Go Pro
→ Feds Say Your Cash Isn’t Property—Can They Take It? (From Priority Gold) (Ad)tc pixel Free CHH Stock Alerts

Churchill China (CHH) Competitors

Churchill China logo
GBX 376.75 +6.75 (+1.82%)
As of 11:47 AM Eastern
Compare

CHH vs. CRST, GLE, SPR, LIKE, and UPGS

Should you buy Churchill China stock or one of its competitors? Churchill China's main competitors and comparable companies include Crest Nicholson (CRST), MJ Gleeson (GLE), Springfield Properties (SPR), Likewise Group (LIKE), and UP Global Sourcing (UPGS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "household durables" industry.

How does Churchill China compare to Crest Nicholson?

Crest Nicholson (LON:CRST) and Churchill China (LON:CHH) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation and earnings.

Crest Nicholson has a beta of 1.321, suggesting that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Churchill China has a beta of 0.804, suggesting that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Churchill China has a net margin of 4.96% compared to Crest Nicholson's net margin of -5.44%. Churchill China's return on equity of 6.05% beat Crest Nicholson's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Crest Nicholson-5.44% -4.32% 0.16%
Churchill China 4.96%6.05%8.74%

61.0% of Crest Nicholson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.3% of Churchill China shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Crest Nicholson shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.2% of Churchill China shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Crest Nicholson currently has a consensus price target of GBX 102.86, indicating a potential upside of 75.82%. Given Crest Nicholson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Crest Nicholson is more favorable than Churchill China.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Crest Nicholson
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Churchill China
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Crest Nicholson pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Churchill China pays an annual dividend of GBX 33.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. Crest Nicholson pays out 36.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Churchill China pays out 84.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Churchill China has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Crest Nicholson. Crest Nicholson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Churchill China, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crest Nicholson£558.90M0.27-£26.61M£8.406.96
Churchill China£76.28M0.54£7.84M£39.709.49

In the previous week, Crest Nicholson had 6 more articles in the media than Churchill China. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Crest Nicholson and 0 mentions for Churchill China. Churchill China's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Crest Nicholson's score of 0.74 indicating that Churchill China is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Crest Nicholson Positive
Churchill China Positive

Summary

Churchill China beats Crest Nicholson on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill China compare to MJ Gleeson?

Churchill China (LON:CHH) and MJ Gleeson (LON:GLE) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and risk.

Churchill China pays an annual dividend of GBX 33.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. MJ Gleeson pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Churchill China pays out 84.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MJ Gleeson pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, MJ Gleeson had 18 more articles in the media than Churchill China. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for MJ Gleeson and 0 mentions for Churchill China. Churchill China's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat MJ Gleeson's score of 0.50 indicating that Churchill China is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Churchill China Positive
MJ Gleeson Neutral

MJ Gleeson has a consensus price target of GBX 255, indicating a potential upside of 0.39%. Given MJ Gleeson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe MJ Gleeson is more favorable than Churchill China.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Churchill China
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
MJ Gleeson
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

9.3% of Churchill China shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.3% of MJ Gleeson shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.2% of Churchill China shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.3% of MJ Gleeson shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

MJ Gleeson has higher revenue and earnings than Churchill China. Churchill China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MJ Gleeson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Churchill China£76.28M0.54£7.84M£39.709.49
MJ Gleeson£381.06M0.39£20.04M£24.5310.35

Churchill China has a beta of 0.804, suggesting that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MJ Gleeson has a beta of 0.624, suggesting that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Churchill China has a net margin of 4.96% compared to MJ Gleeson's net margin of 3.76%. Churchill China's return on equity of 6.05% beat MJ Gleeson's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Churchill China4.96% 6.05% 8.74%
MJ Gleeson 3.76%4.67%4.73%

Summary

Churchill China and MJ Gleeson tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill China compare to Springfield Properties?

Springfield Properties (LON:SPR) and Churchill China (LON:CHH) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Springfield Properties had 3 more articles in the media than Churchill China. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Springfield Properties and 0 mentions for Churchill China. Churchill China's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Springfield Properties' score of 0.62 indicating that Churchill China is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Springfield Properties Positive
Churchill China Positive

Springfield Properties pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Churchill China pays an annual dividend of GBX 33.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. Springfield Properties pays out 17.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Churchill China pays out 84.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

7.5% of Springfield Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.3% of Churchill China shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.0% of Springfield Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.2% of Churchill China shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Springfield Properties has a net margin of 5.03% compared to Churchill China's net margin of 4.96%. Springfield Properties' return on equity of 8.30% beat Churchill China's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Springfield Properties5.03% 8.30% 3.53%
Churchill China 4.96%6.05%8.74%

Springfield Properties has a beta of 1.083, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Churchill China has a beta of 0.804, indicating that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Churchill China has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Springfield Properties. Churchill China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Springfield Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Springfield Properties£282.91M0.48£7.57M£11.379.94
Churchill China£76.28M0.54£7.84M£39.709.49

Summary

Churchill China beats Springfield Properties on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill China compare to Likewise Group?

Churchill China (LON:CHH) and Likewise Group (LON:LIKE) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Churchill China has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Likewise Group. Churchill China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Likewise Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Churchill China£76.28M0.54£7.84M£39.709.49
Likewise Group£163.10M0.75£978.91K£0.3498.53

Churchill China has a net margin of 4.96% compared to Likewise Group's net margin of 0.54%. Churchill China's return on equity of 6.05% beat Likewise Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Churchill China4.96% 6.05% 8.74%
Likewise Group 0.54%2.10%1.18%

Churchill China has a beta of 0.804, suggesting that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Likewise Group has a beta of 1.082, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

9.3% of Churchill China shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.2% of Likewise Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.2% of Churchill China shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.3% of Likewise Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Churchill China pays an annual dividend of GBX 33.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. Likewise Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.39 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Churchill China pays out 84.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Likewise Group pays out 114.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Churchill China is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Churchill China's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Likewise Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Churchill China is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Churchill China Positive
Likewise Group Neutral

Summary

Churchill China beats Likewise Group on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill China compare to UP Global Sourcing?

UP Global Sourcing (LON:UPGS) and Churchill China (LON:CHH) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and dividends.

UP Global Sourcing has higher revenue and earnings than Churchill China. UP Global Sourcing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Churchill China, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
UP Global Sourcing£156.05M0.00£12.03M£0.14N/A
Churchill China£76.28M0.54£7.84M£39.709.49

In the previous week, Churchill China's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat UP Global Sourcing's score of 0.00 indicating that Churchill China is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
UP Global Sourcing Neutral
Churchill China Positive

UP Global Sourcing has a net margin of 7.71% compared to Churchill China's net margin of 4.96%. UP Global Sourcing's return on equity of 29.55% beat Churchill China's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
UP Global Sourcing7.71% 29.55% 9.19%
Churchill China 4.96%6.05%8.74%

UP Global Sourcing pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share. Churchill China pays an annual dividend of GBX 33.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. UP Global Sourcing pays out 5,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Churchill China pays out 84.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Churchill China is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

UP Global Sourcing has a beta of 1.72, suggesting that its stock price is 72% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Churchill China has a beta of 0.804, suggesting that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

32.6% of UP Global Sourcing shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.3% of Churchill China shares are owned by institutional investors. 52.5% of UP Global Sourcing shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.2% of Churchill China shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

UP Global Sourcing beats Churchill China on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Churchill China News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CHH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CHH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CHH vs. The Competition

Export
MetricChurchill ChinaHousehold Durables IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£41.44M£5.24B£12.46B£2.87B
Dividend Yield5.68%3.52%58.24%6.26%
P/E Ratio9.4912.6644.40366.48
Price / Sales0.5464.1293.7390,140.91
Price / Cash8.449.1228.5527.89
Price / Book0.682.754.036.38
Net Income£7.84M£270.86M£445.74M£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.71%-0.85%-1.14%-0.08%
1 Month Performance-4.62%-3.10%-4.77%-0.41%
1 Year Performance-12.38%-7.83%-7.11%20.30%

Churchill China Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CHH
Churchill China
N/AGBX 376.75
+1.8%		N/A-14.4%£41.44M£76.28M9.491,500
CRST
Crest Nicholson
4.8929 of 5 stars		GBX 57.70
flat		GBX 102.86
+78.3%		-62.7%£148.15M£558.90M6.87778
GLE
MJ Gleeson
2.5891 of 5 stars		GBX 247.50
-0.2%		GBX 310
+25.3%		-27.0%£144.38M£381.06M10.09743
SPR
Springfield Properties
N/AGBX 106.80
-0.7%		N/A+18.6%£127.58M£282.91M9.39636
LIKE
Likewise Group
N/AGBX 33.50
-1.5%		N/A+17.8%£123.26M£163.10M98.53455

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CHH) was last updated on 9/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Why major institutions are piling into this digital asset now
BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Fidelity are reportedly accumulating a scarce blockchain asset - one t...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
A “bloodbath” Is Coming
Reports suggest some Silicon Valley billionaires are stockpiling gold, guns, and gas masks - or leaving the co...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Gold just passed our debt as the world's #1 asset
China's US Treasury holdings have fallen from a peak of $1.32 trillion to roughly $659 billion, an 18-year low...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
The trade I’ve been waiting for since 2011
Ross Givens, Director of Research at Traders Agency, is calling for gold to reach $10,000 an ounce this superc...
Traders Agency | Sponsoredtc pixel
NNVC on Alert: FDA Validation and Outperform Rating!
NanoViricides (NYSE: NNVC) just landed FDA Rare Pediatric Disease Designation for NV-387 in Measles, adding to...
Equiscreen | Sponsoredtc pixel
What Is A Roth Conversion, And How Do I Set One Up?
A Roth conversion moves money from a traditional IRA or employer plan into a Roth IRA, triggering income tax t...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel
Musk says UBI is coming. I say it's already here.
Elon Musk says AI could make money irrelevant by 2036. One income program already exists today, funded not by ...
Freedom Financial | Sponsoredtc pixel
How options let you do more with less capital
Would you rather spend $5,000 buying 100 shares of a $50 stock, or control those same 100 shares for a fractio...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel