapital Trust
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

40.2% of Bluefield Solar Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.1% of HgCapital Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Bluefield Solar Income Fund shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of HgCapital Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

HgCapital Trust beats Bluefield Solar Income Fund on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Bluefield Solar Income Fund News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BSIF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BSIF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BSIF vs. The Competition

MetricBluefield Solar Income FundAsset Management IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£542.35M£2.51B£13.56B£2.79B
Dividend Yield9.85%6.02%5.80%6.12%
P/E Ratio-9.8425.8420.99365.23
Price / Sales-10.302,079.75137.9387,121.98
Price / Cash453.9560.1519.1527.85
Price / Book0.721.372.187.68
Net Income-£9.36M£264.62M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance16.24%-0.98%-0.31%-0.50%
1 Month Performance16.54%-0.38%-0.88%2.10%
1 Year Performance-3.38%10.33%10.50%72.87%

Bluefield Solar Income Fund Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BSIF
Bluefield Solar Income Fund
1.0895 of 5 stars
GBX 91.60
flat
GBX 95
+3.7%
-2.2%£542.35M-£52.67MN/AN/A
MRC
The Mercantile Investment Trust
N/AGBX 268
flat
N/A+6.9%£1.74B£209.68M9.232,800
TRIG
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
1.8716 of 5 stars
GBX 73.70
+2.2%
GBX 100
+35.7%
-9.4%£1.74B-£123.70MN/AN/A
PIN
Pantheon International
2.0318 of 5 stars
GBX 407
+0.7%
N/A+31.7%£1.73B£43.18M49.69455
PNL
Personal Assets
N/AGBX 545
+0.2%
N/A+4.5%£1.70B£89.00M18.72N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:BSIF) was last updated on 6/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners