Go Pro

Churchill China (CHH) Competitors

Churchill China logo
GBX 350.18 +10.18 (+2.99%)
As of 12:34 PM Eastern

CHH vs. GHG, WEN, TAST, TGR, and RRR

Should you buy Churchill China stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Churchill China with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Churchill China include Georgia Healthcare Group PLC (GHG.L) (GHG), Wentworth Resources (WEN), Tasty (TAST), Tirupati Graphite (TGR), and Red Rock Resources (RRR). These companies are all part of the "restaurants, hotels, motels" industry.

How does Churchill China compare to Georgia Healthcare Group PLC (GHG.L)?

Churchill China (LON:CHH) and Georgia Healthcare Group PLC (GHG.L) (LON:GHG) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings and media sentiment.

Churchill China has a net margin of 5.72% compared to Georgia Healthcare Group PLC (GHG.L)'s net margin of 0.00%. Churchill China's return on equity of 7.14% beat Georgia Healthcare Group PLC (GHG.L)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Churchill China5.72% 7.14% 8.74%
Georgia Healthcare Group PLC (GHG.L) N/A N/A N/A

12.4% of Churchill China shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.2% of Churchill China shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Churchill China had 1 more articles in the media than Georgia Healthcare Group PLC (GHG.L). MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Churchill China and 0 mentions for Georgia Healthcare Group PLC (GHG.L). Churchill China's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Georgia Healthcare Group PLC (GHG.L)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Churchill China is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Churchill China Positive
Georgia Healthcare Group PLC (GHG.L) Neutral

Churchill China has higher revenue and earnings than Georgia Healthcare Group PLC (GHG.L).

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Churchill China£76.28M0.50£7.84M£39.708.82
Georgia Healthcare Group PLC (GHG.L)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Churchill China pays an annual dividend of GBX 33.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.6%. Georgia Healthcare Group PLC (GHG.L) pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.01 per share. Churchill China pays out 84.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Churchill China beats Georgia Healthcare Group PLC (GHG.L) on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill China compare to Wentworth Resources?

Wentworth Resources (LON:WEN) and Churchill China (LON:CHH) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Churchill China has a net margin of 5.72% compared to Wentworth Resources' net margin of -32.86%. Churchill China's return on equity of 7.14% beat Wentworth Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wentworth Resources-32.86% -13.43% 11.33%
Churchill China 5.72%7.14%8.74%

Churchill China has higher revenue and earnings than Wentworth Resources. Wentworth Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Churchill China, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wentworth Resources£42.18M0.00-£13.86M-£0.05N/A
Churchill China£76.28M0.50£7.84M£39.708.82

Wentworth Resources pays an annual dividend of GBX 1 per share. Churchill China pays an annual dividend of GBX 33.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.6%. Wentworth Resources pays out -2,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Churchill China pays out 84.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

44.0% of Wentworth Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.4% of Churchill China shares are held by institutional investors. 26.1% of Wentworth Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 24.2% of Churchill China shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Wentworth Resources has a beta of 0.32, suggesting that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Churchill China has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Churchill China had 1 more articles in the media than Wentworth Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Churchill China and 0 mentions for Wentworth Resources. Churchill China's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Wentworth Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Churchill China is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wentworth Resources Neutral
Churchill China Positive

Summary

Churchill China beats Wentworth Resources on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill China compare to Tasty?

Churchill China (LON:CHH) and Tasty (LON:TAST) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

Churchill China has higher revenue and earnings than Tasty. Tasty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Churchill China, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Churchill China£76.28M0.50£7.84M£39.708.82
Tasty£36.62M0.34£7.32M£0.096.29

In the previous week, Tasty had 1 more articles in the media than Churchill China. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Tasty and 1 mentions for Churchill China. Churchill China's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Tasty's score of 0.57 indicating that Churchill China is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Churchill China
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Tasty
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Churchill China has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tasty has a beta of 1.77, indicating that its stock price is 77% more volatile than the broader market.

12.4% of Churchill China shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.8% of Tasty shares are held by institutional investors. 24.2% of Churchill China shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Tasty shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Tasty has a net margin of 43.83% compared to Churchill China's net margin of 5.72%. Churchill China's return on equity of 7.14% beat Tasty's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Churchill China5.72% 7.14% 8.74%
Tasty 43.83%-198.14%26.29%

Summary

Churchill China beats Tasty on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill China compare to Tirupati Graphite?

Churchill China (LON:CHH) and Tirupati Graphite (LON:TGR) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

Churchill China has a net margin of 5.72% compared to Tirupati Graphite's net margin of -0.27%. Churchill China's return on equity of 7.14% beat Tirupati Graphite's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Churchill China5.72% 7.14% 8.74%
Tirupati Graphite -0.27%-0.07%-5.46%

In the previous week, Churchill China and Churchill China both had 1 articles in the media. Churchill China's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Tirupati Graphite's score of 0.00 indicating that Churchill China is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Churchill China
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Tirupati Graphite
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

12.4% of Churchill China shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.1% of Tirupati Graphite shares are held by institutional investors. 24.2% of Churchill China shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Tirupati Graphite shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Churchill China has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tirupati Graphite has a beta of 1.494, suggesting that its share price is 49% more volatile than the broader market.

Churchill China has higher revenue and earnings than Tirupati Graphite. Tirupati Graphite is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Churchill China, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Churchill China£76.28M0.50£7.84M£39.708.82
Tirupati Graphite£1.87M3.34-£3.59M-£5.45N/A

Summary

Churchill China beats Tirupati Graphite on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Churchill China compare to Red Rock Resources?

Red Rock Resources (LON:RRR) and Churchill China (LON:CHH) are both small-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Churchill China has a net margin of 5.72% compared to Red Rock Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Churchill China's return on equity of 7.14% beat Red Rock Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Red Rock ResourcesN/A -22.70% -8.69%
Churchill China 5.72%7.14%8.74%

In the previous week, Churchill China had 1 more articles in the media than Red Rock Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Churchill China and 0 mentions for Red Rock Resources. Churchill China's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Red Rock Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Churchill China is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Red Rock Resources Neutral
Churchill China Positive

2.1% of Red Rock Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.4% of Churchill China shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of Red Rock Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.2% of Churchill China shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Red Rock Resources has a beta of 1.6, suggesting that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Churchill China has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Churchill China has higher revenue and earnings than Red Rock Resources. Red Rock Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Churchill China, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Red Rock ResourcesN/AN/A-£2.85M-£0.06N/A
Churchill China£76.28M0.50£7.84M£39.708.82

Summary

Churchill China beats Red Rock Resources on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Churchill China News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CHH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CHH vs. The Competition

MetricChurchill ChinaFurnishings, Fixtures & Appliances IndustryCyclical SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£38.51M£598.30M£3.93B£2.77B
Dividend Yield6.18%3.08%3.48%6.15%
P/E Ratio8.8211.9577.49368.16
Price / Sales0.5041.46341.1584,554.80
Price / Cash8.4411.5430.8427.89
Price / Book0.631.393.597.53
Net Income£7.84M£12.18M£249.12M£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.80%-2.28%0.70%5.85%
1 Month Performance2.99%-1.30%6.28%4.48%
1 Year Performance-27.05%-11.19%4.55%62.28%

Churchill China Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CHH
Churchill China
N/AGBX 350.18
+3.0%
N/A-40.9%£38.51M£76.28M8.821,500
GHG
Georgia Healthcare Group PLC (GHG.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£91.67MN/AN/A2,890
WEN
Wentworth Resources
N/AN/AN/AN/A£58.56M£42.18MN/A14,500
TAST
Tasty
N/AGBX 0.55
flat
N/A+10.0%£12.44M£36.62M6.291,041
TGR
Tirupati Graphite
N/AGBX 1.11
-5.6%
N/AN/A£8.92M£1.87MN/A36,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CHH) was last updated on 7/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners