Go Pro
→ Oxford Club Analyst’s Urgent AI Warning (From The Oxford Club) (Ad)tc pixel Free BRFI Stock Alerts

BlackRock Frontiers (BRFI) Competitors

GBX 190 +1.50 (+0.80%)
As of 11:58 AM Eastern
Compare

BRFI vs. JFJ, IHP, TMPL, FCSS, and GROW

Should you buy BlackRock Frontiers stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares BlackRock Frontiers with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with BlackRock Frontiers include JPMorgan Japanese (JFJ), IntegraFin (IHP), Temple Bar (TMPL), Fidelity China Special (FCSS), and Molten Ventures (GROW). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does BlackRock Frontiers compare to JPMorgan Japanese?

BlackRock Frontiers (LON:BRFI) and JPMorgan Japanese (LON:JFJ) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

BlackRock Frontiers has a net margin of 284.82% compared to JPMorgan Japanese's net margin of 96.52%. JPMorgan Japanese's return on equity of 20.00% beat BlackRock Frontiers' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BlackRock Frontiers284.82% 15.49% 13.46%
JPMorgan Japanese 96.52%20.00%8.06%

8.0% of BlackRock Frontiers shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.9% of JPMorgan Japanese shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of BlackRock Frontiers shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of JPMorgan Japanese shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

BlackRock Frontiers has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan Japanese has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

BlackRock Frontiers pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. JPMorgan Japanese pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. BlackRock Frontiers pays out 24.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JPMorgan Japanese pays out 5.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

JPMorgan Japanese has higher revenue and earnings than BlackRock Frontiers. BlackRock Frontiers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan Japanese, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BlackRock Frontiers£81.92M3.82£73.42M£41.784.55
JPMorgan Japanese£245.55M4.89£194.81M£149.065.31

In the previous week, BlackRock Frontiers' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JPMorgan Japanese'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
BlackRock Frontiers Neutral
JPMorgan Japanese Neutral

Summary

JPMorgan Japanese beats BlackRock Frontiers on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does BlackRock Frontiers compare to IntegraFin?

BlackRock Frontiers (LON:BRFI) and IntegraFin (LON:IHP) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, IntegraFin had 8 more articles in the media than BlackRock Frontiers. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for IntegraFin and 0 mentions for BlackRock Frontiers. IntegraFin's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat BlackRock Frontiers' score of 0.00 indicating that IntegraFin is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
BlackRock Frontiers Neutral
IntegraFin Positive

BlackRock Frontiers pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. IntegraFin pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. BlackRock Frontiers pays out 24.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. IntegraFin pays out 59.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. BlackRock Frontiers is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

BlackRock Frontiers has a net margin of 284.82% compared to IntegraFin's net margin of 28.60%. IntegraFin's return on equity of 27.60% beat BlackRock Frontiers' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BlackRock Frontiers284.82% 15.49% 13.46%
IntegraFin 28.60%27.60%20.29%

BlackRock Frontiers has higher earnings, but lower revenue than IntegraFin. BlackRock Frontiers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IntegraFin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BlackRock Frontiers£81.92M3.82£73.42M£41.784.55
IntegraFin£165.40M7.77£52.54M£19.1020.37

IntegraFin has a consensus price target of GBX 427, suggesting a potential upside of 9.77%. Given IntegraFin's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe IntegraFin is more favorable than BlackRock Frontiers.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BlackRock Frontiers
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
IntegraFin
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

8.0% of BlackRock Frontiers shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.8% of IntegraFin shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of BlackRock Frontiers shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.5% of IntegraFin shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

BlackRock Frontiers has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, IntegraFin has a beta of 1.274, indicating that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

IntegraFin beats BlackRock Frontiers on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does BlackRock Frontiers compare to Temple Bar?

Temple Bar (LON:TMPL) and BlackRock Frontiers (LON:BRFI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

Temple Bar has higher revenue and earnings than BlackRock Frontiers. Temple Bar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BlackRock Frontiers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Temple Bar£281.60M4.39£154.90M£97.004.20
BlackRock Frontiers£81.92M3.82£73.42M£41.784.55

Temple Bar pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. BlackRock Frontiers pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Temple Bar pays out 14.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. BlackRock Frontiers pays out 24.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Temple Bar's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled BlackRock Frontiers'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Temple Bar Neutral
BlackRock Frontiers Neutral

10.7% of Temple Bar shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.0% of BlackRock Frontiers shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Temple Bar shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of BlackRock Frontiers shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

BlackRock Frontiers has a net margin of 284.82% compared to Temple Bar's net margin of 82.15%. Temple Bar's return on equity of 27.93% beat BlackRock Frontiers' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Temple Bar82.15% 27.93% 7.08%
BlackRock Frontiers 284.82%15.49%13.46%

Temple Bar has a beta of 1.1421093, indicating that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BlackRock Frontiers has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Temple Bar beats BlackRock Frontiers on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does BlackRock Frontiers compare to Fidelity China Special?

Fidelity China Special (LON:FCSS) and BlackRock Frontiers (LON:BRFI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

BlackRock Frontiers has a net margin of 284.82% compared to Fidelity China Special's net margin of 81.41%. BlackRock Frontiers' return on equity of 15.49% beat Fidelity China Special's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity China Special81.41% 9.12% N/A
BlackRock Frontiers 284.82%15.49%13.46%

7.8% of Fidelity China Special shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.0% of BlackRock Frontiers shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Fidelity China Special shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of BlackRock Frontiers shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Fidelity China Special pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. BlackRock Frontiers pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Fidelity China Special pays out 26.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. BlackRock Frontiers pays out 24.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. BlackRock Frontiers is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Fidelity China Special has higher revenue and earnings than BlackRock Frontiers. BlackRock Frontiers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity China Special, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity China Special£146.54M8.03£997.06M£29.758.67
BlackRock Frontiers£81.92M3.82£73.42M£41.784.55

In the previous week, Fidelity China Special had 2 more articles in the media than BlackRock Frontiers. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Fidelity China Special and 0 mentions for BlackRock Frontiers. Fidelity China Special's average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat BlackRock Frontiers' score of 0.00 indicating that Fidelity China Special is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity China Special Very Positive
BlackRock Frontiers Neutral

Fidelity China Special has a beta of 0.88374627, meaning that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BlackRock Frontiers has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

BlackRock Frontiers beats Fidelity China Special on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does BlackRock Frontiers compare to Molten Ventures?

BlackRock Frontiers (LON:BRFI) and Molten Ventures (LON:GROW) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

BlackRock Frontiers has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Molten Ventures has a beta of 1.9573506, meaning that its stock price is 96% more volatile than the broader market.

BlackRock Frontiers has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Molten Ventures. BlackRock Frontiers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Molten Ventures, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BlackRock Frontiers£81.92M3.82£73.42M£41.784.55
Molten Ventures£148M6.82-£33.58M£69.008.51

BlackRock Frontiers has a net margin of 284.82% compared to Molten Ventures' net margin of 75.09%. BlackRock Frontiers' return on equity of 15.49% beat Molten Ventures' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BlackRock Frontiers284.82% 15.49% 13.46%
Molten Ventures 75.09%9.21%-3.46%

8.0% of BlackRock Frontiers shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.0% of Molten Ventures shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of BlackRock Frontiers shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Molten Ventures shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Molten Ventures has a consensus price target of GBX 638.67, suggesting a potential upside of 8.80%. Given Molten Ventures' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Molten Ventures is more favorable than BlackRock Frontiers.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BlackRock Frontiers
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Molten Ventures
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Molten Ventures had 1 more articles in the media than BlackRock Frontiers. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Molten Ventures and 0 mentions for BlackRock Frontiers. BlackRock Frontiers' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Molten Ventures'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
BlackRock Frontiers Neutral
Molten Ventures Neutral

Summary

Molten Ventures beats BlackRock Frontiers on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get BlackRock Frontiers News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BRFI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BRFI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BRFI vs. The Competition

Export
MetricBlackRock FrontiersAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£313.15M£2.46B£6.17B£2.88B
Dividend Yield4.12%6.02%5.25%6.16%
P/E Ratio4.5561.7429.54368.27
Price / Sales3.821,766.111,127.5684,379.67
Price / Cash48.2760.50114.2927.89
Price / Book0.891.316.597.61
Net Income£73.42M£265.96M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.33%-0.55%-0.43%0.39%
1 Month Performance-1.04%-0.39%-0.17%-0.64%
1 Year Performance18.01%7.10%13.99%62.99%

BlackRock Frontiers Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BRFI
BlackRock Frontiers
N/AGBX 190
+0.8%		N/A+16.4%£313.15M£81.92M4.55N/A
JFJ
JPMorgan Japanese
N/AGBX 821
+0.7%		N/A+27.0%£1.25B£245.55M5.51N/A
IHP
IntegraFin
3.9924 of 5 stars		GBX 374
-1.4%		GBX 423
+13.1%		+3.8%£1.24B£165.40M19.583,520
TMPL
Temple Bar
N/AGBX 402
+0.4%		N/A+22.1%£1.22B£281.60M4.14N/A
FCSS
Fidelity China Special
N/AGBX 258
+0.4%		N/A-6.5%£1.18B£146.54M8.67N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:BRFI) was last updated on 7/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
America’s answer to universal basic income
Robert Kiyosaki, author of Rich Dad Poor Dad, is highlighting an income strategy he calls the Patriot Income P...
Freedom Financial | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
BlackRock is hoarding it. JPMorgan is hoarding it. Do you own it?
BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Fidelity are reportedly accumulating a scarce blockchain asset - one t...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
The Starlink of Energy
A portable energy unit - already used by the U.S. Navy for decades - is now drawing serious attention from Big...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon is about to dominate the biggest arms race in tech history
Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, and Meta have collectively poured nearly $700 billion into AI infrastructure in 2...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Wall Street legend put 60% in one stock — here’s the ticker
One of America's most famous investors put 60% of his fund into a single stock - and Whitney Tilson of Stansbe...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
It all happens tonight.
Tonight, trader Sean Allison is hosting a live session to walk through his Zero-Dollar Trade Advantage strateg...
Trade Thirsty | Sponsoredtc pixel
The options guide that actually starts at the beginning
Most options educators jump straight into Greeks, spreads, and implied volatility - losing beginners before th...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel