Do analysts rate CHH or CRST?

Crest Nicholson has a consensus target price of GBX 99, indicating a potential upside of 66.39%. Given Crest Nicholson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Crest Nicholson is more favorable than Churchill China. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Churchill China 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Crest Nicholson 0 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.43

Does the media prefer CHH or CRST?

In the previous week, Churchill China and Churchill China both had 1 articles in the media. Crest Nicholson's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Churchill China's score of -0.55 indicating that Crest Nicholson is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Churchill China 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Negative Crest Nicholson 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer SPR or CHH?

In the previous week, Springfield Properties had 3 more articles in the media than Churchill China. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Springfield Properties and 1 mentions for Churchill China. Springfield Properties' average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Churchill China's score of -0.55 indicating that Springfield Properties is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Springfield Properties 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Churchill China 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Negative

Churchill China (CHH) Competitors

GBX 354 -1.00 (-0.28%)

As of 04:38 AM Eastern

Compare

CHH vs. CRST, SPR, LIKE, UPGS, and CFX

Should you buy Churchill China stock or one of its competitors? Churchill China's main competitors and comparable companies include Crest Nicholson (CRST), Springfield Properties (SPR), Likewise Group (LIKE), UP Global Sourcing (UPGS), and Colefax Group (CFX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "household durables" industry.

How does Churchill China compare to Crest Nicholson?

Churchill China (LON:CHH) and Crest Nicholson (LON:CRST) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Churchill China has a beta of 0.804, indicating that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crest Nicholson has a beta of 1.321, indicating that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Churchill China and Churchill China both had 1 articles in the media. Crest Nicholson's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Churchill China's score of -0.55 indicating that Crest Nicholson is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Churchill China	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative
Crest Nicholson	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Churchill China has a net margin of 4.96% compared to Crest Nicholson's net margin of -5.44%. Churchill China's return on equity of 6.05% beat Crest Nicholson's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Churchill China	4.96%	6.05%	8.74%
Crest Nicholson	-5.44%	-4.32%	0.16%

Crest Nicholson has a consensus target price of GBX 99, indicating a potential upside of 66.39%. Given Crest Nicholson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Crest Nicholson is more favorable than Churchill China.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Churchill China	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Crest Nicholson	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.43

9.3% of Churchill China shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.0% of Crest Nicholson shares are held by institutional investors. 24.2% of Churchill China shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Crest Nicholson shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Churchill China pays an annual dividend of GBX 21 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Crest Nicholson pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.2%. Churchill China pays out 61.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crest Nicholson pays out 36.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Churchill China has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Crest Nicholson. Crest Nicholson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Churchill China, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Churchill China	£75.24M	0.52	£7.84M	£34.00	10.41
Crest Nicholson	£558.90M	0.27	-£26.61M	£8.40	7.08

Summary

Churchill China beats Crest Nicholson on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill China compare to Springfield Properties?

Springfield Properties (LON:SPR) and Churchill China (LON:CHH) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, risk, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Springfield Properties pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Churchill China pays an annual dividend of GBX 21 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Springfield Properties pays out 26.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Churchill China pays out 61.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Churchill China has a net margin of 4.96% compared to Springfield Properties' net margin of 3.87%. Churchill China's return on equity of 6.05% beat Springfield Properties' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Springfield Properties	3.87%	5.37%	3.53%
Churchill China	4.96%	6.05%	8.74%

7.5% of Springfield Properties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.3% of Churchill China shares are held by institutional investors. 22.0% of Springfield Properties shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 24.2% of Churchill China shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Churchill China has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Springfield Properties. Churchill China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Springfield Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Springfield Properties	£243.70M	0.55	£7.57M	£7.46	14.95
Churchill China	£75.24M	0.52	£7.84M	£34.00	10.41

Springfield Properties has a beta of 1.083, meaning that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Churchill China has a beta of 0.804, meaning that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Springfield Properties had 3 more articles in the media than Churchill China. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Springfield Properties and 1 mentions for Churchill China. Springfield Properties' average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Churchill China's score of -0.55 indicating that Springfield Properties is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Springfield Properties	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Churchill China	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative

Summary

Churchill China beats Springfield Properties on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill China compare to Likewise Group?

Likewise Group (LON:LIKE) and Churchill China (LON:CHH) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, Churchill China had 1 more articles in the media than Likewise Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Churchill China and 0 mentions for Likewise Group. Likewise Group's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Churchill China's score of -0.55 indicating that Likewise Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Likewise Group	Positive
Churchill China	Negative

Likewise Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.41 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Churchill China pays an annual dividend of GBX 21 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Likewise Group pays out 73.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Churchill China pays out 61.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Churchill China is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Churchill China has a net margin of 4.96% compared to Likewise Group's net margin of 0.84%. Churchill China's return on equity of 6.05% beat Likewise Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Likewise Group	0.84%	3.23%	1.18%
Churchill China	4.96%	6.05%	8.74%

Churchill China has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Likewise Group. Churchill China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Likewise Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Likewise Group	£175.06M	0.81	£978.91K	£0.56	69.64
Churchill China	£75.24M	0.52	£7.84M	£34.00	10.41

5.2% of Likewise Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.3% of Churchill China shares are held by institutional investors. 13.3% of Likewise Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.2% of Churchill China shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Likewise Group has a beta of 1.082, meaning that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Churchill China has a beta of 0.804, meaning that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Churchill China beats Likewise Group on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill China compare to UP Global Sourcing?

UP Global Sourcing (LON:UPGS) and Churchill China (LON:CHH) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

UP Global Sourcing pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share. Churchill China pays an annual dividend of GBX 21 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. UP Global Sourcing pays out 5,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Churchill China pays out 61.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Churchill China is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

32.6% of UP Global Sourcing shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.3% of Churchill China shares are held by institutional investors. 52.5% of UP Global Sourcing shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 24.2% of Churchill China shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Churchill China had 1 more articles in the media than UP Global Sourcing. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Churchill China and 0 mentions for UP Global Sourcing. UP Global Sourcing's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Churchill China's score of -0.55 indicating that UP Global Sourcing is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
UP Global Sourcing	Neutral
Churchill China	Negative

UP Global Sourcing has a net margin of 7.71% compared to Churchill China's net margin of 4.96%. UP Global Sourcing's return on equity of 29.55% beat Churchill China's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
UP Global Sourcing	7.71%	29.55%	9.19%
Churchill China	4.96%	6.05%	8.74%

UP Global Sourcing has a beta of 1.72, indicating that its share price is 72% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Churchill China has a beta of 0.804, indicating that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

UP Global Sourcing has higher revenue and earnings than Churchill China. UP Global Sourcing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Churchill China, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
UP Global Sourcing	£156.05M	0.00	£12.03M	£0.14	N/A
Churchill China	£75.24M	0.52	£7.84M	£34.00	10.41

Summary

UP Global Sourcing beats Churchill China on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill China compare to Colefax Group?

Churchill China (LON:CHH) and Colefax Group (LON:CFX) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

9.3% of Churchill China shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.1% of Colefax Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.2% of Churchill China shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 31.3% of Colefax Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Churchill China has a beta of 0.804, suggesting that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Colefax Group has a beta of 0.173, suggesting that its stock price is 83% less volatile than the broader market.

Churchill China has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Colefax Group. Colefax Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Churchill China, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Churchill China	£75.24M	0.52	£7.84M	£34.00	10.41
Colefax Group	£115.92M	0.58	£5.49M	£140.70	9.52

In the previous week, Churchill China had 1 more articles in the media than Colefax Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Churchill China and 0 mentions for Colefax Group. Colefax Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Churchill China's score of -0.55 indicating that Colefax Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Churchill China	Negative
Colefax Group	Neutral

Colefax Group has a net margin of 6.69% compared to Churchill China's net margin of 4.96%. Colefax Group's return on equity of 22.35% beat Churchill China's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Churchill China	4.96%	6.05%	8.74%
Colefax Group	6.69%	22.35%	6.87%

Churchill China pays an annual dividend of GBX 21 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Colefax Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Churchill China pays out 61.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Colefax Group pays out 4.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Colefax Group beats Churchill China on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Churchill China News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CHH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CHH vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Churchill China	Household Durables Industry	Consumer Discretionary Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£38.93M	£5.18B	£12.34B	£2.81B
Dividend Yield	5.83%	3.46%	73.13%	6.26%
P/E Ratio	10.41	12.17	44.76	367.54
Price / Sales	0.52	17.80	84.30	89,107.68
Price / Cash	8.44	9.20	28.22	27.89
Price / Book	0.64	2.62	3.96	6.82
Net Income	£7.84M	£266.48M	£443.78M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-0.28%	-1.72%	-0.14%	-0.41%
1 Month Performance	1.14%	-4.92%	-4.66%	-0.99%
1 Year Performance	-8.73%	-6.88%	-6.21%	23.40%

Churchill China Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CHH Churchill China	N/A	GBX 354 -0.3%	N/A	-8.1%	£38.93M	£75.24M	10.41	1,500
CRST Crest Nicholson	4.9007 of 5 stars	GBX 58 -3.7%	GBX 99 +70.7%	-64.2%	£148.92M	£558.90M	6.90	778	Gap Down
SPR Springfield Properties	N/A	GBX 112.50 -1.7%	N/A	+3.9%	£134.45M	£282.91M	9.89	636
LIKE Likewise Group	N/A	GBX 34.50 flat	N/A	+31.9%	£126.00M	£163.10M	101.47	455	Positive News Gap Up
UPGS UP Global Sourcing	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£107.17M	£156.05M	857.14	370	Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CHH) was last updated on 10/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Churchill China (CHH) Competitors

CHH vs. CRST, SPR, LIKE, UPGS, and CFX

How does Churchill China compare to Crest Nicholson?

Summary

How does Churchill China compare to Springfield Properties?

Summary

How does Churchill China compare to Likewise Group?

Summary

How does Churchill China compare to UP Global Sourcing?

Summary

How does Churchill China compare to Colefax Group?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CHH vs. The Competition

Churchill China Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Churchill China (CHH) Competitors

CHH vs. CRST, SPR, LIKE, UPGS, and CFX

How does Churchill China compare to Crest Nicholson?

Which has more risk and volatility, CHH or CRST?

Does the media prefer CHH or CRST?

Is CHH or CRST more profitable?

Do analysts rate CHH or CRST?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in CHH or CRST?

Is CHH or CRST a better dividend stock?

Which has better earnings and valuation, CHH or CRST?

Summary

How does Churchill China compare to Springfield Properties?

Is SPR or CHH a better dividend stock?

Is SPR or CHH more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in SPR or CHH?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, SPR or CHH?

Which has more volatility and risk, SPR or CHH?

Does the media prefer SPR or CHH?

Summary

How does Churchill China compare to Likewise Group?

Does the media refer more to LIKE or CHH?

Is LIKE or CHH a better dividend stock?

Is LIKE or CHH more profitable?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, LIKE or CHH?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of LIKE or CHH?

Which has more volatility & risk, LIKE or CHH?

Summary

How does Churchill China compare to UP Global Sourcing?

Is UPGS or CHH a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in UPGS or CHH?

Does the media favor UPGS or CHH?

Is UPGS or CHH more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, UPGS or CHH?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, UPGS or CHH?

Summary

How does Churchill China compare to Colefax Group?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in CHH or CFX?

Which has more volatility and risk, CHH or CFX?

Which has better earnings and valuation, CHH or CFX?

Does the media refer more to CHH or CFX?

Is CHH or CFX more profitable?

Is CHH or CFX a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CHH vs. The Competition

Churchill China Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools